Integrator or coincidence detector --- what shapes the relation of stimulus synchrony and the operational mode of a neuron?

  • Received: 01 March 2015 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 January 2016
  • MSC : 92B25, 92C20, 92-08.

  • The operational mode of a neuron (i.e., whether a neuron is an integrator or a coincidence detector) is in part determined by the degree of synchrony in the firing of its pre-synaptic neural population. More specifically, it is determined by the degree of synchrony that causes the neuron to fire. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the input and the operational mode. We compare the response-relevant input synchrony, which measures the operational mode and can be determined using a membrane potential slope-based measure [7], with the spike time distance of the spike trains driving the neuron, which measures spike train synchrony and can be determined using the multivariate SPIKE-distance metric [10]. We discover that the relationship between the two measures changes substantially based on the values of the parameters of the input (firing rate and number of spike trains) and the parameters of the post-synaptic neuron (synaptic weight, membrane leak time constant and spike threshold). More importantly, we determine how the parameters interact to shape the synchrony-operational mode relationship. Our results indicate that the amount of depolarisation caused by a highly synchronous volley of input spikes, is the most influential factor in defining the relationship between input synchrony and operational mode. This is defined by the number of input spikes and the membrane potential depolarisation caused per spike, compared to the spike threshold.

    Citation: Achilleas Koutsou, Jacob Kanev, Maria Economidou, Chris Christodoulou. Integrator or coincidence detector --- what shapes the relation of stimulus synchrony and the operational mode of a neuron?[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(3): 521-535. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Robert Carlson . Myopic models of population dynamics on infinite networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2014, 9(3): 477-499. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.477
    [2] Juan Manuel Pastor, Javier García-Algarra, Javier Galeano, José María Iriondo, José J. Ramasco . A simple and bounded model of population dynamics for mutualistic networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(1): 53-70. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.53
    [3] Riccardo Bonetto, Hildeberto Jardón Kojakhmetov . Nonlinear diffusion on networks: Perturbations and consensus dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(3): 1344-1380. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024058
    [4] Claudio Canuto, Anna Cattani . The derivation of continuum limits of neuronal networks with gap-junction couplings. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2014, 9(1): 111-133. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.111
    [5] Elisabeth Logak, Isabelle Passat . An epidemic model with nonlocal diffusion on networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(4): 693-719. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016014
    [6] Narcisa Apreutesei, Vitaly Volpert . Reaction-diffusion waves with nonlinear boundary conditions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8(1): 23-35. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.23
    [7] Juan Manuel Pastor, Javier García-Algarra, José M. Iriondo, José J. Ramasco, Javier Galeano . Dragging in mutualistic networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(1): 37-52. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.37
    [8] Pedro Aceves-Sanchez, Benjamin Aymard, Diane Peurichard, Pol Kennel, Anne Lorsignol, Franck Plouraboué, Louis Casteilla, Pierre Degond . A new model for the emergence of blood capillary networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(1): 91-138. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021001
    [9] Mirela Domijan, Markus Kirkilionis . Graph theory and qualitative analysis of reaction networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3(2): 295-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.295
    [10] Luca Di Persio, Giacomo Ziglio . Gaussian estimates on networks with applications to optimal control. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6(2): 279-296. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.279
  • The operational mode of a neuron (i.e., whether a neuron is an integrator or a coincidence detector) is in part determined by the degree of synchrony in the firing of its pre-synaptic neural population. More specifically, it is determined by the degree of synchrony that causes the neuron to fire. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the input and the operational mode. We compare the response-relevant input synchrony, which measures the operational mode and can be determined using a membrane potential slope-based measure [7], with the spike time distance of the spike trains driving the neuron, which measures spike train synchrony and can be determined using the multivariate SPIKE-distance metric [10]. We discover that the relationship between the two measures changes substantially based on the values of the parameters of the input (firing rate and number of spike trains) and the parameters of the post-synaptic neuron (synaptic weight, membrane leak time constant and spike threshold). More importantly, we determine how the parameters interact to shape the synchrony-operational mode relationship. Our results indicate that the amount of depolarisation caused by a highly synchronous volley of input spikes, is the most influential factor in defining the relationship between input synchrony and operational mode. This is defined by the number of input spikes and the membrane potential depolarisation caused per spike, compared to the spike threshold.


    [1] Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 18 (1982), 83-92.
    [2] Journal of Physiology Paris, 90 (1996), 243-247.
    [3] Neural Computation, 9 (1997), 985-1000.
    [4] Verlag von Veit & Comp., Leipzig, 1914.
    [5] Neural Computation, 11 (1999), 1139-1154.
    [6] Trends in Neurosciences, 19 (1996), 130-137.
    [7] Neural Computation, 24 (2012), 2318-2345.
    [8] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 183 (2009), 287-299.
    [9] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 195 (2011), 92-106.
    [10] Journal of Neurophysiology, 109 (2013), 1457-1472.
    [11] Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165 (2007), 151-161.
    [12] Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse, 7 (1905), 265-315.
    [13] Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 8 (2014), 452.
    [14] Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 14 (2003), 239-251.
    [15] Neural Computation, 26 (2014), 306-348.
    [16] Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4 (1994), 569-579.
    [17] Journal of Neuroscience, 18 (1998), 3870-3896.
    [18] Neural Computation, 4 (1992), 643-646.
    [19] Journal of Neuroscience, 13 (1993), 334-350.
    [20] Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15 (2005), 585-592.
    [21] Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 8 (1997), 127-164.
    [22] in Analysis of Parallel Spike Trains (eds. S. Grün and S. Rotter), Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience, 7, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2010, 129-156.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zlatinka Dimitrova, Flows of Substances in Networks and Network Channels: Selected Results and Applications, 2022, 24, 1099-4300, 1485, 10.3390/e24101485
    2. Agelos Georgakopoulos, Sebastian Haeseler, Matthias Keller, Daniel Lenz, Radosław K. Wojciechowski, Graphs of finite measure, 2015, 103, 00217824, 1093, 10.1016/j.matpur.2014.10.006
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3250) PDF downloads(735) Cited by(2)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog