Economic, ecological and social benefits through redistributing revenues from increased mineral oil taxation in Austria: A triple dividend

Sebastian Goers; Friedrich Schneider; Sebastian Goers; Friedrich Schneider

doi:10.3934/GF.2019.4.442

Green Finance

2019, Volume 1, Issue 4: 442-456. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.4.442

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Economic, ecological and social benefits through redistributing revenues from increased mineral oil taxation in Austria: A triple dividend

Sebastian Goers ^{1
,
,},
Friedrich Schneider ^1,2

1.
Department of Energy Economics, Energieinstitut at the Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
2.
Research Institute for Banking and Finance, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria

Received: 28 November 2019 Accepted: 18 December 2019 Published: 20 December 2019
JEL Codes: Q43, Q52, E62

To meet the future energy and climate targets in 2030 and 2050 in Austria, it is absolutely necessary to apply extensive measures to reduce the use of fossil fuels. By then, Austria will have to realize a 36% decrease (from 2005 levels) for emission sources outside the European Emission Trading System. The transport sector is a key driver of recently increasing greenhouse gas emissions in Austria. Hence, we examine the macroeconomic and ecologic impacts of an environmental tax reform in Austria from 2020 to 2030. We implement a revenue-neutral tax reform that raises revenues via an increase of the mineral oil tax on diesel and petrol consumption and redistributes these fiscal revenues to the industry and households. In addition, increased fossil fuel taxing would enhance revenues for green investments in e-mobility and thermal refurbishment that stimulate the Austrian economy. The simulation analyses focus on central macroeconomic variables as gross domestic product, employment, investment and private consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. We find that the proposed environmental tax reform generates a triple dividend, leading simultaneously to economic growth and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions while low-income households can be fully compensated.
- environmental tax reform,
- mineral oil tax,
- transport sector,
- green investment,
- macroeconomic simulation
Citation: Sebastian Goers, Friedrich Schneider. Economic, ecological and social benefits through redistributing revenues from increased mineral oil taxation in Austria: A triple dividend[J]. Green Finance, 2019, 1(4): 442-456. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.4.442

Related Papers:

Abstract

To meet the future energy and climate targets in 2030 and 2050 in Austria, it is absolutely necessary to apply extensive measures to reduce the use of fossil fuels. By then, Austria will have to realize a 36% decrease (from 2005 levels) for emission sources outside the European Emission Trading System. The transport sector is a key driver of recently increasing greenhouse gas emissions in Austria. Hence, we examine the macroeconomic and ecologic impacts of an environmental tax reform in Austria from 2020 to 2030. We implement a revenue-neutral tax reform that raises revenues via an increase of the mineral oil tax on diesel and petrol consumption and redistributes these fiscal revenues to the industry and households. In addition, increased fossil fuel taxing would enhance revenues for green investments in e-mobility and thermal refurbishment that stimulate the Austrian economy. The simulation analyses focus on central macroeconomic variables as gross domestic product, employment, investment and private consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. We find that the proposed environmental tax reform generates a triple dividend, leading simultaneously to economic growth and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions while low-income households can be fully compensated.

References

[1]	Austrian Automobile, Motorcycle and Touring Club (2018) Mineralölsteuer. Available from: https://www.oeamtc.at/thema/verkehr/mineraloelsteuer-17914742
[2]	Austrian Federal Environmental Agency (2019) Austria's Annual Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2017. Report REP-0672. Vienna: Umweltbundesamt.
[3]	Baumol W (1972) On taxation and the Control of Externalities. Amer Econ Rev 62: 307-321.
[4]	Baumol W, Oates W (1971) The Use of Standards and Pricing for the Protection of the Environment. Swedish J Econ 73: 42-54. doi: 10.2307/3439132
[5]	Bointner R, Biermayr P, Goers S, et al. (2013) Wirtschaftskraft Erneuerbarer Energie in Österreich und Erneuerbare Energie in Zahlen. Blue Globe Report #1/2013. Vienna: Austrian Climate and Energy Fund.
[6]	Breuss F, Steininger K (1995) Reducing the Greenhouse Effect in Austria. A General Equilibrium Evaluation of CO₂-Policy-Options. EI Working Papers, Vienna.
[7]	Brons M, Nijkamp P, Pels E, et al. (2008) A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energ Econ 30: 2105-2122. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.004
[8]	Druckman A, Jackson T (2009) The carbon footprint of UK households 1990-2004: a socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecol Econ 68: 2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.013
[9]	European Environment Agency (2018) Transport greenhouse gas emissions. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/airs/2018/resource-efficiency-and-low-carbon-economy/transport-ghg-emissions
[10]	Federal Ministry of Austria for Sustainability and Tourism and Federal Ministry of Austria for Transport, Innovation and Technology (2018) #mission2030. Austrian Climate and Energy Strategy. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Austria for Sustainability and Tourism and Federal Ministry of Austria for Transport, Innovation and Technology.
[11]	Goers S, Baresch M, Tichler R, et al. (2015) MOVE2-Simulation model of the (Upper) Austrian economy with a special focus on energy including the socio-economic module MOVE2social-integration of income, age and gender. Linz: Energieinstitut at the Johannes Kepler University.
[12]	Goers S, Schneider F (2019) Austria's Path to a Climate-Friendly Society and Economy-Contributions of an Environmental Tax Reform. Modern Economy 10: 1369-1384. doi: 10.4236/me.2019.105092
[13]	Goulder L (1995) Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide. Int Tax Public Finan 2: 157-183. doi: 10.1007/BF00877495
[14]	Goulder L, Parry I, Burtraw D (1997) Revenue-Raising versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Preexisting Tax Distortions. Rand J Econ 28: 708-731. doi: 10.2307/2555783
[15]	Hymel KM, Small KA, Van Dender K (2010) Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport. Transport Res B 44: 1220-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.007
[16]	Kirchner M, Sommer M, Kratena K, et al. (2019) CO₂ Taxes, Equity and the Double Dividend: Macroeconomic Model Simulations for Austria. Energ Policy 126: 295-314. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.030
[17]	Köppl A, Kettner C, Kletzan-Slamanig D, et al. (2014) Energy Transition in Austria: Designing Mitigation Wedges. Energy Environ 25: 281-304.
[18]	Moser S, Mayrhofer J, Schmidt R, et al. (2018) Socioeconomic cost-benefit-analysis of seasonal heat storages in district heating systems with industrial waste heat integration. Energy 160: 868-874. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.057
[19]	Ottelin J, Heinonen J, Junnila S (2018) Carbon and material footprints of a welfare state: Why and how governments should enhance green investments. Environ Sci Policy 86: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.011
[20]	Pearce D (1991) The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. Econ J 101: 938-948. doi: 10.2307/2233865
[21]	Shammin M, Bullard C (2009) Impact of cap-and-trade policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions on US households. Ecol Econ 68: 2432-2438. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.024
[22]	Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, et al. (2014) Transport, In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
[23]	Statistik Austria (2019a) Ökosteuern. Available from: http://statistik.gv.at/web_de/statistiken/energie_umwelt_innovation_mobilitaet/energie_und_umwelt/umwelt/oeko-steuern/index.html
[24]	Statistik Austria (2019b) Kraftfahrzeuge-Neuzulassungen. Available from: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/energie_umwelt_innovation_mobilitaet/verkehr/strasse/kraftfahrzeuge_-_neuzulassungen/index.html
[25]	Steinmüller H, Tichler R, Kienberger T, et al. (2017) Smart Exergy Leoben: Exergetische Optimierung der Energieflüsse für eine smarte Industriestadt Leoben. Vienna: Austrian Climate and Energy Fund.
[26]	Tichler R (2009) Optimale Energiepreise und Auswirkungen von Energiepreisveränderungen auf die oberösterreichische Volkswirtschaft. Analyse unter Verwendung des neu entwickelten Simulationsmodells MOVE. Linz: Energiewissenschaftliche Studien.
[27]	Titelbach G, Leitner G, van Linthoudt J-M (2018) Verteilungswirkungen potentieller Verkehrsmaßnahmen in Österreich. Research Report. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
[28]	Yeo S (2019) Where climate cash is flowing and why it's not enough. Nature 573: 328-331. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02712-3

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)