Citation: Louis Papageorgiou, Dimitrios Vlachakis. Antisoma Application: A Fully Integrated V-Like Antibodies Platform[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2017, 4(4): 382-394. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2017.4.382
[1] | Alessandro P. Delitala . Autoimmunity in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(2): 132-139. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.2.132 |
[2] | Vivek Radhakrishnan, Mark S. Swanson, Uttam K. Sinha . Monoclonal Antibodies as Treatment Modalities in Head and Neck Cancers. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(4): 347-359. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.4.347 |
[3] | Sharon Lu . Clinical pharmacology to support monoclonal antibody drug development. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 322-341. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022014 |
[4] | Rena Rahimova . Relationship between CTLA4, TNF-α and PTPN22 gene polymorphism and the serum levels of antithyroglobulin and antiperoxidase antibodies in autoimmune thyroiditis. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(1): 14-23. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023002 |
[5] | Nasrin Moghimi, Naseh Sigari, Sayed Mohammad Hosinian, Afshin Saeedi, Daem Roshani, Mohammad Ali Zeinolabedin Moshref, Shirin Nourbakhsh, Asrin Babahajian . Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients exposed to wood smoke. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020001 |
[6] | Annamaria Petrungaro, Eugenia Quartarone, Luciana Rigoli, Paolo Sciarrone . Prothrombotic role of antiphospholipid antibodies in a patient with sickle cell disease. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(3): 362-366. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022017 |
[7] | Heliya Bandehagh, Farnaz Gozalpour, Ali Mousavi, Mahdi Hemmati Ghavshough . Effects of melatonin on the management of multiple sclerosis: A scoping review on animal studies. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(2): 137-156. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024012 |
[8] | Payal A. Shah, John Goldberg . Novel Approaches to Pediatric Cancer: Immunotherapy. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(2): 104-117. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.2.104 |
[9] | Kwon Yong, Martin Brechbiel . Application of 212Pb for Targeted α-particle Therapy (TAT): Pre-clinical and Mechanistic Understanding through to Clinical Translation. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(3): 228-245. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.3.228 |
[10] | Michiro Muraki . Sensitization to cell death induced by soluble Fas ligand and agonistic antibodies with exogenous agents: A review. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(3): 122-203. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020011 |
In 1890 Emil von Behring and Kitasato described an activity in serum of toxin-immunized animals that neutralized toxin. Transfer of immune serum could protect naive animals from diphtheria or tetanus. Bordet found in 1899 that animals could make antibodies against erythrocytes of other species and that these could direct destruction of the cells along with serum "complement" [1]. In 1900 Paul Ehrlich hypothesized that there are side chain receptors on cells that bind to a given pathogen. He speculated that this interaction induces the cell exhibiting the receptor to multiply and produce more copies of the same receptor [2]. Later in 1901–1920 Landsteiner demonstrates the ABO blood group system (Rh antibody was found in 1940). In the 1920s, Michael Heidelberger and Oswald Avery observed that antigens could be precipitated by antibodies and went on to show that antibodies were made of protein. In 1939 Elvin A. Kabat showed that all the three substances (antitoxin, precipitin and agglutinin) were one entity [3]. In the 1960's Edelman, Porter, and Hilschmann elucidated the primary and secondary structure of antibodies [4]. In 1975 Kohler and Milstein invented monoclonal antibody technology while in 1976 Tonegawa cloned the first antibody gene [5]. Since then, much progress has been made in antibodies as therapeutic carriers [6] but challenges remain and it appears that deeper understanding of antibodies mechanisms is required to be overcome significant.
An antibody is a protein produced by the body's immune system when it detects harmful substances, called antigens. When an intruder, such as a virus, bacteria, or other chemical, enters the body, the immune system springs into action. Each antibody contains four polypeptide chains, two identical heavy chains and two identical light chains. The amino terminal ends of the polypeptide chains show considerable variation in amino acid composition and are referred to as the variable regions to distinguish them from the relatively constant regions [7,8].
The variable domains of heavy and light chains comprise the antigen-binding sites of the immunoglobulin molecules [9]. Each immunoglobulin monomer contains two antigen-binding sites and is said to be bivalent. The hinge region is the area of the heavy chains between the first and second constant region domains and is held together by disulfide bonds. This flexible hinge (found in IgG, IgA and IgD, but not IgM or IgE) region allows the distance between the two antigen-binding sites to vary.[10] The variable domain is further subdivided into hypervariable and variable regions. Hypervariable regions have a high ratio of different amino acids in a given position, relative to the most common amino acid in that position. Within hypervariable regions of light and heavy chains, three complementarity-determining regions (CDR) exist—CDR 1, 2 and 3. Also, four fragment regions (FR) which have more stable amino acids sequences separate the CDR regions [11]. CDR regions allow antibodies to recognize an equally diverse number of antigens [12]. The CDRs are responsible for the structural interaction between the antibody V-domains and the antigen shape and size. Antibodies bind antigens through CDRs weak chemical interactions, including hydrogen bonds, electrostatic surface interactions, Van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic interactions [13]. This bonding is essentially non-covalent. In essence the CDRs dictate the antibody specificity and affinity for a specific antigen.
There is a wide use of the antibodies in science [14,15]. Immune molecules such as monoclonal antibodies are used as therapeutics in several disease conditions [16,17]. Also, the immune serum, a serum containing naturally or artificially produced antibodies to a given antigen, obtained from human or animal sources and it is used against pathogens which are capable of evading the immune system in the unstimulated state but which are not robust enough to evade the stimulated immune system [18]. Trends in antibody based diagnosis show advances in assay specificity, detection technologies and sensitivity. Sensitivity and specificity are ensured depending on whether or not the antigen to be quantified competes with labelled antigen for a limited number of antibody binding sites. Antibodies are also used for the treatment of people with cancer [19,20,21,22] with a new class of highly potent biopharmaceutical drugs designed as a targeted therapy[23], called Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) [22,24]. Antibody-drug conjugates have revolutionized the field of cancer chemotherapy. Unlike conventional treatments that damage healthy tissues upon dose escalation, ADCs utilize monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to specifically bind tumour-associated target antigens [25] and deliver a highly potent cytotoxic agent [26].
Variable domains are of major importance in the analysis and the use of antibodies [9]. ADCs for example are complex molecules composed of an antibody (a whole mAb or an antibody fragment such as a single-chain variable fragment [scFv]) linked, via a stable, chemical, linker with labile bonds, to a biological active cytotoxic (anticancer) payload or drug. The variable domains of an antibody consist of a β-sheet framework with hypervariable regions (or complementarity-determining regions [CDRs]) which fashion the antigen-binding site. Due to the big variability of those domains there is an urgent need to establish a set of rules which separate the FR and CDR regions.
When studying the antibodies in more detail there comes to the need to distinguish their regions. For this reason a variety of numbering systems has been used. The Kabat numbering system is a widely adopted standard for numbering the residues in an antibody in a consistent manner. The Kabat Databas initially started in 1970 to determine the combining site of antibodies based on the available amino acid sequences at that time [27]. Bence Jones proteins, mostly from human, were aligned, using the now-known Kabat numbering system, and a quantitative measure, variability, was calculated for every position [27,28]. Other numbering systems are the Chothia Numbering Scheme, the Martin Numbering System and the IMGT Numbering System [29,30].
The IMGT unique numbering relies on the high conservation of the structure of the variable region [31]. This numbering, is set up after aligning more than 5000 sequences, takes into account and combines the definition of the framework (FR) and complementarity determining regions (CDR), structural data from X-ray diffraction studies, and the characterization of the hypervariable loops. The delimitations of the FRM-IMGT and CDR-IMGT regions have been defined, and correspondence between the IMGT numbering and the other numberings has been established. By facilitating comparisons between the sequences and the description of alleles and mutation, the IMGT unique numbering represents a big step forward in the analysis of the immunoglobulin sequences of all species [32]. Moreover, it gives insight into the structural configuration of the variable domain and opens interesting views on the evolution of the sequences of the V-set, since this numbering has been applied with success to all the sequences belonging to the V-set of the immunoglobulin super-family, including non-rearranging sequences in vertebrates and in invertebrates [33,34].
The major goal of this study is to develop a free novel antibodies application which will offer significant information related to antibodies V-domain. Moreover, the generated sample set from each antibodies search could be filtered based on IMGT numbering system. Furthermore, the ability to extract important physiochemical properties information from the antibodies' regions contained in V-domains (FR and CDR regions) [35,36] is also provided.
This application was developed in four steps as shown in the figure 1. This approach was chosen in order to reach the final goal in a clearer and more stable way. The success of this application is based on the proper function of each part separately.
The dataset used for the Antisoma application has been retrieved from the NCBI databases GenBank [37], Uniprot/Swiss-prot [38] and Protein Data Bank [38]. Moreover the dataset correlated with the IMGT/LIGM-DB [39]. For the purposes of this application, amino acid sequences were retrieved in fasta format of full length sequences or 3D solved sequences from 9 different animal species (including Homo sapiens and Mus musculus), as well as some unidentified ones. Along with the fasta format of the IG V-domain sequences, the current IMGT/LIGM-DB annotation [39] metadata was also retrieved, concerning the demarcation of boundaries of the CDR and FR regions within the amino acid sequences. The total number of entries sums up to 6.683 sequences.
In the data filtering step, the IMGT numbering system was used. For the database creation procedure the extracted protein sequences from NCBI databases have been correlated with the IMGT/LIGM-DB data in order to create a database that can answer queries about the CDR and FR regions on each sequence. In addition, the lengths of all regions for each sequence have been tested, against the length limitation given by the IMGT unique numbering system. The expected length for each V-Domain region is given in the Table 1. As a result, it has been found that only 4.059 out of the entries correspond to the IMGT unique numbering system. Each sequence is labelled as "Rejected" with "Yes" or "No".
Region (V-like) | FR1 | CDR1 | FR2 | CDR2 | FR3 | CDR3 | FR4 |
Length (amino acids) | 25–26 | 5–12 | 16–17 | 0–10 | 36–39 | > 2 | 10–12 |
A database was created using the Matlab Stores technologies. More specifically, all V-domain-like protein antibodies sequences were organized in a structure array using element by element organization. Element by element organization allows easier access to all information related to a single antibody entry including species name, protein sequence, sub-domains and sub-regions, and support simple indexing to access the data. Furthermore, element by element organization is the best structure array choice for most sequence processing applications and it can be the best for applications wherein you will routinely need to access corresponding subsets of structure fields. Moreover a structure array is a low memory data type that groups related data using data containers called fields. Each field can contain data of varying types and sizes.
Finally, in each antibody entry more critical information about its hyper variable regions has been added such as the fragment and complementary determine regions after filtering results using the antibodies numbering system rules. In Figure 2 the final total percentage of the antibody protein sequences which have been rejected by applying the length limitation in each sub-region of the hyper variable domain provided by the IMGT numbering system is presented.
Antisoma application has been developed in MATLAB language [40] in the MATLAB R2014a application under a 64-bit Windows 7 operating system and it is compatible with all the 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions. It comes with an executable file which has been exported from the MATLAB environment under the MATLAB license which is distributed from The MathWorks, Inc. and initializes the application in a Windows-running machine with a few easy steps. Antisoma application platform is a menu-driven interface as well as a tab step by step layout which is separated in five main categories "Species", "Filter Options", "Data Set Table", "Biostatistics Tools" and "Biostatistics Features" (Figure 3). It provides the user with a process window to select, filter and save V-domain antibodies sequences from several species, based on the selected antibodies numbering system regions as well as to monitor physicochemical calculations of the selected region of interest (FR and CDR regions).
Antisoma application has been developed in order to provide the information found with this new approach and concerning the antibodies of the species. It provides information about both the filtered and the unfiltered data in a fast and clearly legible way and it is intended to maintain a complete and proper database of immunoglobulins and the information concerning them and also help the relevant scientists in their work. Antisoma elaborates the database that has been created in the previous step. This user-friendly application interacts with the user with a graphical user's interface (GUI) and provides all the information needed. In the first of the five sections the user has the ability to choose between one or more from the available species from which he wants to display the antibodies and the information provided about them. Subsequently, in the second section, under the name "Filter Options', the user has to choose which of the FR and CDR regions of the antibody wants to be extracted from the database. Notice that in this section there are two buttons under the names of "IGV-Like" and "IGV-Like IMGT" which are used for extracting all the hypervariable regions after and before the filtering respectively (Figure 4). The "Data Set Table" section is being used for displaying the results and additionally gives the ability to the user to extract the information in.text, .xls and.mat file by clicking the appropriate buttons (Figure 5). After displaying the results as described in the previous step, a menu appears in the "Biostatistics Tools" section which gives the ability for the user to select between one or more from the immunoglobulins displayed before. By clicking the "General Features" button or the "Specific Features" button, features concerning the selected immunoglobulins based in the molecular operating environment application (MOE) or in 10 critical specific features respectively, in the final section under the name "Biostatistics Features" appears (Figure 6). Also here the ability to extract the information displayed is also provided in the same way as before (Figure 7).
Antisoma has been created with the aim to filter, represent and export data obtained from the NCBI databases. The Database can be represented in its original form or filtered in a way that corresponds to the IMGT unique numbering system [33]. We believe that when it comes to immunoglobulin comparison it is very important that the regions of the IGs in question should be clearly defined and well documented. This way we provide the user with noise-free data concerning the standard lengths of immunoglobulin variable regions and domains. Also, we provide a way to examine the outlying IGs that do not consort with the IMGT unique numbering and get an undistracted view on them. Moreover, the user has access to a large collection of biostatistical metadata for selected IG sequences. All those features, described in detail on previous sections of this article, are represented in a user-friendly, easy-to-install application. Antisoma provides scientists and researchers with normalized data and state-of-the-art biostatistical metadata to help them produce more precise and efficient scientific results.
Better understanding of the detailed variable domains of antibodies will not only benefit the design of monoclonal antibodies and antibodies drug conjugates, but will also pave the way for the full understanding of its role in immune defence. In the presented work, a consolidated platform with correlated information about antibodies hypervariable regions and especially CDRs has been included. In the present application comprehensive information has been contained about all the available antibodies, including sequence, domains, regions and physicochemical properties. This application will be an important tool to support the development of novel therapies. Future goal of the application is the addition of more features such as the inclusion of comprehensive V-domain 3D structural analysis and the discovery of normalized representative forms of their conserved regions. Moreover, a future plan will be to separate the existing antibodies in groups in order to extract critical information related to antibody engineering, ADCs efficient design, modification of the antigens binding affinity and epitope identification of a given antibody.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Llewelyn MB, Hawkins RE, Russell SJ (1992) Discovery of antibodies. BMJ 305: 1269-1272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6864.1269
![]() |
[2] |
Silverstein AM (1999) Paul Ehrlich's passion: the origins of his receptor immunology. Cell Immunol 194: 213-221. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1999.1505
![]() |
[3] |
Kabat EA, Furth J (1940) Chemical and Immunological Studies on the Agent Producing Leukosis and Sarcoma of Fowls. J Exp Med 71: 55-70. doi: 10.1084/jem.71.1.55
![]() |
[4] |
Ribatti D (2015) Edelman's view on the discovery of antibodies. Immunol Lett 164: 72-75. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2015.02.005
![]() |
[5] | Liu JK (2014) The history of monoclonal antibody development - Progress, remaining challenges and future innovations. Ann Med Surg (Lond. 3): 113-116. |
[6] |
Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ (2012) Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 278-287. doi: 10.1038/nrc3236
![]() |
[7] | Novotný J, Bruccoleri R, Newell J, et al. (1983) Molecular anatomy of the antibody binding site. J Biol Chem 258: 14433-14437. |
[8] |
Coleclough C (1983) Chance, necessity and antibody gene dynamics. Nature 303: 23-26. doi: 10.1038/303023a0
![]() |
[9] | Chothia C, Novotný J, Bruccoleri R, et al. (1985) Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. J Mol Biol 186: 651-663. |
[10] |
Maltezos A, Platis D, Vlachakis D, et al. (2014) Design, synthesis and application of benzyl-sulfonate biomimetic affinity adsorbents for monoclonal antibody purification from transgenic corn. J Mol Recognit 27: 19-31. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2327
![]() |
[11] | Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, et al.(1989) Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 342: 877-883. |
[12] |
Kovtun YV, Goldmacher VS (2007) Cell killing by antibody-drug conjugates. Cancer Lett 255: 232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.04.010
![]() |
[13] | Sela-Culang I, Kunik V, Ofran Y (2013) The structural basis of antibody-antigen recognition. Front Immunol 4: 302. |
[14] |
Shirai H, Prades C, Vita R, et al. (2014) Antibody informatics for drug discovery. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844: 2002-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.07.006
![]() |
[15] |
Winter G. Milstein C (1991) Man-made antibodies. Nature 349: 293-299. doi: 10.1038/349293a0
![]() |
[16] | Fajardo-Ramirez OR, Ascacio-Martinez JA, Licea-Navarro AF, et al. (2015) Technological Evolution in the Development of Therapeutic Antibodies. Rev Invest Clin 67: 158-169. |
[17] |
Wang J, Bu D, Zhu X (2007) Immunoglobulin variable region gene analysis to the autoantibody-secreting B cells from tumors in association with paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome. Int J Dermatol 46: 1146-1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03267.x
![]() |
[18] |
Peters C, Brown S (2015) Antibody-drug conjugates as novel anti-cancer chemotherapeutics. Biosci Rep 35: e00225. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150089
![]() |
[19] |
Zhang N, Deng H, Fan X, et al. (2015) Dysfunctional antibodies in the tumor microenvironment associate with impaired anticancer immunity. Clin Cancer Res 21: 5380-5390. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1057
![]() |
[20] |
Campa MJ, Gottlin EB, Bushey RT, et al. (2015) Complement Factor H Antibodies from Lung Cancer Patients Induce Complement Dependent Lysis of Tumor Cells, Suggesting a Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategy. Cancer Immunol Res 3: 1325-1332. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0122
![]() |
[21] |
Zitvogel L, Kroemer G (2015) Cancer: Antibodies regulate antitumour immunity. Nature 521: 35-37. doi: 10.1038/nature14388
![]() |
[22] |
Papageorgiou L, Cuong NT, Vlachakis D (2016) Antibodies as stratagems against cancer. Mol Biosyst 12: 2047-2055. doi: 10.1039/C5MB00699F
![]() |
[23] |
Kumar S, King L E, Clark T H, et al. (2015) Antibody-drug conjugates nonclinical support: from early to late nonclinical bioanalysis using ligand-binding assays. Bioanalysis 7: 1605-1617. doi: 10.4155/bio.15.107
![]() |
[24] |
Gorovits B (2015) Bioanalysis of antibody-drug conjugates. Bioanalysis 7: 1559-1560. doi: 10.4155/bio.15.106
![]() |
[25] |
Merten H, Brandl F, Plückthun A, et al. (2015) Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Tumor Targeting-Novel Conjugation Chemistries and the Promise of non-IgG Binding Proteins. Bioconjug Chem 26: 2176-2185. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00260
![]() |
[26] |
Hamilton GS (2015) Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy: The technological and regulatory challenges of developing drug-biologic hybrids. Biologicals 43: 318-332. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.05.006
![]() |
[27] |
Johnson G, Wu TT (2000) Kabat database and its applications: 30 years after the first variability plot. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 214-218. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.214
![]() |
[28] |
Abhinandan KR, Martin AC (2008) Analysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains. Mol Immunol 45: 3832-3839. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.05.022
![]() |
[29] |
Lefranc MP (2014) Immunoinformatics of the V, C, and G domains: IMGT(R) definitive system for IG, TR and IgSF, MH, and MhSF. Methods Mol Biol 1184: 59-107. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_4
![]() |
[30] | Lefranc MP (2014) Antibody Informatics: IMGT, the International ImMunoGeneTics Information System. Microbiol Spectr: 363-379. |
[31] | Lefranc MP (2011) IMGT unique numbering for the variable (V), constant (C), and groove (G) domains of IG, TR, MH, IgSF, and MhSF. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011: 633-642. |
[32] | Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Duroux P, et al. (2014) IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system® 25 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 43: D413-D422. |
[33] |
Lefranc MP, Pommié C, Ruiz M, et al. (2003) IMGT unique numbering for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor variable domains and Ig superfamily V-like domains. Dev Comp Immunol 27: 55-77. doi: 10.1016/S0145-305X(02)00039-3
![]() |
[34] |
Lefranc MP (2014) Immunoglobulins: 25 years of immunoinformatics and IMGT-ONTOLOGY. Biomolecules 4: 1102-1139. doi: 10.3390/biom4041102
![]() |
[35] |
Alamyar E, Giudicelli V, Duroux P, et al. (2014) Antibody V and C domain sequence, structure, and interaction analysis with special reference to IMGT(R). Methods Mol Biol 1131: 337-381. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-992-5_21
![]() |
[36] |
Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, et al. (2013) Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501: 212-216. doi: 10.1038/nature12443
![]() |
[37] |
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, et al. (2017) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 45: D37-D42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1070
![]() |
[38] |
Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH, et al. (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45: D158-D169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1099
![]() |
[39] |
Giudicelli V, Duroux P, Ginestoux C, et al. (2006) IMGT/LIGM-DB, the IMGT comprehensive database of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D781-D784. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj088
![]() |
[40] | Sobie EA (2011) An introduction to MATLAB. Sci Signal 4: tr7. |
1. | Dimitrios Vlachakis, 2021, Chapter 53-1, 978-3-319-75479-6, 1, 10.1007/978-3-319-75479-6_53-1 | |
2. | Dimitrios Vlachakis, 2020, Chapter 13, 978-3-030-60734-0, 113, 10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_13 | |
3. | Louis Papageorgiou, Eleni Papakonstantinou, Constantinos Salis, Eleytheria Polychronidou, Marianna Hagidimitriou, Dimitris Maroulis, Elias Eliopoulos, Dimitrios Vlachakis, 2020, Chapter 18, 978-3-030-32621-0, 203, 10.1007/978-3-030-32622-7_18 | |
4. | Dimitrios Vlachakis, 2023, Chapter 53, 978-3-319-75921-0, 953, 10.1007/978-3-319-75922-7_53 |
Region (V-like) | FR1 | CDR1 | FR2 | CDR2 | FR3 | CDR3 | FR4 |
Length (amino acids) | 25–26 | 5–12 | 16–17 | 0–10 | 36–39 | > 2 | 10–12 |