Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Evaluation of time-fractional Fisher's equations with the help of analytical methods

  • Received: 23 May 2022 Revised: 04 August 2022 Accepted: 09 August 2022 Published: 23 August 2022
  • MSC : 34A34, 35A20, 35A22, 44A10, 33B15

  • This article shows how to solve the time-fractional Fisher's equation through the use of two well-known analytical methods. The techniques we propose are a modified form of the Adomian decomposition method and homotopy perturbation method with a Yang transform. To show the accuracy of the suggested techniques, illustrative examples are considered. It is confirmed that the solution we get by implementing the suggested techniques has the desired rate of convergence towards the accurate solution. The main benefit of the proposed techniques is the small number of calculations. To show the reliability of the suggested techniques, we present some graphical behaviors of the accurate and analytical results, absolute error graphs and tables that strongly agree with each other. Furthermore, it can be used for solving fractional-order physical problems in various fields of applied sciences.

    Citation: Ahmed M. Zidan, Adnan Khan, Rasool Shah, Mohammed Kbiri Alaoui, Wajaree Weera. Evaluation of time-fractional Fisher's equations with the help of analytical methods[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18746-18766. doi: 10.3934/math.20221031

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zui-Cha Deng, Fan-Li Liu, Liu Yang . Numerical simulations for initial value inversion problem in a two-dimensional degenerate parabolic equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3080-3104. doi: 10.3934/math.2021187
    [2] Jia Li, Zhipeng Tong . Local Hölder continuity of inverse variation-inequality problem constructed by non-Newtonian polytropic operators in finance. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28753-28765. doi: 10.3934/math.20231472
    [3] Dun-Gang Li, Fan Yang, Ping Fan, Xiao-Xiao Li, Can-Yun Huang . Landweber iterative regularization method for reconstructing the unknown source of the modified Helmholtz equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10327-10342. doi: 10.3934/math.2021598
    [4] Jia Li, Changchun Bi . Study of weak solutions of variational inequality systems with degenerate parabolic operators and quasilinear terms arising Americian option pricing problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19758-19769. doi: 10.3934/math.20221083
    [5] Yu Xu, Youjun Deng, Dong Wei . Numerical solution of forward and inverse problems of heat conduction in multi-layered media. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6144-6167. doi: 10.3934/math.2025280
    [6] Zuliang Lu, Fei Cai, Ruixiang Xu, Chunjuan Hou, Xiankui Wu, Yin Yang . A posteriori error estimates of hp spectral element method for parabolic optimal control problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5220-5240. doi: 10.3934/math.2022291
    [7] Batirkhan Turmetov, Valery Karachik . On solvability of some inverse problems for a nonlocal fourth-order parabolic equation with multiple involution. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6832-6849. doi: 10.3934/math.2024333
    [8] Yashar Mehraliyev, Seriye Allahverdiyeva, Aysel Ramazanova . On one coefficient inverse boundary value problem for a linear pseudoparabolic equation of the fourth order. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2622-2633. doi: 10.3934/math.2023136
    [9] Guojie Zheng, Baolin Ma . Observability estimate for the parabolic equations with inverse square potential. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13525-13532. doi: 10.3934/math.2021785
    [10] W. Y. Chan . Blow-up for degenerate nonlinear parabolic problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1488-1498. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1488
  • This article shows how to solve the time-fractional Fisher's equation through the use of two well-known analytical methods. The techniques we propose are a modified form of the Adomian decomposition method and homotopy perturbation method with a Yang transform. To show the accuracy of the suggested techniques, illustrative examples are considered. It is confirmed that the solution we get by implementing the suggested techniques has the desired rate of convergence towards the accurate solution. The main benefit of the proposed techniques is the small number of calculations. To show the reliability of the suggested techniques, we present some graphical behaviors of the accurate and analytical results, absolute error graphs and tables that strongly agree with each other. Furthermore, it can be used for solving fractional-order physical problems in various fields of applied sciences.



    The boundary value problems (BVPs) for differential equations have important applications in space science and engineering technology. A large number of mathematical models in the fields of engineering, astronomy, mechanics, economics, etc, are often described by differential BVPs [1,2,3]. Except for a few special types, the exact solution of the BVPs is difficult to express in analytical form. It is especially important to find an approximate solution to obtain its numerical solution. In [4], Sinc collocation method provided an exponential convergence rate for two-point BVPs. [5] constructed a simple collocation method by the Haar wavelets for the numerical solution of linear and nonlinear second-order BVPs with periodic boundary conditions. Erge [6] studied the quadratic/linear rational spline collocation method for linear BVPs. In [7], based on B-spline wavelets, the numerical solutions of nonlinear BVPs were derived. Pradip et al. used B-spline to Bratuis problem which is an important nonlinear BVPs in [8,9,10]. [11,12,13,14,15,16] solved BVPs by the reproducing kernel method. Based on the idea of least squares, Xu et al. [17,18,19] gave an effective algorithm in reproducing kernel space for solving fractional differential integral equations and interface problems.

    It is a common technique to use orthogonal polynomials to solve differential equations. In [20,21,22,23], the authors used Chebyshev-Galerkin scheme for the time-fractional diffusion equation. In [24], the authors developed Jacobi rational operational approach for time-fractional sub-diffusion equation on a semi-infinite domain. [25,26,27,28] developed multiscale orthonormal basis to solve BVPs with various boundary conditions, and the stability and convergence order were also discussed. Legendre wavelet is widely used in various fields, such as signal system, because of its good properties. In this paper, a multiscale function is constructed by using Legendre polynomials to solve the approximate solution of differential equations. We use the multiscale fine ability of Legendre wavelet to construct multiwavelet, which has better approximation than single wavelet. In addition, we improve Legendre wavelet for specific problems, and the improved one still has compact support. We know that for functions with compact support, the better the tight support, the more concentrated the energy. Moreover, in the calculation process, the calculation speed can be enhanced, and the error accumulation is low.

    The purpose of this paper is to construct a set of multiscale orthonormal basis with compact support based on Legendre wavelet to find the approximate solution of the boundary value problems:

    {u(x)+p(x)u(x)+q(x)u(x)=F(x,u),x(0,1),a1u(0)+b1u(1)+c1u(0)+d1u(1)=α1,a2u(0)+b2u(1)+c2u(0)+d2u(1)=α2, (1.1)

    where p(x) and q(x) are both smooth. ai,bi,ci,di,i=1,2 are constants. When F is just about the function of x, F(x,u)=f(x), Eq (1.1) is linear boundary value problem. According to [21], the nonlinear boundary value problem can be transformed into a linear boundary value problem by using Quasi-Newton method. So this paper mainly studies the case of F(x,u)=f(x), that is, the linear boundary value problem.

    As we all know, if the basis function has good properties, the approximate solution of the boundary value problem has good convergence, stability and so on. In [25], the orthonormal basis on [0, 1] was constructed by the compact support function to obtain the numerical solution of the boundary value problem. But the basis function is not compactly supported at [0, 1], and the approximating solution is linearly convergent. In this paper, based on the idea of wavelet, a set of orthonormal bases with compact support is constructed by using Legendre polynomials, and the approximate solution of the boundary value problem is obtained by using these bases. Based on the constructed orthonormal basis, the proposed algorithm has convergence and stability, and the convergence order of the algorithm is more than 2 orders.

    The purpose of this work is to deduce the numerical solutions of Eq (1.1). In Section 2, using wavelet theory, a set of multiscale orthonormal basis is presented by Legendre polynomials in W32[0,1]. The constructed basis is compactly supported. It is well known that the compact support performance generates sparse matrices during calculation, thus improving the convergence rate. The numerical method of ε-approximate solution is presented in Section 3. And Section 4 proves the convergence order of ε-approximate solution and stability. In Section 5, the proposed algorithm has been applied to some numerical experiments. Finally, we end with some conclusions in Section 6.

    Wu and Lin introduced the reproducing kernel space W12[0,1] and W32[0,1] [29]. Let

    W32,0[0,1]={u|u(0)=u(0)=u(0)=0,   uW32[0,1]}.

    Clearly, W32,0[0,1] is the closed subspace of W32[0,1].

    Legendre polynomials are mathematically important functions. This section constructs the orthonormal basis in W32[0,1] by Legendre polynomials. Legendre polynomials are known to be orthogonal on L2[1,1]. For convenience, we first compress Legendre's polynomials to [0,1], and get the following four functions:

    φ0(x)=1;  φ1(x)=3(1+2x);φ2(x)=5(16x+6x2);φ3(x)=7(1+12x30x2+20x3).

    By translating and weighting the above four functions, we can construct

    ψl(x)=3j=0(aljφj(2x)+bljφj(2x1)),l=0,1,2,3. (2.1)

    In application, we hope ψl(x) has good properties, for example, as many coefficients as zero and orthogonality, so ψl(x) needs to meet the following conditions

    10xjψl(x)dx=0,j=0,1,2,,l+3, (2.2)
    10ψi(x)ψj(x)dx=δij,i,j=0,1,2,3. (2.3)

    The coefficients alj,blj can be get by Eqs (2.2) and (2.3), immediately ψl(x) is as follows:

    ψ0(x)=1517{3+56x216x2+224x3,x[0,12],61296x+456x2224x3,x[12,1]. (2.4)
    ψ1(x)=121{11+270x1320x2+1680x3, x[0,12],619+2670x3720x2+1680x3,x[12,1]. (2.5)
    ψ2(x)=3517{1+30x174x2+256x3,x[0,12],111450x+594x2256x3,x[12,1]. (2.6)
    ψ3(x)=521{136x+246x2420x3,x[0,12],209804x+1014x2420x3,x[12,1]. (2.7)

    Through the ideas of the wavelet, scale transformation of the functions ψl(x) gets Legendre wavelet

    ψlik(x)=2i12ψl(2ixk),l=0,1,2,3;i=1,2,;k=0,1,,2i11.

    Clearly, ψlik(x) has compactly support in [k2i1,k+12i1]. Let

    Wi=span{ψlik(x)}3l=0,i=1,2,;k=0,1,,2i11.

    Then,

    L2[0,1]=V0i=1Wi,

    where

    V0={φ0(x),φ1(x),φ2(x),φ3(x)}.

    According to the above analysis, we can get the following theorem.

    Theorem 2.1.

    {ρj(x)}j=1={φ0(x),φ1(x),φ2(x),φ3(x),ψ010(x),ψ110(x),ψ210(x),ψ310(x),,ψ0ik(x),ψ1ik(x),ψ2ik(x),ψ3ik(x),}

    is the orthonormal basis in L2[0,1].

    Now we generate the orthonormal basis in W32,0[0,1] from the basis in L2[0,1]. Note

    J3u(x)=12x0(xt)2u(t)dt. (2.8)

    Theorem 2.2. {J3ρj(x)}j=1 is the orthonormal basis in W32,0[0,1].

    Proof. Only need to prove completeness and orthogonality. For uW32,0[0,1], if

    <u,J3ρj>W32,0=0,

    you can deduce u0, then {J3ρj(x)}j=1 are complete. In fact,

    <u,J3ρj>W32,0=<u,ρj>L2=10uρjdx=0. (2.9)

    From Theorem 2.1, u0. Due to uW32,0[0,1], u(0)=u(0)=u(0)=0, then, u0.

    According to Theorem 2.1 and Eq (2.9), orthonormal is obvious.

    Because of W32,0[0,1]W32[0,1] and three more conditions for W32[0,1] than W32,0[0,1]. So the orthonormal basis for W32[0,1] as follows:

    Theorem 2.3.

    {J3gj(x)}j=1={1,x,x22}{J3ρj(x)}j=1

    are the orthonormal basis in W32[0,1].

    Put L: W32[0,1]L2[0,1],

    Lu=u(x)+p(x)u(x)+q(x)u(x).

    L is a linear bounded operator in [27]. Let Bi: W32[0,1]R, and

    Biu=aiu(0)+biu(1)+ciu(0)+diu(1),i=1,2.

    The {Quasi-Newton} method is used to transform Eq (1.1) into a linear boundary value problem, and its operator equation is as follows:

    {Lu=f(x),B1u=α1,  B2u=α2. (3.1)

    Definition 3.1. uε is named ε-approximate solution for Eq (3.1), ε>0, if

    Luεf2L2+2i=1(Biuεαi)2<ε2.

    In [27], it is shown that ε-approximate solution for Eq (3.1) exists by the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.1. Equation (3.1) exists ε-approximate solution

    uεn(x)=nk=1ckJ3gk(x),

    where n is a natural number determined by ε, and ci satisfies

    nk=1ckLJ3gkLu2L2+2l=1(nk=1ckJ3gkBlu)2=minck{nk=1ckLJ3gkLu2L2+2l=1(nk=1ckJ3gkBlu)2}.

    To seek the ε-approximate solution, we just need ck. Let G be quadratic form about

    c=(c1,,cn)T,
    G(c1,,cn)=nk=1ckLJ3gkLu2L2+2l=1(nk=1ckJ3gkBlu)2. (3.2)

    From Theorem 3.1,

    c=(c1,,cn)T

    is the minimum point of G(c1,,cn). If L is reversible, the minimum point of G exists and is unique.

    In fact, the partial derivative of G(c1,,cn) with respect to cj:

    Gcj=2nk=1ckLJ3gk,LJ3gjL22LJ3gj,LuL2+22l=1(nk=1ckJ3gkJ3gjJ3gjBlu).

    Let

    cjG(c1,,cn)=0,

    so

    nk=1ckLJ3gk,LJ3gjL2+2nk=1ckJ3gkJ3gj=LJ3gj,LuL2+2l=1J3gjBlu. (3.3)

    Let An be the n-order matrix and bn be the n-dimensional vector, i.e.,

    An=(LJ3gk,LJ3gjL2+2J3gkJ3gj)n×n,bn=(LJ3gk,LuL2+2l=1J3gjBlu)n.

    Then Eq (3.3) changes to

    Anc=bn. (3.4)

    If L is invertible, Eq (3.4) has only one solution c, and c is minimum point of G. Equation (3.4) has an unique solution is proved as follows.

    Theorem 3.2. If L is invertible, Eq (3.3) has only one solution.

    Proof. The homogeneous linear equation of Eq (3.4) is

    nk=1ckLJ3gk,LJ3gjL2+2nk=1ckJ3gkJ3gj=0.

    Just prove that the above equation has an unique solution. Let cj(j=1,2,,n) multiply to both sides of the equation, and add all equations together so that

    nk=1ckLJ3gk,nj=1cjLJ3gjL2+2nk=1ckJ3gknj=1cjJ3gj=0.

    That is

    nk=1ckLJ3gkL2+2(nk=1ckJ3gk)2=0.

    Clearly,

    nk=1ckLJ3gk2L2=0,(nk=1ckJ3gk)2=0.

    Because J3gk is orthonormal basis, if L is invertible, ck=0. So Eq (3.3) has only one solution.

    Convergence and stability are important properties of algorithms. This section deals with the convergence and stability.

    In order to discuss the convergence, Theorem 4.1 is given as follows:

    Theorem 4.1. J3ψlik(x) is compactly supported in [k2i1,k+12i1].

    Proof. When

    x<k2i1,   J3ψlik(x)=0.

    When x>k+12i1, because of ψlik(x) with compact support, then,

    J3ψlik(x)=12x0(xt)2ψlik(t)dt=12k+12i1k2i1(xt)2ψlik(t)dt=2i32k+12i1k2i1(xt)2ψl(2i1tk)dt=25(i1)210(s2i1xk)2ψl(s)ds, s=2i1tk. (4.1)

    According to Eq (2.2), J3ψlik(x)=0. So J3ψlik(x) has compactly support in [k2i1,k+12i1].

    Note

    (J3ψli,k(x))=J2ψli,k(x), (J3ψli,k(x))=J1ψli,k(x).

    By referring to the proof of Theorem 4.1, J1ψlik(x) and J2ψlik(x) are compactly supported in [k2i1,k+12i1].

    The order of convergence will proceed below. Assume

    u(x)=2j=0cjxjj!+3j=0djJ3φj(x)+i=12i11k=03l=0(c(l)i,kJ3ψli,k), (4.2)

    where

    cj=<u,xjj!>W32,   dj=<u,φj(x)>W32,

    and

    c(l)i,k=<u,   J3ψli,k(x)>W32.

    And

    un(x)=2j=0cjxjj!+3j=0djJ3φj(x)+ni=12i11k=03l=0(c(l)i,kJ3ψli,k).

    Theorem 4.2. Assume uεn(x) is the ε-approximate solution of Eq (3.1). If u(m)(x) is bounded in [0,1], mN,3m7, then,

    |u(x)uεn(x)|2(m2)nM,

    here M is a constant.

    Proof. From Definition 3.1 and Theorem 3.1, we get

    |u(x)uεn(x)|M0uuεnW32M0L1L(uuεn)L2M0L1(L(uuεn)L2+|B1(uuεn)|+|B2(uuεn)|)M0L1(L(uun)L2+B1(uun)+B2(uun)).

    Obviously,

    B1(uun)=0,B2(uun)=0.

    That is

    |u(x)uεn(x)|M0L1L(uun)L2M0L1(10(L(uun))2dx)12M0L1(maxx[0,1]{|L(uun)|2})123M0L1M1maxx[0,1]{|uun|,|uun|,|uun|},

    where

    M1=maxx[0,1]{1,|p(x)|,|q(x)|}.

    We know

    |uun|=|i=n+12i11k=03l=0c(l)i,kJ3ψli,k(x)|i=n+12i11k=03l=0|c(l)i,k||J3ψli,k(x)|.

    By the compactly support of Jpψlik(x),p=1,2,3, fixed i, then Jpψlik(x)0 only in [k2i1,k+12i1],

    |uun|i=n+13l=0|c(l)i,k||J3ψli,k(x)|.

    Similarly,

    |uun|i=n+13l=0|c(l)i,k||J2ψli,k(x)|

    and

    |uun|i=n+13l=0|c(l)i,k||J1ψli,k(x)|.

    Through J1ψli,k(x),J2ψli,k(x) and J3ψli,k(x), you can get

    |u(x)uεn(x)|3M0M1L1|uun|.

    As |uun|, |c(l)i,k| and |J1ψli,k(x)| will be discussed below. We can get that |c(l)i,k| is related to u(m)(x). In fact,

    |c(l)i,k|=|<u,J3ψli,k(x)>W32|=|10(u(x))ψli,k(x)dx|=|k+12i1k2i1u(x)ψli,k(x)dx|. (4.3)

    Taylor's expansion of u(x) at k2i1 is

    u(x)=m1j=3u(j)(k2i1)(j3)!(xk2i1)j3+u(m)(ξ)(m3)!(xk2i1)m3, ξ[k2i1,k+12i1].

    Equation (4.3) is changed to

    |c(l)i,k|=|k+12i1k2i1(m1j=3u(j)(k2i1)(j3)!(xk2i1)j3+u(m)(ξ)(m3)!(xk2i1)m3)ψli,k(x)dx|=|m1j=3u(j)(k2i1)(j3)!k+12i1k2i1(xk2i1)j3ψlik(x)dx|+|k+12i1k2i1u(m)(ξ)(m3)!(xk2i1)m3)ψli,k(x)dx|,

    where

    k+12i1k2i1(xk2i1)j3ψlik(x)dx=2i12k+12i1k2i1(xk2i1)j3ψl(2i1xk)dxt=2i1xk=2(32j)(i1)210(t)j3ψl(t)dt.

    According to Eq (2.2),

    m1j=3u(j)(k2i1)(j3)!k+12i1k2i1(xk2i1)j3ψlik(x)dx=0,

    so

    |c(l)i,k|=|k+12i1k2i1u(m)(ξ)(m3)!(xk2i1)m3ψli,k(x)dx||u(m)(ξ)(m3)!|k+12i1k2i1|xk2i1|m3|ψli,k(x)|dx|u(m)(ξ)(m3)!|2(m3)(i1)k+12i1k2i1|ψli,k(x)|dx|u(m)(ξ)(m3)!|2(m3)(i1)2i12.

    Because u(m)(x) is bounded,

    |u(m)(ξ)(m3)!|M3,

    then,

    |c(l)i,k|2(2m5)(i1)2M3. (4.4)

    By the compactly support of J1ψlik(x),

    |J1ψli,k(x)|=|x0ψli,k(t)dt|k+12i1k2i1|ψli,k(t)|dt2i12.

    According to the above analysis,

    |uun|i=n+14M32(2m5)(i1)22(i1)2=4M32(m2)n.

    That is

    |u(x)uεn(x)|2(m2)nM,

    where M is a constant.

    Stability analysis is conducted below. According to the third section, the stability of the algorithm is related to the stability of Eq (3.4). By the following Property 4.1, the stability of the algorithm can be discussed by the number of conditions of the matrix A.

    Property 4.1. If the matrix A is symmetric and reversible, then

    cond(A)=|λmaxλmin|,

    where λmax and λmin are the largest and smallest eigenvalues of A respectively.

    In this paper,

    An=(aij)n×n=(LJ3gi,LJ3gjL2+2J3giJ3gj)n×n.

    Clearly, An is symmetric. From Theorem 3.2, An is reversible. In order to discuss the stability of the algorithm, only the eigenvalues of matrix An need to be discussed.

    Theorem 4.3. Assume uW32 and uW32=1. If L is an invertible differential operator, then,

    LuL21L1.

    Proof. Since L is an invertible, assume Lu=v, then u=L1v. Moreover

    1=uW32=L1vW32L1vL2.

    Then,

    vL21L1.

    That is,

    LuL21L1.

    Theorem 4.4. Let λ {be} the eigenvalues of matrix A of Eq (3.4), x=(x1,,xn)T is related eigenvalue of λ and x=1, then,

    λL2+2.

    Proof. By Ax=λx,

    λxi=nj=1aijxj=nj=1(LJ3gi,LJ3gjL2+2J3giJ3gj)xj=LJ3gi,nj=1xjLJ3gjL2+2J3ginj=1(J3gjxj),i=1,,n. (4.5)

    Let xi multiply to both sides of Eq (4.5), and then add the equations from j=1 to j=n together so that

    λ=λx2i=ni=1xiLJ3gi,nj=1xjLJ3gjL2+2ni=1(J3gixi)nj=1(J3gjxj)=ni=1xiLJ3gi2L2+2(ni=1(J3gixi))2L2ni=1x2i+2ni=1x2i=(L2+2)x. (4.6)

    Since

    x=1,   λL2+2.

    From Theorem 4.3 and Eq (4.6), we can get

    λni=1xiLJ3giL2=L(ni=1xiJ3gi)L21L1.

    Then,

    cond(A)=|λmaxλmin|L2+21L1=(L2+2)L1.

    That is the condition number of A is bounded, so the presented method is stable.

    This section discusses numerical examples to reveal the accuracy of the proposed algorithm. Examples 5.1 and 5.3 are linear and nonlinear BVPs respectively. Example 5.2 shows that our method also applies to Eq (1.1) with other linear boundary value conditions. In this paper, N is the number of bases, and

    N=7+4(2n1),n=1,2,.

    eN(x) is the absolute errors. C.R. and cond represent the convergence order and the condition number respectively. For convenience, we denote

    eN(x)=|u(x)uN(x)|

    and

    C.R.=log2max|eN(x)|max|eN+1(x)|.

    Example 5.1. Consider the test problem suggested in [28,30]

    {u=u+2u+4x2ex,x(0,1),u(0)=2,u(1)=e1,

    where the exact solution is u(x)=ex2x+1. The numerical results are shown in Table 1. It is clear from Table 1 that the present method produces a converging solution for different values. In addition, the results of the proposed algorithm in Table 1 are compared with those in [28,30]. Obviously, the proposed algorithm is better. Table 2 shows eN(x), C.R., cond and CPU time. The unit of CPU time is second, expressed as s.

    Table 1.  eN(x) of Example 5.1.
    x eN(x) of [30] e66(x) of [28] e35(x) e67(x)
    0 0 5.67e-9 9.94e-14 8.88e-16
    0.1 1.19e-5 3.35e-9 2.04e-13 2.22e-16
    0.2 4.18e-5 3.93e-10 2.16e-13 1.55e-15
    0.3 4.96e-5 1.33e-9 1.42e-13 8.88e-16
    0.4 6.04e-5 1.40e-9 1.68e-14 1.33e-15
    0.5 6.33e-5 1.82e-9 1.82e-13 4.44e-16
    0.6 6.23e-5 5.96e-9 1.52e-13 2.66e-15
    0.7 5.76e-5 1.14e-8 1.66e-13 8.88e-16
    0.8 4.23e-5 1.52e-8 4.36e-13 4.44e-15
    0.9 2.15e-5 1.66e-8 4.93e-13 4.44e-16
    1.0 0 1.90e-8 2.67e-13 4.44e-15

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  eN(x), C.R. and cond of Example 5.1.
    n N maxeN(x) C.R. cond CPU(s)
    1 11 1.66e-8 274.262 2.57
    2 19 6.85e-11 7.92 274.262 7.89
    3 35 6.55e-13 6.71 274.262 24.42
    4 67 7.93e-15 6.40 274.262 82.73

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Example 5.2. Consider the problem suggested in [25,28].

    {u+u+xu=f(x),x(0,1),u(0)=2,u(1)+u(12)=sin12+sin1.

    The exact solution is u(x)=sinx, and f(x)=cosxsinx+xsinx. This problem is the boundary value problem with the multipoint boundary value conditions. Table 3 shows maximum absolute error MEn, C.R. and cond., which compared with the other algorithms, the results obtained demonstrate that our algorithm is remarkably effective. The numerical errors are provided in Figures 1 and 2, also show a good accuracy.

    Table 3.  MEn, C.R. and cond of Example 5.2.
    The present method [25] [28]
    n MEn C.R. cond n MEn C.R. cond n MEn C.R. cond
    11 3.73e-9 195.05 10 6.34e-6 3.96 182.06 11 1.88e-4
    19 2.97e-11 6.97 195.05 18 4.04e-7 3.98 182.06 19 5.99e-5 1.65 1.49×106
    35 2.13e-13 7.12 195.05 34 2.54e-8 4.06 182.06 35 1.84e-5 1.70 3.74×108
    67 2.77e-15 6.27 195.05 66 1.59e-9 3.95 182.06 67 4.62e-6 1.99 8.87×1010

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  eN(x) of Example 5.3 (n = 35).
    Figure 2.  eN(x) of Example 5.3 (n = 67).

    Example 5.3. Consider a nonlinear problem suggested in [7,9]

    {u+λeu=0,x(0,1)u(0)=0,u(1)=0,

    where

    u(x)=2ln(cosh((x12)(θ/2))/cosh(θ/4)),

    and θ satisfies

    θ2λcosh(θ/4)=0.

    This is the second-order nonlinear Bratu problem. { Bratu equation is widely used in engineering fields, such as spark discharge, semiconductor manufacturing, etc. In the field of physics, the Bratu equation is used to describe the physical properties of microcrystalline silica gel solar energy. In the biological field, the Bratu equation is used to describe the kinetic model of some biochemical reactions in living organisms.} To this problem, taking u0(x)=x(1x),k=3, where k is the number of iterations of the algorithm mentioned in [27]. when λ=1,λ=2, eN(x) are listed in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

    Table 4.  eN(x) of Example 5.3 (λ=1).
    x eN(x) of [8] eN(x) of [9] eN(x)
    0 0 0 4.4959e11
    0.2 1.4958e9 2.4390e5 4.1096e11
    0.4 2.7218e9 4.2096e5 7.1502e12
    0.6 2.7218e9 4.2096e5 7.1483e12
    0.8 1.4958e9 2.4390e5 4.1104e11

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  eN(x) of Example 5.3 (λ=2).
    x eN(x) of [7] eN(x) of [9] eN(x)
    0 5.8988e26 0 1.1801e12
    0.2 1.3070e7 6.9297e5 2.5646e10
    0.4 1.4681e7 1.0775e4 1.6666e9
    0.6 1.4681e7 1.0775e4 1.6666e9
    0.8 1.3070e7 6.9297e5 2.5646e10

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this paper, based on Legendre's polynomials, we construct orthonormal basis in L2[0,1] and W32[0,1], respectively. It proves that this group of bases is orthonormal and compactly supported. According to the orthogonality of the basis, we present an algorithm to obtain the approximate solution of the boundary value problems. Using the compact support of the basis, we prove that the convergence order of the presented method related to the boundedness of u(m)(x). Finally, three numerical examples show that the absolute error and convergence order of the algorithm are better than other methods.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This study was supported by National Natural Science Funds of China by Grant number (12101164), Characteristic Innovative Scientific Research Project of Guangdong Province (2023KTSCX181, 2023KTSCX183) and Basic and Applied Basic Research Project Zhuhai City (ZH24017003200026PWC).

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.



    [1] A. Loverro, Fractional calculus: History, definitions and applications for the engineer. Rapport technique, Univeristy of Notre Dame: Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 1–28.
    [2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Book review: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, 13 (2006), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x07003447
    [3] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, 198 Academic Press, 1999, San Diego, California, USA.
    [4] M. Inc, The approximate and exact solutions of the space- and time-fractional Burgers equations with initial conditions by variational iteration method, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345 (2008), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.007
    [5] Z. Odibat, Approximations of fractional integrals and Caputo fractional derivatives, Appl. Math. Comput., 178 (2006), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.072 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.072
    [6] S. Murtaza, F. Ali, A. Aamina, N. A. Sheikh, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, Exact analysis of non-linear fractionalized Jeffrey fluid, a novel approach of Atangana-Baleanu fractional model, Comput. Mater. Con., 65 (2020), 2033–2047. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.011817 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2020.011817
    [7] F. Ali, S. Murtaza, N. Sheikh, I. Khan, Heat transfer analysis of generalized Jeffery nanofluid in a rotating frame: Atangana-Balaenu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional models, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 129 (2019), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.08.013 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.08.013
    [8] N. Iqbal, T. Botmart, W. Mohammed, A. Ali, Numerical investigation of fractional-order Kersten-Krasil shchik coupled KdV-mKdV system with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Adv. Contin. Discrete Models, 2022 (2022), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03709-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-022-03709-5
    [9] H. Yasmin, N. Iqbal, A comparative study of the fractional coupled Burgers and Hirota-Satsuma KdV equations via analytical techniques, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071364 doi: 10.3390/sym14071364
    [10] A. Goswami, J. Singh, D. Kumar, S. Gupta, Sushila, An efficient analytical technique for fractional partial differential equations occurring in ion acoustic waves in plasma, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 4 (2019), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2019.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2019.01.003
    [11] N. Iqbal, A. Albalahi, M. Abdo, W. Mohammed, Analytical analysis of fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation: A modified homotopy perturbation transform method, J. Funct. Space., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3298472 doi: 10.1155/2022/3298472
    [12] V. Martynyuk, M. Ortigueira, Fractional model of an electrochemical capacitor, Signal Proc., 107 (2015), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.02.021 doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.02.021
    [13] C. Lorenzo, T. Hartley, Initialization, conceptualization, and application in the generalized (fractional) calculus, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 35 (2007), 447–553. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v35.i6.10 doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v35.i6.10
    [14] M. Kbiri Alaoui, K. Nonlaopon, A. Zidan, A. Khan, R. Shah, Analytical investigation of fractional-order Cahn-Hilliard and Gardner equations using two novel techniques, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10101643 doi: 10.3390/math10101643
    [15] M. Alshammari, N. Iqbal, D. Ntwiga, A comparative study of fractional-order diffusion model within Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operator, J. Funct. Space., 2022 (2022), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9226707 doi: 10.1155/2022/9226707
    [16] Y. Qin, A. Khan, I. Ali, M. Al Qurashi, H. Khan, R. Shah, et al., An efficient analytical approach for the solution of certain fractional-order dynamical systems, Energies, 13 (2020), 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112725 doi: 10.3390/en13112725
    [17] K. Nonlaopon, A. Alsharif, A. Zidan, A. Khan, Y. Hamed, R. Shah, Numerical investigation of fractional-order Swift-Hohenberg equations via a novel transform, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071263 doi: 10.3390/sym13071263
    [18] M. Rawashdeh, Approximate solutions for coupled systems of nonlinear PDEs using the reduced differential transform method, Math. Comput. Appl., 19 (2014), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca19020161 doi: 10.3390/mca19020161
    [19] S. El-Wakil, A. Elhanbaly, M. Abdou, Adomian decomposition method for solving fractional nonlinear differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 182 (2006), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.055 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.055
    [20] H. Khan, A. Khan, M. Al-Qurashi, R. Shah, D. Baleanu, Modified modelling for heat like equations within Caputo operator, Energies, 13 (2020), 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082002 doi: 10.3390/en13082002
    [21] A. Alderremy, S. Aly, R. Fayyaz, A. Khan, R. Shah, N. Wyal, The analysis of fractional-order nonlinear systems of third order KdV and Burgers equations via a novel transform, Complexity, 2022 (2022), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4935809 doi: 10.1155/2022/4935809
    [22] G. Adomian, Solution of physical problems by decomposition, Comput. Math. Appl., 27 (1994), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(94)90132-5 doi: 10.1016/0898-1221(94)90132-5
    [23] G. Adomian, A review of the decomposition method in applied mathematics, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 135 (1988), 501–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247x(88)90170-9 doi: 10.1016/0022-247x(88)90170-9
    [24] J. He, Homotopy perturbation technique, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 178 (1999), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00018-3 doi: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00018-3
    [25] J. He, A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 35 (2000), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7462(98)00085-7 doi: 10.1016/s0020-7462(98)00085-7
    [26] J. H. He, Application of homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear wave equations, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 26 (2005).
    [27] N. Iqbal, A. Akgul, A. Bariq, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, A. Ali, On solutions of fractional-order gas dynamics equation by effective techniques, J. Funct. Space., 2022 (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3341754 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005
    [28] J. He, Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems, Phys. Lett. A, 350 (2006), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005
    [29] W. He, N. Chen, I. Dassios, N. Shah, J. Chung, Fractional system of Korteweg-De Vries equations via Elzaki transform, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060673 doi: 10.3390/math9060673
    [30] N. Shah, P. Agarwal, J. Chung, E. El-Zahar, Y. Hamed, Analysis of optical solitons for nonlinear Schrodinger Equation with detuning term by iterative transform method, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 1850. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111850 doi: 10.3390/sym12111850
    [31] A. N. Kolmogorov, Étude de l'équation de la diffusion avec croissance de la quantité de matière et son application à un problème biologique, Bull. Univ. Moskow, Ser. Internat., Sec. A, 1 (1937), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01190613 doi: 10.1007/bf01190613
    [32] A. Mironer, D. Dosanjh, Coupled diffusion of heat and vorticity in a gaseous vortex, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 12 (1969), 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(69)90168-9 doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(69)90168-9
    [33] A. Ammerman, L. Cavalli-Sforza, Measuring the rate of spread of early farming in europe, Man, 6 (1971), 674. https://doi.org/10.2307/2799190 doi: 10.2307/2799190
    [34] M. Bramson, Maximal displacement of branching brownian motion, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 31 (1978), 531–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160310502 doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160310502
    [35] J. Canosa, Diffusion in nonlinear multiplicative media, J. Math. Phys., 10 (1969), 1862–1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664771 doi: 10.1063/1.1664771
    [36] X. Y. Wang, Exact and explicit solitary wave solutions for the generalised Fisher equation, Phys. Lett. A, 131 (1988), 277–279.
    [37] J. R. Branco, J. A. Ferreira, P. De Oliveira, Numerical methods for the generalized Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 57 (2007), 89–102.
    [38] J. E. Macías-Díaz, I. E. Medina-Ramírez, A. Puri, Numerical treatment of the spherically symmetric solutions of a generalized Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovsky-Piscounov equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 231 (2009), 851–868.
    [39] X. Y. Wang, Exact and explicit solitary wave solutions for the generalised Fisher equation, Phys. Lett. A, 131 (1988), 277–279.
    [40] A. M. Wazwaz, A. Gorguis, An analytic study of Fisher's equation by using Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 154 (2004), 609–620.
    [41] M. Rostamian, A. Shahrezaee, A meshless method to the numerical solution of an inverse reaction-diffusion-convection problem, Int. J. Comput. Math., 94 (2016), 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2015.1119816 doi: 10.1080/00207160.2015.1119816
    [42] H. Gu, B.Lou, M. Zhou, Long time behavior of solutions of Fisher-KPP equation with advection and free boundaries, J. Funct. Anal., 269 (2015), 1714–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2015.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.07.002
    [43] P. Sunthrayuth, R. Ullah, A. Khan, R. Shah, J. Kafle, I. Mahariq, et al., Numerical analysis of the fractional-order nonlinear system of Volterra integro-differential equations, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1537958 doi: 10.1155/2021/1537958
    [44] M. Areshi, A. Khan, R. Shah, K. Nonlaopon, Analytical investigation of fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equations via a novel transform, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 6936–6958. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022385 doi: 10.3934/math.2022385
    [45] Y. Zhao, D. Baleanu, M. Baleanu, D. Cheng, X. Yang, Mappings for special functions on Cantor sets and special integral transforms via local fractional operators, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/316978 doi: 10.1155/2013/316978
    [46] P. Sunthrayuth, H. Alyousef, S. El-Tantawy, A. Khan, N. Wyal, Solving fractional-order diffusion equations in a plasma and fluids via a novel transform, J. Funct. Space., 2022 (2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1899130 doi: 10.1155/2022/1899130
    [47] M. Alaoui, R. Fayyaz, A. Khan, M. Abdo, Analytical investigation of Noyes-Field model for time-fractional Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, Complexity, 2021 (2021), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3248376 doi: 10.1155/2021/3248376
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mohammed Elamine Beroudj, Abdelaziz Mennouni, Carlo Cattani, Hermite solution for a new fractional inverse differential problem, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10516
    2. 苗苗 宋, Inverse Problem of Option Drift Rate Based on Degenerate Parabolic Equations, 2023, 12, 2324-7991, 3814, 10.12677/AAM.2023.129375
    3. Yilihamujiang Yimamu, Zui-Cha Deng, C. N. Sam, Y. C. Hon, Total variation regularization analysis for inverse volatility option pricing problem, 2024, 101, 0020-7160, 483, 10.1080/00207160.2024.2345660
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1885) PDF downloads(111) Cited by(48)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog