Research article

Analysis of a fractional model for HIV CD4+ T-cells with treatment under generalized Caputo fractional derivative

  • Received: 15 March 2021 Accepted: 26 April 2021 Published: 29 April 2021
  • MSC : 26A33, 34A08, 34A34, 34C60, 47H10

  • In this paper, a mathematical model of generalized fractional-order is constructed to study the problem of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of CD4+ T-cells with treatment. The model consists of a system of four nonlinear differential equations under the generalized Caputo fractional derivative sense. The existence results for the fractional-order HIV model are investigated via Banach's and Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative fixed point theorems. Further, we also established different types of Ulam's stability results for the proposed model. The effective numerical scheme so-called predictor-corrector algorithm has been employed to analyze the approximated solution and dynamical behavior of the model under consideration. It is worth noting that, unlike many discusses recently conducted, dimensional consistency has been taken into account during the fractionalization process of the classical model.

    Citation: Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Weerawat Sudsutad. Analysis of a fractional model for HIV CD4+ T-cells with treatment under generalized Caputo fractional derivative[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7285-7304. doi: 10.3934/math.2021427

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohammad Sajid, Biplab Dhar, Ahmed S. Almohaimeed . Differential order analysis and sensitivity analysis of a CoVID-19 infection system with memory effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20594-20614. doi: 10.3934/math.20221129
    [2] Murugesan Sivashankar, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Vediyappan Govindan, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Samad Noeiaghdam . Stability analysis of COVID-19 outbreak using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2720-2735. doi: 10.3934/math.2023143
    [3] Qun Dai, Shidong Liu . Stability of the mixed Caputo fractional integro-differential equation by means of weighted space method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2498-2511. doi: 10.3934/math.2022140
    [4] Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Rozi Gul, Kamal Shah, Ibrahim Mahariq, Jarunee Soontharanon, Khursheed J. Ansari . Study of implicit-impulsive differential equations involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4017-4037. doi: 10.3934/math.2022222
    [5] Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Taghreed M. Jawa . A study of behaviour for fractional order diabetes model via the nonsingular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5072-5092. doi: 10.3934/math.2022282
    [6] Dongming Nie, Usman Riaz, Sumbel Begum, Akbar Zada . A coupled system of $ p $-Laplacian implicit fractional differential equations depending on boundary conditions of integral type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16417-16445. doi: 10.3934/math.2023839
    [7] Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Pushpendra Kumar, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18897-18924. doi: 10.3934/math.20221041
    [8] Abd-Allah Hyder, Mohamed A. Barakat, Doaa Rizk, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Study of HIV model via recent improved fractional differential and integral operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1656-1671. doi: 10.3934/math.2023084
    [9] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Imed Kedim . Analytical study of $ \mathcal{ABC} $-fractional pantograph implicit differential equation with respect to another function. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23635-23654. doi: 10.3934/math.20231202
    [10] Omar Choucha, Abdelkader Amara, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Delfim F. M. Torres, Thongchai Botmart . On the Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability of two structures of discrete fractional three-point boundary value problems: Existence theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1455-1474. doi: 10.3934/math.2023073
  • In this paper, a mathematical model of generalized fractional-order is constructed to study the problem of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of CD4+ T-cells with treatment. The model consists of a system of four nonlinear differential equations under the generalized Caputo fractional derivative sense. The existence results for the fractional-order HIV model are investigated via Banach's and Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative fixed point theorems. Further, we also established different types of Ulam's stability results for the proposed model. The effective numerical scheme so-called predictor-corrector algorithm has been employed to analyze the approximated solution and dynamical behavior of the model under consideration. It is worth noting that, unlike many discusses recently conducted, dimensional consistency has been taken into account during the fractionalization process of the classical model.



    The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a kind of retrovirus and it is the cause of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [1]. CD4+ T-cells are targeted of HIV, which are the most abundant white blood cells of the immune system and play a major role in protecting the body from infection. When HIV infection occurs, the virus attacks the CD4+ T-cells and tries to replicate itself. The process of infection completes is called the HIV life cycle [2], which carried out in five stages: Stage Ⅰ: (binding and fusion) when HIV is entering into the CD4+ T-cell, it is detected and bound by receptors at the cell membrane and then it has been fused, which allows HIV to enter inside the CD4+ T-cell. Stage Ⅱ: (reverse transcription) within the CD4+ T-cell, HIV releases and uses reverse transcriptase enzyme to convert its genetic material RNA to DNA, which allows HIV to enter the CD4+ T-cell nucleus. Stage Ⅲ: (integration and transcription) within the nucleus of CD4+ T-cell, HIV releases and uses integrase enzyme to integrate its viral DNA into DNA of the CD4+ T-cell, this is called proviral DNA. Afterward, the cell is motivated, it will turn on the transcription of the proviral DNA to produce the viral RNA and move out of the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Stage Ⅳ: (replication and assembly) within the cytoplasm, the viral RNA begins to use the machinery of the CD4+ T-cell to make long chains of HIV proteins, which are the building blocks for HIV replication. After that HIV protein and RNA move to the surface of the cell membrane and assemble into immature HIV. Stage Ⅴ: (budding) the immature HIV pushes itself out of the host cell and releases protease enzyme to split the long protein chains in the immature virus. Lastly, it becomes a mature virus which makes effects on other CD4+ T-cells. Antiretroviral therapy is the use of HIV medicines to treat HIV infection and to protect the immune system by blocking the virus from reproducing at different stages of the HIV life cycle for instances fusion inhibitors, reverse transcription inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors [3,4,5].

    Mathematical modeling and simulations were used as an essential instrument to forecast the possibility and severity of diseases and allow information to know its dynamic behavior of the infection. These models are useful tools and play a significant role to explain the dynamics of the immunological response to HIV infection, we refer readers to some books, see. [6,7,8]. Presenting some important previous works about the HIV model, researchers commonly used mathematical expressions in the form of differential equations to establish the relation between HIV viruses and uninfected CD4+ cells, and the effect of drug therapy on infected cells is described by mathematical models. In 1989, Perelson [9] initiated a simple model for the HIV infection and analyzed some dynamics behavior of the HIV infection of CD4+ T-cells in 1993 with his team [10]. In 2004, Tuckwell et al. [11] studied the dynamics behavior of solutions in the two-component model of the HIV infection model as follows:

    {dSdt=λkS(t)I(t)μ1S(t),dIdt=kS(t)I(t)μ2S(t), (1.1)

    where S is denoted the uninfected CD4+ T-cells, I is denoted the density of infected such cells, λ is constant rate, μ1 is their per capita death rate, μ2 is the rate of disappearance of infected cells, and k is infection rate. After three years, Rong et al. [12] developed a mathematical model of HIV model to predicate the initial constraints that shape the evolution of viral resistance to antiretroviral drugs in 2007 as:

    {dSdt=λkS(t)V(t)μ1S(t)+bI(t),dIdt=kV(t)S(t)(δ+b)S(t),dVdt=NδS(t)cV(t), (1.2)

    where they considered three compartments of CD4+ T-cells including concentration of uninfected (susceptible) cells S, infected cells I in eclipse phase, and free HIV virus particles in the blood cells V. Here denotes δ death rate of infected S cells and includes the possibility of death by bursting of infected S cells, hence δμ1. Further, the parameter b is the rate at which infected cells return to the uninfected class, while c is the death rate of the virus and N is the average number of viral particles produced by an infected cell, where k is the rate of infection.

    In 2009, Srivastava et al. [13] presented a primary infection model with reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor which takes place before the infected cell starts producing the virus. They studied the dynamics of the uninfected CD4+ T-cells, the virus population, and the infected CD4+ T-cells. They also distinguished the infected class of CD4+ T-cells into two subclasses: Pre-RT class which is the phase of the infected cells in which the reverse transcription is not completed and post-RT class which is the phase of those infected cells in which the reverse transcription is completed. The model of integer order is shown of the form:

    {dSdt=λkL(t)S(t)μ1S(t)+(ησ+b)I(t),dIdt=kL(t)S(t)(μ2+σ+b)I(t),dVdt=(1η)σI(t)ωV(t),dLdt=NωV(t)cL(t), (1.3)

    with the initial conditions (S(0),I(0),V(0),L(0))T=(S0,0,0,L0)T, where ()T represents the transpose operation, S, I, V and L are denoted the density of susceptible CD4+ T-cells, the density of infected CD4+ T-cells in pre-RT class, the density of infected CD4+ T-cells in post-RT class and the density of virus, respectively. The stability and numerical results are obtained in their work. The unknown parameters will be provide in the details in Section 3.

    The researchers used differential equations to applied in various areas to real-world problems. Since the theory of differential equations is well-known for applied researchers. It has popular in many fields and is working on different aspects of the mentioned area. In the last three centuries, various researchers developed fractional-order differential equations. It was extensively applied in various areas to real-world problems; see [14,15,16]. The well-known aspects that has been established recently are existence theory, stability analysis, numerical and optimization methods. The mathematician researchers introduced the different fractional derivatives that have been provided in fractional calculus. There are many types of research studies that have been created by using fractional derivatives and apply them to the HIV model. For examples; In 2009, Ding and Ye [17] studied the stability of equilibrium for a fractional HIV infection of CD4+ T-cells model and numerical simulations presented. In 2011, Ertürk et al. [18] discussed an approximated solution of a fractional HTLV-I infection of CD4+ T-cells model using a multi-step generalized differential transform method. In 2012, Arafa et al. [19] constructed and analyzed fractional modeling dynamics of HIV and CD4+ T-cells during primary infection. The generalized Euler method (GEM) used to find a numerical solution of this model. A few years later, Arafa et al. [20] studied and analyzed the behavior of solutions for a fractional-order model of HIV infection with CD4+ T-cells in Caputo sense by using the GEM. In 2017, Arshad et al. [21] analyzed the effects of the HIV infection model on CD4+ T-cell population based on a Caputo fractional derivative. By applying a finite difference approximation, the numerical scheme has been proposed. Khan et al. [22] established the stability results and numerical solutions of the fractional HIV/AIDS model in sense of an Atangana-Baleanu derivative operator. In 2019, Lichae et al. [23] studied an HIV-1 infection model of CD4+ T-cells with a description of the effect of antiviral drug treatment under a Caputo fractional derivative. The approximate solution has been gained by applying the Laplace transform and the Adomian decomposition method. Ferrari et al. [24] presented an HIV model under Caputo fractional derivative, which the presences of a reverse transcriptase inhibitor based on [13] is indicated. They proved the existence and uniqueness of the model and shown that the model is positive invariance. The equilibrium points and their stability of the model are also investigated. Recently, the qualitative theory has been interested and applied to mathematical models. For example, in 2020, Khan et al. [25] studied and analyzed the existence and stability results for the fractional order HIV-TB model with the Mittag-Leffler kernel. Further, numerical solutions are obtained. The HIV model under the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative is studied by Nazir et al. [26]. They obtained the existence criterias of the solutions by using fixed point theory. The stability of the concerned solution is also showed in the Hyers-Ulam sense. The approximate solution of the model is verified by using the technique of Laplace transform with the Adomian decomposition method. Abdeljawad et al. [27] studied the existence of solutions of the q-fractional difference equations with help of Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem and show the results by the Lotka-Volterra model. Abdeljawad and co-workers [28] applied the Banach fixed point theorem to prove existence results for the discrete fractional differences in sense of the discrete Mittage-Leffler kernel and numerical results were provided for the presence of the results. Khan et al. [29] discussed the existence of solutions and stability for the fractional-order advection-diffusion model in sense of the Mittag-Leffler kernel and shown the results numerically. Khan et al. [30] studied the time-fractional COVID-19 model with the help of the corrector-predictor method in the sense of a generalized Caputo fractional derivative [31]. The existence results are investigated by using Schauder's and Weissinger's fixed point theorems. Many papers have been developed under various types of fractional derivatives, see [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45] and references cited therein.

    Inspired by the mentioned discussion previously works in the HIV infection model with CD4+ T-cells, we consider the model [13] under the generalized Caputo fractional derivative [31]. The main aim of this research is to examine the existence and uniqueness of the solutions for the fractional HIV model via the famous fixed point theorems such as Banach's and Larey-Schauder's nonlinear alternative. Moreover, stability analysis in the context of various Ulam's stability is discussed. Finally, we use the predictor-corrector algorithm proposed by Erturk et al. [30] to find the approximate solutions of the fractional HIV model for various fractional derivative orders.

    This paper is organized as follows: Some preliminary facts, viral definitions, theoretical results, and descriptions of the fractional HIV model are presented in Section 2. In Section 3, we derive the relation between the Volterra integral equation and the proposed model. Also, with the help of these models, the existence and uniqueness of solutions are discussed by using the concepts of Banach's fixed point theorem and Larey-Schuader's nonlinear alternative. In Section 4, Ulam's stability of the proposed model in the frame of Ulam-Hyers, generalized Ulam-Hyers, Ulam-Hyers-Rassias, and generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias is provided. As an application, the general numerical scheme and numerical simulations illustrate the theoretical results in Section 5. Finally, the details of the conclusion have been completed in Section 6.

    This section gives some notations, basic definitions, and fundamental results of generalized fractional derivative and integral operators which are useful throughout this paper, see more details in [31,46,47].

    Definition 2.1. ([46]). The generalized fractional integral of the function f, ρIαa+, of order α>0 where ρ>0, is expressed (provided it exists) as:

    (ρIαa+f)(t)=1Γ(α)ta(tρsρρ)α1f(s)dss1ρ,t>a0, (2.1)

    and Γ() represents the Gamma function.

    Definition 2.2. ([47]). The generalized Riemann-type fractional derivative of the function f, ρDαa+, of order α>0 where ρ>0, is defined by

    (ρDαa+f)(t)=δn(ρInαa+f)(t)=δnΓ(nα)ta(tρsρρ)nα1f(s)dss1ρ,t>a0, (2.2)

    where δ=t1ρddt and n1<αn.

    Definition 2.3. ([47]). The generalized Caputo-type fractional derivative of a function f, ρCDαa+, of order α>0 where ρ>0, is defined by

    (ρCDαa+f)(t)=(ρDαa+[f(s)n1k=0δkf(a)k!(sρaρρ)k])(t),t>a0, (2.3)

    where n=[α]+1. In case of 0<α<1, we have

    (ρCDαa+f)(t)=(ρDαa+[f(s)f(a)])(t). (2.4)

    Definition 2.4. ([31]). The new generalized Caputo-type fractional derivative of a function f, CρDαa+, of order α>0 where ρ>0, is defined by

    (CρDαa+f)(t)=1Γ(nα)ta(tρsρρ)nα1(δnf)(s)dss1ρ,t>a0, (2.5)

    where n1<αn.

    Lemma 2.5. ([31]). Let fCn([a,b]), n1<αn and ρ>0. Then, for 0a<tb<, the following relation holds:

    (ρIαa+CρDαa+f)(t)=f(t)n1k=0(δkf)(a)k!(tρaρρ)k. (2.6)

    In particular, if 0<α1, we have

    (ρIαa+CρDαa+f)(t)=f(t)f(a).

    Lemma 2.6. (Banach fixed point theorem [48]). Let X be a Banach space, and D be a non-empty and closed subset of X. If the operator Q:DD is a contraction, then, Q has a fixed point in D.

    Lemma 2.7. (Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative [49]). Let X be a Banach space, C a closed, convex subset of X, U an open subset of C and 0U. Suppose that D:¯UC is a continuous, compact (that is, D(¯U) is a relatively compact subset of C) map. Then either (i) D has a fixed point in ¯U; or (ii) there is a xU (the boundary of U in C) and ν(0,1) with x=νD(x).

    This work is based on the HIV models proposed by [13,24], which are considered the antiretroviral therapy of reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor. The unknown variables could be considered in the model represent the following: S(t) is the density of susceptible CD4+ T-cells; I(t) is the density of infected CD4+ T-cells before reverse transcription (pre-RT class); V(t) is the density of infected CD4+ T-cells in which reverse transcription is completed (post-RT class) and so are capable of producing virus; L(t) is the virus density. Besides, the following positive parameters have been considered: λ is inflows rate of CD4+ T-cells; k is an interaction infection rate of CD4+ T-cells; μ1 is the natural death rate of CD4+ T-cells; η is the efficacy of RT inhibitor (η(0,1)); σ is transition rate of pre-RT class infected CD4+ T-cells to pose-RT class; b is reverting rate of infected cells to uninfected class due to non-completion of reverse transcription; μ2 is the death rate of infected CD4+ T-cells; ω is the death rate of actively infected CD4+ T-cells; N is the total number of viral particles produced by an infected CD4+ T-cells; c is the clearance rate of the virus.

    We study the HIV model infection with CD4+ T-cells (1.3) under the generalized Caputo fractional derivative [31] and the meaning of all parameters is shown in the previous section:

    {(CρDα0+S)(t)=λkL(t)S(t)μ1S(t)+(ησ+b)I(t),(CρDα0+I)(t)=kL(t)S(t)(μ2+σ+b)I(t),(CρDα0+V)(t)=(1η)σI(t)ωV(t),(CρDα0+L)(t)=NωV(t)cL(t), (2.7)

    where CρDα0+() is the generalized Caputo-type fractional derivative of order α with 0<α1 and ρ>0. We simplify the model (2.7) for easy description in the following setting:

    {(CρDα0+S)(t)=g1(t,S,I,V,L),(CρDα0+I)(t)=g2(t,S,I,V,L),(CρDα0+V)(t)=g3(t,S,I,V,L),(CρDα0+L)(t)=g4(t,S,I,V,L), (2.8)

    where the nonlinear functions g1g4 are given by

    {g1(t,S,I,V,L)=λkL(t)S(t)μ1S(t)+(ησ+b)I(t),g2(t,S,I,V,L)=kL(t)S(t)(μ2+σ+b)I(t),g3(t,S,I,V,L)=(1η)σI(t)ωV(t),g4(t,S,I,V,L)=NωV(t)cL(t), (2.9)

    with the initial conditions (S(0),I(0),V(0),L(0))T=(S0,I0,V0,L0)T.

    This section discusses the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the proposed model by helping fixed point theorems.

    Let E=C([0,T],R) denotes the Banach space of all continuous functions from [0,T] to R equipped with the norm defined by

    ξ=supt[0,T]|ξ(t)|,where|ξ(t)|=|S(t)|+|I(t)|+|V(t)|+|L(t)|,

    and S, I, V, LE. In view of Lemma 2.5, the model (2.7) can be written of the initial value problem

    {(CρDα0+ξ)(t)=G(t,ξ(t)),ξ(0)=ξ00, (3.1)

    which is equivalent to the Volterra integral equation

    ξ(t)=ξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρ, (3.2)

    where ξ(t)=(S(t),I(t),V(t),L(t))T with the initial conditions ξ(0)=(S0,I0,V0,L0)T, and G(t,ξ(t))=(gi(t,S,I,V,L))T for i=1,2,3,4.

    In view of the integral equation (3.2), an operator Q:EE defined by

    (Qξ)(t)=ξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρ. (3.3)

    It should be noticed that the problem (3.1) which is equivalent to the model (2.7) has solutions if and only if the operator Q has fixed points.

    Theorem 3.1. Assume that a function G:[0,T]R is continuous such that:

    (H1) there exists a constant LG>0 such that

    |G(t,ξ1(t))G(t,ξ2(t))|LG|ξ1(t)ξ2(t)|,

    for any ξ1, ξ2E and for all t[0,T].

    If

    LGTραραΓ(α+1)<1, (3.4)

    then the problem (3.1) has a unique solution on [0,T]. Consequently, the model (2.7) has a unique solution on [0,T].

    Proof. Early the proving, we convert the problem (3.1) into a fixed point problem, ξ=Qξ, where Q is given as in (3.3). Applying the Banach contraction principle, we show that Q has a unique fixed point, which is the unique solution of the problem (3.1).

    Let supt[0,T]|G(t,0)|=M1<. Setting Br1={ξE:ξr1} with

    r1ξ0+M1TραραΓ(α+1)1LGTραραΓ(α+1). (3.5)

    Note that Br1 is a bounded, closed, and convex subset of E.

    Step Ⅰ. We show that QBr1Br1.

    For any ξBr1, we have

    |(Qξ)(t)|ξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|G(s,ξ(s))|dss1ρξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1[|G(s,ξ(s))G(s,0)|+|G(s,0)|]dss1ρξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1dss1ρ(LGr1+M1)ξ0+TραραΓ(α+1)(LGr1+M1)r1,

    which implies that QBr1Br1.

    Step Ⅱ. We show that Q:Br1Br1 is a contraction.

    For any ξ1, ξ2E and each t[0,T], we have

    |(Qξ1)(t)(Qξ2)(t)|1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|G(s,ξ1(s))G(s,ξ2(s))|dss1ρLGΓ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|ξ1(t)ξ2(t)|dss1ρLGTραραΓ(α+1)ξ1ξ2, (3.6)

    which implies that Qξ1Qξ2[(LGTρα)/(ραΓ(α+1))]ξ1ξ2. As (LGTρα)/(ραΓ(α+1))<1, then the operator Q is a contraction. Hence, as a result of the Banach contraction principle (Lemma 2.6), the operator Q has a fixed point. Therefore, the problem (3.1) has a unique solution on [0,T]. Consequently, the model (2.7) has a unique solution on [0,T]. The proof is completed.

    The Leray-Schauder's nonlinear alternative (Lemma 2.7) is presented for our first existence result.

    Theorem 3.2. Assume that:

    (H2) there exists a function qC([0,T],R+) and a continuous nondecreasing function H:[0,)[0,) which is subhomogeneous (that is, H(μξ)μH(ξ), for all μ1 and ξE), such that

    |G(t,ξ(t))|q(t)H(|ξ(t)|)foreach(t,ξ)[0,T]×R,

    where q0=supt[0,T]{q(t)}.

    (H3) there exists a constant M2>0 such that

    M2ξ0+q0H(M2)TραραΓ(α+1)>1.

    Then, the problem (3.1) which is equivalent with the model (2.7) has at least one solution on [0,T].

    Proof. Let the operator Q be defined by (3.3). Firstly, we show that the operator Q maps bounded sets (balls) into bounded set in E. For a positive constant r2>0, let Br2={ξE:ξr2} be a bounded ball in E. From assumption (H2), for t[0,T], we have

    |(Qξ)(t)|ξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρξ0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|G(s,ξ(s))|dss1ρξ0+q0H(ξ)TραραΓ(α+1),

    which leads to

    Qξξ0+q0H(r2)TραραΓ(α+1).

    Secondly, we show that the operator Q maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of E. Let τ1,τ2[0,T] with τ1<τ2 and ξBr2. Then, we obtain

    |(Qξ)(τ2)(Qξ)(τ1)||1Γ(α)τ20(τρ2sρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρ1Γ(α)τ10(τρ1sρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρ|q0H(ξ)ραΓ(α+1)(|τρα2τρα1|+2|τρ2τρ1|α). (3.7)

    Clearly, which independent of ξBr2, the right hand side of the inequality (3.7) tends to zero as τ2τ1. Therefore, by the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem, Q:EE is completely continuous.

    Finally, we show that the boundedness of the set of all solutions to ξ=κQξ for κ(0,1). Let ξE be a solution. Then, for t[0,T], and following computation similar process to the first step, we get

    |ξ(t)|=|κ(Qξ)(t)|ξ0+q0H(ξ)TραραΓ(α+1).

    Taking the norm into the both sides of the above inequality, for t[0,T], which implies that

    ξξ0+q0H(ξ)TραραΓ(α+1)1.

    In view of (H3), there exists a constant M2>0 such that ξM2. Let us set K:={ξE:ξ<M2}.

    Note that the operator Q:¯KC is continuous and completely continuous. From the choice of ¯K, there is no ξK such that ξ=κQξ for some κ(0,1). Hence, by the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type (Lemma 2.7), we deduce that the operator Q has a fixed point ξ¯K which implies that the model (2.7) has at least one solution on [0,T]. The result is desired.

    In this section, we are developing some sufficient conditions under which the model (2.7) will satisfy the assumptions of the different types of Ulam's stability such as Ulam-Hyers stable, generalized Ulam-Hyers stable, Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable, and generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable.

    Before we state the Ulam's stability theorem, the following definitions are needed. Let ϵ>0 be a positive real number and ΦG:[0,T]R+ be a continuous function. We consider the following inequalities:

    |CρDα0+z(t)G(t,z(t))|ϵ,t[0,T], (4.1)
    |CρDα0+z(t)G(t,z(t))|ϵΦG(t),t[0,T], (4.2)
    |CρDα0+z(t)G(t,z(t))|ΦG(t),t[0,T], (4.3)

    where ϵ=max(ϵj)T for j=1,2,3,4.

    Definition 4.1. [50] The problem (3.1) is said to be Ulam-Hyers stable if there exists a constant CG>0 such that for every ϵ>0 and for each solution zE of the inequality (4.1) there exists a solution ξE of the problem (3.1) with

    |z(t)ξ(t)|CGϵ,t[0,T], (4.4)

    where CG=max(CGj)T for j=1,2,3,4.

    Definition 4.2. [50] The problem (3.1) is said to be generalized Ulam-Hyers stable if there exists a function ΦGC(R+,R+), with ΦG(0)=0 such that, for each solution zE of inequality (4.2), there exists a solution ξE of the problem (3.1) such that

    |z(t)ξ(t)|ΦG(ϵ),t[0,T], (4.5)

    where ΦG=max(ΦGj)T for j=1,2,3,4.

    Definition 4.3. [50] The problem (3.1) is said to be Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable with respect to ΦGC([0,T],R+) if there exists a real number MΦG>0 such that for each ϵ>0 and for each solution zE of the inequality (4.2) there exists a solution ξE of the problem (3.1) with

    |z(t)ξ(t)|MΦGϵΦG(t),t[0,T]. (4.6)

    Definition 4.4. [50] The problem (3.1) is said to be generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable with respect to ΦGC([0,T],R+) if there exists a real number MΦG>0 such that for each solution zE of the inequality (4.3), there exists a solution ξE of the problem (3.1) with

    |z(t)ξ(t)|MΦGΦG(t),t[0,T]. (4.7)

    Remark 4.5. It is clear that (i) Definition 4.1 Definition 4.2; (ii) Definition 4.3 Definition 4.4; (iii) Definition 4.3 for ΦG()=1 Definition 4.1.

    Remark 4.6. A function zE is a solution of the inequality (4.1) if and only if there exists a function wE (which depends on z) such that the following properties:

    (i) |w(t)|ϵ, w=max(wj)T, t[0,T].

    (ii) CρDα0+z(t)=G(t,z(t))+w(t), t[0,T].

    Remark 4.7. A function zE is a solution of the inequality (4.2) if and only if there exists a function vE (which depends on z) such that the following properties:

    (i) |v(t)|ϵΦG(t), v=max(vj)T, t[0,T].

    (ii) CρDα0+z(t)=G(t,z(t))+v(t), t[0,T].

    We demonstrate an important role that will be used in the proofs of Ulam-Hyers stability and generalized Ulam-Hyers stability.

    Lemma 4.8. Let α(0,1] and ρ>0. If zE is a solution of the inequality (4.1), then z is a solution of the following inequality

    |z(t)z01Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,z(s))dss1ρ|TραραΓ(α+1)ϵ. (4.8)

    Proof. Let z be a solution of the inequality (4.1). In view of Remark 4.6 (ii), we obtain

    {CρDα0+z(t)=G(t,z(t))+w(t),t[0,T],z(0)=z00. (4.9)

    Thus, the solution of the problem (4.9) can be written

    z(t)=z0+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,z(s))dss1ρ+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1w(s)dss1ρ.

    By applying Remark 4.6 (i),

    |z(t)z01Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,z(s))dss1ρ|1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|w(s)|dss1ρTραραΓ(α+1)ϵ.

    Therefore, the inequality (4.8) is achieved.

    Next, we investigate the Ulam-Hyers stability and generalized Ulam-Hyers stability results.

    Theorem 4.9. Assume that G:[0,T]×RR is continuous for every ξE. If (H1) and (3.4) are satisfied, then the problem (3.1) which is equivalent to the model (2.7) is Ulam-Hyers and, consequently, generalized Ulam-Hyers stable on [0,T].

    Proof. Suppose that ϵ>0 and let zE be any solution of the inequality (4.1). Let ξE be the unique solution of the problem (3.1),

    {CρDα0+ξ(t)=G(t,ξ(t)),t[0,T],ξ(0)=ξ0.

    By using (3.2) and Lemma 4.8 with the property of triangle inequality, we get

    |z(t)ξ(t)||z(t)ξ01Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,ξ(s))dss1ρ||z(t)z01Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,z(s))dss1ρ|+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|G(s,z(s))G(s,ξ(s))|dss1ρ|z(t)z01Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1G(s,z(s))dss1ρ|+LGΓ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|z(s)ξ(s)|dss1ρTραραΓ(α+1)ϵ+LGTραραΓ(α+1)|z(t)ξ(t)|.

    This implies that |z(t)ξ(t)|CGϵ, where

    CG=TραραΓ(α+1)1LGTραραΓ(α+1).

    Hence, the model (2.7) is Ulam-Hyers stable. Now, by setting ΦG(ϵ)=CGϵ such that ΦG(0)=0 yields that the model (2.7) is generalized Ulam-Hyers stable. The proof is completed.

    We assume that the following assumption:

    (H4) There exists an increasing function ΦGE and there exists λΦG>0, such that for any t[0,T], the following integral inequality

    ρIα0+ΦG(t)λΦGΦG(t). (4.10)

    Let us present an important lemma that will be used in the proofs of the Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability and generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability results.

    Lemma 4.10. Let α(0,1] and ρ>0. If zE is a solution of the inequality (4.2), then z is a solution of the following inequality

    |z(t)z0ρIα0+G(t,z(t))|ϵλΦGΦG(t). (4.11)

    Proof. Let z be a solution of the inequality (4.2). In view of Remark 4.7 (ii), we obtain

    {CρDα0+z(t)=G(t,z(t))+v(t),t[0,T],z(0)=z00. (4.12)

    Thus, the solution of the problem (4.12) can be written

    z(t)=z0+ρIα0+G(t,z(t))+ρIα0+v(t).

    By applying Remark 4.7 (i),

    |z(t)z0ρIα0+G(t,z(t))|ρIα0+|v(t)|ϵρIα0+ΦG(t)ϵλΦGΦG(t).

    Hence, the inequality (4.8) is achieved.

    In the last result, we are ready to prove the Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability and generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability results.

    Theorem 4.11. Assume that G:[0,T]×RR is continuous for every ξE. If (H1), (H3) and (3.4) are satisfied, then the problem (3.1) which is equivalent to the model (2.7) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias and, consequently, generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable on [0,T].

    Proof. Let ϵ>0 and zE be the solution of the inequality (4.3). Let ξE be the unique solution of the problem (3.1). By applying (3.2) and Lemma 4.10, we have

    |z(t)ξ(t)||z(t)ξ0ρIα0+G(t,ξ(t))||z(t)z0ρIα0+G(t,z(t))|+1Γ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|G(s,z(s))G(s,ξ(s))|dss1ρ|z(t)z0ρIα0+G(t,z(t))|+LGΓ(α)t0(tρsρρ)α1|z(s)ξ(s)|dss1ρϵλΦGΦG(t)+LGTραραΓ(α+1)|z(t)ξ(t)|,

    which implies that |z(t)ξ(t)|λΦG1LGTραραΓ(α+1)ϵΦG(t). By setting

    MΦG=λΦG1LGTραραΓ(α+1),

    we get the following inequality

    |z(t)ξ(t)|MΦGϵΦG(t). (4.13)

    Therefore, the model (2.7) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable. Moreover, if we set ϵ=1, in (4.13), with ΦG(0)=0, then the model (2.7) is generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable. The proof is completed.

    In this section, the fractional variant of the HIV model under consideration via the generalized Caputo fractional derivative is numerically simulated by using the predictor-corrector algorithm as proposed in [30].

    The first step of the algorithm, the interval [0,T] is divided into n unequal subintervals {[tk,tk+1],k=0,1,,n1} using the mesh points

    {t0=0,tk+1=(tρk+h)1/ρ,k=0,1,,n1,

    where h=Tρn. The approximate solutions of the HIV model (2.7) can be written as

    {Sk+1S(0)+ραhαΓ(α+2)kj=0aj,k+1g1(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj)+ραhαΓ(α+2)g1(tk+1,SPk+1,IPk+1,VPk+1,LPk+1),Ik+1I(0)+ραhαΓ(α+2)kj=0aj,k+1g2(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj)+ραhαΓ(α+2)g2(tk+1,SPk+1,IPk+1,VPk+1,LPk+1),Vk+1V(0)+ραhαΓ(α+2)kj=0aj,k+1g3(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj)+ραhαΓ(α+2)g3(tk+1,SPk+1,IPk+1,VPk+1,LPk+1),Lk+1L(0)+ραhαΓ(α+2)kj=0aj,k+1g4(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj)+ραhαΓ(α+2)g4(tk+1,SPk+1,IPk+1,VPk+1,LPk+1),

    where

    {SPk+1S(0)+ραhαΓ(α+1)kj=0[(k+1j)α(kj)α]g1(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj),IPk+1I(0)+ραhαΓ(α+1)kj=0[(k+1j)α(kj)α]g2(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj),VPk+1V(0)+ραhαΓ(α+1)kj=0[(k+1j)α(kj)α]g3(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj),LPk+1L(0)+ραhαΓ(α+1)kj=0[(k+1j)α(kj)α]g4(tj,Sj,Ij,Vj,Lj),

    and

    aj,k+1={kα(kα)(k+1)αifj=0,(kj+2)α+1+(kj)α+12(kj+1)α+1if1jk.

    According to the biological works of literature [13,24], we will consider the model's constant parameters and initial states as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Values of the parameters and initial states.
    Parameter Value Unit
    λ 10 mm3day1
    k 0.000024 mm3day1
    μ1 0.01 day1
    σ 0.4 day1
    b 0.05 day1
    μ2 0.015 day1
    ω 0.26 day1
    c 2.4 day1
    η 0.6 dimensionless
    N 1000 dimensionless
    S(0) 300 mm3
    I(0) 10 mm3
    V(0) 10 mm3
    L(0) 10 mm3

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    For the prediction of the epidemiology of the HIV model, we calculate the numerical solutions of the model (2.7) for various fractional orders, see illustrative Figures 1-4. All figures represent the comparison of the amount of susceptible CD4+ T-cells populations, the concentration of the infected CD4+ T-cells in pre-RT class, the concentration of the infected CD4+ T-cells in post-RT class, and the population of HIV virus, respectively, for the fractional orders α=1, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6 with ρ=0.97 and n=3000.

    Figure 1.  The density of S(t) for ρ=0.97 and n=3,000 with α=0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.
    Figure 2.  The density of I(t) for ρ=0.97 and n=3,000 with α=0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.
    Figure 3.  The density ofL(t) for ρ=0.97 and n=3,000 with α=0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.
    Figure 4.  The density of V(t) for ρ=0.97 and n=3,000 with α=0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.

    It can be easily seen that when the values of fractional orders α approach to 1, the solutions Sα(t) decrease to the integer order soluion S1(t)=S(t) of the classical model [13], see in Figure 1, but the solutions Iα(t),Vα(t) and Lα(t) also increase to the interger order solution I1(t)=I(t), V1(t)=V(t) and L1(t)=L(t), respectively, of the classical model [13] as see in Figures 2-4.

    The analysis of the mathematical model of HIV infections with antiretroviral therapy involving the generalized Caputo fractional derivative established in this paper. We showed that the solution of the considered model (2.7) exists and has at least one solution with the help of the Larey-Schauder nonlinear alternative and the unique solution proved by using Banach's fixed point theorem. The stability of the solution was examined by employing the various Ulam's stability such as Ulam-Hyers stable, generalized Ulam-Hyers stable, Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable, and generalized Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable. Further on using the predictor-corrector algorithm, we illustrated the approximate solutions for the different fractional-order α via the Matlab program and we concluded that the solutions of the considered model (2.7) tend to the standard solution when the fractional order α1. For further work, one can be developed and applied to the different types of fractional derivatives with the similar techniques in many real-world problems. We hope that this work would be a good alternative way for various researches.

    J. Kongson and C. Thaiprayoon would like to thank for funding this work through the Center of Excellence in Mathematics (CEM) and Burapha University. W. Sudsutad would like to thanks King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok for the support of this work.

    On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] G. Haas, A. Hosmalin, F. Hadida, J. Duntze, P. Debre, B. Autran, Dynamics of HIV variants and specific cytotoxic T-cell recognition in nonprogressors and progressors, Immunol. Lett., 56 (1997), 25–26. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(97)86936-2
    [2] F. Kirchhoff, Ⅳ life cycle: Overview, Encycl. AIDS, 2013 (2013), 1–9.
    [3] M. A. Nowak, S. Bonhoeffer, G. M. Shaw, R. M. May, Anti-viral drug treatment: Dynamics of resistance in free virus and infected cell populations, J. Theor. Biol., 184 (1997), 203–217. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0307
    [4] T. B. Kepler, A. S. Perelson, Drug concentration heterogeneity facilitates the evolution of drug resistance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95 (1998), 11514–11519. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11514
    [5] R. J. Smith, L. M. Wahl, Distinct effects of protease and reverse transcriptase inhibition in an immunological model of HIV-1 infection with impulsive drug effects, Bull. Math. Biol., 66 (2004), 1259–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.bulm.2003.12.004
    [6] M. Kot, Elements of Mathematical Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    [7] F. Brauer, C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology, New York: Springer, 2001.
    [8] M. A. Nowak, R. M. May, Virus Dynamics, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    [9] A. S. Perelson, Modeling the interaction of the immune system with HIV, In: C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical and Statistical Approaches to AIDS Epidemiology, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, New York: Springer, 1989.
    [10] A. S. Perelson, D. E. Kirschner, R. D. Boer, Dynamics of HIV infection of CD4+ T cells, Math. Biosci., 114 (1993), 81–125. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(93)90043-A
    [11] H. C. Tuckwell, F. Y. M. Wan, On the behavior of solutions in viral dynamical models, Biosystems, 73 (2004), 157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2003.11.004
    [12] L. Rong, M. A. Gilchrist, Z. Feng, A. S. Perelson, Modeling within host HIV-1 dynamics and the evolution of drug resistance: Trade offs between viral enzyme function and drug susceptibility, J. Theor. Biol., 247 (2007), 804–818. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.014
    [13] P. K. Srivastava, M. Banerjee, P. Chandra, Modeling the drug therapy for HIV infection, J. Biol. Sys., 17 (2009), 213–223. doi: 10.1142/S0218339009002764
    [14] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1993.
    [15] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999.
    [16] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2006.
    [17] Y. Ding, H. Ye, A fractional-order differential equation model of HIV infection of CD4+ T-cells, Math. Comput. Modell., 50 (2009), 386–392. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.04.019
    [18] V. S. Ertürk, Z. M. Odibat, S. Momani, An approximate solution of a fractional order differential equation model of human T-cell lymphotropic virus I (HTLV-I) infection of CD4+ T-cells, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 996–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.091
    [19] A. A. M. Arafa, S. Z. Rida, M. Khalil, Fractional modeling dynamics of HIV and CD4+ T-cells during primary infection, Nonlinear Biomed. Phys., 6 (2012), 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-6-1
    [20] A. A. M. Arafa, S. Z. Rida, M. Khalil, A fractional-order model of HIV infection with drug therapy effect, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 22 (2014), 538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.joems.2013.11.001
    [21] S. Arshad, D. Baleanu, W. Bu, Y. Tang, Effects of HIV infection on CD4+ T-cell population based on a fractional-order model, Adv. Differ. Equations, 92 (2017), 1–14.
    [22] A. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. S. Khan, H. Khan, Stability analysis and numerical solutions of fractional order HIV/AIDS model, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 221 (2019), 119–128.
    [23] B. H. Lichae, J. Biazar, Z. Ayati, The fractional differential model of HIV-1 Infection of CD4+ T-cells with description of the effect of antiviral drug treatment, Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2019 (2019), 4059549.
    [24] A. J. Ferrari, E. A. Santillan Marcus, Study of a fractional-order model for HIV infection of CD4+ T-Cells with treatment, J. Frational Calculus Appl., 11 (2020), 12–22.
    [25] H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A. Alkhazzan, A. Khan, A fractional order HIV-TB coinfection model with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler Law, Math. Methods Appl Sci., 43 (2020), 3786–3806. doi: 10.1002/mma.6155
    [26] G. Nazir, K. Shah, A. Debbouche, R. A. Khan, Study of HIV mathematical model under nonsingular kernel type derivative of fractional order, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 139 (2020), 1–8.
    [27] T. Abdeljawad, J. Alzabut, H. Zhou, A Krasnoselskii existence result for nonlinear delay Caputo q-fractional difference equations with applications to Lotka-Volterra competition model, Appl. Math. E-Notes, 17 (2017), 307–318.
    [28] T. Abdeljawad, Q. M. Al-Mdallal, Discrete Mittag-Leffler kernel type fractional difference initial value problems and Gronwall's inequality, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 339 (2018), 218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.10.021
    [29] H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A. Khan, T. S. Khan, Stability analysis for fractional order advection-reaction diffusion system, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl., 521 (2019), 737–751. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.102
    [30] V. S. Ertürk, P. Kumar, Solution of a COVID-19 model via new generalized Caputo-type fractional derivatives, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 139 (2020), 1–9.
    [31] Z. Odibat, D. Baleanu, Numerical simulation of initial value problems with generalized Caputo-type fractional derivatives, Appl. Numer. Math., 156 (2020), 94–105. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2020.04.015
    [32] X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, The uniqueness of positive solution for a fractional order model of turbulent flow in a porous medium, Appl. Math. Lett., 37 (2014), 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.05.002
    [33] E. Bonyah, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A. Adu, Stability analysis and optimal control of a fractional human african trypanosomiasis model, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 117 (2018), 150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.025
    [34] I. Koca, Modelling the spread of ebola virus with atangana-baleanu fractional operators, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 1–14. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11804-8
    [35] B. Ghanbaria, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Modeling the dynamics of nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton system with variable-order fractional derivatives, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 116 (2018), 114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.026
    [36] J. Singha, D. Kumara, Z. Hammouchb, A. Atangana, A fractional epidemiological model for computer viruses pertaining to a new fractional derivative, Appl. Math. Comput., 316 (2018), 504–515.
    [37] H. Khan, Y. Li, A. Khan, Existence of solution for a fractional-order lotka-volterra reaction-diffusion model with mittag-leffler kernel, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 3377–3387. doi: 10.1002/mma.5590
    [38] M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, M. Farhan, The dynamics of Zika virus with Caputo fractional derivative, AIMS Math., 4 (2019), 134–146. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.134
    [39] A. Khan, T. Abdeljawada, J. F. Gómez-Aguilard, H. Khane, Dynamical study of fractional order mutualism parasitism food web module, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 134 (2020), 109685. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109685
    [40] D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with caputo-fabrizio fractional derivative, Chaos Soliton Fractals, 134 (2020), 109705. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705
    [41] M. Moustafa1, M. H. Mohd, A. I. Ismail, F. A. Abdullah, Dynamical analysis of a fractional order eco-epidemiological model with nonlinear incidence rate and prey refuge, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 65 (2021), 623–650. doi: 10.1007/s12190-020-01408-6
    [42] E. Uçara, N. Özdemir, A fractional model of cancer-immune system with Caputo and Caputo–Fabrizio derivatives, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 1–17. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-01001-7
    [43] Z. Ali, F. Rabiei, K. Shah, T. Khodadadi, Qualitative analysis of fractal-fractional order COVID-19 mathematical model with case study of Wuhan, Alexandria Eng. J., 60 (2021), 477–489. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.020
    [44] A. Khan, H. M. Alshehri, T. Abdeljawada, Q. M. Al-Mdallale, H. Khan, Stability analysis of fractional nabla difference COVID-19 model, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103888. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103888
    [45] M. U. Rahman, M. Arfan, Z. Shah, P. Kumam, M. Shutaywi, Nonlinear fractional mathematical model of tuberculosis (TB) disease with incomplete treatment under Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Alexandria Eng. J., 60 (2021), 2845–2856. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.015
    [46] U. N. Katugampola, New approach to generalized fractional integral, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 860–865.
    [47] U. N. Katugampola, A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives, Bul. Math. Anal. Appl., 6 (2014), 1–15.
    [48] K. Deimling, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
    [49] G. Andrzej, D. James, Fixed Point Theory, New York: Springer, 2003.
    [50] I. A. Rus, Ulam stabilities of ordinary differential equations in a Banach space, Carpathian J. Math., 26 (2010), 103–107.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Apichat Neamvonk, Jehad Alzabut, Weerawat Sudsutad, Investigation of fractal-fractional HIV infection by evaluating the drug therapy effect in the Atangana-Baleanu sense, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 10762, 10.3934/mbe.2022504
    2. Areej A. Almoneef, Mohamed A. Barakat, Abd-Allah Hyder, Analysis of the Fractional HIV Model under Proportional Hadamard-Caputo Operators, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 220, 10.3390/fractalfract7030220
    3. Abd-Allah Hyder, Mohamed A. Barakat, Doaa Rizk, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Study of HIV model via recent improved fractional differential and integral operators, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 1656, 10.3934/math.2023084
    4. Shah Hussain, Elissa Nadia Madi, Hasib Khan, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Nichaphat Patanarapeelert, Investigation of the Stochastic Modeling of COVID-19 with Environmental Noise from the Analytical and Numerical Point of View, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 3122, 10.3390/math9233122
    5. M. R. Doostdar, A. R. Vahidi, T. Damercheli, E. Babolian, A numerical method based on hybrid functions for solving a fractional model of HIV infection of CD4+
    T cells, 2022, 2008-1359, 10.1007/s40096-021-00450-0
    6. Rubayyi T. Alqahtani, Shabir Ahmad, Ali Akgül, Dynamical Analysis of Bio-Ethanol Production Model under Generalized Nonlocal Operator in Caputo Sense, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 2370, 10.3390/math9192370
    7. Shaista Gul, Rahmat Ali Khan, Hasib Khan, Reny George, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Analysis on a coupled system of two sequential hybrid BVPs with numerical simulations to a model of typhoid treatment, 2022, 61, 11100168, 10085, 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020
    8. Jutarat Kongson, Weerawat Sudsutad, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jehad Alzabut, Chutarat Tearnbucha, On analysis of a nonlinear fractional system for social media addiction involving Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo derivative, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03515-5
    9. M. A. Barakat, Abd-Allah Hyder, Areej A. Almoneef, A novel HIV model through fractional enlarged integral and differential operators, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-34280-y
    10. Stanca M. Ciupe, Jessica M. Conway, Incorporating Intracellular Processes in Virus Dynamics Models, 2024, 12, 2076-2607, 900, 10.3390/microorganisms12050900
    11. Sana Abdulkream Alharbi, Nada A. Almuallem, Computational Study of a Fractional-Order HIV Epidemic Model with Latent Phase and Treatment, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 28, 10.3390/fractalfract9010028
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2942) PDF downloads(160) Cited by(11)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog