There is a global consensus among scientists that human-caused climate change is threatening the environment and communities worldwide and that major changes must be implemented to reduce the increasing rate of CO2 emissions. Moreover, environmentally unsustainable practices are both endangering and degrading the quality of life on Earth. One major and often underestimated aspect of this problem is the difference in individual environmental risk perception and evaluation. It is evident that the responsibility for Earth's future lies in the hands of young generations and raising their awareness of environmental issues is a substantial challenge for education institutions. Students need to develop new values, skills and behaviors to foster sustainable development. As institutions of higher education, universities have a major impact on society and play a key role in the development of environmental awareness in young people. The paper describes the results of a survey administered to students in the Cultural Geography B course at the University of Torino. The purpose of the analysis was to determine if there is a relationship between environmental perception, attitude and behavior. The results showed that the students had a good knowledge of and positive attitude to the environment. However, as past studies have already revealed, there is a gap between their awareness and proactive environmental behaviors. Knowledge does not appear to be the only variable needed and other hypotheses should be explored to change the behavior of young generations. This study provides some insights for implementing integrated sustainability processes and engaging students. Moreover, the results will support the structuring of a future Geography course that focuses on sustainable development and environmental risk.
Citation: Elisabetta Genovese. University student perception of sustainability and environmental issues[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(4): 645-657. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022035
[1] | Hari M. Srivastava, Artion Kashuri, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Abdullah M. Alsharif, Juan L. G. Guirao . New Chebyshev type inequalities via a general family of fractional integral operators with a modified Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11167-11186. doi: 10.3934/math.2021648 |
[2] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Pshtiwan O. Mohammed, Y. S. Hamed, Artion Kashuri, Jorge E. Hernández, Jorge E. Macías-Díaz . On some generalized Raina-type fractional-order integral operators and related Chebyshev inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10256-10275. doi: 10.3934/math.2022571 |
[3] | Erhan Deniz, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Ebru Yüksel . New extensions of Chebyshev-Pólya-Szegö type inequalities via conformable integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 956-965. doi: 10.3934/math.2020066 |
[4] | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dumitru Baleanu . Some generalized fractional integral inequalities with nonsingular function as a kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3352-3377. doi: 10.3934/math.2021201 |
[5] | Erhan Set, M. Emin Özdemir, Sevdenur Demirbaş . Chebyshev type inequalities involving extended generalized fractional integral operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3573-3583. doi: 10.3934/math.2020232 |
[6] | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Erhan Set, Abdulaziz Garba Ahmad, Y. S. Hamed . On more general inequalities for weighted generalized proportional Hadamard fractional integral operator with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9154-9176. doi: 10.3934/math.2021532 |
[7] | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Asia Rauf, Fahd Jarad, Y. S. Hamed, Khadijah M. Abualnaja . Efficient computations for weighted generalized proportional fractional operators with respect to a monotone function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8001-8029. doi: 10.3934/math.2021465 |
[8] | Mustafa Gürbüz, Yakup Taşdan, Erhan Set . Ostrowski type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 42-53. doi: 10.3934/math.2020004 |
[9] | Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Gauhar Rahman, Aftab Khan, Asifa Tassaddiq, Moheb Saad Abouzaid . Certain generalized fractional integral inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1588-1602. doi: 10.3934/math.2020108 |
[10] | Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Fahd Jarad, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Artion Kashuri . Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions via generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional operator with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12303-12321. doi: 10.3934/math.2022683 |
There is a global consensus among scientists that human-caused climate change is threatening the environment and communities worldwide and that major changes must be implemented to reduce the increasing rate of CO2 emissions. Moreover, environmentally unsustainable practices are both endangering and degrading the quality of life on Earth. One major and often underestimated aspect of this problem is the difference in individual environmental risk perception and evaluation. It is evident that the responsibility for Earth's future lies in the hands of young generations and raising their awareness of environmental issues is a substantial challenge for education institutions. Students need to develop new values, skills and behaviors to foster sustainable development. As institutions of higher education, universities have a major impact on society and play a key role in the development of environmental awareness in young people. The paper describes the results of a survey administered to students in the Cultural Geography B course at the University of Torino. The purpose of the analysis was to determine if there is a relationship between environmental perception, attitude and behavior. The results showed that the students had a good knowledge of and positive attitude to the environment. However, as past studies have already revealed, there is a gap between their awareness and proactive environmental behaviors. Knowledge does not appear to be the only variable needed and other hypotheses should be explored to change the behavior of young generations. This study provides some insights for implementing integrated sustainability processes and engaging students. Moreover, the results will support the structuring of a future Geography course that focuses on sustainable development and environmental risk.
Anaphylaxis is a severe and generalized form of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction, most commonly caused by an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction after allergen exposure. In this mechanism the allergen-specific IgE/high-affinity receptor (FcϵRI) on effector cells (mast and basophils) interacts with an allergen and leads to increased mediator synthesis, responsible for the symptoms [1],[2]. Other mechanisms may also lead to anaphylactic reactions. These involve non-IgE-mediated pathways resulting in activation ofthe complement system (anaphylatoxins, C3a, and C5a), contact and coagulation system activation, or immunoglobulin G (IgG)-mediated anaphylaxis [2]. Rarely, a reaction may occur with no known triggers and those cases will be classified as idiopathic [2].
The definition of what constitutes anaphylaxis slightly varies amongst different sources. According to most recent guidelines, published in World Allergy Organizational Journal, the clinical diagnosis is highly likely when either of the following clinical criteria are met:
It is worth noting that disorders such as acute asthma, acute generalized urticaria, aspiration of a foreign body such as a peanut, vasovagal episode, and anxiety or panic attacks can present similar symptoms [1],[2]. Furthermore, it has been noted that there are age-related differences in the clinical presentation of anaphylaxis [3].
There are many known causes of anaphylaxis. The most common triggers include food, drugs and insect venom [1],[2]. In the pediatric population, food is the most frequent cause [4]. These act as allergens and exposure may result in pathways leading to the clinical features of anaphylaxis. Additionally, certain age-related co-factors and individual comorbidities may increase the severity of reaction [4],[5].
Many studies have observed that cases of anaphylaxis have been increasing in the past years. Some studies also noted an increase in cases of anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization due to symptom severity [6],[7]. Because of the unstable nature of this disease, all patients with anaphylaxis, or symptoms which are likely to progress to anaphylaxis, require immediate examination and treatment [1],[2],[8].
The first line treatment in anaphylaxis is epinephrine [8]. This is a drug with vasoconstrictor effects, which help prevent upper airway mucosal edema, hypotension, and shock [9]. It also has important bronchodilator effects, cardiac inotropic and chronotropic effects [9]. By these actions it helps prevent progression of life-threatening anaphylaxis [2],[9]. Studies show that early administration of epinephrine is associated with better outcomes: less intensive care unit and in-hospital admissions [10]. The method of choice is injection of intramuscular (IM) epinephrine into the antero-lateral thigh (vastus lateralis). There are no absolute contraindications preventing the use of this drug in the setting of anaphylaxis [1],[2],[8]. This method has a relatively safe profile in the pediatric population with low rates of serious adverse effects [11].
Some transient pharmacologic effects such as pallor, tremor, anxiety, palpitations, headache, and dizziness occur within minutes after epinephrine injection [9]. Rarely, serious adverse effects such as pulmonary edema or hypertension may occur, usually this is due to overdose [9],[11].
The article will address the role of epinephrine at all stages of pediatric anaphylaxis management: pre-hospital, hospital, and post-hospital. We will mention a brief outline of gaps in the usage of the drug in clinical practice will be mentioned as well as suggestions on how to improve them.
Anaphylaxis most often occurs in non-healthcare settings, with bystanders frequently becoming the first responders. Epinephrine should be provided early on; delayed administration has been associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and severity of complications [1],[12],[13]. The initial treatment of anaphylaxis should consist of prompt injection of IM epinephrine in the mid-outer thigh (vastus lateralis muscle) in appropriately selected pre-set doses [1],[2],[8]. Commercially, epinephrine used in the pediatric population is often available in the form of prescription autoinjectors (EA) in the forms of 0.15 mg (recommended for those weighing 15–30 kg), 0.30 mg (for those weighing over 30 kg) or 0.5 mg (for adults and adolescents weighing over 60 kg) [1],[2],[14]. There may be some variation in the cut-off of these values in different areas, therefore it is worth consulting local guidelines. The 0.5 mg dose is available in Europe, although some devices recalled from the market, and since recently, Canada. Patients should be monitored, and doses should be repeated every 5–15 minutes if symptoms do not improve [1],[2],[8].
The pre-set dosages present with some of their own issues, as they are not appropriate for infants or children weighing between 7.5 kg to 15 kg. In the past, such cases were recommended to be treated with the smaller dosage of 0.15 mg [1],[2],[8]. Recently, in the United States, an EA with doses of 0.1 mg has been approved [15]. Thus, it is recommended to use it in appropriate cases when available. However, it is important to remember that in cases of anaphylaxis the use of epinephrine is always recommended regardless of age and weight as the life saving potential outweighs any side effects.
After an episode of anaphylaxis, the patient should receive a prescription for EA, when appropriate, along with instructions on how and when to use the medication [1],[8]. Since many cases of anaphylaxis are subsequent events after trigger re-exposure, patients will often be carrying a prescribed epinephrine autoinjector already. In such cases, bystanders should inject the medication as soon as possible. A good practice is to carry an anaphylaxis action plan, with clear steps explaining how to proceed that can easily be understood by individuals who do not have much exposure with such situations [1],[8].
However, in many cases, the emergency medical services will act as the first responders. In the pre-hospital setting, the first line management remains the same, as outlined above. This method of treatment is recommended for all ages. When presented in this form, it can be life saving and well tolerated.
Anaphylaxis may also occur in the healthcare setting where the management slightly changes. According to guidelines, the first line treatment in the emergency department remains IM epinephrine [1],[8]. However, the method of epinephrine dosing changes. If the patient is managed in this setting, the dosage of the drug should be calculated individually per weight. The dose recommended for use by healthcare professionals is 0.01 mg/kg of body weight, to a maximum total dose of 0.5 mg in children over 12 years old [1],[8]. In children younger than that age, the dose should be calculated based on patient age, according to the following [1]:
Dosing should be repeated every 5–15 minutes [1], if symptoms stay refractory to treatment. There is also an option of providing epinephrine by the intravenous route. However, this increases the risk of adverse effects such as fatal arrythmias [1],[2]. If such treatment is required, it is to be provided only by experienced personnel with careful monitoring [8]. The indications for the IV route are anaphylaxis refractory to IM epinephrine, shock or respiratory failure [1]. The dose and rate of infusion should be adjusted for severity of symptoms.
Anaphylaxis may also occur in an in-hospital ward setting when a consultation from an experienced specialist may not be immediately available. Examples of these situations may occur in rural centers or small non-emergency facilities. Studies show that despite guidelines, epinephrine use remains suboptimal [1],[16],[17]. Our recommendation for wards that manage anaphylaxis cases often, is to dose epinephrine based on patient weight. The wards who do not have as much experience in these cases may choose to use the approximated doses of 0.15 mg, 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg as appropriate by weight and age. Both these methods are correct according to guidelines and may allow to lower rates of personnel apprehension and hesitancy regarding using epinephrine.
Epinephrine also has roles in the out-patient management and follow-up of anaphylaxis. This includes patient education on how to minimize and manage further reactions; they must be educated on proper EA usage before leaving the hospital. Patients should receive training on trigger avoidance, specialist (allergist) referrals and EA prescriptions and training [1],[8]. The provided prescription should include more than one EA, and patients should be recommended to have at least two EA's available [1],[8]. This should be emphasized to all patients, as studies show that when responding to anaphylaxis, using a second dose of epinephrine will be required in 16–32% of cases [2]. Patient education is crucial, as many of these reactions will occur outside of the hospital. In the pediatrics population it is important to include guardians in the planning as they will be the ones responding frequently. Additionally, they should be advised to discuss the child's condition and its required management with teachers or any other adult who spends a substantial amount of time with them. All healthcare professionals should familiarize themselves with guidelines, as they should also feel comfortable when explaining this topic and with using epinephrine when responding to anaphylaxis.
Epinephrine is underused when treating anaphylaxis [18],[19]. In a North Carolina based study, Cristiano et al., observed that epinephrine is frequently underused by emergency medical services in the pre-hospital management of pediatric anaphylaxis. They observed that those under the age of ten are especially susceptible [20]. Carrillo et al., determined that epinephrine was provided by California based emergency medical services to only half of the anaphylaxis cases in which a clinical diagnosis of the disease was made [21]. Many also noted underusing of epinephrine in the hospital setting. Such were Dubus et al., who noted that physicians practicing in France decided to use the drug only in most severe pediatric anaphylaxis cases [22]. As mentioned, all patients who have presented an anaphylactic event should receive EA prescriptions, wherever these are available, or appropriate alternative adrenaline (prefilled syringe or vial plus intramuscular needle) if EA are not available [1],[2]. However, there is a tendency for physicians to under-prescribe epinephrine to patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis in the ED [2]. Another issue is patients not carrying the proper number of EA as recommended. In a study examining the availability of a second dose of epinephrine (in anaphylaxis) if needed, Song et al., stated that half of the studied population required further emergency response due to inability to access a second dose of epinephrine [23].
As mentioned earlier, delayed administration of epinephrine is associated with increased hospital admissions and complications [1],[14]. This emphasizes the gap that needs to be addressed to avoid missed opportunities when life-saving epinephrine should be administered at all levels. There is a need for prompt patient education on symptoms and usage of EA. They also need to be educated on the importance of proper management adherence. We also suggest that healthcare professionals working in environments which are likely to be required to manage anaphylaxis also receive clear training on epinephrine use and dosages to lessen the hesitancy when providing the treatment. Clear indications on which dosages to use in which wards may help with this.
Epinephrine plays a crucial role in the management of anaphylaxis at all stages of care. It is the first line treatment in both the non-healthcare and in-hospital treatment. Data on suboptimal use of the drug in emergency cases shows that steps should be taken to ensure that it is applied in all necessary situations. In this article, we outlined the most crucial, not to be omitted aspects of managing pediatric anaphylaxis using epinephrine.
[1] |
Genovese E, Thaler T (2020) The benefits of flood mitigation strategies: effectiveness of integrated protection measures. AIMS Geosci 6: 459-472. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020025 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020025
![]() |
[2] | Moswete NN, Manwa H, Purkitt H (2017) Perceptions of College Students Towards Climate Change, Environmental, and Tourism Issues: A Comparative Study in Botswana and the US. Int J Environ Sci Educ 12: 1175-1193. |
[3] | Genovese E, Thaler T (2021) Le Soluzioni Basate sulla Natura nelle aree urbane come incentivo ai processi di gentrification, Città (in)vivibili, Nuova Trauben Ed., Torino. |
[4] | IPCC, Climate Change 2014. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group Ⅱ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/. |
[5] | IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf. |
[6] |
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J, et al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347: 736-747. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
![]() |
[7] | World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, London, 1987. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf. |
[8] | United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, Record of the general conference. Paris, 1997. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114588. |
[9] | Franz G (2022) L'umanità a un bivio - Il dilemma della sostenibilità a trent'anni da Rio de Janeiro, Edizioni Mimesis. |
[10] |
Aleixo AM, Leal S, Azeiteiro UM (2021) Higher education students' perceptions of sustainable development in Portugal. J Cleaner Prod 327: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429
![]() |
[11] |
Lozano R, Lukman R, Lozano FJ, et al. (2013) Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J Cleaner Prod 48: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
![]() |
[12] |
Perez-Foguet A, Lazzarini B, Gine R, et al. (2018) Promoting sustainable human development in engineering: assessment of online courses within continuing professional development strategies. J Cleaner Prod 172: 4286-4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.244 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.244
![]() |
[13] | UNESCO, Belgrade Charter on Environmental Education. Paris: UNESCO, 1975. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000153491. |
[14] |
Yarime M, Tanaka Y (2012) The Issues and Methodologies in Sustainability Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions-A Review of Recent Trends and Future Challenges. J Sustain Dev Educ 6: 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340821100600113 doi: 10.1177/097340821100600113
![]() |
[15] | UNESCO, Framework for the implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) beyond 2019. General Conference, 40th Session, Paris, 2019. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370215. |
[16] | UNESCO, The concept of sustainability and its contribution towards quality transformative education: thematic paper, Paris, 2022. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381528. |
[17] |
de Sousa Carvalho A, Sevilla-Pavón A, Seiz-Ortiz R (2012) Autonomy and ICT in environmental education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 46:1343-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.299 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.299
![]() |
[18] | Carvalho ICM (2004) Educação ambiental: a formação do sujeito ecológico, Cortez Ed., São Paulo. |
[19] |
Hamid S, Ijab MT, Sulaiman H, et al. (2017) Social media for environmental sustainability awareness in higher education. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 18: 474-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2015-0010 doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2015-0010
![]() |
[20] |
Keinonen T, Palmberg I, Kukkonen J, et al. (2016) Higher Education Students' Perceptions of Environmental Issues and Media Coverage. Discourse Commun Sustainable Educ 7: 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0001 doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0001
![]() |
[21] |
Rieckmann M (2012) Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures 44: 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005
![]() |
[22] |
Wright TSA (2002) Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. High Educ Policy 15: 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(02)00002-8 doi: 10.1016/S0952-8733(02)00002-8
![]() |
[23] |
Sanchez-Carracedo F, Ruiz-Morales J, Valderrama-Hernadez R, et al. (2021) Analysis of the presence of sustainability in Higher Education of the Spanish university system. Stud Higher Educ 46: 300-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630811 doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1630811
![]() |
[24] |
Major L, Namestovski Z, Horak R, et al. (2017) Teach it to sustain it! Environmental attitudes of Hungarian teacher training students in Serbia. J Cleaner Prod 154: 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.163 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.163
![]() |
[25] | La tutela dell'Ambiente entra in Costituzione, 2022. Available from: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/la-tutela-dell-ambiente-entra-costituzione-AEHUOsCB. |
[26] | Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza, 2021. Available from: https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf. |
[27] | REACT-EU-Research contracts on innovation and green topics, 2021. Available from: http://www.ponricerca.gov.it/opportunita/react-eu-research-contracts-on-innovation-and-green-topics/. |
[28] |
Stephens JC, Hernandez ME, Roman M, et al (2008) Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 9: 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810885916 doi: 10.1108/14676370810885916
![]() |
[29] |
Velazquez L, Munguia N, Sanchez M (2005) Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 6: 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510623865 doi: 10.1108/14676370510623865
![]() |
[30] |
Sibbel A (2009) Pathways towards sustainability through higher education. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 10: 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910925262 doi: 10.1108/14676370910925262
![]() |
[31] |
Chan CKY, Fong ETY, Luk LYY, et al. (2017) A review of literature on challenges in the development and implementation of generic competencies in higher education curriculum. Int J Educ Dev 57: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.010
![]() |
[32] |
Karatzoglou B (2013) An in-depth literature review of the evolving roles and contributions of universities to Education for Sustainable Development. J Cleaner Prod 49: 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.043 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.043
![]() |
[33] |
Chaplin G, Wyton P (2014) Student engagement with sustainability: understanding the value-action gap. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 15: 404-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2012-0029 doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2012-0029
![]() |
[34] |
Boca GD, Saraçlı S (2019) Environmental Education and Student's Perception, for Sustainability. Sustainability 11: 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061553 doi: 10.3390/su11061553
![]() |
[35] |
Chuvieco E, Burgui M, Silva E, et al. (2018) Factors affecting environmental sustainability habits of university students: intercomparison analysis in three countries (Spain, Brazil and UAE). J Cleaner Prod 198: 1372-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.121 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.121
![]() |
[36] |
Dagiliūtė R, Liobikienė G, Minelgaitė A (2018) Sustainability at universities: students' perceptions from green and non-green universities. J Cleaner Prod 181: 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.213 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.213
![]() |
[37] |
Sonetti G, Sarrica M, Norton LS (2021) Conceptualization of sustainability among students, administrative and teaching staff of a university community: An exploratory study in Italy. J Cleaner Prod 316: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128292 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128292
![]() |
[38] |
D'Agostino L, Santus D (2022) Teaching geography and blended learning: interdisciplinary and new learning possibilities. AIMS Geosci 8: 266-276. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022016 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022016
![]() |
[39] |
Graziano T (2022) The insiders' gaze: fieldworks, social media and visual methodologies in urban tourism. AIMS Geosci 8: 366-384. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022021 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022021
![]() |
[40] |
Palmentieri S (2022) E-Learning in Geography: new perspectives in post-pandemic. AIMS Geosci 8: 52-67. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022004 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022004
![]() |
[41] |
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8: 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
![]() |
[42] |
Kagawa F (2007) Dissonance in students' perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 8: 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174 doi: 10.1108/14676370710817174
![]() |
[43] |
Cogut G, Webster NJ, Marans RW, et al. (2019) Links between sustainability-related awareness and behavior: the moderating role of engagement. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ 20: 1240-1257. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2018-0161 doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-09-2018-0161
![]() |
[44] |
Watson M K, Lozano R, Noyes C, et al. (2013) Assessing curricula contribution to sustainability more holistically: Experiences from the integration of curricula assessment and students' perceptions at the Georgia Institute of Technology. J Cleaner Prod 61: 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.010
![]() |
[45] |
Boni A, Lopez-Fogues A, Walker M (2016) Higher education and the post-2015 agenda: a contribution from the human development approach. J Global Ethics 12: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2016.1148757 doi: 10.1080/17449626.2016.1148757
![]() |
[46] |
Leal Filho W, Skanavis C, Kounani A, et al. (2019) The role of planning in implementing sustainable development in a higher education context. J Cleaner Prod 235: 678-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.322 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.322
![]() |
1. | Joanna Żyła, Mateusz Henryk Kopczyński, Tomasz Konieczny, Jan Stachurski, Identification of factors causing dyspnea among children reported to the Emergency Department, 2024, 11, 23917822, 178, 10.36740/EmeMS202403106 |