Research article

Characterizations of local Lie derivations on von Neumann algebras

  • Received: 21 October 2021 Revised: 13 December 2021 Accepted: 21 December 2021 Published: 14 February 2022
  • MSC : 46L50, 46L57, 47L35

  • In this paper, we prove that every local Lie derivation on von Neumann algebras is a Lie derivation; and we show that if M is a type I von Neumann algebra with an atomic lattice of projections, then every local Lie derivation on LS(M) is a Lie derivation.

    Citation: Guangyu An, Xueli Zhang, Jun He, Wenhua Qian. Characterizations of local Lie derivations on von Neumann algebras[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7519-7527. doi: 10.3934/math.2022422

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohd Arif Raza, Aisha Jabeen, Abdul Nadim Khan, Husain Alhazmi . Linear maps on von Neumann algebras acting as Lie type derivation via local actions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8453-8465. doi: 10.3934/math.2021490
    [2] Shan Li, Kaijia Luo, Jiankui Li . Generalized Lie n-derivations on generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29386-29403. doi: 10.3934/math.20241424
    [3] Xinfeng Liang, Mengya Zhang . Triangular algebras with nonlinear higher Lie n-derivation by local actions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2549-2583. doi: 10.3934/math.2024126
    [4] Dan Liu, Jianhua Zhang, Mingliang Song . Local Lie derivations of generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6900-6912. doi: 10.3934/math.2023349
    [5] Liang Kong, Chao Li . Non-global nonlinear skew Lie triple derivations on factor von Neumann algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 13963-13976. doi: 10.3934/math.2022771
    [6] Junyuan Huang, Xueqing Chen, Zhiqi Chen, Ming Ding . On a conjecture on transposed Poisson n-Lie algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6709-6733. doi: 10.3934/math.2024327
    [7] He Yuan, Zhuo Liu . Lie n-centralizers of generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14609-14622. doi: 10.3934/math.2023747
    [8] Wenbo Huang, Jiankui Li, Shaoze Pan . Some zero product preserving additive mappings of operator algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22213-22224. doi: 10.3934/math.20241080
    [9] He Yuan, Qian Zhang, Zhendi Gu . Characterizations of generalized Lie n-higher derivations on certain triangular algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 29916-29941. doi: 10.3934/math.20241446
    [10] Senrong Xu, Wei Wang, Jia Zhao . Twisted Rota-Baxter operators on Hom-Lie algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2619-2640. doi: 10.3934/math.2024129
  • In this paper, we prove that every local Lie derivation on von Neumann algebras is a Lie derivation; and we show that if M is a type I von Neumann algebra with an atomic lattice of projections, then every local Lie derivation on LS(M) is a Lie derivation.



    Let A be an associative algebra over the complex field C and M be an A-bimodule. A linear mapping δ from A into M is called a derivation if δ(AB)=δ(A)B+Aδ(B) for each A,B in A. In particular, a derivation δM defined by δM(A)=MAAM for every A in A is called an inner derivation, where M is a fixed element in M.

    In [31], S. Sakai proved that every derivation on von Neumann algebras is an inner derivation. In [12], E. Christensen showed that every derivation on nest algebras is an inner derivation. For more information on derivations and inner derivations, we refer to [13,14,19].

    In [22,24], R. Kadison, D. Larson and A. Sourour introduced the concept of local derivations. A linear mapping δ from A into M is called a local derivation if for every A in A, there exists a derivation δA (depending on A) from A into M such that δ(A)=δA(A).

    In [22], R. Kadison proved that every continuous local derivation from a von Neumann algebra into its dual Banach module is a derivation. In [24], D. Larson and A. Sourour proved that if X is a Banach space, then every local derivation on B(X) is a derivation. In [21], B. Jonson showed that every local derivation from a C-algebra into its Banach bimodule is a derivation. In [15,16], D. Hadwin and J. Li characterized local derivations on non self-adjoint operator algebras such as nest algebras and CDCSL algebras.

    A linear mapping φ from A into an A-bimodule M is called a Lie derivation if φ([A,B])=[φ(A),B]+[A,φ(B)] for each A,B in A, where [A,B]=ABBA is the usual Lie product. A Lie derivation φ is said to be standard if it can be decomposed as φ=δ+τ, where δ is a derivation from A into M and τ is a linear mapping from A into Z(A,M) such that τ([A,B])=0 for each A and B in A, where Z(A,M)={MM:AM=MAfor everyAinA}.

    In [20], B. Johnson proved that every continuous Lie derivation from a C-algebra into its Banach bimodule is standard. In [28], M. Mathieu and A. Villena proved that every Lie derivation on a C-algebra is standard. In [10], W. Cheung characterized Lie derivations on triangular algebras. In [27], F. Lu proved that every Lie derivation on a completely distributed commutative subspace lattice algebra is standard. In [4], D. Benkoviˇc proved that every Lie derivation on a matrix algebra Mn(A) is standard, where n2 and A is a unital algebra.

    Similar to local derivations, In [9], L. Chen, F. Lu and T. Wang introduced the concept of local Lie derivations. A linear mapping φ from A into M is called a local Lie derivation if for every A in A, there exists a Lie derivation φA (depending on A) from A into M such that φ(A)=φA(A).

    In [9], L. Chen, F. Lu and T. Wang proved that every local Lie derivation on B(X) is a Lie derivation, where X is a Banach space of dimension exceeding 2. In [8], L. Chen and F. Lu proved that every local Lie derivation on nest algebras is a Lie derivation. In [25,26], D. Liu and J. Zhang proved that under certain conditions, every local Lie derivation on triangular algebras is a Lie derivation, and every local Lie derivation on factor von Neumann algebras with dimension exceeding 1 is a Lie derivation. In [18], J. He, J. Li, G. An and W. Huang proved that every local Lie derivation on some algebras such as finite von Neumann algebras, nest algebras, Jiang-Su algebra and UHF algebras is a Lie derivation.

    Compare with the characterizations of derivations on Banach algebras, investigation of derivations on unbounded operator algebras begin much later.

    In [32], I. Segal studied the theory of noncommutative integration, and introduces various classes of non-trivial -algebras of unbounded operators. In this paper, we mainly consider the -algebra S(M) of all measurable operators and the -algebra LS(M) of all locally measurable operators affiliated with a von Neumann algebra M. In [32], I. Segal showed that the algebraic and topological properties of the measurable operators algebra S(M) are similar to the von Neumann algebra M. If M is a commutative von Neumann algebra, then M is -isomorphic to the algebra L(Ω,Σ,μ) of all essentially bounded measurable complex functions on a measure space (Ω,Σ,μ); and S(M) is -isomorphic to the algebra L0(Ω,Σ,μ) of all measurable almost everywhere finite complex-valued functions on (Ω,Σ,μ). In [5], A. Ber, V. Chilin and F. Sukochev showed that there exists a derivation on L0(0,1) is not an inner derivation, and the derivation is discontinuous in the measure topology. This result means that the properties of derivations on S(M) are different from the derivations on M.

    In [1,2], S. Albeverio, S. Ayupov and K. Kudaybergenov studied the properties of derivations on various classes of measurable algebras. If M is a type I von Neumann algebra, in [1], the authors proved that every derivation on LS(M) is an inner derivation if and only if it is Z(M) linear; in [2], the authors gave the decomposition form of derivations on S(M) and LS(M); they also prove that if M is a type I von Neumann algebra, then every derivation on S(M) or LS(M) is an inner derivation. If M is a properly infinite von Neumann algebra, in [6], A. Ber, V. Chilin and F. Sukochev proved that every derivation on LS(M) is continuous with respect to the local measure topology t(M); and in [7], A. Ber, V. Chilin and F. Sukochev showed that every derivation on LS(M) is an inner derivation. In [3], S. Albeverio and S. Ayupov gave a characterization of local derivations on S(M), where M is an abelian von Neumann algebra. In [17], D. Hadwin and J. Li proved that if M is a von Neumann algebra without abelian direct summands, then every local derivation on LS(M) or S(M) is a derivation. In [11], V. Chilin and I. Juraev showed that every Lie derivation on LS(M) or S(M) is standard.

    This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall the definitions of algebras of measurable operators and local measurable operators.

    In Section 3, we generalize the in [18,Corollary 3.2] and prove that every local Lie derivation on von Neumann algebras is a Lie derivation.

    In Section 4, we prove that if M is a type I von Neumann algebra with an atomic lattice of projections, then every local Lie derivation on LS(M) is a Lie derivation.

    Let H be a complex Hilbert space and B(H) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H. Suppose that M is a von Neumann algebra on H and Z(M)=MM is the center of M, where

    M={aB(H):ab=baforeverybinM}.

    Denote by P(M)={pM:p=p=p2} the lattice of all projections in M and by Pfin(M) the set of all finite projections in M. For each p and q in P(M), if we define the inclusion relation pq by pq, then P(M) is a complete lattice. Suppose that {pl}lλ is a family of projections in M, we denote

    suplλpl=¯lλplHandinflλpl=lλplH.

    If {pl}lλ is an orthogonal family of projections in M, then we have that

    suplλpl=lλpl.

    Let x be a closed densely defined linear operator on H with the domain D(x), where D(x) is a linear subspace of H. x is said to be affiliated with M, denote by xηM, if uxu=x for every unitary element u in M.

    A linear operator affiliated with M is said to be measurable with respect to M, if there exists a sequence {pn}n=1P(M) such that pn1, pn(H)D(x) and pn=1pnPfin(M) for every nN, where N is the set of all natural numbers. Denote by S(M) the set of all measurable operators affiliated with the von Neumann algebra M.

    A linear operator affiliated with M is said to be locally measurable with respect to M, if there exists a sequence {zn}n=1P(Z(M)) such that zn1 and znxS(M) for every nN. Denote by LS(M) the set of all locally measurable operators affiliated with the von Neumann algebra M.

    In [29], M. Muratov and V. Chilin proved that S(M) and LS(M) are both unital -algebras and MS(M)LS(M); they also showed that if M is a finite von Neumann algebra or dim(Z(M))<, then S(M)=LS(M); if M is a type III von Neumann algebra and dim(Z(M))=, then S(M)=M and LS(M)M.

    In this section, we consider local Lie derivations on von Neumann algebras. To prove our main theorem, we need the following lemma.

    Lemma 3.1. Let A1 and A2 be two unital algebras and A=A1A2. If the following five conditions hold:

    (1) each Lie derivation on A is standard;

    (2) each derivation on A is inner;

    (3) each local derivation on A is a derivation;

    (4)Z(A1)[A1,A1]={0};

    (5)A2=[A2,A2],

    then every local Lie derivation on A is a Lie derivation.

    Proof. Denote the units of A, A1 and A2 by I, P and Q, respectively. For each A in A, we have that A=PA+QA=A1+A2, where AiAi,i=1,2.

    In the following we suppose that φ is a local Lie derivation on A.

    By the definition of local Lie derivation, we know that for every A1 in A1, there exists a Lie derivation φA1 on A such that φ(A1)=φA1(A1). Since φA1 is standard and each derivation on A is inner, we can obtain that

    φ(A1)=φA1(A1)=δA1(A1)+τA1(A1)=[A1,TA1]+PτA1(A1)+QτA1(A1),

    where δA1 is a derivation on A, TA1 is an element in A, and τA1 is a linear mapping from A into Z(A) such that τA1([A,A])=0.

    It means that φ has a decomposition at A1. Next we show that the decomposition at A1 is unique. Assume there is another decomposition at A1, that is

    φ(A1)=φA1(A1)=δA1(A1)+τA1(A1)=[A1,TA1]+PτA1(A1)+QτA1(A1),

    where δA1 is a derivation on A, TA1 is an element in A and τA1 is a linear mapping from A into Z(A) such that τA1([A,A])=0.

    Then we have that

    [A1,TA1]+PτA1(A1)+QτA1(A1)=[A1,TA1]+PτA1(A1)+QτA1(A1).

    Thus

    [A1,TA1][A1,TA1]=PτA1(A1)PτA1(A1)+QτA1(A1)QτA1(A1).

    Since [A1,TA1][A1,TA1] and PτA1(A1)PτA1(A1) belong to A1, and QτA1(A1)QτA1(A1) belongs to A2, we have that QτA1(A1)QτA1(A1)=0. Moreover, we can obtain that

    [A1,TA1][A1,TA1]=[A1,PTA1][A1,PTA1][A1,A1],

    and

    PτA1(A1)PτA1(A1)Z(A1).

    From the condition (4), it follows that [A1,TA1][A1,TA1]=PτA1(A1)PτA1(A1)=0. It implies that δA1(A1)=δA1(A1) and τA1(A1)=τA1(A1). Hence the decomposition is unique.

    Now we have φ|A1=δ1+τ1, where δ1 is a mapping from A1 into A1 such that δ1(A1)=[A1,SA1] for some element SA1 in A1, and τ1 is a mapping from A1 into Z(A) such that τ1([A1,A1])=0.

    Next we prove that δ1 and τ1 are linear mappings. For each A1 and B1 in A1, we have that

    φ(A1)=δ1(A1)+τ1(A1)=[A1,SA1]+τ1(A1),
    φ(B1)=δ1(B1)+τ1(B1)=[B1,SB1]+τ1(B1),

    and

    φ(A1+B1)=δ1(A1+B1)+τ1(A1+B1)=[A1+B1,SA1+B1]+τ1(A1+B1).

    Since φ is additive, through a discussion similar to that before, it implies that

    [A1+B1,SA1+B1]=[A1,SA1]+[B1,SB1]

    and

    τ1(A1+B1)=τ1(A1)+τ1(B1).

    It means that δ1 and τ1 are additive mappings. Using the same technique, we can prove that δ1 and τ1 are homogeneous. Hence δ1 and τ1 are linear mappings.

    For every A2 in A2, we have that

    φ(A2)=φA2(A2)=δA2(A2)+τA2(A2)=[A2,TA2]+τA2(A2),

    where δA2 is a derivation on A, TA2 is an element in A and τA2 is a linear mapping from A into Z(A) such that τA2([A,A])=0. By condition (5), we have that τA2(A2)=0. Thus φ(A2)=[A2,TA2]=[A2,QTA2].

    Let φ|A2=δ2. Then we have δ2(A2)=[A2,SA2] for some element SA2 in A2. And obviously, δ2 is linear.

    Define two linear mappings as follows:

    δ(A)=δ1(A1)+δ2(A2),τ(A)=τ1(A1),

    for all A=A1+A2A. By the previous discussion, τ is a linear mapping from A into Z(A) such that τ([A,A])=0. In addition,

    δ(A)=δ1(A1)+δ2(A2)=[A1,SA1]+[A2,SA2]=[A1+A2,SA1+SA2]=[A,SA1+SA2].

    It means that δ is a local derivation. By condition (3), δ is a derivation. Notice that

    φ(A)=φ(A1)+φ(A2)=δ1(A1)+τ1(A1)+δ2(A2)=δ(A)+τ(A).

    Hence φ is a standard Lie derivation.

    By Lemma 3.1, we have the following result.

    Theorem 3.2. Every local Lie derivation on a von Neumann algebra is a Lie derivation.

    Proof. Let A be a von Neumann algebra. It is well known that A=A1A2, where A1 is a finite von Neumann algebra, and A2 is a proper infinite von Neumann algebra.

    By [28,Theorem 1.1], we know that every Lie derivation on A is standard, by [31,Theorem 1], we have that every derivation on A is inner, and by [21,Theorem 5.3], it follows that every local derivation on A is a derivation. Since A2 is a proper infinite von Neumann algebra, we known that A2=[A2,A2] (see in [33]).

    Hence it is sufficient to prove that Z(A1)[A1,A1]={0}. Since A1 is finite and by[23,Theorem 8.2.8], it follows that there is a center-valued trace τ on A1 such that τ(Z)=Z for every Z in Z(A1) and τ([A,B])=0 for each A and B in A1. Suppose that AZ(A1)[A1,A1], then we have that τ(A)=A and τ(A)=0, it implies that A=0.

    By Lemma 3.1, we know that every local Lie derivation on a von Neumann algebra is a Lie derivation.

    In this section, we mainly consider local Lie derivations on algebras of all locally measurable operators affiliated with a type I von Neumann algebra. To prove the main result, we need the following lemmas.

    Lemma 4.1. Suppose that A is a commutative unital algebra and J=Mn(A). Then Z(J)[J,J]={0}.

    Proof. Let {ei,j}ni,j=1 be the system of matrix units in Mn(A). Then for every element A in J, we have that A=ni,j=1aijeij, where aijA.

    Define a linear mapping τ from J into A by τ(A)=ni=1aii for every A=ni,j=1aijeijJ. Since A is commutative, it is not difficult to verify that τ([A,B])=0 for each A and B in J.

    It should be noticed that Z(J)={A:A=ni=1aeii,aA}. Suppose that A=ni=1aeii is an element in Z(J)[J,J], then by the definition of τ, we have that τ(A)=na and τ(A)=0. It implies that A=0.

    Lemma 4.2. Suppose that A=iΛAi. If Z(Ai)[Ai,Ai]={0} for every iΛ, then we have that Z(A)[A,A]={0}.

    Proof. Let A={ai}iΛ be an element in Z(A)[A,A]. Then for every iΛ, we have that aiZ(Ai)[Ai,Ai]. From the assumption, it follows that ai=0. Hence A=0.

    Lemma 4.3. Suppose that M is a type I von Neumann algebra. Then LS(M)=[LS(M),LS(M)].

    Proof. By [30], we know that for every x in LS(M), there exists a sequence {zn} of mutually orthogonal central projections in M with n=1zn=I, such that x=n=1znx, and znxM for every nN. Since M is a proper infinite von Neumann algebra, it is well known that M=[M,M]. Thus we have that znx=ki=1[ani,bni], where ani,bniM for each n and i.

    Set si=n=1znani and ti=n=1znbni. By the definition of locally measurable operators, it is easy to show that si and ti are two elements in LS(M).

    Since that {zn} are mutually orthogonal central projections, we can obtain that

    [si,ti]=[n=1znani,n=1znbni]=n=1zn[ani,bni],

    moreover, we have that

    ki=1[si,ti]=ki=1n=1zn[ani,bni]=n=1zn(ki=1[ani,bni])=n=1znx=x.

    It follows that x[LS(M),LS(M)].

    In the following we show the main result of this section.

    Theorem 4.4. Suppose that M is a type I von Neumann algebra with an atomic lattice of projections. Then every local Lie derivation from LS(M) into itself is a Lie derivation.

    Proof. By [23,Theorem 6.5.2], we know that M=M1M2, where M1 is a type Ifinite von Neumann algebra and M2 is a type I von Neumann algebra. Hence by [2,Proposition 1.1], we have that LS(M)LS(M1)LS(M2).

    In the following we will verify the conditions (1) to (5) in Lemma 3.1 one by one.

    By [11,Theorem 1], we know that every Lie derivation on LS(M) is standard; by [2,Corollary 5,12], we know that every derivation on LS(M) is inner for a von Neumann algebra with atomic lattice of projections.

    It is proved in [16] that every local derivation on LS(M) is a derivation for a von Neumann algebra without abelian direct summands. While for an abelian von Neumann algebra with atomic lattice of projections, by [3,Theorem 3.8] we know that every local derivation on LS(M) is a derivation. Associated the two results, we can obtain each local derivation on LS(M) is a derivation for a von Neumann algebra with atomic lattice of projections.

    Since M1 is a type Ifinite von Neumann algebra, we know that M1=n=1An, where each An is a homogenous type In von Neumann algebra. Hence LS(M1)n=1LS(An). Since An is a homogenous type In von Neumann algebra, by [2] we know that LS(An)Mn(Z(LS(An))). By Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, we know that the condition (4) in Lemma 3.1 holds. And by Lemma 4.3, the condition (5) in Lemma 3.1 holds.

    In this paper, we prove that every local Lie derivation on von Neumann algebras is a Lie derivation; and we show that if M is a type I von Neumann algebra with an atomic lattice of projections, then every local Lie derivation on LS(M) is a Lie derivation.

    The authors thank the referee for his or her suggestions. This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11801342, 11801005, 11801050) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0723). We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments which have enabled to improve the original version of this paper.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this paper.



    [1] S. Albeverio, Sh. Ayupov, K. Kudaybergenov, Derivations on the algebra of measurable operators affiliated with a type I von Neumann algebra, Sib. Adv. Math., 18 (2008), 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/s1055134408020028
    [2] S. Albeverio, Sh. Ayupov, K. Kudaybergenov, Structure of derivations on various algebras of measurable operators for type I von Neumann algebras, J. Funct. Anal., 256 (2009), 2917–2943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2008.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2008.11.003
    [3] S. Albeverio, Sh. Ayupov, K. Kudaybergenov, B. Nurjanov, Local derivations on algebras of measurable operators, Commun. Contemp. Math., 13 (2011), 643–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219199711004270 doi: 10.1142/S0219199711004270
    [4] D. Benkoviˇc, Lie triple derivations of unital algebras with idempotents, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 63 (2015), 141–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2013.851200 doi: 10.1080/03081087.2013.851200
    [5] A. Ber, V. Chilin, F. Sukochev, Non-trivial derivation on commutative regular algebras, Extracta Mathematicae, 21 (2006), 107–147.
    [6] A. Ber, V. Chilin, F. Sukochev, Continuity of derivations of algebras of locally measurable operators, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 75 (2013), 527–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00020-013-2039-3 doi: 10.1007/s00020-013-2039-3
    [7] A. Ber, V. Chilin, F. Sukochev, Continuous derivations on algebras of locally measurable operators are inner, Proc. London Math. Soc., 109 (2014), 65–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms/pdt070 doi: 10.1112/plms/pdt070
    [8] L. Chen, F. Lu, Local Lie derivations of nest algebras, Linear Algebra Appl., 475 (2015), 62–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.01.039 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2015.01.039
    [9] L. Chen, F. Lu, T. Wang, Local and 2-local Lie derivations of operator algebras on Banach spaces, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 77 (2013), 109–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00020-013-2074-0 doi: 10.1007/s00020-013-2074-0
    [10] W. S. Cheung, Lie derivations of triangular algebra, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 51 (2003), 299–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0308108031000096993 doi: 10.1080/0308108031000096993
    [11] V. Chilin, I. Juraev, Lie derivations on the algebras of locally measurable operators, arXiv: 1608. 03996v1.
    [12] E. Christensen, Derivations of nest algebras, Math. Ann., 229 (1977), 155–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01351601 doi: 10.1007/BF01351601
    [13] H. Du, J. Zhang, Derivations on nest-subalgebras of von Neumann algebras, Chinese Ann. Math. A, 17 (1996), 467–474.
    [14] H. Du, J. Zhang, Derivations on nest-subalgebras of von Neumann algebras II, Acta Mathematica Sinica, 40 (1997), 357–362.
    [15] D. Hadwin, J. Li, Local derivations and local automorphisms, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 290 (2004), 702–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.10.015
    [16] D. Hadwin, J. Li, Local derivations and local automorphisms on some algebras, J. Operator Theory, 60 (2008), 29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/24715835 doi: 10.2307/24715835
    [17] D. Hadwin, J. Li, Q. Li, X. Ma, Local derivations on rings containing a von Neumann algebra and a question of Kadison, arXiv: 1311.0030v1.
    [18] J. He, J. Li, G. An, W. Huang, Characterizations of 2-local derivations and local Lie derivations on some algebras, Sib. Math. J., 59 (2018), 721–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0037446618040146 doi: 10.1134/S0037446618040146
    [19] J. He, J. Li, D. Zhao, Derivations, local and 2-local derivations on some algebras of operators on Hilbert C*-bodules, Mediterr. J. Math., 14 (2017), 230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00009-017-1032-5 doi: 10.1007/s00009-017-1032-5
    [20] B. Johnson, Symmetric amenability and the nonexistence of Lie and Jordan derivations, Math. Proc. Cambridge, 120 (1996), 455–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100075010 doi: 10.1017/S0305004100075010
    [21] B. Johnson, Local derivations on C-algebras are derivations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 353 (2001), 313–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02688-X doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02688-X
    [22] R. Kadison, Local derivations, J. Algebra, 130 (1990), 494–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(90)90095-6 doi: 10.1016/0021-8693(90)90095-6
    [23] R. Kadison, J. Ringrose, Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, New York: Academic Press, 1983.
    [24] D. Larson, A. Sourour, Local derivations and local automorphisms of B(X), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 1990,187–194.
    [25] D. Liu, J. Zhang, Local Lie derivations on certain operator algebras, Ann. Funct. Anal., 8 (2017), 270–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/20088752-0000012x doi: 10.1215/20088752-0000012x
    [26] D. Liu, J. Zhang, Local Lie derivations of factor von Neumann algebras, Linear Algebra Appl., 519 (2017), 208–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2017.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.01.004
    [27] F. Lu, Lie derivation of certain CSL algebras, Isr. J. Math., 155 (2006), 149–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02773953 doi: 10.1007/BF02773953
    [28] M. Mathieu, A. Villena, The structure of Lie derivations on C-algebras, J. Funct. Anal., 202 (2003), 504–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1236(03)00077-6 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1236(03)00077-6
    [29] M. Muratov, V. Chilin, Algebras of measurable and locally measurable operators, Kiev: Institute of Mathematics Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, 2007.
    [30] M. Muratov, V. Chilin, Central extensions of *-algebras of measurable operators, Reports of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 7 (2009), 24–28.
    [31] S. Sakai, Derivations of W-algebras, Ann. Math., 83 (1966), 273–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1970432 doi: 10.2307/1970432
    [32] I. Segal, A non-commutative extension of abstract integration, Ann. Math., 57 (1953), 401–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1969729 doi: 10.2307/1969729
    [33] H. Sunouchi, Infinite Lie rings, Tohoku Math. J., 8 (1956), 291–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178244954 doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178244954
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Dan Liu, Jianhua Zhang, Mingliang Song, Local Lie derivations of generalized matrix algebras, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 6900, 10.3934/math.2023349
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1815) PDF downloads(125) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog