Research article

Impact of Islamic and conventional corporate governance mechanisms on ethical performance of Islamic banks: evidence from Malaysia

  • Received: 18 March 2020 Accepted: 14 May 2020 Published: 19 May 2020
  • JEL Codes: G34

  • This paper aims to study empirically the impact of Islamic and conventional corporate governance mechanisms on ethical performance through econometric panel data constructed from 17 Malaysian Islamic banks observed over 7 years from 2005 to 2011. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between the ethical performance of Malaysian Islamic banks, measured by the Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR); the Zakat Performance Ratio (ZPR) and the Islamic Income versus Non-Islamic Income Ratio (IIVNIR), and the Islamic governance variables.

    Citation: Jamel Eddine Mkadmi. Impact of Islamic and conventional corporate governance mechanisms on ethical performance of Islamic banks: evidence from Malaysia[J]. National Accounting Review, 2020, 2(2): 174-187. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020010

    Related Papers:

  • This paper aims to study empirically the impact of Islamic and conventional corporate governance mechanisms on ethical performance through econometric panel data constructed from 17 Malaysian Islamic banks observed over 7 years from 2005 to 2011. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between the ethical performance of Malaysian Islamic banks, measured by the Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR); the Zakat Performance Ratio (ZPR) and the Islamic Income versus Non-Islamic Income Ratio (IIVNIR), and the Islamic governance variables.


    加载中


    [1] Abidin ZZ, Kamal NM, Jusoff K (2009) Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. Int J Econ Financ 1: 150-164.
    [2] Adams R, Mehran H (2003) Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies? Econ Policy Rev 4: 123-142.
    [3] Adams R, Mehran H (2005) Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the banking industry. Working paper, 1-42.
    [4] Adams R, Mehran H (2008) Corporate performance, board structure and their determinants in the banking Industry. Federal Reserve Bank New York Staff Report No. 330.
    [5] Adnan MA, Rashid HM, Meera AKM, et al. (2011) A Panel DataAnalysis on the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Bank Efficiency. The Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference, 21-22 February 2011, Hotel Istana-Jalan Raja Chulan, Kuala Lumpur. Available from: http://ebookbrowse.com/606-adnan-pdf-d71737492.
    [6] Agoraki MEK, Delis MD, Staikouras PK (2008) The Effect of Board Size and Composition on Bank Efficiency, (December 26, 2008). Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1320671.
    [7] Agrawal A, Knoeber C (1996) Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. J Financ Quant Anal 31: 377-397. doi: 10.2307/2331397
    [8] Aydin N (2017) Islamic vs conventional human development index: Empirical evidence from ten Muslim countries. Int J Social Econ 44: 1562-1583. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-03-2016-0091
    [9] Ekekwe N (2019) Three reasons why Diamond bank failed-Moody's. Available from: https://www.tekedia.com/three-reasons-why-diamond-bank-failed-moodys/.
    [10] Fama E, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26: 301-325. doi: 10.1086/467037
    [11] Fernandez C, Arrondo R (2005) Alternative internal controls as substitute of the board of directors. Corp Governance Int Rev 13: 856-866. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00476.x
    [12] Finance Committee on Corporate Governance (2001) Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance, Securities Commission.
    [13] Ghayad R (2008) Corporate governance and the global performance of Islamic banks. Humanomics 24: 207-216. doi: 10.1108/08288660810899368
    [14] Ghosh S, Nachane DM, Narain A, et al. (2003) Capital requirements and bank behaviour: An empirical analysis of indian public sector banks. J Int Dev 15: 145-156. doi: 10.1002/jid.947
    [15] Godard L, Schatt A (2000) Faut-il séparer les fonctions de décision et de contrôle? Papier de recherche présenté aux journaux internationaux de l'AFFI, ESC Paris, Juin.
    [16] Godard L (2001) La taille du conseil d'administration: déterminants et impact sur la performance. Cahier du FARGO No. 1010702.
    [17] Graham JR, Harvey CR (2001) The theory and practices of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financ Econ 60: 187-243. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00044-7
    [18] Griffith JM, Fogelberg L (2000) Control and bank performance. J Financ Strat Decis 13: 63-69.
    [19] Guru BJ, Staunton J, Balashanmugam B (2002) Determinants of commercial banks profitability in Malaysia. University Multimedia working papers.
    [20] Hausman JA (1978) Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251-1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827
    [21] Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1991) The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm Performance. Financ Manage 20: 101-112. doi: 10.2307/3665716
    [22] Hess K, Francis G (2004) Cost income ratio benchmarking in banking. An Int J 3: 303-319.
    [23] Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of Panel data, Econometric Society Monographs, 2è edition.
    [24] Hurlin C (2006) L'Econométrie des Données de Panel: Modèles Linéaires Simples, Séminaire Méthodologique. Ecole Doctorale Edocif.
    [25] Jafaru J, Iyoha FO (2012) Stewardship and corporate governance in the banking sector: Evidence from Nigeria. Accounting Financ Res 1.
    [26] Jensen MC (1993) The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. J Financ 48: 831-880. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
    [27] Kaymak T, Bektas E (2008) East meets west? Board characteristics in an emerging market: Evidence from Turkish Banks. Corp Governance 16: 550-561.
    [28] Kiel GC, Nicholson GJ (2003) Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corp Governance Int Rev 11: 189-205. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00318
    [29] Kwan S (2003) Risk and Return of Publicly Held versus Privately Owned Banks, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Econ Policy Rev.
    [30] Levine R (2004) The Corporate governance of banks: A concise discussion of concepts and evidence. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3404.
    [31] Lipton M, Lorsch J (1992) A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Bus Lawyer 48: 59-77.
    [32] Louizi G (2007) Role of the board in banks' governance and impact on performance; Case of Tunisian banks. Euro-Mediterr Econ Financ Rev 1.
    [33] Macey JR, O'Har M (2003) The corporate governance of banks. Econ Policy Rev 9: 91-108.
    [34] Mathuva DM (2009) Capital adequacy, cost income ratio and the performance of commercial banks: The Kenyan scenario. Int J Appl Econ Financ 3: 35-47. doi: 10.3923/ijaef.2009.35.47
    [35] Mkadmi JE, Khamoussi H (2016) Impact of Islamic corporate governance mechanisms on financial performance of Islamic banks: Evidence from Malaysia, Book chapter, Ethical and social perspectives on Global Business Interaction In emerging Markets, Chap11, 18.
    [36] Montandrau S (2006) Activisme des investisseurs institutionnels et performance boursière: les caractéristiques du conseil d'administration qui permettent la confiance. CEROG-IAE d'Aix en Provence Université d'Aix- Marseille III.
    [37] Moin MS (2013) Financial performance of Islamic banking and conventional banking in Pakistan: A comparative study. Int J Innovative Appl Financ 3: 2-5.
    [38] Mughal KM, Waheed A, Shah BM (2015) Comparison of Islamic and conventional banks performance. Int J Res Econ Social Sci 5: 37-46.
    [39] Pathan S, Skully M, Wickramanayake J (2007) Board size, independence and performance: an analysis of Thai banks. Asia-Pacific Financ Mark 14: 211-227. doi: 10.1007/s10690-007-9060-y
    [40] Pi L, Timme SG (1993) Corporate control and bank efficiency. J Bank Financ 17: 515-530. doi: 10.1016/0378-4266(93)90050-N
    [41] Samad A (2005) Performance of Interest-free Islamic banks vis-à-vis Interest-based Conventional Banks of Bahrain. IIUM J Econ Manage 12: 1-15.
    [42] Shivdasani A, Yermack D (1999) CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: an empirical analysis. J Financ 54: 1829-1853. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00168
    [43] Siagh L, Diallo OA, Hafsi T (2004) Environnement intense et choix stratégique: le cas des banques islamiques. Cahier de recherche N, 20-46, ISSN 1711-6309 HEC Montréal.
    [44] Sierra G, Talmor E, Wallace J (2006) An examination of multiple governance forces within banking holding companies. J Financ Ser Res 29: 105-123. doi: 10.1007/s10693-006-5921-1
    [45] Simpson WG, Gleason AE (1999) Board structure, ownership and financial distress in banking firms. Int Rev Econ Financ 8: 281-292. doi: 10.1016/S1059-0560(99)00026-X
    [46] Simpson WG, Kohers T (2002) The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. J Bus Ethics 35: 97-109. doi: 10.1023/A:1013082525900
    [47] Simpson WG, Gleason AE (1999) Board structure, ownership and financial distress in banking firms. Int Rev Econ Financ 8: 281-292. doi: 10.1016/S1059-0560(99)00026-X
    [48] Skully MT (20020 Banking and corporate governance: some prudential issues. Presented in Second International Conference on Banking and Finance in Greece, August 9-11, 2002.
    [49] Spong K, DeYoung R, Sullivan RJ (2001) Who's minding the store? Motivating and monitoring hired managers at small, closely held commercial banks. J Bank Financ 25: 1209-1243.
    [50] Sridharan U, Marsinko A (1997) CEO duality in the paper and forest products industry. J Financ Strate Decis 10.
    [51] Staikouras PK, Staikouras CK, Agoraki MEK (2007) The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance. Eur J Law Econ 23: 1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10657-007-9001-2
    [52] St-Onge S, Magnan M, Calloc'H Y (2001) Conseil d'administration et rémunération des dirigeants d'entreprise au Canada: une perspective politique. Revue canadienne des sciences de l'administration 18: 57-76.
    [53] Vafeas N (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance. J Financ Econ 53: 113-142. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
    [54] Worrel DL, Nemec C, Davidson WN (1997) One hat too many: key executive plurality and shareholder wealth. Strate Manage J 18: 499-507. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199706)18:6<499::AID-SMJ898>3.0.CO;2-F
    [55] Yan Y (1998) The FDICIA and bank CEO's pay-performance relationship: An empirical investigation. Working Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, No. 9805, Janvier.
    [56] Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J Financ Econ 40: 185-211. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
    [57] Zulkafli AH, Samad FA (2007) Corporate governance and performance of banking firms: evidence from Asian emerging markets. Adv Financ Econ 12: 49-74. doi: 10.1016/S1569-3732(07)12003-X
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3584) PDF downloads(332) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog