Year | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
HIV/AIDS | 57325 | 64460 | 71852 | 78613 | 85999 |
Gonorrhea | 2358 | 2230 | 1818 | 1819 | 1720 |
Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
HIV/AIDS | 92666 | 98555 | 104903 | 111351 | 117817 |
Gonorrhea | 1893 | 1643 | 2104 | 3028 | 4098 |
In this paper, we provide an effective method for estimating the thresholds of the stochastic models with time delays by using of the nonnegative semimartingale convergence theorem. Firstly, we establish the stochastic delay differential equation models for two diseases, and obtain two thresholds of two diseases and the sufficient conditions for the persistence and extinction of two diseases. Then, numerical simulations for co-infection of HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea in Yunnan Province, China, are carried out. Finally, we discuss some biological implications and focus on the impact of some key model parameters. One of the most interesting findings is that the stochastic fluctuation and time delays introduced into the deterministic models can suppress the outbreak of the diseases, which can provide some useful control strategies to regulate the dynamics of the diseases, and the numerical simulations verify this phenomenon.
Citation: Zhimin Li, Tailei Zhang, Xiuqing Li. Threshold dynamics of stochastic models with time delays: A case study for Yunnan, China[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1661-1679. doi: 10.3934/era.2020085
[1] | Zhimin Li, Tailei Zhang, Xiuqing Li . Threshold dynamics of stochastic models with time delays: A case study for Yunnan, China. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1661-1679. doi: 10.3934/era.2020085 |
[2] | Wenxuan Li, Suli Liu . Dynamic analysis of a stochastic epidemic model incorporating the double epidemic hypothesis and Crowley-Martin incidence term. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6134-6159. doi: 10.3934/era.2023312 |
[3] | Tao Zhang, Mengjuan Wu, Chunjie Gao, Yingdan Wang, Lei Wang . Probability of disease extinction and outbreak in a stochastic tuberculosis model with fast-slow progression and relapse. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 7104-7124. doi: 10.3934/era.2023360 |
[4] | Feng Wang, Taotao Li . Dynamics of a stochastic epidemic model with information intervention and vertical transmission. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(6): 3700-3727. doi: 10.3934/era.2024168 |
[5] | Wenjie Zuo, Mingguang Shao . Stationary distribution, extinction and density function for a stochastic HIV model with a Hill-type infection rate and distributed delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 4066-4085. doi: 10.3934/era.2022206 |
[6] | Xiangyun Shi, Dan Zhou, Xueyong Zhou, Fan Yu . Predicting the trend of leptospirosis in China via a stochastic model with vector and environmental transmission. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(6): 3937-3951. doi: 10.3934/era.2024176 |
[7] | Yilin Li, Jianwen Feng, Jingyi Wang . Mean square synchronization for stochastic delayed neural networks via pinning impulsive control. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3172-3192. doi: 10.3934/era.2022161 |
[8] | Yan Geng, Jinhu Xu . Modelling and analysis of a delayed viral infection model with follicular dendritic cell. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(8): 5127-5138. doi: 10.3934/era.2024236 |
[9] | Xinrui Yan, Yuan Tian, Kaibiao Sun . Effects of additional food availability and pulse control on the dynamics of a Holling-($ p $+1) type pest-natural enemy model. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6454-6480. doi: 10.3934/era.2023327 |
[10] | Xudong Hai, Chengxu Chen, Qingyun Wang, Xiaowei Ding, Zhaoying Ye, Yongguang Yu . Effect of time-varying delays' dynamic characteristics on the stability of Hopfield neural networks. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1207-1230. doi: 10.3934/era.2025054 |
In this paper, we provide an effective method for estimating the thresholds of the stochastic models with time delays by using of the nonnegative semimartingale convergence theorem. Firstly, we establish the stochastic delay differential equation models for two diseases, and obtain two thresholds of two diseases and the sufficient conditions for the persistence and extinction of two diseases. Then, numerical simulations for co-infection of HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea in Yunnan Province, China, are carried out. Finally, we discuss some biological implications and focus on the impact of some key model parameters. One of the most interesting findings is that the stochastic fluctuation and time delays introduced into the deterministic models can suppress the outbreak of the diseases, which can provide some useful control strategies to regulate the dynamics of the diseases, and the numerical simulations verify this phenomenon.
At present, in order to better study the transmission mechanism of infectious diseases, many researchers introduced noises into the deterministic models and studied the effect of noise on the dynamics of the established stochastic epidemic models. Stochastic models could be a more appropriate way of modeling epidemics in many circumstances [11,24]. In particular, Liu et al. [11] established a deterministic model with non-linear incidence rate, and studied the global stability of the model by the basic reproduction number of the model. Then, based on the deterministic model, the stochastic model is established, the dynamics of the stochastic model is proved theoretically, and the properties of these two models are compared. The paper [24] shows that the stochastic models are able to consider randomness of infectious contacts occurring in the latent or infectious periods. The combination of stochastic model and deterministic counterpart can make people understand the epidemic trend of infectious diseases more comprehensively, and make the established theory and prevention strategy more reliable. Many realistic stochastic epidemic models can be derived based on their corresponding deterministic counterparts. Britton [3] gave an excellent survey on stochastic differential equation (SDE) epidemic models which presented the exact and asymptotic properties of a simple stochastic epidemic model, and illustrated by studying effects of vaccination and inference procedures for important parameters such as the basic reproduction number and the critical vaccination coverage. Allen [1] provided a great introduction to the methods of derivation for various types of stochastic models including SDE epidemic models. There are different possible approaches including random effects in the models, both from biological and mathematical perspective [9]. The general stochastic differential equation SIRS model introduced in this paper adopts the modeling approach from Mao et al. [13], which has been pursued in [11,24], and assume that the parameters involved in the model always fluctuate around some average value due to continuous fluctuation in the environment.
On the other hand, the spread of infectious diseases is not only related to the current state, but also to the historical state (see [25,23]). Therefore, it is more practical to use stochastic differential equation model with time delay to describe the spread of infectious diseases. Recently, many scholars have studied the stochastic infectious disease model with time delay. In particular, Liu et al. [10] proposed and studied the stochastic SEIR epidemic model with infinite distribution delay, and obtained the sufficient conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the endemic equilibrium. Another part of the work is to introduce the disturbance of some parameter variables in the system, which can make the system have a disease-free equilibrium point and give the stability conditions of the disease-free equilibrium point. However, when the parameters of the delay infectious disease model are disturbed randomly, the stochastic model generally does not have disease-free equilibrium and endemic equilibrium. Tornatore et al. [19] proposed a stochastic model with latency and time delay for mosquito transmission, and proposed a strategy for controlling disease transmission. After that, Fan et al. [5] considered the persistence and extinction of a class of stochastic SIR epidemic model with generalized nonlinear incidence and transient immunity and time delay, and obtained the threshold of the model. On the basis of [19,5], Berrhazi et al. [2] considered the stochastic SIR epidemic model with Beddington-DeAngelis incidence and delayed immune loss under Lévy noise disturbance, and studied its persistence, extinction and threshold problems. Considering the effect of vaccination and the incubation period of some diseases (such as tuberculosis, AIDS, measles) after infection, Liu et al. [12] discussed the stochastic SVEIR epidemic model with distribution delay. By constructing appropriate stochastic Lyapunov function, the existence, uniqueness and ergodicity of the positive distribution of the system were obtained.
Motivated by above mentioned papers, we introduce time delays and stochastic into the deterministic differential equations. This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2.1, we give the basic theory and related lemmas. In Section 2.2, we construct a class of stochastic differential equations models with time delays, and give the thresholds and dynamics of the models by using the theorems and lemmas of Section 2.1. In Section 3, we do a case study of the models in Section 2.2. In addition, we carry out some numerical simulations aiming to HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea transmission in Yunnan by using the models. In Section 4, we summarize the whole paper.
Firstly, we introduce some lemmas and notations, which will be used in the following parts. Generally speaking, the
dX(t)=f(t,X(t))dt+g(t,X(t))dB(t), | (2.1.1) |
where
L=∂∂t+d∑i=1fi(t)∂∂xi+12d∑i,j=1[gT(x,t)g(x,t)]ij∂2∂xi∂xj. | (2.1.2) |
If
LV(x,t)=Vt(x,t)+Vx(x,t)f(x,t)+12trace[gT(x,t)g(x,t)], | (2.1.3) |
where
Lemma 2.1. [27] Let
Lemma 2.2. [27] Let
ρM(t):=∫tod[M,M](s)(1+s)2,t⩾0, | (2.1.4) |
where
Lemma 2.3. [4] Set
logf(t)=λt−λ0∫t0f(s)ds+F(t)a.s. | (2.1.5) |
for all
limt→∞⟨f(t)⟩=λλ0a.s. | (2.1.6) |
In real world, a group of people will often be infected with a variety of diseases, especially two of them have the same or similar transmission routes. We discuss a class of models with two infectious diseases as follows.
In the paper [14], Meng and Zhao formulated a kind of epidemic model with two classes of epidemics as follows
{dSdt=A−dS−β1SI11+a1I1−β2SI21+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2,dI1dt=β1SI11+a1I1−(d+α1+r1)I1,dI2dt=β2SI21+a2I2−(d+α2+r2)I2, | (2.2.1) |
where
Theorem 2.4. [14] For system (2.2.1), the following conclusions are true.
(i) If
(ii) If
(iii) If
(iv) If
Next, we study the stochastic model with time delays corresponding to model (2.2.1).
{dS=[A−dS−β1S(t−τ1)I11+a1I1−β2S(t−τ2)I21+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t),dI1=[β1S(t−τ1)I11+a1I1−(d+α1+r1)I1]dt+σ1I1dB1(t),dI2=[β2S(t−τ2)I21+a2I2−(d+α2+r2)I2]dt+σ2I2dB2(t), | (2.2.2) |
where
Lemma 2.5. For the solution
limsupt→∞(S(t)+I1(t)+I2(t))<∞a.s. | (2.2.3) |
Moreover,
limt→+∞1t∫t0σ1I1(θ)dB1(θ)=0,limt→+∞1t∫t0σ2I2(θ)dB2(θ)=0,limt→+∞1t∫t0σ3S(θ)dB3(θ)=0,limt→+∞1t∫t0σidBi(θ)=0,(i=1,2,3)a.s. | (2.2.4) |
Proof. From (2.2.2), we get
d(S+I1+I2)=[A−d(S+I1+I2)−α1I1−α2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t)+σ1I1dB1(t)+σ2I2dB2(t). | (2.2.5) |
This equation has the solution
S(t)+I1(t)+I2(t)=Ad+[(S(0)+I1(0)+I2(0))−Ad]e−dt−α1∫t0e−d(t−s)I1(s)ds−α2∫t0e−d(t−s)I2(s)ds+M(t)≤Ad+[(S(0)+I1(0)+I2(0))−Ad]e−dt+M(t), | (2.2.6) |
where
M(t)=σ3∫t0e−d(t−s)S(s)dB3(s)+σ1∫t0e−d(t−s)I1(s)dB1(s)+σ2∫t0e−d(t−s)I2(s)dB2(s) |
is a continuous local martingale with
X(t)=X(0)+A(t)−U(t)+M(t), | (2.2.7) |
with
For convenience, we denote
M1(t)=σ1∫t0I1(s)dB1(s),M2(t)=σ2∫t0I2(s)dB2(s),M3(t)=σ3∫t0S(s)dB3(s),M4(t)=σ1∫t0dB1(s),M5(t)=σ2∫t0dB2(s),M6(t)=σ3∫t0dB3(s). | (2.2.8) |
Computing
limt→∞ρ1(t)=limt→∞∫t0σ21I21(s)ds(1+s)2≤σ21supt≥0{I21(t)}<∞. | (2.2.9) |
Then, by Lemma 2.2,
Lemma 2.6. For the solution
limsupt→∞⟨S(t)+I1(t)+I2(t)⟩<Ada.s. | (2.2.10) |
Proof. We set
Ma(t)=∫t0S(s)dB3(s),M∗a(t)=∫t0e−d(t−s)S(s)dB3(s),Mb(t)=∫t0I1(s)dB1(s),M∗b(t)=∫t0e−d(t−s)I1(s)dB1(s),Mc(t)=∫t0I2(s)dB2(s),M∗c(t)=∫t0e−d(t−s)I2(s)dB2(s). | (2.2.11) |
By Lemma 2.5, we have
limt→∞1tMa(t)=0,limt→∞1tM∗a(t)=0,limt→∞1tMb(t)=0,limt→∞1tM∗b(t)=0,limt→∞1tMc(t)=0,limt→∞1tM∗c(t)=0a.s. | (2.2.12) |
From (2.2.6), since
⟨M(t)⟩=σ3t∫t0∫s0e−d(s−u)S(u)dB3(u)ds+σ1t∫t0∫s0e−d(s−u)I1(u)dB1(u)ds+σ2t∫t0∫s0e−d(s−u)I2(u)dB2(u)ds=σ3t(∫t0S(u)dB3(u)−∫t0e−d(t−u)S(u)dB3(u))+σ1t(∫t0I1(u)dB1(u)−∫t0e−d(t−u)I1(u)dB1(u))+σ2t(∫t0I2(u)dB2(u)−∫t0e−d(t−u)I2(u)dB2(u)), | (2.2.13) |
by (2.2.12), we obtain
limt→∞1t∫t0[S(0)+I1(0)+I2(0)−Ad]e−dsds=limt→∞1dt{[S(0)+I1(0)+I2(0)−Ad](1−e−dt)}=0. | (2.2.14) |
By (2.2.6), (2.2.13) and (2.2.14), we obtain
limsupt→∞⟨S(t)+I1(t)+I2(t)⟩<Ada.s. |
This completes the proof.
Lemma 2.7. For any given initial value
Proof. Since the coefficients of system (2.2.2) are locally Lipschitz continuous, for any given initial value
Let
τk=inf{t∈[0,τe):S(t)≥k,I1(t)≥k,I2(t)≥k}, |
where throughout this paper we set
Define a
V(X)=S+I1+I2. |
By Itô's formula, we get
dV(X)=[A−dS−dI1−dI2−α1I1−α2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t)+σ1I1dB1(t)+σ2I2dB2(t)≜LVdt+σ3SdB3(t)+σ1I1dB1(t)+σ2I2dB2(t), |
where
LV=A−dS−dI1−dI2−α1I1−α2I2⩽A. |
For any
EV(X(T∧τk))=EV(X(S(0),I1(0),I2(0)))+E∫T∧τk0LV(X(s))ds⩽EV(X(S(0),I1(0),I2(0)))+AT, |
where
P(τ∞<∞)=0,P(τ∞=∞)=1. |
This completes the proof.
Theorem 2.8. Let
Proof. Define a function
dlnIi(t)=(βiS(t−τi)1+aiIi−(d+αi+ri)−12σ2i)dt+σidBi(t). | (2.2.15) |
Integrating (2.2.15) from 0 to
lnIi(t)=βit∫0S(r−τi)1+aiIidr−(d+αi+ri)t−12σ2it+σiBi(t)−σiBi(0)+lnIi(0)⩽βit∫0S(r−τi)dr−(d+αi+ri)t−12σ2it+σiBi(t)−σiBi(0)+lnIi(0)=βit∫0S(r)dr+βi0∫−τiS(r)dr−βit∫t−τiS(r)dr−(d+αi+ri)t−12σ2it++σiBi(t)−σiBi(0)+lnIi(0)≜βit∫0S(r)dr−(d+αi+ri)t−12σ2it+P(t), | (2.2.16) |
where
P(t)=βi0∫−τiS(r)dr−βit∫t−τiS(r)dr+σiBi(t)−σiBi(0)+lnIi(0). |
Dividing both sides of (2.2.16) by
lnIi(t)t⩽βi⟨S⟩−(d+αi+ri)−12σ2i+P(t)t. | (2.2.17) |
By integrating the model (2.2.2) and dividing the two sides by
{S(t)−S(0)t=A−d⟨S⟩−β1tt∫0S(r−τ1)I11+a1I1dr−β2tt∫0S(r−τ2)I21+a2I2dr+r1⟨I1⟩+r2⟨I2⟩+σ3tt∫0S(r)dB3(r),Ii(t)−Ii(0)t=βitt∫0S(r−τi)Ii1+aiIidr−(d+αi+ri)⟨Ii⟩+σitt∫0Ii(r)dBi(r). | (2.2.18) |
Calculating the sum of (2.2.18), we can assert that
S(t)−S(0)t+I1(t)−I1(0)t+I2(t)−I2(0)t=A−d⟨S⟩+r1⟨I1⟩+r2⟨I2⟩−(d+α1+r1)⟨I1⟩−(d+α2+r2)⟨I2⟩+σ3tt∫0S(r)dB3(r)+σ1tt∫0I1(r)dB1(r)+σ2tt∫0I2(r)dB2(r)≜A−d⟨S⟩−(d+α1)⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)⟨I2⟩+Wt, | (2.2.19) |
where
Wt=σ3tt∫0S(r)dB3(r)+σ1tt∫0I1(r)dB1(r)+σ2tt∫0I2(r)dB2(r). |
According to (2.2.19), we have
d⟨S⟩=A−(d+α1)⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)⟨I2⟩+Wt−S(t)−S(0)t−I1(t)−I1(0)t−I2(t)−I2(0)t. | (2.2.20) |
Putting (2.2.20) into (2.2.17), we obtain
lnIi(t)t⩽βi(Ad−(d+α1)d⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)d⟨I2⟩+Wtd−S(t)−S(0)td−I1(t)−I1(0)td−I2(t)−I2(0)td)−(d+αi+ri)−12σ2i+P(t)t. | (2.2.21) |
By Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 2.6, we get
limt→∞lnIi(t)t⩽βiAd−(d+αi+ri)−12σ2i−βi(d+α1)dlimt→∞⟨I1⟩−βi(d+α2)dlimt→∞⟨I2⟩⩽βiAd−(d+αi+ri)−12σ2i. | (2.2.22) |
That is, when
Theorem 2.9. Let
(i) If
liminft→∞⟨I1(t)⟩=1a1+β1(d+α1)d(d+α1+r1)(R∗1−1)>0. |
(ii) If
liminft→∞⟨I2(t)⟩=1a2+β2(d+α2)d(d+α2+r2)(R∗2−1)>0. |
(iii) If
liminft→∞⟨a2I1(t)+a1I2(t)⟩⩾1max{m1,m2}{a2(R∗1−1)+a1(R∗2−1)}>0, |
where
m1≜a1(d+α1)+β1d(d+α1)+a1β2(d+α1)a2d+a1r1,m2≜a2(d+α2)+β2d(d+α2)+a2β1(d+α2)a1d+a2r2. |
Proof. Firstly, we prove (ⅰ). From model (2.2.2), we obtain
dS=[A−dS−β1S(t−τ1)I11+a1I1−β2S(t−τ2)I21+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t)=[A−dS−β1a1S(t−τ1)+1a1β1S(t−τ1)1+a1I1−β2S(t−τ2)I21+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t). | (2.2.23) |
Integrating (2.2.23) and dividing the two sides by
S(t)−S(0)t=A−d⟨S⟩−[β1a1tt∫0S(r)dr+β1a1t0∫−τ1S(r)dr−β1a1tt∫t−τ1S(r)dr]+1a1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr−1tt∫0β2S(r−τ2)I21+a2I2dr+r1⟨I1⟩+r2⟨I2⟩+σ3tt∫0S(r)dB3(r)=A−d⟨S⟩−β1a1tt∫0S(r)dr+1a1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr+r1⟨I1⟩+r2⟨I2⟩−1tt∫0β2S(r−τ2)I21+a2I2dr−β1a1t0∫−τ1S(r)dr+β1a1tt∫t−τ1S(r)dr≜A−(d+β1a1)⟨S⟩+1a1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr+r1⟨I1⟩+Qt, | (2.2.24) |
where
Qt=−1tt∫0β2S(r−τ2)I21+a2I2dr−β1a1t0∫−τ1S(r)dr+β1a1tt∫t−τ1S(r)dr. |
By (2.2.24), we deduce
A−(d+β1a1)⟨S⟩+1a1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr+r1⟨I1⟩=S(t)−S(0)t−Qt≜Φt. | (2.2.25) |
From model (2.2.2), we also obtain
A−d⟨S⟩−(d+α1)⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)⟨I2⟩≜Θt, | (2.2.26) |
where
Θt=S(t)−S(0)+I1(t)−I1(0)+I2(t)−I2(0)−M1(t)−M2(t)−M3(t)t. |
Define function
lnI1(t)t=1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21+P(t)t. | (2.2.27) |
Putting (2.2.25) and (2.2.26) into (2.2.27), we obtain
lnI1(t)t=a1[−A+(d+β1a1)⟨S⟩−r1⟨I1⟩]−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21+P(t)t+a1Φt=−a1A+(a1d+β1)⟨S⟩−a1r1⟨I1⟩−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21+P(t)t+a1Φt=−a1A+(a1d+β1)[Ad−(d+α1)d⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)d⟨I2⟩−Θdt]−a1r1⟨I1⟩−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21+P(t)t+a1Φt=[Aβ1d−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21]−[a1d+a1α1+β1(d+α1)d+a1r1]⟨I1⟩−(a1d+β1)(d+α2)d⟨I2⟩−(a1d+β1)Θdt+P(t)t+a1Φt. | (2.2.28) |
According to Lemma 2.3, Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 2.6, when
limt→∞⟨I1⟩=λλ0=Aβ1d−(d+α1+r1)−12σ21a1d+a1α1+β1(d+α1)d+a1r1=1a1+β1(d+α1)d(d+α1+r1)(R∗1−1)>0. |
This completes the proof of (ⅰ).
(ii) The proof of (ⅱ) is similar to that of (ⅰ).
(iii) From model (2.2.2), we get
dS=[A−dS−β1S(t−τ1)I11+a1I1−β2S(t−τ2)I21+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t)=[A−dS−β1a1S(t−τ1)+1a1β1S(t−τ1)1+a1I1−β2a2S(t−τ2)+1a2β2S(t−τ2)1+a2I2+r1I1+r2I2]dt+σ3SdB3(t). | (2.2.29) |
Similar to (2.2.23)-(2.2.25), integrating (2.2.29) yields
A−(d+β1a1+β2a2)⟨S⟩+1a1tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr+1a2tt∫0β2S(r−τ2)1+a2I2dr+r1⟨I1⟩+r2⟨I2⟩=S(t)−S(0)t−Qt≜Ψt. | (2.2.30) |
From model (2.2.2), we also get
A−d⟨S⟩−(d+α1)⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)⟨I2⟩≜Θt, | (2.2.31) |
where
Θt=S(t)−S(0)+I1(t)−I1(0)+I2(t)−I2(0)−M1(t)−M2(t)−M3(t)t. |
Define the function
ln(a2I1(t)+a1I2(t))t=a2tt∫0β1S(r−τ1)1+a1I1dr+a1tt∫0β2S(r−τ2)1+a2I2dr−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22+a2M1(t)t+a1M2(t)t. | (2.2.32) |
Substituting (2.2.30) and (2.2.31) into (2.2.32), we get
ln(a2I1(t)+a1I2(t))t=−a1a2A+a1a2(d+β1a1+β2a2)⟨S⟩−a1a2r1⟨I1⟩−a1a2r2⟨I2⟩+a1a2Ψt−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22+a2M1(t)t+a1M2(t)t≜−a1a2A−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22+(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)⟨S⟩−a1a2r1⟨I1⟩−a1a2r2⟨I2⟩+Υt=−a1a2A−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22+(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)[Ad−(d+α1)d⟨I1⟩−(d+α2)d⟨I2⟩−Θdt]−a1a2r1⟨I1⟩−a1a2r2⟨I2⟩+Υt=[Ad(a2β1+a1β2)−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22]−[(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)(d+α1)d+a1a2r1]⟨I1⟩−[(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)(d+α2)d+a1a2r2]⟨I2⟩−(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)Θdt+Υt. | (2.2.33) |
Then we obtain
ln(a2I1(t)+a1I2(t))t⩾[Ad(a2β1+a1β2)−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22]−max{m1,m2}[a2⟨I1⟩+a1⟨I2⟩]−(a1a2d+a2β1+a1β2)Θdt+Υt, | (2.2.34) |
where
m1≜a1(d+α1)+β1d(d+α1)+a1β2(d+α1)a2d+a1r1,m2≜a2(d+α2)+β2d(d+α2)+a2β1(d+α2)a1d+a2r2. |
By Lemma 2.3, Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 2.6, we take the limit on both sides of (2.2.34) to get
liminft→∞⟨a2I1(t)+a1I2(t)⟩⩾λλ0=Ad(a2β1+a1β2)−a2(d+α1+r1)−a1(d+α2+r2)−12a2σ21−12a1σ22max{m1,m2}=1max{m1,m2}{a2(R∗1−1)+a1(R∗2−1)}>0. |
This completes the proof.
From Theorem 2.8 and Theorem 2.9, we can claim that the thresholds
In this section, basing on the model (2.2.1) and (2.2.2), we do a case study for HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea in Yunnan Province, China. The transmission routes of these two kinds of diseases are close to those of the main infected population. The main transmission modes are as follows: sexual transmission, blood transmission, mother to child transmission. According to the report data [26]: The cumulative number HIV positives reported at the end of September 2018 was 850,000, including 260,000 recorded deaths in China, and the estimated number living with HIV/AIDS was 36.9 million around the world. At present, there are many papers about the spread of HIV/AIDS. The basic mathematical models of HIV/AIDS in-host has been developed to describe interactions between immune system and viruses [21]. In [7] and [16], a class of HIV/AIDS model with time delay and a class of HIV/AIDS model with age structure are studied respectively. In [15], a cell-to-cell transmission model of HIV/AIDS is studied. There are few literatures about Gonorrhea, the way of transmission is similar to AIDS, and its harm is not as serious as AIDS. Gonorrhea is a purulent inflammatory disease of genitourinary system caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. It is also because the transmission route and AIDS are similar, so it is necessary to study the co-infection model of these two infectious diseases. Yunnan is located in southwest of China, bordering the countries of Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam. According to the sixth national census in 2011 [17], there are 45,596,000 people in Yunnan. From the cumulative number of HIV/AIDS infections in Yunnan Province in 2007 [26], combining with the number of newly increased infections and deaths of HIV/AIDS from 2007 to 2016 [18], the cumulative number of HIV/AIDS infections in Yunnan Province from 2007 to 2016 is obtained (see Table 1). In addition, the number of Gonorrhea infections increased annually from 2007 to 2016 in Yunnan Province [18] is shown in Table 1.
Year | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
HIV/AIDS | 57325 | 64460 | 71852 | 78613 | 85999 |
Gonorrhea | 2358 | 2230 | 1818 | 1819 | 1720 |
Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
HIV/AIDS | 92666 | 98555 | 104903 | 111351 | 117817 |
Gonorrhea | 1893 | 1643 | 2104 | 3028 | 4098 |
Using Eviews 7.0, we will test the stationarity of the data for the number of people infected with HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea from 2007 to 2016 in Yunnan Province, respectively. The autocorrelation and partial correlation coefficients of the test results show that the data series is stable and the statistics are good. Next, the parameters of the model (2.2.2) are further determined for fitting. The specific idea is that part of the parameters are based on the known literatures and some biological values, and then, based on the data in Table 1 and the parameters obtained, the least square method is used to fit the model to estimate the remaining parameters. For the natural mortality of people in Yunnan Province, we choose
Parameters | Definition | Value | Source |
A | Recruitment rate for the susceptible population | 92136 | Estimated |
d | Natural mortality rate | 0.0149 | [6] |
Death rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.7114 | [26] | |
Death rate for Gonorrhea | 0.3 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.79 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for Gonorrhea | 0.99994 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for Gonorrhea | 0.25 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of HIV/AIDS on transmission | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of Gonorrhea on transmission | 1 | Estimated | |
Incubation period of AIDS | 8 year | [26] | |
Incubation period of Gonorrhea | 0 | [18] | |
Initial value of susceptible population | 80000 | Estimated | |
Initial value of HIV/AIDS patients | 57325 | [26] | |
Initial value of Gonorrhea patients | 12358 | Estimated |
When the parameters in Table 2 are substituted into the two thresholds of the model (2.2.1), they are both greater than unity, that is, both diseases are persistent. To illustrate the significance of model (2.2.2) in disease control, we first describe the dependence of each parameter in thresholds
According to the results of PRCC, we take the following values:
The fluctuation of natural environment will bring variability to biological system [20]. And environmental changes have a vital impact on the development of epidemics. Variability of temperature and rainfall may cause significant fluctuations in the dynamics of pathogenic fungi [22,8]. In terms of human disease, the nature of epidemic spread and growth is inherently random due to the unpredictability of person-to-person contacts [11,24]. Therefore, the variability and randomness of the environment are introduced into the epidemic model [20]. In general, the threshold of the model is a very important quantity for theoretical analysis of differential equation models describing infectious diseases. That is to say, the relationship between the threshold and 1 is used to analyze whether the disease is extinct or not. Therefore, in this paper, we discuss two classes of differential equations models. Specifically in each class of models, considering the introduction of randomness and time-delays, the change of infection rate, the existence of immunity loss and so on, then we theoretically analyze the thresholds changes in each class. We obtain the sufficient conditions for the extinction and persistence of diseases. In addition, we do a case study of (2.2.1) and (2.2.2), and we also carry out some numerical simulations aiming to HIV/AIDS and Gonorrhea transmission in Yunnan by using the models.
Through the case study, the results of numerical simulation and theoretical analysis are consistent, i.e., when
Another possible and important extension for future work is that there is a class of stochastic model and its corresponding deterministic model, and the threshold of the stochastic model is larger than that of the deterministic model. That is, when the threshold of the stochastic model is greater than 1 and then greater than the threshold of the deterministic model, the disease of the deterministic model will be extinct, but the disease of the stochastic model will be persistent. This is the risk of introducing random noises into the deterministic models for the infectious diseases models, but for the population models, this can maintain the growth of the population, so it is very meaningful to study this problem. All the aforementioned possible extensions are interesting, biologically important but yet mathematically challenging, and we have to leave them for future research projects.
We are grateful to reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which greatly improved the presentation of this paper.
[1] |
An introduction to stochastic epidemic models. Mathematical epidemiology, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (2008) 1945: 81-130. ![]() |
[2] |
A stochastic threshold for an epidemic model with Beddington-DeAngelis incidence, delayed loss of immunity and Lévy noise perturbation. Phys. A (2018) 507: 312-320. ![]() |
[3] |
Stochastic epidemic models: A survey. Math. Biosci. (2010) 225: 24-35. ![]() |
[4] |
The global dynamics for a stochastic SIS epidemic model with isolation. Phys. A (2018) 492: 1604-1624. ![]() |
[5] |
A class of stochastic delayed SIR epidemic models with generalized nonlinear incidence rate and temporary immunity. Phys. A (2017) 481: 198-208. ![]() |
[6] | Correction for life expectation of population and mortality of infant in Yunnan. Maternal and Child Health Care of China (2005) 20: 681-685. |
[7] |
Joint effects of mitosis and intracellular delay on viral dynamics: Two-parameter bifurcation analysis. J. Math. Biol. (2012) 64: 1005-1020. ![]() |
[8] |
Global asymptotic stability of stochastic Lotka-Volterra systems with infinite delays. IMA J. Appl. Math. (2015) 80: 1431-1453. ![]() |
[9] |
Dynamics of positive solutions to SIR and SEIR epidemic models with saturated incidence rates. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. (2013) 14: 1286-1299. ![]() |
[10] |
Asymptotic stability of a two-group stochastic SEIR model with infinite delays. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. (2014) 19: 3444-3453. ![]() |
[11] |
Analysis of the deterministic and stochastic SIRS epidemic models with nonlinear incidence. Phys. A (2015) 428: 140-153. ![]() |
[12] |
Stationary distribution of a stochastic delayed SVEIR epidemic model with vaccination and saturation incidence. Phys. A (2018) 512: 849-863. ![]() |
[13] |
Environmental Brownian noise suppresses explosions in population dynamics. Stochastic Process. Appl. (2002) 97: 95-110. ![]() |
[14] |
Dynamics of a novel nonlinear stochastic SIS epidemic model with double epidemic hypothesis. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (2016) 433: 227-242. ![]() |
[15] | HIV cell-to-cell transmission requires the production of infectious virus particles, and does not proceed through Env-mediated fusion pores. Journal of Virology (2012) 86: 3924-3933. |
[16] |
An age-structured model of HIV infection that allows for variations in the production rate of viral particles and the death rate of productively infected cells. Math. Biosci. Eng. (2004) 1: 267-288. ![]() |
[17] | Yunnan Bureau of Satistic, The Sixth National Census Data Bulletin in Yunnan Province 2010, Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/dfrkpcgb/201202/t20120228_30408.html. |
[18] | The Data-center of China Public Health, Available from: http://www.phsciencedata.cn/. |
[19] |
Parasite population delay model of malaria type with stochastic perturbation and environmental criterion for limitation of disease. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (2009) 360: 624-630. ![]() |
[20] |
Response of a deterministic epidemiological system to a stochastically varying environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2003) 100: 9067-9072. ![]() |
[21] |
An intra-host mathematical model on interaction between HIV and malaria. Bull. Math. Biol. (2010) 72: 1892-1911. ![]() |
[22] |
Entire solutions for nonlocal dispersal equations with bistable nonlinearity: Asymmetric case. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) (2019) 35: 1771-1794. ![]() |
[23] | Mathematical analysis and simulation of a Hepatitis B model with time delay: A case study for Xinjiang, China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering (2019) 17: 1757-1775. |
[24] |
Application of stochastic inequalities to global analysis of a nonlinear stochastic SIRS epidemic model with saturated treatment function. Adv. Difference Equ. (2018) 2018: 50-71. ![]() |
[25] |
Mathematical modeling for schistosomiasis with seasonal influence: A case study in Hubei, China. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. (2020) 19: 1438-1471. ![]() |
[26] |
Mathematical model of transmission dynamics of human immune-deficiency virus: A case study for Yunnan, China. Appl. Math. Model. (2016) 40: 4859-4875. ![]() |
[27] |
Study on the threshold of a stochastic SIR epidemic model and its extensions. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. (2016) 38: 172-177. ![]() |
1. | Muhammad Shoaib, Nabeela Anwar, Iftikhar Ahmad, Shafaq Naz, Adiqa Kausar Kiani, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Intelligent networks knacks for numerical treatment of nonlinear multi-delays SVEIR epidemic systems with vaccination, 2022, 36, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979222501004 | |
2. | Lijuan Niu, Qiaoling Chen, Zhidong Teng, Threshold Dynamics and Probability Density Function of a Stochastic Multi-Strain Coinfection Model with Amplification and Vaccination, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-00957-6 |
Year | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
HIV/AIDS | 57325 | 64460 | 71852 | 78613 | 85999 |
Gonorrhea | 2358 | 2230 | 1818 | 1819 | 1720 |
Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
HIV/AIDS | 92666 | 98555 | 104903 | 111351 | 117817 |
Gonorrhea | 1893 | 1643 | 2104 | 3028 | 4098 |
Parameters | Definition | Value | Source |
A | Recruitment rate for the susceptible population | 92136 | Estimated |
d | Natural mortality rate | 0.0149 | [6] |
Death rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.7114 | [26] | |
Death rate for Gonorrhea | 0.3 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.79 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for Gonorrhea | 0.99994 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for Gonorrhea | 0.25 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of HIV/AIDS on transmission | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of Gonorrhea on transmission | 1 | Estimated | |
Incubation period of AIDS | 8 year | [26] | |
Incubation period of Gonorrhea | 0 | [18] | |
Initial value of susceptible population | 80000 | Estimated | |
Initial value of HIV/AIDS patients | 57325 | [26] | |
Initial value of Gonorrhea patients | 12358 | Estimated |
Year | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
HIV/AIDS | 57325 | 64460 | 71852 | 78613 | 85999 |
Gonorrhea | 2358 | 2230 | 1818 | 1819 | 1720 |
Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
HIV/AIDS | 92666 | 98555 | 104903 | 111351 | 117817 |
Gonorrhea | 1893 | 1643 | 2104 | 3028 | 4098 |
Parameters | Definition | Value | Source |
A | Recruitment rate for the susceptible population | 92136 | Estimated |
d | Natural mortality rate | 0.0149 | [6] |
Death rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.7114 | [26] | |
Death rate for Gonorrhea | 0.3 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.79 | Estimated | |
Cure rate for Gonorrhea | 0.99994 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for HIV/AIDS | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Infection rate for Gonorrhea | 0.25 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of HIV/AIDS on transmission | 0.9 | Estimated | |
Inhibition rate of Gonorrhea on transmission | 1 | Estimated | |
Incubation period of AIDS | 8 year | [26] | |
Incubation period of Gonorrhea | 0 | [18] | |
Initial value of susceptible population | 80000 | Estimated | |
Initial value of HIV/AIDS patients | 57325 | [26] | |
Initial value of Gonorrhea patients | 12358 | Estimated |