Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Dynamics of a general model of nonlinear difference equations and its applications to LPA model

  • In this study, we investigate the qualitative properties of solutions to a general model of difference equations (DEs), which includes the flour beetle model as a particular case. We investigate local and global stability and boundedness, as well as the periodic behavior of the solutions to this model. Moreover, we present some general theorems that help study the periodicity of solutions to the DEs. The presented numerical examples support the finding and illustrate the behavior of the solutions for the studied model. A significant agricultural pest that is extremely resistant to insecticides is the flour beetle. Therefore, studying the qualitative characteristics of the solutions in this model greatly helps in understanding the behavior of this pest and how to resist it or benefit from it. By applying the general results to the flour beetle model, we clarify the conditions of global stability, boundedness, and periodicity.

    Citation: Wedad Albalawi, Fatemah Mofarreh, Osama Moaaz. Dynamics of a general model of nonlinear difference equations and its applications to LPA model[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6072-6086. doi: 10.3934/era.2024281

    Related Papers:

    [1] Najmeddine Attia, Ahmed Ghezal . Global stability and co-balancing numbers in a system of rational difference equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2137-2159. doi: 10.3934/era.2024097
    [2] Bin Wang . Random periodic sequence of globally mean-square exponentially stable discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with discrete spatial diffusions. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3097-3122. doi: 10.3934/era.2023157
    [3] Xueyong Zhou, Xiangyun Shi . Stability analysis and backward bifurcation on an SEIQR epidemic model with nonlinear innate immunity. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3481-3508. doi: 10.3934/era.2022178
    [4] Junseok Kim . Maximum principle preserving the unconditionally stable method for the Allen–Cahn equation with a high-order potential. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 433-446. doi: 10.3934/era.2025021
    [5] E. A. Abdel-Rehim . The time evolution of the large exponential and power population growth and their relation to the discrete linear birth-death process. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2487-2509. doi: 10.3934/era.2022127
    [6] Xiangwen Yin . Promoting peer learning in education: Exploring continuous action iterated dilemma and team leader rotation mechanism in peer-led instruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6552-6563. doi: 10.3934/era.2023331
    [7] Junhai Ma, Hui Jiang . Dynamics of a nonlinear differential advertising model with single parameter sales promotion strategy. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1142-1157. doi: 10.3934/era.2022061
    [8] Yan Geng, Jinhu Xu . Modelling and analysis of a delayed viral infection model with follicular dendritic cell. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(8): 5127-5138. doi: 10.3934/era.2024236
    [9] Kerioui Nadjah, Abdelouahab Mohammed Salah . Stability and Hopf bifurcation of the coexistence equilibrium for a differential-algebraic biological economic system with predator harvesting. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1641-1660. doi: 10.3934/era.2020084
    [10] A. M. Elaiw, E. A. Almohaimeed, A. D. Hobiny . Modeling the co-infection of HTLV-2 and HIV-1 in vivo. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6032-6071. doi: 10.3934/era.2024280
  • In this study, we investigate the qualitative properties of solutions to a general model of difference equations (DEs), which includes the flour beetle model as a particular case. We investigate local and global stability and boundedness, as well as the periodic behavior of the solutions to this model. Moreover, we present some general theorems that help study the periodicity of solutions to the DEs. The presented numerical examples support the finding and illustrate the behavior of the solutions for the studied model. A significant agricultural pest that is extremely resistant to insecticides is the flour beetle. Therefore, studying the qualitative characteristics of the solutions in this model greatly helps in understanding the behavior of this pest and how to resist it or benefit from it. By applying the general results to the flour beetle model, we clarify the conditions of global stability, boundedness, and periodicity.



    In phenomena where the plurality of observations of a temporally changing variable are discrete, difference equations (DE) are utilized to explain how a phenomenon develops in real life. These equations therefore become crucial in mathematical models. Applications involving higher-order nonlinear DEs are very common. Furthermore, the DEs naturally arise as numerical solutions and discrete analogs to ordinary and functional differential equations that model a wide range of distinct biological, physical, and economic events, see [1,2,3,4,5].

    The global asymptotic behavior, as a qualitative characteristic of solutions to linear DEs, has significant applications in a variety of fields, such as control theory, biology, neural networks, and many more. It is difficult to verify the global stability of solutions to a DE using numerical methods. As a result, many mathematicians and engineers are interested in the analytical study of those qualitative features because it is the only way to understand those properties (see [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]).

    In [13], Sun and Xi investigated the stability of the DE

    Bm+1=F(Bmk,Bml), (1.1)

    where k and l are in Z, k<l, and F(s,t) is non-increasing in s and non-decreasing in t. In [14], Kocic et al. studied the stability of

    Bm+1=(1δ)Bm+δBmk(1+η(1(BmkM)γ))+, (1.2)

    which describes the dynamics of baleen whales.

    The study of general models of difference equations, despite its difficulty compared to the study of specific models, provides more results, creates new methods, and gives a more general overview of similar models. Abdelrahman et al. [15,16] investigated the qualitative properties of the DE

    Bm+1=αBml+βBmk+F(Bml,Bmk), (1.3)

    where α,β[0,), FC((0,)2,(0,)), and F is homogenous with degree 0.

    Recently, Moaaz et al. [17,18,19] examined the asymptotic features of the DEs

    Bm+1=F(Bml,Bmk) (1.4)

    and

    Bm+1=αBm1eF(Bm,Bm1). (1.5)

    Definition 1. [20] The function ϕ is called a homothetic function if there exist functions G:RR and H:R2R, such that G is a monotonic function, H is a homogenous function with degree κ, and ϕ(t,s)=G(H(t,s)).

    In this work, we study the general DE

    Bm+1=αBm+βBmΦ(Bm,Bm), (E)

    where Φ is a homothetic function, and

    (H1) m,Z+, α[0,), β, B, B+1, ..., B0(0,).

    (H2) Φ is a homothetic function, where Φ(t,s)=G(H(t,s)) and H is a homogenous function with degree κ>0.

    Theorem 1. [21, Theorem 1.3.1] Suppose that f1, f2C([0,)2,[0,1)) satisfy

    (ⅰ) f1 and f2 are non-increasing in each of their arguments;

    (ⅱ) f1(u,u)>0 for u0;

    (ⅲ) f1(u,v)+f2(u,v)<1 for u,v(0,).

    Then the zero equilibrium of the DE

    Bn+1=f1(Bn,Bn1)Bn+f2(Bn,Bn1)Bn1,B1,B0>0,

    is globally asymptotically stable.

    Here, we define F:[0,)×[0,)(0,) by

    F(t,s)=αt+βsΦ(t,s). (2.1)

    A fixed point p, in [0,)×[0,), is called an equilibrium point (EP) of the DE Bm+1=F(Bm,Bm). The study of any physical system's dynamics centers on the concept of EPs (states). All states (solutions) of a particular system tend to its equilibrium state, which is known from multiple applications in science.

    Now, we assume F(p,p)=p and look for the positive EPs. Then,

    p=αp+βpΦ(p,p).

    Thus, we obtain

    ((1α)βΦ(p,p))p=0.

    Since Φ=G(H) and H is a homogenous function with degree κ, we obtain

    Φ(p,p)=G(H(p,p))=G((p)κH(1,1))=1αβ. (2.2)

    Hence,

    p=(λH(1,1))1/κ, (2.3)

    under the conditions κ0, H(1,1)>0 and

    λ:=G1(1αβ)>0. (2.4)

    Thus, EPs of (E) are zero and the positive value defined in (2.3).

    This section is concerned with determining the criteria that guarantee that the EP of DE (E) is locally asymptotically stable (LAS), or globally asymptotically stable (GAS).

    Determining the behavior of solutions of DEs near EPs is one of the main objectives when studying them. It is easy to verify that

    tF(t,s)=α+βsΦt(s,t)=α+βsG(H(t,s))Ht(t,s), (2.5)

    and

    sF(t,s)=βΦ(t,s)+βsΦs(t,s)=βG(H(t,s))+βsG(H(t,s))Hs(t,s). (2.6)

    By substituting for (t,s)=(0,0) in (2.5) and (2.6), we have that the linearized equation about the trivial EP is

    zm+1=αzm+βG(0)zm. (2.7)

    When =1, employing [21, Theorem 1.1], we get that the trivial EP of Eq (E) is (see Figure 1):

    (a) LAS and sink if α<1βG(0)<2;

    (b) unstable and repeller if α>1 and α<|1βG(0)|;

    (c) saddle point if α+4βG(0)>0 and α>|1βG(0)|;

    (d) nonhyperbolic point if α=|1βG(0)|.

    Figure 1.  The topological classification for zero EP of (E).

    From Figure 1, it is easy to see the areas where the different types of stability and instability occur. We also notice that LAS occurs when the values of α and ˆβ:=βG(0) lie below the straight line α+ˆβ=1.

    Whereas when >1, the trivial EP of Eq (E) is LAS if α+β|G(0)|<1. On the other hand, the linearized equation about the positive EP is

    zm+1=L1zm+L2zm, (2.8)

    where

    L1:=α+βHt(1,1)H(1,1)λG(λ),

    and

    L2:=1α+βHs(1,1)H(1,1)λG(λ).

    By using the Clark criterion (see [14, Theorem 1.3.7]), we get that the positive EP of (E) is asymptotically stable if

    |L1|+|L2|<1. (2.9)

    Next, we study the global stability of EPs of Eq (E).

    Theorem 2. Assume that =1, Φ has non-positive partial derivatives, and there is a real number c such that 0<Φ(t,s)c for all t,s[0,). Then the zero EP of (E) is GAS if α>0 and α+cβ<1.

    Proof. Assume that F is defined as in (2.1). Now, we define the functions

    f0(t,s):=αf1(t,s):=βΦ(t,s).

    Then, Eq (E) takes the form

    Bm+1=f0(Bm,Bm1)Bm+f1(Bm,Bm1)Bm1.

    Hence, it is easy to notice the following:

    1) f0 and f1 are non-increasing with respect to t and s.

    2) f0(t,t)>0 for all t0.

    3) Since α+cβ<1, we have

    Φ(t,s)c<1αβ,

    and so α+βΦ(t,s)<1. Therefore,

    f0(t,s)+f1(t,s)<1 for all t,s(0,).

    From Theorem 1, the zero EP of (E) is GAS. This completes the proof.

    Theorem 3. Suppose that α(0,1) and there is a real number h such that 0<Φ(t,s)h. If α+βh<1, then limmBm=0.

    Proof. We define the sequence {˜Bm}m=0 by

    ˜Bm:=max{Bmi, i=0,1,...,}.

    From (E), we see that

    Bm+1˜Bm[α+βΦ(Bm,Bm)]˜Bm[α+βh]˜Bm. (2.10)

    Hence, the sequence {˜Bm}m=0 is nonincreasing, and so limt˜Bm=B00.

    Suppose that B0>0. Then, for all ϵ>0, there is a M>0 such that Bm˜Bm<B0+ϵ for all m>M. It follows from (2.10) that

    Bm+1<(B0+ϵ)(α+βh). (2.11)

    Since α+βh<1, there is a ϵ>0 small enough such that α+βh<12ϵ, and so

    (B0+ϵ)(α+βh)<B0ϵ,

    which with (2.11) gives Bm+1<B0ϵ. Therefore, limtBmB0ϵ, a contradiction. Then, B0=0 and limtBm=0. This completes the proof.

    Lemma 1. Suppose that Φ(t,t)<0. Then, F(t,t) satisfies the negative feedback condition

    (tp)(F(t,t)t)<0 (2.12)

    for tR+{p}.

    Proof. We define the function

    Θ(t):=F(t,t)t.

    Then,

    Θ(t)=(α1)t+βtΦ(t,t)=t[α1+βΦ(t,t)].

    It is easy to notice that Θ(t)=0 if and only if t=0 or p. Now, assume t<p. Hence, Φ(t,t)>Φ(p,p)=(1α)/β, and then Θ(t)>0. Also, if t>p, then Θ(t)<0. Therefore, F(t,t) satisfies condition (2.12). This completes the proof.

    Lemma 2. Suppose that α(0,1), λ>0, and there is a real number c such that sΦ(t,s)c. Then

    limsupmBmcβ(1α). (2.13)

    Proof. From (E), we have

    Bm+1=αBm+βBmΦ(Bm,Bm)αBm+cβ.

    It is easy to verify that the sequence on the right side has the solution

    αm+1B0+cβ1αm+11α.

    Then

    Bm+1αm+1B0+cβ1αm+11α.

    Taking limsup as m, we arrive at (2.13). The proof is complete.

    We create, in the following, a criterion to ensure that there are two-cycle periodic solutions to Eq (E).

    Theorem 4. Suppose that is odd. DE (E) has a prime period two solution if and only if there is a real number γ>0 such that

    αγ+βG(H(γ,1)H(1,γ)G1(γαβγ))=1, (2.14)

    and this solution is {Sm}m=2 where

    Sm:={γH1/κ(1,γ)[G1(γαβγ)]1/κformeven;H1/κ(γ,1)[G1(1αγβ)]1/κformodd.

    Proof. Suppose that (E) has a prime period two solution {...,l,k,l,k,l,k,...}. It follows from (E) that

    l=αk+βlΦ(k,l), (2.15)
    k=αl+βkΦ(l,k). (2.16)

    From (2.15), we obtain

    1αkl=βG(H(k,l))=βG(lκH(kl,1)),

    and so,

    lκ=1H(γ,1)G1(1αγβ). (2.17)

    Similarly, from (2.16), we obtain

    lκ=1H(1,γ)G1(γαβγ). (2.18)

    From (2.17) and (2.18), we arrive at (2.14).

    Conversely, we assume that (2.14) holds. Now, we choose

    B1=1H1/κ(γ,1)[G1(1αγβ)]1/κ and B0=γH1/κ(1,γ)[G1(γαβγ)]1/κ,

    for γR+. Hence, from (2.14), we find

    Φ(B0,B1)=G(H(B0,B1))=G(H(γH1/κ(1,γ)[G1(γαβγ)]1/κ,1H1/κ(γ,1)[G1(1αγβ)]1/κ))=G(1H(γ,1)G1(1αγβ)H(γ,1))=1αγβ.

    Then,

    B1=αB0+βB1Φ(B0,B1)=αγH1/κ(1,γ)[G1(γαβγ)]1/κ+β1αγβ1H1/κ(γ,1)[G1(1αγβ)]1/κ=1H1/κ(γ,1)[G1(1αγβ)]1/κ=B1.

    Similarly, we have that B2=B0. Therefore, Eq (E) has a prime period two solution.

    Theorem 5. Suppose that is even. DE (E) has a prime period two solution if and only if there exists a real number γ>0 such that

    αγ+βγG(γκG1(γαβ))=1, (2.19)

    and this solution is {Sm}m=2 where

    Sm:={H1/κ(1,1)[G1(1αγβγ)]1/κformeven;H1/κ(1,1)[G1(γαβ)]1/κformodd.

    Proof. Suppose that (E) has a prime period two solution {...,l,k,l,k,l,k,...}. It follows from (E) that

    l=αk+βkΦ(k,k) (2.20)
    k=αl+βlΦ(l,l). (2.21)

    From (2.20), we obtain

    1β(lkα)=G(kκH(1,1)),

    and then

    kκ=1H(1,1)G1(1αγβγ). (2.22)

    Similarly, from (2.21), we obtain

    lκ=1H(1,1)G1(γαβ). (2.23)

    Combining (2.17) and (2.18), we arrive at (2.19).

    We omitted the rest of the proof because it is similar to the proof of the previous theorem.

    Remark 1. Equations (1.2)–(1.5) are special cases of Eq (E). Therefore, we can obtain the results for stability and periodicity in [15,16,17,18,19] by imposing different forms for the function Φ and the parameters α and β.

    The genus Tribolium or Tenebrio of darkling beetles includes flour beetles. They are common laboratory animals because they are easy to keep. The flour beetles eat wheat and other grains, can endure even more radiation than cockroaches, and are designed to live in very arid settings [22]. They are a significant pest in the agriculture sector and have a high level of pesticide resistance. These insects are present all over the world and can infest food that has been preserved, which can alter the flavor of the food.

    The larva, pupa, and adult stages of the flour beetle's life cycle are separated by approximately two weeks. The species also shows nonlinear interactions between life stages, such as moving stages cannibalizing non-moving stages. Population dynamics are made possible, which is highly interesting.

    The "Larvae-Pupae-Adult" (LPA) model, which describes the dynamics of flour beetle population dynamics, is one of the most thoroughly studied and well-validated models in mathematical ecology. The following system of three DEs provides the model:

    {Lm+1=kAmexp(μeaLmμelAm)Pm+1=(1ηl)LmAm+1=Pmexp(μpaAm)+(1ηa)Am, (3.1)

    where Lm, Pm, and Am are the number of larvae at time t, the number of individuals in the "P stage" (including non-feeding larvae, pupae, and callow adults) at time t, and the number of sexually mature adults at time t, respectively. k is the rate at which an adult lays eggs. μea and μel are cannibalism coefficients of eggs by larvae and eggs by adults, respectively. Pupae must escape cannibalism by adults μpa to become adults. ηa and ηl are the rates of adult death and naturally larval death, respectively.

    In the simplified case when larval cannibalism of eggs is not present, i.e., μel=0, we observe that the DE

    Bm+1=(1ηa)Bm+k(1ηl)Bm2exp(μeaBm2μpaBm), (3.2)

    represents system (3.1), where ηa, ηl(0,1), k>0, μpa+μel>0, and

    B2=A0;B1=P0exp(μpaA0)+(1ηa)A0;B0 =(1ηl)LμpaA10+(1ηa)A1.

    Now, to apply the results of the previous section, we set that

    κ=1, α=1ηa, β=k(1ηl), G(t)=et, and H(t,s)=μeas+μpat.

    Then, we conclude that the EPs of model (3.2) are p=0 or

    p=1μea+μpaln(k(1ηl)ηa),

    which is positive if k(1ηl)>ηa. Moreover, the stability behavior of EPs is as follows:

    - The trivial EP of (3.2) is LAS if ηa>k(1ηl).

    - The positive EP of (3.2) is LAS if

    |1ηaδμpa|+|ηaδμea|<1, (3.3)

    where

    δ:=ηaμea+μpaln(k(1ηl)ηa).

    - There exists a constant c=1/(eμea) such that sΦ(t,s)c, and then

    limsupmBmk(1ηl)eμeaηa. (3.4)

    - There exists a constant h=1 such that Φ(t,s)h. Then limmBm=0, if ηa>k(1ηl).

    Figure 2 shows the region where local stability occurs for the zero EP of model (3.2). We note that the relationship between the ratio μa1μl and k (the number of eggs laid per adult per unit of time) is the one that controls the stability or instability of the zero EP of model (3.2). We notice that with the increase in rates of adult death and naturally larval death (approaching 1), the system approaches stability, and in the case of a decrease (approaching 0) of these rates, the system turns into instability. As for the instability points, they are of the saddle points if the ratio μa1μl is less than the number of eggs laid per adult per unit of time, and of the nonhyperbolic points if this ratio is equal to k.

    Figure 2.  Local stability region of the zero EP of Model (3.2).

    Lemma 3. Assume that F(t,s)=αt+βsexp(c1sc2t). If β<e(1α) and βc2<eαc1, then Ft  and Fs are non-negative.

    Proof. From (2.5), we have Ftαc2βsexp(c1s)αc2βc1e, which with the fact that βc2<eαc1 gives Ft0. Also, we have that Fs=β(1c1s)exp(c1sc2t), which is positive by using (3.4) and the fact that β<e(1α). The proof is complete.

    Theorem 6. If

    ηa<k(1ηl)<min{eηa,e(1ηa)μeaμpa}, (3.5)

    then the positive EP of (3.2) is GAS.

    Proof. It is easy to notice that Lemmas 1 and 3 guarantee the conditions of global stability in Theorem 1.4.1 in [21].

    Corollary 1. Model (3.2) has a prime period two solution if and only if there exists a positive real number γ such that

    (k(1ηl)γ1+ηa)γ=k(1ηl)γ1(1ηa)γ,

    and this solution is {Sm}m=2 where

    Sm:={1μea+μpaln(k(1ηl)γ1(1ηa)γ)formeven;1μea+μpaln(k(1ηl)γ1+ηa)formodd.

    Remark 2. Kuang and Cushing [23] and Brozak et al. [24] presented the global stability results for model (3.1). The previous global stability results agree with the results presented in [23,24] but the results in [23,24] do not provide any information about the periodicity of the solutions of model (3.1).

    Here, we provide some numerical examples that support the results in the previous sections.

    Example 1. Consider the Baleen Whales model

    Bm+1=(1β)Bm+βBm(1+η(1(BmM)κ))+, (4.1)

    where β(0,1), and η,M(0,). Note that Φ(t,s)=G(H(t,s)), where

    H(t,s)=(sM)κ and G(u)=(1+η(1u))+.

    The positive EP of (4.1) p=M is asymptotically stable if κη<2, see Figure 3a. We notice in this example that the EP is not affected by the parameters κ, β, and η, which means that the EP will remain constant no matter how the values of these parameters change, as is clear from Figure 3a. In Figure 3b, we note that Eq (4.1) has the prime period two solution {...,6,12,6,12,...} when κ=1, =2, β=0.5, η=5, and M=10, as Theorem 5 indicates. We also notice that any slight change in the initial conditions causes a defect in the periodic solution of the equation.

    Figure 3.  Some numerical solutions to Eq (4.1).

    Example 2. Consider the DE

    Bm+1=αBm+βBma+BmBm, (4.2)

    where β,a(0,) and α,B,B+1,...,B0[0,). Note that Φ(t,s)=G(H(t,s)), where

    H(t,s)=ts and G(u)=1a+u.

    Zero EP of Eq (4.2) is LAS if αa+β<a. Moreover, it is easy to notice that 0<Φ(t,s)1a. Then, it follows from Theorem 2 that zero EP of (4.2) is GAS if αa+β<a. Figure 4a shows a set of stable solutions to Eq (4.2). We notice that stability is not affected by the initial data as long as the condition αa+β<a is satisfied.

    Figure 4.  Some numerical solutions to Eq (4.2).

    The positive EP of (4.2) is

    p=β1αa,whereaα+β>a,

    which is LAS if

    |αβλ(a+λ)2|+|1αβλ(a+λ)2|<1.

    In Figure 4b, we see that some solutions to Eq (4.2) are stable with different initial data; this is consistent with condition (2.9).

    Example 3. Consider the flour beetle model (3.2) when ηa=ηl=0.5, and μea=μpa=1, namely,

    Bm+1=12Bm+12kBm2exp(Bm2Bm). (4.3)

    Figure 5a shows two solutions of (3.2), one of which is stable (when k=2) and the other is unstable (when k=300); this supports the validity of condition (3.3). Figure 5b shows a periodic solution of Eq (4.3) when k=100, as Theorem 5 indicates.

    Figure 5.  Some numerical solutions to Eq (4.3).

    In biology, DEs are frequently employed as mathematical representations of actual biological phenomena. In this work, we examined the qualitative characteristics of solutions to a general model of DEs, with the flour beetle model serving as a particular example. We studied the periodic behavior of the solutions to this model, as well as boundedness and stability. The numerical examples that are provided validate the findings and show how the solutions for the model under study behave. As an interesting future research point, we propose to study the oscillatory and bifurcation behavior of the general model studied. We also hope in the future to be able to obtain similar results that include cases where κ is negative, as well as to study the existence of periodic solutions with period three and the global stability of periodic solutions.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research and Libraries in Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University for funding this research work through the Research Group project, Grant No. (RG-1445-0039).

    The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] E. Ahmed, A. S. Hegazi, A. S. Elgazzar, On difference equations motivated by modelling the heart, Nonlinear Dyn., 46 (2006), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-005-9006-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-005-9006-8
    [2] S. A. Kuruklis, G. Ladas, Oscillations and global attractivity in a discrete delay logistic model, Q. Appl. Math., 50 (1992), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1162273 doi: 10.1090/qam/1162273
    [3] X. Liu, A note on the existence of periodic solutions in discrete predator–prey models, Appl. Math. Modell., 34 (2010), 2477–2483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.11.012 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.11.012
    [4] O. Moaaz, Comment on "New method to obtain periodic solutions of period two and three of a rational difference equation" [Nonlinear Dyn 79:241–250], Nonlinear Dyn., 88 (2017), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3293-0 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3293-0
    [5] E. C. Pielou, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1969.
    [6] M. L. Maheswari, K. S. K. Shri, E. M. Elsayed, Multipoint boundary value problem for a coupled system of psi-Hilfer nonlinear implicit fractional differential equation, Nonlinear Anal.-Model. Control, 28 (2023), 1138–1160. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2023.28.33474 doi: 10.15388/namc.2023.28.33474
    [7] E. M. Elsayed, Q. Din, Larch Budmoth Interaction: Stability, bifurcation and chaos control, Dyn. Syst. Appl., 32 (2023), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.46719/dsa2023.32.12 doi: 10.46719/dsa2023.32.12
    [8] E. M. Elsayed, B. S. Alofi, The periodic nature and expression on solutions of some rational systems of difference equations, Alexandria Eng. J., 74 (2023), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.026 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.026
    [9] I. M. Alsulami, E. M. Elsayed, On a class of nonlinear rational systems of difference equations, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 15466–15485. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023789 doi: 10.3934/math.2023789
    [10] A. S. Kurbanli, On the behavior of solutions of the system of rational difference equations, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2011 (2011), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/932362 doi: 10.1155/2011/932362
    [11] A. Khaliq, H. S. Alayachi, M. S. M. Noorani, A. Q. Khan, On stability analysis of higher-order rational difference equation, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2020 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3094185 doi: 10.1155/2020/3094185
    [12] W. Wang, H. Feng, On the dynamics of positive solutions for the difference equation in a new population model, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 9 (2016), 1748–1754. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.009.04.30 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.009.04.30
    [13] T. Sun, H. Xi, Global behavior of the nonlinear difference equation xn+1=f(xns,xnt), J. Math. Anal. Appl., 311 (2005), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.059 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.059
    [14] V. L. Kocic, G. Ladas, Global Behavior of Nonlinear Difference Equations of Higher Order with Applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1703-8
    [15] M. A. E. Abdelrahman, G. E. Chatzarakis, T. Li, O. Moaaz, On the difference equation xn+1= axnl+ bxnk+ f(xnl,xnk), Adv. Differ. Equations, 2018 (2018), 431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1880-8 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1880-8
    [16] M. A. E. Abdelrahman, On the difference equation zm+1= f(zm,zm1,...,zmk), J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 13 (2019), 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2019.1678866 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1678866
    [17] O. Moaaz, Dynamics of difference equation xn+1= f(xnl,xnk), Adv. Differ. Equations, 2018 (2018), 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1896-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1896-0
    [18] O. Moaaz, D. Chalishajar, O. Bazighifan, Some qualitative behavior of solutions of general class of difference equations, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7070585 doi: 10.3390/math7070585
    [19] O. Moaaz, G. E. Chatzarakis, D. Chalishajar, O. Bazighifan, Dynamics of general class of difference equations and population model with two age classes, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040516 doi: 10.3390/math8040516
    [20] C. P. Simon, L. Blume, Mathematics for Economists, W. W. Norton & Company, 1994.
    [21] M. R. S. Kulenovic, G. Ladas, Dynamics of Second Order Rational Difference Equations With Open Problems and Conjectures, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420035384
    [22] A. S. Tuncbilek, A. Ayvaz, F. Ozturk, B. Kaplan, Gamma radiation sensitivity of larvae and adults of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst, J. Pest Sci., 76 (2003), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-003-0002-9 doi: 10.1007/s10340-003-0002-9
    [23] Y. Kuang, J. M. Cushing, Global stability in a nonlinear difference-delay equation model of flour beetle population growth, J. Differ. Equations Appl., 2 (1996), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236199608808040 doi: 10.1080/10236199608808040
    [24] S. Brozak, S. Peralta, T. Phan, J. Nagy, Y. Kuang, Dynamics of an LPAA model for Tribolium growth: Insights into population chaos, SIAM J. Appl. Math., in press, 2024.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(627) PDF downloads(26) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog