Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/SuppMathOperators.js
Research article

Regularity of extended conjugate graphs of finite groups

  • Received: 27 September 2021 Revised: 31 December 2021 Accepted: 04 January 2022 Published: 07 January 2022
  • MSC : Primary 20E45; Secondary 05C25, 20D99

  • The extended conjugate graph associated to a finite group G is defined as an undirected graph with vertex set G such that two distinct vertices joined by an edge if they are conjugate. In this article, we show that several properties of finite groups can be expressed in terms of properties of their extended conjugate graphs. In particular, we show that there is a strong connection between a graph-theoretic property, namely regularity, and an algebraic property, namely nilpotency. We then give some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be regular. Finally, we study extended conjugate graphs associated to groups of order pq, p3, and p4, where p and q are distinct primes.

    Citation: Piyapat Dangpat, Teerapong Suksumran. Regularity of extended conjugate graphs of finite groups[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5480-5498. doi: 10.3934/math.2022304

    Related Papers:

    [1] Tariq A. Alraqad, Hicham Saber . On the structure of finite groups associated to regular non-centralizer graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30981-30991. doi: 10.3934/math.20231585
    [2] Tao Cheng, Junchao Mao . A new class of directed strongly regular Cayley graphs over dicyclic groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24184-24192. doi: 10.3934/math.20241176
    [3] Jiangmin Pan, Yingnan Zhang . On cubic semisymmetric bi-Cayley graphs on nonabelian simple groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12689-12701. doi: 10.3934/math.2022702
    [4] Huani Li, Ruiqin Fu, Xuanlong Ma . Forbidden subgraphs in reduced power graphs of finite groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5410-5420. doi: 10.3934/math.2021319
    [5] Chunqiang Cui, Jin Chen, Shixun Lin . Metric and strong metric dimension in TI-power graphs of finite groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 705-720. doi: 10.3934/math.2025032
    [6] Fawaz Aseeri, Julian Kaspczyk . The conjugacy diameters of non-abelian finite p-groups with cyclic maximal subgroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10734-10755. doi: 10.3934/math.2024524
    [7] Huadong Su, Ling Zhu . Thickness of the subgroup intersection graph of a finite group. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2590-2606. doi: 10.3934/math.2021157
    [8] Jean-Guy Caputo, Imene Khames, Arnaud Knippel . Nonlinear normal modes in a network with cubic couplings. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20565-20578. doi: 10.3934/math.20221127
    [9] Nuttawoot Nupo, Sayan Panma . Certain structural properties for Cayley regularity graphs of semigroups and their theoretical applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16228-16239. doi: 10.3934/math.2023830
    [10] Bilal A. Rather, Fawad Ali, Nasim Ullah, Al-Sharef Mohammad, Anwarud Din, Sehra . Aα matrix of commuting graphs of non-abelian groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15436-15452. doi: 10.3934/math.2022845
  • The extended conjugate graph associated to a finite group G is defined as an undirected graph with vertex set G such that two distinct vertices joined by an edge if they are conjugate. In this article, we show that several properties of finite groups can be expressed in terms of properties of their extended conjugate graphs. In particular, we show that there is a strong connection between a graph-theoretic property, namely regularity, and an algebraic property, namely nilpotency. We then give some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be regular. Finally, we study extended conjugate graphs associated to groups of order pq, p3, and p4, where p and q are distinct primes.



    It is evidenced in the literature that one can use conjugacy classes to investigate structures of finite groups, see [1,2,3,4,5,6,8,11,12,14], to name a few. In fact, the number of distinct conjugacy classes of a finite group is an important numerical property; it is indeed the number of non-equivalent irreducible representations of that group over the complex numbers. Among other things, the class equation,

    |G|=|Z(G)|+ni=1[G:CG(gi)], (1.1)

    where g1,g2,,gn are representatives of the distinct conjugacy classes of G not contained in the center Z(G), is a fundamental tool in studying structures of finite groups and has several applications in mathematics. In [1], the authors use the equivalence relation on a finite group G defined by xy if and only if |K(x)|=|K(y)| for all x,yG to study the structure of G, where K(g) denotes the conjugacy class of g. The set of sizes of equivalence classes with respect to this relation is called the same-size conjugate set of G, denoted by U(G). In this article, we focus on the study of finite groups G with |U(G)|=2 from a graph-theoretic point of view.

    In [10], the authors introduce the notion of a conjugate graph associated to a finite non-abelian group. If G is a finite non-abelian group, the conjugate graph of G, denoted by ΓcG, is defined as an undirected graph with vertex set GZ(G) such that two distinct vertices joined by an edge if they are conjugate. They show that several properties of finite groups can be studied via their conjugate graphs. In fact, they prove that if G is a finite group such that ΓcGΓcS, then SG, where S is a finite non-abelian simple group that satisfies Thompson's conjecture. It turns out that several algebraic properties of finite groups can be expressed via their conjugate graphs with isolated vertices of their centers. Therefore, we extend this definition in a natural way by introducing the notion of an extended conjugate graph. In this work, we show that several properties of finite groups are reflected in their extended conjugate graphs and vice versa. We also show that there is a nice relation between a graph-theoretic property, namely regularity, and an algebraic property, namely nilpotency. We then find out some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be regular. A few concrete examples that illustrate our results are given as well.

    In this section, we collect preliminary results in group theory and graph theory for reference. For basic knowledge of abstract algebra and graph theory, we refer the reader to [9] and [17], respectively. The list of symbols used throughout this article is given at the end of the article.

    Recall that the center of a group G is defined by Z(G)={zG:zg=gz for all gG}. The centralizer of an element gG is defined by CG(g)={xG:xgx1=g}. For all a,bG, define acb if and only if b=hah1 for some hG. Then c is an equivalence relation on G. The equivalence class of gG is called the conjugacy class of g, which is given by K(g)={xgx1:xG}.

    Theorem 2.1. Let G1,G2,,Gn be groups. For any element (g1,g2,,gn)ni=1Gi,

    K((g1,g2,,gn))=K(g1)×K(g2)××K(gn).

    Proof. This is a standard result in abstract algebra.

    Given a finite group G, define R(G) to be the probability that a pair of elements, chosen at random in G, will commute with each other (cf. p. 200, [15]), that is,

    R(G)=|{(g,h)G×G:gh=hg}||G|2. (2.1)

    The number R(G) will be referred to as the probability of commutativity in G.

    Theorem 2.2. (Theorem 1, [15])If G is a finite group with n conjugacy classes, then

    R(G)=n|G|. (2.2)

    Let G be a finite group. Let n1,n2,,nr, where n1>n2>>nr=1, be all the numbers each of which is the size of the conjugacy class of some element of G. The vector (n1,n2,,nr) is called the conjugate type vector of G. A group G with the conjugate type vector (n1,n2,,nr) is called a group of conjugate type (n1,n2,,nr), see p. 17 of [14].

    Theorem 2.3. (Theorem 1, [14])Any group of conjugate type (n1,1) is nilpotent.

    Recall that an undirected simple graph is regular if every its vertex has the same degree. A graph isomorphism is a bijection between the vertex sets of two graphs that preserves adjacency. A graph isomorphism from a graph Γ to itself is called a graph automorphism. A graph Γ is vertex-transitive if for each pair of two vertices u and v in Γ, there exists a graph automorphism ϕ of Γ such that ϕ(u)=v.

    Theorem 2.4. (p. 221, [7])Every complete graph is vertex-transitive.

    Theorem 2.5. (Proposition 3.1, [16])A graph is vertex-transitive if and only if its components are all vertex-transitive and are pairwise isomorphic.

    In this section, we introduce the definition of an extended conjugate graph associated to a finite group and investigate properties of finite groups via their extended conjugate graphs. In Section 3.1, we indicate that several properties of finite groups are reflected in their extended conjugate graphs and vice versa. In particular, we show that the probability of commutativity in a finite group can be expressed in terms of its extended conjugate graph and give a graph-theoretic proof of the well-known class equation for finite groups. In Section 3.2, we show that there is a remarkable connection between a graph-theoretic property, namely regularity, and an algebraic property, namely nilpotency. We then find out some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be regular. In Section 3.3, we explore extended conjugate graphs associated to groups of order pq, p3, and p4, where p and q are distinct primes. We show that a non-abelian group of order p3 always has a regular conjugate graph and that a non-abelian group of order p4 may have a regular or non-regular conjugate graph. We also find their clique and domination numbers.

    Let G be a finite non-abelian group. In [10], the authors define the conjugate graph of G, denoted by ΓcG, to be an undirected graph with the vertex set GZ(G) such that two distinct vertices joined by an edge if they are conjugate. It turns out that several algebraic properties of finite groups can be expressed via their conjugate graphs that add isolated vertices of their centers. Therefore, we extend this definition as follows.

    Definition 3.1. (Extended conjugate graphs) Let G be a finite group. The extended conjugate graph of G, denoted by ΓeG, is defined as an undirected graph with the vertex set G and the edge set E={{u,v}:u,vG,uv,v=gug1 for some gG}.

    By definition, it is clear that if G is a finite non-abelian group, then the extended conjugate graph of G is the union of the conjugate graph of G and the isolated vertices corresponding to the elements of Z(G). In other words, the conjugate graph of G is simply the subgraph of ΓeG induced by GZ(G), that is, ΓcG=ΓeG[GZ(G)]. As is well known, zZ(G) if and only if K(z)={z}. Hence, a finite group G is abelian if and only if its extended conjugate graph is the empty graph with |Z(G)| vertices. Therefore, it seems reasonable to study the extended conjugate graph of a finite non-abelian group.

    Proposition 3.2. Let G and H be finite groups. If G and H are isomorphic as groups, then ΓeG and ΓeH are isomorphic as graphs.

    Proof. It is not difficult to check that if φ:GH is a group isomorphism, then φ is a graph isomorphism from ΓeG to ΓeH as well.

    Proposition 3.2 indicates that construction of an extended conjugate graph is an invariant of groups: groups that are isomorphic have extended conjugate graphs that are isomorphic. We remark that the converse to Proposition 3.2 is not true; a counterexample will be exhibited in Section 3.3.2.

    Let G be a finite group. As usual, the extended conjugate graph of G induces an equivalence relation p on G: upv if and only if either u=v or there is a path from u to v in ΓeG. Therefore, Ξ is a component of ΓeG if and only if there is an equivalence class C determined by p such that Ξ is the subgraph of ΓeG induced by C, that is, Ξ=ΓeG[C]. Note that upv if and only if u and v are in the same component of ΓeG.

    Lemma 3.3. Let G be a finite group. For all u,vG, u and v are conjugate if and only if upv.

    Proof. The direct implication is clear. To prove the reverse implication, suppose that uv and that there is a path from u to v, say u=u0,u1,,un=v. By definition, there are elements g1,g2,,gnG such that u1=g1u0g11, u2=g2u1g12,, and un=gnun1g1n. Hence, v=(gngn1g1)u(gngn1g1)1.

    Lemma 3.4. Let G be a finite group. Then Ξ is a component of ΓeG if and only if Ξ=ΓeG[C] for some conjugacy class C of G.

    Proof. The lemma follows from Lemma 3.3.

    In view of Lemma 3.4, there is a strong relationship between the components of the extended conjugate graph and the conjugacy classes of a finite group. In particular, we have the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.5. Let G be a finite group. Then the number of components of the extended conjugate graph of G equals the number of conjugacy classes of G.

    Proof. The theorem follows from Lemma 3.4.

    Corollary 3.6. If G is a finite group, then the number of components of the extended conjugate graph of G equals 1|G|gG|CG(g)|.

    Proof. It is a standard result in abstract algebra that the number of conjugacy classes of G is 1|G|gG|CG(g)|.

    Recall that R(G) is the probability that a pair of elements of a finite group G, chosen at random in G, will commute with each other. One nice result shows that R(G)58 for all finite non-abelian groups G and equality holds if and only if |G/Z(G)|=4; see, for instance, Theorem 2 of [15]. As a consequence of Theorem 3.5, we obtain a formula that relates a numerical property of finite groups to a graph-theoretic property of their extended conjugate graphs.

    Theorem 3.7. If G is a finite group, then

    R(G)=thenumberofcomponentsofΓeGthenumberofverticesofΓeG. (3.1)

    Proof. The theorem follows from Theorems 2.2 and 3.5.

    As an immediate consequence of Theorem 3.7, we obtain an upper bound for the number of components of the extended conjugate graph of a finite group G in terms of the order of G.

    Corollary 3.8. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. Then the number of components of ΓeG is less than or equal to 58|G| and equality holds if and only if |G/Z(G)|=4.

    Proof. The corollary follows from Theorem 2 of [15] and Theorem 3.7.

    The next theorem gives an upper bound for the number of components of the extended conjugate graph of a finite group G in terms of the least prime that divides the order of G.

    Theorem 3.9. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If p is the least prime dividing |G|, then the number of components of ΓeG is less than or equal to p2+p1p3|G|. Furthermore, equality holds if and only if |G/Z(G)|=p2.

    Proof. By Theorem 3 of [15], R(G)p2+p1p3. By Theorem 3.7, the number of components of ΓeG is R(G)|G|. Hence, the number of components of ΓeG is less than or equal to p2+p1p3|G|. By Theorem 3 of [15], R(G)=p2+p1p3 if and only if |G/Z(G)|=p2, which completes the proof.

    Recall a useful formula in the theory of finite groups: if G is a finite group, then |G|=|K(g)||CG(g)| for all gG; see, for instance, Proposition 6 in p. 123 of [9]. We express this result via the notion of an extended conjugate graph, as shown in the following proposition.

    Proposition 3.10. Let G be a finite group and let gG. If Ξ is a component of ΓeG containing vertex g, then V(Ξ)=K(g) and |V(Ξ)|=[G:CG(g)].

    Proof. By Lemma 3.4, Ξ=ΓeG[C], where C is a conjugacy class of G. Since gV(Ξ), we have gC and so C=K(g). Hence, V(Ξ)=C=K(g). As mentioned above, |V(Ξ)|=|K(g)|=|G||CG(g)|=[G:CG(g)].

    It is remarkable that Proposition 3.10 can be utilized to give a graph-theoretic proof of the class equation as follows. Let G be a finite group and consider the extended conjugate graph of G. Suppose that Θ1,Θ2,,Θm,Ξ1,Ξ2,,Ξn are the distinct components of ΓeG, where Θi has one vertex and Ξj has at least two vertices for all i=1,2,,m,j=1,2,,n. Thus, m=|Z(G)|. Let gj be a vertex in Ξj for all j=1,2,,n. Then, by counting the number of vertices of ΓeG,

    |G|=|V(ΓeG)|=|V(Θ1)|+|V(Θ2)|++|V(Θm)|+|V(Ξ1)|+|V(Ξ2)|++|V(Ξn)|=m+[G:CG(g1)]+[G:CG(g2)]++[G:CG(gn)]=|Z(G)|+nj=1[G:CG(gj)].

    We clarify the structure of extended conjugate graphs in the following proposition. In fact, the extended conjugate graph of any finite group is a union of complete graphs.

    Proposition 3.11. Let G be a finite group. If Ξ is a component of ΓeG, then Ξ is a complete graph.

    Proof. Let a,bV(Ξ) with ab. By Lemma 3.4, Ξ=ΓeG[C] for some conjugacy class C of G. Hence, a and b are conjugate and so there is an edge between a and b.

    Recall that a subset C of vertices of a graph Γ is called a clique if the induced subgraph Γ[C] is a complete graph. The maximum cardinality of a clique is called the clique number of Γ, denoted by ω(Γ). In light of Proposition 3.11, if g and h are not in the same conjugacy class of a finite group G, then any subset of G that contains both g and h is never a clique. In fact, C is a clique if and only if CK(g) for some gG. Therefore, by Propositions 3.10 and 3.11, if G is a finite group, then the clique number of the extended conjugate graph of G is given by

    ω(ΓeG)=max{|K(g)|:gG}. (3.2)

    The next proposition gives an upper bound for the clique number of the extended conjugate graph of a finite group G in terms of the order of the quotient group G/Z(G).

    Proposition 3.12. For any finite group G, the clique number of the extended conjugate graph of G is less than or equal to the order of G/Z(G), that is, ω(ΓeG)|G/Z(G)|.

    Proof. Let gG. Since Z(G)CG(g), it follows that |Z(G)||CG(g)|. Thus,

    |K(g)|=|G||CG(g)||G||Z(G)|=|G/Z(G)|.

    Since g is arbitrary, ω(ΓeG)|G/Z(G)|, as required.

    Recall that a dominating set for a graph Γ is a subset D of V(Γ) such that every vertex not in D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is defined as the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of Γ. By Proposition 3.11, every component of an extended conjugate graph is a complete graph. Hence, we obtain the following proposition immediately.

    Proposition 3.13. For any finite group G, the domination number of the extended conjugate graph of G equals the number of the components of the extended conjugate graph of G.

    We close this section with the relationship that relates the domination numbers of a finite group G, its normal subgroup N, and its quotient group G/N.

    Theorem 3.14. Let G be a finite group and let N be a normal subgroup of G. Then

    γ(ΓeG)γ(ΓeG/N)γ(ΓeN). (3.3)

    Proof. As proved in [11], k(G)k(G/N)k(N). Hence, γ(ΓeG)γ(ΓeG/N)γ(ΓeN) because k(H)=γ(ΓeH) for any finite group H by Theorem 3.5 and Proposition 3.13.

    Observe that if G is a finite non-abelian group, then there are at least two conjugacy classes of G such that one is the singleton {e} and the other has at least two elements. This implies that the whole extended conjugate graph of G is never regular. Moreover, it is never vertex-transitive by Theorem 2.5. Therefore, it makes sense to restrict attention to regularity and vertex-transitivity of the induced subgraph of ΓeG by GZ(G). Throughout the remainder of this article, by the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G we mean the induced subgraph ΓeG[GZ(G)], which coincides with the conjugate graph of G. In this section, we focus on sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to regular.

    Theorem 3.15. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. Then the following statements are equivalent:

    (i) the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is a union of Km's;

    (ii) the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular;

    (iii) the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is vertex-transitive.

    Proof. That (i) implies (ii) is trivial. Suppose that the non-central part of ΓeG is regular. Let Ξ1 and Ξ2 be two components of the non-central part of ΓeG. Pick uV(Ξ1) and vV(Ξ2). By Proposition 3.11, Ξ1 and Ξ2 are complete graphs. Hence, degu=|V(Ξ1)|1 and degv=|V(Ξ2)|1. By assumption, degu=degv and so |V(Ξ1)|=|V(Ξ2)|. By Theorems 2.4 and 2.5, the non-central part of ΓeG is vertex-transitive. This proves that (ii) implies (iii). Suppose that the non-central part of ΓeG is vertex-transitive and assume that it is the union of Km1,Km2,,Kmr. By Theorem 2.5, Kmi and Kmj must be isomorphic for all i,j and so mi=|V(Kmi)|=|V(Kmj)|=mj for all i,j. This proves that (iii) implies (i).

    In [14], Itô investigates the structure of finite groups of conjugate type (n1,1) from an algebraic point of view. By definition, if G is a finite group of conjugate type (n1,1), then G is non-abelian and every conjugacy class not in the center of G has the same size n1. Hence, the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular. This allows us to formulate a graph-theoretic version of Itô's result as follows.

    Theorem 3.16. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular, then G is nilpotent.

    Proof. By Theorem 3.15, the non-central part of ΓeG is a union of Km's. This implies that all conjugacy classes not contained in Z(G) have the same size m and so G is of conjugate type (m,1). By Itô's result (see Theorem 2.3), G is nilpotent.

    We remark that the converse to Theorem 3.16 is not true. The dihedral group D16 is nilpotent since it is a 2-group. However, the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of D16 is not regular. In fact, it consists precisely of three copies of K2 and two copies of K4, see Figure 1. As a consequence of Theorem 3.16, we obtain a simple condition to confirm the non-regularity of the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph.

    Figure 1.  Graphical presentation of ΓeD16.

    Theorem 3.17. If G is a non-trivial finite group having a trivial center, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is not regular.

    Proof. Suppose that G{e} and that Z(G)={e}. Then the upper central series of G never reaches G and so G is not nilpotent. By Theorem 3.16, the non-central part of ΓeG is not regular.

    As an application of Theorem 3.17, the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of the following group is not regular:

    (1) the symmetric group Sn for all n3;

    (2) the dihedral group D2n for all odd integers n3;

    (3) any non-abelian finite simple group;

    (4) any Frobenius group,

    because its center is trivial. In particular, we have the following theorem, which states that the regularity of the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph can be used to test non-simplicity of finite non-abelian groups.

    Theorem 3.18. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular, then G is not simple.

    Proof. We prove the contrapositive. Suppose that G is simple. Then G{e}. Since G is not abelian, Z(G)G. By definition, Z(G)={e} because Z(G)G. By Theorem 3.17, the non-central part of ΓeG is not regular.

    Lemma 3.19. Let G1,G2,,Gn be finite groups such that at least one of them is non-abelian and set J={j:1jn,Gjisnonabelian}. If the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of ni=1Gi is regular, then |J|=1 and the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of Gj with jJ is regular.

    Proof. Note that ni=1Gi is not abelian because J. Denote by ek the identity of Gk for all k=1,2,,n.

    We first prove that |J|=1. Assume to the contrary that |J|2. Thus, we can pick i,jJ with ij so that Gi and Gj are non-abelian. Let gGiZ(Gi) and let hGjZ(Gj). Set

    x=(e1,,ei1,g,ei+1,,en)andy=(e1,,ej1,h,ej+1,,en).

    Since Z(ni=1Gi)=ni=1Z(Gi), x and xy do not lie in Z(ni=1Gi). Using Theorem 2.1, we obtain that |K(x)|=|K(g)| and |K(xy)|=|K(g)||K(h)|. Since |K(h)|>1, it follows that |K(x)||K(xy)|, contrary to the assumption. This implies |J|=1.

    Fix jJ and let g,hGjZ(Gj). Note that (e1,,ej1,g,ej+1,,en) and (e1,,ej1,h,ej+1,,en) do not lie in Z(ni=1Gi). By Theorem 2.1,

    K((e1,,ej1,g,ej+1,,en))=K(e1)××K(ej1)×K(g)×K(ej+1)××K(en)

    and

    K((e1,,ej1,h,ej+1,,en))=K(e1)××K(ej1)×K(h)×K(ej+1)××K(en).

    By assumption, |K((e1,,ej1,g,ej+1,,en))|=|K((e1,,ej1,h,ej+1,,en))|, which implies that |K(g)|=|K(h)|. This shows that any two components of the non-central part of ΓeGj have the same number of vertices, which completes the proof.

    We remark that the converse to Lemma 3.19 is in general not true. It is trivially true when n=1. However, there is a counterexample when n2. In fact, consider the direct product D8×D8. Using the presentation D8=r,s:r4=s2=e,rs=sr1, we obtain that the conjugacy classes of D8 are

    {e},{r2},{r,r3},{s,sr2},{sr,sr3}. (3.4)

    Therefore, the component of ΓeD8×D8 containing (e,r) has two vertices, whereas the component of ΓeD8×D8 containing (r,s) has four vertices, see Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Graphical presentation of ΓeD8×D8.

    We are now in a position to give a sufficient and necessary condition for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be regular.

    Theorem 3.20. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. Then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular if and only if GP×A, where P is a finite p-group such that the non-central part of its extended conjugate graph is regular and A is a finite abelian group.

    Proof. Suppose that the non-central part of ΓeG is regular. By Theorem 3.16, G is nilpotent. As a standard result in the theory of finite groups, GP1×P2××Pn, where P1,P2,,Pn are the Sylow subgroups of G corresponding to each prime dividing |G|. By Proposition 3.2, ΓeGΓeP1×P2××Pn. Since

    P1×P2××PnPσ(1)×Pσ(2)××Pσ(n)

    for all σSn, we can rearrange the factors Pi's so that P1,P2,,Pr are non-abelian and Pr+1,Pr+2,,Pn are abelian. Since G is non-abelian, P1,P2,,Pr exist. In the case when Pr+1,Pr+2,,Pn do not exist, we define A={e}; otherwise, we define A=Pr+1×Pr+2××Pn. A similar argument as in the proof of Lemma 3.19 shows that r=1. Define P=P1. Since P is a Sylow subgroup of G, it is indeed a finite p-group. By Lemma 3.19, the non-central part of ΓeP is regular. The converse can be proved by using Theorem 2.1.

    We remark that the group P mentioned in Theorem 3.20 is of conjugate type (pk,1) for some prime p and for some kN. In fact, for each xPZ(P), |K(x)|>1 and |K(x)| divides |P|. Hence, |K(x)|=pk, where p is a unique prime factor of |P| and kN. Next, define two classes of finite non-abelian groups:

    S={G:Gis a finite non-abelian group andΓeG[GZ(G)]is regular} (3.5)

    and

    T={G:Gis a finite non-abelianpgroup andΓeG[GZ(G)] is regular}. (3.6)

    Theorem 3.16 asserts that S is (properly) contained in the class of finite nilpotent groups. Theorem 3.20 asserts that S will be completely determined once T is completely determined. In other words, the study of finite non-abelian groups whose conjugate graphs are regular reduces to the case of finite p-groups. This will be partially done in Section 3.3 in the case of p3 and p4.

    For any finite group G, let π(G) be the set of prime divisors of |G|. Define a set ρ(G)π(G) by the condition that pρ(G) if and only if a Sylow p-subgroup of G is non-abelian. In view of Lemma 3.19 and Theorem 3.20, we obtain the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.21. Let G be a finite nilpotent group that is non-abelian. Then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular if and only if |ρ(G)|=1 and the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of a Sylow subgroup of G corresponding to a unique prime in ρ(G) is regular.

    Corollary 3.22. If G is a finite nilpotent group with |ρ(G)|2, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is not regular.

    It is easy to see that any direct product of non-abelian groups of prime power order satisfies the condition of Corollary 3.22. In [18], the authors show that two specific non-abelian groups of order 16 and 81 have regular conjugate graphs. We generalize this result to a general case, as shown in the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.23. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If |G/Z(G)|=p2, where p is a prime, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is the union of n copies of Kp, where n=|G||Z(G)|p.

    Proof. Let gGZ(G). Then |K(g)|2. Note that Z(G), which implies p^2 = [G\colon Z(G)] = [G\colon C_G (g)][C_G (g) \colon Z(G)] = |K(g)|[C_G (g) \colon Z(G)] . Thus, |K(g)| divides p^2 and so |K(g)| = p or |K(g)| = p^2 . If |K(g)| = p^2 , we would have [C_G (g) \colon Z(G)] = 1 and would have Z(G) = C_G (g) , which would imply g\in Z(G) , a contradition. Hence, |K(g)| = p . Therefore, the component containing g , which is a complete graph by Proposition 3.11, has p vertices. Since the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e has |G|-|Z(G)| vertices, the number of copies of K_p equals \dfrac{|G|-|Z(G)|}{p} .

    Corollary 3.24. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If |G/Z(G)| = p^2 , where p is a prime, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular.

    The converse to Corollary 3.24 is not true; a counterexample is the inner holomorph of the dihedral group D_8 , denoted by \mathrm{IHol}(D_8) . The conjugacy classes of \mathrm{IHol}(D_8) is computed in the Appendix. In fact, |{Z(\mathrm{IHol}(D_8)}|) = 2 and the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of \mathrm{IHol}(D_8) is the union of 15 copies of K_2 , see Figure 3. However, |{\mathrm{IHol}(D_8)/Z(\mathrm{IHol}(D_8))}| = 16 is not the square of a prime. As an application of Theorem 3.23, we obtain a formula for determining the clique number as well as the domination number of a finite non-abelian group G such that G/Z(G) has a prime squared order.

    Figure 3.  Graphical presentation of \Gamma_{\mathrm{IHol}(D_8)}^e .

    Corollary 3.25. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If |G/Z(G)| = p^2 , where p is a prime, then \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p .

    Proof. Note that |{K(g)}| = 1 for all g\in Z(G) . By Theorem 3.23, |{K(g)}| = p for all g\in G\setminus Z(G) . Hence, \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p by Eq (3.2).

    Corollary 3.26. Let G be a finite non-abelian group. If |G/Z(G)| = p^2 , where p is a prime, then \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = \dfrac{(p-1)|{Z(G)}| + |{G}|}{p} .

    Proof. By Theorem 3.23, the number of components of \Gamma_G^e equals |{Z(G)}| + \dfrac{|{G}|-|{Z(G)}|}{p} . Then the corollary follows from Proposition 3.13.

    In light of Theorem 3.20, it suffices to study regularity of the extended conjugate graph of a finite p -group. Therefore, in this section, we examine the extended conjugate graph of a group of order pq , p^3 and p^4 , where p and q are distinct primes. We emphasize that groups of order p and p^2 are always abelian for any prime p .

    Suppose that G is a non-abelian group of order pq , where p and q are primes. We remark that p and q are necessarily distinct since any group of prime squared order is abelian. Furthermore, p\mid (q-1) since if p\nmid (q-1) , then G\cong \mathbb{Z}_{pq} (cf. p. 143 of [9]) and so G is abelian. Note that, as mentioned in p. 179 of [9], if p and q are distinct primes such that p\mid (q-1) , then there is a unique non-abelian group of order pq , up to isomorphism.

    Proposition 3.27. If G is a non-abelian group of order pq , where p and q are distinct primes, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is not regular.

    Proof. By Lagrange's theorem, |{Z(G)}| \in \{{1, p, q, pq}\} . Since G is not abelian, it follows that |{Z(G)}| \ne pq . If |{Z(G)}|\in\{{p, q}\} , then |{G/Z(G)}| would be a prime and G/Z(G) would be a cyclic group, which would imply that G is abelian, a contradiction. Hence, |{Z(G)}| = 1 . By Theorem 3.17, the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is not regular.

    In this section, we prove that an arbitrary non-abelian group of order p^3 , where p is a prime, always has a regular conjugate graph. This enables us to compute the clique and domination numbers of the extended conjugate graph associated to a non-abelian group of order p^3 explicitly.

    Theorem 3.28. Let p be a prime. The non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of any non-abelian group of order p^3 is the union of p^2-1 copies of K_p and hence is a regular graph.

    Proof. Let G be a non-abelian group of order p^3 . By Lagrange's theorem, |{Z(G)}|\in\{{1, p, p^2, p^3}\} . A similar argument as in the proof of Proposition 3.27 shows that |{Z(G)}|\not\in\{{p^2, p^3}\} . Since G is a non-trivial finite p -group, Z(G)\ne\{{e}\} and so |{Z(G)}|\ne 1 . This forces |{Z(G)}| = p . Hence, |{G/Z(G)}| = p^2 . By Theorem 3.23, the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is the union of n copies of K_p , where n = \dfrac{|G|-|Z(G)|}{p} = p^2 -1 .

    Corollary 3.29. Let p be a prime. If G is a direct product of a non-abelian group of order p^3 and a finite abelian group, then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular.

    Proof. The corollary follows from Theorems 3.20 and 3.28.

    It is not difficult to check that any nilpotent non-abelian group of order p^3q or p^3q^2 , where p and q are distinct primes, satisfies the condition of Corollary 3.29.

    Corollary 3.30. If G is a non-abelian group of order p^3 , where p is a prime, then \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p .

    Theorem 3.31. If G is a non-abelian group of order p^3 , where p is a prime, then \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = p^2 + p -1 and R(G) = \dfrac{p^2 + p -1}{p^3} .

    Proof. As in the proof of Theorem 3.28, |{Z(G)}| = p and |{G/Z(G)}| = p^2 . It then follows by Corollary 3.26 that \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = \dfrac{(p-1)|{Z(G)}| + |{G}|}{p} = p^2 + p -1 . That R(G) = \dfrac{p^2 + p -1}{p^3} follows from Theorem 3.7 and Proposition 3.13.

    In this section, we show that the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph associated to a non-abelian group of order p^4 , where p is a prime, may be regular or non-regular. Furthermore, in the case when it is regular, it must be a union of complete graphs K_p .

    Theorem 3.32. Let p be a prime. If G is a non-abelian group of order p^4 , then either

    (1) the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is not regular or

    (2) the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is a union of K_p 's.

    Proof. Suppose that |{G}| = p^4 . If the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is not regular, then we are done. Therefore, we may assume that the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is regular. By Lagrange's theorem, |{Z(G)}| lies in \{{1, p, p^2, p^3, p^4}\} . A similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 3.28 shows that |{Z(G)}|\not\in\{{1, p^3, p^4}\} . Thus, |{Z(G)}| is p or p^2 . In the case when |{Z(G)}| = p^2 , we obtain that |{G/Z(G)}| = p^2 and so the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is a union of K_p 's by Theorem 3.23. Next, suppose that |{Z(G)}| = p . Hence, there are p^4 - p non-central elements of G . By hypothesis, these elements contribute to conjugacy classes of the same size. Note that if g\in G\setminus Z(G) , then |{K(g)}| > 1 and |{K(g)}| divides |{G}| . Hence, |{K(g)}| \in\{{p, p^2, p^3, p^4}\} . However, p^2, p^3, and p^4 do not divide p^4 - p . Hence, |{K(g)}| = p . This shows that each component of the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is K_p .

    Corollary 3.33. For any prime p , there is no non-abelian group of order p^4 such that the non-central part of its extended conjugate graph is a union of K_m 's, where m\in\{{p^2, p^3, p^4}\} .

    Proof. Suppose that G is a non-abelian group of order p^4 . If the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is not regular, then we are done. In the case when the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is regular, it must be a union of K_p 's by Theorem 3.32.

    The next proposition gives a sufficient and necessary condition for the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph associated to a group of order p^4 , where p is a prime, to be regular.

    Proposition 3.34. Let G be a non-abelian group of order p^4 , where p is a prime. Then the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular if and only if the clique number of the extended conjugate graph of G is p .

    Proof. Suppose that the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is regular. By Theorem 3.32, it must be a union of K_p 's. Hence, \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p . To prove the converse, suppose that \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p . Let g\in G\setminus Z(G) . Note that |{K(g)}|\ne 1 and that |{K(g)}| divides p^4 . By assumption, |{K(g)}|\leq p . Hence, |{K(g)}| = p and so the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is a union of K_p 's.

    We are now in a position to prove the main result of this section, which describes some aspects of the extended conjugate graph associated to a non-abelian group of order p^4 , where p is a prime.

    Theorem 3.35. Let G be a non-abelian group of order p^4 , where p is a prime. Then the following statements hold:

    (1) if |{Z(G)}| = p^2 , then \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p , \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = p^3 + p^2 -p , and R(G) = \dfrac{p^2+p-1}{p^3} ;

    (2) if |{Z(G)}| = p and if the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is regular, then \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p , \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = p^3 + p -1 , and R(G) = \dfrac{p^3 + p -1}{p^4} ;

    (3) if |{Z(G)}| = p and if the non-central part of the extended conjugate graph of G is not regular, then \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p^2 , p-1 < \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) < p^3 + p -1 , and \dfrac{p-1}{p^4} < R(G) < \dfrac{p^3 + p -1}{p^4} .

    Proof. To prove Part (1), suppose that |{Z(G)}| = p^2 . Then |{G/Z(G)}| = p^2 and so the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is regular. By Proposition 3.34, \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p . By Corollary 3.26, \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = p^3 + p^2 -p . By Theorem 3.7, R(G) = \dfrac{\gamma(\Gamma_G^e)}{|{G}|} = \dfrac{p^2+p-1}{p^3} .

    To prove Part (2), suppose that |{Z(G)}| = p and that the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is regular. By Proposition 3.34, \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p . As in the proof of Theorem 3.32, the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is a union of K_p 's. Hence, \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) = |{Z(G)}| + \dfrac{|{G}|-|{Z(G)}|}{p} = p^3 + p - 1 and so R(G) = \dfrac{p^3 + p - 1}{p^4} .

    To prove Part (3), suppose that |{Z(G)}| = p and that the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e is not regular. By Proposition 3.12, \omega(\Gamma_G^e) \leq |{G/Z(G)}| = p^3 . Next, we show that no component of \Gamma_G^e is K_{p^3} . Assume to the contrary that |{K(g)}| = p^3 for some g\in G . Note that g\not\in Z(G) . As in the proof of Theorem 3.23, p^3 = |{K(g)}|[C_G(g)\colon Z(G)] , which implies Z(G) = C_G(g) , a contradiction. Moreover, by assumption, not all components of \Gamma_G^e are K_p . Hence, at least one component of \Gamma_G^e is K_{p^2} and so \omega(\Gamma_G^e) = p^2 .

    Note that \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) > |{Z(G)}| > p-1 because G is non-abelian. As in the proof of Theorem 3.32, |{K(g)}|\in\{{p, p^2, p^3}\} for all g\in G\setminus Z(G) . Assume by contradiction that \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) \geq p^3 + p -1 . Hence, the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e has at least p^3 -1 components. As mentioned above, every component of the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e has at least p vertices. By assumption, there is at least one component of the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e having m vertices with m\in\{{p^2, p^3}\} . Hence, the non-central part of \Gamma_G^e has at least (p^3 -2)p + m vertices. This leads to a contradiction since

    p^4 - 2p + m \geq p^4 - 2p + p^2 = (p^4 - p)+(p^2 - p) > p^4 - p = |{G}|-|{Z(G)}|.

    Thus, \gamma(\Gamma_G^e) < p^3 + p -1 . This also implies that \dfrac{p-1}{p^4} < R(G) < \dfrac{p^3 + p -1}{p^4} .

    We remark that the first and third cases of Theorem 3.35 occur; a few concrete examples are listed in Table 1. Presentations of concrete groups mentioned in this article are listed in Table 2.

    Table 1.  Non-abelian groups of order 16 .
    Group Size of the center Conjugate type vector Graphical presentation
    D_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2 4 (2, 1) Figure 4
    Q_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2 4 (2, 1) Figure 4
    D_{16} 2 (4, 2, 1) Figure 1
    SD_{16} or QD_{16} 2 (4, 2, 1) Figure 5
    Q_{16} or \mathrm{Dic}_4 2 (4, 2, 1) Figure 5

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Presentations of groups mentioned in the article.
    Group Symbol Presentation
    dihedral group of order 8 D_8 \langle{r, s\colon r^4 = s^2 = e, rs = sr^{-1}}\rangle
    quaternion group of order 8 Q_8 \langle{r, s\colon r^2 = s^2 = (rs)^2}\rangle
    semidihedral group of order 16 SD_{16} \langle{r, s\colon r^8 = s^2 = e, rs = sr^3}\rangle
    dihedral group of order 16 D_{16} \langle{r, s\colon r^8 = s^2 = e, rs = sr^{-1}}\rangle
    generalized quaternion group of order 16 Q_{16} \langle{r, s\colon r^8 = s^4 =e, r^4 = s^2, s^{-1}rs = r^{-1}}\rangle

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    As noted before, the converse to Proposition 3.2 is not true. The extended conjugate graphs \Gamma_{D_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2}^e and \Gamma_{Q_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2}^e are isomorphic (see Figure 4) but the groups D_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2 and Q_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2 are not isomorphic since D_8\not\cong Q_8 (cf. [13]).

    Figure 4.  Graphical presentation of \Gamma_{D_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2}^e and \Gamma_{Q_8\times \mathbb{Z}_2}^e .
    Figure 5.  Graphical presentation of \Gamma_{SD_{16}}^e and \Gamma_{Q_{16}}^e .

    In this work, we define the extended conjugate graph of a finite group G and study several properties of extended conjugate graphs that are related to the algebraic structure of their corresponding groups. As an application of these results, we give a graph-theoretic proof of the class equation. We also obtain a few conditions for the non-central part of an extended conjugate graph to be a regular graph. Finally, we study extended conjugate graphs of groups of order pq, p^3 , and p^4 , where p and q are distinct primes, in detail.

    The work of T. Suksumran was supported by the Research Group in Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Chiang Mai University under Grant no. R000029618. The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and their invaluable comments that improve the final version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    The inner holomorph of the dihedral group D_8 is a group of order 32 , which can be recognized as a group of matrices over \mathbb{Z}_2 :

    \mathrm{IHol}(D_8) = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&a&b&c \\ 0&1&0&d \\ 0&0&1&f \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix} \colon a, b, c, d, f\in \mathbb{Z}_2 \right\},

    together with the usual matrix multiplication. The conjugacy classes of \mathrm{IHol}(D_8) are as follows:

    \begin{align*} K_1 & = \left\{ \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix} \right\},\quad K_2 = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix} \right\},\quad K_3 = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_4 & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_5 = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_6 & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_7 = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_8 & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_9 = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_{10} & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_{11} = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_{12} & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_{13} = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_{14} & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_{15} = \left\{ \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\\ K_{16} & = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\},\quad K_{17} = \left\{\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1&1 \\ 0&1&0&1 \\ 0&0&1&1 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\right\}. \end{align*}

    |S|        cardinality of S

    Z(G)        center of G

    C_G(g)        centralizer of g in G

    \omega(\Gamma)        clique number of \Gamma

    K_m        complete graph with m vertices

    K(g)        conjugacy class of g

    \Gamma_G^c        conjugate graph of G

    (n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_r)    conjugate type vector, conjugate type of a group

    \mathrm{Dic}_4        dicyclic group of degree 4

    D_{2n}        dihedral group of order 2n

    \prod\limits_{{i = 1}}^{{n}}G_i        direct product group G_1\times G_2\times\cdots\times G_n

    \gamma(\Gamma)        domination number of \Gamma

    \Gamma_G^e        extended conjugate graph of G

    Q_{16}        generalized quaternion group of order 16

    \mathbb{Z}_n        group of integers modulo n

    [G\colon H]        index of H in G

    \Gamma[S]        induced subgraph of \Gamma by S

    \mathrm{IHol}(D_8)        inner holomorph of the dihedral group D_8

    k(G)        number of conjugacy classes of G

    R(G)        probability of commutativity in G

    QD_{16}        quasidihedral group of order 16

    Q_8        quaternion group of order 8

    U(G)        same-size conjugate set of G

    SD_{16}        semidihedral group of order 16

    \pi(G)        set of prime divisors of |G|

    \rho(G)        set of primes p such that a Sylow p -subgroup of G is non-abelian

    S_n        symmetric group of degree n

    \mathrm{deg}\, {v}        vertex degree of v

    V(\Gamma)        vertex set of \Gamma



    [1] N. Ahmadkhah, M. Zarrin, On the set of same-size conjugate classes, Comm. Algebra, 47 (2019), 3932–3938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2019.1572171 doi: 10.1080/00927872.2019.1572171
    [2] M. Bianchi, J. M. A. Brough, R. D. Camina, E. Pacifici, On vanishing class sizes in finite groups, J. Algebra, 489 (2017), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.07.007
    [3] M. Bianchi, R. D. Camina, M. Herzog, E. Pacifici, Conjugacy classes of finite groups and graph regularity, Forum Math., 27 (2015), 3167–3172. https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0098 doi: 10.1515/forum-2013-0098
    [4] A. R. Camina, Arithmetical conditions on the conjugacy class numbers of a finite group, J. Lond. Math. Soc., 5 (1972), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-5.1.127 doi: 10.1112/jlms/s2-5.1.127
    [5] A. R. Camina, R. D. Camina, The influence of conjugacy class sizes on the structure of finite groups: A survey, Asian-Eur. J. Math., 4 (2011), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557111000459 doi: 10.1142/S1793557111000459
    [6] R. D. Camina, Applying combinatorial results to products of conjugacy classes, J. Group Theory, 23 (2020), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1515/jgth-2020-0036 doi: 10.1515/jgth-2020-0036
    [7] G. Chartrand, L. Lesniak, P. Zhang, Graphs & digraphs, 6 Eds., Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
    [8] J. Cossey, T. Hawkes, A. Mann, A criterion for a group to be nilpotent, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 24 (1992), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/24.3.267 doi: 10.1112/blms/24.3.267
    [9] D. S. Dummit, R. M. Foote, Abstract algebra, 3 Eds., Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
    [10] A. Erfanian, B. Tolue, Conjugate graphs of finite groups, Discrete Math. Algorit. Appl., 4 (2012). https: //doi.org/10.1142/S1793830912500358
    [11] P. X. Gallagher, The number of conjugacy classes in a finite group, Math. Z., 118 (1970), 175–179.
    [12] N. Gavioli, A. Mann, V. Monti, A. Previtali, C. M. Scoppola, Groups of prime power order with many conjugacy classes, J. Algebra, 202 (1998), 129–141.
    [13] R. Hirshon, On cancellation in groups, Am. Math. Mon., 76 (1969), 1037–1039. https: //doi.org/10.2307/2317133
    [14] N. Itô, On finite groups with given conjugate types. I, Nagoya Math. J., 6 (1953), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-201X.1953.tb10725.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.1953.tb10725.x
    [15] D. MacHale, How commutative can a non-commutative group be? Math. Gaz., 58 (1974), 199–202. https: //doi.org/10.2307/3615961
    [16] S. Wang, When is the Cayley graph of a semigroup isomorphic to the Cayley graph of a group, Math. Slovaca, 67 (2017), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2016-0245 doi: 10.1515/ms-2016-0245
    [17] J. Xu, Theory and application of graphs, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
    [18] A. Zulkarnain, N. Sarmin, A. Noor, On the conjugate graphs of finite p-groups, Malays. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., 13 (2017), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.557 doi: 10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.557
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Teerapong Suksumran, On Schreier graphs of gyrogroup actions, 2022, 226, 00224049, 107134, 10.1016/j.jpaa.2022.107134
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2295) PDF downloads(80) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog