Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Huizhou GDP forecast based on fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey bernoulli markov model

  • In this paper, a fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli Markov model (FOANGBMKM) is established to forecast the annual GDP of Huizhou city from 2017 to 2021. The optimal fractional order number and nonlinear parameters of the model are determined by particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. An experiment is provided to validate the high fitting accuracy of this model, and the effect of prediction is better than that of the other four competitive models such as autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), grey model (GM (1, 1)), fractional accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli model (FANGBM (1, 1)) and fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli model (FOANGBM (1, 1)), which proves the robustness of the opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear Bernoulli Markov model. This research will provide a scientific basis and technical references for the economic planning industries.

    Citation: Meilan Qiu, Dewang Li, Zhongliang Luo, Xijun Yu. Huizhou GDP forecast based on fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey bernoulli markov model[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 947-960. doi: 10.3934/era.2023047

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dewang Li, Meilan Qiu, Jianming Jiang, Shuiping Yang . The application of an optimized fractional order accumulated grey model with variable parameters in the total energy consumption of Jiangsu Province and the consumption level of Chinese residents. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(3): 798-812. doi: 10.3934/era.2022042
    [2] Yunying Huang, Wenlin Gui, Yixin Jiang, Fengyi Zhu . Types of systemic risk and macroeconomic forecast: Evidence from China. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(12): 4469-4492. doi: 10.3934/era.2022227
    [3] Liping Fan, Pengju Yang . Load forecasting of microgrid based on an adaptive cuckoo search optimization improved neural network. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6364-6378. doi: 10.3934/era.2024296
    [4] Wenhui Feng, Yuan Li, Xingfa Zhang . A mixture deep neural network GARCH model for volatility forecasting. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3814-3831. doi: 10.3934/era.2023194
    [5] Dongbao Jia, Zhongxun Xu, Yichen Wang, Rui Ma, Wenzheng Jiang, Yalong Qian, Qianjin Wang, Weixiang Xu . Application of intelligent time series prediction method to dew point forecast. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(5): 2878-2899. doi: 10.3934/era.2023145
    [6] Yan Xia, Songhua Wang . Global convergence in a modified RMIL-type conjugate gradient algorithm for nonlinear systems of equations and signal recovery. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6153-6174. doi: 10.3934/era.2024286
    [7] Liping Yang, Hu Li . A hybrid algorithm based on parareal and Schwarz waveform relaxation. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 4086-4107. doi: 10.3934/era.2022207
    [8] E. A. Abdel-Rehim . The time evolution of the large exponential and power population growth and their relation to the discrete linear birth-death process. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2487-2509. doi: 10.3934/era.2022127
    [9] Yi Wei . The Riccati-Bernoulli subsidiary ordinary differential equation method to the coupled Higgs field equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6790-6802. doi: 10.3934/era.2023342
    [10] Jun Pan, Yuelong Tang . Two-grid $ H^1 $-Galerkin mixed finite elements combined with $ L1 $ scheme for nonlinear time fractional parabolic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7207-7223. doi: 10.3934/era.2023365
  • In this paper, a fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli Markov model (FOANGBMKM) is established to forecast the annual GDP of Huizhou city from 2017 to 2021. The optimal fractional order number and nonlinear parameters of the model are determined by particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. An experiment is provided to validate the high fitting accuracy of this model, and the effect of prediction is better than that of the other four competitive models such as autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), grey model (GM (1, 1)), fractional accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli model (FANGBM (1, 1)) and fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey Bernoulli model (FOANGBM (1, 1)), which proves the robustness of the opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear Bernoulli Markov model. This research will provide a scientific basis and technical references for the economic planning industries.



    GDP is a key index in the system of the national economic accounts, which reflects the economic power and market scale of a country (or region). It is more and more important to forecast and analyze annual GDP for the economic planning and development, which is of great significance for the economic development of a country. In order to forecast the GDP more effectively, a great deal of efforts have been devoted to the precision of prediction. For example, in [1], combining SPSS with EVIEWS 6.0, some mathematical statistics methods such as correlation analysis, regression analysis and combination prediction model were used to analyze the significant influencing factors of GDP, i.e., the total agricultural output value and residents' consumption level, quantitatively. In order to simulate the time series data of China's real GDP from 1952 to 2005, the auto-regressive and moving average model (ARMA) as well as Holter-Winter non-seasonal short-term forecast models were established, respectively, in [2] and then were used to forecast the national GDP from 2006 to 2010. Given the range of lag order and given different polynomial weight functions to high-frequency explanatory variables, the optimal mixed data sampling (MIDAS) model was selected based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) to forecast China's quarterly GDP [3]. According to the modeling theory and analysis technology of the mixed data econometric model, a MIDAS regression prediction model and non-restricted MIDAS model of five different weight functions were constructed in [4]. The least square identification method of MIDAS model was deduced with the traditional distributed lag model to forecast China's quarterly GDP in the short-term and analyze the change effects on hysteresis order of high frequency explanatory variables as well as the influence effects on low frequency variable GDP. In [5], the data of Nanjing GDP from 2000 to 2015 were transformed by wavelet transform, and the auto-regressive model (AR) and GM (1, 1) model were established to predict high frequency information as well as the low frequency information after transformation, respectively.

    The fractional GM in the grey system has attracted considerable research attention in recent years. The classical GM was based on 1-AGO. Wu et al. [6] proposed the fractional GM based on fractional accumulated grey operation (FAGO), followed by the FAGO discrete (Ma et al. [7]) and FAGO grey Bernoulli models being constructed and applied to the energy forecast by Wu et al. [8]. To solve the prediction problem with memory characteristics, Mao et al. [9] started from the memory principle, proposed to improve the integral differential equation into a fractional differential equation and established a single-variable fractional derivative grey prediction model. Mao et al. [10] introduced the fractional derivative based on FAGO. Kang et al. [11] proposed a variable-order fractional GM. Xie et al. [12] developed a generalized fractional GM by introducing a generalized fractional derivative that conforms to the memory effect.

    A self-adaptive intelligence grey prediction model with fractional accumulation was discussed in [13]. In [14], a smooth generation method was used to weaken the influence of the extreme value on the performance of GM (1, N), and a novel multi-variable grey forecasting model NMGM (1, N) based on the smooth generation of independent variable sequences with variable weights was constructed. A novel fractional time delayed GM with grey wolf optimization algorithm was established and applied to forecast the natural gas consumption of Chongqing city [15]. A novel definition of conformable fractional accumulation was proposed, which was more feasible and simpler compared to the traditional fractional GM [16]. In [17], the accumulating generation operator and the inverse accumulating generation operator were extended to the field of positive real numbers by Gamma function. Then, the analytic expressions were given out, and the inverse property was proved between the two operators. In [18], the primary data was processed by using reverse accumulating and extended to the field of fractional order on the basis of integer order. Then, the opposite-direction accumulating fractional Verhulst model was established based on the fractional opposite-direction accumulating generation operator and the fractional opposite-direction inverse accumulating generation operator. Although many excellent works have been done in the above areas, the GM (1, 1) model based on forward direction sequence accumulation cannot satisfy the priority principle of the new information, and there is no theory to prove that the opposite-direction sequence accumulation satisfies the new information principle for the GM (1, 1) model with inverse accumulation sequence [6]. A novel Grey system model with fractional accumulation was proposed and the priority of new information can be better reflected as the fractional accumulation order number becomes smaller in the in-sample model [19].

    The new information priority principle was embodied in the FAGO grey Bernoulli model [20]. Referring to the practice of Gao et al. [21], we list these representative complementary approaches to GDP in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Contemporary methods for forecasting GDP.
    Source Model Study focus City/region
    Statistical econometric method
    Bian [22]
    Tang et al. [23]
    Sun and Liu [24]
    Multiple logarithmic model Factor-MIDAS
    Dynamic combination model
    GDP growth
    GDP nowcasting Per Capital GDP
    China
    China
    Hebei/China
    Machine learning/Neural Network
    Yu [25]
    Hua [26]
    Jiang [27]
    RBF Neural Network Neural Network and ARIMA
    Machine learning
    GDP Forecasting
    GDP Trend
    Local GDP
    China
    China
    China
    GM
    Wu et al. [28]
    Wang [29]
    Lu and Wang [30]
    Liu and Cheng [31]
    NGBM(1, 1)
    GM/Few-Shot Learning
    GM
    Extended GM
    GDP
    Regional economics GDP
    GDP
    GDP
    China
    China
    Guangdong
    Suzhou/China

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Although a great deal of efforts are devoted to the grey prediction model, it is easy to generate random error among these models in fact. To capture the nonlinear trend in annual GDP data from Huizhou of China and obtain an appreciate prediction accuracy, this paper proposes a FOANGBMKM (1, 1)), and the main contributions can be summarized as follows:

    1) The FOANGBM (1, 1) model is established based on the PSO algorithm. Under the condition of minimizing mean relative errors, we search for the optimal order and nonlinear parameters of the FOANGBM (1, 1) model.

    2) According to Markov transition probability matrix and state division, we construct concrete expressions for the estimated and predicted values of the FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model.

    3) The validity of this proposed model is verified by numerical examples and applied to forecast Huizhou's annual GDP.

    Let the non-negative sequence be

    U(0)={u(0)(1),u(0)(2),,u(0)(n)}. (1)

    Accumulating the original sequence by the fractional opposite-direction accumulation, the accumulation sequence is obtained as follows:

    U(r)={u(r)(1),u(r)(2),,u(r)(n)}, (2)

    where

    u(r)(k)=ni=kCkiki+r1u(0)(i). (3)

    Then, the whitening differential equation of the model FOANGBMKM (1, 1) is

    du(r)dt+au(r)(t)=b(u(r)(t))γ, (4)

    and the grey differential equation is

    u(r)(k)u(r)(k1)+av(r)(k)=b(v(r)(k))γ, (5)

    where v(r)(k)=[u(r)(k)+u(r)(k1)](k=1,2,,n).

    We obtain the following matrixes

    A=[v(r)(2)(v(r)(2))γv(r)(3)(v(r)(3))γv(r)(n)(v(r)(n))γ],D=[u(r)(2)u(r)(1)u(r)(3)u(r)(2)u(r)(n)u(r)(n1)], (6)

    Let θ=(a,b)T,

    By using the least square algorithm, we obtain

    θ=(ATA)1ATD, (7)

    where Eq (7) is obtained by the least squares formula.

    Assume that u(r)(n)=u(0)(n), and then the solution of Eq (4) is

    ˆu(r)(k)=[((u(0)(n))1γˆbˆa)eˆa(1γ)(kn)+ˆbˆa]11γ, (8)

    where

    ˆU(r)={ˆu(r)(1),ˆu(r)(2),,ˆu(r)(n)}. (9)

    Applying the inverse accumulating on Eq (9), the result of simulation is as follows

    α(r)U(0)={α(1)ˆu(1r)(1),α(1)ˆu(1r)(2),,α(1)ˆu(1r)(n),}. (10)

    Next, we will calculate the fitting values ˆu(0)(1),ˆu(0)(2),,ˆu(0)(n) and the prediction value ˆu(0)(n+1),ˆu(0)(n+2),

    Let

    ˆU(r)={ˆu(r)(n+1),ˆu(r)(n+2),,}, (11)

    and we define the inverse accumulating operator with r order of the prediction sequence as follows:

    u(r)(t)=ti=nCnini+r1ˆu(0)(t). (12)

    By applying the fractional opposite-direction inverse accumulating on Eq (12), we obtain the prediction values

    ˆu(r)(t)=ti=n(1)itΓ(r+1)Γ(in+1)Γ(n+ri+1)ˆu(0)(i). (13)

    The Markov model is a general tool for data, statistics and analysis, which predicts the latest state according to the state transition probability of the previous time. Markov process has the characteristics of non-aftereffect property and good short-term prediction, which is suitable to be applied to analyze the fluctuation data. It has been widely applied in military, biology, meteorology and so on [32,33,34].

    According to the Markov chain, the data sequence can be partitioned into multiply different states, which is denoted by E1,E2,,Em. The state transition occurs only at countable moments such as t1,t2,,tm, and state partitions are

    Ei=[Qi1,Qi2](i=1,2,,j). (14)

    where Qi1,Qi2 represents the lower and upper limits of relative error of state partition respectively, j denotes the number of state partition.

    The transition probability of Markov chains from state Ei to state Ej after k steps is expressed by pij(k):

    pij(k)=mij(k)Mi, (15)

    where Mi denotes the total number for the occurrence of status Ei, mij(k) represents the number of state Ei to state Ej after k steps, m is the number of state partition.

    The state transition probability matrix of one step is as following:

    P(1)=[p11(1)p12(1)p1m(1)p21(1)p22(1)p2m(1)pm1(1)pm2(1)pmm(1)]. (16)

    Using the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation repeatedly, let V(0) be the initial vector for the original state Ei of one variable, and we get the transition probability matrix after k steps and the state vector as the following, respectively.

    P(k)=(P(1))k, (17)
    V(k)=V(0)(P(1))k. (18)

    Select j groups of data which are closest to the predicted data. According to the order of data groups from near to far, the number of the step t is determined as 1,2,,j. Then, a new matrix is constructed by choosing the row vectors of the t-step state transition matrix corresponding to each data, and the most probable state of prediction value is determined by the sum of the column vectors of the new matrix. The state partition can be determined after confirming the status. Choosing the midpoint of the state interval 12(Qi1+Qi2) as the Markov corrected value, the forecast value with Markov model is

    ˆuM(k)=ˆuFOANGBM(k)1+12(Qi1+Qi2). (19)

    In this part, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE) are used to evaluate the model errors. With [35], we calculate statistics STD and R2, and their calculation formulas are listed as follows.

    MAPE=1nnt=1|(ˆutut)ut|, (20)
    RMSE=1nnt=1(ˆuiut)2, (21)
    STD=1nnt=1(|ˆuiut|utMAPE)2, (22)
    R2=1nt=1(ˆutut)2nt=1(ˆutˉu)2, (23)

    where ˉu is the average of training data, and ˉu=1nnt=1ut.

    PSO algorithm is a swarm intelligence optimization algorithm in the field of computational intelligence excepted to the ant colony algorithm and the fish swarm algorithm, which is originated from the research on predation problems of birds and first proposed by Kennedy and Eberhart in 1995. The PSO algorithm has many advantages such as definite physical concept, good convergence, more stability, etc. In this section, we will use PSO algorithm to search for the optimal order r and nonlinear parameter γ of the FOANGBM (1, 1) model under the condition of minimizing mean relative errors, the mathematical expression of the PSO algorithm is

    minf(r,γ)=1n1nk=2|ˆu(0)(k)u(0)(k)u(0)(k)|. (24)

    Importing the statistical yearbook data of Huizhou into R, and combing the PSO algorithm with (2.2), we get the optimal order r=0.01 and the nonlinear parameter γ=0.99 of the accumulating generation operator, respectively. The accumulating generation operator is

    ˆu(0.01)(k)=[((u0(n))0.011.1974)e10.15562(kn)+1.1974]100, (25)

    where k=2,3,, u0(n)=33,595,203.

    Applying the opposite-direction inverse accumulation with order r=0.01 on Eq (25), we obtain the estimate value as k=2,3,,12 and the prediction value as k=13,14,15,16,17. Taking GM (1, 1) model and fractional nonlinear grey Bernoulli model (FANGBM (1, 1)) as the comparison model, the prediction results are listed in Table 2.

    Table 2.  The comparison results among GM (1, 1), FANGBM (1, 1) and FOANGBM (1, 1).
    Year Raw FOANGBM (1, 1) FANGBM (1, 1) GM (1, 1)
    Predicted value Relative
    error
    Predicted
    value
    Relative
    error
    Predicted
    value
    Relative
    error
    2005 8,051,130 7,614,028 −5.43% 8,051,130 0% 8,051,130 0%
    2006 9,309,277 9,425,517 1.25% 8,899,122 −4.41% 10,811,274 16.13%
    2007 11,217,080 11,417,136 1.79% 11,203,745 −0.12% 12,190,465 8.68%
    2008 13,095,122 13,565,876 3.60% 13,428,613 2.55% 13,745,599 4.97%
    2009 14,130,759 15,845,538 12.14% 15,666,871 10.87% 15,499,121 9.68%
    2010 17,235,617 18,228,457 5.76% 17,968,577 4.25% 17,476,339 1.40%
    2011 20,801,369 20,687,249 −0.55% 20,366,854 −2.09% 19,705,790 −5.27%
    2012 23,524,573 23,196,650 −1.39% 22,886,982 −2.71% 22,219,652 −5.55%
    2013 26,745,036 25,735,859 −3.77% 25,550,327 −4.47% 25,054,207 −6.32%
    2014 29,591,103 28,292,849 −4.39% 28,376,306 −4.11% 28,250,364 −4.53%
    2015 30,902,218 30,877,291 −0.08% 31,383,479 1.56% 31,854,255 3.08%
    2016 33,595,203 33,595,203 0% 34,590,214 2.96% 35,917,892 6.91%
    RMSE 755,540 RMSE 811200 RMSE 1,272,100
    MAPE 3.34% MAPE 3.34% MAPE 6.04%
    STD 3.28% STD 2.71% STD 4.02%
    R2 99.12% R2 99.08% R2 97.71%
    2017 37,457,511 35,182,264 −6.07% 38,015,126 1.48% 40,499,927 8.12%
    2018 40,033,312 37,507,682 −6.30% 41,677,391 4.10% 45,666,490 14.07%
    2019 41,929,295 39,816,692 −5.03% 45,596,987 8.74% 51,492,151 22.80%
    2020 42,217,852 42,254,647 0.08% 49,794,889 17.94% 58,060,989 37.52%
    2021 49,773,600 44,161,175 −11.27% 54,293,245 9.08% 65,467,810 31.53%
    RMSE 3,082,800 RMSE 4342900 RMSE 11,223,000
    MAPE 5.76% MAPE 8.27% MAPE 22.81%
    STD 3.56% STD 5.62% STD 10.81%
    R2 42.62% R2 59.04% R2 28.92%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    As can be seen from Table 2, the prediction results of the FOANGBM (1, 1) model are closer to the real values, and the relative error is smaller than that of other models. We also can obtain the smallest value of RMSE, STD and the MAPE when forecasting the test data and estimate the training data by using the FOANGBM (1, 1) model. However, FOANGBM (1, 1) model has a higher value of R2 than that of the other models, such as FANGBM (1, 1), GM (1, 1) and ARIMA (in Table 3).

    Table 3.  The comparison results among ARIMA, FOANGBM (1, 1) and FOANGBMKM (1, 1).
    Year Raw ARIMA FOANGBM (1, 1) FOANGBMKM (1, 1)
    Predicted value Relative
    error
    Predicted
    value
    Relative
    error
    Predicted
    value
    Relative
    error
    2005 8,051,130 8,043,079 −0.10% 7,614,028 −5.43% 1 7,912,322
    2006 9,309,277 8,756,966 −5.93% 9,425,517 1.25% 2 9,438,731
    2007 11,217,080 10,465,731 −6.70% 11,417,136 1.79% 3 11,041,717
    2008 13,095,122 12,769,877 −2.48% 13,565,876 3.60% 3 13,119,802
    2009 14,130,759 14,837,179 5.00% 15,845,538 12.14% 5 14,341,151
    2010 17,235,617 15,354,878 −10.91% 18,228,457 5.76% 4 17,045,499
    2011 20,801,369 19,439,938 −6.54% 20,687,249 −0.55% 2 20,716,251
    2012 23,524,573 23,943,896 1.78% 23,196,650 −1.39% 2 23,229,170
    2013 26,745,036 26,305,582 −1.64% 25,735,859 −3.77% 1 26,719,122
    2014 29,591,103 29,557,422 −0.11% 28,292,849 −4.39% 1 29,373,805
    2015 30,902,218 32,336,129 4.64% 30,877,291 −0.08% 2 30,920,579
    2016 33,595,203 32,601,380 −2.96% 33,595,203 0% 2 33,642,302
    RMSE 925520 RMSE 755,540 RMSE 156,190
    MAPE 4.07% MAPE 3.34% MAPE 0.85%
    STD 3.04% STD 3.28% STD 0.62%
    R2 98.88% R2 99.12% R2 99.97%
    2017 37,457,511 35,638,803 −4.86% 35,182,264 −6.07% 1 35,231,588
    2018 40,033,312 37,731,237 −5.75% 37,507,682 −6.30% 1 37,560,266
    2019 41,929,295 39,646,009 −5.45% 39,816,692 −5.03% 1 39,872,513
    2020 42,217,852 41,469,128 −1.77% 42,254,647 0.08% 2 42,313,886
    2021 49,773,600 43,180,258 −13.25% 44,161,175 −11.27% 1 44,223,087
    RMSE 3,401,600 RMSE 3,082,800 RMSE 3,037,100
    MAPE 6.21% MAPE 5.76% MAPE 5.68%
    STD 3.79% STD 3.56% STD 3.48%
    R2 21.04% R2 42.62% R2 43.47%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Generally, the state interval is partitioned by the relative error of FAONGBM model, it can be seen from Table 2 that the minimum and maximum relative error of the first 12 fitting data of this model are −5.43 and 12.14% respectively. Hence, according to the equal spacing rule, five state partitions are divided as follow, E1(5.45%,1.91%], E2(1.91%,1.63%], E3(1.63%,5.17%], E4(5.17%,8.71%], E5(8.17%,12.25%].

    Combining these state partitions with the probability of the current state transferring to the next state, we obtain the state transition matrix of steps one

    P(1)=[0.340.660000.330.330.3400000.500.50100000010].

    Constructing the new state transition matrix by using the several most recent groups of data, we get the state of 2017, which is listed in Table 4.

    Table 4.  The prediction status of 2017.
    Year Initial status Transferring steps Pij E1 E2 E3 E4 E5
    2016 2 1 P12 0.33 0.33 0.34 0 0
    2015 2 2 P22 0.2211 0.3267 0.2822 0 0.17
    2014 1 3 P31 0.2593 0.3660 0.2625 0 0.1122
    2013 1 4 P41 0.2089 0.2919 0.2557 0.1122 0.1313
    2012 2 5 P52 0.1732 0.3160 0.2335 0.1261 0.1062
    Total 1.1925 1.6765 1.3739 0.2383 0.5197

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    According to the results of Table 4, since E2 is the maximum in summation, we deduce that the most likely state of Huizhou GDP in 2017 is E2. The predicting values are 35182264 by FOANGBM model and 35231588 by Markov model, respectively. Applying the same method, we obtain the results of GDP from 2018–2021 forecasted by Markov model, which are listed in Table 3.

    As can be seen from Table 3, the MAPE, RMSE, STD and R2 fitted by FOANGBM (1, 1) model are 3.34%, 755540, 3.28% and 99.12%, respectively, while these values are 0.85%, 156190, 0.62% and 99.97%, respectively, by applying FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model. This indicates that the fitting effect of FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model is better than FOANGBM (1, 1) model. At the same time, the MAPE, RMSE, STD and R2 predicted by FOANGBM (1, 1) model are 5.76%, 3082800, 3.56% and 42.62%, respectively, while these values forecasted by FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model are 5.68%, 3037100, 3.48% and 43.47%, respectively. This shows that the prediction accuracy of the FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model is better than the FOANGBM (1, 1) model.

    The results in Figure 1 show that the curve of FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model is closer to the true values than that of FOANGBM (1, 1) model.

    Figure 1.  The forecast results of different models for GDP of Huizhou in China.

    In this paper, a novel FOANGBMKM is proposed to predict the annual GDP of Huizhou city. The suitable states are determined by using the transition matrix of Markov. PSO algorithm is used to search for the optimal order as well as the optimal nonlinear parameters of the accumulating generation operator. According to the results of prediction of the statistical yearbook data from 2005 to 2016, we calculate four statistics, MAPE, RMSE, STD and R2, for different models. According to the size of the values of these statistics, we find that the estimation accuracy of FOANGBM model is higher than that of GM, ARIMA and FANGBM models. At the same time, the fitting effect FOANGBMKM model is superior to FOANGBM model. Finally, the proposed model is applied to forecast the GDP of Huizhou city from 2017 to 2021. Compared to the opposite-direction accumulating linear Bernoulli model, the new model can more accurately and effectively to evaluate the development level of Huizhou GDP. The results show that the prediction effect of the proposed new model is better than that of the other four competitive models such as GM (1, 1), ARIMA, FANGBM (1, 1) and FOANGBM (1, 1), which proves the greater accuracy and efficiency of the FOANGBMKM (1, 1) model.

    We will focus on the multi-variable GMs of electricity consumption that fully utilize potential factors. In addition, the other cutting-edge optimization algorithms are used to seek for the optimal parameters, such as ant lion optimization algorithm [36], grey wolf algorithm [37] and whale optimization algorithm [38]. Further, it is well known that the Optimal fractional accumulation GM with variable parameters is an efficient method to improve the prediction accuracy [39] and fractional time-varying grey traffic flow model based on viscoelastic fluid [40], which can be used for forecasting shorten prediction period, thus respectively establishing the Optimal fraction accumulation grey Markov model with variable parameters and fractional time-varying grey traffic flow Markov model will receive extensive attention in our next work.

    This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of China (Grant No.12071046, U1930402, 11931013), NSF of Huizhou University (Grant No. hzu201806) and "One hundred excellent young teachers training project" of Huizhou University. This work was also supported by Ministry of Education "Blue Fire Program" (Huizhou) Industry-University-Research Joint Innovation Fund 2018 Annual Project: High-power Intelligent Dimming Control System (CXZJHZ201812), the Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (Grant No. 2021ZDJS080), and Huizhou University School Level Undergraduate Teaching Quality Engineering Project (XJYJG2021045, 15109038), and Horizontal Project of Huizhou University (2022HX057, 2022HX058), and Huizhou philosophy and Social Sciences Discipline Co-Construction Project (2022ZX046).

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Y. C. Yao, Analysis of Economic Factors affecting GDP Growth, Master's Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology in Harbin, 2014.
    [2] X. Z. Hao, S. Y. Li, Modeling and forecasting of GDP time series in China, Stat. Decis., 23 (2007), 4–6.
    [3] T. Liu, W. M. Yang, R. T. Hu, An empirical study on quarterly GDP forecasting of mixed frequency data based on AIC criterion, Stat. Theory Pract., 6 (2021), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.13999/j.cnki.tjllysj.2021.06.006 doi: 10.13999/j.cnki.tjllysj.2021.06.006
    [4] W. G. Wang, Y. Yu, Short-term prediction of quaeterly GDP in China based on MIDAS regression model, J. Quant. Technol. Econ., 33 (2016), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2016.04.008 doi: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2016.04.008
    [5] M. Zhang, Y. G. Dang, The application of combined forecast model base on wavelets on the predict of Nanjing's GDP, Math. Pract. Theory, 48 (2018), 111–118.
    [6] L. Wu, S. Liu, L. Yao, S. Yan, D. Liu, Grey system model with the fractional order accumulation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18 (2013), 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.017 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.017
    [7] X. Ma, M. Xie, W. Wu, B. Zeng, Y. Wang, X. Wu, The novel fractional discrete multivariate grey system model and its applications. Appl. Math. Modell. 70 (2019), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.01.039 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.01.039
    [8] W. Wu, X. Ma, B. Zeng, Y. Wang, W. Cai, Forecasting short-term renewable energy consumption of China using a novel fractional nonlinear grey Bernoulli model, Renewable Energy, 140 (2019), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.006
    [9] S. Mao, M. Gao, X. Xiao, M. Zhu, A novel fractional grey system model and its application, Appl. Math. Modell., 40 (2016), 5063–5076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.12.014 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.12.014
    [10] S. Mao, Y. Kang, Y. Zhang, X. Xiao, H. Zhu, Fractional grey model based on non-singular exponential kernel and its application in the prediction of electronic waste precious metal content, ISA Trans., 107 (2020), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.07.023 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.07.023
    [11] Y. Kang, S. Mao, Y. Zhang, Variable order fractional grey model and its application, Appl. Math. Model., 97 (2021), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.059 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.059
    [12] W. Xie, W. Wu, C. Liu, M. Goh, Generalized fractional grey system models: the memory effects perspective, ISA Trans., 126 (2022), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.037 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.037
    [13] B. Zeng, S. Liu, A self-adaptive intelligence grey prediction model with the optimal fractional order accumulating operator and its application, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 7843–7857. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4565 doi: 10.1002/mma.4565
    [14] B. Zeng, H. Liu, X. Ma, A novel multi-variable grey forecasting model and its application in forecasting the grain production in China, Comput. & Ind. Eng., 150 (2020), 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106915 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106915
    [15] X. Ma, X. Mei, W. Wu, X. Wu, B. Zeng, A novel fractional time delayed grey model with Grey Wolf Optimizer and its applications in forecasting the natural gas and coal consumption in Chongqing China. Energy, 178 (2019), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.096 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.096
    [16] X. Ma, W. Wu, B. Zeng, Y. Wang, X. Wu, The conformable fractional grey system model, ISA Trans., 96 (2020), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.009
    [17] W. Meng, S. F. Liu, B. Zeng, Z. G. Fang, Mutual Invertibility of Fractional order Grey Accumulating Generation Operator and Reducing Generation Operator, Acta Anal. Funct. Appl., 18 (2016), 274–283. doi: 10.12012/1009-1327(2016)03-0274-10
    [18] J. H. Wang, T. Zhu, R. N. Yu, N. Zhang, Fractional inverse accumulation and accumulation operators and reciprocal properties, Math. Pract. Theory, 48 (2018), 262–271.
    [19] L. F. Wu, B. Fu, GM (1, 1) Model with Fractional Order Opposite-direction Accumulated Generation and its properties, Stat. & Decis. 18 (2017), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2017.18.007 doi: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2017.18.007
    [20] Y. Zhang, S. Mao, Y. Kang, A clean energy forecasting model based on artificial intelligence and fractional derivative grey Bernoulli models, Grey Syst.: Theory Appl., 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-08-2020-0101 doi: 10.1108/GS-08-2020-0101
    [21] M. Gao, H. Yang, Q. Xiao, M. Goh, COVID-19 lockdowns and air quality: Evidence from grey spatiotemporal forecasts, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 83 (2022), 101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101228 doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101228
    [22] X. L. Bian, Econometric analysis of China's GDP growth and industrial structure. Ecol. Econ., 18 (2022), 34–41.
    [23] X. B. Tang, B. Liu, J. N. Liu, Variable selection, Factor-MIDAS and GDP nowcasting during recession and recovery period of Covid-19, Stat. Res., 39 (2022), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.01.008 doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.01.008
    [24] C. Y. Sun, X. Y. Liu, Prediction of per capital GDP in hebei province based on dynamic combination model, J. Appl. Stat. Manage., 41 (2022), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.13860/j.cnki.sltj.20210722-005 doi: 10.13860/j.cnki.sltj.20210722-005
    [25] Y. Yu, GDP Economic forecasting model based on improved RBF neural network, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7630268 doi: 10.1155/2022/7630268
    [26] S. Hua, Back-Propagation neural network and ARIMA algorithm for GDP trend analysis, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1967607 doi: 10.1155/2022/1967607
    [27] Z. Jiang, Prediction and industrial structure analysis of local GDP economy based on machine learning, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7089914 doi: 10.1155/2022/7089914
    [28] W. Wu, T. Zhang, C. Zheng, A novel optimized nonlinear grey bernoulli model for forecasting China's GDP, Complexity, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1731262 doi: 10.1155/2019/1731262
    [29] B. Wang, Prediction algorithm of uncertain fund demand for regional economics using GM model and Few-Shot learning, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2307149 doi: 10.1155/2022/2307149
    [30] J. L. Lu, M. H. Wang, Prediction and analysis of Guangdong's gross domestic product based on grey prediction method, J. Sci. Teach. Coll. Univ., 39 (2019), 10–12.
    [31] Y. Liu, M. L. Cheng, Extended grey GM (1, 1) models and their application:A case study of Suzhou GDP, J. Suzhou Univ. Sci. Tech. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 39 (2022), 15–22.
    [32] M. C. Şahingil, R. Yurttaş, The determination of flare launching programs to use against pulse width modulating guided missile seekers via hidden Markov models, in 2012 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), (2012), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2012.6204715
    [33] A. Krogh, B. Larsson, G. H. Von, E. L. L. Sonnhammer, Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes, J. Mol. Biol., 305 (2001), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
    [34] M. Thyer, G. Kuczera, Modeling long-term persistence in hydroclimatic time series using a hidden state Markov model, Water Resour. Res., 36 (2000), 3301–3310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900157 doi: 10.1029/2000WR900157
    [35] M. Gao, H. Yang, Q. Xiao, M. Goh, A novel method for carbon emission forecasting based on Gompertz's law and fractional grey model: evidence from American industrial sector, Renewable Energy, 181 (2022), 803–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.072 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.072
    [36] S. Mirjalili, P. Jangir, S. Saremi, Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: a multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems, Appl. Intell., 46 (2017), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0825-8 doi: 10.1007/s10489-016-0825-8
    [37] S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, Grey wolf optimizer, Adv. Eng. Softw., 69 (2014), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
    [38] S. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, The whale optimization algorithm, Adv. Eng. Softw., 95 (2016), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008
    [39] D. W. Li, M. L. Qiu, J. M. Jiang, S. P. Yang, The application of an optimized fractional order accumulated grey model with variable parameters in the total energy consumption of Jiangsu province and the consumption level of Chinese residents, Electron. Res. Arch., 30 (2022), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2022042 doi: 10.3934/era.2022042
    [40] Y. X. Kang, S. H. Mao, Y. H. Zhang, Fractional time-varying grey traffic flow model based on viscoelastic fluid and its application, Trans. Res. Part B, 157 (2022), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2022.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.01.007
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Dewang Li, Meilan Qiu, Zhongliang Luo, Huizhou resident population, Guangdong resident population and elderly population forecast based on the NAR neural network Markov model, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 3235, 10.3934/math.2024157
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1619) PDF downloads(76) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog