Processing math: 91%
Research article Special Issues

A new method to evaluate regular ternary semigroups in multi-polar fuzzy environment

  • Received: 28 October 2021 Revised: 09 March 2022 Accepted: 14 March 2022 Published: 24 April 2022
  • MSC : 03E72, 18B40, 20N10

  • Theory of m-polar fuzzy set deals with multi-polar information. It is used when data comes from m factors (m2). The primary objective of this work is to explore a generalized form of m-polar fuzzy subsemigroups, which is m-polar fuzzy ternary subsemigroups. There are many algebraic structures which are not closed under binary multiplication that is a reason to study ternary operation of multiplication such as the set of negative integer is closed under the operation of ternary multiplication but not closed for the binary multiplication. This paper, presents several significant results related to the notions of m-polar fuzzy ternary subsemigroups, m-polar fuzzy ideals, m-polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideals, m-polar fuzzy bi-ideals, m-polar fuzzy quasi-ideals and m-polar fuzzy interior ideals in ternary semigroups. Also, it is proved that every m- polar fuzzy bi-ideal of ternary semigroup is an m-polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideal of ternary semigroup but converse is not true in general. Moreover, this paper characterizes regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups by the properties of m-polar fuzzy ideals, m-polar fuzzy bi-ideals.

    Citation: Shahida Bashir, Ahmad N. Al-Kenani, Maria Arif, Rabia Mazhar. A new method to evaluate regular ternary semigroups in multi-polar fuzzy environment[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12241-12263. doi: 10.3934/math.2022680

    Related Papers:

    [1] Anas Al-Masarwah, Abd Ghafur Ahmad . Subalgebras of type (α, β) based on m-polar fuzzy points in BCK/BCI-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1035-1049. doi: 10.3934/math.2020072
    [2] Ubaid Ur Rehman, Tahir Mahmood, Muhammad Naeem . Bipolar complex fuzzy semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3997-4021. doi: 10.3934/math.2023200
    [3] Muhammad Riaz, Maryam Saba, Muhammad Abdullah Khokhar, Muhammad Aslam . Novel concepts of $ m $-polar spherical fuzzy sets and new correlation measures with application to pattern recognition and medical diagnosis. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11346-11379. doi: 10.3934/math.2021659
    [4] Anas Al-Masarwah, Abd Ghafur Ahmad . On (complete) normality of m-pF subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 740-750. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.740
    [5] Muhammad Akram, Uzma Noreen, Mohammed M. Ali Al-Shamiri, Dragan Pamucar . Integrated decision-making methods based on 2-tuple linguistic $ m $-polar fuzzy information. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14557-14594. doi: 10.3934/math.2022802
    [6] Muhammad Riaz, Khadija Akmal, Yahya Almalki, S. A. Alblowi . Cubic m-polar fuzzy topology with multi-criteria group decision-making. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13019-13052. doi: 10.3934/math.2022721
    [7] Mohammed M. Ali Al-Shamiri, Adeel Farooq, Muhammad Nabeel, Ghous Ali, Dragan Pamučar . Integrating TOPSIS and ELECTRE-Ⅰ methods with cubic $ m $-polar fuzzy sets and its application to the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11875-11915. doi: 10.3934/math.2023601
    [8] Warud Nakkhasen, Teerapan Jodnok, Ronnason Chinram . Intra-regular semihypergroups characterized by Fermatean fuzzy bi-hyperideals. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35800-35822. doi: 10.3934/math.20241698
    [9] Rukchart Prasertpong . Roughness of soft sets and fuzzy sets in semigroups based on set-valued picture hesitant fuzzy relations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2891-2928. doi: 10.3934/math.2022160
    [10] S. Meenakshi, G. Muhiuddin, B. Elavarasan, D. Al-Kadi . Hybrid ideals in near-subtraction semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13493-13507. doi: 10.3934/math.2022746
  • Theory of m-polar fuzzy set deals with multi-polar information. It is used when data comes from m factors (m2). The primary objective of this work is to explore a generalized form of m-polar fuzzy subsemigroups, which is m-polar fuzzy ternary subsemigroups. There are many algebraic structures which are not closed under binary multiplication that is a reason to study ternary operation of multiplication such as the set of negative integer is closed under the operation of ternary multiplication but not closed for the binary multiplication. This paper, presents several significant results related to the notions of m-polar fuzzy ternary subsemigroups, m-polar fuzzy ideals, m-polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideals, m-polar fuzzy bi-ideals, m-polar fuzzy quasi-ideals and m-polar fuzzy interior ideals in ternary semigroups. Also, it is proved that every m- polar fuzzy bi-ideal of ternary semigroup is an m-polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideal of ternary semigroup but converse is not true in general. Moreover, this paper characterizes regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups by the properties of m-polar fuzzy ideals, m-polar fuzzy bi-ideals.



    A non-empty set together with one or more binary operations is called an algebraic structure. Algebraic structures have various applications in mathematics, including physics, control engineering, topological spaces, computer science, and coding theory [1]. It was Lehmer [2] who firstly studied the concept of ternary algebraic system. Ternary semigroups are important because of their applications to modern mathematical physics, algebraic, functional, and analytical methods [3]. Theory of ternary semigroups was established by Santiago, and Bala [4]. Los [5] proved a semigroup can be embedded to ternary semigroup but every ternary semigroup cannot necessarily be reduced to a semigroup. Here, illustrating an example, {ι,ι,0} with ternary operation of multiplication in complex numbers is ternary semigroup, but it is not a semigroup under usual binary multiplication. Also, there are various structures that are not handled by binary multiplication, so we have used the ternary operation to solve these problems. For instance consider the set of rational numbers Q is a semigroup but its subset Q is not a subsemigroup of Q because with the binary multiplication, it is not closed. But, under the ternary product Q is closed. Sioson defined the notions of ideals in ternary semigroups [6]. For more detail, see [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].

    Theory of fuzzy set is well-known presented by Zadeh [16]. It has a variety of applications in different fields including medical diagnosis, digital communications, artificial intelligence, social, management sciences, decision-making challenges, and many more. A fuzzy set is established by a membership function whose range is the unit interval [0,1]. Theory of bipolar fuzzy set is an extension of fuzzy set which deals with the uncertain, and complex problems, both in positive, and negative aspects with membership degree range of [1,1]. For more applications of fuzzy set and bipolar fuzzy set, see [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

    Chen proposed bipolar fuzzy sets and 2-polar fuzzy sets are cryptomorphic mathematical concepts. By using the idea of one-to-one correspondence, the bipolar fuzzy sets are extended to m-PF sets [25]. Sometimes, different objects have been monitored in different ways. This led to the study of m-PF set. To assign the membership degrees to several objects regarding multi-polar information, m-PF set works successfully. Here, no membership degree will be assumed as negative as m-PF set provides only positive degree of memberships of each element.

    The m-PF sets are applicable when a company decides to construct an item, a country elects its political leader, or a group of mates wants to visit a country with various options. It can be used to discuss the confusions, and conflicts of communication signals in wireless communication. Thus, m-PF set can be implement in both real world problems, and mathematical theories. For example, a fuzzy set "good leader" can have different interpretations among politicians of particular area. Multi-polar information, weighted games, multi-attributes, multi-index, multi-objects, multi-valued interactions, and multi-agent are only a few examples of real world applications for m-PF set. For more and recent applications, see [25,26].

    We will give an example to demonstrate it.

    Let H={e,f,g,h,i} be a set of 5 candidates for the selection of appropriate political leader. We have characterized them according to five qualities in the form of 5-PFS given in Table 1. Also, the graphical representation of a 5-PFS is shown in Figure 1.

    Table 1.  Table of qualities with their membership values.
    Vision Positivity Foresight Transparency Honesty
    e 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.9
    f 0.9 0.4 0.7 1 0.6
    g 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.7
    h 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.6
    i 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  The graphical representation of a 5-PFS according to values as given in Table 1.

    Thus, we get a 5-PFS ψ:H[0,1]5 of H such that

    ψ(e)=(0.4,0.7,0.6,0.5,0.9)ψ(f)=(0.9,0.4,0.7,1,0.6)ψ(g)=(0.5,0.6,0.3,0.9,0.7)ψ(h)=(0.9,0.8,0.5,0.4,0.6)ψ(i)=(0.6,0.5,0.7,0.9,0.8).

    Here, the value 1 represents good remarks, 0.5 represents average, and 0 represents bad remarks. When we combine the technique of m-PF set to ternary semigroup, it will be more useful. Many works have been done on m-PF set. Some previous work is given below.

    1) In 2019, Al-Masarwah worked on m-polar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras [27,28]. Al-Masarwah & Ahmad studied the m-polar (α,β)-fuzzy ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras [29] and he also worked on normality of m-PF subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebra [30].

    2) In 2020, Muhiuddin et al. introduced m-polar fuzzy q-ideals in BCI-algebras [31].

    3) In 2021, Muhiuddin et al. introduced interval valued m-polar fuzzy BCK/BCI-algebras and interval-valued m-polar fuzzy positive implicative ideals in BCK-algebras [32,33].

    4) In 2021, Shabir et al. studied m-polar fuzzy ideals in terms of LA-semigroups [34].

    5) Later on, Bashir et al. initiated the concept of regular and intra-regular semigroups in terms of m-polar fuzzy environment [35].

    In this paper, we have introduced the concept of m-PFIs in ternary semigroups, also characterized regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups by the properties of these m-PFIs.

    The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we define the fundamental notions of m-PF sets in ternary semigroups. The main part of this paper is Section 3, in which m-PFTSSs and m-PFIs of ternary semigroups with examples are discussed. In Section 4, we have characterized regular, and intra-regular ternary semigroups with the properties of m-PFIs. A comparison of this paper to previous work is given in Section 5. In the last, we discuss the conclusions of this work and our future work.

    The list of acronyms used here, is given in Table 2.

    Table 2.  List of acronyms.
    Acronyms Representation
    m-PF m-Polar fuzzy
    m-PFS m-Polar fuzzy subset
    m-PFSS m-Polar fuzzy subsemigroup
    m-PFTSS m-Polar fuzzy ternary subsemigroup
    m-PFI m-Polar fuzzy ideal
    m-PFLI m-Polar fuzzy left ideal
    m-PFMI m-Polar fuzzy middle ideal
    m-PFRI m-Polar fuzzy right ideal
    m-PFGBI m-Polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideal
    m-PFBI m-Polar fuzzy bi-ideal
    m-PFQI m-Polar fuzzy quasi-ideal
    m-PFII m-Polar fuzzy interior ideal

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this phase, we show some fundamentals but necessary ideas, and preliminary results based on ternary semigroups that are important in their own right. These are prerequisite for later sections. A mapping () : D×D×DD is called a ternary operation for any non-empty set D. A non-empty set D with ternary operation ( ) is called ternary semigroup if it fulfills associative law such as ((d1d2d3)d4d5)=(d1(d2d3d4)d5)=(d1d2(d3d4d5)) for all d1,d2,d3,d4,d5D. Throughout this paper, D will indicate ternary semigroup, unless otherwise specified, and subsets indicate non-empty subsets. A subset H of D is called ternary subsemigroup of D if HHHH. A right ideal (resp. lateral or middle ideal, and left ideal) of D is a subset H of D satisfying HDDH(resp.DHDH,DDHH). A subset H is called an ideal if it is right ideal, lateral ideal, and left ideal [36]. A subset H of D is called generalized bi-ideal of D if HDHDHH. A subset H of D is called bi-ideal of D if HHHH, and HDHDHH [37]. A subset H of D is called quasi-ideal of D if HDDDHDDDHH and HDDDDHDDDDHH [38]. A subset H of D is called an interior ideal of D if DDHDDH [39]. A mapping ψ:D[0,1]m is an m-PFS or a ([0,1]m-set) on D. The m-PFS is an m-tuple of membership degree function of D that is ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm), where ψκ:D[0,1] is a mapping for all κ{1,2,...,m}. The m-PF set is a generalization of BFS. Similar to the case of BFS, an m-PF set can be presented as m different fuzzy sets. Therefore, in this situation each input is characterized by an m-dimensional vector of numbers from the close interval [0,1], each presenting a confidence degree. Assume that the set κ={1,2,...,m} is the set of context. The degree of satisfaction for each element with respect to the κth context will thus be represented by an m-PF set for each κN [40]. The m-PF set is an m-tuple of membership degree function of D that is ψ={ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm}, where ψκ:D[0,1] is a mapping for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    The set of all m-PFSs of D is called an m-PF power set of D and presented as m(D). We define relation on m-PF power set (m(D)) as follows: ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m),=(1,2,...,m) are m-PFSs of D,ψ means that ψκ(l)κ(l)κ(l) for all lD, and κ{1,2,...,m}. The symbols ψ and ψ indicates these m-PFSs of D. (ψ)(l)=ψ(l)(l)(l),(ψ)(l)=ψ(l)(l)(l) that is (ψκκκ)(l)=ψκ(l)κ(l)κ(l) and (ψκκκ)(l)=ψκ(l)κ(l)κ(l) for all lD and κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m), and =(1,2,...,m) be m-PFSs of D. The ternary product of ψ,, is denoted as (ψ)=(ψ111,ψ222,...,ψκκκ), and defined as

    (ψκκκ)(l)={l=ghi{ψκ(g)κ(h)κ(i)},ifl=ghi;0otherwise;

    for some g,h,iD, and for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Example 1 shows the multiplication of m-PFSs of ψ,, and of D for m=3.

    Example 1. Consider a ternary semigroup D={0,d1,d2}. The multiplication of m-PFSs ψ,, of D are given in Tables 35 for m=3.

    Table 3.  Multiplication under 0.
    0 0 d1 d2
    0 0 0 0
    d1 0 0 0
    d2 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Multiplication under d1.
    d1 0 d1 d2
    0 0 0 0
    d1 0 d2 d1
    d2 0 d1 d2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Multiplication under d2.
    d2 0 d1 d2
    0 0 0 0
    d1 0 d1 d2
    d2 0 d2 d1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We define 3-PFSs ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3),=(1,2,3) and =(1,2,3) of D as follows:

    ψ(0)=(0.5,0.2,0.3),ψ(d1)=(0.6,0.3,0.8),ψ(d2)=(0,0,0);
    (0)=(0.3,0.4,0.1),(d1)=(0.4,0.1,0.2),(d2)=(0.3,0.1,0.5);
    (0)=(0.1,0.2,0.1),(d1)=(0.3,0.4,0.5),(d2)=(0.2,0.4,0).

    Then, we have

    (ψ111)(0)=0.3,(ψ111)(d1)=0.3,(ψ111)(d2)=0.3;
    (ψ222)(0)=0.3,(ψ222)(d1)=0.1,(ψ222)(d2)=0.1;
    (ψ333)(0)=0.3,(ψ333)(d1)=0.5,(ψ333)(d2)=0.2.

    Hence, the product of ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3),=(1,2,3),=(1,2,3) is defined by: (ψ)(0)=(0.3,0.3,0.3),(ψ)(d1)=(0.3,0.1,0.5) and (ψ)(d2)=(0.3,0.1,0.2).

    This is a significant part because in this section we have done our major contributions. In this part, the notions of m-PFTSSs, m-PFIs, m-PFGBIs, m-PFBIs, m-PFQIs and m-PFIIs of ternary semigroups are explored by using various examples and lemmas. We have proved that, every m-PFBI of D is an m-PFGBI of D but the converse does not hold. This result was previously proved for semigroup by Bashir et al. [35]. We have generalized the results of [35] for ternary semigroups. Ternary semigroup is more general than semigroup. Throughout the paper, δ is the m-PFS of D that maps every element of D on (1,1,...,1).

    Definition 1. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFS of D.

    1) Define ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} for all α, where α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1]m, that is ψκ(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Then ψα is called an α-cut or a level set. This indicates ψα=mκ=1(ψκ)ακ.

    2) The support of ψ:D[0,1]m is defined as a set Supp(ψ)={lD|ψ(l)>(0,0,...,0),m-tuple} that is ψκ(l)>0 for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Definition 2. An m-PFS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) of D is called an m-PFTSS of D if for all g,h,iD, ψ(ghi)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i) that is ψκ(ghi)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Definition 3. An m-PFS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...ψm) of D is called an m-PFRI ( resp. m-PFMI, and m-PFLI ) of D if for all g,h,iD,ψ(ghi)ψ(g)( resp. ψ(ghi)ψ(h),ψ(ghi)ψ(i)) that is, ψκ(ghi)ψκ(g)( resp. ψκ(ghi)ψκ(h),ψκ(ghi)ψκ(i)) for all κ{1,2,..,m}.

    1) If ψ is together m-PFRI and m-PFLI of D then ψ is called an m-PF two-sided ideal of D;

    2) If ψ is together m-PFRI, m-PFMI, and m-PFLI of D then ψ is called an m-PFI of D.

    The Example 2 is of 3-PFl of D.

    Example 2. Consider the ternary semigroup D={0,d1,d2} given in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 of Example 1. We define 3-PFS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3) of D as follows: ψ(0)=(0.9,0.9,0.6),ψ(d1)=ψ(d2)=(0.5,0.3,0.1). Clearly, ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3) is 3-PFRI, 3-PFMI and 3-PFLI of D. Hence ψ is 3-PF ideal of D.

    Definition 4. Let H be a subset of D. Then the m-polar characteristic function χ:H[0,1]m of H is defined as

    χH(l)={(1,1,,1),m-tuple iflH;(0,0,,0),m-tuple iflH.

    Lemma 1. Let H,I and J be subsets of D. Then the following conditions are true:

    1) χHχI=χHI;

    2) χHχI=χHI;

    3) χHχIχJ=χHIJ.

    Proof. The proof of (1) and (2) are obvious.

    (3) Let H,I and J be subsets of D.

    Case 1: Let lHIJ. This implies that l=ghi for some gH,hI, and iJ. Thus, χHIJ(l)=(1,1,...,1). Since gH,hI,iJ, we have χH(g)=(1,1,...,1)=χI(h)=χJ(i). Now,

    (χHχIχJ)(l)=l=pqr{χH(p)χI(q)χJ(r)}
    χH(g)χI(h)χJ(i)
    =(1,1,...,1).

    Thus, χHχIχJ=χHIJ.

    Case 2: Let lHIJ. This implies that χHIJ(l)=(0,0,...,0). Since, lghi for all gH,hI and iJ. Thus,

    (χHχIχJ)(l)=l=ghi{χH(g)χI(h)χJ(i)}
    =(0,0,...,0).

    Hence, χHχIχJ=χHIJ.

    Lemma 2. Consider a subset H of D. Then the following assertions are true.

    1) H is ternary subsemigroup of D if and only if χH is an m-PFTSS of D;

    2) H is an ideal of D if and only if χH is an m-PFI of D.

    Proof. (1) Consider, H is a ternary subsemigroup of D. We have to show that χH(ghi)χH(g)χH(h)χH(i) for all g,h,iD. We observe the following eight cases:

    Case 1: Let g,h,iH. Then χH(g)=(1,1,...,1)=χH(h)=χH(i). So, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(1,1,...,1). Since H is ternary subsemigroup of D, so ghiH implies that χH(ghi)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, χH(ghi)χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 2: Let g,hH and iH. Then χH(g)=χH(h)=(1,1,...,1) and χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0).

    Case 3: Let g,hH and iH. Then χH(g)=χH(h)=(0,0,...,0) and χH(i)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)(0,0,...,0)=χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 4: Let g,iH, and hH. Then χH(g)=χH(i)=(1,1,...,1), and χH(h)=(0,0,...,0). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)(0,0,...,0)=χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 5: Let g,iH and hH. Then χH(g)=χH(i)=(0,0,...,0) and χH(h)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)(0,0,...,0)=χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 6: Let h,iH and gH. Then χH(h)=χH(i)=(1,1,...,1) and χH(g)=(0,0,...,0). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)(0,0,...,0)=χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 7: Let h,iH and gH. Then χH(h)=χH(i)=(0,0,...,0) and χH(g)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)(0,0,...,0)=χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Case 8: Let g,h,iH. Then χH(g)=χH(h)=χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). This implies that, χH(g)χH(h)χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, χH(ghi)χH(g)χH(h)χH(i).

    Conversely, let χH is an m-PFTSS of D. Let g,h,iH. Then, χH(g)=χH(h)=χH(i)=(1,1,...,1). By definition, χH(ghi)=(1,1,...,1)χH(g)χH(h)χH(i) we have χH(ghi)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that ghiH, so H is a ternary subsemigroup of D.

    (2) Consider, H is a left ideal of D. We have to show that χH is an m-PFLI of D, that is χH(ghi)χH(i) for all g,h,iD. Now, we observe these two cases:

    Case 1: Let iHandg,hD. Then, χH(i)=(1,1,...,1). Since H is left ideal of D, so ghiH implies that χH(ghi)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, χH(ghi)χH(i).

    Case 2: Let iH and g,hD. Then χH(i)=(0,0,...,0). Clearly, χH(ghi)χH(i).

    Conversely, let χH is an m-PFLI of D. Assume that g,hD and iH. Then, χH(i)=(1,1,...,1). By definition, χH(ghi)χH(i)=(1,1,...,1), we have χH(ghi)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that ghiH, that is H is a left ideal of D.

    Similarly, we can prove for lateral ideal and right ideal of D.

    Lemma 3. Consider ψ is an m-PFS of D. Then the following properties hold.

    1) ψ is an m-PFTSS of D if and only if ψψψψ;

    2) ψ is an m-PFLI of D if and only if δδψψ;

    3) ψ is an m-PFMI of D if and only if δψδψ,δδψδδψ;

    4) ψ is an m-PFRI of D if and only if ψδδψ;

    5) ψ is an m-PFI of D if and only if δδψψ,δψδψ,ψδδψ, where δ is an m-PFS of D mapping every element of D on (1,1,...,1).

    Proof. (1) Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFTSS of D, that is ψκ(ghi)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Let lD. If l cannot be written as l=ghi for some g,h,iD then (ψψψ)(l)=0. Hence, ψψψψ. But if l is expressible as l=ghi for some g,h,iD, then

    (ψκψκψκ)(l)=l=ghi{ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, ψψψψ. Conversely, let ψψψψ and g,h,iD. Then for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    (ψκ)(ghi)(ψκψκψκ)(ghi)
    =ghi=bcd{ψκ(b)ψκ(c)ψκ(d)}ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i).

    Hence, ψ(ghi)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i). Thus, ψ is an m-PFTSS of D.

    (2) Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFLI of D that is, ψκ(ghi)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m}andg,h,iD. Let lD, if l cannot be written as l=ghi for some g,h,iD then (δδψ)(l)=0. Hence, δδψψ. But if l is expressible as l=ghi for some g,h,iD.

    (δκδκψκ)(l)=l=ghi{δκ(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{ψκ(i)}
    l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, δδψψ. Conversely, let δδψψ and g,h,iD. Then,

    ψκ(ghi)(δκδκψκ)(ghi)=ghi=bcd{δκ(b)δκ(c)ψκ(d)}
    δκ(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)
    ={(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(i)}
    =ψκ(i)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, (ghi)ψ(i). Thus ψ is an m-PFLI of D.

    Similarly, we can prove the parts (3),(4)and(5).

    Lemma 4. The following assertions are true in D.

    1) Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m), and =(1,2,...,m) be m-PFTSSs of D. Then ψ is also an m-PFTSS of D;

    2) Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m), and =(1,2,...,m) be m-PFIs of D. Then ψ is also an m-PFI of D.

    Proof. Straightforward.

    Proposition 1. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFTSS ( resp. m-PFI ) of D if and only if ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} is a ternary subsemigroup ( resp. ideal ) of D for all α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1].

    Proof: Let ψ be an m-PFTSS of D. Let g,h,iψα. Then ψκ(g)ακ,ψκ(h)ακ and ψκ(i)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Since, ψ is an m-PFTSS of D, we have

    ψκ(ghi)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)
    ακακακ=ακfor allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Thus, (ghi)ψα. Hence, ψα is a ternary subsemigroup of D.

    Conversely, let ψα is a ternary subsemigroup of D. On contrary assume that ψ is not an m-PFTSS of D. Suppose g,h,iD such that ψκ(ghi)<ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for some κ{1,2,...,m}. Take ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)=ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Then g,h,iψα but ghiψα, which is contradiction. Hence, ψκ(ghi)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i). Thus ψ is an m-PFTSS of D.

    Further cases can be prove on the same lines.

    Definition 5. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFS of D. Then ψ is called an m-PFGBI of D if for all g,d1,h,d2,iD,ψ(gd1hd2i)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i) that is ψκ(gd1hd2i)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Example 3. Let D={e,f,g,h,i} be a ternary semigroup and its multiplication table is defined in Table 6.

    Table 6.  Table of multiplication of D.
    e f g h i
    e e e e e e
    f e e h e f
    g e i e g e
    h e f e h e
    i e e g e i

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Let ψ={ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,ψ4} be a 4-PFS of D such that ψ(e)=(0.7,0.8,0.8,0.9),ψ(f)=(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4), ψ(g)=(0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5),ψ(h)=(0,0,0,0), ψ(i)=(0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6). Then simple calculations shows that ψ is a 4-PFGBI of D.

    Lemma 5. A subset H of D is a generalized bi-ideal of D if and only if χH is an m-PFGBI of D.

    Proof. The proof follows from the proof of Lemma 2.

    Lemma 6. An m-PFS ψ of D is an m-PFGBI of D if and only if ψδψδψψ, where δ is the m-PFS of D mapping every element of D on (1,1,...,1).

    Proof. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFGBI of D that is, ψκ(gd1hd2i)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m} and g,d1,h,d2,iD. Let lD, if l cannot be written as l=ghi for some g,h,iD then (ψδψδψ)(l)=(0,0,...,0). Hence, ψδψδψψ. Suppose l is expressible as l=ghi for some g,h,iD. Then

    ((ψκδκψκ)δκψκ)(l)=l=ghi{(ψκδκψκ)(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(d)δκ(e)ψκ(f)}δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(d)ψκ(f)}ψκ(i)}
    l=ghig=def{ψκ((def)hi)}
    =l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, (ψδψ)δψψ. Conversely, let (ψδψ)δψψ and g,h,iD. Then,

    ψκ((gd1h)d2i)((ψκδκψκ)δκψκ)((gd1h)d2i)
    =(gd1h)d2i=bcd{(ψκδκψκ)(b)δκ(c)ψκ(d)}(ψκδκψκ)(gd1h)δκ(d2)ψκ(i)
    =(ψκδκψκ)(gd1h)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(i)
    =gd1h=lmn{ψκ(l)δκ(m)ψκ(n)}ψκ(i)
    =gd1h=lmn{ψκ(l)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(n)}ψκ(i)
    {ψκ(g)ψκ(h)}ψκ(i)
    =ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, ψ(gd1hd2i)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i). Thus ψ is an m-PFGBI of D.

    Proposition 2. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,....,ψm) be an m-PFS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFGBI of D if and only if ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} is a generalized bi-ideal of D for all α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1]m.

    Proof. Suppose ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,....,ψm) is an m-PFGBI of D. Let g,h,iψα and d1,d2D. Then, ψκ(g)ακ,ψκ(h)ακ and ψκ(i)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Since, ψ is an m-PFGBI of D, so

    ψκ(gd1hd2i)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)
    ακακακ=ακfor allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Thus gd1hd2iψα, that is ψα is a generalized bi-ideal of D.

    Conversely, let ψα is a generalized bi-ideal of D. On contrary suppose that ψ is not an m-PFGBI of D. Let g,d1,h,d2,iD such that ψκ(gd1hd2i)<ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for some κ{1,2,...,m}. Take ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i)=ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Then g,d1,h,d2,iψα but (gd1hd2i)ψα which is a contradiction. Thus, ψκ(gd1hd2i)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i). Hence ψ is an m-PFGBI of D.

    Definition 7. An m-PFTSS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) of D is called an m-PFBI of D if for all g,d1,h,d2,iD,ψ(gd1hd2i)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i) that is ψκ(gd1hd2i)ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i) for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Lemma 7. A subset H of D is a BI of D if and only if χH the m-polar characteristic function of H is an m-PFBI of D.

    Proof. Follows from Lemmas 2 and 5.

    Lemma 8. An m-PFTSS ψ of D is an m-PFBI of D if and only if ψψψψ and ψδψδψψ.

    Proof. Follows from Lemmas 3 and 6.

    Proposition 3. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,....,ψm) be an m-PFTSS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFBI of D if and only if ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} is a bi-ideal of D for all α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1]m.

    Proof. Follows from Propositions 1 and 2.

    Remark 1. Every m-PFBI of D is an m-PFGBI of D.

    The Example 4 proves that the converse of the Remark 1 may not be true.

    Example 4. Consider D={e,f,g,h,i} is a ternary semigroup as given in Example.3 and ψ={ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,ψ4} is 4-PFGBI of D. Then simple calculations shows that ψ is not a bi-ideal of D as ψ(h)=ψ(fig)=(0,0,0,0)(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4)=ψ(f)ψ(i)ψ(g).

    Definition 8. An m-PFS ψ of D is called an m-PFQI of D if (ψδδ)(δψδ)(δδψ)ψ,(ψδδ)(δδψδδ)(δδψ)ψ that is (ψκδκδκ)(δκψκδκ)(δκδκψκ)ψκ and (ψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκ)ψκ for all κ{1,2,...,m}, where δ is fuzzy subset of D mapping every element of D on (1,1,...,1).

    Example 5. Let D={e,f,g,h} be a ternary semigroup and its multiplication table is defined in Table 7.

    Table 7.  Table of multiplication of D.
    e f g h
    e e e e e
    f e f g h
    g e g e g
    h e h e e

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Define a 5-PFS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,ψ4,ψ5) of D as follows: ψ(e)=ψ(g)=(0.9,0.8,0.7,0.7,0.6), ψ(f)=(0.3,0.2,0.2,0.1,0.3),ψ(h)=(0,0,0,0,0). Then simple calculations proves that ψα is a quasi-ideal of D. As the result of Proposition 4, ψ is a 5-PFQI of D.

    Lemma 9. Let H be a subset of D. Then H is a quasi-ideal of D if and only if the m-polar characteristic function χH of H is an m-PFQI of D.

    Proof. Let H be a quasi-ideal of D that is HDDDHDDDHH,HDDDDHDDDDHH. Now we have to show that, (χHδδ)(δχHδ)(δδχH)χH, (χHδδ)(δδχHδδ)(δδχH)χH that is ((χHδδ)(δχHδ)(δδχH))(l)χH(l) and ((χHδδ)(δδχHδδ)(δδχH))(l)χH(l). This implies that (χHδδ)(l)(δχHδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)χH(l) and (χHδδ)(l)(δδχHδδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)χH(l) for all lD.

    We observe the following two cases:

    Case 1: If lH then χH(l)=(1,1,...,1)((χHδδ)(δχHδ)(δδχH))(l). So, (χHδδ)(l)(δχHδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)χH(l). Also, ((χHδδ)(δδχHδδ)(δδχH))(l)χH(l). Hence, (χHδδ)(l)(δδχHδδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)χH(l).

    Case 2: If lH then lHDDDHDDDH. This implies that lmuv or lwnx or lyzo for some m,n,oH and u,v,w,x,y,zD. Thus either (χHδδ)(l)=(0,0,...,0) or (δχHδ)(l)=(0,0,...,0) or (δδχH)(l)=(0,0,...,0) that is (χHδδ)(l)(δχHδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)=(0,0,...,0)χH(l). Hence (χHδδ)(δχHδ)(δδχH)χH.

    Also, if lH then lHDDDDHDDDDH. This implies that lmst or luvnwx or lyzg for some m,n,oH and s,t,u,v,w,x,y,zD. Thus either (χHδδ)(l)=(0,0,...,0) or (δδχHδδ)(l)=(0,0,...,0) or (δδχH)(l)=(0,0,...,0) that is (χHδδ)(l)(δδχHδδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)=(0,0,...,0)χH(l). Hence, (χHδδ)(δδχHδδ)(δδχH)χH.

    Conversely, let lHDDDHDDDH and lHDDDDHDDDDH.

    Firstly, if lHDDDHDDDH then l=muv,l=wnx,l=yzo for all m,n,oH and u,v,w,x,y,zD. As χH is an m-PFQI of D. We have

    χH(l)((χHδδ)(δχHδ)(δδχH))(l)=(χHδδ)(l)(δχHδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)
    ={l=muv{χH(m)δ(u)δ(v)}}{l=wnx{δ(w)χH(n)δ(x)}}{l=yzo{δ(y)δ(z)χH(o)}}
    {χH(m)δ(u)δ(v)}{δ(w)χH(n)δ(x)}{δ(y)δ(z)χH(o)}
    =(1,1,...,1).

    Thus, χH(l)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, lH. So, HDDDHDDDHH.

    Now, secondly if lHDDDDHDDDDH then l=mst,l=uvnwx,l=yzo for all m,n,oH and s,t,u,v,w,x,y,zD. As χH is an m-PFQI of D, we have

    χH(l)((χHδδ)(δδχHδδ)(δδχH))(l)
    =(χHδδ)(l)(δδχHδδ)(l)(δδχH)(l)
    ={l=mst{χH(m)δ(s)δ(t)}}{l=uvnwx{δ(u)δ(v)χH(n)δ(w)δ(x)}}
    {l=yzo{δ(y)δ(z)χH(o)}}
    {χH(m)δ(s)δ(t)}{δ(u)δ(v)χH(n)δ(w)δ(x)}{δ(y)δ(z)χH(o)}
    =(1,1,...,1).

    Thus, χH(l)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, lH. So, HDDDDHDDDDHH. This shows that H is a quasi-ideal of D.

    Proposition 4. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFQI of D if and only if ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} is a QI of D for all α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1]m.

    Proof. Consider ψ is an m-PFQI of D. To show that ψαDDDψαDDDψαψα and ψαDDDDψαDDDDψαψα.

    Firstly, let lψαDDDψαDDDψα. Then lψαDD,lDψαD and lDDψα. So, l=muv,l=wnx,l=yzo for some u,v,w,x,y,zD and m,n,o(ψκ)ακ. Thus, ψκ(m)ακ,ψκ(n)ακ and ψκ(o)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (ψκδκδκ)(l)=l=muv{ψκ(m)δκ(u)δκ(v)}
    ψκ(m)δκ(u)δκ(v)
    =ψκ(m)(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)
    =ψκ(m)
    ακ.

    So, (ψκδκδκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (δκψκδκ)(l)=l=wnx{δκ(w)ψκ(n)δκ(x)}
    δκ(w)ψκ(n)δκ(x)
    =(1,1,...,1)ψκ(n)(1,1,...,1)
    =ψκ(n)
    ακ.

    So, (δκψκδκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (δκδκψκ)(l)=l=yzo{δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)}
    δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)
    =(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(o)
    =ψκ(o)
    ακ.

    So, (δκδκψκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Thus,

    ((ψκδκδκ)(δκψκδκ)(δκδκψκ))(l)
    =(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκψκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l)ακακακ
    =ακfor allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    So, ψ(l)((ψδδ)(δψδ)(δδψ))(l)α. This implies that lψα. Hence, ψα is a quasi-ideal of D.

    Now secondly, let lψαDDDDψαDDDDψα. Then lψαDD,lDDψαDD,lDDψα. So l=mst,l=uvnwx, l=yzo for some s,t,u,v,w,x,y,zD and m,n,oψα. Thus, ψκ(m)ακ,ψκ(n)ακ, and ψκ(o)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (ψκδκδκ)(l)=l=mst{ψκ(m)δκ(s)δκ(t)}
    ψκ(m)δκ(s)δκ(t)
    =ψκ(m)(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)
    =ψκ(m)
    ακ.

    So, (ψκδκδκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (δκδκψκδκδκ)(l)=l=uvnwx{δκ(u)δκ(v)ψκ(n)δκ(w)δκ(x)}
    δκ(u)δκ(v)ψκ(n)δκ(w)δκ(x)
    =ψκ(n)ακ.

    Thus, (δκδκψκδκδκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Now,

    (δκδκψκ)(l)=l=yzo{δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)}
    {δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)}
    ={(1,1,...,1)(1,1,...,1)ψκ(o)}
    =ψκ(o)
    ακ.

    So, (δκδκψκ)(l)ακ for all κ{1,2,...,m}. Thus,

    ((ψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκ))(l)
    =(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l)
    ακακακ
    =ακfor allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    So, ((ψδδ)(δδψδδ)(δδψ))(l)α. Since, ψ(l)((ψδδ)(δδψδδ)(δδψ))(l)α. So, lψα.

    Conversely, on contrary consider that ψ is not an m-PFQI of D. Let lD be such that ψκ(l)<(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκψκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l) for some κ{1,2,...,m}. Choose ακ(0,1] such that ακ=(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκψκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l) for all κ{1,2,...,m}. This implies that l(ψκδκδκ)ακ,l(δκψκδκ)ακ and l(δκδκψκ)ακ but l(ψκ)ακ for some κ. Hence, l(ψδδ)α,l(δψδ)α and l(δδψ)α but l(ψ)α, which is a contradiction. Hence, (ψδδ)(δψδ)(δδψ)ψ.

    Also, on contrary consider that ψ is not an m-PFQI of D. Let lD be such that ψκ(l)<(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l) for some κ{1,2,...,m}. Choose ακ(0,1] such that ακ=(ψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(l)(δκδκψκ)(l) for all κ{1,2,...,m}. This implies that, l(ψκδκδκ)ακ,l(δκδκψκδκδκ)ακ and l(δκδκψκ)ακ but l(ψκ)ακ for some κ. Hence, l(ψδδ)α,l(δδψδδ)α and l(δδψ)α but l(ψ)α, which is a contradiction. Hence, (ψδδ)(δδψδδ)(δδψ)ψ.

    Lemma 10. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m),=(1,2,...,m) be m-PFRI, m-PFMI and m-PFLI of D respectively. Then ψ is an m-PFQI of D.

    Proof. Suppose ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m),=(1,2,...,m) is m-PFRI, m-PFMI and m-PFLI of D respectively. Let lD, if lghi for some g,h,iD. Then, ((ψ)δδ)(δ(ψ)δ)(δδ(ψ))ψ. If l=ghi for some g,h,iD. Then,

    ((ψκκκ)δκδκ)(δκ(ψκκκ)δκ)(δκδκ(ψκκκ))(l)
    =((ψκκκ)δκδκ)(l)(δκ(ψκκκ)δκ)(l)(δκδκ(ψκκκ))(l)
    ={l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(g)δκ(h)δκ(i)}}{l=ghi{δκ(g)(ψκκκ)(h)δκ(i)}}
    {l=ghi{δκ(g)δκ(h)(ψκκκ)(i)}}
    ={l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(g)}}{l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(h)}}{l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(i)}}
    =l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(g)(ψκκκ)(h)(ψκκκ)(i)}
    =l=ghi{ψκ(g)κ(g)κ(g)ψκ(h)κ(h)κ(h)ψκ(i)κ(i)κ(i)}
    l=ghi{ψκ(g)κ(h)κ(i)}
    l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)κ(ghi)κ(ghi)}
    =l=ghi{(ψκκκ)(ghi)}
    =(ψκκκ)(l)forallκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, ((ψ)δδ)(δ(ψ)δ)(δδ(ψ))(ψ), that is (ψ) is an m-PFQI of D. Similarly, ((ψ)δδ)(δδ(ψ)δδ)(δδ(ψ))(ψ). Hence, (ψ) is an m-PFQI of D.

    Lemma 11. Every m-PF one-sided ideal of D is an m-PFQI of D.

    Proof. The proof follows from Lemma 3.

    In the Example 6, it is shown that the converse of the Lemma 11 may not be true.

    Example 6. Consider D={e,f,g,h} is a ternary semigroup in Example 5 and ψ is a 5-PFQI of D. Now, by calculations ψ(fhh)=ψ(h)=(0,0,0,0,0)̸ψ(f)=(0.3,0.2,0.3,0.1,0.3). So, ψ is not a 5-PFRI of D.

    Definition 9. An m-PFTSS ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) of D is called an m-PFII of D if for all g,h,l,i,jD,ψ(ghlij)ψ(l) that is, ψκ(ghlij)ψκ(l) for all κ{1,2,...,m}.

    Lemma 12. Let H be a subset of D. Then H is an interior ideal of D if and only if m-polar characteristic function χH of H is an m-PFII of D.

    Proof. Consider H is an interior ideal of D. From Lemma 2, χH is an m-PFTSS of D. Thus, we have to show that χH((ghl)ij)χH(l) for all g,h,l,i,jD. We observe these two cases:

    Case 1: Let lH and g,h,i,jD. Then χH(l)=(1,1,...,1). Since, H is an interior ideal of D. So, (ghlij)H. Then χH(ghlij)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, χH(ghlij)χH(l).

    Case 2: Let lH, and g,h,i,jD. Then χH(l)=(0,0,...,0). Clearly, χH(ghlij)χH(l). Hence, the m- polar characteristic function χH of H is an m-PFII of D.

    Conversely, let χH is an m-PFII of D. Then by Lemma 2, H is a ternary subsemigroup of D. Suppose g,h,i,jD, and lH then χH(l)=(1,1,...,1). By the hypothesis, χH(ghlij)χH(l)=(1,1,...,1). Hence, χH(ghlij)=(1,1,...,1). This implies that (ghlij)H, that is H is an interior ideal of D.

    Lemma 13. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFTSS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFII of D if and only if δδψδδψ.

    Proof. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFII of D. We have to show that, ((δδψ)δδ)ψ. Let lD. Then,

    ((δκδκψκ)δκδκ)(l)=l=ghi{(δκδκψκ)(g)δκ(h)δκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{g=def{δκ(d)δκ(e)ψκ(f)}}
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(f)}}
    =l=(def)hi{ψκ(f)}
    l=(def)hi{ψκ((def)hi)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Thus, (δδψδδ)ψ. Conversely, let (δδψδδ)ψ. We only have to show that ψκ(ghlij)ψκ(l) for all g,h,l,i,jD and κ{1,2,...,m}.

    ψκ((ghl)ij)((δκδκψκ)δκδκ)((ghl)ij)
    =(ghl)ij=bcd{(δκδκψκ)(b)δκ(c)δκ(d)}
    {(δκδκψκ)(ghl)δκ(i)δκ(j)}
    =(δκδκψκ)(ghl)
    =ghl=uvw{δκ(u)δκ(v)ψκ(w)}
    {δκ(g)δκ(h)ψκ(l)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    So, (ghlij)ψ(l). Hence, ψ is an m-PFII of D.

    Proposition 4. Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFS of D. Then ψ is an m-PFII of D if and only if ψα={lD|ψ(l)α} is an interior ideal of D for all α=(α1,α2,...,αm)(0,1]m.

    Proof. The proof is same as the proof of Propositions 1 and 2.

    In this section, various important results of regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups under the m-PFSs, m-PFIs of D are presented. Many theorems of Shabir et al. [34]. Bashir et al. [35] are examined and generalized in the form of m-PFIs of D. Regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups have been studied by several authors see [6,38,41].

    Definition 10. An element l of D is called regular if there exists y,zD such that l=lylzl. D is regular if all elements of D are regular [6].

    Theorem 1. [38] The listed below assertions are equivalent for D.

    1) D is regular;

    2) HIJ=HIJ for all left ideal H, all lateral ideal I and all right ideal J of D;

    3) H=HDHDH for all quasi ideal H of D.

    Theorem 2. Every m-PFQI of D is an m-PFBI of D.

    Proof. Suppose ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) is an m-PFQI of D. Let g,h,iD. Then

    ψκ(ghi)((ψκδκδκ)(δκψκδκ)(δκδκψκ))(ghi)
    =(ψκδκδκ)(ghi)(δκψκδκ)(ghi)(δκδκψκ)(ghi)={ghi=uvm{ψκ(u)δκ(v)δκ(m)}}{ghi=wnx{δκ(w)ψκ(n)δκ(x)}}
    {ghi=yzo{δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)}}
    {ψκ(g)δκ(h)δκ(i)}{δκ(g)ψκ(h)δκ(i)}{δκ(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i).

    So, ψ(ghi)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i). Also,

    ψκ(gd1hd2i)((ψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(δκδκψκ))(gd1hd2i)=(ψκδκΛκ)(gd1hd2i)(δκδκψκδκδκ)(gd1hd2i)(δκδκψκ)(gd1hd2i)
    ={gd1hd2i=mst{ψκ(m)δκ(s)δκ(t)}}
    {gd1hd2i=uvnwx{δκ(u)δκ(v)ψκ(n)δκ(w)δκ(x)}}
    {gd1hd2i=yzo{δκ(y)δκ(z)ψκ(o)}}
    {ψκ(g)δκ(d1hd2)δκ(i)}{δκ(g)δκ(d1)ψκ(h)δκ(d2)δκ(i)}
    {δκ(g)δκ(d1hd2)ψκ(i)}
    =ψκ(g)ψκ(h)ψκ(i).

    So, ψ(gd1hd2i)ψ(g)ψ(h)ψ(i). Hence, ψ is an m-PFBI of D.

    Theorem 3. For D the given conditions are equivalent.

    1) D is regular;

    2) ψ=ψ for all m-PFRI ψ, all m-PFMI and all m-PFLI of D.

    Proof. (1)(2): Suppose that ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m),=(1,2,...,m) is m-PFRI, m-PFMI and m-PFLI of D respectively. Let lD, we have

    (ψκκκ)(l)=l=ghi{ψκ(g)κ(h)κ(i)}
    l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)κ(ghi)κ(ghi)}
    =ψκ(l)κ(l)κ(l)
    =(ψκκκ)(l).

    Hence, (ψκκκ)(l)(ψκκκ)(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}. So, (ψ)(ψ). Since D is regular, so for all lD there exists y,zD such that l=lylzl.

    (ψκκκ)(l)=l=ghi{ψκ(g)κ(h)κ(i)}
    ψκ(l)κ(ylz)κ(l)
    ψκ(l)κ(l)κ(l)
    =(ψκκκ)(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Thus, (ψ)(ψ). Therefore, (ψ)=(ψ).

    (2)(1): Let lD. Then H=lDD is a left ideal of D,I=DlD is a lateral ideal of D and J=DDl is a right ideal of D. Then by using Lemma 2, χH,χI,χJ, the m- polar characteristic function of H,I,J are m-PFLI, m-PFMI and m-PFRI of D respectively. Now, by given condition

    χHχIχJ=χHχIχJχHIJ=χHIJby Lemma1.

    Thus, HIJ=HIJ. Hence, it follows from Theorem 1 that D is regular.

    Theorem 4. For D the listed below conditions are equivalent.

    1) D is regular;

    2) ψ=ψδψδψ for every m-PFGBI ψ of D;

    3) ψ=ψδψδψ for every m-PFQI ψ of D.

    Proof. (1)(2): Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm) be an m-PFGBI of D and lD. As D is regular, so there exist y,zD such that l=lylzl. So, we have

    ((ψκΛκψκ)δκψκ)(l)=l=ghi{(ψκδκψκ)(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    (ψκδκψκ)(lyl)δκ(z)ψκ(l)
    =lyl=def{ψκ(d)δκ(e)ψκ(f)}ψκ(l)
    ψκ(l)δκ(y)ψκ(l)ψκ(l)
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    Hence, ψδψδψψ. Since, ψ is an m-PFGBI of D. So, we have

    ((ψκδκψκ)δκψκ)(l)=l=ghi{(ψκδκψκ)(g)δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(d)δκ(e)ψκ(f)}δκ(h)ψκ(i)}
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(d)(1,1,,1)ψκ(f)}(1,1,...,1)ψκ(i)
    =l=ghi{g=def{ψκ(d)ψκ(f)}ψκ(i)}
    l=ghi{g=def{ψκ((def)hi)}}
    l=ghi{ψκ(ghi)}
    =ψκ(l)for allκ{1,2,...,m}.

    So, ψδψδψψ. Thus ψδψδψ=ψ.

    (2)(3): It is obvious.

    (3)(1): Let ψ=(ψ1,ψ2,...,ψm),=(1,2,...,m),=(1,2,...,m) be m-PFRI, m-PFMI and m-PFLI of D respectively. Then (ψ) is an m-PFQI of D. Then by hypothesis,

    (ψκκκ)=(ψκκκ)δκ(ψκκκ)δκ(ψκκκ)
    ψκδκκδκκ=ψκκκ.

    So, ψκκκψκκκ. But, ψκκκψκκκ. This implies that ψκκκ=ψκκκ. That is ψ=ψ. Thus D is regular ternary semigroup by Theorem 3.

    Definition 11. An element l of D is called intra-regular if there exists y,zD such that l=yl3z. D is intra-regular if all elements of D are intra-regular [41].

    Theorem 5. [41] If D is an intra-regular ternary semigroup then H\cap I\cap J\subseteq HIJ for any left ideal H , lateral ideal I and right ideal J of D .

    Theorem 6. D is intra-regular if and only if \psi \wedge \daleth \wedge \mho \le \psi \circ \daleth \circ \mho for every m -PFLI \psi , \mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y}m -PFMI \daleth and every m -PFRI \mho of D.

    Proof. Suppose, \psi = \left({\psi }_{1}, {\psi }_{2}, ..., {\psi }_{m}\right), \daleth = \left({\daleth }_{1}, {\daleth }_{2}, ..., {\daleth }_{m}\right), \mho = \left({\mho }_{1}, {\mho }_{2}, ..., {\mho }_{m}\right) is m -PFLI, m -PFMI and m -PFRI of D respectively. Let l\in D . Then, there exists y, z\in D such that l = y{l}^{3}z = y\left(y{l}^{3}z\right)\left(y{l}^{3}z\right)\left(y{l}^{3}z\right)z . Thus

    \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\circ {\daleth }_{\kappa }\circ {\mho }_{\kappa }\right)\left(l\right) = {\vee }_{l = ghi}\left\{{\psi }_{\kappa }\left(g\right)\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\left(h\right)\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\left(i\right)\right\}
    \ge {\psi }_{\kappa }\left(yy{l}^{3}\right)\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\left(zy{l}^{3}zy\right)\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\left({l}^{3}zz\right)
    \ge {\psi }_{\kappa }\left({l}^{3}\right)\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\left({l}^{3}\right)\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\left({l}^{3}\right)
    = {\psi }_{\kappa }\left(lll\right)\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\left(lll\right)\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\left(lll\right)
    \ge {\psi }_{\kappa }\left(l\right)\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\left(l\right)\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\left(l\right)
    = \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\right)\left(l\right)\;\text{for all}\;\kappa \in \left\{\mathrm{1, 2}, ..., m\right\}.

    So, \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\circ {\daleth }_{\kappa }\circ {\mho }_{\kappa }\right)\ge \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\right) . That is \psi \wedge \daleth \wedge \mho \le \psi \circ \daleth \circ \mho .

    Conversely, suppose that \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\circ {\daleth }_{\kappa }\circ {\mho }_{\kappa }\right)\ge \left({\psi }_{\kappa }\wedge {\daleth }_{\kappa }\wedge {\mho }_{\kappa }\right), for m -PFLI \psi , m -PFMI \daleth and m -PFRI \mho of D . Let H, I, J are left, lateral and right ideal of D . Then by using Lemma 2, {\chi }_{H}, {\chi }_{I}, {\chi }_{J} the m - polar characteristic functions of H, I, J are m -PFLI, m -PFMI and m -PFRI of D, respectively. Now, by our supposition

    \begin{array}{l} {\chi }_{H}\wedge {\chi }_{I}\wedge {\chi }_{J}\le {\chi }_{H}\circ {\chi }_{I}\\ \circ {\chi }_{J} {\chi }_{H\cap I\cap J}\le {\chi }_{HIJ}\;\text{by Lemma}\;1 . \end{array}

    Thus, H\cap I\cap J\subseteq HIJ . Therefore by Theorem 5, D is intra-regular.

    In the current section, we will describe a connection between this paper and previous papers [34,35]. Shabir et al. [34] worked on m -PFIs and m -PFBIs for the characterizations of regular LA-semigroups. Bashir et al. generalized [34] to [35]. We have extended this work to the structure of m -PFIs of ternary semigroups, regular ternary semigroups and intra-regular ternary semigroups. Our results are more general than the results in [34,35] because associative property does not hold in LA-semigroup. For example let \psi \left(ghi\right) = g is not an LA-semigroup but it is ternary semigroup. Also, there are many structures that are not handled by binary multiplication but handled by ternary multiplication, such as {Z}^{-}, {R}^{-} and {Q}^{-} . To get rid of this difficulty, we operate the ternary operation, and generalize all results in ternary semigroups. Hence, the technique used in this paper is more general than previous.

    The definition of an m -PF set is applied to the structure of ternary semigroups in this paper. When data comes from m factors then m -PF set theory is used to deal such problems. We have converted the basic algebraic structure of [34,35] to ternary semigroup by using m -PF set. A huge number of uses and needs of ternary operation of m -PF set theory are given in this paper. Also, it is proved that every m -polar fuzzy bi-ideal of ternary semigroup is an m -polar fuzzy generalized bi-ideal of ternary semigroup but converse is not true in general shown by example. We have studied the characterization of regular and intra-regular ternary semigroups by m -PFIs.

    In future, we will apply this technique for gamma semigroups and near rings. Thus, the roughness of m -PFIs of ternary semigroups, gamma semigroups and near-rings will be defined.

    This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. (19-130-35-RG). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge DSR technical and financial support.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



    [1] S. S. Raju, K. V. R. Srinivas, Ternary semigroup of a lattice, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 119 (2018), 115–121.
    [2] D. H. Lehmer, A ternary analogue of abelian groups, Amer. J. Math., 54 (1932), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2370997 doi: 10.2307/2370997
    [3] A. Chronowski, Ternary semigroups and ternary algebras, In: Functional equations in mathematical analysis, New York: Springer, 2011,371–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0055-4_28
    [4] M. L. Santiago, S. S. Bala, Ternary semigroups, Semigroup Forum, 81 (2010), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-010-9254-x doi: 10.1007/s00233-010-9254-x
    [5] J. Los, On the extending of models (Ⅰ), Fund. Math., 42 (1955), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-42-1-38-54 doi: 10.4064/fm-42-1-38-54
    [6] F. M. Sioson, Ideal theory in ternary semigroups, Math. Japon, 10 (1965), 63.
    [7] S. Bashir, M. Shabir, Prime left ideals in ternary semigroups, J. Adv. Res. Pure Math., 1 (2009), 1–13.
    [8] S. Bashir, M. Shabir, N. Rehman, Pure fuzzy ideals in ternary semigroups, Int. J. Algebra Stat., 1 (2012), 1–7.
    [9] S. Bashir, M. Shabir, Pure ideals in ternary semigroups, Quasigroups Related Syst., 17 (2009), 111–122.
    [10] M. Shabir, S. Bashir, Prime ideals in ternary semigroups, Asian-Eur. J. Math, 2 (2009), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557109000121 doi: 10.1142/S1793557109000121
    [11] S. Bashir, X. K. Du, On weakly regular fuzzy ordered ternary semigroups, Appl. Math. Inform. Sci., 10 (2016), 2247–2254. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/100627 doi: 10.18576/amis/100627
    [12] S. Bashir, X. K. Du, Intra-regular and weakly regular ordered ternary semigroups, Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform., 13 (2017), 539–551.
    [13] S. Bashir, M. Fatima, M. Shabir, Regular ordered ternary semigroups in terms of bipolar fuzzy ideals, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030233 doi: 10.3390/math7030233
    [14] S. Bashir, R. Mazhar, H. Abbas, M. Shabir, Regular ternary semirings in terms of bipolar fuzzy ideals, Comp. Appl. Math., 39 (2020), 319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01319-z doi: 10.1007/s40314-020-01319-z
    [15] S. Bashir, H. Abbas, R. Mazhar, M. Shabir, Rough fuzzy ternary subsemigroups based on fuzzy ideals with three-dimensional congruence relation, Comp. Appl. Math., 39 (2020), 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-1079-y doi: 10.1007/s40314-020-1079-y
    [16] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [17] M. Shabir, S. Liaquat, S. Bashir, Regular and intra-regular semirings in terms of bipolar fuzzy ideals, Comp. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0974-6 doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0974-6
    [18] M. Shabir, T. Abbas, S. Bashir, R. Mazhar, Bipolar fuzzy hyperideals in regular and intra-regular semihypergroups, Comp. Appl. Math., 40 (2021), 196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01574-8 doi: 10.1007/s40314-021-01574-8
    [19] M. Saqib, M. Akram, S. Bashir, Certain efficient iterative methods for bipolar fuzzy system of linear equations, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 39 (2020), 3971–3985. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200084 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-200084
    [20] M. Saqib, M. Akram, S. Bashir, T. Allahviranloo, Numerical solution of bipolar fuzzy initial value problem, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 40 (2021), 1309–1341. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-201619 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-201619
    [21] M. Saqib, M. Akram, S. Bashir, T. Allahviranloo, A Runge-Kutta numerical method to approximate the solution of bipolar fuzzy initial value problems, Comp. Appl. Math., 40 (2021), 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01535-1 doi: 10.1007/s40314-021-01535-1
    [22] M. A. Mehmood, M. Akram, M. G. Alharbi, S. Bashir, Optimization of LR-type fully bipolar fuzzy linear programming problems, Math. Prob. Eng., 2021 (2021), 1199336. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1199336 doi: 10.1155/2021/1199336
    [23] M. A. Mehmood, M. Akram, M. G. Alharbi, S. Bashir, Solution of fully bipolar fuzzy linear programming models, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 996189. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9961891 doi: 10.1155/2021/9961891
    [24] A. Mahboob, G. Muhiuddin, A new type of fuzzy prime subset in ordered semigroups, New Math. Nat. Comput., 17 (2021), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005721500368 doi: 10.1142/S1793005721500368
    [25] J. J. Chen, S. G. Li, S. Q. Ma, X. P. Wang, m-Polar fuzzy sets: An extension of bipolar fuzzy sets, Sci. World J., 2014 (2014), 416530. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/416530 doi: 10.1155/2014/416530
    [26] M. Sarwar, M. Akram, New applications of m-polar fuzzy matroids, Symmetry, 9 (2017), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120319 doi: 10.3390/sym9120319
    [27] A. Al-Masarwah, m-polar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras, J. King Saud Univ.-Sci., 31 (2019), 1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2018.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2018.10.002
    [28] A. N. A. S. Al-Masarwah, A. G. Ahmad, A new form of generalized m-PF ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras, Ann. Commun. Math., 2 (2019), 11–16.
    [29] A. Al-Masarwah, A. G. Ahmad, m-Polar (α, β)-fuzzy ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 44. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010044 doi: 10.3390/sym11010044
    [30] A. Al-Masarwah, On (complete) normality of m-PF subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras, AIMS Mathematics, 4 (2019), 740–750. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2019.3.740 doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3
    [31] G. Muhiuddin, M. M. Takallo, R. A. Borzooei, Y. B. Jun, m-polar fuzzy q-ideals in BCI-algebras, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 32 (2020), 2803–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.07.001
    [32] G. Muhiuddin, D. Al-Kadi, A. Mahboob, A. Albjedi, Interval-valued m-polar fuzzy positive implicative ideals in BCK-algebras, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 1042091. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1042091 doi: 10.1155/2021/1042091
    [33] G. Muhiuddin, D. Al-Kadi, Interval valued m-polar fuzzy BCK/BCI-algebras, Int. J. Comput. Intell., 14 (2021), 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210223.003 doi: 10.2991/ijcis.d.210223.003
    [34] M. Shabir, M. Aslam, F. Pervaiz, m-polar fuzzy ideals in LA-semigroups, (submitted for publication).
    [35] S. Bashir, S. Shahzadi, A. N. Al-Kenani, M. Shabir, Regular and intra-regular semigroups in terms of m-polar fuzzy environment, Mathematic, 9 (2021), 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172031 doi: 10.3390/math9172031
    [36] M. Shabir, Y. Nawaz, M. Aslam, Semigroups characterized by the properties of their fuzzy ideals with thresholds, World Appl. Sci. J., 14 (2021), 1851–1865.
    [37] G. Mohanraj, M. Vela, On generalized fuzzy generalized fuzzy Bi-ideals of ternary semigroups, Bull. Int. Math. Virtual Inst., 9 (2019), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.7251/BIMVI1903441M doi: 10.7251/BIMVI1903441M
    [38] N. Rehman, M. Shabir, Characterizations of Ternary Semigroups by \left({\alpha, \beta } \right)-fuzzy Ideals, World Appl. Sci. J, 18 (2012), 1556–1570. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.11.596 doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.11.596
    [39] E. H. Hamouda, A study on anti fuzzy interior ideals of ternary semigroups, Asian J. Fuzzy Appl. Math., 2 (2014), 83–88.
    [40] D. T. Ho, J. M. Garibaldi, Context modelling in fuzzy systems, In: WCCI 2012 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 2012, Brisbane, Australia.
    [41] V. R. Daddi, Intra-regular ternary semigroups, Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math., 13 (2017), 7689–7694.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Shahida Bashir, Mohammed M. Ali Al-Shamiri, Shahzeen Khalid, Rabia Mazhar, Regular and Intra-Regular Ternary Semirings in Terms of m-Polar Fuzzy Ideals, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 591, 10.3390/sym15030591
    2. Shahida Bashir, Talal Alharbi, Rabia Mazhar, Issra Khalid, Muneeb ul Hassan Afzal, Nauman Riaz Chaudhry, An efficient approach to study multi-polar fuzzy ideals of semirings, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-49395-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(11843) PDF downloads(77) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog