Commentary Special Issues

The Bilingual Cognitive Advantage: No Smoke without Fire?

  • In a commentary on a review article by Paap and colleagues [1], and a response to that review by Saidi and Ansaldo [2], I examine the key arguments for and against the existence of a ‘bilingual advantage’ in cognitive functions, including the effects of small samples, and of confounding variables in studies on both sides of the debate. While accepting that the behavioural evidence here is inconclusive, I argue that the evidence for wide-ranging, plastic change in the bilingual brain would seem to predict that bilingualism may have similarly wide-ranging effects on behaviour. Finally, I note that bilingual cognitive advantages - if any exist - are inherently longitudinal phenomena, in the sense that they are thought to emerge as a function of the transfer of practice effects from linguistic to non-linguistic cognitive control skills. In that context, the most direct way to characterise those advantages, and the mechanisms that make them possible, may be with longitudinal studies, which also naturally control for many of the factors that may confound the cross-sectional studies which have dominated the field so far.

    Citation: Thomas M. H. Hope. The Bilingual Cognitive Advantage: No Smoke without Fire?[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(2): 58-65. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.2.58

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ana Klobučar Barišić, Antoaneta Klobučar . Double total domination number in certain chemical graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19629-19640. doi: 10.3934/math.20221076
    [2] Bo Zhu, Shumin Zhang, Huifen Ge, Chengfu Ye . The $ g $-extra $ H $-structure connectivity and $ g $-extra $ H $-substructure connectivity of hypercubes. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24848-24861. doi: 10.3934/math.20231267
    [3] Huifen Ge, Shumin Zhang, Chengfu Ye, Rongxia Hao . The generalized 4-connectivity of folded Petersen cube networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14718-14737. doi: 10.3934/math.2022809
    [4] Abel Cabrera-Martínez, Andrea Conchado Peiró . On the $ \{2\} $-domination number of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10731-10743. doi: 10.3934/math.2022599
    [5] Ahlam Almulhim . Signed double Italian domination. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30895-30909. doi: 10.3934/math.20231580
    [6] Betül ATAY ATAKUL . Stability and domination exponentially in some graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5063-5075. doi: 10.3934/math.2020325
    [7] Shahid Zaman, Fouad A. Abolaban, Ali Ahmad, Muhammad Ahsan Asim . Maximum $ H $-index of bipartite network with some given parameters. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5165-5175. doi: 10.3934/math.2021306
    [8] Abel Cabrera-Martínez, Andrea Conchado Peiró, Juan Manuel Rueda-Vázquez . Further results on the total Italian domination number of trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10654-10664. doi: 10.3934/math.2023540
    [9] Zepeng Li . A note on the bounds of Roman domination numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3940-3946. doi: 10.3934/math.2021234
    [10] A. El-Mesady, Y. S. Hamed, M. S. Mohamed, H. Shabana . Partially balanced network designs and graph codes generation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2393-2412. doi: 10.3934/math.2022135
  • In a commentary on a review article by Paap and colleagues [1], and a response to that review by Saidi and Ansaldo [2], I examine the key arguments for and against the existence of a ‘bilingual advantage’ in cognitive functions, including the effects of small samples, and of confounding variables in studies on both sides of the debate. While accepting that the behavioural evidence here is inconclusive, I argue that the evidence for wide-ranging, plastic change in the bilingual brain would seem to predict that bilingualism may have similarly wide-ranging effects on behaviour. Finally, I note that bilingual cognitive advantages - if any exist - are inherently longitudinal phenomena, in the sense that they are thought to emerge as a function of the transfer of practice effects from linguistic to non-linguistic cognitive control skills. In that context, the most direct way to characterise those advantages, and the mechanisms that make them possible, may be with longitudinal studies, which also naturally control for many of the factors that may confound the cross-sectional studies which have dominated the field so far.


    Even though the roots of fractional calculus are in the late 17th century [1], the subject has received significant attention from researchers only in recent decades. The importance of fractional calculus and fractional differential equations (FDEs) is evidenced by the emergence of fractional-order models for real-world phenomena, which has lead to a plethora of applications of FDEs [2]. A short review of the areas in which FDEs are applied is given below.

    The advantage of fractional-order models is that they can be used to model systems with the memory effect, under which the current state of the system at time $ t = t_0 $ is affected by an interval of states at time $ t < t_0 $. Thus, such models lend themselves naturally to the description of viscoelastic materials [3,4]. It can be noted that most biological tissues possess viscoelastic properties [5] which has lead to the use of FDEs to describe the evolution of various biomedical systems [6,7,8]. In physics, fractional-order models are widely used to study dielectric materials [9,10,11] and Bose-Einstein condensates [12]. FDEs have also been used to describe the memory effect in economic models [13,14].

    Due to the applicability of fractional-order models, a wide variety of methods have been developed to construct solutions to FDEs. The Q-homotopy analysis transform is applied in order to obtain analytical solutions to the fractional coupled Ramani equation in [15]. The solutions of integer-order differential equations are used to construct the solutions to the models of cooling and spread of epidemic diseases [16]. An Adams-type predictor-corrector method for the construction of numerical solutions to FDEs is discussed in [17]. A new family of predictor-corrector methods for FDEs is discussed in [18]. A Legendre operational matrix approach is used to numerically solve FDEs in [19,20].

    The homotopy analysis method is adapted to FDEs for the computation of approximate solutions to various equations, including fractional Korteweg-de-Vries, Burgers and Boussinesq models in [21]. A class of rational Krylov methods for the construction of numerical solutions to partial fractional differential equations is considered in [22]. The traditional reproducing kernel method is adapted to be applicable to FDEs in [23]. A restricted transform technique is used to solve irrational order FDEs in [24]. Artificial neural networks are used to construct approximate solutions to FDEs in [25].

    The main objective of this paper is to present a novel framework for the extension of the solutions to fractional differential equation (FDEs) to negative argument values. The main idea of this procedure is to construct the ordinary differential equation (ODE) that has a solution which can be transformed to the solution of the considered FDE. Since the solution of the ODE also exists for negative argument values, it can be used to extend the solution of the FDE for such argument values as well. This results in complex-valued solutions to FDEs for negative argument values. Such extension is a novel viewpoint into the solutions to FDEs, as they can be analyzed not only in the set $ x \in \mathbb{R}_+ $, but in the entire real line $ x \in \mathbb{R} $. This goes beyond the current state-of-the-art, as with current algorithms the solutions to FDEs cannot be considered in the negative $ x $-axis.

    In this paper we consider functions defined via power series:

    $ f(x)=+j=0vjw(n)j,
    $
    (2.1)

    where $ v_j \in \mathbb{R} $ are coefficients of the series and the base functions $ w^{(n)}_j; n \in \mathbb{N}, j = 0, 1, \dots $ are defined as:

    $ w(n)j(x)=xjnΓ(jn+1);nN,j=0,1,.
    $
    (2.2)

    The usual notation $ \Gamma(x) $ is used to denote the gamma function [26].

    The number $ n $ which denotes the order of the basis of fractional power series is selected with respect to the fractional derivative order which is analyzed. If the fractional derivative is of order $ \alpha = \frac{k}{m} $, and $ \gcd(k, m) = 1 $, it is taken that $ n = m $ [27].

    Consider $ x > 0 $ and let $ \sqrt[n]{x} \in \mathbb{R} $. Using the substitution $ t : = \sqrt[n]{x} $, (2.1) can be rewritten as:

    $ f(x)=ˆf(t)=+j=0γj(nx)j=+j=0γjtj,γj=vjΓ(jn+1).
    $
    (2.3)

    For subsequent computations it is required that $ \widehat{f}(t) $ be analytic (except for some finite number of singularity points) and non-singular at $ t = 0 $. Thus, there exists a convergence radius $ |t| < T_0; \, T_0 > 0 $. The function $ \widehat{f} $ will be referred to as the characteristic function of $ f $.

    For any given $ n \in \mathbb{N} $, the set of all functions defined by (2.1) and meeting the requirements stated above is denoted as $ {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $. Conventional addition and multiplication operations on functions belonging to $ {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $ are defined. For example, given two series $ f = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} v_j w^{(n)}_j $ and $ g = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} b_j w^{(n)}_j $, the product is defined as:

    $ fg=+j=0(jk=0(jk)vkbjk)w(n)j.
    $
    (2.4)

    Note that the sum above obeys the finite summation principle: all coefficients of the above series are given by finite sums, not series [28].

    The set $ {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $ with addition and multiplication operations forms an algebra over $ \mathbb{C} $. The properties of algebra $ {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $ are discussed in detail in [27] and [29].

    Let $ f = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} v_j w^{(n)}_j \in {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $. Caputo differentiation operator of order $ \frac{1}{n} $ is then defined as [30]:

    $ CD(1/n)f=+j=0vj+1w(n)j.
    $
    (2.5)

    Note the Caputo derivatives of basis functions [27]:

    $ CD(1/n)w(n)j={0,j=0w(n)j1,j=1,2,
    $
    (2.6)

    Derivatives of rational order $ \frac{k}{n}; k \in \mathbb{N} $ are defined by higher powers of operator $ \, {}^{C} \mathit{\boldsymbol{\mathrm{{D}}}}^{(1/n)} $ [29]:

    $ (CD(1/n))kf=+j=0vj+kw(n)j=+j=0Γ(j+kn+1)γj+kΓ(jn+1)(nx)j.
    $
    (2.7)

    In the special case of $ k = m\cdot n; m\in \mathbb{N} $, (2.7) reads:

    $ (CD(1/n))mnf=+j=0Γ(jn+m+1)Γ(jn+1)γj+mn(nx)j=+j=0(mk=1(jn+k))γj+mn(nx)j.
    $
    (2.8)

    It is well-known that analytic functions can be extended beyond their convergence radius [31]. The same idea is adapted for series of the type (2.1). Let $ f = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} \gamma_j \left(\sqrt[n]{x}\right)^j $ and choose $ \sqrt[n]{x_0} $ such that $ x_0 $ is nonzero and in the characteristic function's convergence radius, $ 0 < x_0 < T_0^n $. Then (2.1) can be rearranged:

    $ f=+j=0γj((nxnx0)+nx0)j=+j=0jk=0(jk)γj(nx0)jk(nxnx0)k=+k=0(+j=k(jk)γj(nx0)jk)(nxnx0)k=+j=0ˆγj(nxnx0)j.
    $
    (2.9)

    Coefficients $ \widehat{\gamma}_j $ are defined as:

    $ ˆγj=+k=j(kj)γk(nx0)kj.
    $
    (2.10)

    Note that coefficients (2.10) are finite, because the non-extended series $ f $ converges in its convergence radius $ 0 < x_0 < T_0^n $. The convergence radius for (2.9) is $ |\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[n]{x_0}| < T_1, \, T_1 > 0 $. Furthermore, if the same procedure is repeated for $ x_1 \neq x_0 $ that also satisfies $ 0 < x_1 < T_0^n $, then:

    $ +j=0ˆγj(nxnx0)j=+j=0˜γj(nxnx1)j,
    $
    (2.11)

    as long as $ x $ is such that series on both sides of the equation converge.

    This procedure can be applied to extend a function from the set $ {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $ between two singularity points (or singularity and infinity, if no other singularities are present) by rewriting the function in different basis $ \left(\sqrt[n]{x} - \sqrt[n]{x_k}\right)^j, k = 0, 1, \dots $. Note that these extended series coincide for $ x $ that lies in all of their convergence radii, thus the extensions are unique.

    Note that computational operations, such as the Caputo differentiation operator are only defined for basis $ \left(\sqrt[n]{x}\right)^j $ (in the neighbourhood of $ x = 0 $). For this reason, all computations are first performed in this neighbourhood and then extended throughout the entire function domain. Thus, the zero neighbourhood of $ x $ is called the algebraic operation neighbourhood. The concept of this neighbourhood is introduced in [28].

    In the subsequent sections of this paper, constructing series solutions to ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is necessary. The generalized differential operator technique is used for this task. A short description of this method is given in this section. A detailed overview can be found in [32,33].

    Let us consider an ordinary differential equation in the explicit form:

    $ dz dt=P(t,z);z(c)=s;c,sR,
    $
    (2.12)

    where $ P $ is an arbitrary bivariate analytic function. The following generalized differential operator is associated with the ODE (2.12) [34]:

    $ Dcs=Dc+P(c,s)Ds,
    $
    (2.13)

    where $ \mathit{\boldsymbol{\mathrm{{D}}}}_{\lambda} $ denotes the partial differentiation operator with respect to variable $ \lambda $.

    The series solution to (2.12) can then be written in the form [32]:

    $ z(t,c,s)=+j=0(tc)jj!pj(c,s),
    $
    (2.14)

    where $ p_j(c, s) = \mathit{\boldsymbol{\mathrm{{D}}}}_{cs}^j s $.

    The following fractional differential equation is considered in this section:

    $ (CD(1/n))nyn=Qm(yn);yn=yn(x),
    $
    (3.1)

    where $ y_n \in {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $ and $ Q_m $ is an arbitrary $ m $th order polynomial:

    $ Qm(y)=mk=0akyk;mN,am0.
    $
    (3.2)

    In the remainder of this section, solutions in the operation neighbourhood of $ x = 0 $ will be constructed directly and later extended into different neighbourhoods using the procedure described in previous sections.

    Consider a series $ y_n = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} v_j w^{(n)}_j = \sum_{j = 0}^{+\infty} \gamma_j \left(\sqrt[n]{x}\right)^j \in {}^C \mathbb{F}_n $. Inserting the function into (3.1) yields:

    $ +j=0(jn+1)γj+n(nx)j=mk=1(ak(+j=0(k1++km=jkl=1γkl)(nx)j))+a0.
    $
    (3.3)

    Let $ \sqrt[n]{x} = t $ and $ \widehat{y}_n = \sum_{j = 1}^{+\infty} \gamma_j t^j $. Then, (3.3) yields:

    $ +j=0(j+n)γj+ntj=nQm(ˆyn).
    $
    (3.4)

    Rearranging the sums in (3.4) yields:

    $ +j=njγjtj1=ntn1Qm(ˆyn).
    $
    (3.5)

    It can be noted that adding $ \sum_{j = 1}^{n-1} j \gamma_j t^{j-1} $ to both sides of (3.5) transforms the right side to an ordinary derivative of $ \widehat{y}_n $:

    $ dˆyndt=ntn1Qm+n1j=1jγjtj1.
    $
    (3.6)

    Noting that $ \gamma_j = \frac{v_j}{\Gamma\left(\frac{j}{n}+1\right)} $ yields a different form of (3.6):

    $ dˆyndt=n(tn1Qm(ˆyn)+n1j=1vjΓ(jn+1)tj1).
    $
    (3.7)

    Adding the initial condition $ y_n(c) = s $, Equation (3.7) can be solved using the method described in 2.4. The generalized differential operator for (3.7) reads:

    $ Dcs=Dc+n(cn1Qm(s)+n1j=1vjΓ(jn+1)cj1)Ds.
    $
    (3.8)

    The solution to (3.7) (taking values of $ t $ for which the series converges) has the form:

    $ ˆyn=ˆyn(t,c,s)=+j=0(tc)jj!pj(c,s),
    $
    (3.9)

    where $ p_j(c, s) = \mathit{\boldsymbol{\mathrm{{D}}}}_{cs}^j s $. Noting that $ y_n(x) = \widehat{y}_n\left(\sqrt[n]{x}\right) $ yields Theorem 3.1.

    Theorem 3.1. The fractional differential equation (3.1) admits the following general solution for any parameter values $ u_0; v_1, v_2, \dots, v_{n-1}; \; x_0 \ge 0 $:

    $ yn(x)=+j=0(nxnx0)jj!pj(nx0,u0),
    $
    (3.10)

    where

    $ yn(nx0)=u0,
    $
    (3.11)

    and

    $ (CD(1/n))kyn|x=0=vk;k=1,,n1,
    $
    (3.12)

    if $ x $ satisfies $ \left|\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[n]{x_0}\right| < T_{x_0} $. Here $ T_{x_0} > 0 $ denotes the convergence radius of (3.10).

    Note that the results of this section can be extended to analytic functions. Taking $ Q(x) = \sum_{k = 0}^{+\infty} a_k x^k $ instead of $ Q_m(x) $ and following the steps outlined above would yield a theorem that is analogous to Theorem 3.1. However, the analysis of such equations is not the focus of this paper, thus we will consider only polynomial $ Q_m(x) $ in the remainder of the text.

    Based on Theorem 3.1, the Cauchy initial value problem for (3.1) can be formulated at point $ x = 0 $:

    $ (CD(1/n))nyn=Qm(yn),yn=yn(x,u(0)0);
    $
    (3.13)
    $ (CD(1/n))kyn|x=0=vk;k=1,,n1;
    $
    (3.14)
    $ yn|x=0=u(0)0.
    $
    (3.15)

    Note that since $ \sqrt[n]{x} $ in general possesses $ n $ branches, in these computations we select the branch with a minimum value of $ \arg{x} $.

    By the results obtained in the previous section, in the neighbourhood of $ x = 0 $, the problem (3.13)–(3.15) has the solution:

    $ yn=+j=0(nx)jj!pj(0,u(0)0).
    $
    (3.16)

    This solution can be extended by applying the algorithm discussed in section 2.3. First, choose a sequence $ x_0 = 0 < x_1 < x_2 < \dots $ and freely choose $ u_0^{(0)} \in \mathbb{R} $. Then, compute parameters $ u_0^{(1)}, u_0^{(2)}, \dots $ as:

    $ u(k+1)0=ˆyn(nxk+1,nxk,u(k)0),k=0,1,
    $
    (3.17)

    The general solution to (3.13)–(3.15) can then be written for any $ k $:

    $ yn=yn(x,u(0)0)=ˆyn(nx,nxk,u(k)0),
    $
    (3.18)

    for $ \left|\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[n]{x_k}\right| < T_{x_k} $, $ T_{x_k} > 0, x_k \ge 0 $.

    The rearrangements described in the previous section can be applied to construct a more general Cauchy initial value problem, where the first initial condition can be formulated at nonzero $ x $:

    $ (CD(1/n))nyn=Qm(yn),yn=yn(x,u(0)0);
    $
    (3.19)
    $ (CD(1/n))kyn|x=0=vk;k=1,,n1;
    $
    (3.20)
    $ yn|x=x0=u(0)0;x00..
    $
    (3.21)

    Analogously to problem (3.13)–(3.15), the solution reads:

    $ yn=yn(x,x0,u(0)0)=ˆyn(nx,nx0,u(0)0).
    $
    (3.22)

    Note that initial conditions that correspond to fractional derivative values still must be formulated at $ x = 0 $ for solution (3.22) to hold true.

    As stated earlier, the main objective of this paper is to extend the solutions to FDEs so that they would exist for negative values of argument $ x $. This extension results in complex-valued fractional power series, which are defined in the following subsection. Note that this extension is not possible when considering fractional derivatives in the traditional Caputo sense, as they are defined via integrals only for non-negative values of $ x $.

    Let us consider an extension to the power series basis presented in section 2.1:

    $ (w(n)j)k:=(n|x|)jΓ(jn+1)exp(ijargx+2πkn),
    $
    (4.1)

    where $ x\in \mathbb{R} $, $ k = 0, \dots, n-1; j = 0, 1, \dots $ and $ \sqrt[n]{|x|} \in \mathbb{R} $ denotes the root with the lowest value of $ \arg{x} $. The basis with $ k = 0 $ corresponds to $ w^{(n)}_j $ presented in section 2.1, while $ k = 1, 2, \dots, n-1 $ result in complex-valued functions $ \left(w^{(n)}_j\right)_k $.

    Using (4.1), the standard fractional power series (2.1) can be extended into $ n $ complex-valued series:

    $ fk(x)=+j=0vj(w(n)j)k;k=0,,n1.
    $
    (4.2)

    By Theorem 3.1, the solution to

    $ (CD(1/n))nyn=Qm(yn);yn=yn(x),
    $
    (4.3)

    reads:

    $ yn(x)=+j=0(nxnx0)jj!pj(nx0,u0),
    $
    (4.4)

    where coefficients $ p_j $ are generated via the generalized differential operator technique as described in previous sections. Using the basis defined in the previous section, the solution (4.4) can extended into the complex plane:

    $ (yn(x))k=+j=0(n|x|n|x0|)jj!exp(ijargx0+2πkn)pj(n|x0|exp(iargx0+2πkn),u0).
    $
    (4.5)

    Denoting $ \alpha : = \arg{x_0} $ and $ \beta_n^{(k)}(\alpha) : = \exp\left(i \frac{\alpha+2\pi k}{n}\right) $, series (4.5) can be rewritten as:

    $ (yn(x))k=+j=0(n|x|n|x0|)jj!(λ(k)j(|x0|,α,u0)+iμ(k)j(|x0|,α,u0)),
    $
    (4.6)

    where

    $ λ(k)j(|x0|,α,u0):=Re((β(k)n(α))jpj(n|x0|β(k)n(α),u0));
    $
    (4.7)
    $ μ(k)j(|x0|,α,u0):=Im((β(k)n(α))jpj(n|x0|β(k)n(α),u0)).
    $
    (4.8)

    Expression (4.6) allows the consideration of solutions for $ x < 0 $, however, these solutions are multi-valued (a total of $ n $ branches corresponding to the number of distinct roots $ \sqrt[n]{x} $) and take complex values.

    A refinement of the procedure described in section 3.2 is needed to construct particular solutions to FDEs (4.3). Two sequences of numbers are chosen: $ \dots < x_{-r} < \dots < x_{-1} < 0 $; $ 0 < x_1 < x_2 < \dots $ and $ x_0 = 0 $. For any $ k = 0, \dots, n-1 $, the initial condition $ s_0^{(k)} \in \mathbb{R} $ can be taken freely.

    Sequences $ s^{(k)}_{-r} $ and $ s^{(k)}_{r} $ are computed using relations:

    $ s(k)r+1:=ˆy((nxr+1)k,(nxr)k,s(k)r);r=0,1,;
    $
    (4.9)
    $ s(k)r1:=ˆy((nxr1)k,(nxr)k,s(k)r);r=0,1,.
    $
    (4.10)

    Here $ \widehat{y} $ denotes the solution of the ODE that the FDE (4.3) is transformed to, as given by Theorem 3.1.

    Then the particular solution to (4.3) corresponding to the $ k $th branch of the root $ \sqrt[n]{x} $ reads:

    $ (yn(x))k=ˆy((nx)k;(nxr)k;s(k)r),
    $
    (4.11)

    where $ r = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \dots $.

    Note that the sequence $ \dots < x_{-1} < x_0 < x_1 < \dots $ must be chosen in such a way that the series generated by $ \widehat{y} $ are convergent in both $ \mathbb{R} $ and $ \mathbb{C} $. Also, the point $ x = 0 $ is a branching point for the solution to the FDE, thus the functions $ \left(y_n(x)\right)_k $ are non-differentiable at this point.

    Let us consider the non-fractional Riccati equation:

    $ dy dx=2y25y3;
    $
    (5.1)
    $ y(x0)=u0.
    $
    (5.2)

    It is well-known that (5.1) admits the kink solitary solution:

    $ y(x,x0,u0)=α2(u0α1)exp(2α1(xx0))α1(u0α2)exp(2α2(xx0))(u0α1)exp(2α1(xx0))(u0α2)exp(2α2(xx0)),
    $
    (5.3)

    where $ \alpha_{1} = 3, \alpha_{2} = -\frac{1}{2} $ are the roots of polynomial $ 2y^2 - 5y - 3 $. Solution (5.3) is depicted in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Kink solitary solution to (5.1) for initial conditions $ x_0 = 0, u_0 = 2/5 $.

    Suppose that $ n = 2 $, $ x_0 = 0 $ and let us consider the fractional Riccati equation:

    $ (CD(1/2))2y=2y25y3.
    $
    (5.4)

    As stated earlier, the initial conditions read:

    $ CD(1/2)y|x=0=v1;y(0)=u(0)0.
    $
    (5.5)

    The solution to (5.4), (5.5) is constructed using the algorithm described in section 4.3. Note that since $ \sqrt{x} $ possesses two branches, two solutions exist. The real and imaginary parts of these solutions are shown in Figure 2. Note that solution is purely real for $ x \ge 0 $ – the imaginary parts appears only for negative values of $ x $.

    Figure 2.  Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the solution to the fractional Riccati equation (5.4) for initial conditions $ x_0 = 0, u_0^{(0)} = 2/5, v_1 = 5 $. The green solid line and blue dashed line denote solutions corresponding to different branches of $ \sqrt{x} $.

    It can be seen in Figure 3 that as $ v_1 $ approaches zero, the solutions to (5.4) approach the kink solitary solution (5.3).

    Figure 3.  Solutions to the fractional Riccati equation (5.4). Initial conditions are set to $ x_0 = 0, u_0^{(0)} = 2/5 $ for both (a) and (b). The initial condition corresponding to the coefficients of the fractional series powers is set to $ v_1 = 5, v_1 = 1 $ in (a) and (b) respectively. The green solid line and blue dashed line denote solutions corresponding to different branches of $ \sqrt{x} $. The black line corresponds to the non-fractional solitary solution (5.3).

    Taking $ n = 3 $ results in the fractional Riccati equation:

    $ (CD(1/3))3y=2y25y3.
    $
    (5.6)

    The number of initial conditions for (5.6) increases to three:

    $\left.{ }^{C} \bf{D}^{(1 / 3)} y\right|_{x = 0} = v_{1} ;\left.\quad\left({ }^{C} \bf{D}^{(1 / 3)}\right)^{2} y\right|_{x = 0} = v_{2} ; \quad y(0) = u_{0}^{(0)}. $ (5.7)

    Riccati equation (5.6) has three solutions: two of them are complex-valued and one is a real-valued solution. The real and imaginary parts of these solutions are depicted in Figure 4. A spatial plot for two different sets of initial conditions is shown in Figure 5.

    Figure 4.  Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of the solution to the fractional Riccati equation (5.6) for initial conditions $ x_0 = 0, u_0^{(0)} = 2/5, v_1 = -1, v_2 = \frac{1}{10} $. The green and red solid lines and blue dashed line denote solutions corresponding to different branches of $ \sqrt[3]{x} $. Note that the solution corresponding to the red solid line is real-valued.
    Figure 5.  Solutions to the fractional Riccati equation (5.6). Initial conditions are set to $ x_0 = 0, u_0^{(0)} = 2/5 $ for both (a) and (b). The initial condition corresponding to the coefficients of the fractional series powers is set to $ v_1 = -1, v_2 = \frac{1}{10} $ in (a) and $ v_1 = -\frac{1}{2}, v_2 = \frac{1}{2} $ in (b). The green and red solid lines and blue dashed line denote solutions corresponding to different branches of $ \sqrt[3]{x} $. The black line corresponds to the non-fractional solitary solution (5.3). Note that the solution corresponding to the red solid line is real-valued, but does not coincide with the the non-fractional solitary solution.

    Note that the as $ x\to \pm \infty $, the fractional solitary solutions approach the non-fractional kink solitary solution. This is due to the properties of the characteristic equation (3.6). Thus, the limits of the fractional and non-fractional coincide as $ x \to \pm \infty $.

    An analytical framework for the extension of solutions to FDEs into the negative half-line is presented in this paper. The main idea of this extension is the construction of a characteristic differential equation for a given FDE. The solution to the characteristic equation is used to construct a fractional power series solution to the FDE. This solution is then extended using classical Riemann extension techniques to enable the consideration of the solution at a neighbourhood different than the origin $ x = 0 $. Furthermore, this extension is valid for both positive and negative values of $ x $, which extends the solution to the entire real line.

    As demonstrated by computational experiments, the solution to the FDE is complex-valued for negative values of $ x $. Furthermore, there exist $ n $ branches of solutions, where $ n $ is the denominator of the fractional differentiation order. If the initial conditions (3.20) that correspond to fractional derivatives tend to zero, the solution to the FDE tends to the non-fractional solution of the same equation.

    The presented technique provides a solid foundation for the construction of solutions to FDEs on the negative half-line. In particular, this allows to travel backwards in time from the initial conditions of a FDE – such a possibility has not been reported previously. It is well-known that fractional order derivatives help to model memory effects in dynamical systems. Therefore it would be tempting to extend the available coronavirus pandemic models [35,36] by introducing fractional derivatives. However, the results of this paper show that such an extension would eliminate the possibility of the unique backwards extrapolation. These questions as well as the physical interpretation of the extensions to the negative half-line remain a definite objective of future research.

    This research was funded by a grant (No. S-COV-20-8) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Paap KR, Sawi OM, Dalibar C, et al. (2014) The Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Cognitive Benefits of Bilingualism may be Extraordinarily Difficult to Discover. AIMS neurosci 1: 245-256. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.3.245
    [2] Saidi LG, Ansaldo AI (2015) Can a Second Language Help You in More Ways Than One? AIMS neurosci 1: 52-57.
    [3] Duyck W, Diependaele K, Drieghe D, et al. (2004) The Size of the Cross-Lingua Masked Phonological Priming Effect Does Not Depend on Second Language Proficiency. Exp Psychol 51: 116-124. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.116
    [4] Lalor E, Kirsner K (2000) Cross-lingual transfer effects between English and Italian cognates and noncognates. Int J Biling 4: 385-398. doi: 10.1177/13670069000040030501
    [5] Lemhöfer K, Dijkstra T, Michel M (2004) Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Lang Cogn Process 19: 585-611. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000007
    [6] Kroll JF (2008) Juggling two languages in one mind. Psychological Science Agenda, American Psychological Association 22.
    [7] Paap KR, Johnson HA, Sawi O (2014) Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? J CognPsychol 26: 615-639.
    [8] Green DW (2008) Bilingual Aphasia: Adapted Language Networks and their Control. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 28: 25-48. doi: 10.1017/S0267190508080057
    [9] Green DW, Abutalebi J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. J Cogn Psychol 25: 515-530. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.796377
    [10] Bialystok E, Majumder S, Martin MM (2003) Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? Appl Psycholinguistics 24: 27-44.
    [11] Bialystok E, Martin MM (2004) Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental science 7: 325-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.x
    [12] Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Freedman M (2007) Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia 45: 459-464. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.009
    [13] Fernandes MA, Craik F, Bialystok E, et al. (2007) Effects of bilingualism, aging, and semantic relatedness on memory under divided attention. Can J Exp Psychol 61: 128-141. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007014
    [14] Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G (2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 859-873. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859
    [15] Sterne JA, Davey Smith G (2001) Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? Bmj 322: 226-231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226
    [16] Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, et al. (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14: 365-376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475
    [17] Hilchey MD, Klein RM (2011) Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychon Bull Rev 18: 625-658.
    [18] Anton E, Dunabeitia JA, Estevez A, et al. (2014) Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Front Psychol 5: 398.
    [19] Dunabeitia JA, Hernandez JA, Anton E, et al. (2014) The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited: myth or reality? Exp Psychol 61: 234-251. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000243
    [20] Paap KR, Greenberg ZI (2013) There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cogn Psychol 66: 232-258. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
    [21] Paap KR, Sawi O (2014) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs. Front Psychol 5: 962.
    [22] Morton JB, Harper SN (2007) What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Dev Sci 10: 719-726.
    [23] Kirk NW, Fiala L, Scott-Brown KC, et al. (2014) No evidence for reduced Simon cost in elderly bilinguals and bidialectals. J Cogn Psychol (Hove) 26: 640-648. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.929580
    [24] Calvo A, Bialystok E (2014) Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition 130: 278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.015
    [25] Ljungberg JK, Hansson P, Andrés P, et al. (2013) A Longitudinal Study of Memory Advantages in Bilinguals. PLoS ONE 8: e73029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073029
    [26] Sheng L, Lu Y, Gollan TH (2014) Assessing language dominance in Mandarin-English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures. Biling (Camb Engl) 17: 364-383. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000424
    [27] Ratcliff R, McKoon G (2008) The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks. Neural comput 20: 873-922. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
    [28] Luk G, Anderson JAE, Craik FIM, et al. (2011) Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain Cogn 74: 347-357.
    [29] Hunt LT, Kolling N, Soltani A, et al. (2012) Mechanisms underlying cortical activity during value-guided choice. Nat Neurosci 15: 470-476. doi: 10.1038/nn.3017
    [30] Abutalebi J, Della Rosa PA, Green DW, et al. (2012) Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cereb Cortex 22: 2076-2086. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr287
    [31] Shenhav A, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (2013) The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 79: 217-240. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
    [32] di Pellegrino G, Ciaramelli E, Ladavas E (2007) The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 275-286. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.275
    [33] Glascher J, Adolphs R, Damasio H, et al. (2012) Lesion mapping of cognitive control and value-based decision making in the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 14681-14686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206608109
    [34] Fellows LK, Farah MJ (2005) Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain 128: 788-796. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh405
    [35] Abutalebi J, Della Rosa PA, Green DW, et al. (2012) Bilingualism Tunes the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Conflict Monitoring. Cereb Cortex 22: 2076-2086. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr287
    [36] Mechelli A, Crinion JT, Noppeney U, et al. (2004) Neurolinguistics: Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature 431: 757-757. doi: 10.1038/431757a
    [37] Mårtensson J, Eriksson J, Bodammer NC, et al. (2012) Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning. NeuroImage 63: 240-244. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.043
    [38] Kovelman I, Baker SA, Petitto L-A (2008) Bilingual and Monolingual Brains Compared: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Syntactic Processing and a Possible “Neural Signature” of Bilingualism. J cogn neurosci20: 153-169. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20011
    [39] Olsen RK, Pangelinan MM, Bogulski C, et al. (2015) The effect of lifelong bilingualism on regional grey and white matter volume. Brain Res.
    [40] Moreno S, Bialystok E, Wodniecka Z, et al. (2010) Conflict Resolution in Sentence Processing by Bilinguals. J Neurolinguistics 23: 564-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.05.002
    [41] Calabria M, Hernandez M, Branzi FM, et al. (2012) Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: evidence from task switching. Front Psychol 2: 399.
    [42] Sagi D (2011) Perceptual learning in Vision Research. Vision Research 51: 1552-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.019
    [43] Webster J, Whitworth A, Morris J (2015) Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology: 1-25.
    [44] Welch DB, Seitz AR (2013) Processing Irrelevant Location Information: Practice and Transfer Effects in a Simon Task. PLoS ONE 8: e64993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064993
    [45] Macnamara BN, Conway AR (2014) Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychon Bull Rev 21: 520-525. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0524-y
    [46] Prior A, Gollan TH (2013) The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. J Cogn Psychol (Hove) 25: 622-645. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.821993
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Inga Timofejeva, Zenonas Navickas, Tadas Telksnys, Romas Marcinkevicius, Minvydas Ragulskis, An Operator-Based Scheme for the Numerical Integration of FDEs, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1372, 10.3390/math9121372
    2. R. Marcinkevicius, I. Telksniene, T. Telksnys, Z. Navickas, M. Ragulskis, The construction of solutions to $ {}^{C} \mathit{\boldsymbol{{D}}}^{(1/n)} $ type FDEs via reduction to $ \left({}^{C} \mathit{\boldsymbol{{D}}}^{(1/n)}\right)^n $ type FDEs, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 16536, 10.3934/math.2022905
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6002) PDF downloads(1330) Cited by(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog