A versatile approach towards development of easy-to-clean transparent nanocoating systems with pronounced anti-static properties for various substrates

Nikolaos D. Papadopoulos; Pinelopi P. Falara; Polyxeni Vourna; Nikolaos D. Papadopoulos; Pinelopi P. Falara; Polyxeni Vourna

doi:10.3934/matersci.2023008

AIMS Materials Science

2023, Volume 10, Issue 1: 139-163. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023008

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

A versatile approach towards development of easy-to-clean transparent nanocoating systems with pronounced anti-static properties for various substrates

1.
BFP Advanced Technologies, 11633, Athens, Attiki, Greece
2.
School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Ir. Polytech. St., Zografou, 15780, Greece

Received: 30 September 2022 Revised: 25 December 2022 Accepted: 03 January 2023 Published: 18 January 2023

Sol-gel is a widely applied method for the development of hydrophobic anti-soiling coatings. Most of them however suffer from serious drawbacks which restrict their generic applicability, especially on surfaces with limited number of hydroxyl groups. This study aims to propose a facile and straightforward strategy for the development of an "one-fits-all" anti-soiling coating with strong adhesion to a variety of hard, non-absorbent surfaces. The structure of the proposed composition is based on a two-component coating system consisting of an organopolysilazane primer and an alkoxysilane topcoat, based on a quaternarized ammonium silane. Morphology and microstructure were systematically studied, while hydrophobicity, adhesion, stability, abrasion and chemical resistance were determined on aluminum and PC substrates. The anti-soiling behavior of the proposed coating system was also evaluated. It was found that the polysilazane primer provided mechanical and chemical robustness regardless of substrate type, while the quaternarized silane offered pronounced easy-to-clean and anti-static attributes. The combination of such attributes within a single sol-gel coating system is highly beneficial for numerous applications.

Keywords:

Citation: Nikolaos D. Papadopoulos, Pinelopi P. Falara, Polyxeni Vourna. A versatile approach towards development of easy-to-clean transparent nanocoating systems with pronounced anti-static properties for various substrates[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(1): 139-163. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023008

Related Papers:

[1]	P. Pirmohabbati, A. H. Refahi Sheikhani, H. Saberi Najafi, A. Abdolahzadeh Ziabari . Numerical solution of full fractional Duffing equations with Cubic-Quintic-Heptic nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1621-1641. doi: 10.3934/math.2020110
[2]	SAIRA, Wenxiu Ma, Suliman Khan . An efficient numerical method for highly oscillatory logarithmic-algebraic singular integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 4899-4914. doi: 10.3934/math.2025224
[3]	Kai Wang, Guicang Zhang . Curve construction based on quartic Bernstein-like basis. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5344-5363. doi: 10.3934/math.2020343
[4]	Taher S. Hassan, Amir Abdel Menaem, Hasan Nihal Zaidi, Khalid Alenzi, Bassant M. El-Matary . Improved Kneser-type oscillation criterion for half-linear dynamic equations on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29425-29438. doi: 10.3934/math.20241426
[5]	Dexin Meng . Wronskian-type determinant solutions of the nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2652-2667. doi: 10.3934/math.2025124
[6]	Samia BiBi, Md Yushalify Misro, Muhammad Abbas . Smooth path planning via cubic GHT-Bézier spiral curves based on shortest distance, bending energy and curvature variation energy. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8625-8641. doi: 10.3934/math.2021501
[7]	Chunli Li, Wenchang Chu . Remarkable series concerning $\binom{3n}{n}$ and harmonic numbers in numerators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17234-17258. doi: 10.3934/math.2024837
[8]	Beatriz Campos, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, Pura Vindel . Dynamical analysis of an iterative method with memory on a family of third-degree polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6445-6466. doi: 10.3934/math.2022359
[9]	A. Palanisamy, J. Alzabut, V. Muthulakshmi, S. S. Santra, K. Nonlaopon . Oscillation results for a fractional partial differential system with damping and forcing terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4261-4279. doi: 10.3934/math.2023212
[10]	Tongzhu Li, Ruiyang Lin . Classification of Möbius homogeneous curves in $\mathbb{R}^4$ . AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23027-23046. doi: 10.3934/math.20241119

Abstract

1. Introduction

We consider the following family of nonlinear oscillators

$\begin{equation} y_{zz}+k(y)y_{z}^{3}+h(y)y_{z}^{2}+f(y)y_{z}+g(y) = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $k$ , $h$ , $f\neq0$ and $g\neq0$ are arbitrary sufficiently smooth functions. Particular members of (1.1) are used for the description of various processes in physics, mechanics and so on and they also appear as invariant reductions of nonlinear partial differential equations ^[1,2,3].

Integrability of (1.1) was studied in a number of works ^{[4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]}. In particular, in ^[15] linearization of (1.1) via the following generalized nonlocal transformations

$\begin{equation} w = F(y), \quad d\zeta = (G_{1}(y)y_{z}+G_{2}(y))dz. \end{equation}$

(1.2)

was considered. However, equivalence problems with respect to transformations (1.2) for (1.1) and its integrable nonlinear subcases have not been studied previously. Therefore, in this work we deal with the equivalence problem for (1.1) and its integrable subcase from the Painlevé-Gambier classification. Namely, we construct an equivalence criterion for (1.1) and a non-canonical form of Ince Ⅶ equation ^[17,18]. As a result, we obtain two new integrable subfamilies of (1.1). What is more, we demonstrate that for any equation from (1.1) that satisfy one of these equivalence criteria one can construct an autonomous first integral in the parametric form. Notice that we use Ince Ⅶ equation because it is one of the simplest integrable members of (1.1) with known general solution and known classification of invariant curves.

Moreover, we show that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for equations from (1.1). Since the considered non-canonical form of Ince Ⅶ equation admits two irreducible polynomial invariant curves, we obtain that any equation from (1.1), which is equivalent to it, also admits two invariant curves. These invariant curves can be used for constructing an integrating factor for equations from (1.1) that are equivalent to Ince Ⅶ equation. If this integrating factor is Darboux one, then the corresponding equation is Liouvillian integrable ^[19]. This demonstrates the connection between nonlocal equivalence approach and Darboux integrability theory and its generalizations, which has been recently discussed for a less general class of nonlocal transformations in ^[20,21,22].

The rest of this work is organized as follows. In the next Section we present an equivalence criterion for (1.1) and a non-canonical form of the Ince Ⅶ equation. In addition, we show how to construct an autonomous first integral for an equation from (1.1) satisfying this equivalence criterion. We also demonstrate that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for (1.1). In Section 3 we provide two examples of integrable equations from (1.1) and construct their parametric first integrals, invariant curves and integrating factors. In the last Section we briefly discuss and summarize our results.

2. Main results

We begin with the equivalence criterion between (1.1) and a non-canonical form of the Ince Ⅶ equation, that is ^[17,18]

$\begin{equation} w_{\zeta\zeta}+3w_{\zeta}+\epsilon w^{3}+2w = 0. \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Here $\epsilon\neq0$ is an arbitrary parameter, which can be set, without loss of generality, to be equal to $\pm 1$ .

The general solution of (1.1) is

$\begin{equation} w = {\rm e}^{-(\zeta-\zeta_{0})}\rm{cn}\left\{\sqrt{\epsilon}({\rm e}^{-(\zeta-\zeta_{0})}-C_{1}),\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right\}. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Here $\zeta_{0}$ and $C_{1}$ are arbitrary constants and $\rm{cn}$ is the Jacobian elliptic cosine. Expression (2.2) will be used below for constructing autonomous parametric first integrals for members of (1.1).

The equivalence criterion between (1.1) and (2.1) can be formulated as follows:

Theorem 2.1. Equation (1.1) is equivalent to (2.1) if and only if either

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} (I)\quad 25515lgp^{2}q_{y}+2352980l^{10}+\left(3430q-6667920p^{3}\right) l^{5}\\ -14580qp^{3}-10q^{2}-76545lgqpp_{y} = 0, \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.3)

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} (II)\quad 343l^{5}-972p^{3} = 0, \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.4)

holds. Here

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} l = 9(fg_{y}-gf_{y}+fgh-3kg^{2})-2f^{3}, \quad p = gl_{y}-3lg_{y}+l(f^{2}-3gh),\\ q = 25515g_{y}lp^{2}-5103lgpp_{y}+686l^{5}-8505p^{2}\left( f^{2}-3gh \right) l+6561p^{3}. \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.5)

The expression for $G_{2}$ in each case is either

$\begin{equation} (I) \quad G_{2} = \frac {126 l^{2}qp^{2}}{470596 l^{10}- \left( 1333584 p^{3}+1372 q \right) l^{5}+q^{2}}, \end{equation}$

(2.6)

$\begin{equation} (II) \quad G_{2}^{2} = -\frac{49l^{3}G_{2}+9p^{2}}{189pl}. \end{equation}$

(2.7)

In all cases the functions $F$ and $G_{1}$ are given by

$\begin{equation} F^{2} = \frac{l}{81\epsilon G_{2}^{3}}, \quad G_{1} = \frac{G_{2}(f-3G_{2})}{3g}. \end{equation}$

(2.8)

Proof. We begin with the necessary conditions. Substituting (1.2) into (2.1) we get

$\begin{equation} y_{zz}+k(y)y_{z}^{3}+h(y)y_{z}^{2}+f(y)y_{z}+g(y) = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.9)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} k = \frac{FG_{1}^{3}(\epsilon F^{2}+2)+3G_{1}^{2}F_{y}+G_{1}F_{yy}-F_{y}G_{1,y}}{G_{2}F_{y}}, \\ h = \frac{G_{2}F_{yy}+(6G_{1}G_{2}-G_{2,y})F_{y}+3FG_{2}G_{1}^{2}(\epsilon F^{2}+2)}{G_{2}F_{y}},\\ f = \frac{3G_{2}(F_{y}+FG_{1}(\epsilon F^{2}+2))}{F_{y}}, \quad g = \frac{FG_{2}^{2}(\epsilon F^{2}+2)}{F_{y}}. \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.10)

As a consequence, we obtain that (1.1) can be transformed into (2.1) if it is of the form (2.9) (or (1.1)).

Conversely, if the functions $F$ , $G_{1}$ and $G_{2}$ satisfy (2.10) for some values of $k$ , $h$ , $f$ and $g$ , then (1.1) can be mapped into (2.1) via (1.2). Thus, we see that the compatibility conditions for (2.10) as an overdertmined system of equations for $F$ , $G_{1}$ and $G_{2}$ result in the necessary and sufficient conditions for (1.1) to be equivalent to (2.1) via (1.2).

To obtain the compatibility conditions, we simplify system (2.10) as follows. Using the last two equations from (2.10) we find the expression for $G_{1}$ given in (2.8). Then, with the help of this relation, from (2.10) we find that

$\begin{equation} 81\epsilon F^{2}G_{2}^{3}-l = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.11)

and

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} 567lG_{2}^{3}+(243lgh-81lf^{2}-81gl_{y}+243lg_{y})G_{2}-7l^{2} = 0,\\ 243lgG_{2,y}+324lG_{2}^{3}-81gl_{y}G_{2}+2l^{2} = 0, \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.12)

Here $l$ is given by (2.5).

As a result, we need to find compatibility conditions only for (2.12). In order to find the generic case of this compatibility conditions, we differentiate the first equation twice and find the expression for $G_{2}^{2}$ and condition (2.3). Differentiating the first equation from (2.12) for the third time, we obtain (2.6). Further differentiation does not lead to any new compatibility conditions. Particular case (2.4) can be treated in the similar way.

Finally, we remark that the cases of $l = 0$ , $p = 0$ and $q = 0$ result in the degeneration of transformations (1.2). This completes the proof.

As an immediate corollary of Theorem 2.1 we get

Corollary 2.1. If coefficients of an equation from (1.1) satisfy either (2.3) or (2.4), then an autonomous first integral of this equation can be presented in the parametric form as follows:

$\begin{equation} y = F^{-1}(w), \quad y_{z} = \frac{G_{2}w_{\zeta}}{F_{y}-G_{1}w_{\zeta}}\,. \end{equation}$

(2.13)

Here $w$ is the general solution of (2.1) given by (2.2). Notice also that, formally, (2.13) contains two arbitrary constants, namely $\zeta_{0}$ and $C_{1}$ . However, without loss of generality, one of them can be set equal to zero.

Now we demonstrate that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for equations from (1.1).

First, we need to introduce the definition of an invariant curve for (1.1). We recall that Eq (1.1) can be transformed into an equivalent dynamical system

$\begin{equation} y_{z} = P, \quad u_{z} = Q, \quad P = u, \quad Q = -k u^{3}-h u^{2}-f u -g. \end{equation}$

(2.14)

A smooth function $H(y, u)$ is called an invariant curve of (2.14) (or, equivalently, of (1.1)), if it is a nontrivial solution of ^[19]

$\begin{equation} PH_{y}+QH_{u} = \lambda H, \end{equation}$

(2.15)

for some value of the function $\lambda$ , which is called the cofactor of $H$ .

Second, we need to introduce the equation that is equivalent to (1.1) via (1.2). Substituting (1.2) into (1.1) we get

$\begin{equation} w_{\zeta\zeta}+\tilde{k}w_{\zeta}^{3}+\tilde{h}w_{\zeta}^{2}+\tilde{f}w_{\zeta}+\tilde{g} = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.16)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} \tilde{k} = \frac{kG_{2}^{3}-gG_{1}^{3}+(G_{1,y}-hG_{1})G_{2}^{2}+(fG_{1}-G_{2,y})G_{1}G_{2}}{F_{y}^{2}G_{2}^{2}},\\ \tilde{h} = \frac{(hF_{y}-F_{yy})G_{2}^{2}-(2fG_{1}-G_{2,y})G_{2}F_{y}+3gG_{1}^{2}F_{y}}{F_{y}^{2}G_{2}^{2}},\\ \tilde{f} = \frac{fG_{2}-3gG_{1}}{G_{2}^{2}}, \quad \tilde{g} = \frac{gF_{y}}{G_{2}^{2}}. \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.17)

An invariant curve for (2.16) can be defined in the same way as that for (1.1). Notice that, further, we will denote $w_{\zeta}$ as $v$ .

Theorem 2.2. Suppose that either (1.1) possess an invariant curve $H(y, u)$ with the cofactor $\lambda(y, u)$ or (2.16) possess an invariant curve $\widetilde{H}(w, v)$ with the cofactor $\tilde{\lambda}(w, v)$ . Then, the other equation also has an invariant curve and the corresponding invariant curves and cofactors are connected via

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} H(y,u) = \widetilde{H}\left(F,\frac{F_{y}u}{G_{1}u+G_{2}}\right), \quad \lambda(y,u) = (G_{1}u+G_{2})\tilde{\lambda}\left(F,\frac{F_{y}u}{G_{1}u+G_{2}}\right). \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(2.18)

Proof. Suppose that $\widetilde{H}(w, v)$ is an invariant curve for (2.16) with the cofactor $\widetilde{\lambda}(w, v)$ . Then it satisfies

$\begin{equation} v\widetilde{H}_{w}+(-\tilde{k} v^{3}-\tilde{h} v^{2}-\tilde{f} v -\tilde{g})\widetilde{H}_{v} = \widetilde{\lambda}\widetilde{H}. \end{equation}$

(2.19)

Substituting (1.2) into (2.19) we get

$\begin{equation} uH_{y}+(-k u^{3}-h u^{2}-f u-g)H = (G_{1}u+G_{2}) \tilde{\lambda}\left(F,\frac{F_{y}u}{G_{1}u+G_{2}}\right) H . \end{equation}$

(2.20)

This completes the proof.

As an immediate consequence of Theorem 2.2 we have that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous first integrals admitted by members of (1.1), since they are invariant curves with zero cofactors.

Another corollary of Theorem 2.2 is that any equation from (1.1) that is connected to (2.1) admits two invariant curves that correspond to irreducible polynomial invariant curves of (2.1). This invariant curves of (2.1) and the corresponding cofactors are the following (see, ^[23] formulas (3.18) and (3.19) taking into account scaling transformations)

$\begin{equation} \widetilde{H} = \pm i \sqrt{-2\epsilon}(v+w)+w^{2}, \quad \tilde{\lambda} = \pm \sqrt{-2\epsilon}w-2. \end{equation}$

(2.21)

Therefore, we have that the following statement holds:

Corollary 2.2. If coefficients of an equation from (1.1) satisfy either (2.3) or (2.4), then is admits the following invariant curves with the corresponding cofactors

$\begin{equation} H = \pm i \sqrt{-2\epsilon}\left(\frac{F_{y}u}{G_{1}u+G_{2}}+F\right)+F^{2}, \quad \lambda = \left(G_{1}u+G_{2}\right)\left(\pm \sqrt{-2\epsilon}F-2\right). \end{equation}$

(2.22)

Let us remark that connections between (2.1) and non-autonomous variants of (1.1) can be considered via a non-autonomous generalization of transformations (1.2). However, one of two nonlocally related equations should be autonomous since otherwise nonlocal transformations do not map a differential equation into a differential equation ^[5].

In this Section we have obtained the equivalence criterion between (1.1) and (2.1), that defines two new completely integrable subfamilies of (1.1). We have also demonstrated that members of these subfamilies posses an autonomous parametric first integral and two autonomous invariant curves.

3. Examples

In this Section we provide two examples of integrable equations from (1.1) satisfying integrability conditions from Theorem 2.1.

Example 1. One can show that the coefficients of the following cubic oscillator

$\begin{equation} y_{zz}-\frac{12\epsilon \mu y}{(\epsilon \mu^{2}y^{4}+2)^{2}}y_{z}^{3}-6\mu y y_{z}+2\mu^{2}y^{3}(\epsilon\mu^{2}y^{4}+2) = 0, \end{equation}$

(3.1)

satisfy condition (2.3) from Theorem 2.1. Consequently, Eq (3.1) is completely integrable and its general solution can be obtained from (2.2) by inverting transformations (1.2). However, it is more convenient to use Corollary 2.1 and present the autonomous first integral of (3.1) in the parametric form as follows:

$\begin{equation} y = \pm\sqrt{\frac{w}{\mu}}, \quad y_{z} = \frac{w(\epsilon w^{2}+2) w_{\zeta}}{2w_{\zeta}+w(\epsilon w^{2}+2)}, \end{equation}$

(3.2)

where $w$ is given by (2.2), $\zeta$ is considered as a parameter and $\zeta_{0}$ , without loss of generality, can be set equal to zero. As a result, we see that (3.1) is integrable since it has an autonomous first integral.

Moreover, using Corollary 2.2 one can find invariant curves admitted by (3.1)

$\begin{equation} \begin{gathered} H_{1,2} = \frac{y^{4}\left[(\sqrt{2}\pm \sqrt{-\epsilon}\mu y^{2})^{2}(\sqrt{2}\mp\sqrt{-\epsilon}\mu y^{2})+2(\epsilon\mu y^{2}\mp\sqrt{-2\epsilon})u\right]}{2\mu^{2}y^{2}(\epsilon\mu^{2}y^{4}+2)-4u},\\ \lambda_{1,2} = \pm\frac{2(\mu y^{2}(\epsilon\mu^{2}y^{4}+2)-2u)(\sqrt{-2\epsilon}\mu y^{2}\mp 2)}{y(\epsilon\mu^{2}y^{4}+2)} \end{gathered} \end{equation}$

(3.3)

With the help of the standard technique of the Darboux integrability theory ^[19], it is easy to find the corresponding Darboux integrating factor of (3.1)

$\begin{equation} M = \frac{(\epsilon \mu^{2}y^{4}+2)^{\frac{9}{4}}}{(2\epsilon u^{2}+(\epsilon\mu^{2}y^{4}+2)^{2})^{\frac{3}{4}}(\mu y^{2}(\epsilon \mu^{2}y^{4}+2)-2u)^{\frac{3}{2}}}. \end{equation}$

(3.4)

Consequently, equation is (3.1) Liouvillian integrable.

Example 2. Consider the Liénard (1, 9) equation

$\begin{equation} y_{zz}+(b_{i}y^{i}){y_{z}}+a_{j}y^{j} = 0, \quad i = 0,\ldots 4, \quad j = 0,\ldots,9. \end{equation}$

(3.5)

Here summation over repeated indices is assumed. One can show that this equation is equivalent to (2.1) if it is of the form

$\begin{equation} y_{zz}-9(y+\mu)(y+3\mu)^{3}y_{z}+2y(2y+3\mu)(y+3\mu)^{7} = 0, \end{equation}$

(3.6)

where $\mu$ is an arbitrary constant.

With the help of Corollary 2.1 one can present the first integral of (3.6) in the parametric form as follows:

$\begin{equation} y = \frac{3\sqrt{-2\epsilon}\mu w}{2-\sqrt{-2\epsilon}w}, \quad y_{z} = \frac{7776 \sqrt{2} \epsilon \mu^{5} w w_{\zeta}}{(\sqrt{-2\epsilon}w-2)^{5}(2\sqrt{-\epsilon}w_{\zeta}+(\sqrt{2}\epsilon w +2\sqrt{-\epsilon})w)}, \end{equation}$

(3.7)

where $w$ is given by (2.2). Thus, one can see that (3.5) is completely integrable due to the existence of this parametric autonomous first integral.

Using Corollary 2.2 we find two invariant curves of (3.6):

$\begin{equation} H_{1} = \frac{y^{2}[(2y+3\mu)(y+3\mu)^{4}-2u)]}{(y+3\mu)^{2}[(y+3\mu)^{4}y-u]}, \quad \lambda_{1} = \frac{6\mu(u-y(y+3\mu)^{4})}{y(y+3\mu)}, \end{equation}$

(3.8)

and

$\begin{equation} H_{2} = \frac{y^{2}(y+3\mu)^{2}}{y(y+3\mu)^{4}-u}, \quad \lambda_{2} = \frac{2(2y+3\mu)(u-2y(y+3\mu)^{4})}{y(y+3\mu)}. \end{equation}$

(3.9)

The corresponding Darboux integrating factor is

$\begin{equation} M = \left[y(y+3\mu)^{4}-u\right]^{-\frac{3}{2}}\left[(2y+3\mu)(y+3\mu)^{4}-2u\right]^{-\frac{3}{4}}. \end{equation}$

(3.10)

As a consequence, we see that Eq (3.6) is Liouvillian integrable.

Therefore, we see that equations considered in Examples 1 and 2 are completely integrable from two points of view. First, they possess autonomous parametric first integrals. Second, they have Darboux integrating factors.

4. Conclusions and discussion

In this work we have considered the equivalence problem between family of Eqs (1.1) and its integrable member (2.1), with equivalence transformations given by generalized nonlocal transformations (1.2). We construct the corresponding equivalence criterion in the explicit form, which leads to two new integrable subfamilies of (1.1). We have demonstrated that one can explicitly construct a parametric autonomous first integral for each equation that is equivalent to (2.1) via (1.2). We have also shown that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for (1.1). As a consequence, we have obtained that equations from the obtained integrable subfamilies posses two autonomous invariant curves, which corresponds to the irreducible polynomial invariant curves of (2.1). This fact demonstrate a connection between nonlocal equivalence approach and Darboux and Liouvillian integrability approach. We have illustrate our results by two examples of integrable equations from (1.1).

Acknowledgments

The author was partially supported by Russian Science Foundation grant 19-71-10003.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

[1]	Chundi N, Kesavan G, Ramasamy E, et al. (2021) Ambient condition curable, highly weather stable anti-soiling coating for photovoltaic application. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 230: 111203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111203 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111203
[2]	Ganesh VA, Raut HK, Nair AS, et al. (2011) A review on self-cleaning coatings. J Mater Chem 21: 16304. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12523k doi: 10.1039/c1jm12523k
[3]	Kim D, Kim JG, Kim T, et al. (2021) Long-lasting superhydrophilic and instant hydrophobic micropatterned stainless steel surface by thermally-induced surface layers. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 8: 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00207-5 doi: 10.1007/s40684-020-00207-5
[4]	Zhang H, Liu H, Chen T, et al. (2021) Fabrication of a fast curing super-hydrophobic FEVE/MMA coating and its property research. Mater Sci Eng B 263: 114746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2020.114746 doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2020.114746
[5]	Zhou Y, Liu C, Gao J, et al. (2019) A novel hydrophobic coating film of water-borne fluoro-silicon polyacrylate polyurethane with properties governed by surface self-segregation. Prog Org Coat 134: 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.078 doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.078
[6]	Gao M, Wu X, Gao P, et al. (2019) Properties of hydrophobic carbon-PTFE composite coating with high corrosion resistance by facile preparation on pure Ti. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 29: 2321–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65138-1 doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65138-1
[7]	Xue Y, Wang S, Xue Y, et al. (2020) Robust self‐cleaning and marine anticorrosion super‐hydrophobic Co-Ni/CeO₂ composite coatings. Adv Eng Mater 22: 2000402. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000402 doi: 10.1002/adem.202000402
[8]	Zhang X, Liang J, Liu B, et al. (2014) Preparation of superhydrophobic zinc coating for corrosion protection. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 454: 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.04.029 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.04.029
[9]	Bi, Li, Zhao, et al. (2019) Robust super-hydrophobic coating prepared by electrochemical surface engineering for corrosion protection. Coatings 9: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070452 doi: 10.3390/coatings9070452
[10]	Bai M, Kazi H, Zhang X, et al. (2018) Robust hydrophobic surfaces from suspension HVOF thermal sprayed rare-earth oxide ceramics Coatings. Sci Rep 8: 6973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25375-y doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25375-y
[11]	Zhang C, Wu Y, Liu L (2012) Robust hydrophobic Fe-based amorphous coating by thermal spraying. Appl Phys Lett 101: 121603. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4754140 doi: 10.1063/1.4754140
[12]	Rodič P, Kapun B, Panjan M, et al. (2020) Easy and fast fabrication of self-cleaning and anti-icing perfluoroalkyl silane film on aluminium. Coatings 10: 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10030234 doi: 10.3390/coatings10030234
[13]	Khodaei M, Shadmani S (2019) Superhydrophobicity on aluminum through reactive-etching and TEOS/GPTMS/nano-Al2O3 silane-based nanocomposite coating. Surf Coat Technol 374: 1078–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.074 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.074
[14]	Liang Z, Zhou Z, Zhao L, et al. (2020) Fabrication of transparent, durable and self-cleaning superhydrophobic coatings for solar cells. New J Chem 44: 14481–14489. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ01402H doi: 10.1039/D0NJ01402H
[15]	Shang Q, Zhou Y, Xiao G (2014) A simple method for the fabrication of silica-based superhydrophobic surfaces. J Coat Technol Res 11: 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-014-9573-z doi: 10.1007/s11998-014-9573-z
[16]	Das S, Kumar S, Samal SK, et al. (2018) A review on superhydrophobic polymer nanocoatings: recent development and applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 57: 2727-2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04887 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04887
[17]	Bouvet-Marchand A, Graillot A, Abel M, et al. (2018) Distribution of fluoroalkylsilanes in hydrophobic hybrid sol-gel coatings obtained by co-condensation. J Mater Chem A 6: 24899–24910. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA10191D doi: 10.1039/C8TA10191D
[18]	Vidal K, Gómez E, Goitandia AM, et al. (2019) The synthesis of a superhydrophobic and thermal stable silica coating via sol-gel process. Coatings 9: 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9100627 doi: 10.3390/coatings9100627
[19]	Power AC, Barrett A, Abubakar J, et al. (2016) Versatile self-cleaning coating production through sol-gel chemistry: Versatile self-cleaning coating production. Adv Eng Mater 18: 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201500112 doi: 10.1002/adem.201500112
[20]	Purcar V, Rădițoiu V, Rădițoiu A, et al. (2020) Preparation and characterization of some sol-gel modified silica coatings deposited on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) substrates. Coatings 11: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11010011 doi: 10.3390/coatings11010011
[21]	Özmen E, Durán A, Castro Y (2018) Hydrophobic and oleophobic sol-gel coatings on glass substrates for usage at high temperatures. Int J Appl Glass Sci 9: 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12350 doi: 10.1111/ijag.12350
[22]	Yang Y-Q, Liu L, Hu J-M, et al. (2012) Improved barrier performance of metal alkoxide-modified methyltrimethoxysilane films. Thin Solid Films 520: 2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.041 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.041
[23]	Liu S, Liu X, Latthe SS, et al. (2015) Self-cleaning transparent superhydrophobic coatings through simple sol-gel processing of fluoroalkylsilane. Appl Surf Sci 351: 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.016
[24]	Pratiwi N, Zulhadjri, Arief S, et al. (2020) Self-cleaning material based on superhydrophobic coatings through an environmentally friendly sol-gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 96: 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05389-7 doi: 10.1007/s10971-020-05389-7
[25]	Akustia Widati A, Nuryono N, Kartini I, et al. (2019) Water-repellent glass coated with SiO₂-TiO₂-metyhltrimethoxysilane through sol-gel coating. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 10–24. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2019.1.10 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.1.10
[26]	Ghiotti A, Bertolini R, Pezzato L, et al. (2021) Surface texturing to enhance sol-gel coating performances for biomedical applications. CIRP Ann 70: 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.040 doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.040
[27]	Bertolini R, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A, et al. (2019) Ultrasonic vibration turning to increase the deposition efficiency of a silica-based sol-gel coating. Procedia Manuf 34: 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.126 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.126
[28]	Syafiq A, Vengadaesvaran B, Rahim NAbd, et al. (2019) Transparent self-cleaning coating of modified polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for real outdoor application. Prog Org Coat 131: 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.02.020 doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.02.020
[29]	Chen Z, Li G, Wang L, et al. (2018) A strategy for constructing superhydrophobic multilayer coatings with self-cleaning properties and mechanical durability based on the anchoring effect of organopolysilazane. Mater Des 141: 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.034 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.034
[30]	Sutar RS, Gaikwad SS, Latthe SS, et al. (2020) Superhydrophobic nanocomposite coatings of hydrophobic silica NPs and poly(methyl methacrylate) with notable self‐cleaning ability. Macromol Symp 393: 2000116. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202000116 doi: 10.1002/masy.202000116
[31]	Suriano R, Ciapponi R, Griffini G, et al. (2017) Fluorinated zirconia-based sol-gel hybrid coatings on polycarbonate with high durability and improved scratch resistance. Surf Coat Technol 311: 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.095 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.095
[32]	Zhang LB, Zhang HX, Liu ZJ, et al. (2023) Nano-silica anti-icing coatings for protecting wind-power turbine fan blades. J Colloid Interface Sci 630: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.09.154 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.09.154
[33]	Zhan Y, Grottenmüller R, Li W, et al. (2021) Evaluation of mechanical properties and hydrophobicity of room-temperature, moisture-curable polysilazane coatings. J Appl Polym Sci 138: 50469. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50469 doi: 10.1002/app.50469
[34]	Rossi S, Deflorian F, Fedel M (2019) Polysilazane-based coatings: corrosion protection and anti-graffiti properties. Surf Eng 35: 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2018.1465748 doi: 10.1080/02670844.2018.1465748
[35]	Arkles B, Silane coupling agents: Connecting across boundaries, Gelest, Inc., 2014. Available from: https://www.gelest.com/wp-content/uploads/Silane_Coupling_Agents.pdf.
[36]	Ogoshi T, Chujo Y (2005) Organic-inorganic polymer hybrids prepared by the sol-gel method. Compos Interfaces 11: 539–566. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568554053148735 doi: 10.1163/1568554053148735
[37]	Gong X, He S (2020) Highly durable superhydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane/silica nanocomposite surfaces with good self-cleaning ability. ACS Omega 5: 4100–4108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03775 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03775
[38]	Chen Z, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. (2015) Highly transparent, stable, and superhydrophobic coatings based on gradient structure design and fast regeneration from physical damage. Appl Surf Sci 359: 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.150 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.150
[39]	Wu X, Chen Z (2018) A mechanically robust transparent coating for anti-icing and self-cleaning applications. J Mater Chem A 6: 16043–16052. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA05692G doi: 10.1039/C8TA05692G
[40]	Lee JW, Heo JH, Lee B, et al. (2019) Enhancement in the adhesion properties of polycarbonate surfaces through chemical functionalization with organosilicon coupling agents. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30: 17773–17779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02128-9 doi: 10.1007/s10854-019-02128-9

matersci-10-01-008-s01.pdf

This article has been cited by:

1.	Dmitry I. Sinelshchikov, Linearizabiliy and Lax representations for cubic autonomous and non-autonomous nonlinear oscillators, 2023, 01672789, 133721, 10.1016/j.physd.2023.133721
2.	Jaume Giné, Xavier Santallusia, Integrability via algebraic changes of variables, 2024, 184, 09600779, 115026, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115026
3.	Meryem Belattar, Rachid Cheurfa, Ahmed Bendjeddou, Paulo Santana, A class of nonlinear oscillators with non-autonomous first integrals and algebraic limit cycles, 2023, 14173875, 1, 10.14232/ejqtde.2023.1.50
4.	Jaume Giné, Dmitry Sinelshchikov, Integrability of Oscillators and Transcendental Invariant Curves, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01182-x

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)