An improved adaptive type-Ⅱ progressive censoring (IAT-Ⅱ PC) scheme has been introduced to effectively control the duration of life-testing experiments within a prespecified limit. While this scheme has attracted considerable attention, statistical inference under random removals, in which the number of removals at each failure time is treated as a random variable, remains largely unexplored in the literature. In this paper, we focus on statistical inference for the two-parameter Weibull distribution based on the IAT-Ⅱ PC scheme, where the number of removals at each failure time follows a binomial distribution. Point and interval estimation of the Weibull parameters was carried out using the maximum likelihood (ML), maximum product spacing (MPS), and Bayesian estimation methods. Asymptotic confidence intervals for the model parameters were constructed based on the asymptotic normality of the ML and MPS estimators. Since the posterior distributions are analytically intractable, Bayesian estimates and their corresponding credible intervals were obtained using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. The performance of the proposed estimators was evaluated through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. In addition, a real-world dataset was analyzed to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed inference methods. The results show that the Bayesian estimators yield more accurate point and interval estimates than their classical counterparts under the IAT-Ⅱ PC scheme with binomial removals.
Citation: Hanefi Geze, İlhan Usta. Statistical inference for the Weibull distribution under improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring with binomial removals[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(8): 27231-27263. doi: 10.3934/math.20261090
An improved adaptive type-Ⅱ progressive censoring (IAT-Ⅱ PC) scheme has been introduced to effectively control the duration of life-testing experiments within a prespecified limit. While this scheme has attracted considerable attention, statistical inference under random removals, in which the number of removals at each failure time is treated as a random variable, remains largely unexplored in the literature. In this paper, we focus on statistical inference for the two-parameter Weibull distribution based on the IAT-Ⅱ PC scheme, where the number of removals at each failure time follows a binomial distribution. Point and interval estimation of the Weibull parameters was carried out using the maximum likelihood (ML), maximum product spacing (MPS), and Bayesian estimation methods. Asymptotic confidence intervals for the model parameters were constructed based on the asymptotic normality of the ML and MPS estimators. Since the posterior distributions are analytically intractable, Bayesian estimates and their corresponding credible intervals were obtained using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. The performance of the proposed estimators was evaluated through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. In addition, a real-world dataset was analyzed to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed inference methods. The results show that the Bayesian estimators yield more accurate point and interval estimates than their classical counterparts under the IAT-Ⅱ PC scheme with binomial removals.
| [1] |
A. C. Cohen, Progressively censored samples in life testing, Technometrics, 5 (1963), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1963.10490102 doi: 10.1080/00401706.1963.10490102
|
| [2] |
H. K. T. Ng, D. Kundu, P. S. Chan, Statistical analysis of exponential lifetimes under an adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring scheme, Nav. Res. Log., 56 (2009), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20371 doi: 10.1002/nav.20371
|
| [3] |
W. Yan, P. Li, Y. Yu, Statistical inference for the reliability of Burr-XII distribution under improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring, Appl. Math. Model., 95 (2021), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.01.050 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.01.050
|
| [4] |
S. Dutta, S. Kayal, Inference of a competing risks model with partially observed failure causes under improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring, Proc. I. Mech. Eng. Part, 237 (2023), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x221104555 doi: 10.1177/1748006x221104555
|
| [5] |
L. Zhang, R. Yan, Parameter estimation of Chen distribution under improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 94 (2024), 2830–2861. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2024.2358828 doi: 10.1080/00949655.2024.2358828
|
| [6] |
M. Nassar, A. Elshahhat, Estimation procedures and optimal censoring schemes for an improved adaptive progressively Type-Ⅱ censored Weibull distribution, J. Appl. Stat., 51 (2024), 1664–1688. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2023.2230536 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2023.2230536
|
| [7] |
M. Nassar, R. Alotaibi, A. Elshahhat, Reliability analysis at usual operating settings for Weibull constant-stress model with improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressively censored samples, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 16931–16965. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024823 doi: 10.3934/math.2024823
|
| [8] |
S. Dutta, H. N. Alqifari, A. Almohaimeed, Bayesian and non-Bayesian inference for logistic-exponential distribution using improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressively censored data, PLoS ONE, 19 (2024), e0298638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298638 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298638
|
| [9] |
M. Irfan, S. Dutta, A. K. Sharma, Statistical inference and optimal plans for improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censored data following Kumaraswamy-G family of distributions, Phys. Scripta, 100 (2025), 025213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ada216 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ada216
|
| [10] |
R. Alotaibi, M. Nassar, A. Elshahhat, Reliability analysis of independent Burr-X competing risks model based on improved adaptive progressively Type-Ⅱ censored samples with applications, AIMS Math., 10 (2025), 15302–15332. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025686 doi: 10.3934/math.2025686
|
| [11] |
S. A. Lone, On estimation of Burr Type Ⅲ model using improved adaptive progressive censoring with application to engineering data, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 42 (2026), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.70072 doi: 10.1002/qre.70072
|
| [12] |
H. K. Yuen, S. K. Tse, Parameter estimation for Weibull distributed lifetimes under progressive censoring with random removals, J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 55 (1996), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659608811749 doi: 10.1080/00949659608811749
|
| [13] |
S. K. Tse, C. Yang, H. Yuen, Statistical analysis of Weibull distributed lifetime data under Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring with binomial removals, J. Appl. Stat., 27 (2000), 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760050173355 doi: 10.1080/02664760050173355
|
| [14] |
S. K. Singh, U. Singh, V. K. Sharma, Expected total test time and Bayesian estimation for generalized Lindley distribution under progressively Type-Ⅱ censored sample where removals follow beta-binomial removals, Appl. Math. Comput., 222 (2013), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.07.058 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.07.058
|
| [15] |
S. J. Wu, Y. J. Chen, C. T. Chang, Statistical inference based on progressively censored samples with random removals from the Burr Type XII distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 77 (2007), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360600569204 doi: 10.1080/10629360600569204
|
| [16] | I. Usta, H. Gezer, Parameter estimation in Weibull distribution on progressively Type-Ⅱ censored samples with beta-binomial removals, Economy Business, 10 (2016), 505–515. |
| [17] |
T. A. Abushal, A. H. Abdel-Hamid, Inference on a new distribution under progressive-stress accelerated life tests and progressive Type-Ⅱ censoring based on a series-parallel system, AIMS Math., 7 (2021), 425–454. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022028 doi: 10.3934/math.2022028
|
| [18] |
H. Gezer, I. Usta, Parameter and reliability estimation for the Rayleigh distribution under improved adaptive Type-Ⅱ progressive censoring scheme with binomial removals, Cumhuriyet Sci. J., 47 (2026), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1728252 doi: 10.17776/csj.1728252
|
| [19] | J. F. Lawless, Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 2 Eds., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118033005 |
| [20] | H. Rinne, The Weibull distribution: A Handbook, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420087444 |
| [21] | N. Balakrishnan, R. Aggarwala, Progressive censoring: Theory, methods, and applications, Boston: Birkhäuser, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1334-5 |
| [22] |
A. S. Hassan, N. Alsadat, O. S. Balogun, B. A. Helmy, Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation of some entropy measures for a Weibull distribution, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 32646–32673. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241563 doi: 10.3934/math.20241563
|
| [23] |
M. Nassar, R. Alotaibi, A new block censoring scheme: comparative assessment of likelihood and spacings methods for Weibull distribution with an application to cancer data, AIMS Math., 11 (2026), 6834–6865. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2026282 doi: 10.3934/math.2026282
|
| [24] |
R. C. H. Cheng, N. A. K. Amin, Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 45 (1983), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01268.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01268.x
|
| [25] | B. Ranneby, The maximum spacing method: An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method, Scand. J. Stat., 11 (1984), 93–112. |
| [26] |
R. C. H. Cheng, T. C. Iles, Corrected maximum likelihood in non-regular problems, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 49 (1987), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1987.tb01430.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1987.tb01430.x
|
| [27] |
S. Anatolyev, G. Kosenok, An alternative to maximum likelihood based on spacings, Economet. Theor., 21 (2005), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466605050255 doi: 10.1017/s0266466605050255
|
| [28] |
D. Kundu, Bayesian inference and life testing plan for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring, Technometrics, 50 (2008), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017008000000217 doi: 10.1198/004017008000000217
|
| [29] | C. P. Robert, G. Casella, Monte Carlo statistical methods, 2 Eds., New York: Springer, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2 |
| [30] | A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, D. B. Rubin, Bayesian data analysis, 3 Eds., Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018 |
| [31] | E. L. Lehmann, G. Casella, Theory of point estimation, 2 Eds., New York: Springer, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98854 |
| [32] |
M. H. Chen, Q. M. Shao, Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 8 (1999), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1999.10474802 doi: 10.1080/10618600.1999.10474802
|
| [33] |
N. Balakrishnan, R. Sandhu, A simple simulation algorithm for generating progressively Type-Ⅱ censored samples, Am. Stat., 49 (1995), 229–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476150 doi: 10.1080/00031305.1995.10476150
|
| [34] |
I. Usta, Different estimation methods for the parameters of the extended Burr XII distribution, J. Appl. Stat., 40 (2013), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.743974 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2012.743974
|
| [35] |
Y. M. Kantar, B. Şenoğlu, A comparative study for the location and scale parameters of the Weibull distribution with a given shape parameter, Comput. Geosci., 34 (2008), 1900–1909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.004
|
| [36] |
A. Henningsen, O. Toomet, MaxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R, Comput. Stat., 26 (2011), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-010-0217-1 doi: 10.1007/s00180-010-0217-1
|
| [37] | M. Plummer, N. Best, K. Cowles, K. Vines, CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC, R News, 6 (2006), 7–11. |
| [38] |
W. J. Padgett, J. D. Spurrier, Shewhart-type charts for percentiles of strength distributions, J. Qual. Technol., 22 (1990), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1990.11979260 doi: 10.1080/00224065.1990.11979260
|
| [39] |
H. M. Okasha, H. S. Mohammed, Y. Lio, E-Bayesian estimation of reliability characteristics of a Weibull distribution with applications, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111261 doi: 10.3390/math9111261
|