Research article

The effect of temperature and volume fraction of mahoni (Swietenia mahogani) wood charcoal on SS400 steel using pack carburizing method: Study of hardness and microstructure characteristics

  • Surface hardening process is one of the final steps to improve the product quality especially in toughness of the steel core. In this study, the SS400 steel was investigated as the potential steel core to be used as a sprocket. However, this material is categorized in low hardness due to its low carbon content. Improving SS400 steel by using surface hardening was carried out by pack carburizing with Mahoni Wood Charcoal (MWC) powder as carburizing. The volume fraction of MWC was varied at 60, 70, and 80% with ratio mixing of BaCO3 activator for 40, 30 and 20%, respectively. The pack carburizing process was conducted at 850 and 900 ℃ with holding time for 1 h followed by quenching. The hardness test showed that the highest hardness value was 677.4 HV at variation of 60% MWC + 40% BaCO3 on 900 ℃ (holding time 1 h). This hardness value number of the sample (60% MWC + 40% BaCO3 on 900 ℃) was higher than raw materials for 452% of raw material. The microstructures also display a martensite structure in this sample.

    Citation: Mochamad Asrofi, Mochammad Agus Vian Hidayatulloh, Gaguk Jatisukamto, Hary Sutjahjono, Rahma Rei Sakura. The effect of temperature and volume fraction of mahoni (Swietenia mahogani) wood charcoal on SS400 steel using pack carburizing method: Study of hardness and microstructure characteristics[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(3): 354-363. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.3.354

    Related Papers:

    [1] Pavan Hiremath, Gowrishankar M. C., Manjunath Shettar, Sathyashankara Sharma, Jayashree P. K., Suhas Kowshik . Influence of normalizing post carburizing treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of low alloy gear steels. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 836-851. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021051
    [2] Mica Grujicic, Jennifer Snipes, S. Ramaswami . Meso-scale computational investigation of polyurea microstructure and its role in shockwave attenuation/dispersion. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(3): 163-188. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.3.163
    [3] ME Makhatha . Effect of titanium addition on sub-structural characteristics of low carbon copper bearing steel in hot rolling. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 604-616. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022036
    [4] Jiřina Vontorová, Petra Váňová . Determination of carburized layer thickness by GDOES method. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(1): 34-43. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.1.34
    [5] Bauyrzhan Rakhadilov, Rinat Kussainov, Aisulu Kalitova, Zarina Satbayeva, Aibek Shynarbek . The impact of technological parameters of electrolytic-plasma treatment on the changes in the mechano-tribological properties of steel 45. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(4): 666-683. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024034
    [6] Marek Konieczny . Mechanical properties and wear characterization of Al-Mg composites synthesized at different temperatures. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 309-322. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024017
    [7] Mohamed Lokman Jalaluddin, Umar Al-Amani Azlan, Mohd Warikh Abd Rashid, Norfauzi Tamin . Effect of sintering temperatures on the physical, structural properties and microstructure of mullite-based ceramics. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 243-255. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024014
    [8] Michael R. Koblischka, Anjela Koblischka-Veneva . Porous high-Tc superconductors and their applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1199-1213. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1199
    [9] Bauyrzhan Rakhadilov, Lyaila Bayatanova, Sherzod Kurbanbekov, Ravil Sulyubayev, Nurdaulet Shektibayev, Nurbol Berdimuratov . Investigation on the effect of technological parameters of electrolyte-plasma cementation method on phase structure and mechanical properties of structural steel 20X. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 934-947. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023050
    [10] Vinda Puspasari, Satrio Herbirowo, Alvin Muhammad Habieb, Dedi Pria Utama, Rahadian Roberto, Bintang Adjiantoro . Effect of sub-zero treatments on hardness and corrosion properties of low-alloy nickel steel. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(1): 55-69. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023004
  • Surface hardening process is one of the final steps to improve the product quality especially in toughness of the steel core. In this study, the SS400 steel was investigated as the potential steel core to be used as a sprocket. However, this material is categorized in low hardness due to its low carbon content. Improving SS400 steel by using surface hardening was carried out by pack carburizing with Mahoni Wood Charcoal (MWC) powder as carburizing. The volume fraction of MWC was varied at 60, 70, and 80% with ratio mixing of BaCO3 activator for 40, 30 and 20%, respectively. The pack carburizing process was conducted at 850 and 900 ℃ with holding time for 1 h followed by quenching. The hardness test showed that the highest hardness value was 677.4 HV at variation of 60% MWC + 40% BaCO3 on 900 ℃ (holding time 1 h). This hardness value number of the sample (60% MWC + 40% BaCO3 on 900 ℃) was higher than raw materials for 452% of raw material. The microstructures also display a martensite structure in this sample.


    Steel is one of the metals types used in machine construction such as gears, shafts and sprocket [1]. Low to high strength steel can be easily formed into a desired product depend on the needs, properties and characters. Generally, steel has a variety of alloying elements such as Sulphur (S), Carbon (C), Silicon (Si), Phosphorus (P), Manganese (Mn) and another element. The most dominant element influencing the steel core is the carbon [2,3]. The amount of carbon content will have an impact on the mechanical properties of steel namely hardness, ductility and formability. Adding carbon content to steel able to increase the hardness and tensile strength, but make it brittle and reduce its tenacity [2].

    Surface hardening process is one of the finishing stages to improve the product quality of steel. Several researchers reported that surface hardening make steel become hard on the surface and toughness in the core, for example in case of gears component: the surface must be hardened due to this component work in contact with one another component. The gear will wear out quickly if the surface hardness is low [1,4].

    Sprocket is one of the most important driving gears from motor vehicle parts, the two-wheeled sprocket as a successor of transmission power which generated by the vehicle's engine. It is directly related to the chain in connected to the rear gear that functions to move the wheels. Therefore, the sprocket has to fulfill a requirement hardness on the edge of its teeth to prevent the sprocket from worn out due to friction caused by the chain [5,6].

    Previous researcher conducted a study on the analysis of the effect carburizing media on the wear and hardness of a Supra X 125 motorcycle sprocket. In that case, they used 35% BaCO3 as activator with a temperature of 900 ℃ and holding time for 2 h. The hardness value before carburizing process of Supra X 125 motorcycle sprocket was 179.67 HV, whereas after the carburizing process achieved by the carburizing media of the “sirep” charcoal achieved in 629 HV [7].

    Alias et al. stated that the increasing of hardness number is effective with surface hardening using carburizing method. Carburizing process is one phenomenon of the addition carbon into steel surface. The carbon will diffuse due to the activator and high temperature in the isolated pack. The active carbon content of each charcoal type is different depend on the source and process [8].

    The research on surface hardening in SS400 steel was investigated by Sujita et al. using snail shell powder as an activator with teak (Tectona grandis) charcoal as a carburizing media. In that study, they did not report a hardness testing [9]. Therefore, this study examined the different things from previous studies namely surface hardening on SS400 steel with mahoni wood charcoal (MWC) as carburizing media and BaCO3 as an activator. Research information about surface hardening on SS400 steel is still enough considered limited, while SS400 steel is very applicable in the automotive industrial world for example sprocket and gear products. The variation of surface hardening was in volume fraction ratio of (MWC:BaCO3) and carburizing temperature. After carburizing, all samples were tested by using hardness and microstructural imaging.

    Mahoni wood charcoal (MWC) was taken from a charcoal factory in Karang Duren village, Balung sub-district, Jember, East Java, Indonesia. The carbon content of MWC was calculated by using Equation 1 as according to previous research [10]. BaCO3 as activator was purchased from CV. Aneka Kimia, Jember, Indonesia. The SS400 steel was used as a steel material for surface hardened which has a carbon content for 0.140%. The detail chemical composition of SS400 steel can be seen in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Chemical composition of SS400 steel.
    %C %Si %Mn %P %S %Ni %Cr %Fe
    0.140 0.180 0.700 0.070 0.010 0.010 0.010 Balance

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The MWC was crushed and sieved with a size of 60 mesh. The results of the 60 mesh sieve were sieved again in 80 mesh sieve. The results of charcoal powder that did not pass the 80 mesh sieve were used for the pack carburizing process. The chemical composition of the specimens of SS400 low carbon steel was shown in Table 1. The specimen and pack carburizing dimension were 3 cm × 3 cm × 0.6 cm and 15.9 cm × 10 cm × 9.5 cm, respectively. The BaCO3 activator was mixed with MWC in variations of 20, 30 and 40 wt%. The specimen was replicated for three pieces for each variation.

    Before carburizing process, all specimens were weighted. Then, it was placed in a closed container pack steel which the content a mixed material of MWC and BaCO3 powder. The carburizing process was carried out at a temperature variation for 850 ℃ and 900 ℃ with a holding time 1 h. After that, it was quenched (rapid cooling) by distilled water for 8 s. All specimens were weighted to determine the mass changes after carburizing process. Then, it was prepared for hardness test and metallography observation.

    The chemical composition of MWC was calculated using Equation 1 as reported by previous research [10]. Before determine the carbon content, there were several steps to obtain the fixed carbon from MWC namely: moisture, ash content and volatile matter calculation. After three steps above, we got fixed carbon. To determine the moisture, ash content and volatile matter, the extraction process accorded to [10,11]. The calculation of fixed carbon as Eq 1 below:

    Fixed  carbon(%)=100%[(moisture,%)+(ash,%)+(volatil  matter,%)] (1)

    Rockwell type C (HRC) with a 150 kg load was used to determine the hardness number of all specimens tested. All specimens were formed according to ASTM E18-15 standard [12]. The test was conducted with transversely direction on the surface. There were five times point of data test on the specimen surface. The results of hardness test were converted in Vickers Hardness Number (VHN). The Illustration of hardness test was presented in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Hardness testing point of all specimens.

    Optical microscope BX451M was used to characterize the metallographic with magnification reaching 1000×. The specimens tested were raw materials (SS400 steel) and carburized materials. The carburized specimens were cut in the middle and then it was prepared for etching process. Before etching process, all specimens were sanded by using sandpaper until shiny (grid 80–2000). After that, metal polish autosol and velvet fabric material were applied for final etching. The etching process was conducted using comparison mixing between HNO3 (Nitridic acid) and ethanol for 2%: 98%. Finally, all specimens ready to be observed by optical microscope. As be noted, this observation aims to determine the total case depth of MWC in SS400 steel after carburizing.

    The carbon percentage diffusion (CPD) into SS400 steel was calculated using a simple weighing method as the change in mass before and after the carburizing process. The CPD can be calculated using Eq 2:

    Carbon  Percentage  Diffusion(%)=wtW0Wo×100% (2)

    where, Wt and W0 were the specimen weight after and before carburizing process, respectively.

    The chemical composition of MWC is presented in Table 2. The chemical composition test includes carbon, water, ash and vapor content. This test aims to determine the purity carbon after the carbonization process.

    Table 2.  The chemical composition of MWC.
    No. Water (%) Ash (%) Vapor (%) Carbon (%)
    1. 2 3 13 82

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    It can be seen in Table 2 that the carbon content of MWC is 82%. This result was higher than previous report about charcoal wood from acacia (Acacia mangium) for 79% [13] and teak wood for 80.18% [14]. According to previous researcher, the high carbon content describes the level of purity of the charcoal produced. This case may be influenced by low levels of volatile matter and ash content. The place of the wood grows greatly influences the chemical composition of the wood, especially its carbon component [13].

    Figure 2 shows the hardness number of all samples tested by the Rockwell method. All samples tested were raw material, 60%MWC:40%BaCO3, 70%MWC:30%BaCO3, and 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 with different heating temperature for 850 ℃ and 900 ℃, respectively. The test was repeated three times for each variation. Each variation was carried out on five times point to determine the accurately hardness value.

    Figure 2.  Hardness number of all specimen tested.

    It can be seen at the figure; the hardness value of raw material is lower than other materials tested for 122.6 HV. This value increase after carburizing process. The highest hardness value was obtained sample 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 with heating temperature 900 ℃ for 677.5 HV (increased 452% from raw material). High heating temperature makes the parent atomic (Fe) has the energy to vibrate, the vibration between the parent atomic affected in stretching (gaps between the parent atoms). The gap between the parent atoms is used by the C atomic to diffuse. The diffusion occurs in this case is interstitial due to the radius of the C atomic is less than 15% of the radius of the parent atomic (Fe) [15]. The heating temperature of 900 ℃ makes the raw material reach the austenite temperature in the Fe3C phase diagram. During the change phase to the austenite temperature, the raw material changes the its crystal structure from Body Center Cubic (BCC) to Face Centered Cubic (FCC) [16,17,18]. This change probably due to the metal has crossed the A3 line in the phase diagram Fe3C. Changing in crystal structure (BCC to FCC) make the carbon solubility in steel increased from 0.02% to 2.14% [16]. This phenomenon proves that the variations in the temperature of 900 ℃ have a higher hardness value than variations in 850 ℃.

    The catalyst acts as a supplier of CO2 which able to bind C atomic directly to charcoal. The sample with variation of 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 produced more CO2 than another variation. According to previous report, the catalyst works as a CO2 carrier in binding the C atomic in the mahogany wood charcoal (MWC) to become CO. The C atomic transported by CO then bounded by Fe in steel. The Fe + CO bond produces [C] Fe + CO2 which [C] is denoted as a dissolved carbon to the Fe in this case steel [19].

    Meanwhile, 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ has an average hardness for 452.5 HV. This value is lower than 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ sample. This is due to the differences in the volume fraction of MWC makes the low diffusion process. However, this sample is still in the austenite temperature. The diffusion process of C atoms continues until the C atoms in the environment have been used up, other than that the cooling method is influential on the pack carburizing method.

    The cooling method used in this study was quenching. After the carburizing process was carried out at temperatures 850 ℃ and 900 ℃ with a holding for 1 h, the steel was removed and cooled quickly with water as a cooling medium. This case makes FCC crystal structure change to BCC structure quickly, but in rapid cooling is not enough time for carbon to diffuse out of the austenite in solid solution. Austenite has higher carbon content than ferrite due to the diffusion process should remove carbon from the solution. However, carbon is trapped because there is no more diffusion due to cold temperatures. This phenomenon affected in BCC structure become Body Centered Tetragonal (BCT) structure or martensite phase which indicated hard properties in steel material [16].

    Microstructure observations were carried out to determine the changes in microstructure due to the influence of temperature and volume fraction of MWC before and after carburizing process (Figure 3). Figure 3a displays the microstructure of raw material (before carburizing process). It can be seen that raw material has ferrite and pearlite phase. The ferrite phase is shown in bright colors while the pearlite is shown in a dark color. The number of ferrite phases looks more than the pearlite phase. It synchronized with the hardness number result that raw material has low hardness for 122.6 HV. The ferrite phase makes a ductile property in a steel [20]. This is similar with the previous report which indicated ferrite phenomenon [9].

    Figure 3.  Microstructural observation of all samples tested: (a) raw material, (b) 80MWC:20BaCO3 at 850 ℃, (c) 60MWC:40BaCO3 at 850 ℃, (d) 80MWC:20BaCO3 at 900 ℃ and (e) 60MWC:40BaCO3 at 900 ℃.

    Figure 3b displays the specimen after carburizing process with 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃. It shows the ferrite, pearlite and martensite structure. The martensite structure is formed on the surface while in the steel core material is formed pearlite-ferrite structure which is more dominated by ferrite phase. The martensite structure is formed due to the diffusion of C atom during pack carburizing process which is followed by the quenching process with the water as cooling media. This variation has the lowest total case depth diffusion for 0.20 mm compared to other variations. This phenomenon due to the carburizing process at 850 ℃ which affirmed by the carbon diffusion takes place on the body centered cubic (BCC) crystal structure. In this body, the carbon solubility value is 0.02%. The BaCO3 catalyst serves to produce CO2 which effected in C binding from MWC. This process produces CO which diffuses in the steel [19]. In contrast with Figure 3c (60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃), this specimen has total case depth diffusion for 0.32 mm even though the structure is similar with Figure 3b. The 40% catalyst helps to accelerate the rate of carbon diffusion due to the abundant supply of CO2.

    Figure 3d shows the specimen microstructure in composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃. The structure in this composition is ferrite, pearlite and martensite (lath martensite). The total case depth diffusion is 0.40 mm. This is due to the carburizing process carried out at 900 ℃ which occurs the structural changes from BCC to FCC with carbon solubility increases from 0.02% to 2.14%. This case effected in increasing the number of C atoms diffusion [21,22]. The different case was showed by Figure 3e (60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃). The structure has similar with Figure 3d. But the different is in total case depth diffusion. The total case depth diffusion in this specimen is 0.55 mm. This result was higher than all specimen tested. It is due to the role of temperature and activator during carburizing process which resulting in CO2 supply during carburizing [21].

    Table 3 presents the percentage of carbon diffusion (CPD) from MWC into SS400 steel after carburizing treatment. The highest CPD was in specimen with composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ for 0.98%. This phenomenon was probably indicated by the addition of MWC which diffuses from the pack environment to the steel surface. The similar phenomenon was reported in previous report [23].

    Table 3.  The percentage of carbon diffusion in SS400 steel.
    Specimen W0 (g) Wt (g) ΔW (g) Percentage of diffusion (%)
    60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ 37.24630 37.55024 0.30394 0.81
    70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ 36.27071 36.42082 0.15011 0.41
    80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ 38.04883 38.05864 0.00981 0.02
    60%MWC:40%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ 40.03520 40.42880 0.39360 0.98
    70%MWC:30%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ 39.22458 39.57023 0.34565 0.88
    80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 900 ℃ 38.04883 38.36106 0.31223 0.82

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Meanwhile, the specimen with composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ has the lowest CPD. From Table 3, it presents a little weight addition from 38.04883 to 38.05864 (CPD 0.02%). This phenomenon due to the slow process of carbon diffusion from the pack environment to the steel surface. The higher of the temperature and activator content then the deeper of carbon diffusion rate in steel.

    The following conclusion could be derived from this study:

    1. Pack carburizing process with temperature and volume faction variation influences SS400 steel hardness value, where the highest hardness value in composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 with temperature 900 ℃ for 677.4 HV, while the lowest hardness value in composition 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 at 850 ℃ for 278 HV. The higher temperature resulting in faster carbon diffusion.

    2. Microstructure observation after carburizing process displays more dominant martensite phase but ferrite and pearlite phases are still present. Martensite phase in composition 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 sample is formed more due to the deeper carbon diffusion. The hardness value is recommended to improve the quality product and probably as potential material for sprocket parts application.

    3. The mass changes occur in the pack carburizing process. The variation of 60%MWC:40%BaCO3 experienced as the highest mass increase of 0.39360 g. Meanwhile, the variation of 80%MWC:20%BaCO3 become the lowest variation of carbon additions which was 0.00981 g.

    We thanks to University of Jember for its funding and supporting this research in the year of 2020.

    We declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Jo B, Sharifimehr S, Shim Y, et al. (2017) Cyclic deformation and fatigue behavior of carburized automotive gear steel and predictions including multiaxial stress states. Int J Fatigue 100: 454-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.023
    [2] Mathew M, Rajendrakumar PK (2011) Optimization of process parameters of boro-carburized low carbon steel for tensile strength by Taquchi method with grey relational analysis. Mater Design 32: 3637-3644. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.007
    [3] Nomura M, Morimoto H, Toyama M (2000) Calculation of ferrite decarburizing depth, considering chemical composition of steel and heating condition. ISIJ Int 40: 619-623. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.40.619
    [4] Ebhota Williams S, Emmanuel A, Peter O (2014) Fundamentals of sprocket design and reverse engineering of rear sprocket of a Yamaha CY80 motorcycle. Int J Eng Tech 4: 170-179.
    [5] Paul RC, Balaji R, Amal Rebin AX, et al. (2019) Modification in variable gear ratios along with fuel saving technology. Int J Sci Tech Res 8: 2367-2371.
    [6] Chen Z, Zhai W, Wang K (2017) Dynamic investigation of a locomotive with effect of gear transmissions under tractive conditions. J Sound Vib 408: 220-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.017
    [7] Gunawan S, Harton SB (2015) Analisis pengaruh media pack carburizing terhadap keausan dan kekerasan sproket sepeda motor. Traksi 15: 52-59.
    [8] Alias SK, Abdullah B, Jaffara A, et al. (2013) Mechanical properties of paste carburized ASTM A516 steel. Procedia Eng 68: 525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.216
    [9] Sujita RS, Siswanto E, Widodo TD (2018) Study on fatigue strength of pack carburizing steel ss400 with alternative carburizer media of pomacea canalikulata lamarck shell powder. Int J Appl Eng Res 13: 8844-8849.
    [10] Hardjana AK (2010) Potensi biomassa dan karbon pada hutan tanaman Acacia mangium di HTI PT. Surya Hutani Jaya, Kalimantan Timur. JPSEK 7: 237-249.
    [11] ASTM D3172-07a (2007) Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke. Available from: https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D3172-07A.htm.
    [12] ASTM E18-15 (2015) Standard test methods for Rockwell hardness of metallic materials. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials. Avaliable from: https://repositorio.uisek.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/2680/3/ASTM_E18-15.pdf.
    [13] Veronika YK (2005) Studi pembuatan arang aktif dari tiga jenis arang produk agroforestry desa nglanggeran, patuk, gunung kidul, daerah istimewa Yogyakarta. Available from: https://teknologihutan.fkt.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/675/2019/01/Pembuatan_Arang_Aktif_dari_Tiga_Jenis_Arang_Produk_Agroforestry_di_Desa_Nglanggeran_Patuk_Gunungkidul-1.pdf.
    [14] Salim R (2016) The quality and characteristics of teak (tectona grandis) charcoal made by mixed carbonisation in drum kiln. JRIHH 8: 53-64.
    [15] Hantoro S, Tiwan T (2005) Diffusion bonding material tungsten-baja dengan interlayer ag-4% cu. Teknoin 10: 41-52.
    [16] Callister WD, Rethwisch DG (2011) Materials Science and Engineering, 8 Eds., John Wiley & Sons, 5: 344-348.
    [17] Budinski KG, Budinski MK (1970) Engineering Materials: Properties and Selection, 9 Eds., Reston Publication.
    [18] Sakura RR, Suheni S, Iskandar DD (2017) Pengaruh variasi karbon aktif dan waktu tahan terhadap kekerasan material JIS G-3123 menggunakan metode pack carburizing. REM J 2: 31-35.
    [19] Bepari MMA (2017) Carburizing: A method of case hardening of steel, Comprehensive Materials Finishing, Elsevier, 2: 71-106.
    [20] Concepcion VL, Lorusso HN, Svoboda HG (2015) Effect of carbon content on microstructure and mechanical properties of dual phase steels. Procedia Mater Sci 8: 1047-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.167
    [21] Negara DNKP, Widiyarta IM (2019) The study on mechanical properties of pack carburized low carbon steel using BaCO3 as energizer. ICMSE 673: 012125.
    [22] Madu KE, Uyaelumuo AE (2018) Parametric analysis of the effects of carburizing process on the mechanical properties of carburized mild steel. Equatorial J Eng 2018: 14-21.
    [23] Rajagukguk TO, Sumardi S, Triono A (2017) Variasi waktu dan temperatur pelapisan hot dip galvanizing terhadap laju korosi serta uji impact material baja karbon rendah (0.02% C). Mechanical 8: 14-23.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Balaji Devarajan, Rajeshkumar LakshmiNarasimhan, Bhuvaneswari Venkateswaran, Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa, Suchart Siengchin, Additive manufacturing of jute fiber reinforced polymer composites: A concise review of material forms and methods, 2022, 43, 0272-8397, 6735, 10.1002/pc.26789
    2. Chung-Chun Wu, Effective Case Depth and Wear Resistance of Pack Carburized SCM 420 Steel Processed Using Different Concentrations of Natural Shell Waste Powders and Carburizing Duration, 2022, 12, 2073-4352, 296, 10.3390/cryst12020296
    3. Chung-Chun Wu, Adel Shaaban, Mechanical Properties of Pack Carburized SCM 420 Steel Processed Using Natural Shell Powders and Extended Carburization Time, 2021, 11, 2073-4352, 1136, 10.3390/cryst11091136
    4. Arif CANBULDU, Oğuz ERDEM, Katı Ortam Sementasyonunun Parametreleri ve Uygulama Alanları, 2023, 1308-5514, 10.29137/umagd.1401035
    5. Clifford Ehi-Okoebor, Enesi Y. Salawu, Sunday A. Afolalu, Oluseyi O. Ajayi, Joseph F. Kayode, Sunday L. Lawal, 2023, Importance of hybrid organic carburizers on the Mechanical properties of mild steel: A Review, 979-8-3503-2478-5, 1, 10.1109/SEB-SDG57117.2023.10124621
    6. Chung-Chun Wu, Study on microstructure and wear characteristics of carburized steel at different carburizing times using catalyst strombus turturella shell waste powders, 2023, 1267, 1755-1307, 012019, 10.1088/1755-1315/1267/1/012019
    7. Ramzul Irham Riza, Ubaidillah Nur Fais, Nurmuntaha Agung Nugraha, Abdul Malik, 2024, 2838, 0094-243X, 060019, 10.1063/5.0185784
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5091) PDF downloads(337) Cited by(7)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog