In this study, we explore the impact of ownership structure on a firm's earnings quality in emerging markets. Using the Chinese manufacturing industry sample set, we demonstrate that higher profitability performance could increase earnings quality. Higher concentrated shareholding and institutional shareholding reduce information asymmetry and improve external monitoring, improving earnings quality. Well-studied independent board members do not improve but contribute negatively to earnings quality. Such a result may be due to the lack of variation in the number of independent board members in each list of firms. Almost all firms choose to have three independent board members. Finally, bond debt increases asset size and agency costs; the impact of bond debt on earnings quality is negative. When considering the interaction between bond covenants and external monitoring, including independent board members and institutional shareholdings, the interactive effects reduce the negative effect of the bond debt on earnings quality. This study contributes to discovering that both direct and indirect monitoring of ownership structure contributes to the firm's management and provides some useful insight to reduce agency costs.
Citation: Dachen Sheng, Opale Guyot. Corporate governance in Chinese manufacturing sector: Ownership structure, monitoring and firms' earning quality[J]. National Accounting Review, 2023, 5(4): 421-443. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2023024
In this study, we explore the impact of ownership structure on a firm's earnings quality in emerging markets. Using the Chinese manufacturing industry sample set, we demonstrate that higher profitability performance could increase earnings quality. Higher concentrated shareholding and institutional shareholding reduce information asymmetry and improve external monitoring, improving earnings quality. Well-studied independent board members do not improve but contribute negatively to earnings quality. Such a result may be due to the lack of variation in the number of independent board members in each list of firms. Almost all firms choose to have three independent board members. Finally, bond debt increases asset size and agency costs; the impact of bond debt on earnings quality is negative. When considering the interaction between bond covenants and external monitoring, including independent board members and institutional shareholdings, the interactive effects reduce the negative effect of the bond debt on earnings quality. This study contributes to discovering that both direct and indirect monitoring of ownership structure contributes to the firm's management and provides some useful insight to reduce agency costs.
[1] | Abbassi W, Boubaker S, Louhichi W (2022) Why do corporate social responsibility-oriented companies opt for bond debt? Evidence from crisis periods. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2741 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2741 |
[2] | Ang JS, Cole RA, Lin JW (2000) Agency costs and ownership structure. J Finance 55: 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00201 doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00201 |
[3] | Akhigbe A, McNulty JE, Stevenson BA (2017) Does the form of ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from US bank profit efficiency before and during the financial crisis. Q Rev Econ Finance 64: 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.015 doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.015 |
[4] | Aksoy M, Yilmaz MK, Topcu N, et al. (2021) The impact of ownership structure, board attributes and XBRL mandate on timeliness of financial reporting: evidence from Turkey. J Appl Account Res 22: 706–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2020-0127 doi: 10.1108/JAAR-07-2020-0127 |
[5] | Almand A, Cantrell B, Dickinson V (2023) Accruals and firm life cycle: Improving regulatory earnings management detection. Adv Account 60: 100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2023.100642 doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2023.100642 |
[6] | Armstrong CS, Core JE, Guay WR (2014) Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency?. J Financ Econ 113: 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.009 |
[7] | Arslan Ö, Karan MB (2006) Ownership and control structure as determinants of corporate debt maturity: a panel study of an emerging market. Corp Gov: An Int Rev 14: 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00509.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00509.x |
[8] | Ball R, Gerakos J, Linnainmaa JT, et al. (2016) Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the cross section of stock returns. J Financ Econ 121: 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.002 |
[9] | Bathala CT, Rao RP (1995) The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. MDE Manage Decis Econ 16: 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160108 doi: 10.1002/mde.4090160108 |
[10] | Berlin M, Loeys J (1988) Bond covenants and delegated monitoring. J Finance 43: 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03946.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03946.x |
[11] | Bhagat S, Bolton B (2008) Corporate governance and firm performance. J Corp Finance 14: 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006 |
[12] | Cavaco S, Crifo P, Rebérioux A, et al. (2017) Independent directors: Less informed but better selected than affiliated board members?. J Corp Finance 43: 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.004 |
[13] | Chang K, Kang E, Li Y (2016) Effect of institutional ownership on dividends: An agency-theory-based analysis. J Bus Res 69: 2551–2559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.088 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.088 |
[14] | Chen C, Kim JB, Yao L (2017) Earnings smoothing: does it exacerbate or constrain stock price crash risk?. J Corp Finance 42: 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.004 |
[15] | Chen SS, Chen YS, Kang JK, et al. (2020) Board structure, director expertise, and advisory role of outside directors. J Financ Econ 138: 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.05.008 |
[16] | Choi H, Kim JH, Suh J, et al. (2023) Ownership concentration and financial policy of China's listed firms. China Econ Rev 79: 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101973 doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101973 |
[17] | Conyon MJ, He L (2011) Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. J Corp Finance 17: 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.006 |
[18] | Dechow PM, Dichev ID (2002) The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. Account Rev 77: 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 |
[19] | Deng L, Li S, Liao M (2017) Dividends and earnings quality: Evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Finance 48: 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2016.12.011 |
[20] | Demsetz H, Villalonga B (2001) Ownership structure and corporate performance. J Corp Finance 7: 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7 doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7 |
[21] | Docgne S (2022) Bond covenants and investment policy. J Financial Res 45: 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12283 doi: 10.1111/jfir.12283 |
[22] | Dopuch N, Mashruwala R, Seethamraju C, et al. (2012) The impact of a heterogeneous accrual-generating process on empirical accrual models. J Account Audit Finance 27: 386–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11409157 doi: 10.1177/0148558X11409157 |
[23] | Du Q, Wang Y, Wei KJ (2020) Does cash-based operating profitability explain the accruals anomaly in China?. Pacific-Basin Finance J 61: 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101336 doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101336 |
[24] | Elyasiani E, Jia JJ, Mao CX (2010) Institutional ownership stability and the cost of debt. J Financial Mark 13: 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2010.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.05.001 |
[25] | Fairfield PM, Whisenant S, Yohn TL (2003) The differential persistence of accruals and cash flows for future operating income versus future profitability. Rev Account Stud 8: 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024413412176 doi: 10.1023/A:1024413412176 |
[26] | Fong K, Hong H, Kacperczyk M, et al. (2022) Do security analysts discipline credit rating agencies?. Rev Corp Financ Stud 11: 815–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfac021 doi: 10.1093/rcfs/cfac021 |
[27] | Gao W, Huang Z, Yang P (2019) Political connections, corporate governance and M & A performance: Evidence from Chinese family firms. Res Int Bus Finance 50: 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.04.007 |
[28] | Gao J, O'Sullivan N, Sherman M (2021) Chinese securities investment funds: The role of luck in performance. Rev Account Financ 20: 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-07-2020-0182 doi: 10.1108/RAF-07-2020-0182 |
[29] | Harris M, Raviv A (1990) Capital structure and the informational role of debt. J Finance 45: 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03693.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03693.x |
[30] | Hong B, Li Z, Minor D (2016) Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 136: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2962-0 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2962-0 |
[31] | Huang Q (2020) Ownership concentration and bank profitability in China. Econ Lett 196: 109525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109525 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109525 |
[32] | James HL, Ngo T, Wang H (2021) Independent director tenure and corporate transparency. North Am J Econ Finance 57: 101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101413 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2021.101413 |
[33] | Janang JT, Suhaimi R, Salamudin N (2015) Can ownership concentration and structure be linked to productive efficiency?: Evidence from government linked companies in Malaysia. Procedia Econ Financ 31: 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01136-3 doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01136-3 |
[34] | Jiang F, Kim KA (2020) Corporate governance in China: A survey. Rev Financ 24: 733–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa012 doi: 10.1093/rof/rfaa012 |
[35] | Jiang H, Habib A, Hu B (2011) Ownership concentration, voluntary disclosures and information asymmetry in New Zealand. Br Account Rev 43: 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.10.005 |
[36] | Khan R, Dharwadkar R, Brandes P (2005) Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: a longitudinal examination. J Bus Res 58: 1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.002 |
[37] | Lu D, Liu G, Liu Y (2022) Who are better monitors? Comparing styles of supervisory and independent directors. Int Rev Financial Anal 83: 102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102305 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102305 |
[38] | McConnell JJ, Servaes H (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J Financ Econ 27: 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C |
[39] | Moradi M, Salehi M, Zamanirad M (2015) Analysis of incentive effects of managers' bonuses on real activities manipulation relevant to future operating performance. Manag Decis 53: 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2014-0172 doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2014-0172 |
[40] | Park C (2000) Monitoring and structure of debt contracts. J Finance 55: 2157–2195. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00283 doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00283 |
[41] | Purkayastha S, Veliyath R, George R (2022) Type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ agency conflicts in family firms: An empirical investigation. J Bus Res 153: 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.054 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.054 |
[42] | Qi L, Wang L, Li WA (2020) Do mutual fund networks affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27: 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1864 doi: 10.1002/csr.1864 |
[43] | Reisel N (2014) On the value of restrictive covenants: Empirical investigation of public bond issues. J Corp Finance 27: 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.05.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.05.011 |
[44] | Sahasranamam S, Arya B, Sud M (2020) Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Asia Pacific J Manag 37: 1165–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09649-1 doi: 10.1007/s10490-019-09649-1 |
[45] | Saona P, Muro L, Alvarado M (2020) How do the ownership structure and board of directors' features impact earnings management? The Spanish case. J Int Financ Manag Account 31: 98–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12114 doi: 10.1111/jifm.12114 |
[46] | Short H, Zhang H, Keasey K (2002) The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. J Corp Finance 8: 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00030-X doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00030-X |
[47] | Shui X, Zhang M, Smart P, et al. (2022) Sustainable corporate governance for environmental innovation: A configurational analysis on board capital, CEO power and ownership structure. J Bus Res 149: 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.037 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.037 |
[48] | Song Y, Ji X, Lee CWJ (2013) Ownership balance, supervisory efficiency of independent directors and the quality of management earnings forecasts. China J Account Res 6: 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2013.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2013.01.001 |
[49] | Wang MC, Lee MH, Chuang JJ (2016) Relations among audit committee establishment, information transparency and earnings quality: evidence from simultaneous equation models. Qual Quant 50: 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0269-y doi: 10.1007/s11135-015-0269-y |
[50] | Wang H, Wang W, Alhaleh SEA (2021) Mixed ownership and financial investment: Evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Econ Anal Policy 70: 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.006 |
[51] | Wongchoti U, Tian G, Hao W, et al. (2021) Earnings quality and crash risk in China: an integrated analysis. J Asia Bus Stud 28: 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-02-2020-0012 doi: 10.1108/JABES-02-2020-0012 |
[52] | Zaid MA, Abuhijleh ST, Pucheta-Martínez MC (2020) Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27: 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1888 doi: 10.1002/csr.1888 |
[53] | Ze-To SY (2012) Earnings management and accrual anomaly across market states and business cycles. Adv Account 28: 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2012.09.011 doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2012.09.011 |