Research article

Semi-compatible mappings and common fixed point theorems of an implicit relation via inverse Cclass functions

  • Received: 25 October 2020 Accepted: 17 December 2020 Published: 29 December 2020
  • MSC : 47H10, 54H25

  • In this paper, we prove some common fixed point theorems by exploring a new kind of generalized semi-compatibility and an implicit relation via inverse Cclass functions. The results generalize, extend and improve the main results of [19, 21, 22, 23]. Moreover, some examples are given to illustrate the validity of our results.

    Citation: Mi Zhou, Mukesh Kumar Jain, Mohammad Saeed Khan, Nicolae Adrian Secelean. Semi-compatible mappings and common fixed point theorems of an implicit relation via inverse Cclass functions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2636-2652. doi: 10.3934/math.2021160

    Related Papers:

    [1] M. Emin Özdemir, Saad I. Butt, Bahtiyar Bayraktar, Jamshed Nasir . Several integral inequalities for (α, s,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3906-3921. doi: 10.3934/math.2020253
    [2] Tekin Toplu, Mahir Kadakal, İmdat İşcan . On n-Polynomial convexity and some related inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1304-1318. doi: 10.3934/math.2020089
    [3] Haoliang Fu, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Mamoona Ghafoor, Peigen Li . On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial convex stochastic processes. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6322-6339. doi: 10.3934/math.2021371
    [4] Muhammad Samraiz, Kanwal Saeed, Saima Naheed, Gauhar Rahman, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type via n-polynomial exponential type s-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14282-14298. doi: 10.3934/math.2022787
    [5] Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu . New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441
    [6] Hong Yang, Shahid Qaisar, Arslan Munir, Muhammad Naeem . New inequalities via Caputo-Fabrizio integral operator with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19391-19412. doi: 10.3934/math.2023989
    [7] Saad Ihsan Butt, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Muhammad Nadeem, Nabil Mlaiki, İşcan İmdat, Thabet Abdeljawad . (m,n)-Harmonically polynomial convex functions and some Hadamard type inequalities on the co-ordinates. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4677-4690. doi: 10.3934/math.2021275
    [8] Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Nadeem, Maria Alessandra Ragusa . Some new integral inequalities for a general variant of polynomial convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20461-20489. doi: 10.3934/math.20221121
    [9] Gültekin Tınaztepe, Sevda Sezer, Zeynep Eken, Sinem Sezer Evcan . The Ostrowski inequality for s-convex functions in the third sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5605-5615. doi: 10.3934/math.2022310
    [10] Moquddsa Zahra, Dina Abuzaid, Ghulam Farid, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On Hadamard inequalities for refined convex functions via strictly monotone functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20043-20057. doi: 10.3934/math.20221096
  • In this paper, we prove some common fixed point theorems by exploring a new kind of generalized semi-compatibility and an implicit relation via inverse Cclass functions. The results generalize, extend and improve the main results of [19, 21, 22, 23]. Moreover, some examples are given to illustrate the validity of our results.



    In recent years, convexity theory has gained special attention by many researchers because of it engrossing properties and expedient characterizations. It has many applications in fields like biology, numerical analysis and statistics (see [1,2,3,4]). Mathematical inequalities are extensively studied with all type of convex functions (see[1,3,11,13,14,16]). One of the fundamental inequality is Hermite-Hadamard inequality. It has been discussed via different types of convexities and became the center of attention for many researchers. Recently, in 2016, Khan et al. have discussed generalizations of Hermite-Hadamard type for MT-convex functions [26]. In 2017, Khan et al. studied some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard types [27]. In 2019, Khurshid et al. have utilized conformable fractional integrals via preinvex functions [28]. In 2020, Khan et al. have discussed Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities via quantum calculus involving green function [29], Mohammed et al. have established a new version of Hermite-Hadamard inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals [30], Han et al. used fractional integral to generalize Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex functions [31], Zhao et al. utilized harmonically convex functions to generalized fractional integral inequalities of Hermite-Hdamrd type [32], Awan et al. presented new inequalities of Hermite-Hdamard type for n-polynomial harmonically convex functions [33]. In 2022, Khan et al. introduced some new versions of Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities in fuzzy fractional calculus for generalized pre-invex functions via fuzzy-interval-valued settings [34]. This reflects the importance of Hermite Hadamard type inequalities among current research.

    In [9], s-convex function is given as,

    Definition 1.1. A real valued function χ is called s-convex function on R, if

    χ(ςρ+(1ς)γ)ςsχ(ρ)+(1ς)sχ(γ),

    for each ρ,γR and ς(0,1) where s(0,1].

    In [10], m-convexity is discussed as,

    Definition 1.2. A real valued function χ defined on [0,b] is said to be a m-convex function for m[0,1], if

    χ(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)ςχ(ρ)+m(1ς)χ(γ),

    holds for all ρ,γ[0,b] and ς[0,1].

    (s,m)-convexity in [17] is discussed as,

    Definition 1.3. A function χ:[0,b]R, b>0 is said to be a (s,m)-convex function in the second sense where s,m(0,1]2, if

    χ(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)ςsχ(ρ)+m(1ς)sχ(γ),

    holds provided that all ρ,γ[0,b] and ς[0,1].

    Equivalent definition for (s,m)–convex functions:

    Let ρ,α,γ[0,b], ρ<α<γ

    χ(α)(γαγρ)sχ(ρ)+m(αργρ)sχ(γ). (1.1)

    Hölder-İşcan Inequality [5]:

    Let p>1, χ and ψ be real valued functions defined on [ρ,γ] and |χ|p,|ψ|q are integrable functions on interval [ρ,γ]

    γρ|χ(ω)ψ(ω)|dω1γρ(γρ(γω)|χ(ω)|pdω)1p(γρ(γω)|ψ(ω)|qdω)1q+1γρ(γρ(ωρ)|χ(ω)|pdω)1p(γρ(ωρ)|ψ(ω)|qdω)1q, (1.2)

    where 1p+1q=1.

    Following lemma is useful to obtain our main results.

    Lemma 1.4. [8] For nN, let χ:URR be n-times differentiable mapping on U, where ρ,γU, ρ<γ and χnL[ρ,γ], we have following identity

    n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω=(1)n+1n!γρωnχ(n)(ω)dω, (1.3)

    where an empty set is understood to be nil.

    In this paper, Hölder-İşcan inequality is used to modify inequalities involving functions having s-convex or s-concave derivatives at certain powers. The purpose of this paper is to establish some generalized inequalities for n-times differentiable (s,m)-convex functions. Applications of these inequalities to means are also discussed. Means are defined as,

    Let 0<ρ<γ,

    A(ρ,γ)=ρ+γ2,
    G(ρ,γ)=ργ,
    Lp(ρ,γ)=(γp+1ρp+1(p+1)(γρ))1p,

    where p0,1 and ργ.

    Theorem 2.1. For any positive integer n, let χ:U(0,)R be n-times differentiable mapping on U, where ρ,γU with ρ<γ. If χ(n)L[ρ,γ] and |χ(n)|q for q>1 is (s,m)-convex on interval [ρ,γ] then

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)μρχ(ω)dω|1n!(γρ)1q([γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)(s+1)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+2)]1q+[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+1)(s+2)]1q), (2.1)

    where 1p+1q=1.

    Proof. Since |χn|q is (s,m)-convex by using inequality (1.1) for ρ<ω<γ, using Lemma 1.4 and Hölder-Işcan inequality (1.2),

    |χn(ω)|q|χn(ωργργ+mγωγρρ)|q(ωργρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γωγρ)s|χn(ρ)|q,|n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω|1n!γρωn|χ(n)(ω)|dω,1n!1γρ{(γρ(γω)ωnpdω)1p(γρ(γω)|χ(n)(ω)|qdω)1q+(γρ(ωρ)ωnpdω)1p(γρ(ωρ)|χ(n)(ω)|qdω)1q},1n!1γρ(γρ(γω)ωnpdω)1p(γρ(γω)[(ωργρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γωγρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dω)1q+1n!1γρ(γρ(ωρ)ωnpdω)1p(γρ(ωρ)[(ωργρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γωγρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dω)1q, (2.2)

    Let

    I1=[γρ(γω)ωnpdω]1p=[γρ(γωnpωnp+1)dω]1p=(γρ)1p[γ(γnp+1ρnp+1(γρ)(np+1))(γnp+2ρnp+2(γρ)(np+2))]1p=(γρ)1p[γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p,
    I2=[γρ(ωρ)ωnpdt]1p=[γρ(ωnp+1ρωnp)dω]1p=(γρ)1p[(γnp+2ρnp+2(γρ)(np+2))ρ(γnp+1ρnp+1(γρ)(np+1))]1p=(γρ)1p[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p,
    I3=γρ(γω)(ωρ)sdω=(γω)(ωρ)s+1s+1|γρ+γρ(ωρ)s+1s+1dω=(γρ)s+2(s+1)(s+2),
    I4=γρ(γω)s+1dω=(γρ)s+2s+2,I5=γρ(ωρ)s+1dω=(γρ)s+2s+2,I6=γρ(ωρ)(γω)sdω=(ωρ)(γω)s+1(s+1)|γρ+γρ(γω)s+1(s+1)dω=(γρ)s+2(s+1)(s+2).

    Substituting integrals I1,I2,I3,I4,I5,I6 in inequality (2.2) we have,

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω|1n!(γρ)((γρ)1p[γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p[(γρ)2(|χn(γ)|q(s+2)(s+1)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+2))]1q+(γρ)1p[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p[(γρ)2(|χn(γ)|q(s+2)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+1)(s+2))]1q)
    =(γρ)1p1+2qn!([γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)(s+1)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+2)]1q+[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+1)(s+2)]1q)
    =1n!(γρ)1q([γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)(s+1)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+2)]1q+[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p[|χn(γ)|q(s+2)+m|χn(ρ)|q(s+1)(s+2)]1q).

    which is required inequality (2.1).

    For n=1 inequality (2.1) becomes,

    |(χ(γ)γχ(ρ)ργρ)1γργρχ(ω)dω|(γρ)1q1([γLpp(ρ,γ)Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)]1p[|χ(γ)|q(s+1)(s+2)+m|χ(ρ)|(s+2)q]1q+[Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)ρLpp(ρ,γ)]1p[m|χ(ρ)|q(s+1)(s+2)+|χ(γ)|(s+2)q]1q). (2.3)

    Remark 2.2. For s=1 and m=1 our resulting inequality (2.1) becomes the inequality (2) of [5].

    Theorem 2.3. For nN, let χ:U(0,)R be n-times differentiable mapping on U, where, ρ,γU, ρ<γ, χ(n)L[ρ,γ] and |χ(n)|q for q>1, is (s,m)-convex on interval [ρ,γ] then following inequality holds

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω|1s1qn!(12)1p(γρ)2p1((|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2γLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q+(|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2ρLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q). (2.4)

    Proof. Since |χ(n)|q for q>1 is (s,m)-convex on [ρ,γ], by using Lemma 1.4 and Hölder-İşcan inequality (1.2), since s(0,1], this fact can be used for ω,ρ,γU(0,),

    (ωρ)s<(ωρ)s,(γω)s<(γω)s|n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω|1n!γρ1.ωn|χ(n)(ω)|dω,1n!1(γρ)([(γρ(γω)dω)1p(γρ(γω)ωnq|χ(n)(ω)|qdω)1q]+[(γρ(ωρ)dω)1p(γρ(ωρ)ωnq|χ(n)(ω)|qdω)1q]),1n!1(γρ)(γρ(γω)dω)1p(γρ(γω)ωnq[(ωργρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γωγρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dt)1q+1n!1(γρ)(γρ(ωρ)dt)1p(γρ(ωρ)ωnq[(ωργρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γωγρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dx)1q,1s1qn!1(γρ)(γρ(γω)dω)1p(γρ(γω)ωnq[(ωρ)(γρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γω)(γρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dω)1q+1s1qn!1(γρ)(γρ(ωρ)dω)1p(γρ(ωρ)ωnq[(ωρ)(γρ)s|χn(γ)|q+m(γω)(γρ)s|χn(ρ)|q]dω)1q,    I1=γρ(γω)dω=(γρ)22    I2=γρ(γω)(ωρ)ωnqdω=γωnq+1nq+1ργωnq+1nq+1ωnq+3nq+3+ρωnq+2nq+2|γρ    =(γnq+3ρnq+3nq+3)+ρ(γnq+2ρnq+2nq+2)+γ(γnq+2ρnq+2nq+2)ργ(γnq+1ρnq+1nq+1)    =(γρ)[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)],        I3=γρ(γω)2ωnqdω=γ2ωnq+1nq+1+ωnq+3nq+32γωnq+2nq+2|γρ        =(γnq+3ρnq+3nq+3)2γ(γnq+2ρnq+2nq+2)+γ2(γnq+1ρnq+1nq+1)        =(γρ)[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2γLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)],        I4=γρ(ωρ)2ωnqdω=ωnq+3nq+3+ρ2ωnq+1nq+12ρωnq+2nq+2|γρ        =(γnq+3ρnq+3nq+3)+ρ2(γnq+1ρnq+1nq+1)2ρ(γnq+2ρnq+2nq+2)        =(γρ)[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)2ρLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)]. (2.5)

    Substituting integrals I1,I2,I3,I4,I5,I6 in inequality (2.5) we have,

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γρχ(ω)dω|1s1qn!(12)1p(γρ)2p1×((|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s[(γρ)(Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ))]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s[(γρ)(Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2γLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ))])1q+(|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s[(γρ)(Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2ρLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ))]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s[(γρ)(Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ))])1q),
    =1s1qn!(12)1p(γρ)2p1×((|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2γLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q+(|χ(n)(γ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2ρLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(n)(ρ)|q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q).

    For n=1, Theorem2.3 reduced to the inequality

    |γχ(γ)ρχ(ρ)(γρ)1(γρ)γρχ(ω)dω|1s1q(12)1p(γρ)2p2((|χ(1)(γ)|q(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(1)(ρ)|(γρ)s1q[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2γLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lqq(ρ,γ)])1q+(|χ(1)(γ)|(γρ)s1q[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2ρLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lqq(ρ,γ)]+m|χ(1)(ρ)|(γρ)s1q[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)])1q). (2.6)

    Remark 2.4. For s=1 and m=1 our resulting inequality (2.4) becomes the inequality (6) of [5].

    Theorem 2.5. If function χ:[0,b]R, b>0 is a (s, m)-convex function in the second sense where (s,m)(0,1]2, holds provided that all ρ,γ[0,b] and ς[0,1], then

    2sχ(ρ+mγ2)[1mγρmγρχ(ω)dω+m2mγργρmχ(l)dl]χ(ρ)+mχ(γ)s+1+χ(γ)+mχ(ρm2)s+1. (2.7)

    Proof. A function χ:[0,b]R, b>0 is said to be a (s,m)-convex function in the second sense where s,m(0,1]2, if

    χ(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)ςsχ(ρ)+m(1ς)sχ(γ),

    holds provided that all ρ,γ[0,b] and ς[0,1].

    Integrating w.r.t ς on [0,1],

    10χ(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)dς10ςsχ(ρ)dς+10m(1ς)sχ(γ)dς,=ςs+1s+1|10χ(ρ)mχ(γ)(1ς)s+1s+1|10=χ(ρ)+mχ(γ)s+1.      10χ(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)dςχ(ρ)+mχ(γ)s+1. (2.8)

    and

    χ(ςγ+m(1ς)ρm2)ςsχ(γ)+m(1ς)sχ(ρm2),10χ(ςγ+m(1ς)ρm2)dςχ(γ)+mχ(ρm2)s+1. (2.9)

    As χ is (s,m)-convex,

    χ(ρ+mγ2)=χ(ςρ+(1ς)mγ2+m.(1ς)ρm+ςγ2)(12)sχ(ςρ+(1ς)γm)+m(12)sχ(ςγ+(1ς)ρm),

    Integrating w.r.t ς over [0,1] and by using (2.8) and (2.9) we get,

    2sχ(ρ+mγ2)10(χ(ςρ+(1ς)γm)dς+m10χ(ςγ+(1ς)ρm)dςχ(ρ)+mχ(γ)s+1+χ(γ)+mχ(ρm2)s+1. (2.10)

    Substituting in first integral,

    ςρ+(1ς)γm=ω,

    10χ(ςρ+(1ς)mγ)dς=1γmργmρχ(ω)dω. (2.11)

    Substituting in the second integral,

    ςγ+(1ς)ρm=l,

    10χ(ςγ+(1ς)ρm)dς=mγmργρmχ(l)dl, (2.12)

    Using (2.11) and (2.12) in (2.10) required inequality (2.7) obtained.

    Remark 2.6. For s,m=1 inequality (2.7) becomes classical Hadamard inequality for convex functions.

    Theorem 2.7. For nN, let χ:U(0,)R be n-times differentiable mapping on U, where, ρ,γU, ρ<γ and χ(n)L[ρ,γ] and |χ(n)|q for q>1 is (s, m)-concave on interval [ρ,mγ], then

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)mγρχ(ω)dω|2sq(mγρ)1q|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|n!((γLnpnp(ρ,mγ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,mγ))1p+(Lnp+1np+1(ρ,mγ)ρLnpnp(ρ,mγ))1p). (2.13)

    Proof. |χ(n)|q for q>1 is (s,m)-concave then by using Theorem 2.5 we have,

    |χ(n)(ρ)|q+m|χ(n)(γ)|qs+1+|χ(n)(γ)|q+m|χ(n)(ρm2)|qs+1m2(mγρ)γρm|χ(n)(l)|qdl1(mγρ)mγρ|χ(n)(ω)|qdω2s|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q,
    mγρ|χ(n)(ω)|qdω2s(mγρ)|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q,
    1(mγρ)γmρ(γω)|χ(n)(ω)|qdωγmρ|χ(n)(ω)|qdω2s(mγρ)|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q,
    1(mγρ)γmρ(γω)|χ(n)(ω)|qdωγmρ|χ(n)(ω)|qdω2s(mγρ)|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q.

    Using Lemma 1.4 and Hölder-Îşcan inequality (1.2),

    |n1ν=0(1)ν(χ(ν)(γ)γν+1χ(ν)(ρ)ρν+1(ν+1)!)γmρχ(ω)dω|1n!γmρωn|χ(n)(ω)|dω,      1n!1γρ{(γmρ(γω)ωnpdω)1p(mγρ(γω)|χn(ω)|qdω)1q+(γmρ(ωρ)ωnpdω)1p(mγρ(ωρ)|χn(ω)|qdω)1q},      1n!1γρ((γmρ(γω)ωnpdω)1p(2s(mγρ)2|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q)1q+(γmρ(ωρ)ωnpdω)1p(2s(mγρ)2|χ(n)(ρ+mγ2)|q)1q),            I1=(γmρ(γω)ωnpdω)1p=(γωnp+1np+1|γmρωnp+2np+2|γmρ)1p            =(mγρ)1p(γLnpnp(ρ,mγ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,mγ))1p,            I2=(γmρ(ωρ)ωnpdω)1p=(ωnp+2np+2|γmρρωnp+1np+1|γmρ)1p            =(mγρ)1p(Lnp+1np+1(ρ,mγ)ρLnpnp(ρ,mγ))1p. (2.14)

    Substituting integrals I1,I2 in inequality (2.14) required inequality (2.13) is obtained.

    For n=1 inequality (2.13) becomes,

    |χ(γ)γρχ(ρ)(γρ)1(γρ)γmρχ(ω)dω|2sq(mγρ)1q|χ(1)(ρ+γ2)|1!((γLpp(ρ,mγ)Lp+1p+1(ρ,mγ))1p+(Lp+1p+1(ρ,mγ)ρLpp(ρ,mγ))1p). (2.15)

    Remark 2.8. For s=1 and m=1 our resulting inequality becomes the inequality obtained in Theorem 4 of [5].

    Proposition 2.9. Let ρ,γ(0,), where ρ<γ, q>1, n,iN with in,

    |Lii(ρ,γ)[(i+1)n1ν=0(1)νP(i,ν)(ν+1)!1]|1n!(γρ)1q1×([γLnpnp(ρ,γ)Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)]1p(γ(in)q(s+1)(s+2)+mρ(in)q(s+2))1q+[Lnp+1np+1(ρ,γ)ρLnpnp(ρ,γ)]1p(mρ(in)q(s+1)(s+2)+γ(in)q(s+2))1q), (2.16)

    where

    P(i,n)={i(i1)...(in+1),i>nn!,i=n1,n=0}.

    Proof. Let

    χ(ω)=ωi,|χ(n)(ω)|q=|P(i,n)ωin|q

    Let

    g(ς)=|P(i,n)(ςρ+m(1ς)γ|(in)q|P(i,n)ςsρ|(in)q|mP(i,n)(1ς)sγ|(in)q,
    g(ς)=P(i,n)((in)q)((in)q1)(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)(in)q2(ρmγ)2s(s1)ςs2P(i,n)ρ(in)qms(s1)(1ς)s2P(i,n)γ(in)q,

    g(ς)0 means g is convex and g(1)=g(0)=0, which omplies g0, hence

    |P(i,n)(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)|(in)q|P(i,n)ςsρ|(in)q+|mP(i,n)(1ς)sγ)|(in)q.

    By using Theorem 2.1 for |χn(ω)|q which is (s,m)–convex for s,m(0,1]2 inequality (2.16) obtained.

    Remark 2.10. For s,m=1 inequality (2.16) becomes inequality (3) of [5].

    Example 2.11. Taking i=2, n=1, p=q=2 in Proposition 2.9, the following is valid:

    2A(ρ2,γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)(326)([A(3ρ2,γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]12(γ2(s+1)(s+2)+mρ2(s+2))12+[A(ρ2,3γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]12(mρ2(s+1)(s+2)+γ2(s+2))12),

    where A and G are classical arithmetic and geometric means, respectively.

    Proposition 2.12. Let ρ,γ(0,), with, ρ<γ, q>1 and nN,

    1(γρ)1q1([γLpp(ρ,γ)Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)]1p[(γq(s+1)(s+2)+mρq(s+2))]1q+[Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)ρLpp(ρ,γ)]1p[(mρq(s+1)(s+2)+γq(s+2))]1q), (2.17)

    where L is classical logarithmic mean.

    Proof.

    χ(ω)=lnω,|χ(1)(ω)|q=|ω1|q

    Let

    g(ς)=|(ςρ+m(1ς)γ|q|ςsρ|q|m(1ς)sγ|q
    g(ς)=(q)(q1)(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)q2(ρmγ)2s(s1)ςs2ρqms(s1)(1ς)s2γq,

    g(ς)0 means g is convex and g(1)=g(0)=0 which implies g0 as

    |(ςρ+m(1ς)γ|q|ςsρ|q+|m(1ς)sγ|q.

    So |χ(1)(ω)|q is (s,m)-convex. Then by using inequality (2.3) required inequality (2.17) obtained.

    Remark 2.13. For s,m=1 inequality (2.17) becomes (4) of [5].

    Example 2.14. For n=1 and p=q=2, Proposition 2.12 gives:

    116([A(3ρ2,γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]1p[(γ2(s+1)(s+2)+mρ2(s+2))]12+[A(ρ2,3γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]1p[(mρ2(s+1)(s+2)+γ2(s+2))]12).

    Proposition 2.15. Let ρ,γ(0,), ρ<γ, q>1, i(,0][1,){2q,q}

    then

    Liq+1iq+1(ρ,γ)(γρ)1q1([γLpp(ρ,γ)Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)]1p[(γi(s+1)(s+2)+mρi(s+2))]1q+[Lp+1p+1(ρ,γ)ρLpp(ρ,γ)]1p[(mρi(s+1)(s+2)+γi(s+2))]1q). (2.18)

    Proof.

    χ(t)=qi+qωiq+1,|χ(ω)|q=ωi

    Let

    g(ς)=|(ςρ+m(1ς)γ|i|ςsρ|i|m(1ς)sγ|i,
    g(ς)=(i)(i1)(ςρ+m(1ς)γ)i2(ρmγ)2s(s1)ςs2ρims(s1)(1ς)s2γi,

    g(ς)0 and g(1)=g(0) so g0 and |χ(ω)|q is (s,m)-convex, by using inequality (2.3) we have (2.18).

    Remark 2.16. For s,m=1 inequality (2.18) becomes (5) of [5].

    Example 2.17. For i=2 and p=q=2 Proposition 2.15 reduced to

    2A(ρ2,γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)(36)([A(3ρ2,γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]12[(γ2(s+1)(s+2)+mρ2(s+2))]12+[A(ρ2,3γ2)+G2(ρ,γ)]12[(mρ2(s+1)(s+2)+γ2(s+2))]12). (2.19)

    Proposition 2.18. Let ρ,γ(0,) with ρ<γ, q>1 and nN then we have

    ×|Lii(ρ,γ)[n1ν=0(1)νP(i,ν)(ν+1)!1]|P(i,n)s1qn!(12)1p(γρ)2p1(γ(in)q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)]+mρ(in)q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2γLnq+1nq+1(κ,μ)+μ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q+P(i,n)s1qn!(12)1p(γρ)2p1(γ(in)q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)2ρLnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lnqnq(ρ,γ)]+mρ(in)q(γρ)s1[Lnq+2nq+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lnq+1nq+1(ρ,γ)ργLnqnq(ρ,γ)])1q. (2.20)

    Proof. Let,

    χ(ω)=ωi,|χ(n)(ω)|q=[P(i,n)ωin]q

    As |χn(ω)|q is (s,m)-convex on (0,), therefore by using Theorem 2.3 required inequality (2.20) is obtained.

    Remark 2.19. For s,m=1 inequality (2.20) becomes inequality obtained in Proposition 4 of [5].

    Proposition 2.20. Let ρ,γ(0,) with ρ<γ q>1 and nN then we have,

    1(γρ)2p2s1q.21p((γq(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)]+mρq(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2γLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lqq(ρ,γ)])1q+(γq(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2ρLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lqq(ρ,γ)]+mρq(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)])1q), (2.21)

    Proof.

    χ(ω)=lnω,|χ(1)(ω)|q=[ω1]q

    As |χ(1)(ω)|q is (s,m)–convex, therefore by using inequality (2.6) required (2.21) obtained.

    Remark 2.21. For s,m=1 inequality (2.21) becomes inequality obtained in Proposition 5 of [5].

    Proposition 2.22. Let ρ,γ(0,) with ρ<γ q>1 and i(,0]{2q,q}, then

    Liq+1iq+1(ρ,γ)(γρ)2p2s1q.21p((γi(γρ)s1[Lnq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)]+mρi(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2γLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lqq(ρ,γ)])1q+(γi(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2ρLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lqq(ρ,γ)]+mρm(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)])1q). (2.22)

    Proof.

    χ(ω)=qi+qωiq+1|χ(ω)|q=ωi

    |χ(w)|q is (s,m)-convex by using inequality (2.6) required (2.22) obtained.

    For i=1 inequality (2.22) becomes,

    L1q+11q+1(ρ,γ)(γρ)2p2s1q.21p((γ1(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)]+mρ1(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2γLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+γ2Lqq(ρ,γ)])1q+(γ1(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)2ρLq+1q+1(ρ,γ)+ρ2Lqq(ρ,γ)]+mρ1(γρ)s1[Lq+2q+2(ρ,γ)+(ρ+γ)Lq+1q+1(ρ,γ)ργLqq(ρ,γ)])1q). (2.23)

    Remark 2.23. For s,m=1 inequality (2.22) becomes inequality obtained in Proposition 6 of [5].

    Proposition 2.24. Let ρ,γ(0,) with ρ<γ, q>1 and i[0,1] we have,

    Liq+1iq+1(ρ,γ)2sq(mγρ)1q1!Aiq(ρ,γ)((γLpp(ρ,mγ)Lp+1p+1(ρ,mγ))1p+(Lp+1p+1(ρ,mγ)ρLpp(ρ,mγ))1p). (2.24)

    Proof.

    χ(ω)=qi+qωiq+1,|χ(ω)|q=ωi.

    As |χ(ω)|q is (s,m)-concave by using inequality (2.15) we obtain required inequality (2.24).

    Remark 2.25. For s,m=1 inequality (2.24) becomes the inequality obtained in Proposition 9 of [5].

    In this paper, Hölder-Isçan inequality is utilized to prove Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-times differentiable (s,m)-convex functions. The method is adequate and provide many generalizations of existing results as shown in remarks. Moreover, many other inequalities can be generalized for other types of convex functions.

    This research received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation, (grant number B05F650018)

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] S. Banach, Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux quations intgrales, Fund. Math., 3 (1922), 133–183. doi: 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181
    [2] S. Sessa, On a weak commutativity condition of mappings in fixed point considerations, Publ. Inst. Math., 32 (1982), 149–153.
    [3] G. Jungck, Compatible mappings and common fixed points, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 9 (1986), 771–779. doi: 10.1155/S0161171286000935
    [4] G. Jungck, Common fixed points for non-continuous non-self maps on non-metric spaces, Far East J. Math. Sci., 4 (1996), 199–215.
    [5] M. Abbas, D. Gopal, S. Radenović, A note on recent introduced commutative conditions, Indian J. Math., 55 (2012), 195–202.
    [6] G. Jungck, P. P. Murthy, Y. J. Cho, Compatible mappings of type (A) and common fixed points, Math. Japonica, 36 (1993), 381–390.
    [7] H. K. Pathak, M. S. Khan, Compatible mappings of type (B) and common fixed point theorems of Greguš type, Czechoslovak Math. J., 45 (1995), 685–698. doi: 10.21136/CMJ.1995.128555
    [8] H. K. Pathak, Y. J. Cho, S. M. Kang, B. Madharia, Compatible mappings of type (C) and common fixed point theorem of Greguš type, Demonstr. Math., 31 (1998), 499–517.
    [9] H. K. Pathak, S. S. Chang, Y. J. Cho, Fixed point theorems for compatible mappings of type (P), Indian J. Math., 36 (1994), 151–166.
    [10] B. Singh, S. Jain, Semi-compatibility, compatibility and fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces, J. Chungcheong Math. Soc., 18 (2005), 1–22.
    [11] A. S. Saluja, M. K. Jain, P. K. Jhade, Weak semi-compatibility and fixed point theorems, Bull. Int. Math. Virt. Inst., 2 (2012), 205–217.
    [12] A. S. Saluja, M. K. Jain, Fixed point theorems under conditional semicompatibility with control function, Adv. Fixed Point Theory, 3 (2013), 648–666.
    [13] R. K. Bisht, N. Shahzad, Faintly compatibel mappings and common fixed points, Fixed Point Theory Appl., (2013), Article ID: 156.
    [14] M. A. Al-Thagafi, N. Shahzad, Generalized I-nonexpansive self maps and invariant proximations, Acta Math. Sinica, 24 (2008), 867–876. doi: 10.1007/s10114-007-5598-x
    [15] D. Dorić, Z. Kadelburg, S. Radenović, A note on occasionally weakly compatible mappings and common fixed points, Fixed Point Theory, 13 (2012), 475–480.
    [16] N. Hussain, S. M. Hussain, S. Radenović, Fixed points of weakly contractions through occasionally weak compatibility, J. Comput. Anal. Appl., 13 (2011), 532–543.
    [17] S. Ivković, On Various Generalizations of Semi- A-Fredholm Operators, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 14 (2020), Article No. 41.
    [18] M. A. Alghamdi, S. Radenović, N. Shahzad, On Some Generalizations of Commuting Mappings, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), Article ID: 952052.
    [19] M. R. Singh, Y. M. Singh, On various type of compatible mappings and common fixed point theorems for non-continuous mappings, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 40 (2011), 503–513.
    [20] R. P. Pant, A common fixed point theorem under a new condition, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 30 (1999), 147–152.
    [21] A. H. Ansari, V. Popa, Y. M. Singh, M. S. Khan, Fixed point theorems of an implicit relation via Cclass function in metric spaces, J. Adv. Math. Stud., 13 (2020), 1–10.
    [22] A. Djoudi, A unique common fixed point for compatible mappings of type (B) satisfying an implicit relation, Demonstratio Math., 36 (2003), 763–770.
    [23] A. Djoudi, General fixed point theorems for weakly compatible maps, Demonstratio Math., 38 (2005), 197–206.
    [24] M. R. Singh, Y. M. Singh, Compatible mappings of type (E) and common fixed point theorems of Meir-Keeler type, Int. J. Math. Sci. Eng. Appl., 1 (2007), 299–315.
    [25] R. P. Pant, R. K. Bisht, D. Arora, Weak reciprocal continuity and fixed point theorems, Ann. Univ. Ferrara, 57 (2011), 181–190. doi: 10.1007/s11565-011-0119-3
    [26] N. Saleem, A. H. Ansari, M. K. Jain, Some fixed point theorems of inverse Cclass function under weak semi-compatibility, J. Fixed Point Theory, 2018 (2018), 9. doi: 10.1186/s13663-018-0634-3
    [27] A. H. Ansari, Note on "φψ contractive type mappings and related fixed point", The 2nd regional conference on Mathematics and Applications, Payame Noor University, 2014,377–380.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ammara Nosheen, Maria Tariq, Khuram Ali Khan, Nehad Ali Shah, Jae Dong Chung, On Caputo Fractional Derivatives and Caputo–Fabrizio Integral Operators via (s, m)-Convex Functions, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 187, 10.3390/fractalfract7020187
    2. Jie Li, Yong Lin, Serap Özcan, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Ahsan Fareed Shah, A study of Hermite-Hadamard inequalities via Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operators using strongly (s,m)-convex functions in the second sense, 2025, 2025, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-025-03266-x
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1890) PDF downloads(47) Cited by(0)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog