In the current study, a novel multi-term mixed sub-diffusion and wave-diffusion model was considered. The new model has a unique time-space coupled derivative in addition to having the diffusion-wave and sub-diffusion terms concurrently. Typically, an elliptic equation in the space variable is obtained by applying a finite difference time-stepping procedure. The severe stability restrictions are the main disadvantage of the finite difference method in time. It has been demonstrated that the Laplace transform is an excellent choice for solving diffusion problems and offers a substitute to the finite difference approach. In this paper, a method based on Laplace transform coupled with the pseudospectral method was developed for the novel model. The proposed method has three main steps: First, the model was reduced to a time-independent model via Laplace transform; second, the pseudospectral method was employed for spatial discretization; and finally, the inverse Laplace transform was applied to transform the obtained solution in Laplace transform domain back into a real domain. We also presented the numerical scheme's stability and convergence analysis. To demonstrate our method's efficacy, four problems were examined.
Citation: Farman Ali Shah, Kamran, Dania Santina, Nabil Mlaiki, Salma Aljawi. Application of a hybrid pseudospectral method to a new two-dimensional multi-term mixed sub-diffusion and wave-diffusion equation of fractional order[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(1): 44-85. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024003
[1] |
Linglong Du, Min Yang .
Pointwise long time behavior for the mixed damped nonlinear wave equation in |
[2] |
Linglong Du .
Long time behavior for the visco-elastic damped wave equation in |
[3] | Hantaek Bae . On the local and global existence of the Hall equations with fractional Laplacian and related equations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2022, 17(4): 645-663. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2022021 |
[4] | Günter Leugering, Sergei A. Nazarov, Jari Taskinen . The band-gap structure of the spectrum in a periodic medium of masonry type. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15(4): 555-580. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020014 |
[5] | Seung-Yeal Ha, Gyuyoung Hwang, Hansol Park . Emergent behaviors of Lohe Hermitian sphere particles under time-delayed interactions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(3): 459-492. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021013 |
[6] | Arianna Giunti . Convergence rates for the homogenization of the Poisson problem in randomly perforated domains. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(3): 341-375. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021009 |
[7] | Francesca Alessio, Piero Montecchiari, Andrea Sfecci . Saddle solutions for a class of systems of periodic and reversible semilinear elliptic equations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(3): 567-587. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019022 |
[8] | Ciro D'Apice, Olha P. Kupenko, Rosanna Manzo . On boundary optimal control problem for an arterial system: First-order optimality conditions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(4): 585-607. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018027 |
[9] | María Anguiano, Francisco Javier Suárez-Grau . Newtonian fluid flow in a thin porous medium with non-homogeneous slip boundary conditions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(2): 289-316. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019012 |
[10] | Wen Shen . Traveling waves for conservation laws with nonlocal flux for traffic flow on rough roads. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(4): 709-732. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019028 |
In the current study, a novel multi-term mixed sub-diffusion and wave-diffusion model was considered. The new model has a unique time-space coupled derivative in addition to having the diffusion-wave and sub-diffusion terms concurrently. Typically, an elliptic equation in the space variable is obtained by applying a finite difference time-stepping procedure. The severe stability restrictions are the main disadvantage of the finite difference method in time. It has been demonstrated that the Laplace transform is an excellent choice for solving diffusion problems and offers a substitute to the finite difference approach. In this paper, a method based on Laplace transform coupled with the pseudospectral method was developed for the novel model. The proposed method has three main steps: First, the model was reduced to a time-independent model via Laplace transform; second, the pseudospectral method was employed for spatial discretization; and finally, the inverse Laplace transform was applied to transform the obtained solution in Laplace transform domain back into a real domain. We also presented the numerical scheme's stability and convergence analysis. To demonstrate our method's efficacy, four problems were examined.
In this paper, we study the pointwise long time behavior of the solution for the nonlinear wave equation with frictional and visco-elastic damping terms
{∂2tu−c2Δu+ν1∂tu−ν2∂tΔu=f(u),u|t=0=u0(x),ut|t=0=u1(x), | (1) |
in multi-dimensional half space
(a1∂x1u+a2u)(x1=0,x′,t)=0. | (2) |
Over the past few decades, many mathematicians have concentrated on solving different kinds of damped nonlinear wave equations. The first kind is called the frictional damped wave equation, which is given as follows
{∂2tu−c2Δu+ν∂tu=f(u),u|t=0=u0(x),ut|t=0=u1(x), | (3) |
see [9,19,20,23] for the references. It is showed that for the long time, the fundamental solution for the linear system of (3) behaves like the Gauss kernel
{∂2tu−c2Δu−ν∂tΔu=f(u),u|t=0=u0(x),ut|t=0=u1(x). | (4) |
One can refer to [22] for the decaying rate of the linear solution, [11,12] for the asymptotic profiles of the linear problem, [4,21] for the nonlinear equation, etc. In [9], the authors studied the fundamental solution for the linear system of (4). The results show that the hyperbolic wave transport mechanism and the visco-elastic damped mechanism interact with each other so that the solution behaves like the convented heat kernel, i.e.,
For the initial-boundary value problem of the different damped wave equations, many authors studied the global well-posedness existence, long time behaviors, global attractors and decaying rate estimates of some elementary wave by using delicate energy estimate method, for example [1,13,25,26,28,29]. In this paper, we will use the pointwise estimate technique to give the long time behavior of the solution for system (1) with boundary condition (2). The main part of this technique is the construction and estimation of the Green's functions for the following linear systems:
{∂2tG1−c2ΔG1+ν1∂tG1−ν2∂tΔG1=0,x1,y1>0,x′∈Rn−1,t>0,G1(x1,x′,0;y1)=δ(x1−y1)δ(x′),G1t(x1,x′,0;y1)=0,a1∂x1G1(0,x′,t;y1)+a2G1(0,x′,t;y1)=0; | (5) |
{∂2tG2−c2ΔG2+ν1∂tG2−ν2∂tΔG2=0,x1,y1>0,x′∈Rn−1,t>0,G2(x1,x′,0;y1)=0,G2t(x1,x′,0;y1)=δ(x1−y1)δ(x′),a1∂x1G2(0,x′,t;y1)+a2G2(0,x′,t;y1)=0. | (6) |
The way of estimating the Green's functions
With the help of the accurate expression of Green's functions for the linear half space problem and the Duhamel's principle, we get the pointwise long time behavior for the nonlinear solution
Theorem 1.1. Let
|∂αxu0,∂αxu1|≤O(1)ε(1+|x|2)−r, r>n2, |α|≤1, |
|∂αxu(x,t)|≤O(1)ε(1+t)−|α|/2(1+t+|x|2)−n2. |
Moreover, we get the following optimal
‖∂αxu(⋅,t)‖Lp(Rn+)≤O(1)ε(1+t)−n2(1−1p)−|α|2, p∈(1,∞]. |
Remark 1. We can develop a similar theorem for the case of higher space dimension with a suitable choice of
Notations. Let
f(ξ,t):=F[f](ξ,t)=∫Rne−iξ⋅xf(x,t)dx,f(x,s):=L[f](x,s)=∫∞0e−stf(x,t)dt. |
The rest of paper is arranged as follows: in Section 2, we study the fundamental solutions for the linear Cauchy problem and give a pointwise description of the fundamental solutions in
The fundamental solutions for the linear damped wave equations are defined by
{∂2tG1−c2ΔG1+ν1∂tG1−ν2∂tΔG1=0G1(x,0)=δ(x),G1t(x,0)=0, | (7) |
{∂2tG2−c2ΔG2+ν1∂tG2−ν2∂tΔG2=0G2(x,0)=0,G2t(x,0)=δ(x). | (8) |
Applying the Fourier transform to (7) and (8) in the space variable
G1(ξ,t)=σ+eσ−t−σ−eσ+tσ+−σ−, G2(ξ,t)=eσ+t−eσ−tσ+−σ−,σ±=−ν1+ν2|ξ|22±12√ν21+(2ν1ν2−4c2)|ξ|2+ν22|ξ|4. |
In [16], authors have studied the pointwise estimates of the fundamental solutions by long wave-short wave decomposition in the Fourier space. Here we will use the local analysis and inverse Fourier transform to get the pointwise structures of the fundamental solutions in the physical variables
f(x,t)=fL(x,t)+fS(x,t),F[fL]=H(1−|ξ|ε0)F[f](ξ,t),F[fS]=(1−H(1−|ξ|ε0))F[f](ξ,t), |
with the parameter
H(x)={1, x>0,0, x<0. |
Long wave component. When
{σ+=−c2|ξ|2ν1+o(|ξ|2),σ−=−ν1+(−ν2+c2ν1)|ξ|2+o(|ξ|2), |
σ+−σ−=ν1+(ν1ν2−2c2)|ξ|2ν1+o(|ξ|2). |
Then
σ+eσ−t=(−c2|ξ|2ν1+o(|ξ|2))e(−ν1+(−ν2+c2ν1)|ξ|2+o(|ξ|2))t=−c2ν1|ξ|2e−ν1t+o(|ξ|2)e−Ct,σ−eσ+t=(−ν1+(−ν2+c2ν1)|ξ|2+o(|ξ|2))e(−c2|ξ|2ν1+o(|ξ|2))t=−ν1e−c2ν1|ξ|2t+O(|ξ|2)e−C|ξ|2t,1σ+−σ−=1ν1+O(|ξ|2). |
So we can approximate the fundamental solutions as follows
σ+eσ−t−σ−eσ+tσ+−σ−=−c2|ξ|2ν21e−ν1t+e−c2ν1|ξ|2t+o(|ξ|2)e−Ct+O(|ξ|2)e−C|ξ|2t,eσ+t−eσ−tσ+−σ−=1ν1e−c2ν1|ξ|2t−1ν1e−ν1t+O(|ξ|2)e−Ct+o(|ξ|2)e−C|ξ|2t. |
Using Lemma 5.1 in Appendix, for
|DαxGL1(x,t)|≤O(1)(e−|x|2C(t+1)(1+t)n+|α|2+e−|x|+tC),|DαxGL2(x,t)|≤O(1)(e−|x|2C(t+1)(1+t)n+|α|2+e−|x|+tC). |
Short wave component. We adopt the local analysis method to give a description about all types of singular functions for the short wave component of the fundamental solutions. When
{σ+=−c2ν2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν321|ξ|2+O(|ξ|−4),σ−=−σ+−(ν1+ν2|ξ|2). |
This non-decaying property results in the singularities of the fundamental solution
{σ∗+=−c2ν2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32(11+|ξ|2+1(1+|ξ|2)2)+c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32O((1+|ξ|2)−3),σ∗−=−σ∗+−(ν1+ν2|ξ|2), |
infξ∈Dε0|σ∗−(ξ)−σ∗+(ξ)|>0,supξ∈Dε0Re(σ∗±(ξ))≤−J0, supξ∈Dε0|ξ|8|σ±(ξ)−σ∗±(ξ)|<∞ as |ξ|→∞. |
Therefore, the approximated analytic spectra
|σ+eσ−t−σ−eσ+tσ+−σ−−σ∗+eσ∗−t−σ∗−eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−, eσ+t−eσ−tσ+−σ−−eσ∗+t−eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−|≤O(1)(1+|ξ|2)4. |
By Lemma 5.4 in the Appendix, we have
‖F−1[σ+eσ−t−σ−eσ+tσ+−σ−−σ∗+eσ∗−t−σ∗−eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−](⋅,t)‖L∞(Rn)=O(1),‖F−1[eσ+t−eσ−tσ+−σ−−eσ∗+t−eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−](⋅,t)‖L∞(Rn)=O(1), |
which asserts that all singularities are contained in
Now we seek out all the singularities. For the short wave part of
σ∗+eσ∗−t−σ∗−eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−=eσ∗+t−σ∗+eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−+σ∗+eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−. |
The first term is
eσ∗+t=e−c2tν2ec2(ν1ν2−c2)tν3211+|ξ|2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)tν321(1+|ξ|2)2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)tν32O(1(1+|ξ|2)3)=e−c2tν2(1+c2(ν1ν2−c2)tν3211+|ξ|2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)tν321(1+|ξ|2)2)+e−c2tν2c2(ν1ν2−c2)tν32O(1(1+|ξ|2)3)=e−c2tν2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32te−c2tν21+|ξ|2+c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32te−c2tν2(1+|ξ|2)2+te−c2tν2c2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32O(1(1+|ξ|2)3). |
It can be estimated as follows
|F−1[eσ∗+t]−e−c2t/ν2δ(x)−tc2(ν1ν2−c2)ν−32e−c2t/ν2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC. |
The second term contains no singularities and we have
σ∗+eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−=−c2ν−22e−c2t/ν21+|ξ|2+e−c2tν2O(1(1+|ξ|2)2), |
so
|F−1[σ∗+eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−]+c2v−22e−c2t/v2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC. |
For the third term, the function
|σ∗+eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−|≤K0e−|ξ|2t/C1−J∗0t1+|ξ|2, |
∫Im(ξk)=δ1≤k≤n|σ∗+eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−|dξ≤C∫Rne−|ξ|2t/C−J∗0t(1+|ξ|)2dξ=CΓ(n)∫∞0e−r2t/C−J∗0t(1+r)2rn−1dr≤Ce−t/CLn(t), | (9) |
where
Ln(t)≡{1,n=1,log(t),n=2,t−n−22,n≥3. |
We denote
j1(x,t):=F−1[σ∗+eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−], |
following the way of proof for Lemma 5.4, we get
|j1(x,t)|≤Ce−(|x|+t)/CLn(t) |
from (9). So the following estimate for
|GS1(x,t)−j1(x,t)−e−c2t/ν2δn(x)−(tc2ν−32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν−22)e−c2t/ν2Yn(x)|≤e−|x|+tC. |
For the short wave part of
eσ∗+t−eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−=eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−−eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−. |
The first term is
eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−=ν−12e−c2t/ν21+|ξ|2+e−c2tν2O(1(1+|ξ|2)2), |
and we have
|F−1[eσ∗+tσ∗+−σ∗−]−ν−12e−c2t/ν2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC. |
The second term contains no singularities. If denoting
j2(x,t)≡−F−1(eσ∗−tσ∗+−σ∗−), |
then there exists
|j2(x,t)|≤Ce−(|x|+t)/CLn(t), |
and we have the following estimate for
|GS2(x,t)−j2(x,t)−ν−12e−c2t/ν2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC. |
Hence the short wave components have the following estimates in the finite Mach number region
|GS1(x,t)−j1(x,t)−e−c2tν2δn(x)−(tc2(ν1ν2−c2)ν32+c2ν22)e−c2tν2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC.|GS2(x,t)−j2(x,t)−ν−12e−c2tν2Yn(x)|≤Ce−|x|+tC. |
Outside the finite Mach number region
We choose the weighted function
wt=−aMw,∇w=xM|x|w,Δw=wM2. |
Consider the linear damped wave equation outside the finite Mach number region:
{∂2tui−c2Δui+ν1∂tui−ν2∂tΔui=0,|x|≥3(t+1),ui|t=0=0,uit|t=0=0,ui||x|=3(t+1)=Gi||x|=3(t+1). | (10) |
Denote the outside finite Mach number region
c2∫∂Dtw∂tui∇ui⋅d→Sx+ν2∫∂Dtw∂tui∂t∇ui⋅d→Sx=12ddt∫Dtw((∂tui)2+c2|∇ui|2)dx+∫Dt(ν1w−12wt−12ν2Δw)(∂tui)2dx+c2∫Dt∂tui∇w⋅∇uidx+ac22M∫Dtw|∇ui|2dx+ν2∫Dtw|∂t∇ui|2dx=12ddt∫Dtw((∂tui)2+c2|∇ui|2)dx+∫Dt(ν1+a2M−ν22M2)w(∂tui)2dx+c2∫Dtw∂tuixM|x|⋅∇uidx+ac22M∫Dtw|∇ui|2dx+ν2∫Dtw|∂t∇ui|2dx≥12ddt∫Dtw((∂tui)2+c2|∇ui|2)dx+∫Dtw(ac24M|∇ui|2+(ν12+a2M−ν22M2)(∂tui)2+ν2|∂t∇ui|2)dx. |
On the boundary
|∂tui|,|∇ui|,|∂t∇ui|≤Ce−Ct, x∈∂Dt. |
So
ddt∫Dtw((∂tui)2+c2|∇ui|2)dx+2δ0∫Dtw((∂tui)2+c2|∇ui|2)dx≤Ce−Ct, | (11) |
One can also get similar estimates for any higher order derivatives
l∑|α|=1(ddt∫Rnw((∂t∂αxui)2+c2|∇∂αxui|2)dx) +δ|α|∫Rnw((∂t∂αxui)2+c2|∇∂αxui|2)dx)≤Ce−Ct. | (12) |
Integrating (11) and (12) over
sup(x,t)∈Dt((∂t∂αxui)2+c2|∇∂αxui|2)≤Ce−(|x|−at)/C≤Ce−(|x|+t)/C, for |α|<l−n2, |
since
|DαxGi(x,t)|≤Ce−(|x|+t)/C, for |α|<l−n2. |
To summarize, we have the following pointwise estimates for the fundamental solutions:
Lemma 2.1. The fundamental solutions have the following estimates for all
|Dαx(G1(x,t)−j1(x,t)−e−c2t/ν2δn(x)−(tc2ν−32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν−22)e−c2t/ν2Yn(x))|≤O(1)(e−|x|2C(t+1)(t+1)n+|α|2+e−(|x|+t)/C),|Dαx(G2(x,t)−j2(x,t)−ν−12e−c2t/ν2Yn(x))|≤O(1)(e−|x|2C(t+1)(t+1)n+|α|2+e−(|x|+t)/C). |
Here
|j1(x,t),j2(x,t)|≤O(1)Ln(t)e−(|x|+t)/C,L2(t)=log(t), Ln(t)=t−n−22 for n≥3,Y2(x)=O(1)12πBesselK0(|x|), Yn(x)=O(1)e−|x||x|n−2 for n≥3. |
Applying Laplace transform in
G1(ξ,s)=s+ν1+ν2|ξ|2s2+ν1s+(c2+ν2s)|ξ|2, G2(ξ,s)=1s2+ν1s+(c2+ν2s)|ξ|2. |
Now we give a lemma:
Lemma 2.2.
12π∫Reiξ1x1s2+ν1s+ν2s|ξ|2+c2|ξ|2dξ1=1ν2s+c2e−λ|x1|2λ, |
where
Proof. We prove it by using the contour integral and the residue theorem. Note that
12π∫Reiξ1x1s2+ν1s+ν2s|ξ|2+c2|ξ|2dξ1=12π1ν2s+c2∫Reiξ1x1ξ21+|ξ′|2+s2+ν1sν2s+c2dξ1=12π1ν2s+c2∫Reiξ1x1(ξ1−λi)(ξ1+λi)dξ1. |
Define a closed path
If
12π1ν2s+c2∫Reiξ1x1(ξ1−λi)(ξ1+λi)dξ1=12π1ν2s+c22πiRes(eiξ1x1(ξ1−λi)(ξ1+λi)|ξ1=λi)=e−λx12(ν2s+c2)λ. |
The computation for the case
12π1ν2s+c2∫Reiξ1x1(ξ1−λi)(ξ1+λi)dξ1=−12π1ν2s+c22πiRes(eiξ1x1(ξ1−λi)(ξ1+λi)|ξ1=−λi)=eλx12(ν2s+c2)λ. |
Hence we prove this lemma.
With the help of Lemma 2.2, we get the expression of fundamental solutions
G1(x1,ξ′,s)=1ν2s+c2(ν2δ(x1)+c2(s+ν1)ν2s+c2e−λ|x1|2λ),G2(x1,ξ′,s)=e−λ|x1|2λ(ν2s+c2). |
In particular, when
G1(−ˉx1,ξ′,s)=c2(s+ν1)(ν2s+c2)2e−λˉx12λ, G2(−ˉx1,ξ′,s)=e−λˉx12λ(ν2s+c2). |
In this section, we will give the pointwise estimates of the Green's functions for the initial boundary value problem. Firstly, we compute the transformed Green's functions in the partial-Fourier and Laplace transformed space. Then by comparing the symbols of the fundamental solutions and the Green's functions in this transformed space, we get the simplified expressions of Green's functions for the initial-boundary value problem. With the help of the pointwise estimates of the fundamental solutions and boundary operator, we finally get the sharp estimates of Green functions for the half space linear problem.
Before computing, we make the initial value zero by considering the error function
{∂2tRi−c2ΔRi+ν1∂tRi−ν2∂tΔRi=0,x∈Rn+,t>0,Ri|t=0=0,Rit|t=0=0,(a1∂x1+a2)Ri(0,x′,t;y1)=−(a1∂x1+a2)Gi(x1−y1,x′,t)|x1=0. |
Taking Fourier transform only with respect to the tangential spatial variable
{(s2+ν1s)Ri−(c2+ν2s)Rix1x1+(c2+ν2s)|ξ′|2Ri=0,(a1∂x1+a2)Ri(0,ξ′,s;y1)=(a1∂y1−a2)Gi(−y1,ξ′,s)=−(a1λ+a2)Gi(−y1,ξ′,s). |
Solving it and dropping out the divergent mode as
Ri(x1,ξ′,s;y1)=−a1λ+a2a2−a1λe−λx1Gi(−y1,ξ′,s)=−a1λ+a2a2−a1λGi(x1+y1,ξ′,s), |
where
Therefore the transformed Green's functions
Gi(x1,ξ′,s;y1)=Gi(x1−y1,ξ′,s)−a1λ+a2a2−a1λGi(x1+y1,ξ′,s)=Gi(x1−y1,ξ′,s)+Gi(x1+y1,ξ′,s)−2a2a2−a1λGi(x1+y1,ξ′,s), |
which reveal the connection between fundamental solutions and the Green's functions.
Hence,
Gi(x1,x′,t;y1)=Gi(x1−y1,x′,t)+Gi(x1+y1,x′,t)−F−1ξ′→x′L−1s→t[2a2a2−a1λ]∗x′,tGi(x1+y1,x′,t). |
Now we estimate the boundary operator
Instead of inverting the boundary symbol, we follow the differential equation method. Notice that
F−1ξ′→x′L−1s→t[2a2a2−a1λGi(x1+y1,ξ′,s)]=2a2a1∂x1+a2Gi(x1+y1,x′,t), |
setting
g(x1,x′,t)≡2a2a1∂x1+a2Gi(x1,x′,t), |
then the function
(a2+a1∂x1)g=2a2Gi(x1,x′,t). |
Solving this ODE gives
g(x1,x′,t)=2γ∫∞x1e−γ(z−x1)Gi(z,x′,t)dz=2γ∫∞0e−γzGi(x1+z,x′,t)dz. | (13) |
Summarizing previous results we obtain
Lemma 3.1. The Green's functions
Gi(x1,x′,t;y1)=GLi(x1,x′,t;y1)+GSi(x1,x′,t;y1). |
Meanwhile, the following estimates hold:
|DαxGLi(x1,x′,t;y1)|≤O(1)(e−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t+1)(t+1)n+|α|2+e−(x1+y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t+1)(t+1)n+|α|2),|α|≥0; |
|GS1(x1,x′,t;y1)|≤O(1)(j1(x1−y1,x′,t)+j1(x1+y1,x′,t)+e−c2tν2(δn(x1−y1,x′)+δn(x1+y1,x′))+e−c2tν2(tc2ν−32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν−22)(Yn(x1−y1,x′)+Yn(x1+y1,x′))) |
and
|GS2(x1,x′,t;y1)|≤O(1)(j1(x1−y1,x′,t)+j2(x1+y1,x′,t)+ν−12e−c2tν2(Yn(x1−y1,x′)+Yn(x1+y1,x′))). |
Proof. Note that
Gi(x1,x′,t;y1)=Gi(x1−y1,x′,t)+Gi(x1+y1,x′,t)−g(x1+y1,x′,t), |
based on the long-wave short-wave decomposition of the fundamental solutions
Gi(x,t)=GLi(x,t)+GSi(x,t), |
we can write
GLi(x1,x′,t;y1)=O(1)(GLi(x1−y1,x′,t)+GLi(x1+y1,x′,t)),GSi(x1,x′,t;y1)=O(1)(GSi(x1−y1,x′,t)+GSi(x1+y1,x′,t)), |
and get the estimates directly from Lemma 2.1 and (13).
The study of boundary operator in the last section suggests that we can only consider the case
Now we give the pointwise long time behavior of the solution for the nonlinear problem and prove the Theorem 1.1. The Green's functions
∂αxu(x,t)=∂αx∫Rn+(G1(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u0(y)+G2(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u1(y))dy+∂αx∫t0∫Rn+G2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ≡∂αxI(x,t)+∂αxN(x,t). | (14) |
The initial part
∂αxI(x,t)=∂αxIL(x,t)+∂αxIS(x,t), |
where
∂αxIL(x,t)=∂αx∫Rn+(GL1(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u0(y)+GL2(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u1(y))dy∂αxIS(x,t)=∂αx∫Rn+(GS1(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u0(y)+GS2(x1,x′−y′,t;y1)u1(y))dy. |
By lemma 5.2, we have the following estimates in the finite Mach number region
|IL(x,t)|≤O(1)ε∫Rn+e−(x−y)2C(t+1)(t+1)n2(1+|y|2)−rdy≤O(1)ε(e−x2C(t+1)(t+1)n2+(1+t+|x|2)−n2), | (15) |
|IS(x,t)|≤O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn(Ln(t)+δn(x−y) +[tc2ν32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν22]Yn(x−y))(1+|y|2)−rdy|+O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn(Ln(t)+ν−12Yn(x−y))(1+|y|2)−rdy|≤O(1)ε(e−x2C(t+1)(t+1)n2+(1+t+|x|2)−n2). | (16) |
Hence we combine (15) and (16) to get the estimate of the first part in (14) when
|I(x,t)|≤O(1)ε(e−x2C(t+1)(t+1)n2+(1+t+|x|2)−n2). | (17) |
Similarly, when
|∂αxI(x,t)|=|∂αxIL(x,t)+∂αxIS(x,t)|≤O(1)ε∫Rn+(e−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t+1)(t+1)n2+12+e−(x1+y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t+1)(t+1)n2+12)(1+|y|2)−rdy+1{∂αx=∂x1}O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn−1Ln(t)+δn(x1−y1,x′−y′,t) +δn(x1+y1,x′−y′,t)+(tc2ν−32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν−22) (Yn(x1−y1,x′−y′)+Yn(x1+y1,x′−y′))(1+|y|2)−rdy′|y1=0|+O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn+Ln(t)+δn(x1−y1,x′−y′,t)+δn(x1+y1,x′−y′,t) +(tc2ν−32(ν1ν2−c2)+c2ν−22) (Yn(x1−y1,x′−y′)+Yn(x1+y1,x′−y′))(1+|y|2)−rdy|+1{∂αx=∂x1}O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn−1(Ln(t)+ν−11Yn(x1−y1,x′−y′) +ν−11Yn(x1+y1,x′−y′))(1+|y|2)−rdy′|y1=0|+O(1)εe−(|x|+t)C|∫Rn−1(Ln(t)+ν−11Yn(x1−y1,x′−y′) +ν−11Yn(x1+y1,x′−y′))(1+|y|2)−rdy|≤O(1)ε(1+t)−|α|2(e−x22C(t+1)(t+1)n2+(1+t+|x|2)−r)+O(1)εe−(|x|+t)/C. |
where
1{∂αx=∂x1}={1, if ∂αx=∂x1,0, otherwise. |
Here we use the integration by parts to estimate the short wave component part. Outside the finite Mach number region, we have
|∂αxI(x,t)|≤O(1)εe−ν1t∫Rn+e−|x−y|(1+y2)−rdy≤O(1)εe−ν1t(1+|x|2)−r,|α|≤1. | (18) |
Based on the estimates of (17)-(18), the ansatz is posed for the solution as follows:
|∂αxu(x,t)|≤O(1)ε(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2,|α|≤1. |
Straightforward computations show that
|f(u)(x,t)|≤O(1)εk(1+t+|x|2)−nk2. |
Now we justify the ansatz for the nonlinear term. For
|N(x,t)|=|∫t0∫Rn+G2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|≤|∫t0∫Rn+GL2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|+|∫t0∫Rn+GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|=N1+N2. |
Using Lemma 5.3, one gets
N1≤O(1)εk|∫t0∫∞0∫Rn−1(e−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2+e−(x1+y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2) (1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dy′dy1dτ|≤O(1)εk|∫t0∫Rne−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2(1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dydτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t+|x|2)−n2, |
N2≤O(1)εk|∫t0∫Rn+e−c2(t−τ)ν2(Ln(t−τ)+ν−12Yn(x1,x′−y′;y1)) (1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dydτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t+|x|2)−n2. |
Now we compute the estimate of
|∂αxN(x,t)|=|∂αx∫t0∫Rn+G2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|≤|∫t0∫Rn+∂αxGL2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|+|∫t0∫Rn+∂αxGS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|=∂αxN1+∂αxN2. |
Similarly we have
∂αxN1=|O(1)εk∫t0∫∞0∫Rn−1(e−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2+|α|2+e−(x1+y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2+|α|2) (1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dy′dy1dτ|≤|O(1)εk∫t0∫Rne−(x1−y1)2+(x′−y′)2C(t−τ+1)(t−τ+1)n2+|α|2(1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dydτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2, |
∂αxN2=|∫t0∫Rn+∂αxGS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dydτ|=1{∂αx=∂x1}|∫t0∫Rn−1GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dy′|y1=0dτ|+|∫t0∫Rn+GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)∂αyf(u)(y,τ)dydτ|. | (19) |
The boundary term in (19) has the following estimates:
|∫t0∫Rn−1GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dy′|y1=0dτ|≤|(∫t/20+∫tt/2)∫Rn−1GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)f(u)(y,τ)dy′|y1=0dτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2. |
The second term in (19) satisfies
|∫t0∫Rn+GS2(x1,x′−y′,t−τ;y1)∂αyf(u)(y,τ)dydτ|≤|O(1)εk∫t0∫Rn+e−c2(t−τ)ν2(Ln(t−τ)+ν−12Yn(x1,x′−y′;y1))≤(1+τ)−|α|2(1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dydτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2. |
Therefore one has the following estimate for the nonlinear term
|∂αxN|≤O(1)εk(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2,|α|≤1. |
Outside the finite Mach number region,
|∂αxN|≤O(1)εk|∫t0∫Rn+e−ν1(t−τ)e−|x−y|(1+τ+|y2|)−nk2dydτ|≤O(1)εk(1+t+|x|2)−nk2,|α|≤1. |
Thus, we verify the ansatz and finish the proof of pointwise estimates of the solution.
The
(∫Rn+(1+t+|x|2)−n2pdx)1p=(∫Rn+(1+t)−n2p(1+|x|21+t)−n2pdx)1p=(1+t)−n2(1+t)n2p=(1+t)−n2(1−1p). |
Hence we finish the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Lemma 5.1. [10] In the finite Mach number region
|1(2π)n∫|ξ|≤ε0(iξ)αeiξ⋅xe−1κ|ξ|2tdξ|≤O(1)e−|x|2C(t+1)(1+t)n+|α|2+O(1)e−|x|+tC,|α|≥0. |
Lemma 5.2. [9] We have the follow estimate for
∫Rne−(x−y)2C(t+1)(1+t)n2+|α|2(1+|y|2)−rdy≤O(1)(1+t)−|α|2(e−x22C(t+1)(t+1)n2+(1+t+|x|2)−r). |
Lemma 5.3. [9] For
∫t0∫Rne−ν(t−τ)2Yn(x−y)(1+τ)−|α|2(1+τ+|y|2)nk2dydτ≤O(1)(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|)−nk/2, |
∫t0∫Rne−(x−y)2C(t−τ+1)(1+t)n2+|α|2(1+τ+|y|2)−nk2dydτ≤O(1)(1+t)−|α|2(1+t+|x|2)−n2. |
Lemma 5.4. [7] Suppose a function
|F[f](ξ)|≤E(1+|ξ|)n+1, for |Im(ξi)|≤δ, and i=1,2,⋯,n. |
Then, the function
|f(x)|≤Ee−δ|x|/C, |
for any positive constant
The authors would like to thank the referees very much for their valuable comments and suggestions which improve the presentation of papersignicantly.
[1] |
R. Metzler, J. Klafter, The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep., 339 (2000), 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3 doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3
![]() |
[2] |
Z. J. Fu, L. W. Yang, Q. Xi, C. S. Liu, A boundary collocation method for anomalous heat conduction analysis in functionally graded materials, Comput. Math. Appl., 88 (2021), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.023 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.023
![]() |
[3] |
M. Bilal, T. Gul, A. Mouldi, S. Mukhtar, W. Alghamdi, S. M. Bouzgarrou, et al., Melting heat transition in a spinning flow of silver-magnesium oxide/engine oil hybrid nanofluid using parametric estimation, J. Nanomater., 2022 (2022), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2891315 doi: 10.1155/2022/2891315
![]() |
[4] |
Q. Xi, Z. Fu, T. Rabczuk, D. Yin, A localized collocation scheme with fundamental solutions for long-time anomalous heat conduction analysis in functionally graded materials, Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran., 180 (2021), 121778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121778 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121778
![]() |
[5] |
Z. J. Fu, S. Reutskiy, H. G. Sun, J. Ma, M. A. Khan, A robust kernel-based solver for variable-order time fractional PDEs under 2D/3D irregular domains, Appl. Math. Lett., 94 (2019), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.02.025 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.02.025
![]() |
[6] |
J. A. T. Machado, A. M. Lopes, Analysis of natural and artificial phenomena using signal processing and fractional calculus, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 18 (2015), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2015-0029 doi: 10.1515/fca-2015-0029
![]() |
[7] |
Hahim, S. Bouzgarrou, S. Rehman, E. Sabi, Thermodynamic analysis of Powell-Eyring-blood hybrid nanofluid through vertical stretching sheet with interface slip and melting heat, Results Eng., 20 (2023), 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101644 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101644
![]() |
[8] |
S. Bouzgarrou, M. Akermi, S. Nasr, F. Aouaini, A. H. Khan, K. Slimi, et al., CO2 storage in porous media unsteady thermosolutal natural convection—Application in deep saline aquifer reservoirs, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 125 (2023), 103890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103890 doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103890
![]() |
[9] |
S. Bouzgarrou, H. S. Harzallah, K. Slimi, Unsteady double diffusive natural convection in porous media-application to CO2 storage in deep saline aquifer reservoirs, Energy Procedia, 36 (2013), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.088 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.088
![]() |
[10] |
M. F. H. Lima, J. A. T. Machado, M. Crisóstomo, Experimental signal analysis of robot impacts in a fractional calculus perspective, J. Adv. Comput. Intell., 11 (2007), 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2007.p1079 doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2007.p1079
![]() |
[11] |
S. Qin, F. Liu, I. Turner, V. Vegh, Q. Yu, Q. Yang, Multi-term time-fractional Bloch equations and application in magnetic resonance imaging, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 319 (2017), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.01.018
![]() |
[12] |
C. Liu, N. Farouk, H. Ayed, F. Aouaini, S. M. Bouzgarrou, A. Mouldi, et al., Simulation of MHD free convection inside a square enclosure filled porous foam, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 32 (2022), 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101901 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.101901
![]() |
[13] |
V. Srivastava, K. N. Rai, A multi-term fractional diffusion equation for oxygen delivery through a capillary to tissues, Math. Comput. Model., 51 (2010), 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.11.002
![]() |
[14] |
V. Daftardar-Gejji, S. Bhalekar, Boundary value problems for multi-term fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345 (2008), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.065 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.065
![]() |
[15] |
M. Stojanović, Numerical method for solving diffusion-wave phenomena, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 3121–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.12.010
![]() |
[16] |
H. Jiang, F. Liu, I. Turner, K. Burrage, Analytical solutions for the multi-term time-space Caputo-Riesz fractional advection-diffusion equations on a finite domain, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 389 (2012), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.12.055 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.12.055
![]() |
[17] |
Y. Liu, L. Zheng, X. Zhang, Unsteady MHD Couette flow of a generalized Oldroyd-B fluid with fractional derivative, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.11.021
![]() |
[18] |
J. Lin, S. Reutskiy, Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, J. Lu, The novel analytical-numerical method for multi-dimensional multi-term time-fractional equations with general boundary conditions, Mathematics-Basel, 11 (2023), 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040929 doi: 10.3390/math11040929
![]() |
[19] |
F. Liu, S. Shen, V. Anh, I. Turner, Analysis of a discrete non-Markovian random walk approximation for the time fractional diffusion equation, Anziam J., 46 (2004), C488–C504. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v46i0.973 doi: 10.21914/anziamj.v46i0.973
![]() |
[20] |
Y. Zhao, F. Wang, X. Hu, Z. Shi, Y. Tang, Anisotropic linear triangle finite element approximation for multi-term time-fractional mixed diffusion and diffusion-wave equations with variable coefficient on 2D bounded domain, Comput. Math. Appl., 78 (2019), 1705–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.11.028 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.11.028
![]() |
[21] |
Z. Liu, F. Liu, F. Zeng, An alternating direction implicit spectral method for solving two dimensional multi-term time fractional mixed diffusion and diffusion-wave equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 136 (2019), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2018.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2018.10.005
![]() |
[22] |
J. Shen, X. M. Gu, Two finite difference methods based on an H2N2 interpolation for two-dimensional time fractional mixed diffusion and diffusion-wave equations, Discrete Cont. Dyn-B., 27 (2022), 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2021086 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021086
![]() |
[23] |
O. P. Agrawal, Solution for a fractional diffusion-wave equation defined in a bounded domain, Nonlinear Dynam., 29 (2002), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016539022492 doi: 10.1023/A:1016539022492
![]() |
[24] |
C. Tadjeran, M. M. Meerschaert, H. P. Scheffler, A second-order accurate numerical approximation for the fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 213 (2006), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.008
![]() |
[25] |
Y. Liu, H. Sun, X. Yin, L. Feng, Fully discrete spectral method for solving a novel multi-term time-fractional mixed diffusion and diffusion-wave equation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 71 (2020), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-019-1244-6 doi: 10.1007/s00033-019-1244-6
![]() |
[26] |
A. Bhardwaj, A. Kumar, A numerical solution of time-fractional mixed diffusion and diffusion-wave equation by an RBF-based meshless method, Eng. Comput.-Germany, 38 (2022), 1883–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01134-4 doi: 10.1007/s00366-020-01134-4
![]() |
[27] |
F. Safari, W. Chen, Coupling of the improved singular boundary method and dual reciprocity method for multi-term time-fractional mixed diffusion-wave equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 78 (2019), 1594–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.02.001
![]() |
[28] |
H. Ye, F. Liu, I. Turner, V. Anh, K. Burrage, Series expansion solutions for the multi-term time and space fractional partial differential equations in two-and three-dimensions, Eur. Phys. J.-Spec. Top., 222 (2013), 1901–1914. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2013-01972-2 doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01972-2
![]() |
[29] |
Z. Li, O. Y. Imanuvilov, M. Yamamoto, Uniqueness in inverse boundary value problems for fractional diffusion equations, Inverse Probl., 32 (2015), 015004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/32/1/015004 doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/1/015004
![]() |
[30] |
S. S. Ezz-Eldien, E. H. Doha, Y. Wang, W. Cai, A numerical treatment of the two-dimensional multi-term time-fractional mixed sub-diffusion and diffusion-wave equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 91 (2020), 105445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105445 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105445
![]() |
[31] |
L. L. Sun, Y. S. Li, Y. Zhang, Simultaneous inversion of the potential term and the fractional orders in a multi-term time-fractional diffusion equation, Inverse Probl., 37 (2021), 055007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/abf162 doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/abf162
![]() |
[32] | B. Fornberg, A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. |
[33] | L. N. Trefethen, Spectral Methods in MATLAB, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719598 |
[34] |
P. Maraner, E. Onofri, G. P. Tecchioli, Spectral methods in computational quantum mechanics, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 37 (1991), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(91)90119-5 doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(91)90119-5
![]() |
[35] | C. Canuto, A. Quarteroni, M. Y. Hussaini, T. A. Zang, Spectral Methods: Evolution to Complex Geometries and Applications to Fluid Dynamics, Berlin: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30728-0 |
[36] | W. Bourke, Spectral methods in global climate and weather prediction models. In: M. E. Schlesinger, Physically-Based Modelling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change, Dordrecht: Springer, 243 (1988), 169–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3041-4_4 |
[37] |
R. L. McCrory, S. A. Orszag, Spectral methods for multi-dimensional diffusion problems, J. Comput. Phys., 37 (1980), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(80)90006-6 doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(80)90006-6
![]() |
[38] |
K. Z. Korczak, A. T. Patera, An isoparametric spectral element method for solution of the Navier-Stokes equations in complex geometry, J. Comput. Phys., 62 (1986), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(86)90134-8 doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90134-8
![]() |
[39] |
A. Bueno-Orovio, V. M. Perez-Garcia, F. H. Fenton, Spectral methods for partial differential equations in irregular domains: The spectral smoothed boundary method, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 28 (2006), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1137/040607575 doi: 10.1137/040607575
![]() |
[40] |
Z. J. Fu, W. Chen, H. T. Yang, Boundary particle method for Laplace transformed time fractional diffusion equations, J. Comput. Phys., 235 (2013), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.018
![]() |
[41] |
Kamran, R. Kamal, G. Rahmat, K. Shah, On the numerical approximation of three-dimensional time fractional convection-diffusion equations, Mathe. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 4640476. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4640467 doi: 10.1155/2021/4640467
![]() |
[42] |
Kamran, M. Irfan, F. M. Alotaibi, S. Haque, N. Mlaiki, K. Shah, RBF-based local meshless method for fractional diffusion equations, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020143 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7020143
![]() |
[43] |
L. Feng, F. Liu, I. Turner, Finite difference/finite element method for a novel 2D multi-term time-fractional mixed sub-diffusion and diffusion-wave equation on convex domains, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 70 (2019), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.10.016 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.10.016
![]() |
[44] | I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999. |
[45] |
R. Razzaq, U. Farooq, J. Cui, T. Muhammad, Non-similar solution for magnetized flow of Maxwell nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021 (2021), 5539542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5539542 doi: 10.1155/2021/5539542
![]() |
[46] |
X. M. Gu, S. L. Wu, A parallel-in-time iterative algorithm for Volterra partial integro-differential problems with weakly singular kernel, J. Comput. Phys., 417 (2020), 109576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109576 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109576
![]() |
[47] |
B. D. Welfert, Generation of pseudospectral differentiation matrices I, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 1640–1657. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142993295545 doi: 10.1137/S0036142993295545
![]() |
[48] |
A. Shokri, S. Mirzaei, A pseudo-spectral based method for time-fractional advection-diffusion equation, Comput. Methods Diffe., 8 (2020), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.22034/CMDE.2020.29307.1414 doi: 10.22034/CMDE.2020.29307.1414
![]() |
[49] |
R. Baltensperger, M. R. Trummer, Spectral differencing with a twist, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2003), 1465–1487. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827501388182 doi: 10.1137/S1064827501388182
![]() |
[50] |
S. Börm, L. Grasedyck, W. Hackbusch, Introduction to hierarchical matrices with applications, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 27 (2003), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-7997(02)00152-2 doi: 10.1016/S0955-7997(02)00152-2
![]() |
[51] |
B. Dingfelder, J. A. C. Weideman, An improved Talbot method for numerical Laplace transform inversion, Numer. Algorithms, 68 (2015), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-014-9895-z doi: 10.1007/s11075-014-9895-z
![]() |
[52] | H. Stehfest, Algorithm 368: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms [D5], Commun. ACM, 13 (1970), 47–49. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/361953.361969. |
[53] |
A. Talbot, The accurate numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, IMA J. Appl. Math., 23 (1979), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamat/23.1.97 doi: 10.1093/imamat/23.1.97
![]() |
[54] |
Kamran, U. Gul, F. M. Alotaibi, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, Computational approach for differential equations with local and nonlocal fractional-order differential operators, J. Math.-UK, 2023 (2023), 6542787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6542787 doi: 10.1155/2023/6542787
![]() |
[55] |
Kamran, S. Ahmad, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, B. Abdalla, On the approximation of fractal-fractional differential equations using numerical inverse laplace transform methods, CMES-Comp. Model. Eng., 135 (2023), 2743–2765. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.023705 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2023.023705
![]() |
[56] |
D. P. Gaver Jr, Observing stochastic processes, and approximate transform inversion, Oper. Res., 14 (1966), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.14.3.444 doi: 10.1287/opre.14.3.444
![]() |
[57] |
A. Kuznetsov, On the convergence of the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 51 (2013), 2984–2998. https://doi.org/10.1137/13091974X doi: 10.1137/13091974X
![]() |
[58] |
B. Davies, B. Martin, Numerical inversion of the Laplace transform: A survey and comparison of methods, J. Comput. Phys., 33 (1979), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90025-1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90025-1
![]() |
[59] |
J. Abate, W. Whitt, A unified framework for numerically inverting Laplace transforms, Informs J. Comput., 18 (2006), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0137 doi: 10.1287/ijoc.1050.0137
![]() |