Review Topical Sections

A systematic review on recent progress in advanced joining techniques of the lightweight materials

  • We are living in a time where the emphasis is given on the development of new and improved materials having high strength and are correspondingly light in weight for application in fields such as transportation, aerospace, medical and other such related areas. These new materials developed need to be processed and joined with oneself and other materials as well. The paper presents a brief understanding of the advanced joining processes namely friction stir welding, microwave hybrid heating, electron beam welding, laser beam welding, thermo-hydrogenated diffusion bonding, electromagnetic welding and ultra sonic welding. The purpose of these advanced joining techniques is to increase the efficiency of the joining process and prevent failure. The objective of this review paper is to provide an insight into the principles, current trends and research gaps in advanced joining techniques.

    Citation: Shashi Bahl, Tarunpreet Singh, Virinder Kumar, Shankar Sehgal, Ashok Kumar Bagha. A systematic review on recent progress in advanced joining techniques of the lightweight materials[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(1): 62-81. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Harish Mooli, Srinivasa Rao Seeram, Satyanarayana Goteti, Nageswara Rao Boggarapu . Optimal weld bead profiles in the conduction mode LBW of thin Ti–6Al–4V alloy sheets. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 698-715. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021042
    [2] Ehsan Harati, Paul Kah . Laser welding of aluminum battery tab to variable Al/Cu busbars in Li-ion battery joint. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(6): 884-918. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022053
    [3] Francois Njock Bayock, Paul Kah, Kibong Marius Tony . Heat input effects on mechanical constraints and microstructural constituents of MAG and laser 316L austenitic stainless-steel welded joints. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(2): 236-254. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022014
    [4] Utpal K. Dhar, Md. Farabi Rahman, Mustafa Oguzhan Ayanoglu, Ahammad Abdullah . Welding on C67 steel grade sheet: Influence of the parameters and post welding heat treatment. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(3): 453-464. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023025
    [5] Paul Kah, Pavel Layus, Benoit Ndiwe . Submerged arc welding process peculiarities in application for Arctic structures. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(3): 498-511. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022029
    [6] Sharlane Costa, Maria S. Souza, Manuel B. César, José Gonçalves, João E. Ribeiro . Experimental and numerical study to minimize the residual stresses in welding of 6082-T6 aluminum alloy. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(2): 271-282. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021018
    [7] N. S. Biradar . Effect of transverse mechanical arc oscillation on hot cracking (solidification & liquation) and weld metal properties of AA2014 T6 TIG welds. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(4): 1544-1560. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.4.1544
    [8] Francisco J. G. Silva, Rita C. M. Sales-Contini . Advances in laser materials and processing technologies: An overview. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(1): 23-27. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025002
    [9] Rafael Resende Lucas, Rita de Cássia Mendonça Sales-Contini, Luis Felipe Barbosa Marques, Jonas Frank Reis, Ana Beatriz Ramos Moreira Abrahão, Edson Cocchieri Botelho, Rogério Pinto Mota . Characterization of the hybrid joint between AA2024-T3 alloy and thermoplastic composite obtained by oxy-fuel welding (OFW). AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(3): 585-601. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024029
    [10] G. A. El-Awadi . Review of effective techniques for surface engineering material modification for a variety of applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(4): 652-692. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023037
  • We are living in a time where the emphasis is given on the development of new and improved materials having high strength and are correspondingly light in weight for application in fields such as transportation, aerospace, medical and other such related areas. These new materials developed need to be processed and joined with oneself and other materials as well. The paper presents a brief understanding of the advanced joining processes namely friction stir welding, microwave hybrid heating, electron beam welding, laser beam welding, thermo-hydrogenated diffusion bonding, electromagnetic welding and ultra sonic welding. The purpose of these advanced joining techniques is to increase the efficiency of the joining process and prevent failure. The objective of this review paper is to provide an insight into the principles, current trends and research gaps in advanced joining techniques.



    Joining is the process of combining a broad spectrum of materials using three basic techniques of temporary or permanent fastening, adhesive bonding and welding. Generally, the products which we use in our daily life are multi-materials because using different materials increases design flexibility and functionality. These give rise to the high demand for materials which are having high tensile strength, light in weight and environmentally inert in fields such as automotive, aerospace, electronics, medical and marine. New and improved alloys of titanium [1,2,3], aluminum [4,5], nickel [6], copper [7,8,9] and stainless steel [10,11,12] are now in use because of the properties they possess which are desirable. Table 1 presents the abundance of elements in earth's crust [13]. Titanium being the ninth most abundant element of earth's crust and fourth most widely available structural element is comparatively lighter than the originally engaged materials such as nickel (Ni), copper (Cu) and stainless steel (SS). The strength of Ti is the same as steel but is less dense than it and has a high melting temperature of about 1670 ºС, which makes it functional even at elevated temperatures [14]. Moreover, it has high corrosion resistance, fatigue resistance, crack resistance and biocompatibility. Ti is currently in use in aerospace [15], marine [16] and biomedical [17] industry. Ti can be welded using traditional welding processes such as plasma arc welding [18] and gas tungsten arc welding [19]. These joints formed have low ductility, high residual stresses and easy deformation characteristics [20,21].

    Table 1.  Earth's crust element abundance [13].
    Rank Element Symbol Atomic number Earth's crust abundance
    1 Oxygen O 8 46.60
    2 Silicon Si 14 27.70
    3 Aluminum Al 13 8.13
    4 Iron Fe 26 5.00
    5 Calcium Ca 20 3.63
    6 Sodium Na 11 2.83
    7 Magnesium Mg 12 2.59
    8 Potassium K 19 2.09
    9 Titanium Ti 22 0.44
    10 Hydrogen H 1 0.14
    23 Nickel Ni 28 0.009

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Aluminum (Al) is the third most abundant element of the earth's crust and most widely available structural element. The aluminum alloys have high specific strength, corrosion resistance, low density, high conductivity and on top of it, it can easily be processed [22]. These alloys offer high strength to weight ratio in addition to enhanced design adaptability [23]. These advantageous properties have aided it to find applications in aerospace [24], automobile [25], naval [26], weapons [27] and electronics industry. When Al alloys are welded using fusion welding processes it leads to hot cracking, oxide layer formation and poor weld strength because of low molten viscosity, high reflectivity and intrinsic oxide layer formation [28]. Stainless steel (SS) is an iron (Fe) based alloy containing approximately 11% chromium (Cr) and 0.03–1% carbon (C). Common alloying elements include manganese (Mn), nitrogen (N), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), sulphur (S), titanium (Ti), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), selenium (Se), niobium (Nb) and molybdenum (Mo) [29]. SS has many desirable characteristics such as excellent mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, ease of maintenance, sustainability and recyclability which can be exploited in aerospace [23], automobile [30] construction [31] and marine [32] applications. SS can be welded using fusion welding but upon cooling crack propagation of the weld starts which makes post-welding and pre-welding heat treatment compulsory [33].

    Inconel is a nickel (Ni) and chromium (Cr) based super alloy, it exhibits superior mechanical properties and corrosion resistance [34]. Owing to these properties it has found applications in aerospace [35], petrochemical [36] and nuclear [37] industry. Products generally which require such material properties also require complex geometries and low tolerance values. Selective laser melting (SLM) is exercised for producing Inconel parts but this technique has a limited working volume [38]. So, to large components, these smaller parts need to be joined together. Due to presence of Laves phase there is a serious defect of micro fissuring or liquation cracking in Inconel welds. The limitations of traditional welding techniques as discussed above cause decreases employability of many metals and alloy which are best suited for an application. To overcome these, advanced joining techniques namely friction stir welding (FSW), microwave hybrid heating (MHH), electron beam welding (EBM), laser beam welding (LBM), thermo-hydrogenated diffusion bonding, electromagnetic welding (EMW) and ultra sonic welding (USW) are utilized. The objective of this review paper is to provide a brief understanding of the advanced joining techniques principle, current trends and research gap for follow on study. Table 2 presents the principle, process parameters, joint configuration and materials processed for various joining techniques.

    Table 2.  The principle, process parameters, joint configuration and materials processed for different advanced joining techniques.
    Technique Principle Process parameters Joint configuration Materials processed References
    Friction stir welding (FSW) Welding due to heat generated between work piece and tool because of the rotation, translation motion and mechanical pressure on the tool Tool geometry, tool offset, rotational spindle speed, translation tool speed, tool tilt angle Butt joint, T joint Al/Mg alloys, Al/Cu alloys, Al alloys, Ti alloys, Mg alloys, Ni alloys [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]
    Microwave hybrid heating (MHH) Welding by utilizing microwave radiations and concentrating them at the joining region Size of susceptor powder, feeder diameter, feeder height, insulation brick thickness, separator thickness, size of interface powder, exposure time Butt joint Mild steel, stainless steel, Ni alloys, MS/SS, Al alloys, Cu [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]
    Electron beam welding (EBW) Kinetic energy of electrons is utilized to melt and join the work piece together Welding speed, beam oscillation pattern, beam offset, input voltage Butt joint, corner joint, T joint Ni alloys, Ti alloys, Al–Cu–Li alloys, stainless steel, SS/Cu alloy, Fe/Al alloys, Ni/stainless steel [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]
    Laser beam welding (LBW) LASER is employed to convert is light energy to heat energy for melting and joining the work piece Input voltage, welding speed, focal position, clamp pressure, oscillation radius, oscillation frequency Butt joint, lap joint, T joint Stainless steel/ABS, NiTishape alloys, Al/plastic, plastic, stainless steel/plastic, Ti/plastic, Al alloys [67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]
    Thermo hydrogenated diffusion bonding Solid state joining under high temperature and pressure in which one/both of the base materials are hydrogenated before bonding Hydrogen weight percentage, bonding temperature, holding time, clamp pressure, heating rate Lap joint SS/Ti alloys, Ti alloys, Ti/Ni alloys [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]
    Electromagnetic welding (EMW) Employing electromagnetic fore to weld the work piece similar to explosive welding Current frequency, input voltage, standoff distance Lap joint SS/Al alloy, Al alloys, Al/Cu, Al/Mg alloys, Al/metallic glass, Al/carbon steel [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]
    Ultrasonic welding (USW) Welding takes place due to the mechanical force and the oscillating force between the sonotrode and work piece Ultrasonic power, welding pressure, interlayer thickness, welding time Butt joint, lap joint Al alloys, Al/stainless steel, Al/Cu, steel alloy, stainless steel, AlMg3/composite, Al/Ti alloys, composite [95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Thomas et al. [105] developed this technique of friction stir welding (FSW) back in 1990 for joining low-temperature material such as Al alloys while working at Welding Institute and has been termed as the most promising welding technique. In FSW, a non-consumable tool having a pin and a shoulder is engaged, the shoulder of the tool rides along the surface and generate a large fraction of the total heat as it is rotating. The pin penetrates the material shorter than the depth of the material. The heat generated by the rotation, translational motion and the mechanical pressure on the tool causes the localized heating of the interface which softens the material and locally forges the work piece without melting it.

    Singh et al. [41] studied the FSW of Al–Mg Alloys and observed that proper selection of the tool geometry improves the material flow behavior. They concluded that threaded pin enhances the joint efficiency, the cooling system enhances the joint reliability and post weld heat treatment (PWHT) improves the weld grain structure. This is due to the reason that the pin geometry is one of the key parameter in friction stir welding. The addition of threads and flutes increase the area of the pin which in turn increases the heat input to the joint, thus producing a defect free joint. The cooling of the weld helps in fabricating ultrafine grain joints because it produces the flow stress conditions required for plastic deformation of the material by limiting the temperature. As the rate of cooling increases the weld nugget zone decreases.

    Hou et al. [106] investigated the role of tool offset in FSW of Al and Cu under optimized process parameters and observed that the tool offset influenced surface quality of the joint and the peak temperature which increases as the tool offset decreased. A large offset of more than 1.6 mm gave poor weld and maximum UTS of 152 MPa was achieved at 1.2 mm. Hasan et al. [107] compared five different tools for the influence of machine variables and tool profile on the tensile strength of dissimilar AA7075–AA6061 and observed that tapered threaded and flat pins resulted in weld having high tensile strength and good surface finish whereas smooth cylindrical pins gave lower joint strength. Aali [108] studied the role of spindle rotation rate on FSW of Ti4Al2V alloy and concluded that as the rotational speed increases the hardness of the weld zone increase and also found that for achieving optimal weld properties, coordination between transverse speed and rotational speed should be maintained.

    Shah et al. [43] experimented with the tool tilt angle on FSW of Al alloys and concluded that the tool tilt angle influences the mode of fracture of the weld and the 2° tilt angle gave highest tensile strength of the weld. Sun et al. [45] investigated the mechanical properties of butt joints of AZ61 Mg alloy and found that the ratio of transverse speed to rotational of 3 provided average joint efficiency of 100.8%. Malopheyev et al. [44] studied the FSW 6061-T6 Al alloy and found increasing the welding speed stalled the precipitation coarsening, improving the macro-scale uniformity which enabled the recovery of the weld strength. Speed of 760 mm/min established the joint efficiency of yield strength of 93% and post-weld heat treatment completely recovers the weld strength. Costa et al. [42] compared the per meter cost of FSW and resistance seam welding (RSW) and concluded that FSW was more economical than RSW of thin Al sheets. Sato et al. [46] investigated the effect of microstructure of Inconel 600 alloy using polycrystalline boron nitride (PCBN) tool in FSW and found that weld had better mechanical properties than the base metal. Song et al. [47] studied the FSW of Inconel 625 alloy and established that FSW preceded to grain refinement thus improving mechanical properties as compared to the base material. Li et al. [109] fabricated successfully the defect free additive and non-additive T Joints using shoulder FSW. The fatigue fracture was determined by the stress concentration. The process parameters of FSW such as transverse speed, rotational speed, axial force, tool tilt angle and tool offset are important in producing a high strength weld, therefore selection criteria should be generalized for these process parameters.

    Microwave hybrid heating (MHH) is an advance joining process utilizing electromagnetic radiations of wavelength varying from 1 m to 1 mm and frequency between 300 MHz and 300 GHz for different wavelengths for joining materials [110,111,112]. The insulation brick has a cavity to hold the work piece and the refractory brick has a hole drilled for the susceptor powder which absorbs the electromagnetic radiations and concentrates them over the joining region. A graphite sheet is used as a separator to prevent the mixing of susceptor material and work piece. Localized selective heating, low power consumption, decreased sintering temperature and being environment friendly pave the way for its promising future.

    Gamit et al. [48] postulated that susceptor powder was the most crucial factor in heating and melting of the work piece and, as the size of the powder decreases energy transfer to the work piece increases. Kumar et al. [54] studied the MHH of SS without using filler material and established that due to the uniform volumetric heating the joint exhibited homogenous microstructure. After the hardness testing, it was found that the joint region was harder than the base material because of absorption of carbon from the graphite sheet. Sharma et al. [49] investigated the process parameter in MHH of Inconel 625 alloy and concluded that diameter of the feeder was the most significant factor (among insulation brick thickness, separator thickness and feeder diameter) as it directly affects the separator sheet thickness. Gupta et al. [55] studied the MHH of mild steel (MS) and SS using Ni as an interface material and successfully obtained a fine microstructure of the joint and a proper fusion of the material of the took place. Bagha et al. [50] joined SS304 using Ni as an interface material and postulated the optimal value of Nickel–Blumer ratio of 75:25 which produced the best results. Correspondingly, found that as the size of Ni powder decreased hardness of the weld increased but ductility of the weld was compromised. Singh et al. [56] successfully joined Al alloy plates with MHH using an Al slurry which melted to form a homogenous dense joint.

    Pal et al. [52] optimized the MHH process of joining SS304–SS304, SS304–SS316 and SS316–SS316 using Taguchi Philosophy. Here, three different sizes of Ni powder and three different processing times were used. Srinath et al. [113] compared the simulation and experimental results of MHH of bulk copper and found that they were in good qualitative and quantitative agreement. Badiger et al. [51] optimized the parameters for MHH of Inconel 625 and obtained higher values of tensile strength using graphite separator, SiC susceptor and a fine filler powder. The ANOVA results concluded that the particle size of the interface was the most significant parameter followed by separator and susceptor material. Samyal et al. [53] predicted the exposure time of SS using MHH by fixing some parameters which affected the exposure time and joint strength. They also established a relation between the refractory bricks and specimen dimensions which also influenced the vertical-cavity dimension. Bhoi et al. [114] studied susceptor material for MHH and postulated that for low temperature application susceptor assisted crucible for suitable, charcoal was appropriate for a temperature range of 500–600 ºС and SiC should be used for high temperature applications. Lingappa et al. [115] investigated the bulk melting of non-ferrous materials such as Tin, Zinc, Al and brass and from the time temperature curve of the material concluded that the rate of temperature increase is linear up to critical temperature and shoots up rapidly as microwave starts coupling with bulk material.

    Due to the inadequate understanding of microwave interaction with different materials, this joining technique is limited to only a few materials. There is an increasing requirement to study this phenomenon with advanced materials and optimizing the process parameters and developing mathematical relations between the parameters and the work piece of similar/dissimilar material.

    Electron Beam Welding (EBM) was developed by a German physicist Karl-Heinz in 1958 and is one of the most promising joining technique because of its high quality of the weld and deep penetration [116]. EBW is a liquid state welding process using an electron's kinetic energy to fuse the work piece. A jet of high-velocity electrons strikes the work piece thus, converting the kinetic energy to heat energy which melts the work piece and fuse them. The EBW setup is enclosed in a vacuum chamber. A power source is used to supply a continuous beam on electron; its power rating depends upon the thickness of the weld. The electron gun is the most crucial component of the setup, which is a cathode tube generating and accelerating the electrons. The purpose of the anode tube is to attract and focus these electrons onto a fixed spot and a series of magnetic lenses helps intensifying the electron beam by absorbing low energy divergent electrons.

    Richards et al. [57] studied the influence of EBW parameters on heat affected zone (HAZ) micro fissuring in Inconel 903 and found that lower welding speed and high current for a particular heat input significantly reduces micro fissuring. In electron beam machining, as the welding speed decreases and current input increases large amount of energy is transferred to the weld material in a substantial amount of time which results in low rate of temperature rise and leads to shallower cooling rate. As the solidification time increases, it allows more time for the temperature gradient to fall off and low welding speed produces shallower temperature gradients whereas in case of high welding speed there is a steep temperature gradient. When more time is allotted for the temperature gradient to drop off in the heat affected zone, the maximum thermal stress and rate of extension on liquid film decline which in turn decreases the tendency of heat affected zone micro fissuring.

    Iltaf et al. [60] compared three oscillating patterns of EBW of Ti5Al2.5Sn and concluded that the arrow pattern had higher hardness than elliptical and concentric circle pattern, whereas they had higher ductility and notch toughness due to the presence of β phase in greater amount and uniform microstructure respectively. Peng et al. [64] experimentally investigated the mechanical properties and microstructure of EBW of Inconel 718 and discovered the grain size in the HAZ gradually decreased from top to bottom of 12 mm thick Inconel 718 plate. Zhang et al. [66] systematically investigated and optimized the process parameters for EBW of Al–Cu–Li alloy and developed an inverse relation between weld porosity and heat input. As the porosity decreased the mechanical properties were increased. Singh et al. [63] compared the low and high heat input in EBW of 2205 duplex SS and found fine grain microstructure in lower heat input weld. Higher micro hardness than the base material was revealed in both the case. Impact toughness was significantly reduced in the weld as well as the base material.

    Zhang et al. [58] employed EBW for welding of 304 SS to QCr0.8 Cu alloy using a Cu filler wire and postulated that the beam current was significant factor followed by welding speed, wire feed rate and beam offset. Dinda et al. [61] studied the EBW of carbon steel and Fe–Al alloy under different weld conditions. It was revealed that the oscillating beam resulted in uniform and homogenous microstructure and subsequently increasing the welding speed promoted fine-grain growth. Guo et al. [62] successfully welded Ti6Al4V and T2Cu using EBW, which initially resulted in poor weldability but as the electron beam was shifted to Cu side with an offset of 1.4 mm the strength of the weld increased and subsequently increasing the offset increased the strength but also increased brittleness due to the thickening of the intermetallic compound layer. Sharma et al. [65] investigated the effect of EBW on the properties of Inconel 718 and found significant microstructure refinement and no modification in the corrosion properties. Derakhshi et al. [59] addressed the EBW of Inconel 617 and AISI310, initially, the weld was weaker in corrosion resistance than parent material but as the welding speed increased the corrosion-resistant behavior of the weld improved. Emphasis is given on EBW of Inconel super alloys but certain serious defects such as liquation cracking (micro fissuring) and fusion zone cracking exist in the weld owing to the presence of Laves phase.

    Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) is a highly intense, direction monochromatic radiation. Laser beam welding (LBW) employs LASER for generating a concentrated heat source for deep penetration of the base material. LBW is a clean welding technique converting heat energy in light energy for joining similar/dissimilar materials [117]. In most practical cases, Nd:YAG crystal is used as for fabricating solid state lasers. Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) is doped with triply ionized neodymium, Nd (III). Only a fraction of the host material is doped with Nd. Nd provide the same effect as Cr in ruby crystals. Generally the active medium for producing laser used is glass or crystalline material which is doped with rare earth elements in most case such as neodymium, chromium, erbium, thulium or ytterbium because their excitation levels can be easily achieved [67,68].

    Noh et al. [70] optimized the process parameters for joining SS304 and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) to process stronger welds. Results from ANOVA concluded welding speed has the maximum effect on the weld followed by laser power. Mehrpouya et al. [75] reviewed the LBW of NiTi shape memory alloy and found cracking in the weld zone which could be treated using stress 236 relieving but in significantly degraded the shape memory effect. PWHT was found to be an effective process retrieving the shape memory effect and improving mechanical properties. The PWHT of NiTi shape memory alloy was extensively discussed by Oliveira et al. [118] to recover and improve the properties of NiTi alloys. The paper also presented a detailed review of joining processes of NiTi in similar and dissimilar combinations considering both fusion and solid-state processes and LBW of NiTi was discussed in detail. Bideskan et al. [71] optimized the process parameters for joining of PMMA and AL 6061-T6 laminates and concluded that the focal position followed by laser power has the significant effect on lap shear strength and weld seam width. It was also established that the increase in laser power and an intermediate value of welding speed and focal position produced strong joint. Hao et al. [73] optimized the process parameters for welding of PET and via beam oscillation to produce homogeneous welds without thermal degradation and lack of fusion and shear force was increased by 26% of the sample without beam oscillation. Sayyad et al. [119] studied the effect of laser pre-treatment of Al before LBW of it to polyamide assemblies 6.6 (PA6.6) and concluded that pre-treatment has a strong influence on the weld shear strength.

    Amend et al. [120] reviewed the LBW of PC–Al and PA–Alhybrids and found it to be a suitable solution for joining of metal-polymer hybrid components. Katayama et al. [76] successfully welded SS304 and PET sheets using LBW producing strong joints. Chen et al. [121] investigated the effect of ultrasound on LBW of PET and Ti and concluded that the joint formed using ultrasonic aid produced joints having higher ultimate tensile strength than the joints formed without ultrasonic aid. Liu et al. [72] studied the high-speed laser lap joining of Al and polymer with the welding speed of 5m/min fabricating good quality and strong joints which was attributed to the formation of C–O–Al bonds. Shangren et al. [74] experimentally investigated the effect beam oscillation on the LBW of Al alloy and concluded that weld depth and porosity significantly decreased as the frequency of oscillation and diameter increased. It was established oscillation can refine the grain structure and increase tensile strength of weld. Xiao et al. [122] reviewed the LBW of Al–Li alloys and only a reliable weld was formed with decreased mechanical strength and poor ductility.

    Al–Li alloys are a suitable candidate for replacing Al alloys in aerospace application due to more favorable properties. The LBW of Al–Li alloys show poor ductility, material vaporization, bad weld formation and defects such as keyhole porosity and undercut. There is a need to study the reasons behind these limitations of LBW in Al–Li alloy. Optimizing the process parameters and analyzing the effect of filler material and pre/post-weld treatment will be beneficial.

    Diffusion welding (DW) is a traditional solid-state joining process in which similar/dissimilar materials are welded together to a form single product under the application of high temperature and mechanical pressure. When DW was employed to weld Ti alloys and Ni alloys the joint strength was highly affected by the formation of the intermetallic formed. The effect of different interface layers was studied on DW of Ti and Ni alloys such as Cu [123], Ni/Ti [124] and silver [125]. Most favorable and viable results were yielded when one/both of the specimens were hydrogenated in a furnace or the interlayer material can be hydrogenated.For hydrogenating the sample it is first heated in a furnace up to the transformation temperature and then cooled in a hydrogen atmosphere. The concentration of hydrogen is controlled by controlling the charging time and the actual concentration is measured by weighing the sample before and after the process. This hydrogenation of sample improves diffusion bonding by improving plastic deformation and diffusion ability of metal materials. Zhang et al. [77] experimentally investigated the Hydrogenated DW of TC4-0.3 H/Nb/GH3128 and found that as the bonding temperature increased the void gradually decreased and disappeared at 860 ºС and when TC4-0.3H/GH3128 couples were bonded using Nb/Ni foil the weak (Ni, Cr)ss layer was completely eliminated from the interface.

    Zhu et al. [78] studied the diffusion bonding (DB) of weaker Ti6Al4V and Ti2AlNb alloy which had a large mismatch of hot strength and addition of hydrogen (H) further widens the gap. The solution found was to employ a fast heating rate to inhibit H depletion and oxidation before onset DB. The DW of the alloys can be done by hydrogenating both of them to 0.2% wt H followed by fast heating and dwelling. Shanthala et al. [83] compared the DW of hydrogenated and un-hydrogenated CP Ti with SS and found that the joint at with hydrogenated CP Ti can be made plausible at a relatively lower temperature than the other. Wang et al. [79] studied the DW of TiAl and Ti2AlNb with hydrogenated Nb foil as interlayer material and compared it with employing pure Nb foil as interlayer and found that the former contained fewer defects and thicker diffusion layer than the latter. As the hydrogen content increased the bonding temperature, thickness and shear strength improved significantly.

    He et al. [82] investigated the DW of TiAl and Ni super alloys with hydrogenated Ti6Al4V interlayer and compared it's results with no interlayer material and former produced a joint having high shear strength than the latter and the parameters significantly decreased. In the hydrogenated interlayer process, faster heating was more favorable than slow cooling. He et al. [84] compared the results direct DW of TiAl and using Ti6Al4V interlayer the welding parameters decreased and shear strength increased. Feng et al. [80] studied the effect of hydrogen on DW of hydrogenated Ti6Al4V alloys and observed that the void at the interface decreased as the bonding temperature increased and found faster cooling rate more favorable as it prevented the escape of H and oxidation of the joint surface thus improving bond quality.

    Wu et al. [81] experimentally investigated the effect of hydrogen on DW of Ti55 alloy and concluded that as the hydrogen content increased from 0.3 to 0.5% wt the bonding ratio and shear strength increased due to grain refinement and increase in the volume fraction of β phase. Wang et al. [85] fabricated a strong weld of TC4 alloy using DW with hydrogenated Zr interlayer and compared the results with pure Zr interlayer and found that the thickness of the diffusion layer and shear strength increased remarkably in the former and subsequently the activation energy was also reduced. The processing temperature was significantly reduced with hydrogen addition.

    Almost all of the research is based on Ti alloy hydrogenated up to 0.4 wt% which produced similar results. Different materials can also be investigated as work piece and interlayer materials for utilizing the true potential of this technique.

    Electromagnetic welding (EMW) is a high speed, solid-state joining process practiced to join similar/dissimilar materials [90]. As this technique mainly employs electromagnetic forces to join materials its application is limited to conductive material only. Faraday's Law states that when a conductive material is loaded with a time-variant current it produces a magnetic field and induces a current in the neighboring conducting object, and Lenz's Law states that the current induced always opposes its origin and produces a magnetic field in the opposite direction [126]. Based on these two laws the principle of EMW is based. Lorenz force is generated by a repelling magnetic field due to the current which is used to accelerate one/both of the work pieces towards each other and produce a joint with strong metallurgical structure. This bonding is similar to explosive welding [127].

    In EMW, a high voltage source is required which charges the capacitor to a predetermined value and current flows through the primary coil, inducing a secondary current in the flyer plate. Owing to the current, a magnetic force is produced in the coil and flyer plate which accelerates it towards the target plate and colliding with it, thus, producing a bond at the interface of the two work pieces.

    Shanthala et al. [83] investigated the EMW of Al 6061 and SS304, which produced a strong weld without any intermetallic layers. The results of the Helium Leak Test indicated a tight weld between the two. Wang et al. [128] successfully produced robust welds of Al and Cu using EMW. Only a narrow area of the base metals was affected by the EMW in the vicinity of the joint and during the shear test the base material was fractured rather than the joint. The discharge voltage was directly proportional to the interfacial diffusion layer and mechanical interlocking. Li et al. [129] compared different current frequencies of EMW of Al and Cu keeping the discharge energy constant at 10 kJ. The frequencies investigated were 23.1, 17.8 and 15.2 kHz. The current frequency of 23.1 kHz had the shortest time from the deformation of the Al plate to the generation of the jet. With the current frequency of 17.8 kHz the length of the metallurgical bonding zone was the longest which produced the best welding effects. Chen et al. [90] studied the effect of discharge voltage on the weld joint interface of Al alloy and Mg alloy. It was found that the average thickness of the interface layer was exponentially increased from 2.1 to 26 µm as the voltage increased from 4 to 5 kV. The interfacial waves became more regular and smooth as the voltage increased. Kore et al. [86] optimized the process parameters in EMW of Al sheets and its effects were reported. The parameters studied were energy, standoff distance and coil geometry. Raoelison et al. [92] studied the effect of process parameters on the weld produced by EMW and concluded that the air gap had a more significant effect on the weld than the charging voltage. At the low gap, the required velocity was not reached which can damage the flyer and a large gap caused interfacial shearing and material tearing which fabricated brittle welds. Raoelison et al. [130] compared the weld joint of Al–Cu with Al–Al formed using EMW and observed intermetallic layer in the former and continuous metal bonding in the latter. The Al–Cu weld showed a brittle behavior whereas, the Al–Al welds showed a ductile one.

    Watanabe et al. [94] experimentally investigated the EMW of Al–metallic glass lap joints and fabricated sound weld with very little damage to the metallic glass. No change in chemical composition and micro hardness of the base material was observed in 2 µm area of the weld. This is due to the reason that in case of joining Al and metallic glass using electromagnetic welding it was observed that in the Al side the area of 2 µm and away had a constant hardness value similar to that of the base material. But the hardness value increased noticeably within the area of 2 μm from the interface because of the grain refinement and work hardening. Xu et al. [91] simulated and test the effect of impacted velocity on EMW of Al tubes. It was found that the impact velocity of the inner and outer tube increased with the increase in voltage. As the impact velocity was greater than 200 m/s, the joint strength was more than base Al strength and as it increased 355 m/s a regular waviness pattern was found at the joint transition region. Lueg-Althoff et al. [93] successfully joined thin-walled Al–Cu tubes employing EMW without using supporting inserts. Deformation in the parent material was found but the weld was achieved. It was also found that Polyurethane inserts significantly reduced the parent deformation and it can easily be removed afterwards. Yu et al. [131] experimentally investigate the EMW off Al–Carbon steel tubes with a pre-set angle and achieved reliable joints. It was found that micro hardness of the base material increased at the interface and the highest value existed in the transition zone.

    Most of the research is established on a very narrow range of material and that too with similar parameters. There is to need to check the viability of this process on different material shapes and sizes. Further research on the optimization of process parameters, material behavior and coil design will be beneficial.

    Ultrasonic welding (USW) is a non-consumable joining process used to weld similar/dissimilar materials with large melting point differenceand also large differences in mechanical properties. It can be employed to weld plastics and most of the metals. The USW setup is fundamentally an assembly of four components namely ultrasonic generator, transducer, booster and horn. The purpose of the ultrasonic generator is to increase the voltage and frequency of the electrical signal. The transducer converts the electrical signal into ultrasonic waves and vice-versa. Ultrasonic horn also referred to as tool holder, concentrator or sonotrode, it is integrated into the setup to enhance the amplitude of ultrasonic vibration. The material for the horn ranges from Al for ordinary applications and Ti for high-pressure complex applications. Booster is an optional constituent which installed between the transducer and the horn and is used to alter the amplitude of the horn [98]. The welding takes place due to two main forces, a mechanical force to the work piece and an oscillating force between the sonotrode and the work piece interface. The combination of these two forces deforms the work piece and welds them together.

    Shah et al. [132] compared the results of USW of AA6061 with conventional resistance spot welding (RSW) and found that higher mechanical strength, ductility, stiffness and energy absorbed before failure in former as compared to the latter. Owing to the ultrasonic vibrations the porosity defects were also significantly removed. Pati et al. [101] studied the effect of thickness of interlayer on USW of Al–SS joints using a zinc (Zn) interlayer and concluded that as the thickness increased, tensile shear strength increased to 0.11 mm after which it suddenly decreased. Mechanical properties of the composite materials can be evaluated by employing the finite element analysis [133,134,135,136,137,138]. Li et al. [100] experimentally investigated the effect of pressure on USW of Al–Cu and concluded that as the pressure increased the average vibrational amplitude decreased and thickness of the intermetallic compounds first increased then decreased. At a welding pressure of 1775 N cracking started at base material below the tip of the sonotrode. As the pressure increases brittle joints are found and ductile-brittle fracture under pressure ranges from 1375 to 2175 N. Shah et al. [139] compared the result of USW of TRIP780 Steel with RSW, the welds in the former showed higher joint strength with nugget pull-out failure whereas, the latter failed in interfacial debonding mode. HAZ was found to be wider in USW.

    Tsujino et al. [140] successfully fabricated butt welds of Al–SS and SS–SS using USW and found that the joint had the same strength as the base material and hardness of the base material increased due to ultrasonic vibrations. Tsujino et al. [103] successfully joined Al sheets of 0.3–1.0 mm thickness and quartz thin plates a semiconductor tips using complex vibrations USW. The bond strength was proportionally influenced by input energy per real contact area. Jeng et al. [99] investigated the effects of different parameters on the ultrasonic wire welding mechanism and concluded that the weldable range increases as the applied load or the power decreased. Kruger et al. [104] successfully joined PA12/E-Glass composite and AlMg3sheet using pure Al interlayer material without significant damage the fiber glass but strength was lower than ultrasonic metal welding technique. Wang et al. [141] successfully fabricated sound welds of Al/Ti alloys with Al interlayer using USW and found the micro hardness value gradually increased from Al to Ti side. The shear strength attained a maximum value with respect to the thickness of interlayer and remained constant as the thickness increased.

    Zhou et al. [102] experimentally investigated the effect of welding time of USW of 1.5 mm thick AA6061 and 1 mm thick commercially pure Ti. It was concluded that welding time affects appearance, microstructure, thermal cycle and mechanical properties. No significant interface layers were generated or intermetallic compounds were created. As the welding time increased the peak temperature achieved a maximum value then constant at 365.6 ºС. The failure occurred due to failure of the interface. Kumar et al. [142] investigated the USW GF/PA6T composite of fabricated weld having high strength. It was found that as the welding time increased the void formation gradually decreased which helped produced stronger welds.

    USW has a wide range of benefit from mechanical properties, surface quality, and uniform grain growth to reducing the overall cost of the product. But there is still a need to study ductile materials such as Ti, Ni alloys and effects all the parameters, optimizing them, morphology study of weld joints and USW of hard and complex materials.

    The unique points of the present study are summarized as follows:

    ●   Most of the work which has already been published focuses on a single joining technique and based on earlier research developments. In this review paper, the emphasis has been given to the latest research work on lightweight materials which cannot be joined using traditional joining techniques.

    ●   This review paper aims to provide a brief understanding of the advanced joining processes namely friction stir welding, microwave hybrid heating, electron beam welding, laser beam welding, thermo-hydrogenated diffusion bonding, electromagnetic welding and ultrasonic welding.

    ●   Difficulties of joining of alloys of titanium, aluminum, copper, nickel, etc. has been discussed providing a scope these advance joining techniques has been established.

    ●   Research gaps for the techniques have been discussed individually such as optimizing the parameters, developing mathematical relations between parameter and work piece, investigating different weld configuration other than butt and lap joint and studying the effect of different pre/post-weld treatment of the work piece to increase the joint strength and prevent failure.

    Throughout history, we have seen the rising need for high strength, lightweight, corrosion resistance and economical materials. Materials were developed, are developing and will be evolved according to our needs. Properties of alloys of titanium, aluminum, copper, nickel, stainless steel and other materials were enhanced to fulfill our desire. Smaller components of these alloys can be manufactured using techniques like additive manufacturing and selective laser melting, but for producing larger components these smaller parts need to be joined together but the traditional joining techniques are not found to be fruitful. Advanced joining techniques like friction stir welding, microwave hybrid heating, electron beam welding, laser beam welding, thermo-hydrogenated diffusion bonding, electromagnetic welding and ultra sonic welding were developed to join together these materials. Though these techniques are found to be beneficial in many cases most of the research was conducted on a narrow range of materials and that too on identical parameters. There is a need to utilize the true potential of these techniques by further exploration and generalizing them, optimizing the parameters, developing mathematical relations between parameter and work piece, investigating different weld configuration other than butt and lap joint and studying the effect of different pre/post-weld treatment of the work piece to increase the joint strength and prevent failure.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Zhang J, Li X, Xu D, et al. (2019) Recent progress in the simulation of microstructure evolution in titanium alloys. Prog Nat Sci 29: 295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2019.05.006
    [2] Kaur M, Singh K (2019) Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. Mat Sci Eng C-Bio S 102: 844–862. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064
    [3] Koizumi H, Takeuchi Y, Imai H, et al. (2019) Application of titanium and titanium alloys to fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont Res 63: 266–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.011
    [4] Huang Y, Wang J, Wan L, et al. (2016) Self-riveting friction stir lap welding of aluminum alloy to steel. Mater Lett 185: 181–184. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.102
    [5] Zhang J, Song B, Wei Q, et al. (2019) A review of selective laser melting of aluminum alloys: Processing, microstructure, property and developing trends. J Mater Sci Technol 35: 270–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.004
    [6] Choudhury B, Chandrasekaran M (2017) Investigation on welding characteristics of aerospace materials—A review. Mater Today Proc 4: 7519–7526. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.083
    [7] Ebrahimi M, Par MA (2019) Twenty-year uninterrupted endeavor of friction stir processing by focusing on copper and its alloys. J Alloy Compd 781: 1074–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.083
    [8] Soffa WA, Laughlin DE (2004) High-strength age hardening copper-titanium alloys: redivivus. Prog Mater Sci 49: 347–366. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(03)00029-X
    [9] Alaneme KK, Okotete EA (2016) Reconciling viability and cost-effective shape memory alloy options—A review of copper and iron based shape memory metallic systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19: 1582–1592.
    [10] Dundu M (2018) Evolution of stress–strain models of stainless steel in structural engineering applications. Constr Build Mater 165: 413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.008
    [11] Gardner L (2019) Stability and design of stainless steel structures—Review and outlook. Thin-Walled Struct 141: 208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.019
    [12] Corradi M, Di Schino A, Borri A, et al. (2018) A review of the use of stainless steel for masonry repair and reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 181: 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.034
    [13] Anderson DL (1989) Theory of the Earth, Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    [14] Revie RW (2011) Uhlig's Corrosion Handbook, 4 Eds., New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    [15] Boyer RR (1996) An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 213: 103–114. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-1
    [16] Jaffee RI, Promisel NE (1970) Science, Technology and Application of Titanium. Proceedings of an International Conference Held at London, 1 Ed., United Kingdom: Elsevier.
    [17] Pitchi CS, Priyadarshini A, Sana G, et al. (2020) A review on alloy composition and synthesis of β-Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Today Proc 26: 3297–3304. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.468
    [18] Kumar AS, Rao TVH, Rao VVSK, et al. (2019) Optimizing pulsed current micro plasma arc welding parameters to maximize ultimate tensile strength of titanium (Ti–6Al–4V) alloy using Dragon fly algorithm. Mater Today Proc 27: 2086–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.073
    [19] Xiong J, Li S, Gao F, et al. (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti6321 alloy welded joint by GTAW. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 640: 419–423. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.022
    [20] Baeslack WA, Becker DW, Froes FH (1984) Advances in titanium alloy welding metallurgy. JOM 36: 46–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03338455
    [21] Dhinakaran V, Shriragav SV, Fathima AFY, et al. (2020) A review on the categorization of the welding process of pure titanium and its characterization. Mater Today Proc 27: 742–747. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.034
    [22] Heinz A, Haszler A, Keidel C, et al. (2000) Recent development in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 280: 102–107. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00674-7
    [23] Mohammadi J, Behnamian Y, Mostafaei A, et al. (2015) Friction stir welding joint of dissimilar materials between AZ31B magnesium and 6061 aluminum alloys: Microstructure studies and mechanical characterizations. Mater Charact 101: 189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.01.008
    [24] Vasanthakumar P, Sekar K, Venkatesh K (2019) Recent developments in powder metallurgy based aluminium alloy composite for aerospace applications. Mater Today Proc 18: 5400–5409. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.568
    [25] Jian Z, Zhong-yu P, Shi-ying L, et al. (2019) Investigation of wear behavior of graphite coating on aluminum piston skirt of automobile engine. Eng Fail Anal 97: 408–415. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.012
    [26] Gupta S, Singh D, Yadav A, et al. (2020) A comparative study of 5083 aluminium alloy and 316L stainless steel for shipbuilding material. Mater Today Proc 28: 2358–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.641
    [27] Cagan SC, Venkatesh B, Buldum BB (2020) Investigation of surface roughness and chip morphology of aluminum alloy in dry and minimum quantity lubrication machining. Mater Today Proc 27: 1122–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.547
    [28] Kim D, Lee W, Kim J, et al. (2010) Formability evaluation of friction stir welded 6111-T4 sheet with respect to joining material direction. Int J Mech Sci 52: 612–625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.01.001
    [29] Davis JR (1994) Stainless steels, Asm Specialty Handbook, 1 Ed., Almere: ASM international.
    [30] Hyun PJ, Kwon HS (2008) Development of high Mn–N duplex stainless steel for automobile structural components. Corros Sci 50: 404–410. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.07.004
    [31] Baddoo NR (2008) Stainless steel in construction: A review of research, applications, challenges and opportunities. J Constr Steel Res 64: 1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.07.011
    [32] Mohan S, Nair SS, Ajay AV, et al. (2019) Corrosion behaviour of ZrO2–TiO2nano composite coating on stainless steel under simulated marine environment. Mater Today Proc 27: 2492–2497. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.224
    [33] Nguyen Q, Azadkhou A, Akbari M, et al. (2020) Experimental investigation of temperature field and fusion zone microstructure in dissimilar pulsed laser welding of austenitic stainless steel and copper. J Manuf Process 56: 206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.03.037
    [34] Patel V, Sali A, Hyder J, et al. (2020) Electron beam welding of inconel 718. Procedia Manuf 48: 428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.065
    [35] Niesłony P, Grzesik W, Jarosz K, et al. (2018) FEM-based optimization of machining operations of aerospace parts made of Inconel 718 superalloy. Procedia CIRP 77: 570–573. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.220
    [36] Akca E, Gürsel A (2015) A review on superalloysand IN718 nickel-based INCONEL superalloy. Period Eng Nat Sci 3: 15–27.
    [37] Rahman MS, Polychronopoulou K, Polycarpou AA (2019) Tribochemistry of inconel 617 during sliding contact at 950 º С under helium environment for nuclear reactors. J Nucl Mater 521: 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.032
    [38] Periane S, Duchosal A, Vaudreuil S, et al. (2019) Machining influence on the fatigue resistance of Inconel 718 fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Procedia StructIntegr 19: 415–422.
    [39] Ahmed MMZ, Seleman MME-S, Zidan ZA, et al. (2021) Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded AA2024-T4/AA7075-T6 t–butt joints. Metals 11: 1–19.
    [40] Costa AMS, Oliveira JP, Pereira VF, et al. (2018) Ni-based Mar-M247 superalloy as a friction stir processing tool. J Mater Process Tech 262: 605–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.034
    [41] Singh VP, Patel SK, Ranjan A, et al. (2020) Recent research progress in solid state friction-stir welding of aluminium–magnesium alloys: A critical review. J Mater Res Technol 9: 6217–6256. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.008
    [42] Costa M, Rojas R, Mira-Aguiar T, et al. (2015) A comparative techno–economic evaluation of friction stir welding versus resistance seam welding, FSWP 2015 International Conference, 1–3.
    [43] Shah PH, Badheka VJ (2016) An experimental insight on the selection of the tool tilt angle for friction stir welding of 7075 T651 aluminum alloys. Indian J Sci Technol 9: 1–11. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i47/105273
    [44] Malopheyev S, Vysotskiy I, Kulitskiy V, et al. (2016) Optimization of processing-microstructure-properties relationship in friction-stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 662: 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.063
    [45] Sun SJ, Kim JS, Lee WG, et al. (2017) Influence of friction stir welding on mechanical properties of butt joints of AZ61 magnesium alloy. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2017: 1–13.
    [46] Sato YS, Arkom P, Kokawa H, et al. (2008) Effect of microstructure on properties of friction stir welded Inconel Alloy 600. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 477: 250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.002
    [47] Song KH, Nakata K (2010) Effect of precipitation on post-heat-treated Inconel 625 alloy after friction stir welding. Mater Des 31: 2942–2947. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.020
    [48] Gamit D, Mishra RR, Sharma AK (2017) Joining of mild steel pipes using microwave hybrid heating at 2.45 GHz and joint characterization. J Manuf Process 27: 158–168.
    [49] Sharma A, Sehgal S, Goyal D (2020) Effects of process parameters in joining of Inconel-625 alloy through microwave hybrid heating. Mater Today Proc 28: 1323–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.590
    [50] Bagha L, Sehgal S, Thakur A, et al. (2017) Effects of powder size of interface material on selective hybrid carbon microwave joining of SS304–SS304. J Manuf Process 25: 290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.12.013
    [51] Badiger RI, Narendranath S, Srinath MS (2018) Optimization of parameters influencing tensile strength of inconel-625 welded joints developed through microwave hybrid heating. Mater Today Proc 5: 7659–7667. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.441
    [52] Pal M, Sehgal S, Kumar H (2020) Optimization of elemental weight % in microwave processed joints of SS304/SS316 using Taguchi philosophy. J Adv Manuf Syst 19: 543–565. doi: 10.1142/S0219686720500262
    [53] Samyal R, Bagha AK, Bedi R (2019) An experimental study to predict the exposure time for microwave based joining of different grades of stainless steel material. Mater Today Proc 27: 2449–2454. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.217
    [54] Kumar V, Sehgal S (2020) Joining of duplex stainless steel through selective microwave hybrid heating technique without using filler material. Mater Today Proc28: 1314–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.509
    [55] Gupta P, Kumar S, Kumar A (2013) Study of joint formed by tungsten carbide bearing alloy through microwave welding. Mater Manuf Process 28: 601–604. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2013.763966
    [56] Singh S, Suri NM, Belokar RM (2015) Characterization of joint developed by fusion of aluminum metal powder through microwave hybrid heating. Mater Today Proc 2: 1340–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.052
    [57] Richards NL, Nakkalil R, Chaturvedi MC (1994) The influence of electron-beam welding parameters on heat-affected-zone microfissuring in INCOLOY 903. Metall Mater Trans A 25: 1733–1745. doi: 10.1007/BF02668538
    [58] Zhang BG, Zhao J, Li XP, et al. (2014) Electron beam welding of 304 stainless steel to QCr0.8 copper alloy with copper filler wire. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24: 4059–4066.
    [59] Derakhshi MA, Kangazian J, Shamanian M (2019) Electron beam welding of inconel 617 to AISI 310: Corrosion behavior of weld metal. Vacuum 161: 371–374. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.01.005
    [60] Iltaf A, Junaid M, khan FN, et al. (2020) Microstructure, mechanical properties, residual stresses and texture analysis of Ti–5Al–2.5Sn alloy weldments obtained using electron beam of different oscillation patterns. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec234: 3484–3496.
    [61] Dinda SK, BasiruddinSk M, Roy GG, et al. (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of electron beam welded dissimilar steel to Fe–Al alloy joints. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 677: 182–192. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.050
    [62] Guo S, Peng Y, Cui C, et al. (2019) Forming and tensile fracture characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V and T2 Cu vacuum electron beam welded joints. Vacuum 165: 311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.04.018
    [63] Singh J, Shahi AS (2019) Metallurgical, impact and fatigue performance of electron beam welded duplex stainless steel joints. J Mater Process Tech 272: 137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.05.010
    [64] Gao P, Zhang KF, Zhang BG, et al. (2011) Microstructures and high temperature mechanical properties of electron beam welded Inconel 718 superalloy thick plate. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 21: s315–s322. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61598-7
    [65] Sharma SK, Agarwal P, Majumdar JD (2017) Studies on electron beam welded Inconel 718 similar joints. Procedia Manuf 7: 654–659. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.097
    [66] Zhao L, Wang S, Jin Y, et al. (2018) Microstructural characterization and mechanical performance of Al–Cu–Li alloy electron beam welded joint. Aerosp Sci Technol 82: 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.030
    [67] Oliveira JP, Zeng Z, Omori T, et al. (2016) Improvement of damping properties in laser processed superelastic Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloys. Mater Design 98: 280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.032
    [68] Oliveira JP, Schell N, Zhou N, et al. (2019) Laser welding of precipitation strengthened Ni-rich NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloys: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Design 162: 229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.053
    [69] Zeng Z, Oliveira JP, Yang M, et al. (2017) Functional fatigue behavior of NiTi–Cu dissimilar laser welds. Mater Design 114: 282–287. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.023
    [70] Noh FS, Zin HM, Alnasser K, et al. (2017) Optimization of laser lap joining between stainless steel 304 and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS). Procedia Eng 184: 246–250. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.092
    [71] Bideskan AS, Ebrahimzadeh P, Teimouri R (2020) Fabrication of bi-layer PMMA and aluminum 6061-T6 laminates by laser transmission welding: Performance prediction and optimization. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 3: 150–159.
    [72] Liu FC, Dong P, Pei X (2020) A high-speed metal-to-polymer direct joining technique and underlying bonding mechanisms. J Mater Process Tech 280: 116610. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116610
    [73] Hao K, Liao W, Zhang T, et al. (2020) Interface formation and bonding mechanisms of laser transmission welded composite structure of PET on austenitic steel via beam oscillation. Compos Struct 235: 111752. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111752
    [74] Li S, Mi G, Wang C (2020) A study on laser beam oscillating welding characteristics for the 5083 aluminum alloy: Morphology, microstructure and mechanical properties. J Manuf Process 53: 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.018
    [75] Mehrpouya M, Gisario A, Elahinia M (2018) Laser welding of NiTi shape memory alloy: A review. J Manuf Process 31: 162–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.011
    [76] Katayama S, Kawahito Y (2008) Laser direct joining of metal and plastic. Scripta Mater 59: 1247–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.026
    [77] Zhang LX, Chang Q, Sun Z, et al. (2019) Diffusion bonding of hydrogenated TC4 alloy and GH3128 superalloy using composite interlayers. J Mater Process Tech 274: 116266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116266
    [78] Zhu F, Peng H, Li X, et al. (2018) Dissimilar diffusion bonding behavior of hydrogenated Ti2AlNb-based and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. Mater Des 159: 68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.034
    [79] Wang Z, Li C, Qi J, et al. (2019) Characterization of hydrogenated niobium interlayer and its application in TiAl/Ti2AlNb diffusion bonding. Int J Hydrogen Energ 44: 6929–6937. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.133
    [80] Feng JC, Liu H, He P, et al. (2007) Effects of hydrogen on diffusion bonding of hydrogenated Ti6Al4V alloy containing 0.3 wt% hydrogen at fast heating rate. Int J Hydrogen Energ 32: 3054–3058.
    [81] Wu H, Peng H, Li X, et al. (2019) Effect of hydrogen addition on diffusion bonding behavior of Ti-55 alloy. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 739: 244–253. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.032
    [82] He P, Wang J, Lin T, et al. (2014) Effect of hydrogen on diffusion bonding of TiAl-based intermetallics and Ni-based superalloy using hydrogenated Ti6Al4V interlayer. Int J Hydrogen Energ 39: 1882–1887. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.035
    [83] Shanthala K, Sreenivasa TN (2017) Non-conventional solid state joining of structural materials. Int J Res Eng Technol 6: 46–48.
    [84] He P, Fan L, Liu H, et al. (2010) Effects of hydrogen on diffusion bonding of TiAl-based intermetallics using hydrogenated Ti6Al4V interlayer. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35: 13317–13321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.040
    [85] Wang D, Cao J, Li W, et al. (2017) Zr hydrogenation by cathodic charging and its application in TC4 alloy diffusion bonding. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42: 6350–6359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.170
    [86] Kore SD, Date PP, Kulkarni SV (2007) Effect of process parameters on electromagnetic impact welding of aluminum sheets. Int J Impact Eng 34: 1327–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.006
    [87] Pereira D, Oliveira JP, Pardal T, et al. (2018) Magnetic pulse welding: machine optimisation for aluminium tubular joints production. Sci Technol Weld Joi 23: 172–179. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2017.1355425
    [88] Pereira D, Oliveira JP, Santos TG, et al. (2019) Aluminium to carbon fibre reinforced polymer tubes joints produced by magnetic pulse welding. Compos Struct 230: 111512. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111512
    [89] Wang YT, Cheng YH, Lin CC, et al. (2020) Direct bonding of aluminum to alumina using a nickel interlayer for power electronics applications. Results Mater 6: 100093. doi: 10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100093
    [90] Chen S, Jiang X (2015) Microstructure evolution during magnetic pulse welding of dissimilar aluminium and magnesium alloys. J Manuf Process 19: 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.04.001
    [91] Xu Z, Cui J, Yu H, et al. (2013) Research on the impact velocity of magnetic impulse welding of pipe fitting. Mater Des 49: 736–745. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.059
    [92] Raoelison RN, Buiron N, Rachik M, et al. (2012) Efficient welding conditions in magnetic pulse welding process. J Manuf Process 14: 372–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.04.001
    [93] Lueg-Althoff J, Bellmann J, Hahn M, et al. (2020) Joining dissimilar thin-walled tubes by Magnetic Pulse Welding. J Mater Process Tech 279: 116562. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116562
    [94] Watanabe M, Kumai S, Hagimoto G, et al. (2009) Interfacial microstructure of aluminum/metallic glass lap joints fabricated by magnetic pulse welding. Mater Trans 50: 1279–1285. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.ME200835
    [95] Zhang W, Ao S, Oliveira JP, et al. (2018) Microstructural characterization and mechanical behavior ofNiTishape memory alloys ultrasonic joints using Cu interlayer. Materials 11: 1–14.
    [96] Zhang W, Ao S, Oliveira JP, et al. (2020) On the metallurgical joining mechanism during ultrasonic spot welding of NiTi using a Cu interlayer. Scripta Mater 178: 414–417. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.012
    [97] Zhang W, Ao SS, Oliveira JP, et al. (2018) Effect of ultrasonic spot welding on the mechanical behaviour of NiTi shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 27: 85020. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aacfeb
    [98] Neppiras EA (1965) Ultrasonic welding of metals. Ultrasonics 3: 128–135. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(65)80003-8
    [99] Jeng YR, Horng JH (2001) Amicrocontact approach for ultrasonic wire bonding in microelectronics. J Tribol 123: 725–731. doi: 10.1115/1.1352744
    [100] Li H, Cao B (2019) Effects of welding pressure on high-power ultrasonic spot welding of Cu/Al dissimilar metals. J Manuf Process 46: 194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.018
    [101] Pati PR, Satpathy MP, Nanda BK, et al. (2020) Dissimilar joining of Al/SS sheets with interlayers by ultrasonic spot Welding: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Today Proc 26: 1757–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.369
    [102] Zhou L, Min J, He WX, et al. (2018) Effect of welding time on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Ti ultrasonic spot welds. J Manuf Process 33: 64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.04.013
    [103] Tsujino J, Sano T, Ogata H, et al. (2002) Complex vibration ultrasonic welding systems with large area welding tips. Ultrasonics 40: 361–364. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00122-1
    [104] Krüger S, Wagner G, Eifler D (2004) Ultrasonic welding of metal/composite joints. Adv Eng Mater 6: 157–159. doi: 10.1002/adem.200300539
    [105] Thomas M, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, et al. (1991) Improvements relating to friction welding. PL Patent 615480 B1.
    [106] Hou W, Ahmad Shah LH, Huang G, et al. (2020) The role of tool offset on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Cu friction stir welded joints. J Alloy Compd 825: 154045. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154045
    [107] Hasan MM, Ishak M, Rejab MRM (2017) Influence of machine variables and tool profile on the tensile strength of dissimilar AA7075–AA6061 friction stir welds. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 90: 2605–2615. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9583-3
    [108] Aali M (2020) Investigation of spindle rotation rate effects on the mechanical behavior of friction stir welded Ti4Al2V alloy. J Weld Join 38: 81–91. doi: 10.5781/JWJ.2020.38.1.9
    [109] Li D, Yang X, Cui L, et al. (2015) Fatigue property of stationary shoulder friction stir welded additive and non-additive T joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 20: 650–654. doi: 10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000045
    [110] Bagha L, Shegal S, Thakur A (2016) Comparative analysis of microwave based joining/welding of SS304–SS304 using different interfacing materials. MATEC Web Conf 57: 03001. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20165703001
    [111] Pal M, Sehgal S, Kumar H, et al. (2020) Use of nickel filler powder in joining SS304–SS316 through microwave hybrid heating technique. Met Powder Rep In press.
    [112] Bagha L, Sehgal S, Thakur A, et al. (2019) Low cost joining of SS304–SS304 through microwave hybrid heating without filler-powder. Mater Res Express 1: 25035.
    [113] Srinath M, Murthy P, Sharma A, et al. (2012) Simulation and analysis of microwave heating while joining bulk copper. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4: 152–158.
    [114] Bhoi NK, Singh H, Pratap S (2019) A study on microwave susceptor material for hybrid heating. J Phys Conf Ser 1240: 012097 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012097
    [115] Lingappa SM, Srinath MS, Amarendra HJ (2017) An experimental investigation to find the critical (coupling) temperature in microwave hybrid heating of bulk metallic materials. Mater Res Express 4: 106521. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa931e
    [116] Norrish J (2006) Advanced Welding Processes, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
    [117] Cary HB, Helzer SC (2004) Modern Welding Technology, 5Eds., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    [118] Oliveira JP, Duarte JF, Inácio P, et al. (2017) Production of Al/NiTi composites by friction stir welding assisted by electrical current. Mater Design 113: 311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.038
    [119] Al-Sayyad A, Bardon J, Hirchenhahn P, et al. (2018) Aluminum pretreatment by a laser ablation process: Influence of processing parameters on the joint strength of laser welded aluminum–polyamide assemblies. Procedia CIRP 74: 495–499. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.136
    [120] Amend P, Pfindel S, Schmidt M (2013) Thermal joining of thermoplastic metal hybrids by means of mono- and polychromatic radiation. Phys Procedia 41: 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.056
    [121] Chen YJ, Yue TM, Guo ZN (2016) A new laser joining technology for direct-bonding of metals and plastics. Mater Des 110: 775–781. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.018
    [122] Xiao R, Zhang X (2014) Problems and issues in laser beam welding of aluminum–lithium alloys. J Manuf Process 16: 166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.005
    [123] Elrefaey A, Tillmann W (2009) Solid state diffusion bonding of titanium to steel using a copper base alloy as interlayer. J Mater Process Tech 209: 2746–2752. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.014
    [124] Ma Y, Li H, Yang L, et al. (2018) Reaction-assisted diffusion bonding of Ti6Al4V alloys with Ti/Ni nanostructured multilayers. J Mater Process Tech 262: 204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.05.035
    [125] Deng Y, Sheng G, Xu C (2013) Evaluation of the microstructure and mechanical properties of diffusion bonded joints of titanium to stainless steel with a pure silver interlayer. Mater Des 46: 84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.058
    [126] Sadiku MNO (2001) Elements of Electromagnetics, 6 Eds., New York: Oxford University Press.
    [127] Jiang S, Shen J, Nagasaka T, et al. (2020) Interfacial characterization of dissimilar-metals bonding between vanadium alloy and Hastelloy X alloy by explosive welding. J Nucl Mater 539: 152322. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152322
    [128] Wang PQ, Chen DL, Ran Y, et al. (2020) Electromagnetic pulse welding of Al/Cu dissimilar materials: Microstructure and tensile properties. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 792: 139842. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139842
    [129] Li C, Zhou Y, Wang X, et al. (2020) Influence of discharge current frequency on electromagnetic pulse welding. J Manuf Process 57: 509–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.038
    [130] Raoelison RN, Racine D, Zhang Z, et al. (2014) Magnetic pulse welding: Interface of Al/Cu joint and investigation of intermetallic formation effect on the weld features. J Manuf Process 16: 427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.05.002
    [131] Yu HP, Xu ZD, Jiang HW, et al. (2012) Magnetic pulse joining of aluminum alloy–carbon steel tubes. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22: s548–s552.
    [132] Shah U, Liu X (2020) Effect of ultrasonic energy on the spot weldability of aluminum alloy AA6061. Mater Des 192: 108690. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108690
    [133] Bahl S, Bagha AK (2020) Finite element modeling and simulation of the fiber–matrix interface in fiber reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc In press.
    [134] Bagha AK, Bahl S (2020) Finite element analysis of VGCF/pp reinforced square representative volume element to predict its mechanical properties for different loadings. Mater Today Proc In press.
    [135] Bahl S (2020) Axisymmetric finite element analysis of single fiber push-out test for stainless steel wire reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 28: 1605–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.848
    [136] Bahl S (2020) Fiber reinforced metal matrix composites—a review. Mater Today Proc In press.
    [137] Saini MK, Bagha AK, Kumar S, et al. (2020) Finite element analysis for predicting the vibration characteristics of natural fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Today Proc In press.
    [138] Bagha AK, Bahl S (2020) Strain energy and finite element analysis to predict the mechanical properties of vapor grown carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene nanocomposites. Mater Today Proc In press.
    [139] Shah UH, Liu X (2019) Ultrasonic resistance welding of TRIP-780 steel. J Mater Process Tech 274: 116287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116287
    [140] Tsujino J, Hidai K, Hasegawa A, et al. (2002) Ultrasonic butt welding of aluminum, aluminum alloy and stainless steel plate specimens. Ultrasonics 40: 371–374. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00124-5
    [141] Wang SQ, Patel VK, Bhole SD, et al. (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrasonic spot welded Al/Ti alloy joints. Mater Des 78: 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.023
    [142] Kalyan RK, Omkumar M (2020) Investigation and characterization of ultrasonically welded GF/PA6T composites. Mater Today Proc 26: 282–286. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.261
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yao Qiao, Daniel R. Merkel, Ethan K. Nickerson, Yongsoon Shin, Robert J. Seffens, Angel Ortiz, Kevin L. Simmons, Mode I tensile fracture behavior of adhesively-bonded metal–metal, metal–CFRP, and CFRP–CFRP bi-material combinations analyzed by size effect method, 2022, 160, 1359835X, 107025, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107025
    2. Sipokazi Mabuwa, Velaphi Msomi, Husain Mehdi, Kuldeep Kumar Saxena, Effect of material positioning on Si-rich TIG welded joints of AA6082 and AA8011 by friction stir processing, 2022, 0169-4243, 1, 10.1080/01694243.2022.2142366
    3. Jian Wang, Huiming Ding, Junxia Jiang, Yunbo Bi, A calculation method for the mode II fracture energy release rate of dissimilar materials adhesively bonded structures, 2023, 8756-758X, 10.1111/ffe.13953
    4. Reza Motallebi, Zeinab Savaedi, Hamed Mirzadeh, Post-processing heat treatment of lightweight magnesium alloys fabricated by additive manufacturing: a review, 2022, 20, 22387854, 1873, 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.154
    5. Ali Yürük, The Effect of Different Friction Pressure on the Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Ti Gr2 Titanium Alloy, 2023, 1059-9495, 10.1007/s11665-023-07974-7
    6. Abhishek Sharma, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Shashi Bahl, Finite element model updating of metallic and composite structures-A state of the art review, 2021, 8, 2372-0484, 390, 10.3934/matersci.2021025
    7. Aytekin Ulutaş, 2022, chapter 6, 9781799878643, 121, 10.4018/978-1-7998-7864-3.ch006
    8. Abhishek Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, Devaki Nandan, 2022, Chapter 18, 978-981-16-5370-4, 197, 10.1007/978-981-16-5371-1_18
    9. Sayed Suhaib Kamran, Abid Haleem, Shashi Bahl, Mohd Javaid, Chander Prakash, Dharam Budhhi, Artificial intelligence and advanced materials in automotive industry: Potential applications and perspectives, 2022, 62, 22147853, 4207, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.727
    10. Vadym Shalomeev, Galyna Tabunshchyk, Viktor Greshta, Kinga Korniejenko, Martin Duarte Guigou, Sławomir Parzych, Casting Welding from Magnesium Alloy Using Filler Materials That Contain Scandium, 2022, 15, 1996-1944, 4213, 10.3390/ma15124213
    11. Abhishek Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, 2022, 9781119750314, 253, 10.1002/9781119755074.ch21
    12. Kartikay Singh Pawar, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, Devaki Nandan, 2022, Chapter 17, 978-981-16-8340-4, 211, 10.1007/978-981-16-8341-1_17
    13. Adarsh Kumar Yadav, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, Rakesh Chandmal Sharma, 2022, Chapter 69, 978-981-19-0243-7, 733, 10.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_69
    14. Fei-Peng An, Qian-Li Liu, Peng Jiang, Effect of microstructure on low-cycle fatigue property of Ti6321 alloy, 2021, 8, 2053-1591, 096517, 10.1088/2053-1591/ac2426
    15. Nitin Gupta, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, 2022, 9781119750314, 239, 10.1002/9781119755074.ch20
    16. Nitin Gupta, Ashok Kumar Bagha, Shashi Bahl, 2023, Chapter 18, 978-981-19-2187-2, 189, 10.1007/978-981-19-2188-9_18
    17. Guangyong Sun, Dongdong Chen, Guohua Zhu, Qing Li, Lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: A state-of-the-art review and outlook, 2022, 172, 02638231, 108760, 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108760
    18. Hanwei Ning, Dongjun Wang, Jie Zhao, Bao Wang, Gang Liu, Fabrication and joining of NiAl and TiAl intermetallics by additive sintering, 2022, 849, 09215093, 143493, 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143493
    19. Andrey V. Chernov, Ilias K. Savvas, Alexander A. Alexandrov, Oleg O. Kartashov, Dmitry S. Polyanichenko, Maria A. Butakova, Alexander V. Soldatov, Integrated Video and Acoustic Emission Data Fusion for Intelligent Decision Making in Material Surface Inspection System, 2022, 22, 1424-8220, 8554, 10.3390/s22218554
    20. Virinder Kumar, Shankar Sehgal, Development and characterisation of microwave processed SS2205 joints, 2022, 8, 2374-068X, 456, 10.1080/2374068X.2021.1939552
    21. M. L. Busurina, A. E. Sytschev, O. D. Boyarchenko, Combustion-synthesised TiAl/NiAl layered intermetallic composite: synthesis, phase composition, and microstructure, 2024, 2374-068X, 1, 10.1080/2374068X.2024.2307085
    22. Ishtiaque Karim Robin, Tim Gräning, Ying Yang, Syeda Bushra Haider, Eric Andrew Lass, Yutai Katoh, Steven John Zinkle, Evaluation of Tungsten—Steel Solid-State Bonding: Options and the Role of CALPHAD to Screen Diffusion Bonding Interlayers, 2023, 13, 2075-4701, 1438, 10.3390/met13081438
    23. Jian Wang, Huiming Ding, Junxia Jiang, Yunbo Bi, Experimental and numerical investigation on test methods for mode II fracture of composite‐titanium adhesively bonded structures, 2023, 46, 8756-758X, 3766, 10.1111/ffe.14104
    24. Jia Liu, Mingfei Huang, Shanshan Li, Jinfeng Chen, 2023, Chapter 121, 978-981-99-2091-4, 951, 10.1007/978-981-99-2092-1_121
    25. Zeshan Abbas, Lun Zhao, Jianxiong Deng, Shicheng Wang, Wanlu Hong, Advances in ultrasonic welding of lightweight alloys: A review, 2023, 42, 2191-0324, 10.1515/htmp-2022-0298
    26. Tarunpreet Singh, Shankar Sehgal, A systematic review on the microwave joining of metallic material through hybrid heating technique, 2024, 0954-4089, 10.1177/09544089241296595
    27. Tarunpreet Singh, Shankar Sehgal, Thermal modeling and simulation applied to novel microwave hybrid heating process, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 095536, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6d06
    28. Bhiksha Gugulothu, Srikanth Karumuri, S. Vijayakumar, B. Muthuvel, Suresh Seetharaman, S. Jeyakrishnan, Kuldeep K. Saxena, Optimization of TIG welding process parameters on chrome alloy steel using Box–Behnken method, 2024, 18, 1955-2513, 6725, 10.1007/s12008-023-01531-1
    29. Olatunji Oladimeji Ojo, Emmanuel Olatunji Olutomilola, Anthony Yinka Oyerinde, Agnes Funmilayo Afolabi, Taiwo Ebenezer Abioye, Isiaka Oluwole Oladele, Kenneth Kanayo Alaneme, Advancements in microwave welding: Susceptor-assisted microwave hybrid-heating technique for metals and polymers, 2025, 43, 23524928, 111653, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111653
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5614) PDF downloads(579) Cited by(29)

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog