Risk narrations and perceptions in the COVID-19 time. A discourse analysis through the Italian press

Giulia de Spuches; Francesca Sabatini; Gabriella Palermo; Emanuela Caravello; Giulia de Spuches; Francesca Sabatini; Gabriella Palermo; Emanuela Caravello

doi:10.3934/geosci.2020028

AIMS Geosciences

2020, Volume 6, Issue 4: 504-514. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020028

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Risk narrations and perceptions in the COVID-19 time. A discourse analysis through the Italian press

Dipartimento Culture e Società, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy

Received: 23 October 2020 Accepted: 11 November 2020 Published: 25 November 2020

This paper explores how the risk related to the pandemic of COVID-19 was managed, narrated and perceived in Italy during the lockdown phase, from February until June 2020. To reach this aim, the study provides a discourse analysis of three main level: the official institutional discourses declaimed by the government and the health authority; the risk narration spread through the diaphragm of the Italian press, and specifically through two of the most-read newspapers in Italy (Repubblica and Corriere della Sera) and their related weeklies (Venerdì di Repubblica and Sette); finally, the diverse reactions and perceptions to the risk coming from the most affected and most vulnerable subjects, communities and territories. In order to record this narrative frame, our study started by looking for the more recurrent keywords through which the public discourse about COVID-19 emergency was spread in Italy. The examined words, together with a literary review about risk, disaster, and sustainability, give back, and allow to understand, the mirror of the risk management, perception, and narration in the pandemic society. According to the Foucaultos thought, a constant theoretical reference has been the power control exerted in the plague city. In this article we show in a nutshell some of the main elements emerged through this discourse analysis. Firstly, it comes to light how the world has been caught totally unprepared to manage collectively a pandemic of this magnitude. Secondly, two main emergency consequences emerged. Indeed, if on one hand the risk management created privileges and inequalities, on the other hand the risk perception led to communitieso practices of solidarity and resilience. Finally, our research demonstrates what is depicted in the reported literary review: disasters are unevenly and differential phenomena.
- COVID-19,
- discourse analysis,
- emergency,
- Italian press,
- policies,
- risk management
Citation: Giulia de Spuches, Francesca Sabatini, Gabriella Palermo, Emanuela Caravello. Risk narrations and perceptions in the COVID-19 time. A discourse analysis through the Italian press[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(4): 504-514. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020028

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper explores how the risk related to the pandemic of COVID-19 was managed, narrated and perceived in Italy during the lockdown phase, from February until June 2020. To reach this aim, the study provides a discourse analysis of three main level: the official institutional discourses declaimed by the government and the health authority; the risk narration spread through the diaphragm of the Italian press, and specifically through two of the most-read newspapers in Italy (Repubblica and Corriere della Sera) and their related weeklies (Venerdì di Repubblica and Sette); finally, the diverse reactions and perceptions to the risk coming from the most affected and most vulnerable subjects, communities and territories. In order to record this narrative frame, our study started by looking for the more recurrent keywords through which the public discourse about COVID-19 emergency was spread in Italy. The examined words, together with a literary review about risk, disaster, and sustainability, give back, and allow to understand, the mirror of the risk management, perception, and narration in the pandemic society. According to the Foucaultos thought, a constant theoretical reference has been the power control exerted in the plague city. In this article we show in a nutshell some of the main elements emerged through this discourse analysis. Firstly, it comes to light how the world has been caught totally unprepared to manage collectively a pandemic of this magnitude. Secondly, two main emergency consequences emerged. Indeed, if on one hand the risk management created privileges and inequalities, on the other hand the risk perception led to communitieso practices of solidarity and resilience. Finally, our research demonstrates what is depicted in the reported literary review: disasters are unevenly and differential phenomena.

References

[1]	Sherman WR (1998) Emerging Infectious Diseases Are a National Security Challenge to the United States. Available from: https://1997-2001.state.gov/policy_remarks/1998/980325_sherman_diseases.html.
[2]	O'Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B (1976) Taking the Naturalness Out of Natural Disasters. Nature 260: 566-567. doi: 10.1038/260566a0
[3]	Uitto JI, Shaw R (2017) Sustainable Development and Disaster Risk Reduction, Berlin: Springer.
[4]	Cattarinussi B, Pelanda C (1981) Disastro e azione umana. Introduzione allo studio multidisciplinare dei disastri, Milano: Franco Angeli.
[5]	Mela A, Mugnano S, Olori D (2017) Territori vulnerabili. Verso una nuova sociologia dei disastri italiana, Milano: Franco Angeli.
[6]	United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015) The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Available from: https: //www.unisdr.org/.
[7]	Giovagnoli M (2018) Piccolo dizionario sociale del terremoto, Ascoli Piceno: Cromo Edizioni.
[8]	Mela A (2017) La resilienza nell'ottica territorialista, In: Mela A, Mugnano S, Olori D, editors, Territori vulnerabili. Verso una nuova sociologia dei disastri italiana, Milano: Franco Angeli, 23-27.
[9]	Olori D (2015) Ricerca qualitativa, vulnerabilità e disastri. Note metodologiche. In: Saitta P, editors, Fukushima, Concordia e altre macerie. Vita quotidiana, resistenza e gestione del disastro, Firenze: Edit Press, 109-118.
[10]	Kapiriri L, Ross A (2020) The politics of disease epidemics: a comparative analysis of the SARS, zika, and Ebola outbreaks. Global Soc Welfare 7: 33-45. doi: 10.1007/s40609-018-0123-y
[11]	Blakely DEM (2001) Mass mediated disease: A case study analysis of news reporting and three influenza pandemics and public health policy. Lanham: Lexington Books.
[12]	Abeysinghe S, White K (2011) The avian influenza pandemic: Discourses of risk, contagion and preparation in Australia. Health Risk Soc 13: 311-326. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2011.575457
[13]	Khan AS (2016) The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind's Gravest Dangers. New York: PublicAffairs.
[14]	Government of Italy (2020) Coronavirus, le misure adottate dal Governo. Available from: http://www.governo.it/it/coronavirus-misure-del-governo.
[15]	World Health Organization (2020) Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public.
[16]	Foucault M (1975) Surveiller et punir, Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
[17]	Guerzoni M (2020) Interview to Conte. Available from: http://www.governo.it/it/articolo/intervista-al-corriere-della-sera/14189.
[18]	Galluzzo M (2020) Riapertura tra le tensioni. Corriere della Sera, May 6.
[19]	De Vito L, Dazzi Z (2020) Il Trivulzio. La Repubblica, Apr 18.
[20]	Aciman A (2020) La prossima generazione ricorderà come si dà un abbraccio? Sette, Mar 27.
[21]	Santelli F (2020) I tre mesi che sconvolsero il mondo. Venerdì di Repubblica, Mar 27.
[22]	Postiglione V (2020) I lavoratori invisibili che tengono vive le città. Corriere della Sera, Apr 7.
[23]	Battistini F (2020) Dal Venezuela al Cairo. Se i regimi sfruttano i divieti del virus. Corriere della Sera, Mar 13.
[24]	Maletti J (2020) Le campane di Bologna come ai tempi della peste. Venerdì di Repubblica, Apr 3.
[25]	Mauro E (2020) La pandemia aiuta gli autocrati. La Repubblica, Apr 26.
[26]	Mauro E (2020) L'abuso dell'emergenza. La Repubblica, Mar 31.
[27]	Querzè R (2020) Morandi più virus. E lo smartworking va. Sette, Feb 28.
[28]	Cella F (2020) Scuola, riunioni, feste, aperitivi. Siamo un paese in videoconferenza. Sette, Apr 24.
[29]	Mauro E (2020) 2 giugno, lo spazio repubblicano. La Repubblica, Jun 2.
[30]	Mauro E (2020) Il lavoro degli altri. La Repubblica, Mar 23.
[31]	Mauro E (2020) La grande tentazione. La Repubblica, Feb 26.
[32]	Ainis M (2020) Ma quanto è asociale questo Stato. Venerdì di Repubblica, Apr 3.
[33]	Deaglio E (2020) Chi si ricorderà dei morti di Modena. Venerdì di Repubblica, Mar 20.
[34]	Panebianco A (2020) I nemici inventati (e veri). Corriere della Sera, Apr 22.
[35]	Mauro E (2020) I clandestini del contagio. La Repubblica, Mar 12.
[36]	Giovannini E (2020) Mai come ora bisogna parlare di giustizia sociale. Corriere della Sera, Apr 17.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)