Can shocks to the discount factor explain business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria (1999–2018)?

Aleksandar Vasilev; Aleksandar Vasilev

doi:10.3934/NAR.2020016

National Accounting Review

2020, Volume 2, Issue 3: 285-296. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020016

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Can shocks to the discount factor explain business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria (1999–2018)?

Aleksandar Vasilev ^,

Department of Accountancy, Finance and Economics, Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

Received: 24 July 2020 Accepted: 21 August 2020 Published: 25 August 2020
JEL Codes: E24, E32

A stochastic discount factor is introduced into a real-business-cycle setup with a government sector. The model is calibrated to Bulgarian data for the period 1999–2018, which is after the introduction of the currency board arrangement. The quantitative importance of shocks to the discount factor is investigated for the propagation of cyclical fluctuations in Bulgaria. In particular, allowing for a stochastic discount factor in the setup improves the model fit vis-a-vis data by increasing variability of employment and wages. However, those improvements are at the cost of increasing the volatility of consumption and investment.
- business cycles,
- stochastic discount factor,
- Bulgaria
Citation: Aleksandar Vasilev. Can shocks to the discount factor explain business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria (1999–2018)?[J]. National Accounting Review, 2020, 2(3): 285-296. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020016

Related Papers:

Abstract

A stochastic discount factor is introduced into a real-business-cycle setup with a government sector. The model is calibrated to Bulgarian data for the period 1999–2018, which is after the introduction of the currency board arrangement. The quantitative importance of shocks to the discount factor is investigated for the propagation of cyclical fluctuations in Bulgaria. In particular, allowing for a stochastic discount factor in the setup improves the model fit vis-a-vis data by increasing variability of employment and wages. However, those improvements are at the cost of increasing the volatility of consumption and investment.

References

[1]	Bulgarian National Bank (2020) Bulgarian National Bank Statistics. Available from: http://www.bnb.bg.
[2]	Canova F (2007) Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
[3]	Cogley T, Nason J (1995) Output dynamics in Real-Business-Cycles. Am Econ Rev 85: 492-511.
[4]	Di Nola A, Kocharkov G, Vasilev A (2019) Envelope wages, Hidden Production, and Labor Productivity. BE J Macroecon 19: 1-30.
[5]	Hodrick R, Prescott E (1980) Post-war US business cycles: An empirical investigation, Mimeo, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
[6]	National Statistical Institute (2020) Aggregate Statistical Indicators. Available from: http://www.nsi.bg.
[7]	Parkin M (1988) A method for determining whether parameters in aggregative models are structural, In: Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy, North-Holland, 29: 215-252.
[8]	Rotemberg J, Woodford M (1996) Real-Business-Cycle Models and the Forecastable Movements in Output, Hours, and Consumption. Am Econ Rev 86: 71-89.
[9]	Vasilev A (2020) A Real-business-cycle Model with a Stochastic Capital Share: Lessons for Bulgaria(1999-2018). J Appl Econ Res 14: 107-121.
[10]	Vasilev A (2019a) How important are consumer confidence shocks for the propagation of business cycles in Bulgaria? LEAF Working Papers, Lincoln, UK: University of Lincoln.
[11]	Vasilev A (2019b) The role of endogenous capital depreciation rate for business cycle dynamics: lessons from Bulgaria (1999-2018), Mimeo, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
[12]	Vasilev A (2017a) Business Cycle Accounting: Bulgaria after the introduction of the currency board arrangement (1999-2014). Eur J Comp Econ 14: 197-219.
[13]	Vasilev A (2017b) A Real-Business-Cycle model with efficiency wages and a government sector: the case of Bulgaria. Cent Eur J Econ Econometrics 9: 359-377.
[14]	Vasilev A (2017c) A Real-Business-Cycle model with reciprocity in labor relations and fiscal policy:the case of Bulgaria. Bulg Econ Pap 3: 1-26.
[15]	Vasilev A (2017d) VAT Evasion in Bulgaria: A General-Equilibrium Approach. Rev Econ Inst 8: 2-17.
[16]	Vasilev A (2017e) Progressive taxation and (in) stability in an exogenous growth model with an informal sector. J Econ Econometrics 60: 1-13.
[17]	Vasilev A (2016a) Progressive taxation and (in) stability in an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation. J Econ Econometrics 59: 1-15.
[18]	Vasilev A (2016b) Search and matching frictions and business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria. Bulg Econ Pap 3: 2-41.
[19]	Vasilev A (2015a) Welfare effects of flat income tax reform: the case of Bulgaria. East Eur Econ 53:205-220.
[20]	Vasilev A (2015b) Welfare gains from the adoption of proportional taxation in a general-equilibrium model with a grey economy: the case of Bulgaria's 2008 flat tax reform. Econ Change Restructuring 48: 169-185.
[21]	Vasilev A (2009) Business cycles in Bulgaria and the Baltic countries: an RBC approach. Int J Comput Econ Econometrics 1: 148-170. doi: 10.1504/IJCEE.2009.029256

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)