In this paper, we investigate the relation of generalized Meijer G-functions with some other special functions. We prove the generalized form of Laguerre polynomials, product of Laguerre polynomials with exponential functions, logarithmic functions in terms of generalized Meijer G-functions. The generalized confluent hypergeometric functions and generalized tricomi confluent hypergeometric functions are also expressed in terms of the generalized Meijer G-functions.
Citation: Syed Ali Haider Shah, Shahid Mubeen. Expressions of the Laguerre polynomial and some other special functions in terms of the generalized Meijer G-functions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11631-11641. doi: 10.3934/math.2021676
[1] | Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Anna Napoli . New formulas of convolved Pell polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 565-593. doi: 10.3934/math.2024030 |
[2] | Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Omar Mazen Alqubori . On generalized Hermite polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32463-32490. doi: 10.3934/math.20241556 |
[3] | Xiaowei Pan, Xiaoyan Guo . Some new identities involving Laguerre polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12713-12717. doi: 10.3934/math.2021733 |
[4] | Feng Qi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Gauhar Rahman . Convexity and inequalities related to extended beta and confluent hypergeometric functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1499-1507. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1499 |
[5] | A. Belafhal, N. Nossir, L. Dalil-Essakali, T. Usman . Integral transforms involving the product of Humbert and Bessel functions and its application. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1260-1274. doi: 10.3934/math.2020086 |
[6] | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Thabet Abdeljawad, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Integral transforms of an extended generalized multi-index Bessel function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7531-7547. doi: 10.3934/math.2020482 |
[7] | Ye-Cong Han, Chuan-Yu Cai, Ti-Ren Huang . Monotonicity, convexity properties and inequalities involving Gaussian hypergeometric functions with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4974-4991. doi: 10.3934/math.2022277 |
[8] | Liang Cai, Huan-Huan Zhang, Li-Yun Pan . A Probabilistic Characterization of g-Harmonic Functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(1): 70-80. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.1.70 |
[9] | Saima Naheed, Shahid Mubeen, Gauhar Rahman, M. R. Alharthi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Some new inequalities for the generalized Fox-Wright functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5452-5464. doi: 10.3934/math.2021322 |
[10] | Taekyun Kim, Dae San Kim, Dmitry V. Dolgy, Jongkyum Kwon . Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of two different types. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12528-12542. doi: 10.3934/math.2021722 |
In this paper, we investigate the relation of generalized Meijer G-functions with some other special functions. We prove the generalized form of Laguerre polynomials, product of Laguerre polynomials with exponential functions, logarithmic functions in terms of generalized Meijer G-functions. The generalized confluent hypergeometric functions and generalized tricomi confluent hypergeometric functions are also expressed in terms of the generalized Meijer G-functions.
Special functions is a basic and important field of mathematics, because of applications in functional analysis, physics, statistics, mathematical analysis etc. The special functions can not be defined in formal way but all the functions which are important enough and assigned by their own names like exponential functions, logarithmic functions, trigonometric functions, Laguerre polynomials, Lagrange polynomials, Hermite polynomials, Mcrobert E-functions, Meijer G-functions, Fox H-functions etc. are considered to be the special functions. The Pochhammer symbol, gamma function, beta function and hypergeometric functions are fundamentals in the field of special functions.
The Pochhammer's symbol is defined [1] as
(a)n={a(a+1)(a+2)⋯(a+n−1)for n≥11for n=0,a≠0, | (1.1) |
where a∈C and n∈N.
The gamma function is defined [1] as
Γ(a)=∫∞0ta−1e−tdt, | (1.2) |
where ℜ(a)>0.
The relation of gamma function with Pochhammer symbol is given as
(a)n=Γ(a+n)Γ(a). | (1.3) |
The beta function is defined [1] in the integral and gamma function forms as
β(a,b)=∫10ta−1(1−t)b−1dt,ℜ(a)>0,ℜ(b)>0=Γ(a)Γ(b)Γ(a+b). | (1.4) |
The Laguerre polynomial is defined [1] as
Lλv(t)=v∑i=0(−1)i(1+λ)vtii!(v−i)!(1+λ)i, | (1.5) |
where v is non-negative integer. The researchers [2,3,4] worked on the Laguerre polynomials and proved some important relations and applications in different fields.
The Gauss hypergeometric and confluent hypergeometric functions are defined [1] respectively as
2F1[v,wl|t]=∞∑n=0(v)n(w)ntn(l)nn! | (1.6) |
and
1F1[vl|t]=∞∑n=0(v)ntn(l)nn!, | (1.7) |
where v,w,l are parameters with l not be zero or negative integer and |t|<1.
Shen-Yang et al. [5] worked on the functional inequalities for the Gaussian hypergeometric function and generalized elliptic integral of the first kind. They discussed some applications of the Gauss hypergeometric functions in different areas especially in functional analysis. Almost all the special functions and elementary functions can be obtained from hypergeometric functions as special cases. Several applications of Gauss hypergeometric functions are discussed in [6,7,8]. Wang et al. [9] worked on the generalization of the inequalities and proved the generalization of Ramanujan's cubic transformation inequalities for zero balanced hypergeometric functions. Qiu et al. [10] investigated the generalization of the inequalities and proved sharp Lenden transformation inequalities for hypergeometric functions. They also proved some properties and gave some applications of the Ramanujan's constant.
The Meijer G-functions are important in various fields especially in applied mathematics and mathematical statistics. These functions naturally appear as a solution of differential equations. Meijer G-functions are interesting because of greater flexibility in the orders p,q,m,n and the parameters. By adopting different values of these parameters, we can obtain different known special functions. Because of the fact that Miejer G-functions can be defined in different ways, these functions are easy to compute. Almost all the elementary functions can be presented in the form of Meijer G-functions by choosing different parameters. Meijer G-functions are applicable in mathematical physics because these can be expressed in the form of hypergeometric function. So, almost all the special functions can be obtained as special cases of Meijer G-functions.
The Meijer G-function is defined [11,12,13,14,15] in integral form as
Gm,np,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=12πi∮LΓk(b1,m−s)Γk(k−a1,n+s)Γk(an+1,p−s)Γk(k−bm+1,q+s)ts/kds, | (1.8) |
where m,n,p,q are orders of G-function with the conditions 0≤m≤q and 0≤n≤p, and ap,bq are parameters. Also no poles of any Γ(bj−s),j=1,2,...,m coincides with a pole of Γ(1−ai+s),i=1,2,...,n.
The Meijer G-functions in term of hypergeometric functions are given as
Gm,np,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=m∑i=1∏mh=1Γ(bh−bi)∗∏nh=1Γ(1−ah+bi)tbi∏qh=m+1Γ(1−bh+bi)∏ph=n+1Γ(ah−bi)×pFq−1[1−ap+bi(1−bq+bi)∗|(−1)p−m−nt] | (1.9) |
and
Gm,np,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=m∑i=1∏nh=1Γ(ai−ah)∗∏mh=1Γ(1−ai+bh)tai−1∏ph=n+1Γ(1−ai+ah)∏qh=m+1Γ(ai−bh)×qFp−1[1−ai+bq(1−ai+ap)∗|(−1)q−m−nt−1], | (1.10) |
with the same conditions on m,n,p,q.
The researchers [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] worked on Meijer G-functions and proved immense amount of properties and applications.
In the last two decades, special functions have gained much attention of the researchers [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] after the development of k-symbol and k-functions by Diaz et al. [39,40] in (2005) and (2007), which are considered to be the generalization of special functions.
Diaz and Pariguan [40], firstly defined generalization of gamma and beta functions in k-form, k>0 as
Γk(a)=limn→∞n!kn(nk)ak−1(a)n,k,k>0,a∈C∖kZ− | (1.11) |
and
βk(a,b)=1k∫10tak−1(1−t)bk−1dt,ℜ(a)>0,ℜ(b)>0, | (1.12) |
where (a)n,k is the Pochhammer k-symbol defined as
(a)n,k={a(a+k)(a+2k)⋯(a+(n−1)k)for n≥11for n=0,a≠0. | (1.13) |
Motivated by Prudnikov [25], our main aim is to obtain the generalization of some functions by keeping in view the idea of the extension and generalization of the special functions. We first define the generalized Meijer G-functions and then find some important relations between the generalized Meijer G-functions and some known generalized special functions. We investigate the relation of generalized Meijer G-functions with Laguerre polynomial, product of Laguerre polynomial with exponential functions, logarithmic functions and confluent hypergeometric functions. These relations will be helpful in different areas especially in mathematical physics and functional field of analysis.
The generalized Meijer G-function in the integral form can be defined as
Gm,nk,p,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=12πi∮LΓk(b1,m−s)Γk(k−a1,n+s)Γk(an+1,p−s)Γk(k−bm+1,q+s)ts/kds, | (1.14) |
where m,n,p,q are orders of G-function with the conditions 0≤m≤q and 0≤n≤p, and ap,bq are parameters, k>0. Also no poles of any Γk(bj−s),j=1,2,...,m coincides with a pole of Γk(k−ai+s),i=1,2,...,n.
The generalized Meijer G-functions in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions are defined as respectively
Gm,nk,p,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=m∑i=1∏mh=1Γk(bh−bi)∗∏nh=1Γk(k−ah+bi)tbik∏qh=m+1Γ(k−bh+bi)∏ph=n+1Γk(ah−bi)×pFq−1,k[k−ap+bi(k−bq+bi)∗|(−1)p−m−nt], | (1.15) |
for p<q and
Gm,nk,p,q[a1,a2,...,apb1,b2,...,bq|t]=m∑i=1∏nh=1Γk(ai−ah)∗∏mh=1Γ(k−ai+bh)taik−1∏ph=n+1Γk(k−ai+ah)∏qh=m+1Γk(ai−bh)×qFp−1,k[k−ai+bq(k−ai+ap)∗|(−1)q−m−nt−1] | (1.16) |
for p>q with the same conditions on m,n,p,q as that of integral definition.
In this section, we prove the relation of generalized Laguerre polynomials and product of Laguerre polynomial with exponential functions in the form of generalized Meijer G-functions.
Theorem 2.1. Let λ be an arbitrary real number and v be a non-negative integer. Then for k>0, the following holds
Lλv,k(t)=Γk(k+λ+vk)G1,0k,1,2[vk+k0,−λ|t]. | (2.1) |
Proof. Applying the definition (1.15) of the generalized Meijer G-function on the right hand side, we have
G1,0k,1,2[vk+k0,−λ|t]=1Γk(k+λ)Γk(vk+k)1F1,k[−vkk+λ|t] |
=(k+λ)v,kΓk(k+λ+vk)kvv!1F1,k[−vkk+λ|t]. |
So,
Γk(k+λ+vk)G1,0k,1,2[vk+k0,−λ|t]=(k+λ)v,kkvv!1F1,k[−vkk+λ|t]. | (2.2) |
The generalized form of Laguerre polynomial (1.5) for k>0, can be defined as
Lλv,k(t)=(k+λ)v,kkvv!1F1,k[−vkk+λ|t]. | (2.3) |
Thus from (2.2) and (2.3), we obtain the desired result.
Corollary 2.1. Let λ be an arbitrary real number and v be a non-negative integer. Then for k>0, the following holds
Lλv,k(1t)=Γk(k+λ+vk)G0,1k,2,1[k,λ+k−vk|t]. | (2.4) |
Proof. By using the definition (1.16) of the generalized Meijer G-function, we have
G0,1k,2,1[k,λ+k−vk|t]=(k+λ)v,kΓk(k+λ+vk)kvv!1F1,k[−vkk+λ|1t]. | (2.5) |
As the Laguerre polynomial for k>0, is defined as
Lλv,k(1t)=(k+λ)v,kkvv!1F1,k[−vkk+λ|1t]. | (2.6) |
Thus from (2.5) and (2.6), we obtain the desired result.
Now, we are considering the product of exponential function with Laguerre polynomial.
Theorem 2.2. Let λ be an arbitrary real number and v be a non-negative integer. Then for k>0, the following holds
e−tLλv,k(t)=1kvv!G1,1k,1,2[−vk−λ0,−λ|t]. | (2.7) |
Proof. By considering the series of exponential and Laguerre polynomial, and taking their product, we have
e−tLλv,k(t)=[∞∑n=0(−t)nn!][(k+λ)v,kkvv!∞∑m=0(−vk)m,ktm(k+λ)m,km!] |
=(k+λ)v,kkvv!∞∑n=0∞∑m=0(−1)n(−vk)m,ktm+n(k+λ)m,km!n! |
=(k+λ)v,kkvv!∞∑n=0(−1)ntn(k+λ+vk)n,k(k+λ)n,kn!. | (2.8) |
By using (1.15), the generalized Meijer G-function on the right hand side of (2.7) will take the following form
G1,1k,1,2[−vk−λ0,−λ|t]=(k+λ)v,k∞∑n=0(−1)ntn(k+λ+vk)n,k(k+λ)n,kn!. | (2.9) |
So, from (2.8) and (2.9), we obtain the desired result.
Corollary 2.2. Let λ be an arbitrary real number and v be a non-negative integer. Then for k>0, the following holds
e−1tLλv,k(1t)=1kvv!G1,1k,2,1[k,λ+kλ+vk+k|t]. | (2.10) |
Proof. By considering the series of exponential and Laguerre polynomial on the lefty hand side and taking their product, we have
e−1tLλv,k(t)=(k+λ)v,kkvv!∞∑n=0(−1)ntn(k+λ+vk)n,k(k+λ)n,kn!. | (2.11) |
By using (1.16), the generalized Meijer G-function on the right hand side of (2.10) will take the form
G1,1k,2,1[k,λ+kλ+vk+k|t]=(k+λ)v,k∞∑n=0(−1)n(k+λ+vk)n,k(k+λ)n,ktnn!. | (2.12) |
So, from (2.11) and (2.12), we obtain the desired result.
Proposition 2.1. Let v be a non-negative integer and λ be zero in theorem (2.2). Then for k>0, the following holds
e−tLv,k(t)=1Γk(vk+k)G1,1k,1,2[−vk0,0|t]. | (2.13) |
Proof. By considering the series of exponential and Laguerre polynomial, and taking their product, we have
e−tLv,k(t)=[∞∑n=0(−t)nn!][∞∑m=0(−vk)m,ktm(k)m,km!] |
=∞∑n=0∞∑m=0(−1)n(−vk)m,ktm+n(k)m,km!n! |
=∞∑n=0(−1)ntn(k+vk)n,kΓk(k+nk)n!. | (2.14) |
By using (1.15), the generalized Meijer G-function on the right hand side of (2.13) will take the form
G1,1k,1,2[−vk0,0|t]=Γk(k+vk)∞∑n=0(−1)ntn(k+vk)n,k(k)n,kn!. | (2.15) |
So, from (2.14) and (2.15), we obtain the required result.
Proposition 2.2. Let v be a non-negative integer and λ be zero in corollary (2.2). Then for k>0, the following holds
e−1tLv,k(1t)=1Γk(k+vk)G1,1k,2,1[k,kvk+k|t]. | (2.16) |
Proof. By adopting the same process as that of corollary (2.2), one can prove easily.
In this section, we prove the relations of generalized Meijer G-functions with generalized form of some known functions as logarithmic functions and confluent hypergeometric functions.
Theorem 3.1. Let p=3, q=3, m=1, n=2 and a1=k, a2=k, a3=k2, b1=k,b2=0 and b3=k2, with k>0 in (1.15). Then for |t|<1, the generalized Meijer G-function gives
G1,2k,3,3[k,k,k2k,0,k2|t]=1k2πln(1−kt). | (3.1) |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15) for given parameters, we have
G1,2k,3,3[k,k,k2k,0,k2|t]=1Γk(2k)Γk(3k2)Γk(−k2)∞∑n=0(k)n,kkntn+1(2k)n,k |
=−1kπ∞∑n=0(k)n,kkntn+1(2k)n,k. | (3.2) |
Since, the Maclaurin series of logarithmic function is
ln(1−kt)=−kt−(kt)22−(kt)33−⋯. | (3.3) |
So, from (3.2) and (3.3), we obtain the required result.
Corollary 3.1. Let p=2, q=2, m=2, n=1 and a1=0, a2=k, b1=0,b2=0 with k>0 in (1.15). Then for |t|<1 the generalized Meijer G-function gives
G2,1k,2,2[0,k0,0|t]=1k2ln(1+kt). | (3.4) |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15) for given parameters, we have
G2,1k,2,2[0,k0,0|t]=1Γk(2k)∞∑n=0(k)n,kkn(−1)n(2k)n,ktn+1 |
=1k∞∑n=0(k)n,kkn(−1)ntn+1(2k)n,k. | (3.5) |
So, we have
G2,1k,2,2[0,k0,0|t]=1k2ln(1+kt). |
The confluent hypergeometric functions can be expressed in the form of generalized Meijer G-functions as follows:
Corollary 3.2. Let p=1,q=2,m=1,n=1 and a1=k−a,b1=0,b2=k−b for k>0. Then from (1.15), the following relation holds
G1,1k,1,2[k−a0,k−b|t]=Γk(a)Γk(b)1F1,k[a0|−t]. | (3.6) |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15) for given parameters we can prove easily.
Proposition 3.1. Let p=1,q=2,m=2,n=1 and a1=k−a,b1=0,b2=k−b for k>0. Then from (1.15), the generalized Meijer G-function can be expressed in the form of generalized confluent hypergeometric function of tricomi as
G2,1k,1,2[k−a0,k−b|t]=Γk(a)Γk(k+a−b)øk(a;b;t), | (3.7) |
where the generalized confluent hypergeometric function of tricomi is defined as
øk(a;b;t)=Γk(b−k)Γk(a−b+k)1F1,k[ab|t]+Γk(k−b)t1−bkΓk(a)1F1,k[a−b+k2k−b|t]. |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15), we can obtain
G2,1k,1,2[k−a0,k−b|t]=Γk(b−k)Γk(a)1F1,k[ab|t]+Γk(k−b)t1−bkΓk(k+a−b)1F1,k[a−b+k2k−b|t], | (3.8) |
from which we get the required result.
Corollary 3.3. Let p=1,q=2,m=1,n=1 and a1=k,a2=b,b1=a for k>0. Then from (1.15), the following relation holds
G1,1k,1,2[k,ba|t]=Γk(a)Γk(b)1F1,k[ab|t]. | (3.9) |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15) for given parameters, we can prove easily.
Proposition 3.2. Let p=2,q=1,m=1,n=2 and a1=k,a2=b,b1=a for k>0. Then from (1.16), the generalized Meijer G-function can be expressed in the form of generalized confluent hypergeometric function of tricomi as
G1,2k,2,1[k,ba|t]=Γk(a)Γk(k+a−b)øk(a;b;1t), | (3.10) |
where the generalized confluent hypergeometric function of tricomi is defined as
øk(a;b;1t)=Γk(k−b)Γk(a−b+k)1F1,k[ab|1t]+Γk(b−k)Γk(a)t1−bk1F1,k[a−b+k2k−b|1t]. |
Proof. By using the definition of generalized Meijer G-function (1.15), we have
G1,2k,2,1[k,ba|t]=Γk(k−b)Γk(a)1F1,k[ab|1t]+Γk(b−k)Γk(k+a−b)tbk−11F1,k[k+a−b2k−b|1t], | (3.11) |
from which we can obtain the desired result.
In this article, we gave the relations of some special functions with the generalized Meijer G-functions. The main focus was on Laguerre polynomials, product of Laguerre polynomials and exponential functions, logarithmic functions, confluent hypergeometric functions. We derived the generalized form of the said functions from generalized Meijer G-functions by choosing different parameters. There are several similar type of functions which can also be expressed in terms of the generalized Meijer G-functions.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | E. D. Rainville, Special functions, New Yark: The Macmillan Company, 1960. |
[2] |
J. D. Konhauser, Biorthogonal polynomials suggested by the Laguerre polynomials, Pacif. J. Math., 21 (1967), 303–314. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1967.21.303
![]() |
[3] |
C. Hwang, Y. P. Shih, Parameter identification via Laguerre polynomials, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 13 (1982), 209–217. doi: 10.1080/00207728208926341
![]() |
[4] |
R. Aktas, E. Erkus-Duman, The Laguerre polynomials in several variables, Math. Slovca, 63 (2013), 531–544. doi: 10.2478/s12175-013-0116-3
![]() |
[5] |
S. Y. Tan, T. R. Huang, Y. M. Chu, Functional inequalities for Gaussian hypergeometric function and generalized elliptic integral of the first kind, Math. Slovaca, 71 (2021), 667–682. doi: 10.1515/ms-2021-0012
![]() |
[6] | M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, New York: Dover, Government Printing Office, 1965. |
[7] |
G. D. Anderson, R. W. Barnard, K. C. Richards, M. K. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 347 (1995), 1713–1723. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1995-1264800-3
![]() |
[8] |
G. Anderson, M. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Inequalities for quasiconformal mappings in space, Pacif. J. Math., 160 (1993), 1–18. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1993.160.1
![]() |
[9] | M. K. Wang, Y. M. Chu, Y. P. Jiang, Ramanujan's cubic transformation inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions, Rocky Mt. J. Math., 46 (2016), 679–691. |
[10] |
S. L. Qiu, X. Y. Ma, Y. M. Chu, Sharp Landen transformation inequalities for hypergeometric functions, with applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 474 (2019), 1306–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.02.018
![]() |
[11] | V. Kiryakova, Generalized fractional calculus and applications, UK: Longman, Harlow, 1994. |
[12] | L. C. Andrews, Special functions for engineers and applied mathematicians, New York: Macmillan, 1985. |
[13] | Y. L. Luke, The special functions and their approximations, New York: Academic Press, 1969. |
[14] | A. Klimyik, Meijer G-function, Berlin: Springer, 2001. |
[15] | R. A. Askey, Meijer G-function, In: D. Adri, B. Olde, NIST handbook of mathematical functions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. |
[16] | A. M. Mathai, R. K. Saxena, H. J. Haubold, The H-function theory and applications, New York, Dordrecht Heidelberg London: Springer, 2009. |
[17] |
R. Beals, J. Szmigielski, Meijer G-function: A gentle introduction, Notices AMS, 60 (2013), 866–872. doi: 10.1090/noti1016
![]() |
[18] | S. Pincherly, Sullefunzioni ipergeometriche generalizzante, Atti R. Accademia Lincei, Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., 4 (1888), 694–700. |
[19] |
H. J. Mellin, Abripeiner einhaitlichen Theorie der Gamma und der Hypergeometrischen Funktionen, Math. Ann., 68 (1910), 305–307. doi: 10.1007/BF01475775
![]() |
[20] |
V. Adamchik, The evaluation of integrals of Bessel functions via G-function identities, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 64 (1995), 283–290. doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(95)00153-0
![]() |
[21] | V. C. Adamchik, O. I. Merichev, The algorithm for calculating integrals of hypergeometric type functions and its realization in reduces system, In: Proceedings of the international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation (ISSAC'90), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1990,212–224. |
[22] | L. J. Slater, Generalized hypergeometric functions, Cambridge University Press, 1966. |
[23] | C. S. Meijer, Expension theorems for the G-function. V, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. v. Wetensch., Ser. A, 60 (1953), 349–397. |
[24] | N. E. Norlund, Hypergeometric functions, Act. Math., 94 (1955), 289–349. |
[25] | A. P. Prudnikov, Y. A. Brychkov, O. I. Marichev, Integrals and series, Volume 3: More special functions, New York: Gordon and Breach, 1990. |
[26] | M. S. Milgram, On some sums of Meijer's G-functions, AECL-5827, 1977. |
[27] | E. R. Hansen, A table of series and products, Prentice-Hall, 1975,425–437. |
[28] | C. G. Kokologiannaki, Properties and inequalities of generalized k-gamma, beta and zeta functions, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 5 (2010), 653–660. |
[29] | C. G. Kokologiannaki, V. Krasniqi, Some properties of k-gamma function, Le Math., 1 (2013), 13–22, |
[30] | V. Krasniqi, A limit for the k-gamma and k-beta function, Int. Math. Forum, 5 (2010), 1613–1617. |
[31] | M. Mansoor, Determining the k-generalized gamma function Γk(x) by functional equations, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 4 (2009), 1037–1042. |
[32] | S. Mubeen, G. M. Habibullah, An integral representation of some k-hypergeometric functions, Int. Math. Forum, 7 (2012), 203–207. |
[33] | S. Mubeen, G. M. Habibullah, k-Fractional integrals and applications, Int. J. Math. Sci., 7 (2012), 89–94. |
[34] | S. Mubeen, A. Rehman, F. Shaheen, Properties of k-gamma, k-beta and k-psi functions, Both. J., 4 (2014), 371–379. |
[35] |
S. Mubeen, Solution of some integral equations involving confluent k-hypergeometric functions, J. Appl. Math., 4 (2013), 9–11. doi: 10.4236/am.2013.47A003
![]() |
[36] | F. Merovci, Power product inequalities for the Γk function, Int. J. Math. Anal., 4 (2010), 1007–1012. |
[37] |
S. Mubeen, A. Rehman, F. Shaheen, Some nequalities involving k-gamma and k-beta functions with applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2014 (2014), 224. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2014-224
![]() |
[38] | S. Mubeen, M. Naz, A. Rehman, G. Rehman, Solutions of k-hypergeometric differentail equations, J. Appl. Math., 2014 (2014), 1–3. |
[39] |
R. Diaz, C. Teruel, q,k-generalized gamma and beta function, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 12 (2005), 118–134. doi: 10.2991/jnmp.2005.12.1.10
![]() |
[40] | R. Diaz, E. Pariguan, On hypergeometric functions and Pochhammer k-symbol, Divulg. Mat., 15 (2007), 179–192. |
1. | Saima Naheed, Shahid Mubeen, Gauhar Rahman, Zareen A. Khan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Certain Integral and Differential Formulas Involving the Product of Srivastava’s Polynomials and Extended Wright Function, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 93, 10.3390/fractalfract6020093 |