There is great interest to understand and reduce the massive carbon footprint of the concrete industry. Recent descriptions of microbes incidentally living inside concrete materials ("concrete endoliths") raised questions about how much carbon is either stored in or released from concrete by these microbes. We generated preliminary global estimates of how much organic carbon is stored within the living biomass of concrete endoliths (biomass-carbon) and much CO2 is released from respiring concrete endoliths. Between 2020–2022, we collected widely varying samples of Portland cement-based concrete from Lubbock, Texas. After quantifying endolith DNA from 25 concrete samples and estimating the current global mass of concrete, we calculated that the global concrete endolith biomass-carbon as low as 5191.9 metric tons (suggesting that endoliths are a negligible part of concrete's carbon profile) or as high as 1141542.3 tons (suggesting that concrete endoliths are a pool of carbon that could equal or offset some smaller sources of concrete-related carbon emissions). Additionally, we incubated concrete samples in air-tight microcosms and measured changes in the CO2 concentrations within those microcosms. Two out of the ten analyzed samples emitted small amounts of CO2 due to the endoliths. Thus, "concrete respiration" is possible, at least from concrete materials with abundant endolithic microbes. However, the remaining samples showed no reliable respiration signals, indicating that concrete structures often do not harbor enough metabolically active endoliths to cause CO2 emissions. These results are preliminary but show that endoliths may alter the carbon dynamics of solid concrete and, thus, the carbon footprint of the concrete industry.
Citation: Jordan Brown, Corona Chen, Deborah Carr. Endolithic microbes may alter the carbon profile of concrete[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(2): 221-247. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024011
There is great interest to understand and reduce the massive carbon footprint of the concrete industry. Recent descriptions of microbes incidentally living inside concrete materials ("concrete endoliths") raised questions about how much carbon is either stored in or released from concrete by these microbes. We generated preliminary global estimates of how much organic carbon is stored within the living biomass of concrete endoliths (biomass-carbon) and much CO2 is released from respiring concrete endoliths. Between 2020–2022, we collected widely varying samples of Portland cement-based concrete from Lubbock, Texas. After quantifying endolith DNA from 25 concrete samples and estimating the current global mass of concrete, we calculated that the global concrete endolith biomass-carbon as low as 5191.9 metric tons (suggesting that endoliths are a negligible part of concrete's carbon profile) or as high as 1141542.3 tons (suggesting that concrete endoliths are a pool of carbon that could equal or offset some smaller sources of concrete-related carbon emissions). Additionally, we incubated concrete samples in air-tight microcosms and measured changes in the CO2 concentrations within those microcosms. Two out of the ten analyzed samples emitted small amounts of CO2 due to the endoliths. Thus, "concrete respiration" is possible, at least from concrete materials with abundant endolithic microbes. However, the remaining samples showed no reliable respiration signals, indicating that concrete structures often do not harbor enough metabolically active endoliths to cause CO2 emissions. These results are preliminary but show that endoliths may alter the carbon dynamics of solid concrete and, thus, the carbon footprint of the concrete industry.
| [1] |
Head MJ, Steffen W, Fagerlind D, et al. (2021) The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch. Episodes 45: 359–376. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021031 doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021031
|
| [2] |
Phillips S (2014) Review of Concrete and culture: a material history. J Soc Archit Hist 73: 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2014.73.3.417 doi: 10.1525/jsah.2014.73.3.417
|
| [3] |
Elhacham E, Ben-Uri L, Grozovski J, et al. (2020) Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature 588: 442–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5
|
| [4] |
Monteiro PJM, Miller SA, Horvath A (2017) Towards sustainable concrete. Nat Mater 16: 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4930 doi: 10.1038/nmat4930
|
| [5] | Meyer C (2005) Concrete as a green building material. Proceedings of ConMat '05 10. |
| [6] |
Van Damme H (2018) Concrete material science: Past, present, and future innovations. Cem Concr Res 112: 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.002
|
| [7] |
Miatto A, Schandl H, Fishman T, et al. (2016) Global patterns and trends for non-metallic minerals used for construction. J Ind Ecol 21: 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12471 doi: 10.1111/jiec.12471
|
| [8] |
Liew KM, Sojobi AO, Zhang LW (2017) Green concrete: Prospects and challenges. Constr Build Mater 156: 1063–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.008
|
| [9] | Pilon BS, Tyner JS, Yoder DC, et al. (2019) The effect of pervious concrete on water quality parameters: A case study. MDPI Water 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11020263 |
| [10] | Halauniova A (2022) Good and bad concrete. Fugitive modern and the aesthetics of renovation in Poland. City https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2021.2019490 |
| [11] | The Cement Sustainability Initiative (2016) Cement Industry Energy and CO2 Performance. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://www.wbcsd.org/Sector-Projects/Cement-Sustainability-Initiative/Resources/Cement-Industry-Energy-and-CO2-Performance |
| [12] | Internation Energy Agency (2018) Technology roadmap: low-carbon transition in the cement industry. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry |
| [13] |
Barcelo L, Kline J, Walenta G, et al. (2014) Cement and carbon emissions. Mater Struct 47: 1055–1065. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0114-5 doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0114-5
|
| [14] | Hammond G, Jones C (2011) Embodied Carbon. The inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). A Building Services Research Information Association guide. |
| [15] |
Naqi A, Jang JG (2019) Recent progress in green cement technology utilizing low-carbon emission fuels and raw materials: a review. MDPI Sustainability 11: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020537 doi: 10.3390/su11020537
|
| [16] | Marinkovic SB (2013) Life cycle assessment of (LCA) aspects of concrete, In: Eco-efficient concrete. Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S, Labrincha J, et al. Eds., United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing, 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098993.1.45 |
| [17] | Xi F, Davis SJ, Ciais P, et al. (2016) Substaintial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation. Nat. Geosci. 9: 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2840 |
| [18] |
Possan E, Thomaz WA, Aleandri GA, et al. (2017) CO2 uptake potential due to concrete carbonation: A case study. Case Stud Constr Mater 6: 147–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2017.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.01.007
|
| [19] | Gajda J (2001) Absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide by portland cement concrete. Portland Cement Association |
| [20] |
Pade C, Guimaraes M (2007) The CO2 uptake of concrete in a 100 year perspective. Cem Concr Res 37: 1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.009
|
| [21] |
Maresca JA, Moser P, Schumacher T (2017) Analysis of bacterial communities in and on concrete. Mater Struct 50: 25. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0929-y doi: 10.1617/s11527-016-0929-y
|
| [22] |
Golubic S, Friedmann E, Schneider J (1981) The lithobiontic ecological niche, with special reference to microorganisms. J Sediment Res 51: 475–478. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7CB6-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D doi: 10.1306/212F7CB6-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D
|
| [23] |
Colwell FS, D'Hondt S (2013) Nature and extent of the deep biosphere. Rev Mineral Geochem 75: 547–574. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2013.75.17 doi: 10.2138/rmg.2013.75.17
|
| [24] |
Santelli CM, Banergee N, Bach W, et al. (2010) Tapping the subsurface ocean crust biosphere: Low biomass and drilling-related contamination calls for improved quality controls. Geomicrobiol J 27: 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450903456780 doi: 10.1080/01490450903456780
|
| [25] |
Kallmeyer J, Pockalny R, Adhikari RR, et al. (2012) Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. PNAS 109: 16213–16216. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203849109 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203849109
|
| [26] |
Fordyce AJ, Ainsworth TD, Leggat W (2021) Light capture, skeletal morphology, and the biomass of corals' boring endoliths. mSphere 6: e00060–21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00060-21 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00060-21
|
| [27] | Matthes-Sears U, Gerrath JA, Larson DW (1997) Abundance, biomass, and productivity of endolithic and epilithic lower plants on the temperatre-zone cliffs of the Niagara Escarpment, Canada. Int J Plant Sci 158: 451–460. |
| [28] | Sun HJ, Friedmann EI (1999) Growth on geological time scales in the Antarctic cryptoendolithic microbial community. Geomicrobiol J 16: 193–202. |
| [29] |
Tyler NA, Ziolkowski LA (2021) Endolithic microbial carbon cycling in East Antarctica. Astrobiology 21: 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2019.2109 doi: 10.1089/ast.2019.2109
|
| [30] |
Fang J, Zhang L (2011) Exploring the deep biosphere. Sci China Earth Sci 54: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-4148-z doi: 10.1007/s11430-010-4148-z
|
| [31] |
Brown J, Chen C, Fernandez M, et al. (2023) Urban endoliths: incidental microbial communities occurring inside concrete. AIMS Microbiol 9: 277–312. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2023016 doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023016
|
| [32] |
Kiledal EA, Keffer JL, Maresca JA (2021) Bacterial communities in concrete reflect its composite nature and change with weathering. mSystems 6: e01153–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01153-20 doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01153-20
|
| [33] |
Coombes MA, Naylor LA, Thompson RC, et al. (2011) Colonization and weathering of engineering materials by marine microorganisms: an SEM study. Earth Surf Proc Land 36: 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2076 doi: 10.1002/esp.2076
|
| [34] | Kiledal EA, Shaw M, Polson SW, et al. (2023) Metagenomic analyis of concrete bridge reveals a microbial communitiy dominated by halophilic Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiol Spectr 11. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.05112-22 |
| [35] |
Kaur P, Singh V, Arora A (2022) Microbial concrete—a sustainable solution for concrete construction. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 194: 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03604-x doi: 10.1007/s12010-021-03604-x
|
| [36] |
Al-Mansour A, Chow CL, Feo L, et al. (2019) Green concrete: By-products utilization and advanced approaches. MDPI Sustainability 11: 5145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195145 doi: 10.3390/su11195145
|
| [37] | United States Climate Data (2022) Lubbock, Texas climate data. Available from: https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/lubbock/texas/united-states/ustx2745 |
| [38] | Kiledal EA, Maresca JA (2021) DNA extraction from concrete V.2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.b2i5qcg6 |
| [39] |
Semenov M, Blagodatskaya E, Stepanov A, et al. (2018) DNA-based determination of soil microbial biomass in alkaline and carbonaceous soils of semi-arid climate. J Arid Environ 150: 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.11.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.11.013
|
| [40] |
Anderson TH, Martens R (2013) DNA determinations during growth of soil microbial biomasses. Soil Biol Biochem 57: 487–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.031 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.031
|
| [41] |
Fornasier F, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, et al. (2014) A simplified rapid, low-cost and versatile DNA-based assessment of soil microbial biomass. Ecol Indic 45: 75–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.028 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.028
|
| [42] | Gong H, Du Q, Xie S, et al. (2021). Soil microbial DNA concentration is a powerful indicator for estimating soil microbial biomass C and N across arid and semi-arid regions in northern China. Appl Soil Ecol 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103869 |
| [43] | United States Geological Survey (2023) Cement Production Worldwide from 1995 to 2022 (in Billion Metric Tons). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1087115/global-cement-production-volume. |
| [44] |
Waters CN, Zalasiewicz J (2018) Concrete: the most abundant novel rock type of the Anthropocene. Encyclopedia Anthrop 1: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09775-5 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09775-5
|
| [45] |
Moriarty R, O'Brien TD (2013) Distribution of mesozooplankton biomass in the global ocean. Earth Syst Sci Data 5: 45–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-45-2013 doi: 10.5194/essd-5-45-2013
|
| [46] |
Cho SU, Chae CU (2016) A study on life cycle CO2 emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea. MDPI Sustainability 8: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060579 doi: 10.3390/su8060579
|
| [47] |
Llatas C, Quinones R, Bizcocho N (2022) Environmental impact assessment of construction waste recycling versus disposal scenarios using an LCA-BIM tool during the design stage. MDPI Recycling 7: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7060082 doi: 10.3390/recycling7060082
|
| [48] |
Wierzchos J, de los Ríos A, Ascaso C (2012) Microorganisms in desert rocks: the edge of life on Earth. Int Microbiol 15: 171–181. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.1501.01.170 doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.170
|
| [49] |
Bone JR, Stafford R, Hall AE, et al. (2022) The intrinsic primary bioreceptivity of concrete in the coastal environment – A review. Dev Built Environ 10: 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100078 doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100078
|
| [50] |
Marshall D, Meuller C, Clifford B (2020) Computational arrangement of demolition debris. Detritus 11: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13967 doi: 10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13967
|
| [51] |
Convey P, Key RS, Key RJD (2010) The establishment of a new ecological guild of pollinating insects of sub-Antarctic South Georgia. Antarct Sci 22: 508–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095410201000057X doi: 10.1017/S095410201000057X
|
| [52] |
Lebouvier M, Lambret P, Garnier A, et al. (2020) Spotlight on the invasion of a carabid beetle on an oceanic island over a 105-year period. Sci Rep 10: 17103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72754-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72754-5
|
| [53] |
Gjørv OE (2011) Durability of Concrete Structures. Arab J Sci Eng 36: 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0033-5 doi: 10.1007/s13369-010-0033-5
|
| [54] |
Giannantonio DJ, Kurth JC, Kurtis KE, et al. (2009) Molecular characterizations of microbial communities fouling painted and unpainted concrete structures. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 63: 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.06.004
|
| [55] |
Hayek M, Slagues M, Souch J, et al. (2023) How to improve the bioreceptivity of concrete infrastructure used in marine ecosystems? Literature review for mechanisms, key factors, and colonization effects. J Coast Res 39: 553–568. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-21-00158.1 doi: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-21-00158.1
|
| [56] |
Wiscovitch-Russo R, Singh H, Oldfield LM, et al. (2022) An optimized approach for processing of frozen lung and lavage samples for microbiome studies. PLoS One 17: e0265891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265891 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265891
|
| [57] |
Joergensen RG, Emmerling C (2006) Methods for evaluating human impact on soil microorganisms based on their activity, biomass, and diversity in agricultural soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169: 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521941 doi: 10.1002/jpln.200521941
|
| [58] |
Rotbart N, Borisover M, Bukhanovsky N, et al. (2017) Examination of residual chloroform interference in the measurement of microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction. Soil Biol Biochem 111: 60–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.018
|
| [59] | Zelles L, Palojarvi A, Kandeler E, et al. (1997) Changes in soil microbial properties and phospholipid fatty acid fractions after chloroform fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 29: 1325–1336. |
| [60] | Ross DJ (1987) Soil microbial biomass estimated by the fumigation-incubation procedure: Seasonal fluctuations and influence of soil moisture content. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 397–404. |
| [61] | Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Lauk C, et al. (2017) Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. PNAS 114: 1880–1885. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1613773114 |
| [62] |
Muller DB, Liu G, Løvik AN, et al. (2013) Carbon emissions of infrastructure development. Environ Sci Technol 47: 11739–11746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es402618m doi: 10.1021/es402618m
|
| [63] |
Krausmann F, Lauk C, Haas W, et al. (2018) From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Glob Environ Change 52: 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003
|
| [64] |
Nedeljkovic M, Visser J, Savija B, et al. (2021) Use of fine recycled concrete aggregates in concrete: A critical review. J Build Eng 38: 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102196 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102196
|
| [65] |
McNeil K, Kang THK (2013) Recycled concrete aggregates: A review. Int J Concr Struct 7: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0032-5 doi: 10.1007/s40069-013-0032-5
|
| [66] |
Hashimoto S, Tanikawa H, Moriguchi Y (2007) Where will large amounts of materials accumulated within the economy go? – A material flow analysis of construction minerals for Japan. Waste Manage 27: 1725–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.10.009
|
| [67] | Carlson CA, Del Giorgio PA, Herndl GJ (2007) Microbes and the dissipation of energy and respiration: From cells to ecosystems. Oceanography 20: 89–100. |
| [68] |
Konopka MC, Strovas TJ, Ojala DS, et al. (2011) Respiration response imaging for real-time detection of microbial function at the single-cell level. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01166-10 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01166-10
|
| [69] |
Ziolkowski LA, Mykytczuk NCS, Omelon CR, et al. (2013) Arctic gypsum endoliths: a biogeochemical characterization of a viable and active microbial community. Biogeosciences 10: 7661–7675. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7661-2013 doi: 10.5194/bg-10-7661-2013
|
| [70] | Davila AF, Hawes I, Araya JG, et al. (2015) In situ metabolism in halite endolithic microbial communities of the hyperarid Atacama Desert. Front Microbiol 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01035 |
| [71] | Mergelov N, Mueller CW, Prater I, et al. (2018) Alteration of rocks by endolithic organisms is one of the pathways for the beginning of soils on Earth. Sci Rep 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21682-6 |
| [72] | Sajjad W, Ilahi N, Kang S, et al. (2022) Endolithic microbes of rocks, their community, function and survival strategies. Int Biodeterior. Biodegradation 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105387 |
| [73] | Rochette P, Hutchinson GL (2005) Measurement of soil respiration in situ: Chamber techniques. In: Hatfield JL, Baker JM. Authors, Micrometerology in Agricultural Systems, Agron. Monogr. 47., Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, 247–286. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr47.c12 |
| [74] |
Midwood AJ, Millard P (2011) Challenges in measuring the δ13C of the soil surface CO2 efflux. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25: 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4857 doi: 10.1002/rcm.4857
|
| [75] | MacFayden A (1973) Inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide on microbial activity in soil. Pedobiologia 13: 140–149. |
| [76] |
Shestak CJ, Busse MD (2005) Compaction alters physical but not biological indices of soil health. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69: 236–246. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0236 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0236
|
| [77] |
Frouz J, Luděk B (2018) Flow of CO2 from soil may not correspond with CO2 concentration in soil. Sci Rep 8: 10099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28225-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28225-z
|
| [78] | Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edition. Essex, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited. |
| [79] |
Dauti D, Tengattini A, Dal Pont S, et al. (2018) Analysis of moisture migration in concrete at high temperature through in-situ neutron tomography. Cem Concr Res 111: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.010
|
| [80] |
Goordial J, Davila A, Lacelle D, et al. (2016) Nearing the cold-arid limits of microbial life in permafrost of an upper dry valley, Antarctica. ISME J 10: 1613–1624 https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.239 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.239
|
| [81] |
Levin GV, Straat PA (2016) The case for extant life on Mars and its possible detection by the Viking Labeled Release Experiment. Astrobiology 16: 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1464 doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1464
|
| [82] | Xie J, Li Y, Zhai C, et al. (2009) CO2 absorption by alkaline soils and its implication to the global carbon cycle. Environ Geol 56: 953–961. |
| [83] | Tang B, Fan M, Yang Z, et al. (2023) A comparison study of aggregate carbonation and concrete carbonation for the enhancement of recycled aggregate pervious concrete. Constr Build Mater 371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130797 |
| [84] |
Šantrůčková H, Bird MI, Elhottová D, et al. (2005) Heterotrophic fixation of CO2 in soil. Microb Ecol 49: 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0164-x doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0164-x
|
| [85] |
Kuzyakov Y (2006) Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020
|
| [86] | Mehta PK (2010) Sustainable cements and concrete for the climate change era – A review. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy. |
| [87] |
Shi J, Xu Y (2006) Estimation and forecasting of concrete debris amount in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 49: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.011 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.011
|
| [88] | Bahmani H, Mostafaei H, Ghiassi B, et al. (2023) A comparitive study of calcium hydroxide, calcium oxide, calcined dolomite, and metasilicate as activators for slag-based HPC. Structures 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105653 |
| [89] | Mostafaei H, Bahmani H, Mostofinejad D, et al. (2023) A novel development of HPC without cement: Mechanical properties and sustainability evalution. J Build Eng 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107262 |
| [90] | Rowell A, Ghebrab T, Jeter R (2023) Bacterial treatment of recycled concrete aggregate. MDPI Recycling 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling8050068 |
Figures(4) / Tables(5)
Jordan Brown, Corona Chen, Deborah Carr. Endolithic microbes may alter the carbon profile of concrete[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(2): 221-247. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024011
DownLoad: