Reactive sintering of Al-Mg powder mixtures containing 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% Mg was used to synthesize lightweight composites reinforced with in-situ formed Al3Mg2 and Al12Mg17 intermetallics. Detailed microstructural investigation and phase analysis were employed to examine the phases in the composites formed at 400 and 450 ℃. The creation of particles with the Al12Mg17 cores encapsulated by the Al3Mg2 phase, which was further covered by a continuous aluminum matrix, was observed in the composites synthesized at 400 ℃. If the composites were held at 450 ℃, the liquid phase appeared at the Al-Mg interface, and as a result, a two-phase mixture was formed. It was the eutectic composed of the Al3Mg2 intermetallic compound and a solid solution of magnesium in aluminum (Al). The introduction of magnesium particles into the aluminum matrix resulted in a decrease in the density of composites, but there was no significant difference in the density of composites sintered at different temperatures. The mechanical behavior of the composites was examined using microhardness and hardness measurements and a room-temperature compression test. The result of using different cooling speeds, with the furnace and quenching in water, was the refining of the grains in the Al3Mg2 + (Al) eutectic, resulting in an increase in microhardness. The increase in hardness of the composites was related to the amount of particles introduced. Sintering at 450 ℃ and the cooling method influenced the hardness and compressive strength of the composites, which were higher by 10% and 13%, respectively, compared to composites sintered at 400 ℃. Tribological tests showed that introducing more and more magnesium particles into the aluminum matrix, followed by reactive sintering, increased the wear resistance. On the other hand, the sintering temperature and cooling conditions had little effect on the wear resistance of the Al-Mg composites.
Citation: Marek Konieczny. Mechanical properties and wear characterization of Al-Mg composites synthesized at different temperatures[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 309-322. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024017
Reactive sintering of Al-Mg powder mixtures containing 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% Mg was used to synthesize lightweight composites reinforced with in-situ formed Al3Mg2 and Al12Mg17 intermetallics. Detailed microstructural investigation and phase analysis were employed to examine the phases in the composites formed at 400 and 450 ℃. The creation of particles with the Al12Mg17 cores encapsulated by the Al3Mg2 phase, which was further covered by a continuous aluminum matrix, was observed in the composites synthesized at 400 ℃. If the composites were held at 450 ℃, the liquid phase appeared at the Al-Mg interface, and as a result, a two-phase mixture was formed. It was the eutectic composed of the Al3Mg2 intermetallic compound and a solid solution of magnesium in aluminum (Al). The introduction of magnesium particles into the aluminum matrix resulted in a decrease in the density of composites, but there was no significant difference in the density of composites sintered at different temperatures. The mechanical behavior of the composites was examined using microhardness and hardness measurements and a room-temperature compression test. The result of using different cooling speeds, with the furnace and quenching in water, was the refining of the grains in the Al3Mg2 + (Al) eutectic, resulting in an increase in microhardness. The increase in hardness of the composites was related to the amount of particles introduced. Sintering at 450 ℃ and the cooling method influenced the hardness and compressive strength of the composites, which were higher by 10% and 13%, respectively, compared to composites sintered at 400 ℃. Tribological tests showed that introducing more and more magnesium particles into the aluminum matrix, followed by reactive sintering, increased the wear resistance. On the other hand, the sintering temperature and cooling conditions had little effect on the wear resistance of the Al-Mg composites.
[1] | Miracle D (2005) Metal matrix composites—From science to technological significance. Compos Sci Technol 65: 2526–2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 |
[2] | Han B, Lavernia E, Mohamed F, et al. (2005) Improvement of toughness and ductility of a cryomilled Al-Mg alloy via microstructural modification. Metall Mater Trans A 36: 2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0329-3 doi: 10.1007/s11661-005-0329-3 |
[3] | Vargel C (2004) Corrosion of Aluminium, 1 Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044495-6.X5000-9 |
[4] | Tamura R, Watanabe M, Mamiya H, et al. (2020) Materials informatics approach to understand aluminum alloys. Sci Technol Adv Mat 21: 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2020.1791676 doi: 10.1080/14686996.2020.1791676 |
[5] | Shahid R, Scudino S (2018) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Al-Mg composites synthesized by reactive sintering. Metals 8: 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100762 doi: 10.3390/met8100762 |
[6] | Bodunrin M, Alaneme K, Chown L (2015) Aluminum matrix hybrid composites: A review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J Mater Res Technol 4: 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003 |
[7] | Tosun G, Kurt M (2019) The porosity, microstructure, and hardness of Al-Mg composites reinforced with micro particle SiC/Al2O3 produced using powder metallurgy. Compos Part B-Eng 174: 106965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106965 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106965 |
[8] | Bahl S (2021) Fiber reinforced metal matrix composites—A review. Mater Today 39: 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.423 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.423 |
[9] | Konieczny M (2013) Relations between microstructure and mechanical properties in laminated Ti-intermetallic composites synthesized using Ti and Al foils. Key Eng Mater 592–593: 728–731. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.592-593.728 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.592-593.728 |
[10] | Ardalanniya A, Nourouzi S, Aval H (2021) Fabrication of a laminated aluminum matrix composite using friction stir processing as a cladding method. Mater Sci Eng B 272: 115326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115326 doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115326 |
[11] | Zhao Y, Ding Z, Chen Y (2017) Crystallographic orientations of intermetallic compounds of a multi-pass friction stir processed Al/Mg composite materials. Mater Charact 128: 156–164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.02.005 |
[12] | Yang C, Zhang B, Zhao D, et al. (2017) In-situ synthesis of AlN/Mg-Al composites with high strength and high plasticity. J Alloys Compd 699: 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.005 |
[13] | Kainer K (2006) Metal Matrix Composites: Custom-Made Materials for Automotive and Aerospace Engineering, Weinheim: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527608117 |
[14] | Li G, Jiang W, Guan F, et al. (2023) Preparation, interfacial regulation and strengthening of Mg/Al bimetal fabricated by compound casting: A review. J Magnes Alloy 11: 3059–3098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2023.09.001 |
[15] | Feng B, Xin Y, Guo F, et al. (2016) Compressive mechanical behavior of Al/Mg composite rods with different types of Al sleeve. Acta Mater 120: 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.079 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.079 |
[16] | Li G, Jiang W, Guan F, et al. (2021) Microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of A356 aluminum/AZ91D magnesium bimetal prepared by a compound casting combined with a novel Ni-Cu composite interlayer. J Mater Process Technol 288: 116874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116874 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116874 |
[17] | Predel B (1994) Phase Equilibria, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data of Binary Alloys, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/b47753 |
[18] | Shu J, Yamaguchi T (2020) Growth characteristics of intermetallic compounds on the bond interface of magnesium-clad aluminum and its effect on interface properties. J Light Met Weld 58: 107–112. https://doi.org/10.11283/jlwa.58.107s doi: 10.11283/jlwa.58.107s |
[19] | Vani V, Chak S (2018) The effect of process parameters in aluminum metal matrix composites with powder metallurgy. Manuf Rev 5: 7. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018001 doi: 10.1051/mfreview/2018001 |
[20] | Kim H, Hong S, Kim S (2001) On the rule of mixtures for predicting the mechanical properties of composites with homogenously distributed soft and hard particles. J Mater Process Technol 112: 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00565-9 doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00565-9 |
[21] | Scudino S, Liu G, Sakaliyska M, et al. (2009) Powder metallurgy of Al-based matrix composites reinforced with b-Al3Mg2 intermetallic particles: Analysis and modeling of mechanical properties. Acta Mater 57: 4529–4538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.017 |