Regularity criterion of three dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation

Yazhou Wang; Yuzhu Wang; Yazhou Wang; Yuzhu Wang

doi:10.3934/era.2024199

Electronic Research Archive

2024, Volume 32, Issue 7: 4416-4432. doi: 10.3934/era.2024199

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Regularity criterion of three dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation

Yazhou Wang ,
Yuzhu Wang ^,

School of Mathematics and Statistics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450011, China

Received: 16 March 2024 Revised: 24 May 2024 Accepted: 27 June 2024 Published: 11 July 2024

In this paper, we investigate the regularity criterion of weak solutions to three-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation. A regularity criterion is established via the third component of the velocity fields, the micro-rotational velocity fields, and the magnetic fields.

Keywords:

Citation: Yazhou Wang, Yuzhu Wang. Regularity criterion of three dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4416-4432. doi: 10.3934/era.2024199

Related Papers:

[1]	Jens Lorenz, Wilberclay G. Melo, Suelen C. P. de Souza . Regularity criteria for weak solutions of the Magneto-micropolar equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1625-1639. doi: 10.3934/era.2020083
[2]	Hua Qiu, Zheng-An Yao . The regularized Boussinesq equations with partial dissipations in dimension two. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(4): 1375-1393. doi: 10.3934/era.2020073
[3]	Zhi-Ying Sun, Lan Huang, Xin-Guang Yang . Exponential stability and regularity of compressible viscous micropolar fluid with cylinder symmetry. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 861-878. doi: 10.3934/era.2020045
[4]	Changjia Wang, Yuxi Duan . Well-posedness for heat conducting non-Newtonian micropolar fluid equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(2): 897-914. doi: 10.3934/era.2024043
[5]	Jinheng Liu, Kemei Zhang, Xue-Jun Xie . The existence of solutions of Hadamard fractional differential equations with integral and discrete boundary conditions on infinite interval. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2286-2309. doi: 10.3934/era.2024104
[6]	Noelia Bazarra, José R. Fernández, Ramón Quintanilla . Numerical analysis of a problem in micropolar thermoviscoelasticity. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(2): 683-700. doi: 10.3934/era.2022036
[7]	Xiaojie Yang, Hui Liu, Haiyun Deng, Chengfeng Sun . Pullback $ \mathcal{D} $-attractors of the three-dimensional non-autonomous micropolar equations with damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(1): 314-334. doi: 10.3934/era.2022017
[8]	Wenlong Sun . The boundedness and upper semicontinuity of the pullback attractors for a 2D micropolar fluid flows with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(3): 1343-1356. doi: 10.3934/era.2020071
[9]	Haibo Cui, Junpei Gao, Lei Yao . Asymptotic behavior of the one-dimensional compressible micropolar fluid model. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(2): 2063-2075. doi: 10.3934/era.2020105
[10]	José Luis Díaz Palencia, Saeed Ur Rahman, Saman Hanif . Regularity criteria for a two dimensional Erying-Powell fluid flowing in a MHD porous medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 3949-3976. doi: 10.3934/era.2022201

Abstract

1. Introduction

In this paper, we consider the three-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation

$\begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} { \partial_{t}u+\mu (-\Delta)^{\alpha} u-\chi\Delta u+u\cdot\nabla u-b\cdot\nabla b+\nabla p-2\chi\nabla\times v = 0, }\\ { \partial_{t}v+\eta (-\Delta)^{\beta} v-\kappa\nabla\nabla\cdot v+4\chi v+u\cdot\nabla v-2\chi\nabla\times u = 0, }\\ { \partial_{t}b+\lambda (-\Delta)^{\gamma} b+u\cdot\nabla b-b\cdot\nabla u = 0, }\\ { \nabla\cdot u = 0, \nabla\cdot b = 0, }\\ \end{array} \right. \end{equation}$

(1.1)

with an initial value

$\begin{equation} t = 0: u = u_0(x), \; \; v = v_0(x), \; \; b = b_0(x), \; \; x\in \mathbb{R}^{3}. \end{equation}$

(1.2)

Here $u = u(x, t)$ , $v = v(x, t)$ , $b = b(x, t)\in \mathbb{R}^{3}$ , and $p = p(x, t)\in \mathbb{R}$ are the velocity, micro-rotational velocity, magnetic fields, and scalar pressure, respectively. $\mu$ , $\chi$ , and $\frac{1}{\lambda}$ represent the kinematic viscosity, vortex viscosity, and magnetic Reynolds number, respectively. $\eta$ and $\kappa$ are angular viscosities. $\alpha$ , $\beta$ and $\gamma$ are the parameters of the fractional dissipations corresponding to the velocity, micro-rotational velocity and magnetic field, respectively. The fractional Laplace operator $(-\Delta)^\alpha$ is defined through the Fourier transform as

$\begin{equation*} \widehat{(-\Delta)^\alpha f}(\xi) = \widehat{\Lambda ^{2\alpha }f} = |\xi|^{2\alpha}\hat f(\xi). \end{equation*}$

The incompressible magneto-micropolar fluid equations have made analytic studies a great challenge but offer new opportunities due to their distinctive mathematical features. Regularity criteria for weak solutions are established by Fan and Zhong ^[1] in pointwise multipliers for $1\leq \alpha = \beta = \gamma\leq \frac{5}{4}$ . Local and global well-posedness have been established in ^[2,3,4], respectively. For $\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 1$ , we refer to ^[5,6,7] for the existence of strong solutions and weak solutions, respectively. In the study field of the magneto-micropolar fluid equations, regularity criteria for weak solutions and blow-up criteria for smooth solutions are very important topics. The readers may refer to regularity criteria of weak solutions in Morrey-Campanato space ^[8], in Lorentz space ^[9], Besov space ^[10], Triebel-Lizorkin space ^[11] and other regularity criteria for weak solutions ^{[12,13,14,15]}, and ^[16,17] for blow-up criteria of smooth solutions in different function spaces, respectively. Serrin-type regularity criteria for weak solutions via the velocity fields and the gradient of the velocity field were established in Yuan ^[13], respectively. We may refer to ^[18,19,20] for global well-posedness. On the other hand, the global regularity of weak solutions to (1.1) with partial viscosities becomes more complex. In the case of 2D, we may refer to ^{[22,23,24,25]}, and in the case of 3D, we may refer to ^[26,27].

If $v = 0$ and $\chi = 0$ , then (1.1) reduces to MHD equations with fractional dissipation. The MHD equations govern the dynamics of the velocity and magnetic fields in electrically conducting fluids such as plasmas, liquid metals, and salt water. We only recall regularity criteria for our purpose. If $\alpha, \beta > \frac{5}{4}$ , some regularity criteria have been established by Wu ^[28,29], which are given in terms of the velocity $u$ . If $1\leq \alpha = \beta\leq \frac{3}{2}$ , Zhou ^[30] obtained the Serrin-type criteria $u\in L^p_TL^q_x$ with $\frac{2\alpha}{p}+\frac{3}{q}\leq 2\alpha-1$ and $\frac{3}{2\alpha-1} < q\leq\infty$ . Later, Yuan ^[14] extended the above function space $L^q$ to $B^s_{q, \infty}$ . Recently, the regularity criterion involving $u_3, b \in L^\omega_TL^q_x$ is given in ^[31]. We also refer to ^[32,33] for well-posedness and ^[34] for blow up criterion of smooth solutions.

Motivated by the Serrin-type regularity criterion of weak solutions to Navier-Stokes equations ^[35,36] and MHD equations ^[30,31]. The main purpose is to investigate the regularity criterion of weak solutions to the systems (1.1) and (1.2) in this paper and establish the Serrin-type regularity criterion of weak solutions involving partial components. We state our main result as follows:

Theorem 1.1. Let $1\le\alpha = \beta = \gamma \le \frac{3}{2}$ and $\chi, \kappa\geq 0$ . Assume that $(u_0, v_0, b_0)\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and $\nabla\cdot u_0 = \nabla\cdot b_0 = 0$ . Furthermore, if

$\begin{equation*} u_3, v, b \in L^{\varrho} (0, T;L^{q}(\mathbb{R}^3)), \end{equation*}$

with

$\begin{equation} \frac{2\alpha }{\varrho} + \frac{3}{q} \le \frac{3}{4} (2\alpha-1 )+\frac{3(1-\epsilon )}{4q}, \ \ \frac{3+\epsilon }{2\alpha -1} < q\le \infty , \ \ 0 < \epsilon\le \frac{1}{3}, \end{equation}$

(1.3)

then the solution $(u, v, b)$ to the systems (1.1) and (1.2) remains smooth on $\big [0, T \big]$ .

Remark 1.2. Since the concrete values of the constants $\mu$ , $\eta$ , and $\lambda$ play no role in our proof, for this reason, we shall assume them to be all equal to one throughout this paper. For convenience of description, we define horizontal derivatives $\nabla_h: = (\partial_{1}, \partial_{2})$ .

Remark 1.3. When $v = 0$ and $\chi = 0$ , the conclusion in Theorem 1.1 is reduced to the one in ^[31].

Remark 1.4. Compared with ^[31], the main difficulty in this paper comes from the nonlinear term $u\cdot\nabla v$ . In order to overcome the difficulty caused by the nonlinear term, owing to the energy functional (see (2.2)), we first use integrating by parts and $\nabla\cdot u = 0$ to transform it into a control of the horizontal derivative, and then use Hölder's inequality, multiplicative Sobolev inequality, the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, and Young's inequality to control the nonlinear term.

2. Proof of main result

In this section, our main purpose is to complete the proof of Theorem 1.1. To this end, we introduce the following lemma:

Lemma 2.1. (^[37]) The multiplicative Sobolev inequality

$\begin{equation} \|\nabla u\|_{L^{3q}}\le C\|\partial_1\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{3}} \|\partial_2\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{3}} \|\partial_3\nabla u\|_{L^q}^{\frac{1}{3}}, \ \ 1\le q < \infty, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

holds.

In what follows, we prove Theorem 1.1.

Proof. Let

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} E(t) : = & \|\nabla _hu(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hv(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hb(t)\|_{L^2}^2+ \int_0^t(\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ & \|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau+ \kappa\int_0^t\|\nabla _h \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.2)

The proof is divided into two cases: $\frac{3+\epsilon }{2\alpha -1} < q < \infty$ and $q = \infty$ . We first consider the case $\frac{3+\epsilon }{2\alpha -1} < q < \infty$ .

Taking the inner product of the first three equations of (1.1) with $(u, v, b)$ , and adding them up, using integrating by parts, the divergence-free condition, and Cauchy inequality, we obtain

$\begin{equation*} \label{5} \begin{split} & \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\|u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|b(t)\|_{L^2}^2) +\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } v(t)\|_{L^2}^2 \\ & +\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla\cdot v(t)\|_{L^2}^2 \leq 0. \end{split} \end{equation*}$

Integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ and then obtaining

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} & \|u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|b(t)\|_{L^2}^2 +2\int^t_0(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2 \\ & +\|\Lambda ^{\alpha } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau \leq \|u_0\|_{L^2}^2+\|v_0\|_{L^2}^2+\|b_0\|_{L^2}^2. \end{split} \end{equation*}$

By multiplying the first three equations of (1.1) by $\Delta_hu$ , $\Delta_hv$ , and $\Delta_hb$ , respectively, and adding them up, using integrating by parts and the divergence-free condition, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\|\nabla _hu(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hv(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hb(t)\|_{L^2}^2) +\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } v(t)\|_{L^2}^2 \\ && +\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla _h \nabla\cdot v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\chi\|\nabla _h\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+ 4\chi\|\nabla _hv\|_{L^2}^2 \\ & : = & \sum\limits_{i = 1}^6I_i, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

where

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{} I_1 & = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla u)\cdot\Delta_hu\;dx, \\ I_2& = &-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(b\cdot\nabla b)\cdot\Delta_hu\;dx, \\ I_3& = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla b)\cdot\Delta_hb\;dx, \\ I_4& = &-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(b\cdot\nabla u)\cdot\Delta_hb\;dx, \\ I_5& = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla v)\cdot\Delta_hv\;dx, \\ I_6& = &-2\chi \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}[(\nabla \times v)\cdot\Delta_h u + (\nabla \times u) \cdot\Delta_h v]\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

Thanks to integration by parts and Cauchy's inequality, we arrive at

$\begin{eqnarray} I_6 & = & 4\chi\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \nabla_h(\nabla \times u) \cdot \nabla_h v\;dx \\ &\leq & \chi\|\nabla_h (\nabla \times u)\|^2_{L^2}+4\chi\|\nabla_hv\|^2_{L^2} \\ & = & \chi\|\nabla_h \nabla u\|^2_{L^2}+4\chi\|\nabla_hv\|^2_{L^2}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.4)

For $I_1$ , we divide it into the following three items: $I_{1i}(i = 1, 2, 3)$ as

$\begin{eqnarray} I_1 & = & \sum\limits_{j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j u_k\Delta_hu_k\;dx +\sum\limits_{j = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j u_3\Delta_hu_3\;dx+ \\ && \sum\limits_{k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_3\partial_3 u_k\Delta_hu_k\;dx \\ &: = & I_{11}+ I_{12}+ I_{13}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.5)

The divergence-free condition and integration by parts entail that

$\begin{eqnarray} I_{11}& = &\sum\limits_{i, j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j u_k\partial^2_{ii}u_k\;dx\\& = & -\sum\limits_{i, j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{i}u_j\partial_j u_k\partial_{i}u_k\;dx+\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i, j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{j}u_j|\partial_i u_k|^2\;dx\\& = & -\sum\limits_{i, j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{i}u_j\partial_j u_k\partial_{i}u_k\;dx-\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3|\partial_i u_k|^2\;dx\\& = & -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{1}u_1\partial_1 u_1\partial_{1}u_1\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{1}u_1\partial_1 u_2\partial_{1}u_2\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{1}u_2\partial_2 u_1\partial_{1}u_1\;dx\\&&-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{1}u_2\partial_2 u_2\partial_{1}u_2\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{2}u_1\partial_1 u_1\partial_{2}u_1\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{2}u_1\partial_1 u_2\partial_{2}u_2\;dx\\&&-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{2}u_2\partial_2 u_1\partial_{2}u_1\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{2}u_2\partial_2 u_2\partial_{2}u_2\;dx-\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3|\partial_i u_k|^2\;dx\\& = & -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{1}u_1\partial_1 u_1\partial_{1}u_1\;dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{2}u_2\partial_2 u_2\partial_{2}u_2\;dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3\partial_2 u_1\partial_{2}u_1\;dx\\&&+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3\partial_1 u_2\partial_{1}u_2\;dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3\partial_2 u_1\partial_{1}u_2\;dx-\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_{3}u_3|\partial_i u_k|^2\;dx\\& = & \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_3 u_3\partial_k u_j\partial_k u_j\;dx -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_3 u_3\partial_1 u_1\partial_2 u_2\;dx +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_3 u_3\partial_2 u_1\partial_1 u_2\;dx \\& = & -\sum\limits_{j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u_3\partial_{3k}^{2} u_j\partial_k u_j\;dx +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u_3(\partial_{32}^{2} u_2\partial_1 u_1+\partial_{31}^{2} u_1 \partial_2 u_2)\;dx \\&& -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u_3(\partial_{32}^{2} u_1\partial_1 u_2+\partial_{31}^{2} u_2 \partial_2 u_1)\;dx, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} I_{12} = - \sum\limits_{j = 1}^3\sum\limits_{l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_l u_j\partial_j u_3\partial_l u_3\;dx = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^3\sum\limits_{l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_l u_j u_3\partial_{jl}^{2} u_3\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.7)

Therefore, we obtain

$\begin{equation} |I_1|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |u_3||\nabla u||\nabla_h\nabla u|\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.8)

From Hölder's inequality, Lemma 2.1, the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, and Young's inequality, it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} |I_1| &\leq & C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |u_3||\nabla u||\nabla_h\nabla u|\;dx \\ &\leq & C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^{\theta _1}} \|\nabla_h\nabla u\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \\ &\leq & C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla_h\nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{3} } \| \Delta u\|_{L^{\frac{\theta _1}{3} } }^{\frac{1}{3} } \|\nabla_h\nabla u\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \\ &\leq & C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla_h u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} }\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\| \nabla_h u\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }\\ &\leq & C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} }\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }\\ &\leq& C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3}\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1} u\|_{L^{2}}^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3 } \\ &\leq & C\big[ \|u_3\|_{L^{q}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3 } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1} u\|_{L^{2}}^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} } \big]^{m^{\prime }} +\frac{1}{6}\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{(\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3 )m}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.9)

where the constants $1 < \theta _1, \theta _2, m, m^{\prime } < \infty$ and $0\le s_1, s_2, s_3\le1$ satisfy

$\begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} { \frac{1}{\theta _1} + \frac{1}{\theta _2}+\frac{1}{q} = 1, }\\ { 2-\frac{3}{2} = \big(1-\frac{3}{2}\big) s_1+\big(1+\alpha-\frac{3}{2}\big) \big(1-s_1\big), }\\ { 2-\frac{3}{\theta_1/3} = \big(1-\frac{3}{2}\big) s_2+\big(1+\alpha-\frac{3}{2}\big)\big(1-s_2\big), }\\ { 2-\frac{3}{\theta_2} = \big(1-\frac{3}{2}\big) s_3+\big(1+\alpha-\frac{3}{2}\big)\big(1-s_3\big), }\\ { \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{m^{\prime }} = 1, }\\ { \big(\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3\big)m = 2.} \end{array} \right. \end{equation}$

(2.10)

Noting that $1\le\alpha\le\dfrac{3}{2}$ and $\frac{3+\epsilon }{2\alpha -1} < q\le \infty$ , one solution to (2.10) can be written as

$\begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} { \theta _1 = \frac{18q}{5q-18\epsilon}, }\\ { \theta _2 = \frac{18q}{13q-18(1-\epsilon)}, }\\ { s _1 = 1-\frac{1}{\alpha}, }\\ { s _2 = 1-\frac{9\epsilon}{\alpha q}, }\\ { s _3 = 1-\frac{1}{3\alpha}-\frac{3(1-\epsilon)}{\alpha q}, }\\ { m = \frac{2\alpha q}{q+3(1-\epsilon)}, }\\ { m^{\prime } = \frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}.} \end{array} \right. \end{equation}$

(2.11)

To bound $I_3$ , we decompose it into three pieces as

$\begin{eqnarray} I_3& = &\sum\limits_{j, k = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j b_k\Delta_hb_k\;dx +\sum\limits_{j = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j b_3\Delta_hb_3\;dx+\sum\limits_{k = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_3\partial_3 b_k\Delta_h b_k\;dx \\&: = & I_{31}+ I_{32}+ I_{33}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.12)

By using integrating by parts (see^[31]), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} I_{31}& = & \sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{ll}^{2} u_j\partial_j b_k b_k +\partial_l u_j\partial_{lj}^{2} b_k b_k\big]\;dx - \\ && \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{lj}^{2} u_j\partial_l b_k b_k +\partial_j u_j\partial_{ll}^{2} b_k b_k\big]\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.13)

Similarly, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} I_{32} & = & \sum\limits_{j, l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{ll}^{2} u_j\partial_j b_3 b_3 +\partial_l u_j\partial_{lj}^{2} b_3 b_3\big]\;dx -\\ && \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{lj}^{2} u_j\partial_l b_3 b_3 +\partial_j u_j\partial_{ll}^{2} b_3 b_3\big]\;dx, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.14)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} I_{33} & = & \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3 \sum\limits_{l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{3l}^{2} u_3\partial_l b_k b_k +\partial_l u_3\partial_{3l}^{2} b_k b_k\big]\;dx +\\ && \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3\sum\limits_{j, l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \big[\partial_{lj}^{2} u_j\partial_l b_k b_k +\partial_j u_j\partial_{ll}^{2} b_k b_k\big]\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.15)

Collecting (2.13)–(2.15), it is easy to derive that

$\begin{equation} |I_3|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(|\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla b|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.16)

Furthermore, we have

$\begin{equation} |I_2+I_3+I_4|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(|\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla b|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.17)

Similar to (2.13), it follows from Hölder's inequality, Lemma 2.1, Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, and Young's inequality that

$\begin{eqnarray} && |I_2+I_3+I_4| \\ &\le& C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(|\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla b|)\;dx \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\| |\nabla u|+|\nabla b|\|_{L^{\theta _1}} \||\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla b|\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\big(\| \nabla_h\nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{3} } \| \Delta u\|_{L^{\frac{\theta _1}{3} } }^{\frac{1}{3} } +\| \nabla_h\nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{3} } \| \Delta b\|_{L^{\frac{\theta _1}{3} } }^{\frac{1}{3} }\big)\cdot\\ && \quad \big(\|\nabla_h\nabla u\|_{L^{\theta _2}}+\|\nabla_h\nabla b\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \big) \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\Big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} } \| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} } + \\ && \quad\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} } \| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\Big)\cdot \\ && \quad \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }\big) \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } +\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} }\big) \big(\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} }+\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} }\big)\cdot \\ &&\quad \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} }\big) \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\big)\cdot \\ &&\quad \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 }\big) \big(\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }+\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }\big) \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3 } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{1-s_2}{3}}\cdot \\ &&\quad \big(\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3}\\ &\le& C\big [ \|b\|_{L^{q}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3 } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} } \big ]^{m^{\prime}}+\\ &&\quad \frac{1}{6}\big(\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b\|_{L^{2}}\big)^{\big(\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3 \big)m}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.18)

where the constants $1 < \theta _1, \theta _2, m, m^{\prime } < \infty$ and $0\le s_1, s_2, s_3\le1$ satisfy (2.10).

Similar to $I_3$ , we bound $I_5$ as

$\begin{equation} |I_5|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |v|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla v|)(|\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla v|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.19)

Using the same steps as (2.18), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{22} |I_5| &\le& C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |v|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla v|)(|\nabla_h\nabla u|+|\nabla_h\nabla v|)\;dx \\ &\le& C\big [ \|v\|_{L^{q}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3 } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} } \big ]^{m^{\prime}}+\\ &&\quad \frac{1}{6}\big(\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } v\|_{L^{2}}\big)^{\big(\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+1-s_3 \big)m}, \end{eqnarray}$

where the constants $1 < \theta _1, \theta _2, m, m^{\prime } < \infty$ and $0\le s_1, s_2, s_3\le1$ satisfy (2.10).

Combining (2.3), (2.4), (2.9), (2.18), and (2.20), we arrive at

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\frac{d}{dt}(\|\nabla _hu(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hv(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _hb(t)\|_{L^2}^2) +\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ && \|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla _h\Lambda ^{\alpha } b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla _h \nabla\cdot v(t)\|_{L^2}^2\\ &\le& C\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}} \| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2\big((2\alpha-1) q-3\big)}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}} \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{6\epsilon }{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)} } +\\ && \|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2\big((2\alpha-1) q-3\big)}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)} } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{6\epsilon }{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)} }+\\ && \|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2\big((2\alpha-1) q-3\big)}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)} } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{6\epsilon }{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)} }\\ &\le& C\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\\ && \| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2\big((2\alpha-1) q-3\big)}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{6\epsilon }{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.20)

Set

$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{lll} { \Theta_1 = \frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}, }\\ { \Theta_2 = \frac{2\big((2\alpha-1) q-3\big)}{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}, }\\ { \Theta_3 = \frac{6\epsilon }{(2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)}.} \end{array} \end{equation}$

(2.21)

Integrating (2.20) with respect to $t$ , we obtain

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} E(t) &\le CJ_0+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_1} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\\ & \quad \| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\Theta_2}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\Theta_3}d\tau, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.22)

where $J_0 = \|\nabla u(0)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(0)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(0)\|_{L^2}^2$ .

By taking the inner product of the first three equations of (1.1) with $(-\Delta u, -\Delta v, -\Delta b)$ and integrating by parts, the divergence-free condition, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} && \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2) +\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 }u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 }v(t)\|_{L^2}^2 +\\ && \|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\chi\|\nabla \nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+ 4\chi\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2\\ &: = & \sum\limits_{i = 1}^6J_i, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.23)

where

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{} J_1& = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla u)\cdot\Delta u\;dx, \\ J_2& = &-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(b\cdot\nabla b)\cdot\Delta u\;dx, \\ J_3& = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla b)\cdot\Delta b\;dx, \\ J_4& = &-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(b\cdot\nabla u)\cdot\Delta b\;dx, \\ J_5& = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(u\cdot\nabla v)\cdot\Delta v\;dx, \\ J_6& = &-2\chi \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}[(\nabla \times v)\cdot\Delta u + (\nabla \times u) \cdot\Delta v]\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

By integration by parts and Cauchy's inequality, we arrive at

$\begin{eqnarray} J_6 & = & 4\chi\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \nabla(\nabla \times u) \cdot \nabla v\;dx \\ &\leq& \chi\|\nabla (\nabla \times u)\|^2_{L^2}+4\chi\|\nabla v\|^2_{L^2} \\ & = & \chi\|\nabla \nabla u\|^2_{L^2}+4\chi\|\nabla v\|^2_{L^2}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.24)

For $J_1$ , we divide it into the following three items: $J_{1i}(i = 1, 2, 3)$

$\begin{eqnarray} J_1 & = &\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_3\partial_3 u\cdot\Delta_hu\;dx +\sum\limits_{j = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_j\partial_j u\cdot\Delta u\;dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_3\partial_3 u\cdot \partial_{33}^{2} u\;dx \\ &: = & J_{11}+ J_{12}+ J_{13}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.25)

Integrating by parts and using the divergence-free condition yields

$\begin{equation} J_{11} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3\sum\limits_{l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_3 u_3\partial_l u_k\partial_l u_k\;dx -\sum\limits_{k = 1}^3\sum\limits_{l = 1}^2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_l u_3\partial_3 u_k\partial_l u_k\;dx, \end{equation}$

(2.26)

$\begin{equation} J_{12} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^3\sum\limits_{k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_j u_j\partial_l u_k\partial_l u_k\;dx -\sum\limits_{j = 1}^2\sum\limits_{k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_l u_j\partial_j u_k\partial_l u_k\;dx, \end{equation}$

(2.27)

and

$\begin{equation} J_{13} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{k = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(\partial_1 u_1+\partial_2 u_2)\partial_3 u_k\partial_3 u_k\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.28)

Therefore, we have

$\begin{equation} |J_1|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |\nabla_h u||\nabla u|^{2}\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.29)

From Hölder's inequality and Lemma 2.1, it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} |J_1| &\le & C\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^4}^{2} \\ &\le& C\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{6} }^{\frac{3}{2\alpha} } \\ &\le& C\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{\alpha} }\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{2\alpha} }. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.30)

By using integrating by parts and the divergence-free condition, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} J_{3} & = & -\sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\partial_l (u_j\partial_j b_k)\partial_l b_k\;dx \\ & = & -\sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} (\partial_l u_j\partial_j b_k\partial_l b_k+u_j\partial_{lj}^{2} b_k\partial_l b_k)\;dx \\ & = & \sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}b_k\partial_l (\partial_lu_j\partial_j b_k)\;dx\\ & = & \sum\limits_{j, k, l = 1}^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} (b_k\partial_{ll}^{2} u_j\partial_j b_k+b_k\partial_l u_j\partial_{jl}^{2} b_k)\;dx. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.31)

Then we arrive at

$\begin{equation} |J_3|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(|\Delta u|+|\Delta b|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.32)

Furthermore, we have

$\begin{equation} |J_2+J_3+J_4|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(\Delta u|+|\Delta b|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.33)

It follows from the same procedure (2.18) that

$\begin{eqnarray} && |J_2+J_3+J_4| \\ &\le& C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |b|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla b|)(|\Delta u|+|\Delta b|)\;dx \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\| |\nabla u|+|\nabla b|\|_{L^{\theta _1}} \||\Delta u|+|\Delta b|\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\big(\| \Delta u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{3} } \| \Delta u\|_{L^{\frac{\theta _1}{3}}}^{\frac{1}{3} } +\| \Delta b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{3} } \| \Delta b\|_{L^{\frac{\theta _1}{3} } }^{\frac{1}{3}}\big) \big(\|\Delta u\|_{L^{\theta _2}}+\|\Delta b\|_{L^{\theta _2}} \big) \\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}\Big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3}} \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} } \| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{\frac{1-s_2}{3}} +\\ && \| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2s_1}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3} } \| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{s_2}{3} } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1-s_2}{3} }\Big)\times \\ && \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{s_3 } \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{1-s_3 }\big) \\ &\le & C\|b\|_{L^{q}} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2s_1}{3}+\frac{s_2}{3}+s_3 } \big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{2(1-s_1)}{3}+\frac{1-s_2}{3}+1-s_3 }\\ &\le& C\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) +\frac{1}{8}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big), \end{eqnarray}$

(2.34)

where the constants $1 < \theta _1, \theta _2, m, m^{\prime } < \infty$ and $0\le s_1, s_2, s_3\le1$ satisfy (2.10).

Similar to $J_3$ , we bound $J_5$ as

$\begin{equation} |J_5|\le C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |v|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla v|)(|\Delta u|+|\Delta v|)\;dx. \end{equation}$

(2.35)

The same procedure leads to (2.34) yields

$\begin{eqnarray} \label{38} |J_5| &\le& C\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |v|(|\nabla u|+|\nabla v|)(|\Delta u|+|\Delta v|)\;dx \\ &\le& C\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}} \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) +\frac{1}{8}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1} v\|_{L^{2}}^{2}\big). \end{eqnarray}$

Combining (2.23), (2.24), (2.30), (2.34), and (2.36), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} && \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2) +\frac{3}{4}(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(t)\|_{L^2}^2)\\ && +\frac{3}{4}\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1}b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(t)\|_{L^2}^2\\ &\le& C(\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}) \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big)+ \\ && C\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{\alpha} }\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.36)

Integrating (2.36) over the interval $(0, t)$ and using Hölder's inequality, it was deduced that

$\begin{eqnarray} && \frac{1}{2}(\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2)+ \frac{3}{4}\int_0^t(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ && \|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau +\int_0^t\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\ &\le& C+ C\int_0^t(\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}) \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) d\tau +\\ && C \int_0^t\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{\alpha} }\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{2\alpha} } d\tau \\ &\le& C+ C\int_0^t(\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}) \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) d\tau+\\ && C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \int_0^t\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{\alpha} }\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{2\alpha} } d\tau. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.37)

From Young's inequality, it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} && C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \int_0^t\| \nabla u\|_{L^2}^{2-\frac{3}{2\alpha}} \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{\alpha} }\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{1}{2\alpha} } d\tau \\ &\le& C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \big[ \int_0^t \| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{1-\frac{3}{4\alpha}} \big[ \int_0^t \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{4\alpha}} \\ &\le& C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \big[ \int_0^t \| u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2\alpha}{1+\alpha}} \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{\frac{2}{1+\alpha}} d\tau\big]^{1-\frac{3}{4\alpha}} \big[ \int_0^t \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{4\alpha}} \\ &\le & C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \big[ \int_0^t \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{4\alpha}+\frac{4\alpha-3}{4\alpha(1+\alpha)}} \\ &\le& C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \big[ \big( \int_0^t \| \nabla_h\Lambda ^{\alpha } u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau\big)^{\frac{1}{2}} +1\big]\big[\big( \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau\big)^{\frac{1}{4}}+1 \big] \\ &\le& CE(t)\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}} \big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+\\ && CE(t)+C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|_{L^{2}}\\ &\le & CE(t)\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\big( \sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|^{2}_{L^{2}}+1 \big) \big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}} +\\ && CE(t)+C\sup\limits_{0\leq\tau\leq t}\|\nabla_h u\|^{2}_{L^{2}}+C \\ &\le& CE(t)\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C \big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1} u\|_{L^{2}}^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+CE(t)+C. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.38)

Then, we have

(2.39)

By using Hölder's inequality, Young's inequality, and (2.22), we deduce that

$\begin{eqnarray} CE(t)&\le& C+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_1}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\\ && \| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\Theta_2}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1} v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\Theta_3} d\tau \\ &\le& C+C\big[ \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\\ && \| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau \big]^{\Theta_2} \big[ \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau\big]^{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_3} \\ &\le& C+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau + \\ && \frac{1}{16} \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.40)

Similarly, it follows from (2.22) and Hölder's inequality and Young's inequality that

$\begin{eqnarray} && CE(t)\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}} \\ &\le& C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}\int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\\ && \|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_1}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\frac{\Theta_2}{2}}\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{\Theta_3}d\tau\\ &\le & C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}\big[ \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\\ && \|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau \big] ^{\frac{\Theta_2}{2}}\big[ \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\\ && \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau\big]^{\frac{\Theta_3}{2}} \\ &\le& C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\big[ \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau\big]^{\frac{2\Theta_3+1}{4}}\cdot \\ &&\big[ \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau \big] ^{\Theta_2}\\ &\le& C\big[ \int_0^t \| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2} d\tau \big]^{\frac{1}{4}}+C\big[ \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau\big]^{\frac{2\Theta_3+1}{4}}\cdot\\ &&\big[ \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_4}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau \big] ^{\frac{3(2\alpha-1)q+3(1-\epsilon)-12}{4\big[ (2\alpha-1)q-3(1-\epsilon)\big] } } \\ &\le& C+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_4}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\\ && \| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau + \frac{1}{16} \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.41)

where $\Theta_4 = \frac{8\alpha q}{3(2\alpha-1)q+3(1-\epsilon)-12}.$

We substitute (2.40) and (2.41) into (2.39) and then use Young's inequality to obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} && \frac{1}{2}(\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2)+\frac{3}{4}\int_0^t(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ &&\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau+\int_0^t\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\ &\le& C+ C\int_0^t(\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}) \big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) d\tau+\\ && C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\Theta_4}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau +\\ && C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha q}{(2\alpha-1)q-3}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau +\\ && \frac{1}{8}\big[ \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2}d\tau\big]\\ &\le& C+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}\big)\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau +\\ && \frac{1}{4} \int_0^t\big(\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b\|_{L^{2} }^{2}+\| \Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v\|_{L^{2} }^{2}\big) d\tau. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.42)

Then we have

$\begin{eqnarray} && \|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ && \|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau+\int_0^t\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\ &\le& C+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}\big)\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2} d\tau. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.43)

Thanks to Gronwall's inequality and condition (1.3), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} && \|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ && \|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau+\int_0^t\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\ &\le& C\exp \big[ C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|b\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}+\|v\|_{L^{q}}^{\Theta_4}\big)d\tau \big] < \infty. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.44)

Finally, we consider the case $q = \infty$ . By repeating the above procedure, we derive that

$\begin{equation*} \label{48} E(t) \le CJ_0+C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{\infty}}+\|b\|_{L^{\infty}}+\|v\|_{L^{\infty}}\big)^{\frac{2\alpha }{2\alpha-1}}\big(\| \nabla u\|_{L^{2} }+\| \nabla b\|_{L^{2}}+\| \nabla v\|_{L^{2} }\big)^{2 }d\tau. \end{equation*}$

Thanks to Gronwall's inequality and condition (1.3), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} && \|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla b(t)\|_{L^2}^2 +\int_0^t(\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } u(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\\ && \|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Lambda ^{\alpha+1 } b(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau +\int_0^t\kappa\|\nabla \nabla\cdot v(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\ &\le& C\exp \big[ C \int_0^t\big(\|u_3\|_{L^{\infty}}^{\frac{8\alpha }{3(2\alpha-1)}}+\|b\|_{L^{\infty}}^{\frac{8\alpha }{3(2\alpha-1)}}+\|v\|_{L^{\infty}}^{\frac{8\alpha }{3(2\alpha-1)}}\big)d\tau\big ] < \infty. \end{eqnarray}$

(2.45)

By the above steps, we establish a higher-order a priori estimate of the solutions, and then we obtain that the higher-order norm of the solutions is bounded, thus proving the smoothness of the solutions. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

3. Conclusions

In this paper, the regularity criterion of the weak solution of the three-dimensional magnetic micropolar fluid equation when $1\le\alpha = \beta = \gamma \le \frac{3}{2}$ is studied. However, the regularity of the weak solution of the magnetic micropolar fluid equation when $1\le\alpha, \beta, \gamma \le \frac{3}{2}$ on $\mathbb{R}^3$ is still an open problem, and it is hoped that the method in this paper can provide inspiration for the solution of this problem.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by [the Basic Research Project of Key Scientific Research Project Plan of Universities in Henan Province (Grant No. 20ZX002)].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	J. Fan, X. Zhong, Regularity criteria for 3D generalized incompressible magneto-micropolar fluid equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 127 (2022), 107840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107840 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107840
[2]	H. Qiu, C. Xiao, Z. Yao, Local existence for the d-dimensional magneto-micropolar equations with fractional dissipation in Besov spaces, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 9617–9651. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9078 doi: 10.1002/mma.9078
[3]	B. Yuan, P. Zhang, Global well-posedness for the 3D magneto-micropolar equations with fractional dissipation, N. Z. J. Math., 51 (2021), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.53733/161 doi: 10.53733/161
[4]	J. Yan, Q. Xie, B. Dong, Global regularity of the 3D magneto-micropolar equations with fractional dissipation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-021-01651-2 doi: 10.1007/s00033-021-01651-2
[5]	E. Ortega-Torres, M.Rojas-Medar, Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: global existence of strong solutions, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 4 (1999), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1085337599000287 doi: 10.1155/S1085337599000287
[6]	M. Rojas-Medar, Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: existence and uniqueness of strong solutions, Math. Nachr., 188 (1997), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.19971880116 doi: 10.1002/mana.19971880116
[7]	M. Rojas-Medar, J. Boldrini, Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: existence of weak solutions, Rev. Mat. Complutense, 11 (1998), 443–460.
[8]	S. Gala, Regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in the Morrey-Campanato space, Nonlinear Differ. Equations Appl., 17 (2010), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-009-0047-4 doi: 10.1007/s00030-009-0047-4
[9]	Z. Li, P. Niu, New regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in Lorentz spaces, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 6056–6066. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7170 doi: 10.1002/mma.7170
[10]	F. Xu, Regularity criterion of weak solution for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in Besov spaces, Commun. Nonlinear. Sci. Numer. Simul., 17 (2012), 2426–2433. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.09.038 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.09.038
[11]	Z. Zhang, Z. Yao, X. Wang, A regularity criterion for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in Triebel-Lizorkin spaces, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 74 (2011), 2220–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NA.2010.11.026 doi: 10.1016/J.NA.2010.11.026
[12]	F. Xu, X. Xu, J. Yuan, Logarithmically improved regularity criteria for the micropolar fluid equations, Appl. Math., 39 (2012), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.4064/am39-3-6 doi: 10.4064/am39-3-6
[13]	B. Yuan, Regularity of weak solutions to magneto-micropolar fluid equations, Acta Math. Sci., 30 (2010), 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0252-9602(10)60139-7 doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(10)60139-7
[14]	S. Yan, X. Chen, Regularity criterion for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid flows in terms of pressure, J. Nonlinear Evol. Equations Appl., 2022 (2023), 127–142.
[15]	Z. Zhang, Regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations via the direction of the velocity, Proc. Math. Sci., 125 (2015), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-015-0213-z doi: 10.1007/s12044-015-0213-z
[16]	Y. Z. Wang, Y. Wang, Blow-up criterion for two-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with partial viscosity, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 34 (2011), 2125–2135. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.1510 doi: 10.1002/mma.1510
[17]	J. Yuan, Existence theorem and blow-up criterion of the strong solutions to the magneto-micropolar fluid equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 31 (2008), 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.967 doi: 10.1002/mma.967
[18]	L. Deng, H. Shang, Global well-posedness for $n$ -dimensional magneto-micropolar equations with hyperdissipation, Appl. Math. Lett., 111 (2021), 106610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106610 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106610
[19]	J. Liu, S. Wang, Initial-boundary value problem for 2D micropolar equations without angular viscosity, Commun. Math. Sci., 16 (2018), 2147–2165. https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2018.v16.n8.a5 doi: 10.4310/CMS.2018.v16.n8.a5
[20]	S. Wang, W. Xu, J. Liu, Initial-boundary value problem for 2D magneto-micropolar equations with zero angular viscosity, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 72 (2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-021-01537-3 doi: 10.1007/s00033-021-01537-3
[21]	H. Lin, S. Liu, H. Zhang, R. Bai, Global regularity of 2D incompressible magneto-micropolar fluid equations with partial viscosity, Acta Math. Sci., 43 (2023), 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-023-0316-z doi: 10.1007/s10473-023-0316-z
[22]	D. Regmi, J. Wu, Global regularity for the 2D magneto-micropolar equations with partial dissipation, J. Math. Study, 49 (2016), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.4208/jms.v49n2.16.05 doi: 10.4208/jms.v49n2.16.05
[23]	H. Shang, J. Zhao, Global regularity for 2D magneto-micropolar equations with only micro-rotational velocity dissipation and magnetic diffusion, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 150 (2017), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2016.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2016.11.011
[24]	H. Shang, C. Gu, Global regularity and decay estimates for 2D magneto-micropolar equations with partial dissipation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 70 (2019), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-019-1129-8 doi: 10.1007/s00033-019-1129-8
[25]	H. Shang, J. Wu, Global regularity for 2D fractional magneto-micropolar equations, Math. Z., 297 (2021), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-020-02532-6 doi: 10.1007/s00209-020-02532-6
[26]	Y. Jia, Q. Xie, B. Dong, Global regularity of the 3D magneto-micropolar equations with fractional dissipation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-021-01651-2 doi: 10.1007/s00033-021-01651-2
[27]	Y. Wang, L. Gu, Global regularity of 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 99 (2020), 105980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.07.011 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.07.011
[28]	J. Wu, Regularity criteria for the generalized MHD equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 33 (2008), 285–306. http://doi.org/10.1080/03605300701382530 doi: 10.1080/03605300701382530
[29]	J. Wu, Global regularity for a class of generalized magnetohydrodynamic equations, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 13 (2011), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-009-0017-y doi: 10.1007/s00021-009-0017-y
[30]	Y. Zhou, Regularity criteria for the generalized viscous MHD equations, Ann. I. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non. Linéaire, 24 (2007), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.03.014 doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.03.014
[31]	J. Wang, W. Tan, Y. Nie, A regularity criterion for the 3D generalized MHD system involving partial components, J. Math. Phys., 64 (2023), 051505. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143742 doi: 10.1063/5.0143742
[32]	Y. Cai, Z. Lei, Global well-posedness of the incompressible Magnetohydrodynamics, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 228 (2018), 969–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1210-4 doi: 10.1007/s00205-017-1210-4
[33]	B. Yuan, J. Zhao, Global regularity of 2D almost resistive MHD equations, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 41 (2018), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.10.006
[34]	Z. Lei, On axially symmetric incompressible Magnetohydrodynamics in three dimensions, J. Differ. Equations, 259 (2015), 3202–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.04.017
[35]	J. Serrin, On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 9 (1962), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253344 doi: 10.1007/BF00253344
[36]	Y. Zhou, A new regularity criterion for weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Pures Appl., 84 (2005), 1496–1514. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2005.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2005.07.003
[37]	C. Cao, Sufficient conditions for the regularity to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 26 (2010), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1141 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1141

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Electronic Research Archive

1 1.3

Metrics

Article views(887) PDF downloads(55) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Electronic Research Archive

Regularity criterion of three dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Proof of main result

3. Conclusions

Use of AI tools declaration

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Proof of main result

3. Conclusions

Use of AI tools declaration

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Electronic Research Archive

Regularity criterion of three dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equations with fractional dissipation

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Proof of main result

3. Conclusions

Use of AI tools declaration

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Proof of main result

3. Conclusions

Use of AI tools declaration

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References