Research article Special Issues

Significant factors affecting public transport use for leisure travel and tourism

  • Received: 16 May 2022 Revised: 16 October 2022 Accepted: 14 November 2022 Published: 28 December 2022
  • Tourists' preferences for public transport at destinations are homogeneous, while the choice of private transport services is heterogeneous. This paper examined several facets of the existing public transport system to understand tourists' disapproval of the mode choice for pleasurable holiday travel in Lagos, Nigeria. The urban transport services were adjudged based on tourists' perceptions of satisfaction with service features related to mode choice. Statistical and structured analyses were used to explore the association between usage decisions and satisfaction with public transport services. The link between mode choice tolerability and usage decisions was identified using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified three (3) main factors comprising 16 service dimensions influencing the choice of public transport. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Barlett tests confirmed the sampling adequacy for each variable in each factor and the combined elements. The analyses quantified the association between variables and tourists' usage decisions. The relationship between satisfaction and the variables explained the variation in satisfaction with the quality aspects of public transportation. Thus, the findings expressly explained tourists' usual dissatisfaction with Lagos public transport system for leisure excursions.

    Citation: Olakunle Oloruntobi, Safizahanin Mokhtar, Muhammad Zaly Shah, Kasypi Mokhtar. Significant factors affecting public transport use for leisure travel and tourism[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 63-81. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023004

    Related Papers:

    [1] P. Pirmohabbati, A. H. Refahi Sheikhani, H. Saberi Najafi, A. Abdolahzadeh Ziabari . Numerical solution of full fractional Duffing equations with Cubic-Quintic-Heptic nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1621-1641. doi: 10.3934/math.2020110
    [2] SAIRA, Wenxiu Ma, Suliman Khan . An efficient numerical method for highly oscillatory logarithmic-algebraic singular integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 4899-4914. doi: 10.3934/math.2025224
    [3] Kai Wang, Guicang Zhang . Curve construction based on quartic Bernstein-like basis. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5344-5363. doi: 10.3934/math.2020343
    [4] Taher S. Hassan, Amir Abdel Menaem, Hasan Nihal Zaidi, Khalid Alenzi, Bassant M. El-Matary . Improved Kneser-type oscillation criterion for half-linear dynamic equations on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29425-29438. doi: 10.3934/math.20241426
    [5] Dexin Meng . Wronskian-type determinant solutions of the nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2652-2667. doi: 10.3934/math.2025124
    [6] Samia BiBi, Md Yushalify Misro, Muhammad Abbas . Smooth path planning via cubic GHT-Bézier spiral curves based on shortest distance, bending energy and curvature variation energy. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8625-8641. doi: 10.3934/math.2021501
    [7] Chunli Li, Wenchang Chu . Remarkable series concerning $ \binom{3n}{n} $ and harmonic numbers in numerators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17234-17258. doi: 10.3934/math.2024837
    [8] Beatriz Campos, Alicia Cordero, Juan R. Torregrosa, Pura Vindel . Dynamical analysis of an iterative method with memory on a family of third-degree polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6445-6466. doi: 10.3934/math.2022359
    [9] A. Palanisamy, J. Alzabut, V. Muthulakshmi, S. S. Santra, K. Nonlaopon . Oscillation results for a fractional partial differential system with damping and forcing terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4261-4279. doi: 10.3934/math.2023212
    [10] Tongzhu Li, Ruiyang Lin . Classification of Möbius homogeneous curves in $ \mathbb{R}^4 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23027-23046. doi: 10.3934/math.20241119
  • Tourists' preferences for public transport at destinations are homogeneous, while the choice of private transport services is heterogeneous. This paper examined several facets of the existing public transport system to understand tourists' disapproval of the mode choice for pleasurable holiday travel in Lagos, Nigeria. The urban transport services were adjudged based on tourists' perceptions of satisfaction with service features related to mode choice. Statistical and structured analyses were used to explore the association between usage decisions and satisfaction with public transport services. The link between mode choice tolerability and usage decisions was identified using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified three (3) main factors comprising 16 service dimensions influencing the choice of public transport. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Barlett tests confirmed the sampling adequacy for each variable in each factor and the combined elements. The analyses quantified the association between variables and tourists' usage decisions. The relationship between satisfaction and the variables explained the variation in satisfaction with the quality aspects of public transportation. Thus, the findings expressly explained tourists' usual dissatisfaction with Lagos public transport system for leisure excursions.



    We consider the following family of nonlinear oscillators

    yzz+k(y)y3z+h(y)y2z+f(y)yz+g(y)=0, (1.1)

    where k, h, f0 and g0 are arbitrary sufficiently smooth functions. Particular members of (1.1) are used for the description of various processes in physics, mechanics and so on and they also appear as invariant reductions of nonlinear partial differential equations [1,2,3].

    Integrability of (1.1) was studied in a number of works [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In particular, in [15] linearization of (1.1) via the following generalized nonlocal transformations

    w=F(y),dζ=(G1(y)yz+G2(y))dz. (1.2)

    was considered. However, equivalence problems with respect to transformations (1.2) for (1.1) and its integrable nonlinear subcases have not been studied previously. Therefore, in this work we deal with the equivalence problem for (1.1) and its integrable subcase from the Painlevé-Gambier classification. Namely, we construct an equivalence criterion for (1.1) and a non-canonical form of Ince Ⅶ equation [17,18]. As a result, we obtain two new integrable subfamilies of (1.1). What is more, we demonstrate that for any equation from (1.1) that satisfy one of these equivalence criteria one can construct an autonomous first integral in the parametric form. Notice that we use Ince Ⅶ equation because it is one of the simplest integrable members of (1.1) with known general solution and known classification of invariant curves.

    Moreover, we show that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for equations from (1.1). Since the considered non-canonical form of Ince Ⅶ equation admits two irreducible polynomial invariant curves, we obtain that any equation from (1.1), which is equivalent to it, also admits two invariant curves. These invariant curves can be used for constructing an integrating factor for equations from (1.1) that are equivalent to Ince Ⅶ equation. If this integrating factor is Darboux one, then the corresponding equation is Liouvillian integrable [19]. This demonstrates the connection between nonlocal equivalence approach and Darboux integrability theory and its generalizations, which has been recently discussed for a less general class of nonlocal transformations in [20,21,22].

    The rest of this work is organized as follows. In the next Section we present an equivalence criterion for (1.1) and a non-canonical form of the Ince Ⅶ equation. In addition, we show how to construct an autonomous first integral for an equation from (1.1) satisfying this equivalence criterion. We also demonstrate that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for (1.1). In Section 3 we provide two examples of integrable equations from (1.1) and construct their parametric first integrals, invariant curves and integrating factors. In the last Section we briefly discuss and summarize our results.

    We begin with the equivalence criterion between (1.1) and a non-canonical form of the Ince Ⅶ equation, that is [17,18]

    wζζ+3wζ+ϵw3+2w=0. (2.1)

    Here ϵ0 is an arbitrary parameter, which can be set, without loss of generality, to be equal to ±1.

    The general solution of (1.1) is

    w=e(ζζ0)cn{ϵ(e(ζζ0)C1),12}. (2.2)

    Here ζ0 and C1 are arbitrary constants and cn is the Jacobian elliptic cosine. Expression (2.2) will be used below for constructing autonomous parametric first integrals for members of (1.1).

    The equivalence criterion between (1.1) and (2.1) can be formulated as follows:

    Theorem 2.1. Equation (1.1) is equivalent to (2.1) if and only if either

    (I)25515lgp2qy+2352980l10+(3430q6667920p3)l514580qp310q276545lgqppy=0, (2.3)

    or

    (II)343l5972p3=0, (2.4)

    holds. Here

    l=9(fgygfy+fgh3kg2)2f3,p=gly3lgy+l(f23gh),q=25515gylp25103lgppy+686l58505p2(f23gh)l+6561p3. (2.5)

    The expression for G2 in each case is either

    (I)G2=126l2qp2470596l10(1333584p3+1372q)l5+q2, (2.6)

    or

    (II)G22=49l3G2+9p2189pl. (2.7)

    In all cases the functions F and G1 are given by

    F2=l81ϵG32,G1=G2(f3G2)3g. (2.8)

    Proof. We begin with the necessary conditions. Substituting (1.2) into (2.1) we get

    yzz+k(y)y3z+h(y)y2z+f(y)yz+g(y)=0, (2.9)

    where

    k=FG31(ϵF2+2)+3G21Fy+G1FyyFyG1,yG2Fy,h=G2Fyy+(6G1G2G2,y)Fy+3FG2G21(ϵF2+2)G2Fy,f=3G2(Fy+FG1(ϵF2+2))Fy,g=FG22(ϵF2+2)Fy. (2.10)

    As a consequence, we obtain that (1.1) can be transformed into (2.1) if it is of the form (2.9) (or (1.1)).

    Conversely, if the functions F, G1 and G2 satisfy (2.10) for some values of k, h, f and g, then (1.1) can be mapped into (2.1) via (1.2). Thus, we see that the compatibility conditions for (2.10) as an overdertmined system of equations for F, G1 and G2 result in the necessary and sufficient conditions for (1.1) to be equivalent to (2.1) via (1.2).

    To obtain the compatibility conditions, we simplify system (2.10) as follows. Using the last two equations from (2.10) we find the expression for G1 given in (2.8). Then, with the help of this relation, from (2.10) we find that

    81ϵF2G32l=0, (2.11)

    and

    567lG32+(243lgh81lf281gly+243lgy)G27l2=0,243lgG2,y+324lG3281glyG2+2l2=0, (2.12)

    Here l is given by (2.5).

    As a result, we need to find compatibility conditions only for (2.12). In order to find the generic case of this compatibility conditions, we differentiate the first equation twice and find the expression for G22 and condition (2.3). Differentiating the first equation from (2.12) for the third time, we obtain (2.6). Further differentiation does not lead to any new compatibility conditions. Particular case (2.4) can be treated in the similar way.

    Finally, we remark that the cases of l=0, p=0 and q=0 result in the degeneration of transformations (1.2). This completes the proof.

    As an immediate corollary of Theorem 2.1 we get

    Corollary 2.1. If coefficients of an equation from (1.1) satisfy either (2.3) or (2.4), then an autonomous first integral of this equation can be presented in the parametric form as follows:

    y=F1(w),yz=G2wζFyG1wζ. (2.13)

    Here w is the general solution of (2.1) given by (2.2). Notice also that, formally, (2.13) contains two arbitrary constants, namely ζ0 and C1. However, without loss of generality, one of them can be set equal to zero.

    Now we demonstrate that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for equations from (1.1).

    First, we need to introduce the definition of an invariant curve for (1.1). We recall that Eq (1.1) can be transformed into an equivalent dynamical system

    yz=P,uz=Q,P=u,Q=ku3hu2fug. (2.14)

    A smooth function H(y,u) is called an invariant curve of (2.14) (or, equivalently, of (1.1)), if it is a nontrivial solution of [19]

    PHy+QHu=λH, (2.15)

    for some value of the function λ, which is called the cofactor of H.

    Second, we need to introduce the equation that is equivalent to (1.1) via (1.2). Substituting (1.2) into (1.1) we get

    wζζ+˜kw3ζ+˜hw2ζ+˜fwζ+˜g=0, (2.16)

    where

    ˜k=kG32gG31+(G1,yhG1)G22+(fG1G2,y)G1G2F2yG22,˜h=(hFyFyy)G22(2fG1G2,y)G2Fy+3gG21FyF2yG22,˜f=fG23gG1G22,˜g=gFyG22. (2.17)

    An invariant curve for (2.16) can be defined in the same way as that for (1.1). Notice that, further, we will denote wζ as v.

    Theorem 2.2. Suppose that either (1.1) possess an invariant curve H(y,u) with the cofactor λ(y,u) or (2.16) possess an invariant curve ˜H(w,v) with the cofactor ˜λ(w,v). Then, the other equation also has an invariant curve and the corresponding invariant curves and cofactors are connected via

    H(y,u)=˜H(F,FyuG1u+G2),λ(y,u)=(G1u+G2)˜λ(F,FyuG1u+G2). (2.18)

    Proof. Suppose that ˜H(w,v) is an invariant curve for (2.16) with the cofactor ˜λ(w,v). Then it satisfies

    v˜Hw+(˜kv3˜hv2˜fv˜g)˜Hv=˜λ˜H. (2.19)

    Substituting (1.2) into (2.19) we get

    uHy+(ku3hu2fug)H=(G1u+G2)˜λ(F,FyuG1u+G2)H. (2.20)

    This completes the proof.

    As an immediate consequence of Theorem 2.2 we have that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous first integrals admitted by members of (1.1), since they are invariant curves with zero cofactors.

    Another corollary of Theorem 2.2 is that any equation from (1.1) that is connected to (2.1) admits two invariant curves that correspond to irreducible polynomial invariant curves of (2.1). This invariant curves of (2.1) and the corresponding cofactors are the following (see, [23] formulas (3.18) and (3.19) taking into account scaling transformations)

    ˜H=±i2ϵ(v+w)+w2,˜λ=±2ϵw2. (2.21)

    Therefore, we have that the following statement holds:

    Corollary 2.2. If coefficients of an equation from (1.1) satisfy either (2.3) or (2.4), then is admits the following invariant curves with the corresponding cofactors

    H=±i2ϵ(FyuG1u+G2+F)+F2,λ=(G1u+G2)(±2ϵF2). (2.22)

    Let us remark that connections between (2.1) and non-autonomous variants of (1.1) can be considered via a non-autonomous generalization of transformations (1.2). However, one of two nonlocally related equations should be autonomous since otherwise nonlocal transformations do not map a differential equation into a differential equation [5].

    In this Section we have obtained the equivalence criterion between (1.1) and (2.1), that defines two new completely integrable subfamilies of (1.1). We have also demonstrated that members of these subfamilies posses an autonomous parametric first integral and two autonomous invariant curves.

    In this Section we provide two examples of integrable equations from (1.1) satisfying integrability conditions from Theorem 2.1.

    Example 1. One can show that the coefficients of the following cubic oscillator

    yzz12ϵμy(ϵμ2y4+2)2y3z6μyyz+2μ2y3(ϵμ2y4+2)=0, (3.1)

    satisfy condition (2.3) from Theorem 2.1. Consequently, Eq (3.1) is completely integrable and its general solution can be obtained from (2.2) by inverting transformations (1.2). However, it is more convenient to use Corollary 2.1 and present the autonomous first integral of (3.1) in the parametric form as follows:

    y=±wμ,yz=w(ϵw2+2)wζ2wζ+w(ϵw2+2), (3.2)

    where w is given by (2.2), ζ is considered as a parameter and ζ0, without loss of generality, can be set equal to zero. As a result, we see that (3.1) is integrable since it has an autonomous first integral.

    Moreover, using Corollary 2.2 one can find invariant curves admitted by (3.1)

    H1,2=y4[(2±ϵμy2)2(2ϵμy2)+2(ϵμy22ϵ)u]2μ2y2(ϵμ2y4+2)4u,λ1,2=±2(μy2(ϵμ2y4+2)2u)(2ϵμy22)y(ϵμ2y4+2) (3.3)

    With the help of the standard technique of the Darboux integrability theory [19], it is easy to find the corresponding Darboux integrating factor of (3.1)

    M=(ϵμ2y4+2)94(2ϵu2+(ϵμ2y4+2)2)34(μy2(ϵμ2y4+2)2u)32. (3.4)

    Consequently, equation is (3.1) Liouvillian integrable.

    Example 2. Consider the Liénard (1, 9) equation

    yzz+(biyi)yz+ajyj=0,i=0,4,j=0,,9. (3.5)

    Here summation over repeated indices is assumed. One can show that this equation is equivalent to (2.1) if it is of the form

    yzz9(y+μ)(y+3μ)3yz+2y(2y+3μ)(y+3μ)7=0, (3.6)

    where μ is an arbitrary constant.

    With the help of Corollary 2.1 one can present the first integral of (3.6) in the parametric form as follows:

    y=32ϵμw22ϵw,yz=77762ϵμ5wwζ(2ϵw2)5(2ϵwζ+(2ϵw+2ϵ)w), (3.7)

    where w is given by (2.2). Thus, one can see that (3.5) is completely integrable due to the existence of this parametric autonomous first integral.

    Using Corollary 2.2 we find two invariant curves of (3.6):

    H1=y2[(2y+3μ)(y+3μ)42u)](y+3μ)2[(y+3μ)4yu],λ1=6μ(uy(y+3μ)4)y(y+3μ), (3.8)

    and

    H2=y2(y+3μ)2y(y+3μ)4u,λ2=2(2y+3μ)(u2y(y+3μ)4)y(y+3μ). (3.9)

    The corresponding Darboux integrating factor is

    M=[y(y+3μ)4u]32[(2y+3μ)(y+3μ)42u]34. (3.10)

    As a consequence, we see that Eq (3.6) is Liouvillian integrable.

    Therefore, we see that equations considered in Examples 1 and 2 are completely integrable from two points of view. First, they possess autonomous parametric first integrals. Second, they have Darboux integrating factors.

    In this work we have considered the equivalence problem between family of Eqs (1.1) and its integrable member (2.1), with equivalence transformations given by generalized nonlocal transformations (1.2). We construct the corresponding equivalence criterion in the explicit form, which leads to two new integrable subfamilies of (1.1). We have demonstrated that one can explicitly construct a parametric autonomous first integral for each equation that is equivalent to (2.1) via (1.2). We have also shown that transformations (1.2) preserve autonomous invariant curves for (1.1). As a consequence, we have obtained that equations from the obtained integrable subfamilies posses two autonomous invariant curves, which corresponds to the irreducible polynomial invariant curves of (2.1). This fact demonstrate a connection between nonlocal equivalence approach and Darboux and Liouvillian integrability approach. We have illustrate our results by two examples of integrable equations from (1.1).

    The author was partially supported by Russian Science Foundation grant 19-71-10003.

    The author declares no conflict of interest in this paper.



    [1] Dubois G, Peeters P, Ceron JP, et al. (2011) The future tourism mobility of the world population: Emission growth versus climate policy. Transport Res A: Pol 45: 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.004
    [2] Yuksek G, AkkoÇ IT, Bayer RU (2016) The effects of public transport performance on destination satisfaction. Afr J Hospitality, Tourism Leisure 5: 1–12.
    [3] Bauder M, Freytag T (2015) Visitor mobility in the city and the effects of travel preparation. Tourism Geogr 17: 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971 doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971
    [4] Shimauchi T (2020) Reinventing public transport system in Luxembourg and its implications for foreign tourists. J Global Tour Res 5: 161–166. https://doi.org/10.37020/jgtr.5.2_161 doi: 10.37020/jgtr.5.2_161
    [5] Peeters P, Higham J, Cohen S, et al. (2019) Desirable tourism transport futures. J Sustain Tour 27: 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1477785 doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1477785
    [6] Holden E (2016) In: Achieving sustainable mobility: Everyday and leisure-time travel in the EU, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315565491
    [7] Chiou YC, Jou RC, Yang CH (2015) Factors affecting public transportation usage rate: Geographically weighted regression. Transport Res A: Pol 78: 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.016
    [8] Nwachukwu AA, Gladys NI, Chikezie OK (2019) Tourists' satisfaction with public transport services in Lagos, Nigeria. AUC Geogr 54: 67–80. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2019.7 doi: 10.14712/23361980.2019.7
    [9] Oloruntobi OO, Safizahanin M, Zaly-Shah M (2019) Tourists perception of public transit services for leisure travel satisfaction in Lagos. IJRTE 8: 5702–5709. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8370.118419 doi: 10.35940/ijrte.D8370.118419
    [10] Mathilde C (2021) Number of Buses for Transportation of Tourists in Mexico in 2019, by State. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/858208/number-tourist-transport-buses-mexico-state/.
    [11] Bajada T, Titheridge H (2017) The attitudes of tourists towards a bus service: Implications for policy from a Maltese case study. Transp Res Procedia 25: 4110–4129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.342 doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.342
    [12] Prayag G, Cohen SA, Yan HL (2015) Potential Chinese travellers to Western Europe: Segmenting motivations and service expectations. Curr Issues Tour 18: 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.868413 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.868413
    [13] Antoniou C, Tyrinopoulos Y (2013) Factors affecting public transport use in touristic areas. Int J Transp 1: 91–112. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.06 doi: 10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.06
    [14] Pawlasová P (2015) The factors influencing satisfaction with public city transport: A structural equation modelling approach. J Competitiveness 7: 18–32. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2015.04.02 doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.04.02
    [15] Van Lierop D, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM (2018) What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Rev 38: 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683 doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
    [16] Hall CM, Le-Klähn DT, Ram Y (2017) In: Tourism, public transport and sustainable mobility, Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845415990
    [17] Langkaweekate H, Anantamongkolkul C, Supornhemhiran N, et al. (2021) Tourists' satisfaction of public transport use in Phuket. JITT 17: 1–17. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jitt/article/view/245304
    [18] Gutiérrez A, Miravet D (2016) The determinants of tourist use of public transport at the destination. Sustainability 8: 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090908 doi: 10.3390/su8090908
    [19] Wang ZF (2014) Tourists' perception of urban public transport, satisfaction and behavioral intention in Zhangjiajie city, China. Geogr Res 33: 978–987. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201405015 doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405015
    [20] Aktaş A, Çevirgen A, Toker B (2009) Assessing holiday satisfaction of German and Russian tourists visiting Alanya. Tour Hosp Manag 15: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.15.1.1 doi: 10.20867/thm.15.1.1
    [21] Parahoo SK, Harvey HL, Radi GYA (2014) Satisfaction of tourists with public transport: An empirical investigation in Dubai. J Travel Tour Mark 31: 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.890158 doi: 10.1080/10548408.2014.890158
    [22] Rebstock M (2017) Economic benefits of improved accessibility to transport systems and the role of transport in fostering tourism for all. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 2017-04.
    [23] Le-Klaehn DT, Hall CM (2015) Tourist use of public transport at destinations–a review. Curr Issues Tour 18: 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.948812 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2014.948812
    [24] Virkar AR, Mallya PD (2018) A review of dimensions of tourism transport affecting tourist satisfaction. Indian J Commer Manage Stud 9: 72–80. http://doi.org/10.18843/ijcms/v9i1/10 doi: 10.18843/ijcms/v9i1/10
    [25] Fernández Abenoza R (2017) Improving travel satisfaction with public transport. PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
    [26] Ramos S, Vicente P, Passos AM, et al. (2019) Perceptions of the public transport service as a barrier to the adoption of public transport: A qualitative study. Soc Sci 8: 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050150 doi: 10.3390/socsci8050150
    [27] Loi LTI, So ASI, Lo IS, et al. (2017) Does the quality of tourist shuttles influence revisit intention through destination image and satisfaction? The case of Macao. J Hosp Tour Manag 32: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.06.002
    [28] Le-Kläehn DT, Roosen J, Gerike R, et al. (2015) Factors affecting tourists' public transport use and areas visited at destinations. Tourism Geogr 17: 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1084527 doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1084527
    [29] Herle FA (2018) The impact of destination image on tourists' satisfaction and loyalty in the context of domestic tourism. Mark–Inf Decis J 1: 14–26. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/midj-2018-0007 doi: 10.2478/midj-2018-0007
    [30] Pérez Campdesuñer R, García Vidal G, Sánchez Rodríguez A, et al. (2017) Structural equation model: Influence on tourist satisfaction with destination attributes. Tour Hosp Manag 23: 219–233. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.23.2.2 doi: 10.20867/thm.23.2.2
    [31] Pallant J (2013) In: SPSS survival manual, 6th Eds., London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK). http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Dmitry I. Sinelshchikov, Linearizabiliy and Lax representations for cubic autonomous and non-autonomous nonlinear oscillators, 2023, 01672789, 133721, 10.1016/j.physd.2023.133721
    2. Jaume Giné, Xavier Santallusia, Integrability via algebraic changes of variables, 2024, 184, 09600779, 115026, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115026
    3. Meryem Belattar, Rachid Cheurfa, Ahmed Bendjeddou, Paulo Santana, A class of nonlinear oscillators with non-autonomous first integrals and algebraic limit cycles, 2023, 14173875, 1, 10.14232/ejqtde.2023.1.50
    4. Jaume Giné, Dmitry Sinelshchikov, Integrability of Oscillators and Transcendental Invariant Curves, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01182-x
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4209) PDF downloads(243) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog