This study examines two decades of labor and capital costs and gross output to evaluate production in 19 industries. A lesson learned is the need to have more input cost variables specifically defined to capture the production environment. Simply evaluating production by two categories alone—labor and capital—is not sufficient. This study tests a new production equation, producing an ordinary least squares regression model to explain changes to labor and capital resources in the U.S. economy. I found that increasingly growing capital intensity might not be optimal. Labor continues to play a role in production. Applied in proper proportion—neither too much nor too little—labor can be effective in producing maximum output. This study contributes to the literature by quantifying capital intensity with a measure that generalizes about U.S. production across industries. Evidence shows that 12 out of 19 industries had low capital intensity; in other words, most industries were labor intensive with relatively small utilization of equipment.
Citation: Edward Y. Uechi. Determining a proportion of labor and equipment to achieve optimal production: A model supported by evidence of 19 U.S. industries from 2000 to 2020[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(2): 266-290. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024012
This study examines two decades of labor and capital costs and gross output to evaluate production in 19 industries. A lesson learned is the need to have more input cost variables specifically defined to capture the production environment. Simply evaluating production by two categories alone—labor and capital—is not sufficient. This study tests a new production equation, producing an ordinary least squares regression model to explain changes to labor and capital resources in the U.S. economy. I found that increasingly growing capital intensity might not be optimal. Labor continues to play a role in production. Applied in proper proportion—neither too much nor too little—labor can be effective in producing maximum output. This study contributes to the literature by quantifying capital intensity with a measure that generalizes about U.S. production across industries. Evidence shows that 12 out of 19 industries had low capital intensity; in other words, most industries were labor intensive with relatively small utilization of equipment.
| [1] |
Acemoglu D, Autor D, Dorn D, et al. (2014) Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in U.S. manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 104: 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.394 doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.394
|
| [2] |
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. J Econ Perspect 33: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3 doi: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3
|
| [3] |
Ackerberg D, Caves K, Frazer G (2015) Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica 83: 2411–2451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13408 doi: 10.3982/ECTA13408
|
| [4] |
Baron J, Bielby W (1982) Workers and machines: Dimensions and determinants of technical relations in the workplace. Am Sociol Rev 47: 175–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094961 doi: 10.2307/2094961
|
| [5] |
Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Q J Econ 122: 1721–1758. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721 doi: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721
|
| [6] | Baumol W (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57: 415–426. |
| [7] | Bessen J (2012) More machines, better machines... or better workers? J Econ Hist 72: 44–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050711002439 |
| [8] |
Brooks H (1983) Technology, competition, and employment. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 470: 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716283470001 doi: 10.1177/0002716283470001
|
| [9] |
Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Krizan C (2006) Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. retail trade sector in the 1990s. Rev Econ Stat 88: 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.748 doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.748
|
| [10] | Levhari D, Sheshinski E (1970) A microeconomic production function. Econometrica 38: 559–573. |
| [11] |
Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70: 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246 doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
|
| [12] | Nordhaus W (2006) Baumol's diseases: A macroeconomic perspective (Working Paper 12218), Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. |
| [13] |
Pariboni R, Tridico P (2020) Structural change, institutions and the dynamics of labor productivity in Europe. J Evol Econ 30: 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00641-y doi: 10.1007/s00191-019-00641-y
|
| [14] |
Rust R, Huang M (2012) Optimizing service productivity. J Mark 76: 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0441 doi: 10.1509/jm.10.0441
|
| [15] |
Schmitz J (2005) What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J Polit Econ 113: 582–625. https://doi.org/10.1086/429279 doi: 10.1086/429279
|
| [16] | Solow R (1987) We'd better watch out. N Y Times Book Rev 36. http://digamo.free.fr/solow87.pdf. |
| [17] | Uechi E (2023) Business automation and its effect on the labor force: A practical guide for preparing organizations for the fourth industrial revolution, New York: Routledge/Productivity Press, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189329 |
| [18] | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2021) Concepts and methods of the U.S. national income and product accounts (NIPA Handbook), Suitland, MD: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. |
| [19] | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2022) Gross output by industry: 2000 to 2020[Data set], Suitland, MD: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available from: https://apps.bea.gov/industry/Release/XLS/GDPxInd/GrossOutput.xlsx. |
| [20] | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021) Quarterly census of employment and wages, QCEW NAICS-based data files, CSVs by industry, annual averages: 2000 to 2020[Data set], Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/cew/downloadable-data-files.htm. |
| [21] | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022) Capital details for major sectors and industries: 2000 to 2020[Data set], Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/productivity/tables/. |
| [22] |
Van Biesebroeck J (2007) Robustness of productivity estimates. J Indust Econ 55: 529–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00322.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00322.x
|
| [23] |
Whelan K (2002) Computers, obsolescence, and productivity. Rev Econ Stat 84: 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302320259466 doi: 10.1162/003465302320259466
|
 NAR-06-02-012-S001.pdf |
 |
Figures(2) / Tables(5)
Edward Y. Uechi. Determining a proportion of labor and equipment to achieve optimal production: A model supported by evidence of 19 U.S. industries from 2000 to 2020[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(2): 266-290. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024012
DownLoad: