Influence of normalizing post carburizing treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of low alloy gear steels

Pavan Hiremath; Gowrishankar M. C.; Manjunath Shettar; Sathyashankara Sharma; Jayashree P. K.; Suhas Kowshik; Pavan Hiremath; Gowrishankar M. C.; Manjunath Shettar; Sathyashankara Sharma; Jayashree P. K.; Suhas Kowshik

doi:10.3934/matersci.2021051

AIMS Materials Science

2021, Volume 8, Issue 5: 836-851. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021051

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Topical Sections

Influence of normalizing post carburizing treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of low alloy gear steels

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Received: 28 June 2021 Accepted: 31 October 2021 Published: 30 November 2021

Steel is a versatile metal, got a wide range of applications in all the fields of engineering and technology. Generally, low carbon steels are tough and high alloy carbon steels are hard in nature. Certain applications demand both properties in the same steel. Carburization is one such technique that develops hard and wear resistant surfaces with a soft core. The objective of this work is to study the influence of post carburizing treatment (normalizing) on three grades of steels (EN 3, 20MnCr5, and EN 353). Post carburizing treatments are necessary to overcome the adverse effects of carburization alone. Here carburization was carried out in the propane atmosphere by heating the gas carburizing furnace to 930 ℃ for more than a day. Normalizing was carried out at 870 ℃ for 1 h and cooled in air. Tensile, hardness, Charpy impact tests along with SEM (scanning electron microscopy) and EDAX (energy dispersive X-ray analysis) were conducted to analyze the phase transformation, failure mode analysis in all the samples. Carburized steels displayed the formation of ferrite, pearlite, and sometimes bainite phases in the core and complete coarse pearlite in the case regions, whereas in the post carburized steels, increased amount of ferrite, fine pearlite, and bainite in the core and fine pearlite with traces of bainite in the case region was observed. Normalizing also refines the grain with increased UTS (ultimate tensile strength), hardness, and impact resistance. EN 353 showed higher UTS among the steels with 898 MPa after carburization and 1370 MPa after normalizing treatment. Maximum hardness of 48 HRC was observed in 20MnCr5 and toughness was superior in EN 3 with energy absorbed during test i.e., 8 and 12 J before and after normalizing treatment. Based on the fracture surface analysis, in EN 353 steel, a finer array of dimples with voids and elongated bigger clustered dimples containing ultrafine dimples array are observed in the core and case respectively during carburizing whereas, more density of river pattern and cleavage failure (brittle) are observed in the core and case respectively after post carburizing (normalizing) treatment. There is a reduction in the ductility of the steels after post carburizing treatment. It was observed that normalizing treatment produces superior mechanical properties in the carburized steels by grain refinement and strong microstructures like bainite. Normalizing as post carburizing treatment can be recommended for engineering applications where ductile core and hard surface are of great importance.
- carburization,
- normalizing treatment,
- pearlite,
- interlamellar distance,
- bainite
Citation: Pavan Hiremath, Gowrishankar M. C., Manjunath Shettar, Sathyashankara Sharma, Jayashree P. K., Suhas Kowshik. Influence of normalizing post carburizing treatment on microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of low alloy gear steels[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 836-851. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021051

Related Papers:

Abstract

Steel is a versatile metal, got a wide range of applications in all the fields of engineering and technology. Generally, low carbon steels are tough and high alloy carbon steels are hard in nature. Certain applications demand both properties in the same steel. Carburization is one such technique that develops hard and wear resistant surfaces with a soft core. The objective of this work is to study the influence of post carburizing treatment (normalizing) on three grades of steels (EN 3, 20MnCr5, and EN 353). Post carburizing treatments are necessary to overcome the adverse effects of carburization alone. Here carburization was carried out in the propane atmosphere by heating the gas carburizing furnace to 930 ℃ for more than a day. Normalizing was carried out at 870 ℃ for 1 h and cooled in air. Tensile, hardness, Charpy impact tests along with SEM (scanning electron microscopy) and EDAX (energy dispersive X-ray analysis) were conducted to analyze the phase transformation, failure mode analysis in all the samples. Carburized steels displayed the formation of ferrite, pearlite, and sometimes bainite phases in the core and complete coarse pearlite in the case regions, whereas in the post carburized steels, increased amount of ferrite, fine pearlite, and bainite in the core and fine pearlite with traces of bainite in the case region was observed. Normalizing also refines the grain with increased UTS (ultimate tensile strength), hardness, and impact resistance. EN 353 showed higher UTS among the steels with 898 MPa after carburization and 1370 MPa after normalizing treatment. Maximum hardness of 48 HRC was observed in 20MnCr5 and toughness was superior in EN 3 with energy absorbed during test i.e., 8 and 12 J before and after normalizing treatment. Based on the fracture surface analysis, in EN 353 steel, a finer array of dimples with voids and elongated bigger clustered dimples containing ultrafine dimples array are observed in the core and case respectively during carburizing whereas, more density of river pattern and cleavage failure (brittle) are observed in the core and case respectively after post carburizing (normalizing) treatment. There is a reduction in the ductility of the steels after post carburizing treatment. It was observed that normalizing treatment produces superior mechanical properties in the carburized steels by grain refinement and strong microstructures like bainite. Normalizing as post carburizing treatment can be recommended for engineering applications where ductile core and hard surface are of great importance.

References

[1]	Kajihara M (2009) Numerical analysis for migration of austenite/ferrite interface during carburization of Fe. J Mater Sci 44: 2109-2118. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3299-9
[2]	Christ HJ (1998) Experimental characterization and computerbased description of the carburization behaviour of the austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L. Mater Corros 49: 258-265. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4176(199804)49:4<258::AID-MACO258>3.0.CO;2-U
[3]	Sudha C, Bharasi NS, Anand R, et al. (2010) Carburization behavior of AISI 316LN austenitic stainless steel—Experimental studies and modeling. J Nucl Mater 402: 186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.023
[4]	Akiyama M, Oki Y, Nagai M (2012) Steam reforming of ethanol over carburized alkali-doped nickel on zirconia and various supports for hydrogen production. Catal Today 181:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.09.043
[5]	Boniatti R, Bandeira AL, Crespi Â E, et al. (2013) The influence of surface microstructure and chemical composition on corrosion behaviour in fuel-grade bio-ethanol of low-alloy steel modified by plasma nitro-carburizing and post-oxidizing. Appl Surf Sci 280: 156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.116
[6]	Yin L, Ma X, Tang G, et al. (2019) Characterization of carburized 14Cr14Co13Mo4 stainless steel by low pressure carburizing. Surf Coat Technol 358: 654-660. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.090
[7]	Roy S, Sundararajan S (2019) Effect of retained austenite on spalling behavior of carburized AISI 8620 steel under boundary lubrication. Int J Fatigue 119: 238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.001
[8]	Lødeng R, Ranga C, Rajkhowa T, et al. (2017) Hydrodeoxygenation of phenolics in liquid phase over supported MoO₃ and carburized analogues. Biomass Convers Biorefin 7: 343-359. doi: 10.1007/s13399-017-0252-z
[9]	Kvryan A, Efaw C, Higginbotham K, et al. (2019) Corrosion initiation and propagation on carburized martensitic stainless steel surfaces studied via advanced scanning probe microscopy. Materials 12: 940. doi: 10.3390/ma12060940
[10]	McLeod AC, Bishop CM, Stevens KJ, et al. (2015) Microstructure and carburization detection in HP alloy pyrolysis tubes. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 4: 273-285. doi: 10.1007/s13632-015-0210-8
[11]	Gupta A, Singla G, Pandey OP (2016) Effect of synthesis parameters on structural and thermal properties of NbC/C nano composite synthesized via in-situ carburization reduction route at low temperature. Ceram Int 42: 13024-13034. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.081
[12]	Niu L, Liu X, Liu X, et al. (2017) In situ XRD study on promotional effect of potassium on carburization of spray-dried precipitated Fe₂O₃ catalysts. ChemCatChem 9: 1691-1700. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201601665
[13]	Hegde A, Sharma S, Sadanand RV (2019) Mechanical characterization and optimization of heat treatment parameters of manganese alloyed austempered ductile iron. J Mech Eng Sci 13: 4356-4367. doi: 10.15282/jmes.13.1.2019.01.0371
[14]	Ahmed HM, Seetharaman S (2010) Reduction-carburization of NiO-WO₃ under isothermal conditions using H₂-CH₄ gas mixture. Metall Mater Trans B 41: 173-181. doi: 10.1007/s11663-009-9307-2
[15]	Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Zaefferer S, Raabe D (2010) The effect of grain size and grain orientation on deformation twinning in a Fe-22wt.% Mn-0.6wt.% C TWIP steel. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 527: 3552-3560. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.041
[16]	Gramlich A, Schmiedl T, Schönborn S, et al. (2020) Development of air-hardening martensitic forging steels. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 784: 139321. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139321
[17]	Faccoli M, Ghidini A, Mazzù A (2019) Changes in the microstructure and mechanical properties of railway wheel steels as a result of the thermal load caused by shoe braking. Metall Mater Trans A 50: 1701-1714. doi: 10.1007/s11661-019-05135-x
[18]	Medyński D, Janus A (2018) Effect of heat treatment parameters on abrasive wear and corrosion resistance of austenitic nodular cast iron Ni-Mn-Cu. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18: 515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2017.08.001
[19]	Zheng B, Shu G, Jiang Q (2019) Experimental study on residual stresses in cold rolled austenitic stainless steel hollow sections. J Constr Steel Res 152: 94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.021
[20]	Sajid HU, Kiran R (2018) Influence of stress concentration and cooling methods on post-fire mechanical behavior of ASTM A36 steels. Constr Build Mater 186: 920-945. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.006
[21]	An JH, Lee J, Kim YS, et al. (2019) Effects of post weld heat treatment on mechanical and electrochemical properties of welded carbon steel pipe. Met Mater Int 25: 304-312. doi: 10.1007/s12540-018-0201-9
[22]	Pandey C, Mahapatra MM, Kumar P, et al. (2018) Homogenization of P91 weldments using varying normalizing and tempering treatment. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 710: 86-101. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.086
[23]	Kusakin P, Belyakov A, Haase C, et al. (2014) Microstructure evolution and strengthening mechanisms of Fe-23Mn-0.3C-1.5Al TWIP steel during cold rolling. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 617: 52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.08.051
[24]	Senopati G, Sutowo C, Kartika I, et al. (2019) The effect of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Mo-6Nb-8Sn alloy. Mater Today Proc 13: 224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.218
[25]	Bakhtiari R, Ekrami A (2009) The effect of bainite morphology on the mechanical properties of a high bainite dual phase (HBDP) steel. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 525: 159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.042
[26]	van Bohemen SMC (2012) Bainite and martensite start temperature calculated with exponential carbon dependence. Mater Sci Tech-Lond 28: 487-495. doi: 10.1179/1743284711Y.0000000097
[27]	Yang J, Yu H, Yin J, et al. (2016) Formation and control of martensite in Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater Design 108: 308-318. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.117
[28]	Adnan F, Sajuri Z, Omar MZ (2019) Effect of uniaxial load on microstructure and mechanical properties of Thixo-joint AISI D2 tool steel. J Mech Eng Sci 13: 5006-5020. doi: 10.15282/jmes.13.2.2019.17.0414
[29]	Dmitrieva O, Ponge D, Inden G, et al. (2011) Chemical gradients across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation. Acta Mater 59: 364-374. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.042
[30]	Odusote K, Adekunle AS, Rabiu AB (2015) Effect of vegetable oil quenchants on the properties of aluminum during solution heat treatment. J Mech Eng Sci 8: 1343-1350. doi: 10.15282/jmes.8.2015.9.0131
[31]	Pandey C, Mahapatra MM, Kumar P, et al. (2017) Microstructure characterization and charpy toughness of P91 weldment for as-welded, post-weld heat treatment and normalizing & tempering heat treatment. Met Mater Int 23: 900-914. doi: 10.1007/s12540-017-6850-2
[32]	Majid MSA, Daud R, Afendi M, et al. (2014) Stress-strain response modelling of glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite pipes under multiaxial loadings. J Mech Eng Sci 6: 916-928. doi: 10.15282/jmes.6.2014.18.0088
[33]	Ghadimi H, Nedjhad Sh, Eghbali B (2013) Enhanced grain refinement of cast aluminum alloy by thermal and mechanical treatment of Al-5Ti-B master alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23: 1563-1569. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62631-X
[34]	Wang T, Cao F, Chen Z, et al. (2015) Three dimensional microstructures and wear resistance of Al-Bi immiscible alloys with different grain refiners. Sci China Technol Sci 58: 870-875. doi: 10.1007/s11431-015-5816-1
[35]	Rosip NIM, Ahmad S, Jamaludin KR, et al. (2013) Production of 316L stainless steel (SS316L) foam via slurry method. J Mech Eng Sci 5: 707-712. doi: 10.15282/jmes.5.2013.17.0068
[36]	Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E, et al. (2015) Analysis of temperature and fracture surface of AISI4140 steel in very high cycle fatigue regime. Theor Appl Fract Mec 80: 22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.007
[37]	Casati R, Lemke J, Vedani M (2016) Microstructure and fracture behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Sci Technol 32: 738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.016
[38]	Rafi HK, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2013) A comparison of the tensile, fatigue, and fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V and 15-5 PH stainless steel parts made by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 69: 1299-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5106-7
[39]	Pandey C, Saini N, Mahapatra MM, et al. (2017) Study of the fracture surface morphology of impact and tensile tested cast and forged (C & F) Grade 91 steel at room temperature for different heat treatment regimes. Eng Fail Anal 71: 131-147. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.012

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)