Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Global boundedness of classical solutions to a Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system involving saturated sensitivity and indirect signal production in two dimensions

  • Received: 23 November 2022 Revised: 07 January 2023 Accepted: 16 January 2023 Published: 06 February 2023
  • This paper is concerned with the following Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system with indirect signal production and tensor-valued sensitivity:

    {nt+un=Δn(nS(x,n,v,w)v),xΩ,t>0,vt+uv=Δvv+w,xΩ,t>0,wt+uw=Δww+n,xΩ,t>0,ut+κ(u)u+P=Δu+nϕ,xΩ,t>0,u=0,xΩ,t>0,                                            ()

    in a bounded domain ΩR2 with smooth boundary, where κR, ϕW2,(Ω), and S is a given function with values in R2×2 which satisfies |S(x,v,w,u)|CS(n+1)α with CS>0. If α>0, then for any sufficiently smooth initial data, there exists a globally classical solution which is bounded for the corresponding initial-boundary value problem of system (♡).

    Citation: Kai Gao. Global boundedness of classical solutions to a Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system involving saturated sensitivity and indirect signal production in two dimensions[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1710-1736. doi: 10.3934/era.2023089

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ruchira R N Ghormare, Sana Fatima, Priya Grover, Nidhi Phutela, Vinay Kandpal, Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez . Exploring the paradigm shift towards sustainability: A systematic literature review on circular economy and eco-innovation. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(6): 940-959. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024047
    [2] Filippo Sgroi . Circular economy and environmental protection. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(2): 122-127. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022009
    [3] Manfred Kircher . The bioeconomy needs economic, ecological and social sustainability. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(1): 33-50. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022003
    [4] Chukwuebuka Okafor, Charles Ajaero, Christian Madu, Kingsley Agomuo, Ezekiel Abu . Implementation of circular economy principles in management of end-of-life tyres in a developing country (Nigeria). AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(5): 406-433. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020027
    [5] Pablo Andrés–Meza, Noé Aguilar–Rivera, Isaac Meneses–Márquez, José Luis Del Rosario–Arellano, Gloria Ivette Bolio–López, Otto Raúl Leyva–Ovalle . Cassava cultivation; current and potential use of agroindustrial co–products. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(2): 248-278. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024012
    [6] Afshin Meraj, Tina Shoa, Fereshteh Sadeghi Naieni Fard, Hassan Mina . A comprehensive bi-objective optimization model to design circular supply chain networks for sustainable electric vehicle batteries. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(2): 279-303. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024013
    [7] Carlos Corpus, Ali Zahedi, Eva Selene Hernández-Gress, José-Fernando Camacho-Vallejo . A bi-level optimization model for PET bottle recycling within a circular economy supply chain. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(2): 223-251. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025010
    [8] Serpil Guran . Options to feed plastic waste back into the manufacturing industry to achieve a circular carbon economy. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(5): 341-355. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.5.341
    [9] Simon Bergsma, Efthymios Poulios, Nikolaos Charalampogiannis, Spyridon Achinas . Lactic acid bacteria as bioprotective agents: A mini-review on biotechnological-and human health-based facets. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(2): 206-225. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023012
    [10] Dimitris Banousis, Zacharoula Kyriazi, Tilemachos Bourtzis . Social Economy as a key factor for enhancing Blue Growth in Greece. A conceptual perspective. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(4): 815-826. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.4.815
  • This paper is concerned with the following Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system with indirect signal production and tensor-valued sensitivity:

    {nt+un=Δn(nS(x,n,v,w)v),xΩ,t>0,vt+uv=Δvv+w,xΩ,t>0,wt+uw=Δww+n,xΩ,t>0,ut+κ(u)u+P=Δu+nϕ,xΩ,t>0,u=0,xΩ,t>0,                                            ()

    in a bounded domain ΩR2 with smooth boundary, where κR, ϕW2,(Ω), and S is a given function with values in R2×2 which satisfies |S(x,v,w,u)|CS(n+1)α with CS>0. If α>0, then for any sufficiently smooth initial data, there exists a globally classical solution which is bounded for the corresponding initial-boundary value problem of system (♡).



    Abbreviations: (α, β, γ, η, θ, λ, μ, a, b): Model parameters; R (t): Reliability function; MTBF (τ): the average Lifetime; PV: Photovoltaic; a-Si: Amorphous silicon; pc-Si: Polycrystalline silicon; mc-Si: Single crystalline silicon

    Many articles in literature have studied the degradation of photovoltaic modules when exposed to natural environments using accelerated tests to observe degradation in reality [1,2]. A study confirmed that after 20 years of continuous exposure a matrix of 70 polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic modules has undergone an average performance decay of 0.24% per year in a moderate subtropical climate environment [3,4]. Another study stated that after only one year of exposure in a tropical climate environment the electrical powers of two modules of type (a-Si) and (pc-Si) were degraded to 60% and 56% respectively of their initial values [5]. In addition to these results, another study has shown that some photovoltaic modules (mc-Si and pc-Si) had been degraded by 0.22% /year to 2.96% / year for the maximum power [6]. In the long run, the polycrystalline silicon modules have the best reliability with a degradation rate of 0.41% per year in a natural environment [7]. In a tropical environment (Ghana), the exposure of 14 polycrystalline silicon modules during a 19-year period recorded a degradation rate of 21% to 35% of nominal power [8]. The degradation is in the order of 1.2% per year for polycrystalline silicon modules and 0.8% per year for single crystalline silicon modules [9]. An important study that followed the degradation of 204 modules (123 mc-Si and 81 pc-Si) had revealed a degradation variance from 0 to 6% per year for exposure periods of 18 years to 24 years in a subtropical moderate environment [10]. In Saharan environment (southern Algeria for example) the degradation rate of polycrystalline silicon modules was very high ranging from 3.33% / year to 4.64% / year unlike mono-crystalline silicon modules which recorded a rate of 1.22% / year after 28 years of exposure [11,12]. Accelerated tests cannot evaluate totally the effect of natural environment on electrical and optical characteristics of a photovoltaic module [13]. But it is the only method to see the effect of single factor or limited number of climatic factors [13,14]. The return of experimental data within a period of operation in a natural environment allows to predict the lifetime and the degradation over the long term [15]. Our objective in this study is to search in the literature for an adequate model to simulate the reliability of photovoltaic modules (crystalline silicon) exposed in desert environments in order to probably estimate their degradation at any period of their operation. The method consists of using a genetic algorithm (artificial intelligence optimization method) to estimate the unknown parameters of the models and to check the competence of the simulation by comparing with feedbacks of experimental data.

    Two kinds of methods in the literature are used to predict the duration of good operation and the reliability of a photovoltaic module exposed in a natural environment, the first that uses the return of experiments, or the second that utilizes accelerated tests [16]. In this study, we use the feedback data that are practically measured in the desert of California and in the Algerian Sahara (Adrar region), extracted from references [16,17,18] to estimate the lifespan of photovoltaic modules (single crystalline silicon) in these environments. In order to calculate the parameters of models we will use a genetic algorithm. The iterative stochastic genetic algorithm uses an initial population to reach an optimal solution of any problem [19]. The initially chosen population has evolved from generation to generation where the most suitable individuals have a great chance of breeding. This mechanism of intelligence is realized by respecting the following steps [20,21]:

    1. Creation of an initial population

    2. Assessment of individuals in population

    3. Selection of adapted individuals

    4. Reproduction by crossing and mutation

    5. Formation of a new generation

    This process is circulated until an optimal solution is obtained. Practically, we represent these steps according to the flowchart below (Figure 1):

    Figure 1.  Flowchart of the genetic algorithm.

    Originally, the reliability concerned the high technology systems (nuclear, aerospace...) to guarantee their operational safety. Today, all areas are interested in the study of reliability to make decisions on ratio Cost / gain and to control the failure sources [22,23]. Reliability of a system is a quantity characterizing the safety of operation or measuring the probability of operation of an appliance according to prescribed standards (definition presented in 1962 by the Academy of Sciences). Reliability (or survival function) is expressed by:

    R(t)=rt0h(x)dx (1)

    h(t): Instant failure rate (probability of seeing a failure in a short interval after instant t.

    The average time of operation (lifetime) which is the Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF) is given by:

    MTBF=+0R(t)dt (2)

    According to their instantaneous rates of failure, the parametric reliability models are classified in the literature as follows [24,25,26]:

    1. Models of constant rate: Exponential model.

    2. Models of monotone rate: Weibul model, gamma model, Gompertz-Makeham model, exponential Weibul model, Mix of exponential models.

    3. Models of rates of a bathtub shape: Modified Weibul model, exponential power model, quadratic model, and uniform model.

    4. Models of rate in bell form: Generalized Weibul model, normal model, log-normal model, log logistic model, extreme values model.

    The characteristics of chosen models are presented in the table 1 below:

    Table 1.  Parametric models and their characteristics.
    Model Model of two parameters
    Reliability function Average lifetime
    Exponential model R(t)=eλtwithλ>0 MTBF=1λ
    Weibul model R(t)=e(tη)β;β,η>0 MTBF=ηΓ(1+1/β)
    Gamma model R(t)=11Γ(μ)θt0xμ1exdx;(μ,θ)>0 MTBF=μθ
    Exponential power model R(t)=e1e(λt)αwithα>0;λ,α>0 MTBF=+0e1e(λt)αdt
    Normal model R(t)=112πσ+0e(xμ)22σ2dx MTBF=μ
    Log-normal model R(t)=112πσInte(xμ)22σ2dx MTBF=eμ+σ22
    Log logistic model R(t)=αβαβ+tβorα>0;β>1 MTBF=+0αβαβ+tβdt
    Uniform model R(t)=btba;fort[a,b] MTBF=babtbadt
    Extreme values model R(t)=eα(eβt1)withα>0,β>0 MTBF=+0eα(eβt1)dt
    Gompertz-Makeham model R(t)=eatbInc(ct1) MTBF=+0eatbInc(ct1)dt
    exponential Weibul model R(t)=1{1e(tη)β}μorη,β,μ>0 MTBF=+01{1e(tη)β}μdt
    Mix of exponential models R(t)=a1etθ1+(1a1)etθ2;θ1,θ2>0;0<a1<1 MTBF=a1θ1+(1a1)θ2
    Modified Weibul model R(t)=e(tη)βeμtwith(η;β;μ>0) MTBF=+0e(tη)βeμtdt
    Quadratic model R(t)=e(αt+β2t2+γ3t3)α,γ>0;2γαβ0 MTBF=+0e(αt+β2t2+γ3t3)dt
    Generalized Weibul model R(t)=e1(1+(tη)β)1γwith(η,β,γ)>0 MTBF=+0e1(1+(tη)β)1γdt

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    After filtering we present only the cases where the calculated average error is less than 2%. This choice is solely made to limit the size of the study. The other cases are not interesting as our goal is to visualize the most adequate model having the least error.

    Estimated parameters and simulated reliability graphs are shown below (Table 2, Figures 2 and 3):

    Table 2.  Parameters of modified Weibul model in the two areas.
    In Adrar Sahara In the desert of California
    Parameters model (η, β, μ) (71, 1.35, 0.03) (49, 1.05, 0.01)
    Average lifetime MTBF (years) 28.75 30.47
    Uncertainty 0.0039 0.0059

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Reliability of photovoltaic module in Adrar Sahara by modified Weibul model.
    Figure 3.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in the desert of California by Weibul modified model.

    After 20 years of operation in Adrar region we observe that the Weibul modified model predicts a 30% degradation of starting value of electrical power for this type of photovoltaic modules while the degradation is approximately of 38% in the desert of California.

    In the Table 3 and Figures (4, 5) we present the estimated parameters and the simulated reliability:

    Table 3.  Parameters of generalized Weibul model in the two areas.
    In Adrar Sahara In the desert of California
    Parameters model (η, β, γ) (38, 2.5, 0.5) (77, 1.2, 0.4)
    Average lifetime MTBF (years) 23.45 26.09
    Uncertainty 0.0184 0.0092

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 4.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in Adrar Sahara by generalized Weibul model.
    Figure 5.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in the desert of California by generalized Weibul model.

    In this case the generalized Weibul model predicts a degradation of 35% in Adrar region after 20 years of operation while the degradation is approximately of 44% in the desert of California.

    The Table 4 and the Figures 6, 7 show the estimated parameters and the simulated reliability of PV module:

    Table 4.  Parameters of exponential Weibul model in the two areas.
    In Adrar Sahara In the desert of California
    Parameters model (η, β, μ) (28, 4.05, 0.66) (37, 2.65, 0.45)
    Average lifetime MTBF (years) 22.57 23.40
    Uncertainty 0.0254 0.0028

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 6.  Reliability of photovoltaic module in Adrar Sahara by exponential Weibul model.
    Figure 7.  Reliability of photovoltaic module in the desert of California by exponential Weibul model.

    By this model the degradation is about of 38% in Adrar region after 20 years of operation while the degradation is approximately of 46% in the desert of California.

    Estimated parameters and simulated reliability graphs are shown below (Table 5, Figures 8 and 9):

    Table 5.  Parameters of extreme values model in the two areas.
    In Adrar Sahara In the desert of California
    Parameters model (α, β) (0.015, 0.68) (0.02, 0.9)
    Average lifetime MTBF (years) 50.09 31.99
    Uncertainty 0.0081 0.0227

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 8.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in Adrar Sahara by extreme values model.
    Figure 9.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in the desert of California by extreme values model.

    By model of extreme values, the degradation is about of 22% in Adrar region after 20 years of operation while it is approximately of 37% in the desert of California.

    In this case the estimated parameters and the simulated reliability are shown below (table 6, figure 10 and 11):

    Table 6.  Parameters of uniform model in the two areas.
    In Adrar Sahara In the desert of California
    Parameters model (a, b) (1.6, 77) (0.4, 48)
    Average lifetime MTBF (years) 37.70 23.80
    Uncertainty 0.0074 0.0139

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 10.  Reliability of photovoltaic module in Adrar Sahara by uniform model.
    Figure 11.  Reliability of photovoltaic modules in the desert of California by uniform model.

    Finally, the uniform model predicts a degradation of 24% in Adrar region After 20 years of operation while it is approximately of 41% in the desert of California.

    These results are summarized in the following Table 7.

    Table 7.  Summary of results.
    Model of Reliability Average life time (years) Error Means (%)
    in Adrar in California
    modified Weibul model 28.75 30.47 0.4
    Uniform model 37.70 23.80 1.1
    Generalized Weibul model 23.45 26.09 1.3
    exponential Weibul model 22.57 23.40 1.4
    Extreme values model 50.09 31.99 1.5
    Average lifetime calculated 32.51 27.15
    29.83 ≈ 30years

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The above results indicate that:

    1. The experimental data used have guided us to predict the future of solar panels operating in desert environments. We therefore believe that more return data will give us confidence in models and methods.

    2. The calculated mean error that present the average relative distance of the graph from the points of comparison is generally small (especially for the modified Weibul model). These reflect the skill of the optimization method used (the genetic algorithm).

    3. Extrapolation of curves in longer durations allows informing on the reliability (outside of periods of real measurements).

    4. The modified Weibul model is the most adequate of the models tested to simulate the reliability of photovoltaic modules (single crystalline silicon) and to estimate their lifetimes (MTBF) in the desert environments. It predicted a duration of nearly 30 years in the desert of California and of around 29 years for the Adrar area.

    5. It should be noted that the degradation of electrical power of photovoltaic modules in Californian desert is significant compared to that of Adrar region in the first step (in the initial period of 30 years).

    6. These obtained results are more or less comparable to those stated in references [11,12] (a degradation close to 1.53% /year in this study).

    It has been confirmed in this article that the modified Weibul law is the most adequate model compared to other tested models to simulate the reliability function of photovoltaic modules and estimate their lifetime while operating in desert environments (California and Adrar). Using simulation findings, an average lifespan of about 30 years has been predicted for photovoltaic modules exposed in desert regions where the maximum power of the photovoltaic module is degraded to almost 46% of its initial value. The annual rate of degradation is in the order of 1.5% / year. This obtained result is more or less comparable to those presented in the literature. The prediction results must be taken into consideration for any study of construction of solar stations in the Saharan environments.

    I thank my fellow researchers in Renewable Energy Research Unit in Saharan areas (URERMS) for all given help.

    The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid, Y. Tao, M. Winkler, Toward a mathematical theory of Keller–Segel models of pattern formation in biological tissues, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 25 (2015), 1663–1763. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251550044X doi: 10.1142/S021820251550044X
    [2] T. Hillen, K. J Painter, A user's guide to PDE models for chemotaxis, J. Math. Biol., 58 (2009), 183–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0201-3 doi: 10.1007/s00285-008-0201-3
    [3] E. F. Keller, L. A. Segel, Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability, J. Theor. Biol., 26 (1970), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5 doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5
    [4] D. Horstmann, M. Winkler, Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system, J. Differ. Equations, 215 (2005), 52–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2004.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2004.10.022
    [5] S. Zhou, S. Zhang, C. Mu, Well-posedness and non-uniform dependence for the hyperbolic Keller-Segel equation in the Besov framework, J. Differ. Equations, 302 (2021), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.09.006
    [6] L. Zhang, C. Mu, S. Zhou, On the initial value problem for the hyperbolic Keller-Segel equations in Besov spaces, J. Differ. Equations, 334 (2022), 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.06.026 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.06.026
    [7] K. Osaki, A. Yagi, Finite dimensional attractor for one-dimensional Keller-Segel equations, Funkcialaj Ekvacioj, 44 (2001), 441–469.
    [8] M. Winkler, Finite-time blow-up in the higher-dimensional parabolic–parabolic Keller–Segel system, J. Math. Pures Appl., 100 (2013), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2013.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.01.020
    [9] T. Cieślak, P. Laurençot, Finite time blow-up for a one-dimensional quasilinear parabolic–parabolic chemotaxis system, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C, 27 (2010), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.11.016
    [10] T. Cieślak, C. Stinner, Finite-time blowup and global-in-time unbounded solutions to a parabolic–parabolic quasilinear Keller–Segel system in higher dimensions, J. Differ. Equations, 252 (2012), 5832–5851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.01.045 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.01.045
    [11] T. Cieślak, M. Winkler, Finite-time blow-up in a quasilinear system of chemotaxis, Nonlinearity, 21 (2008), 1057. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/21/5/009 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/21/5/009
    [12] Y. Tao, M. Winkler, Boundedness in a quasilinear parabolic–parabolic Keller-Segel system with subcritical sensitivity, J. Differ. Equations, 252 (2012), 692–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2011.08.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2011.08.019
    [13] M. Winkler, Boundedness in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis system with logistic source, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 35 (2010), 1516–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300903473426 doi: 10.1080/03605300903473426
    [14] S. Ishida, K. Seki, T. Yokota, Boundedness in quasilinear Keller–Segel systems of parabolic–parabolic type on non-convex bounded domains, J. Differ. Equations, 256 (2014), 2993–3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2014.01.028 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.01.028
    [15] M. A. Herrero, J. J. Velázquez, A blow-up mechanism for a chemotaxis model, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa-classe Sci., 24 (1997), 633–683.
    [16] J. Zheng, Boundedness of solutions to a quasilinear parabolic–elliptic Keller–Segel system with logistic source, J. Differ. Equations, 259 (2015), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.003
    [17] K. Fujie, T. Senba, Application of an Adams type inequality to a two-chemical substances chemotaxis system, J. Differ. Equations, 263 (2017), 88–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2017.02.031 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.02.031
    [18] R. L. Miller, Demonstration of sperm chemotaxis in echinodermata: Asteroidea, Holothuroidea, Ophiuroidea, J. Exp. Zool., 234 (1985), 383–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402340308 doi: 10.1002/jez.1402340308
    [19] I. Tuval, L. Cisneros, C. Dombrowski, C. Wolgemuth, J. O. Kessler, R. E. Goldstein, Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102 (2005), 2277–2282. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406724102 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406724102
    [20] M. Winkler, How far do chemotaxis-driven forces influence regularity in the Navier-Stokes system?, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 369 (2017), 3067–3125. http://doi.org/10.1090/tran/6733 doi: 10.1090/tran/6733
    [21] J. Zheng, A new result for the global existence (and boundedness) and regularity of a three-dimensional Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system modeling coral fertilization, J. Differ. Equations, 272 (2021), 164–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.09.029 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.09.029
    [22] M. Winkler, Global mass-preserving solutions in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with rotational flux components, J. Evol. Equations, 18 (2018), 1267–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-018-0440-8 doi: 10.1007/s00028-018-0440-8
    [23] M. Winkler, Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier–Stokes system, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 211 (2014), 455–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-013-0678-9 doi: 10.1007/s00205-013-0678-9
    [24] M. Winkler, Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis(-Navier)-Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 37 (2012), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2011.591865 doi: 10.1080/03605302.2011.591865
    [25] M. Winkler, Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis–Navier–Stokes system, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C, 33 (2016), 1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2015.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2015.05.002
    [26] R. Duan, A. Lorz, P. Markowich, Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 35 (2010), 1635–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2010.497199 doi: 10.1080/03605302.2010.497199
    [27] M. Chae, K. Kang, J. Lee, Global existence and temporal decay in Keller-Segel models coupled to fluid equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 39 (2014), 1205–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2013.852224 doi: 10.1080/03605302.2013.852224
    [28] J. G. Liu, A. Lorz, A coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: global existence, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C, 28 (2011), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2011.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2011.04.005
    [29] Y. Wang, M. Winkler, Z. Xiang, Global classical solutions in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with subcritical sensitivity, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci., 18 (2018), 421–466. https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.201603_004 doi: 10.2422/2036-2145.201603_004
    [30] Y. Wang, Z. Xiang, Global existence and boundedness in a Keller–Segel–Stokes system involving a tensor-valued sensitivity with saturation: The 3D case, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 4944–4973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.07.010
    [31] J. Liu, Y. Wang, Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system involving a tensor-valued sensitivity with saturation, J. Differ. Equations, 262 (2017), 5271–5305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2017.01.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.01.024
    [32] Y. Ke, J. Zheng, An optimal result for global existence in a three-dimensional Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system involving tensor-valued sensitivity with saturation, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equations, 58 (2019), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-019-1568-2 doi: 10.1007/s00526-019-1568-2
    [33] J. Zheng, Eventual smoothness and stabilization in a three-dimensional Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system with rotational flux, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equations, 61 (2022), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-02164-6 doi: 10.1007/s00526-021-02164-6
    [34] Y. Wang, Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional Keller–Segel–Navier–Stokes system with subcritical sensitivity, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 27 (2017), 2745–2780. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202517500579 doi: 10.1142/S0218202517500579
    [35] T. Black, Global solvability of chemotaxis–fluid systems with nonlinear diffusion and matrix-valued sensitivities in three dimensions, Nonlinear Anal., 180 (2019), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2018.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2018.10.003
    [36] J. Zheng, An optimal result for global existence and boundedness in a three-dimensional Keller-Segel-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion, J. Differ. Equations, 267 (2019), 2385–2415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.013
    [37] H. Sohr, The Navier-Stokes Equations, An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001.
    [38] P. Yu, Blow-up prevention by saturated chemotactic sensitivity in a 2D Keller-Segel-Stokes system, Acta Appl. Math., 169 (2020), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-019-00307-8 doi: 10.1007/s10440-019-00307-8
    [39] Y. Tao, M. Winkler, A chemotaxis-haptotaxis model: The roles of nonlinear diffusion and logistic source, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 43 (2011), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1137/100802943 doi: 10.1137/100802943
    [40] J. Lankeit, Locally bounded global solutions to a chemotaxis consumption model with singular sensitivity and nonlinear diffusion, J. Differ. Equations, 262 (2017), 4052–4084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.12.007
    [41] L. C. Evans, Partial differential equations, American Mathematical Soc, 2010. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11294483348318394484&hl=en&as_sdt=0,33
    [42] J. Zheng, Y. Ke, Blow-up prevention by nonlinear diffusion in a 2D Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system with rotational flux, J. Differ. Equations, 268 (2020), 7092–7120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.071 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.071
    [43] M. Winkler, Boundedness and large time behavior in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion and general sensitivity, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equations, 54 (2015), 3789–3828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-015-0922-2 doi: 10.1007/s00526-015-0922-2
    [44] M. M. Porzio, V. Vespri, Hölder estimates for local solutions of some doubly nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations, J. Differ. Equations, 103 (1993), 146–178. https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1993.1045 doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1993.1045
    [45] J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T;B), Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 146 (1986), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762360 doi: 10.1007/BF01762360
    [46] T. Li, A. Suen, M. Winkler, C. Xue, Global small-data solutions of a two-dimensional chemotaxis system with rotational flux terms, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 25 (2015), 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515500177 doi: 10.1142/S0218202515500177
    [47] G. M. Lieberman, Hölder continuity of the gradient of solutions of uniformly parabolic equations with conormal boundary conditions, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 148 (1987), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774284 doi: 10.1007/BF01774284
    [48] O. A. Ladyzenskaja, V. A. Solonnikov, N. N. Uraíceva, Linear and Quasi-Linear Equations of Parabolic Type, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1968.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1801) PDF downloads(163) Cited by(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog