Processing math: 100%
Research article

The historical transition of return transmission, volatility spillovers, and dynamic conditional correlations: A fresh perspective and new evidence from the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets

  • Received: 22 February 2024 Revised: 05 June 2024 Accepted: 10 June 2024 Published: 19 June 2024
  • JEL Codes: G00, G10, G12, G15

  • This paper quantitatively investigated the historical transition of return transmission, volatility spillovers, and correlations between the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets. Applying a vector autoregressive (VAR)-dynamic conditional correlation (DCC)-multivariate exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (MEGARCH) model, we derived new evidence for four historical periods between 1984 and 2024. First, we found that the return transmission from the US to the other markets has historically become stronger, whereas recently, the return transmission from the UK to the US has disappeared. Second, we clarified that volatility spillovers from the US to the other markets have historically become stronger, whereas recently, volatility spillovers from the UK to the US have also disappeared. Third, our analyses of the historical constant correlations and DCCs revealed that stock market connectedness has gradually tightened between the US and Japan and between the UK and Japan, whereas recently, the connectedness between the US and UK has weakened. Fourth, our VAR-DCC analyses also revealed that volatility spillovers between the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets have been asymmetric. Fifth, we further showed that the skew-t errors incorporated into our VAR-DCC model are effective in estimating the dynamic stock return linkages between the US, the UK, and Japan. Finally, based on our findings, we derived many significant and beneficial interpretations and implications for historically and deeply considering return transmission, volatility spillovers, and DCCs between international stock markets.

    Citation: Chikashi Tsuji. The historical transition of return transmission, volatility spillovers, and dynamic conditional correlations: A fresh perspective and new evidence from the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2024, 8(2): 410-436. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2024016

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jiankang Wang, Zhefeng Xu, Minmin Jia . Distribution of values of Hardy sums over Chebyshev polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3788-3797. doi: 10.3934/math.2024186
    [2] Zhenjiang Pan, Zhengang Wu . The inverses of tails of the generalized Riemann zeta function within the range of integers. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28558-28568. doi: 10.3934/math.20231461
    [3] Taekyun Kim, Dae San Kim, Dmitry V. Dolgy, Jongkyum Kwon . Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of two different types. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12528-12542. doi: 10.3934/math.2021722
    [4] Utkal Keshari Dutta, Prasanta Kumar Ray . On the finite reciprocal sums of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(6): 1569-1581. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.6.1569
    [5] S. Akansha, Aditya Subramaniam . Exploring Chebyshev polynomial approximations: Error estimates for functions of bounded variation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8688-8706. doi: 10.3934/math.2025398
    [6] Jin Li . Barycentric rational collocation method for semi-infinite domain problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8756-8771. doi: 10.3934/math.2023439
    [7] Muhammad Uzair Awan, Nousheen Akhtar, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Yu-Ming Chu . 2D approximately reciprocal ρ-convex functions and associated integral inequalities. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4662-4680. doi: 10.3934/math.2020299
    [8] Tingting Du, Zhengang Wu . Some identities involving the bi-periodic Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5838-5846. doi: 10.3934/math.2023294
    [9] Xiao Jiang, Shaofang Hong . On the denseness of certain reciprocal power sums. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 412-419. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.412
    [10] Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Omar Mazen Alqubori, Ahmed Gamal Atta . A collocation procedure for the numerical treatment of FitzHugh–Nagumo equation using a kind of Chebyshev polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1201-1223. doi: 10.3934/math.2025057
  • This paper quantitatively investigated the historical transition of return transmission, volatility spillovers, and correlations between the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets. Applying a vector autoregressive (VAR)-dynamic conditional correlation (DCC)-multivariate exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (MEGARCH) model, we derived new evidence for four historical periods between 1984 and 2024. First, we found that the return transmission from the US to the other markets has historically become stronger, whereas recently, the return transmission from the UK to the US has disappeared. Second, we clarified that volatility spillovers from the US to the other markets have historically become stronger, whereas recently, volatility spillovers from the UK to the US have also disappeared. Third, our analyses of the historical constant correlations and DCCs revealed that stock market connectedness has gradually tightened between the US and Japan and between the UK and Japan, whereas recently, the connectedness between the US and UK has weakened. Fourth, our VAR-DCC analyses also revealed that volatility spillovers between the US, UK, and Japanese stock markets have been asymmetric. Fifth, we further showed that the skew-t errors incorporated into our VAR-DCC model are effective in estimating the dynamic stock return linkages between the US, the UK, and Japan. Finally, based on our findings, we derived many significant and beneficial interpretations and implications for historically and deeply considering return transmission, volatility spillovers, and DCCs between international stock markets.



    The properties of orthogonal polynomials and recursive sequences are popular in number theory. They are important in theoretical research and application. The famous Chebyshev polynomials and Fibonacci polynomials are widely used in the field of function, approximation theory and difference equation. They also promote the development of both the branch of mathematics such as cryptography, combinatorics and application of discipline such as intelligent sensing, satellite positioning. Furthermore, they are close to the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Therefore, a large number of scholars have investigated them and get many properties and identities.

    In the aspect of sums of reciprocals, Millin [1] originally studied the infinite sums of reciprocal Fibonacci series where the subscript is 2n. Based on the initial achievement, Good [2] further studied this issue and proved

    n=01F2n=752.

    Afterwards, Ohtsuka and Nakamura [3] deduced the infinite sum of reciprocal Fibonacci series

    (k=n1Fk)1={FnFn1,if n is even and n2 ,FnFn11,if n is odd and n1;

    and the infinite sum of reciprocal square Fibonacci series

    (k=n1F2k)1={FnFn11,if n is even and n2 ,FnFn1,if n is odd and n1;

    Similar properties were investigated in several different ways, see reference [4,5]. Falcón and Plaza [6,7,8] used Fibonacci polynomials to study Fibonacci numbers and get a lot of identities. For example,

    n1k=1Fk(x)Fnk(x)=(n1)xFn(x)+2nFn1(x)x2+4,
    nk=1Fk(x)=Fn+1(x)+Fn(x)1x

    where n and k are positive integers. This fact allows them to invest some integer sequences in a new and direct way. With these fundamental achievements, Wu and Zhang[9] proceeded generation and deduced the the infinite sum of reciprocal Fibonacci polynomials

    (k=n1Fk(x))1={Fn(x)Fn1(x),if n is even and n2 ,Fn(x)Fn1(x)1,if n is odd and n1;

    and the the infinite sum of reciprocal square Fibonacci polynomials

    (k=n1F2k(x))1={xFn(x)Fn1(x)1,if n is even and n2 ,xFn(x)Fn1(x),if n is odd and n1;

    where x is any positive integer. besides, Panda et al.[10] did some research about bounds for reciprocal sums in terms of balancing and Lucas-balancing sequences. Also, Dutta and Ray[11] found some identities about finite reciprocal sums of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials.

    As we know, the first and the second kind of Chebyshev polynomials are usually defined as follows: Tn+2(x)=2xTn+1(x)Tn(x), n0, with the initial values T0(x)=1, T1(x)=x; Un+2(x)=2xUn+1(x)Un(x), n0, with the initial values U0(x)=1, U1(x)=2x; Then from the second-order linear recurrence sequences we have

    Tn(x)=12[(x+x21)n+(xx21)n],Un(x)=12x21[(x+x21)n+1(xx21)n+1].

    Based on these sequences, many scholars used these polynomials to study the Fibonacci sequences and the Lucas sequences and have investigated them and got many properties of Fn and Ln. For example, Zhang[12] used the Chebyshev polynomials and has obtain the general formulas involving Fn and Ln

    a1+a2++ak+1=nFm(a1+1)Fm(a2+1)Fm(ak+1+1)=(i)mnFk+1m2kk!U(k)n+k(imLm2).
    a1+a2++ak+1=n+k+1Lm(a1+1)Lm(a2+1)Lm(ak+1+1)
    =(i)m(n+k+1)2k!k+1h=0(im+2Lm2)h(k+1)!h!(k+1h)!U(k)n+2k+1h(imLm2),

    where k, m are any positive integers, a1, a2, ak+1 are nonnegative integers and i is the square root of 1. Wu and Yang[13] also studied Chebyshev polynomials and got a lot of properties. Besides, Dilcher and Stolarsky[14] established several related results involving resultants and discriminants about Chebyshev polynomials. Furthermore, bounds about the discriminant of the Chebyshev polynomials were given by Filipovski[15].

    A variety of sums about Chebyshev polynomials are hot issues in the number theory all the time. For example, Cesarano [16] gained several conclusions about the generating function of Chebyshev polynomials

    n=0ξnTn+l(x)=(1ξx)Tl(x)ξ(1x2)Ul112ξx+ξ2

    and the identical equation

    n=0ξnUn1+l(x)=ξTl(x)(1ξx)Ul112ξx+ξ2

    In this, ξ is a real number and 1<ξ<1. Furthermore, Knopfmacher et al.[17] did some research and got the result as follows:

    1Um(x)=1m+1mj=1(1)j+1sin2θjxcosθj

    and the identical equation

    1+Um1(x)Um(x)=1m+1mj=1[1+(1)j+1]sin2θjxcosθj,

    where θj=jπm+1, m is a positive integer.

    In this paper, we combine Ohtsuka and Falcón's ideas. Then we consider the subseries of infinite sums derived from the reciprocals of the Chebyshev polynomials and prove the following:

    Theorem 1. For any positive integer n, m and x, we have the following formula

    (k=n1Tmk(x))1=Tmn(x)Tmnm(x)

    Theorem 2. For any positive integer n, and x, we have the following formula

    (k=n1Uk(x))1=Un(x)Un1(x)1.

    Theorem 3. For any positive integer n, and x, we have the following formula

    (k=n1U2k(x))1=U2n(x)U2n1(x)1.

    With Falcón's enlightening, we can apply similar method into deduction of partial sums of Chebyshev polynomials. For convenient expression, we firstly set

    Gn(x)=Un1(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)Un+1(x)
    Mn(x)=Un2(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)Un(x)

    and obtain:

    Theorem 4. For any positive integer n,

    2n+1k=0k2Uk(x)=12(2n+1)U2n+1(x)Gn(x)+1+(n+1)U2n+2(x)+Mn(x).

    Theorem 5. For any positive integer n,

    2nk=0k2Tk(x)=12(2n+1)2U2n1(x)U2n(x)+2(n+1)2U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x).

    Theorem 6. For any positive integer n,

    2nk=0k3Tk(x)=4(n+1)3U2n+2(x)+12(2n+1)3U2n+1(x)Gn(x)(3n+32)U2n1(x)3nU2n(x)+3Mn(x)1.

    In order to prove the results of the infinite sums of reciprocal Chebyshev polynomials, several lemmas are needed.

    Let α=x+x21 and β=xx21, then we have the following lemmas.

    Lemma 1. For any positive integer n, we have

    U2n(x)=1+Un1(x)Un+1(x),
    U2n(x)=4x2+Un2(x)Un+2(x).

    Proof. From the definition of Chebyshev polynomials, we have

    U2n(x)Un1(x)Un+1(x)=(αn+1βn+1)2(αnβn)(αn+2βn+2)(αβ)2=α2n+2+β2n+2+α2+β22α2n+2β2n+2(αβ)2=1.U2n(x)Un2(x)Un+2(x)=(αn+1βn+1)2(αn1βn1)(αn+3βn+3)(αβ)2=α2n+2+β2n+2+α4+β42α2n+2β2n+2(αβ)2=(α+β)2=4x2.

    Lemma 2. For any positive integer n, we have

    T2n(x)=Tn1(x)Tn+1(x)+1x2,
    T2n(x)=Tn2(x)Tn+2(x)+4x2(1x2).

    Proof. From the definition of Chebyshev polynomials, we have

    T2n(x)Tn1(x)Tn+1(x)=14[(αn+βn)2(αn1+βn1)(αn+1+βn+1)]=14[α2+β22]=14(αβ)2=1x2.T2n(x)Tn2(x)Tn+2(x)=14[(αn+βn)2(αn2+βn2)(αn+2+βn+2)]=14[α2n+β2nα4β4+2α2nβ2n]=14(α+β)2(αβ)2=4x2(1x2).

    Lemma 3. For any positive integer n and m, we have

    Tn(Tm(x))=Tnm(x),
    Un(Tm(x))=Um(n+1)1(x)Um1(x).

    Proof. See Reference [12].

    Lemma 4. For any positive integer n and x, we have

    1Tn(x)+1Tn+1(x)<1Tn(x)Tn1(x)1Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x),1Tn(x)+1Tn+1(x)>1Tn(x)Tn1(x)+11Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)+1.

    Proof. The first inequality equivalent to

    Tn(x)+Tn+1(x)Tn(x)Tn+1(x)<Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)Tn(x)+Tn1(x)(Tn(x)Tn1(x))(Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)), (2.1)

    or

    [Tn(x)+Tn+1(x)](Tn(x)Tn1(x)+1)(Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)+1)<Tn(x)Tn+1(x)[Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)Tn(x)+Tn1(x)],

    Then we have

    T2n(x)Tn+2(x)+T2n+1(x)Tn1(x)<Tn1(x)Tn+2(x)Tn(x)+Tn1(x)Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x),

    applying Lemma 2, inequality (2.1) is equivalent to

    (1x2)[Tn1(x)+Tn+2(x)]<0. (2.2)

    For any positive x and n1, 1x2<0 and Tn1(x)+Tn+2(x)>0. Thus it is very easy to check inequality (2.2) is true. Similarly, we can consider the second inequality of Lemma 4. The second inequality is equivalent to

    Tn(x)+Tn+1(x)Tn(x)Tn+1(x)>Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)Tn(x)+Tn1(x)(Tn(x)Tn1(x)+1)(Tn+2(x)Tn+1(x)+1), (2.3)

    or

    T2n(x)Tn+2(x)Tn1(x)Tn(x)Tn+2(x)Tn1(x)Tn+1(x)Tn+2(x)+Tn(x)Tn+2(x)+Tn+1(x)Tn+2(x)+T2n+1(x)Tn1(x)T2n+1(x)+T2n(x)Tn(x)Tn1(x)Tn+1(x)Tn1(x)+Tn(x)+Tn+1(x)>0,

    applying Lemma 2, inequality (2.3) is equivalent to

    (Tn+1(x)(x21))Tn+2(x)(Tn(x)+(x21))Tn1(x)+Tn(x)+Tn+1(x)>0. (2.4)

    For any positive x and n1,

    (Tn+1(x)(x21))Tn+2(x)(Tn(x)+(x21))Tn1(x)>0

    Thus it is very easy to check inequality (2.4) is true.

    Lemma 5. For any positive integer n and x,

    1Un(x)+1Un+1(x)>1Un(x)Un1(x)1Un+2(x)Un+1(x),1Un(x)+1Un+1(x)<1Un(x)Un1(x)11Un+2(x)Un+1(x)1.

    Prove. The first inequality is equivalent to

    Un+1(x)+Un(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)>Un+2(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)(Un(x)Un1(x))(Un+2(x)Un+1(x)), (2.5)

    or

    [Un+1(x)+Un(x)](Un(x)Un1(x))(Un+2(x)Un+1(x))>Un+1(x)Un(x)[Un+2(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)],

    Then we have

    U2n(x)Un+2(x)+U2n+1(x)Un1(x)>Un(x)Un+2(x)Un1(x)+Un1(x)Un+1(x)Un+2(x),

    applying Lemma 1, inequality (2.5) is equivalent to

    Un+2(x)+Un1(x)>0. (2.6)

    For any positive x and n1, it is very easy to check inequality (2.6) is true. Similarly, we can consider the second inequality of Lemma 5.

    Un+1(x)+Un(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)<Un+2(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)(Un(x)Un1(x)1)(Un+2(x)Un+1(x)1), (2.7)

    or

    U2n(x)Un+2(x)Un1(x)Un(x)Un+2(x)Un1(x)Un+1(x)Un+2(x)Un(x)Un+2(x)Un+1(x)Un+2(x)+U2n+1(x)Un1(x)+U2n+1(x)U2n(x)+Un(x)Un1(x)+Un+1(x)Un1(x)+Un(x)+Un+1(x)<0,

    applying Lemma 1, inequality (2.7) equivalent to

    Un+2(x)+Un1(x)+Un(x)Un1(x)+Un(x)+Un+1(x)<Un+1(x)Un+2(x). (2.8)

    For any positive x and n1, it is very easy to check inequality (2.8) is true.

    Lemma 6. For any positive integers n and x, we have

    1U2n(x)+1U2n+1(x)>1U2n(x)U2n1(x)1U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x),1U2n(x)+1U2n+1(x)<1U2n(x)U2n1(x)11U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)1.

    Proof. The first inequality is equivalent to

    U2n(x)+U2n+1(x)U2n(x)U2n+1(x)>U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)U2n(x)+U2n1(x)(U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x))(U2n(x)U2n1(x)), (2.9)

    or

    [U2n(x)+U2n+1(x)](U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x))(U2n(x)U2n1(x))>U2n(x)U2n+1(x)[U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)U2n(x)+U2n1(x)],

    Then we have

    U4n(x)U2n+2(x)U2n(x)U2n+2(x)U2n1(x)U2n+1(x)U2n+2(x)U2n1(x)+U4n+1(x)U2n1(x)>0,

    applying Lemma 1, inequality (2.9) is equivalent to

    U2n+2(x)+2Un1(x)Un+1(x)U2n+2(x)+U2n1(x)+2Un(x)Un+2(x)U2n1(x)>0. (2.10)

    For any positive x and n1, it is very easy to check inequality (2.10) is true. Similarly, we can consider the second inequality of Lemma 6. The second inequality is equivalent to

    U2n(x)+U2n+1(x)U2n(x)U2n+1(x)<U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)U2n(x)+U2n1(x)(U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)1)(U2n(x)U2n1(x)1), (2.11)

    or

    U4n(x)U2n+2(x)U4n(x)U2n(x)U2n+2(x)U2n1(x)U2n+1(x)U2n+2(x)U2n1(x)+U4n+1(x)U2n1(x)+U2n(x)U2n1(x)+U2n+1(x)U2n1(x)U2n(x)U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)U2n+2(x)+U4n+1(x)+U2n(x)+U2n+1(x)<0,

    applying Lemma 1, inequality (2.11) is equivalent to

    U2n(x)U2n1(x)+U2n(x)+U2n+1(x)+U2n+2(x)+2Un1(x)Un+1(x)U2n+2(x)+U2n1(x)
    2Un(x)Un+2(x)U2n1(x)+2Un(x)Un+2(x)<U2n+1(x)U2n+2(x)+2Un1(x)Un+1(x). (2.12)

    For any positive x and n1, it is very easy to check inequality (2.12) is true.

    Aiming to prove the results of the partial sums of Chebyshev polynomials, the lemmas below are necessary.

    Lemma 7. For any positive integer n2

    Tn(x)=12Un(x)12Un2(x)nk=1Tk(x)=12Un(x)+12Un1(x)12

    Prove. The general term formula of Chebyshev polynomials is as follows

    Tn(x)=12[(x+x21)n+(xx21)n]Un(x)=12x21[(x+x21)n+1(xx21)n+1]

    For convenient proving, we set α=x+x21, β=xx21, and easily verify α+β=2x, αβ=1. Thus, according to the definition we get

    12Un(x)12Un2(x)=12(αn+1βn+1αβαn1βn1αβ)=12(αβ)[αn1(α21)βn1(β21)]=12(αβ)[αn1(α2αβ)βn1(β2αβ)]=12(αβ)[αn(αβ)+βn(αβ)]=12(αn+βn).

    This proves the first equation. And next we prove the second equation

    nk=1Tk(x)=12nk=2Uk(x)12nk=2Uk2(x)+T1(x)=12nk=2Uk(x)12n2k=0Uk(x)+T1(x)=12Un(x)+12Un1(x)T1(x)12+T1(x)=12Un(x)+12Un1(x)12.

    This proves Lemma 7.

    Lemma 8. For any positive integer n

    2nk=1Uk(x)=Un1(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)Un+1(x), (2.13)
    2n1k=1Uk(x)=Un2(x)Un(x)+Un1(x)Un(x). (2.14)

    Prove. In accordance of the general term formula of Chebyshev polynomials, it is not hard to get

    U2n+1(x)=Un(x)Un+1(x)Un(x)Un1(x),U2n+2(x)=U2n+1(x)Un+1(x)Un1(x)1,U2n+1(x)=Un+2(x)Un(x)+1.

    Easily test that when n=1, identical Eq (2.13) is right. Supposing that n=m, Eq (2.13) is right. Then when n=m+1,

    2m+2k=1Uk(x)=Um1(x)Um+1(x)+Um1(x)Um(x)+U2m+1(x)+U2m+2(x)=Um+1(x)Um(x)+U2m+11=Um(x)Um+2(x)+Um+1(x)Um(x).

    Applying mathematical induction, it is not hard to prove identical Eq (2.14). This proves Lemma 8.

    Lemma 9. For any positive integers n,

    2nk=0kTk(x)=12(2n+1)U2n1(x)+(n+1)U2n(x)Gn(x)2nk=0kUk(x)=12Un+1(x)+12Un(x)Gn(x)

    Prove. According to Lemma 7, we have

    n+1k=0Tk(x)=Un+1(x)+Un(x)+12.

    Through derivation on the left and right sides, we get

    nk=0(k+1)Uk(x)=Un+1(x)+Un(x)2.

    Applying Lemma 7 and Lemma 8, we obtain

    2nk=1kUk(x)=12U2n+1(x)+12U2n(x)2nk=1Uk(x)=12U2n+1(x)+12U2n(x)Gn(x)2nk=1kTk(x)=x+122nk=2kUk(x)122nk=2kUk2(x)=x+122nk=2kUk(x)122n2k=0(k+2)Uk(x)=(n+12)U2n1(x)+(n+1)U2n(x)2nk=1Uk(x)=(n+12)U2n1(x)+(n+1)U2n(x)Gn(x).

    This proves Lemma 9.

    In this section, we will prove our theorems. For the infinite sums of reciprocal Chebyshev polynomials, firstly we prove Theorem 1. For any positive integer n and x, using Lemma 4, we have

    k=n1Tk(x)=k=s(1T2k1(x)+1T2k(x))<k=s(1T2k1(x)T2k2(x)1T2k+1(x)T2k(x))=1Tn(x)Tn1(x)

    In the similar way, we have

    k=n1Tk(x)=k=s(1T2k1(x)+1T2k(x))>k=s(1T2k1(x)T2k2(x)+11T2k+1(x)T2k(x)+1)=1Tn(x)Tn1(x)+1.

    And then we have

    (k=n1Tk(x))1=Tn(x)Tn1(x)

    and then let x=Tm(x), according to Lemma 3, we can get

    (k=n1Tmk(x))1=Tmn(x)Tmnm(x)

    This proved Theorem 1.

    Next, Theorem 2 will be proved. For any positive integer n and x, using Lemma 5, we have

    k=n1Uk(x)=k=s(1U2k1(x)+1U2k(x))<k=s(1U2k1(x)U2k2(x)11U2k+1(x)U2k(x)1)=1Un(x)Un1(x)1.

    In the similar way, we have

    k=n1Uk(x)=k=s(1U2k1(x)+1U2k(x))>k=s(1U2k1(x)U2k2(x)1U2k+1(x)U2k(x))=1Un(x)Un1(x).

    And then we have

    Un(x)Un1(x)1<(k=n1Uk(x))1<Un(x)Un1(x).

    that is

    (k=n1Uk(x))1=Un(x)Un1(x)1.

    This proved Theorem 2.

    Then we shall prove Theorem 3. Using Lemma 6, we can get

    k=n1U2k(x)=k=s(1U22k1(x)+1U22k(x))<k=s(1U22k1(x)U22k2(x)11U22k+1(x)U22k(x)1)=1U2n(x)U2n1(x)1.

    In the similar way, we have

    k=n1U2k(x)=k=s(1U22k1(x)+1U22k(x))>k=s(1U22k1(x)U22k2(x)1U22k+1(x)U22k(x))=1U2n(x)U2n1(x)

    and then we can get

    (k=n1U2k(x))1=U2n(x)U2n1(x)1.

    This proved Theorem 3.

    For the partial sums of Chebyshev polynomials, firstly we shall prove Theorem 4. According to Lemma 9, we have

    2n+2k=0kTk(x)=12(2n+3)U2n+1(x)+(n+2)U2n+2(x)Gn+1(x)

    Through simultaneous derivation on the left and right sides, we deduce

    2n+1k=1k2Uk1(x)=12(2n+3)U2n+1(x)+(n+2)U2n+2(x)Gn(x).

    According to Lemma 8 and Lemma 9 we get

    2n+1k=0k2Uk(x)=2n+2k=1k2Uk1(x)22n+1k=1kUk(x)2n+1k=0Uk(x)=2n+2k=1k2Uk1(x)22n+1k=1(k+1)Uk(x)+2n+1k=0Uk(x)=(n+12)U2n+1(x)+(n+1)U2n+2(x)Gn(x)+Mn(x)+1.

    Applying Lemma 7 and Lemma 8, we get

    2nk=0k2Tk(x)=x+122nk=2k2Uk(x)122nk=2k2Uk2(x)=x+122nk=2k2Uk(x)122n2k=0(k+2)2Uk(x).

    Simplify the above, we have

    2nk=0k2Tk(x)=12(2n+1)2U2n1(x)+2(n+1)2U2n+2(x)U2n+1(x)U2n(x)

    This proved Theorem 4 and Theorem 5.

    Theorem 6 shall be proved below. According to Lemma 7 and Lemma 8, we have

    2nk=0k3Tk(x)=x+122nk=2k3Uk(x)122nk=2k3Uk2(x)=x+122nk=2k3Uk(x)122n2k=0(k+2)3Uk(x)=2n2k=2(3k2+6k+4)Uk(x)+12(2n+1)3Un(x)+4(n+1)3U2n+2(x)26x4=4(n+1)3U2n+2(x)+12(2n+1)3U2n+1(x)Gn(x)(3n+32)U2n1(x)3nU2n(x)+3Mn(x)1.

    This proved Theorem 6.

    In this paper, the infinite sums of reciprocals and the partial sums derived from Chebyshev polynomials are studied. For the infinite sums of reciprocals, we apply the floor function to the reciprocals of these sums to obtain Theorem 1, Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 involving the Chebyshev polynomials. Simultaneously, we get Theorem 4, Theorem 5 and Theorem 6 about the partial sums of Chebyshev polynomials by the relation of two types of Chebyshev polynomials. Our results can enrich the related research domain with respect to orthogonal polynomials and recursive sequences. Besides, the results are hoped to be applied into other branches of mathematics or other disciplines out of mathematics.

    The authors would like to thank Xi'an Shiyou University for the support of this research.

    The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Abakah EJA, Gil-Alana LA, Madigu G, et al. (2020) Volatility persistence in cryptocurrency markets under structural breaks. Int Rev Econ Financ 69: 680−691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.035 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.035
    [2] Agyei-Ampomah S (2011) Stock market integration in Africa. Manage Financ 37: 242−256. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351111113306 doi: 10.1108/03074351111113306
    [3] Akyildirim E, Cepni O, Molnár P, et al. (2022) Connectedness of energy markets around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Econ 109: 105900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105900 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105900
    [4] Asadi M, Roubaud D, Tiwari AK (2022) Volatility spillovers amid crude oil, natural gas, coal, stock, and currency markets in the US and China based on time and frequency domain connectedness. Energy Econ 109: 105961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105961 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105961
    [5] Bae KH, Zhang X (2015) The cost of stock market integration in Emerging Markets. Asia−Pacific J Financ Stud 44: 1−23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12079 doi: 10.1111/ajfs.12079
    [6] Baruník J, Kočenda E, Vácha L (2016) Asymmetric connectedness on the U.S. stock market: Bad and good volatility spillovers. J Financ Mark 27: 55−78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2015.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2015.09.003
    [7] Bauwens L, Laurent S (2005) A new class of multivariate skew densities, with application to generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 23: 346−354. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500104000000523 doi: 10.1198/073500104000000523
    [8] Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1995) Time-varying world market integration. J Financ 50: 403−444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04790.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04790.x
    [9] Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo AW, et al. (2012) Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J Financ Econ 104: 535−559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.010
    [10] Bouri E, Demirer R, Gabauer D, et al. (2022) Financial market connectedness: The role of investors' happiness. Financ Res Lett 44: 102075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102075 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102075
    [11] Chen Y, Xu J, Hu M (2022) Asymmetric volatility spillovers and dynamic correlations between crude oil price, exchange rate and gold price in BRICS. Resour Policy 78: 102857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102857 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102857
    [12] Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2012) Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. Int J Forecast 28: 57−66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
    [13] Engle RF (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 20: 339−350.
    [14] Fratzscher M (2002) Financial market integration in Europe: On the effects of EMU on stock markets. Int J Financ Econ 7: 165−193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.187 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.187
    [15] Geng JB, Chen FR, Ji Q, et al. (2021) Network connectedness between natural gas markets, uncertainty and stock markets. Energy Econ 95: 105001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105001 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105001
    [16] Gong C, Tang P, Wang Y (2019) Measuring the network connectedness of global stock markets. Physica A 535: 122351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122351 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122351
    [17] Goodell JW, Yadav MP, Ruan J, et al. (2023) Traditional assets, digital assets and renewable energy: Investigating connectedness during COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war. Financ Res Lett 58, 104323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104323 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104323
    [18] Horváth R, Petrovski D (2013) International stock market integration: Central and South Eastern Europe compared. Econ Systems 37: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2012.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2012.07.004
    [19] Hunter DM (2006) The evolution of stock market integration in the post-liberalization period – A look at Latin America. J Int Money Financ 25: 795–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.06.001
    [20] Ji Q, Bouri E, Lau CKM, et al. (2019) Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. Int Rev Financ Anal 63: 257−272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.002
    [21] Ji Q, Zhang D, Geng JB (2018) Information linkage, dynamic spillovers in prices and volatility between the carbon and energy markets. J Clean Prod 198: 972–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.126 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.126
    [22] Jiang S, Li Y, Lu Q, et al. (2022) Volatility communicator or receiver? Investigating volatility spillover mechanisms among Bitcoin and other financial markets. Res Int Bus Financ 59: 101543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101543 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101543
    [23] Koutmos D (2018) Return and volatility spillovers among cryptocurrencies. Econ Lett 173: 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.004
    [24] Liang Q, Lu Y, Li Z (2020) Business connectedness or market risk? Evidence from financial institutions in China. China Econ Rev 62: 101503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101503 doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101503
    [25] McMillan DG, Speight AEH (2010) Return and volatility spillovers in three euro exchange rates. J Econ Bus 62: 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2009.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2009.08.003
    [26] Mensi W, Al-Yahyaee KH, Kang SH (2019) Structural breaks and double long memory of cryptocurrency prices: A comparative analysis from Bitcoin and Ethereum. Financ Res Lett 29: 222−230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.07.011 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.07.011
    [27] Papathanasiou S, Dokas I, Koutsokostas D (2022) Value investing versus other investment strategies: A volatility spillover approach and portfolio hedging strategies for investors. N Am J Econ Financ 62: 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101764 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2022.101764
    [28] Papathanasiou S, Kenourgios D, Koutsokostas D, et al. (2023) Can treasury inflation‑protected securities safeguard investors from outward risk spillovers? A portfolio hedging strategy through the prism of COVID-19. J Asset Manage 24: 198−211. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-022-00292-y doi: 10.1057/s41260-022-00292-y
    [29] Papathanasiou S, Vasiliou D, Magoutas A, et al. (2024) The dynamic connectedness between private equities and other high-demand financial assets: A portfolio hedging strategy during COVID-19. Aust J Manage forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231184658
    [30] Reboredo JC, Ugolini A (2020) Price connectedness between green bond and financial markets. Econ Model 88: 25−38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.004
    [31] Sadorsky P (2012) Correlations and volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies. Energ Econ 34: 248−255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.006
    [32] Samitas A, Papathanasiou S, Koutsokostas D, et al. (2022a) Are timber and water investments safe-havens? A volatility spillover approach and portfolio hedging strategies for investors. Financ Res Lett 47: 102657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102657 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102657
    [33] Samitas A, Papathanasiou S, Koutsokostas D, et al. (2022b) Volatility spillovers between fine wine and major global markets during COVID-19: A portfolio hedging strategy for investors. Int Rev Econ Financ 78: 629−642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.01.009
    [34] Savva CS, Aslanidis N (2010) Stock market integration between new EU member states and the Euro-zone. Empir Econ 39: 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0306-6 doi: 10.1007/s00181-009-0306-6
    [35] So MKP, Chu AMY, Chan TWC (2021) Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on financial market connectedness. Financ Res Lett 38: 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101864 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101864
    [36] Tsuji C (2018) Return transmission and asymmetric volatility spillovers between oil futures and oil equities: New DCC-MEGARCH analyses. Econ Model 74: 167−185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.05.007
    [37] Tsuji C (2020) Correlation and spillover effects between the US and international banking sectors: New evidence and implications for risk management. Int Rev Financ Anal 70: 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101392 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101392
    [38] Virk N, Javed F (2017) European equity market integration and joint relationship of conditional volatility and correlations. J Int Money Financ 71: 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.10.007
    [39] Wang P, Moore T (2008) Stock market integration for the transition economies: Time-varying conditional correlation approach. The Manchester School 76: 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01083.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01083.x
    [40] Wu F (2020) Stock market integration in East and Southeast Asia: The role of global factors. Int Rev Financ Anal 67: 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101416 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101416
    [41] Yilmaz K (2010) Return and volatility spillovers among the East Asian equity markets. J Asian Econ 21: 304−313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.001
    [42] Zhang D (2017) Oil shocks and stock markets revisited: Measuring connectedness from a global perspective. Energy Econ 62: 323−333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.009
    [43] Zhang D, Broadstock DC (2020) Global financial crisis and rising connectedness in the international commodity markets. Int Rev Financ Anal 68: 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.08.003
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1160) PDF downloads(102) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(8)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog