TSSC (°Brix) |
TA (g malic a./L) |
FF (N) |
C* (Chroma) |
TSSC/TA | |
Pescabivona var. Settembrina | 12.93 ± 0.40 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 27.60 ± 0.53 | 71.83 |
Pescabivona is a highly appreciated fruit by consumers for its sweet flavour and juicy flesh; however, it has a short shelf life and is susceptible to postharvest damage, such as mechanical injury, loss of texture and alteration of organoleptic properties. Therefore, it's necessary to develop new methods of processing and conservation for this fruit. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of tray-drying in white peach slices and cubes at 70 ℃ for 12 hours in order to extend their shelf-life and increase its commercial availability over a long period and to obtain a new food product. The physicochemical and sensory properties of dried fruits were assessed during 30 days of storage in polyamide/polyethene (PA/PE) bags containing two gas mixtures (treatments): MAP-N2 (100% N2) and MAP-P (78% N2, 21% O2 and 0.04% CO2), at room temperature (20 ± 1 ℃). Both MAP treatments kept the fruit firmness, with MAP-P slightly more effective. Slicing produced fruit with a good appearance and firmness, while cubing produced sweet fruit with a caramel flavour and a chewier firmness. In addition, packing with MAP-N2 reduced the phenomenon of fruit browning. Overall, this study provides significant information on the drying process (time-temperature treatments) and packaging techniques (MAP) of white-fleshed peach to obtain a novel food product.
Citation: Pasquale Roppolo, Ilenia Tinebra, Roberta Passafiume, Alessio Allegra, Giuseppe Sortino, Paolo Inglese, Vittorio Farina. Tray-drying is a new way to valorise white-fleshed peach fruit[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 944-961. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023050
[1] | Giorgia Liguori, Giuseppe Sortino, Giuseppe Gianguzzi, Paolo Inglese, Vittorio Farina . Evaluation of quality attributes and consumer preference of fresh or imported mangoes in Italy. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(4): 426-440. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.426 |
[2] | Paula Viola Salvador, Randi Phinney, Karolina Östbring, Lucas Tivana, Marilyn Rayner, Federico Gómez Galindo, Henrik Davidsson . Minimizing post-harvest waste of mango in rural Mozambique—The effect of different solar setups in mango drying. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 58-73. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025004 |
[3] | Mohammad Zahirul Islam, Young-Tack Lee, Mahmuda Akter Mele, In-Lee Choi, Ho-Min Kang . Effect of fruit size on fruit quality, shelf life and microbial activity in cherry tomatoes. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 340-348. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.340 |
[4] | Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Clandio Medeiros da Silva, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Maria Isabel Florentino Ferreira, Iohann Metzger Bauchrowitz, Jeferson Benedetti Eilert, José dos Santos Neto . Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of plums accesses (Prunus salicina). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(1): 101-112. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.101 |
[5] | Alaika Kassim, Tilahun S. Workneh, Mark D. Laing . A review of the postharvest characteristics and pre-packaging treatments of citrus fruit. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 337-364. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.337 |
[6] | Gullo Gregorio, Dattola Antonio, Zappia Rocco . Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 658-671. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.658 |
[7] | Dalva Paulus, Sintieli Borges Ferreira, Dislaine Becker . Preservation and post-harvest quality of okra using low density polyethylene. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 321-336. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021020 |
[8] | Stefano Puccio, Anna Perrone, Giuseppe Sortino, Giuseppe Gianguzzi, Carla Gentile, Vittorio Farina . Yield, pomological characteristics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in mediterranean climate. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 592-603. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.592 |
[9] | María Cristina García-Muñoz, Martha Patricia Tarazona Diaz, Andrea Carolina Duarte Morales . Treatment effects on the quality and shelf life of the cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) Corpoica Andina. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 887-903. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024048 |
[10] | Salvatore D’Aquino, Daniela Satta, Luciano De Pau, Amedeo Palma . Effect of a cold quarantine treatment on physiological disorders and quality of cactus pear fruit. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 114-126. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.114 |
Pescabivona is a highly appreciated fruit by consumers for its sweet flavour and juicy flesh; however, it has a short shelf life and is susceptible to postharvest damage, such as mechanical injury, loss of texture and alteration of organoleptic properties. Therefore, it's necessary to develop new methods of processing and conservation for this fruit. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of tray-drying in white peach slices and cubes at 70 ℃ for 12 hours in order to extend their shelf-life and increase its commercial availability over a long period and to obtain a new food product. The physicochemical and sensory properties of dried fruits were assessed during 30 days of storage in polyamide/polyethene (PA/PE) bags containing two gas mixtures (treatments): MAP-N2 (100% N2) and MAP-P (78% N2, 21% O2 and 0.04% CO2), at room temperature (20 ± 1 ℃). Both MAP treatments kept the fruit firmness, with MAP-P slightly more effective. Slicing produced fruit with a good appearance and firmness, while cubing produced sweet fruit with a caramel flavour and a chewier firmness. In addition, packing with MAP-N2 reduced the phenomenon of fruit browning. Overall, this study provides significant information on the drying process (time-temperature treatments) and packaging techniques (MAP) of white-fleshed peach to obtain a novel food product.
Abbreviations: MAP: modified atmosphere packaging; S: slices; C: cubes; MAP-N2: active MAP; MAP-P: passive MAP; LD: longitudinal diameter; TD: transverse diameter; C*: chroma; ∆E: colour differences; BI: browning index; %DR: dry residue; FF: firmness; TSSC: total soluble solids contents; TA: titratable acidity.
The peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) is the second most cultivated fruit in the world. Within the European Union (EU), Italy is the leader in peach production. In northern Italy, mainly in Emilia-Romagna, nectarines represent 50% of new orchards, while in southern Italy peaches are preferred. At the end of the 1970's the peach industry in Sicily was still based on clingstone white fleshed local types, called "montagnole" (fruits of the mountains), nectarine-type, white-fleshed, named "Sbergie" and flat-type named "Tabacchiere" [1]. In the '90s, peach and nectarine cultivars were introduced from the USA, consequently, a renewal of Sicilian orchards started [2]. In any case, white-fleshed peaches remain an important part of Sicilian production. In particular, Pescabivona, also known as "Pesca di Bivona, " is an indigenous cultivar grown only in its original area, the Bivona area, located in the Middle-West Sicily [3]. Pescabivona includes four native varieties: Murtiddara (also known as Primizia Bianca), Bianca, Agostina and Settembrina. These varieties ripen at different times, from late June (Murtiddara) to late September (Settembrina) [4]. The Pescabivona cultivation area falls within the Sicani Mountains and includes the territories of Bivona, Alessandria della Rocca, Santo Stefano Quisquina and San Biagio Platani, in the province of Agrigento and Palazzo Adriano, in the province of Palermo [5]. Pescabivona obtained protected geographical indication (PGI) certification in 2014, and the product specification indicates peach fruits with a white non-melting flesh, characterized by a spheroidal shape and a creamy-yellow background skin colour with an extent of red over coloration (50%) for Murtiddara, followed by Agostina and Settembrina (40%) [6]. In addition, Settembrina has a peculiar red stripe along the suture line, due to a mutation involving the epidermal layer [7]. Its flavour is sweet and aromatic. Its odour stands out from the peaches produced in the rest of Sicily and Italy, due to its inebriating and persistent nature [5]. Furthermore, Pescabivona is highly valued for its organoleptic properties and high firmness. In fact, the fruit has been classified as non-melt, with sugar and phenolic content, finding considerable interest from the local market and large-scale organized distribution [8]. On the other hand, white fleshed peaches soften rapidly after commercial ripening, are very susceptible to chilling injuries and can be easily damaged during storage [9].
Peach is a climacteric fruit and, after harvest, numerous physiological and metabolic processes (respiration, transpiration, flesh softening, etc.) continue in it, drastically increasing ethylene production at a rate closely related to the storage temperature [10]. Being a white-fleshed peach, the main critical problems found on Pescabivona are related to strong seasonality, reduced fruit shelf-life, enzymatic browning, susceptibility to cold and handling damage [5,11]. Ripening time influences dramatically fruit quality and, for this reason, it is important to individuate the optimal period [12]. Recently, several postharvest treatments have been studied to reduce and limit cold damage, including the application of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, 1-methylcyclopropene, controlled atmosphere, ozone and radiation [13,14,15]. In addition, techniques such as refrigeration are nonresolving and limit shelf-life due to the possible development of pathogens and damage caused by low temperatures, as well as the considerable environmental impact they cause, in some cases reducing consumer's purchasing intention [16,17,18,19]. Today, consumers also prefer to buy fruit close to physiological ripeness, when there is maximum expression of the sensory and organoleptic profile [20]. This creates technical problems related to reduced shelf-life due to senescence, increased waste due to microbial spoilage and altered visual appearance of fruit.
Post-harvest waste of fruit and vegetables is alarming and represents a major challenge in the food supply chain due to its negative social, economic and environmental impact [21]. It is estimated that 20-60% of total production and many fruit and vegetables are lost and wasted along the food chain [22,23]. Among the possible techniques to prevent post-harvest losses of white-fleshed peaches, also given their seasonality and short shelf life, is tray-drying [24]. In addition, recent studies have reported a significant increase in the consumption of dried fruit, due to the many benefits of regular consumption of these products [25,26,27]. In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for these products in their many formats (mixes, bars, single portions, etc.), which are well suited to the different needs of consumers [28].
Drying is an old method based on the partial or total reduction of water content in the form of steam to a final concentration (10-14% RH) that ensures microbial stability and improves shelf life [29]. The drying treatment also leads to the breakdown of cell structures and the loss of membrane semi-permeability, resulting in a change in rheological properties. In fact, the outer layers of the dried matrix become rigid and protein aggregation takes place [30]. However, structural changes depend on the drying method and the residual moisture in the plant tissue. Drying processes influence the colour, flavour, texture and functional properties of fruit [24,31]. The oldest drying method is exposure to the sun, which allows a product with good quality characteristics but prone to environmental contamination [32], as well as being an extremely slow process. Using machines, however, heat invests the whole fruit or pieces/slices by conduction, convection and radiation [33,34]. Hot-air drying is an alternative method that yields a qualitatively superior product using low temperatures and short processing times [35].
The basis of the drying process, along with the healthy element, the taste experience and the convenience of consumption, environmentally friendly preservation systems must be implemented that promote food shelf life and safety. Dried products must also be stored properly to maintain their quality and nutritional characteristics for a prolonged period.
Among the different storage systems, MAP, maintains the qualitative characteristics of perishable products for a prolonged shelf life [36,37,38]. The principle behind MAP is to replace the atmosphere surrounding a product before sealing by mixing carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen (the most commonly used gases) at different concentrations. The modified atmosphere is useful because it reduces the oxidation of food products and, consequently, the production of compounds that cause the loss of colour, aroma and taste [39]. The use of inert gases, such as nitrogen, not only prevents package collapse but also helps prevent microbial growth, which is another factor contributing to product degradation [40]. Several studies [24,41] have shown that MAP treatments with 100% N2 limit significant nonenzymatic browning, while maintaining weight and firmness characteristics over a long storage period.
This work aims to investigate the effects of hot-air drying technique and MAP during 30 days of storage on the quality of slices and cubes of white-fleshed peaches. In this way, it is intended to enhance a fruit that is highly susceptible to post-harvest damage, prolonging its shelf life and allowing a wider commercial distribution. At the same time, it is also aimed at using fruit that does not conform to commercial standards to reduce waste.
Peach fruits (Prunus persica Batsch) cv. Pescabivona var. Settembrina, ready to consumption with typical taste (sweetness ≥ 10 °Brix), colour (overcolour ≤ 50%) and texture (≥34.3 N)were used [42]. The fruits were harvested at the "Soletta" Farm, located in the city of Castronovo di Sicilia (PA) (37°40'27.98"N; 13°39'12.55"E, 371m a.s.l.). After harvest, the fruits were stored at 5 ± 1℃ and after 24 h were subjected to analysis. Pomological characterization of was carried out on a sample of 20 fresh fruits.
Due to the lack of literature data, several preliminary tests on drying peach fruit were conducted to find the right time/temperature combination and whether to dry the fruit with or without the peel. For this reason, the initial preliminary test involved unpeeled fruit, dried for 12 h at 70 ℃. However, although the time/temperature combination proved to be effective in terms of maintaining organoleptic and sensory characteristics, it was found that the presence of the epicarp, after drying, causes excessive wrinkling, resulting in an uneven and aesthetically unappealing product (data not shown). Hence, the definitive experimental protocol involved the use of fruit peeled and dried for 12 h at 70℃.
The whole fruits were washed and sanitized with distilled water (20 ± 5 ℃) and 200 μL-L NaClO (5-6.5% NaClO solution, CHEMLAB) for 10 min. Then, the fruits were peeled, de-stoned and cut with a curved knife to a thickness of 5 ± 0.5 mm as follows:
• Slices (S)
• Cubes (C)
To prevent browning, the fruit were dipped in natural anti-browning agents [43], for 2 min. The antioxidant solution was obtained by dissolving citric acid (99.5-101% C6H8O7.1H2O, CHEMLAB) and ascorbic acid (99+% C6H8O6, CHEMLAB) in distilled water at concentrations of 0.5 g/0.5 L. drying process was conducted by means of a convective hot-air dryer operating at constant temperature. The dryer consists of a stainless-steel chamber (86 cm x 86 cm x 76 cm) provided with an electric heater to heat the air and a centrifugal fan to feed the airflow and recirculate it. The samples were put on the grids of mesh of size 0.01 m x 0.01 m in the dryer and, after that, they are dried at 70℃ for 12 h at a centrifugal fixed air velocity of 2.3 m/s until the relative humidity was constant(14-16%R.H.), according to Diaz [44] and Kesbi [45]. Dried fruits were stored in MAP and specifically, two treatments were applied to understand the effect of modified atmosphere packaging:
• MAP-N2 (100% N2);
• MAP-P (78% N2, 21% O2 and 0.04% CO2).
The samples were packed in polyamide/polyethylene bags composed of 80% polyamide and 20% polyethylene, with a thickness of 90 µm and a volume of 500 cm3, with an oxygen permeability of 47.6 cm2/(m2 day atm) and a water vapor transmission rate of 3.9 g/(m2 day atm) [46]. A modified atmosphere was obtained inside the sealed bags, using a digitally controlled packaging machine (VM 16 Orved S.p.A, Musile di Piave, Venezia, Italy).
Each bag contained 100 g of dried fruit divided according to the type of cut and treatment:
• MAP-packed cubes (MAP-N2 C)
• MAP-packed slices (MAP-N2 S)
• MAP-P packed cubes (MAP-P C)
• MAP-P packed slices (MAP-P S)
Samples were stored at room temperature (20 ± 1℃) for 30 days and analyses were performed every 10 days (D10; D20; D30).
Fresh weight (FW-g) was measured with a precision electronic scale (Gibertini EU-C 2002 RS, Novate Milanese, Italy), while fruit longitudinal diameter (LD-mm) and fruit transverse diameter (TD-mm) were measured with a digital calliper (Turoni TR53307, Forli, Italy). The colour of the fruit was determined based on the CIE L*a*b* colour system [brightness (L*); red/green (a*); yellow/blue (b*)] by means of digital colorimeter (CR-400 Chroma Meter, Minolta, Japan). Colorimeter calibration was performed against a white plate (illuminants C: Y ¼ 89.53, x ¼ 0.3247, y ¼ 0.3198) before each measurement. For each sample, the parameters L*, a* and b* were measured and the averages of all measurements were determined for each package. Chroma (C*) values, which indicate the quantitative attribute of colour intensity, have been calculated using Equations (1), to characterize fresh sample: [47]:
C∗=√(a2+b2) | (1) |
Total colour difference (ΔE), between the colour of fresh fruit and that of the fruit after drying for both types of cut were measured at D0, following the Equation (2) [47]:
ΔE=√(L∗−L∗0)2+(a∗−a∗0)2+(b∗−b∗0)2 | (2) |
where L*0, a*0 and b*0 represent lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) of the samples after drying, respectively. In addition, the browning index (BI) at each observation during the 30 days of storage was measured with the following Equation (3) [48]:
BI=(x−0.31)0.17×100 | (3) |
where x=(a∗+1.75L∗)/(5.645L∗+a∗−0.3012b∗).
The firmness (FF) of the slices and cubes was measured using a durometer (Durofel Agrosta 100 Field, Serqueux, France) and converted to Newtons using Equation (4) [49]:
N=9,8(eDurofel−59.3214.89) | (4) |
Total soluble solids content (TSSC) was measured by means of digital refractometer (Atago, Tokyo, Japan) and the values were expressed as °Brix; while titratable acidity (TA g/L−1 malic acid) was measured with a pH meter-titrator (Titromatic 1S, Crison, Barcelona, Spain) and expressed as grams of malic acid per litre of fruit juice (g L−1 malic acid) using 5 mL of juice diluted in 45 mL of distilled water. The dried fruit was checked for drying efficiency (DR%), which was calculated using Equation (5) [50] :
%DR=(c−a)(b−a)×100, | (5) |
where:
a = weight of the empty tray
b = weight of the tray with the product before drying
c = weight of the tray with the product after drying
Sensory evaluation was carried out by a team of 30 judges with good training and knowledge in this type of food evaluation [51], following the guidelines of UNI 10957:2003 [52]. During the preliminary test, 15 qualitative descriptors were chosen for sensory profiling, generated on the basis of citation frequency (>60%) and listed below: visual appearance (VA); firmness (FR); peach odour (PO); honey odour (HO); off-odour (OO); acidity (AC); sweetness (SW); bitterness (BT); juiciness (J); crispness (CR); rubberness (RU); peach flavour (PF); caramel flavour (CF); off-flavour (OF); degree of browning (B). The evaluation was conducted from 10 to 12.00 in a room with white lights. Each judge received, in random order, a sample of three pieces of fruit, by cut and treatment. Between each sample, water was provided to rinse the mouth. The judges rated the intensity of each descriptor on a hedonic scale by assigning a score between 1 and 9, where: 1 - no sensation, 2 - scarcely discernible, 3 - very low, 4 - low, 5 - slight, 6 - moderate, 7 - intense, 8 - very intense and 9 - extremely intense [53].
Using the XLSTAT software (Addinsoft, Paris, France), repeated measures ANOVAs and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests (p≤0.05) were performed for all parameters studied to assess significant differences between the treatments and days of storage.
A preliminary physicochemical characterization was carried out on a sample of 20 fresh fruit before drying (Table 1).
TSSC (°Brix) |
TA (g malic a./L) |
FF (N) |
C* (Chroma) |
TSSC/TA | |
Pescabivona var. Settembrina | 12.93 ± 0.40 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 27.60 ± 0.53 | 71.83 |
From the obtained data, it can be said that peach fruits are sweet and low in acidity, with an intense coloration tending toward yellow/orange, according to Montevecchi et al. [54]. Crisosto et al. [55] demonstrated a higher acceptance of grapes with a high TSSC/TA (greater than 25.0) among U.S. consumers. From the obtained data, the TSSC/TA ratio reached 73.83 confirming a degree of ripeness close to consumption and therefore closer to consumer preferences. These data have been considered important to determine the initial characteristics of the fruit and the differences between fresh and dried products.
During the drying process, longitudinal (LD) and transverse (TD) diameter values decreased in both types of cuts (slices and cubes). The porous and hygroscopic nature of fruits and vegetables makes them highly shrinkable during drying [56].
As shown in Table 2, before drying, the peach slices had a length dimension (LD) of 57.57 mm and a width dimension (TD) of 25.20 mm. After drying, these values decreased to 49.80 mm and 19.28 mm, respectively, representing a significant reduction in LD of 13.49% (p < 0.01) and TD of 23.49% (p < 0.001). Similarly, in cubes the values also decreased, with a reduction of 24.29 % (p < 0.001) in LD and 24.55 % (p < 0.001) in TD. Although no significant variation was observed for TD between the two cuts, LD was reduced (10.8% more) in the cubes. This was due to the shape and physical structure of the samples. The slices probably retained their LD due to the even distribution of heat stress they were subjected to. By comparing these data with %DR, a loss of water content of 84.57% and 83.64% was observed for S and C, respectively. For the same thickness, a higher dry efficiency was observed for slices than for cubes, probably due to the greater surface area exposed during drying.
(a) | Slice (S) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 57.57 ± 1.71 | 25.20 ± 1.81 |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ns | 19.28 ± 3.23ab |
D10 MAP-P | 48.46 ± 4.61 | 20.92 ± 1.40a |
D20 MAP-P | 49.60 ± 6.02 | 19.75 ± 2.43a |
D30 MAP-P | 46.00 ± 2.49* | 17.30 ± 2.94b |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ab | 19.28 ± 3.23a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 50.87 ± 5.89a | 19.75 ± 2.01a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 45.45 ± 7.49bc | 18.60 ± 2.35a |
D30 MAP-N2 | 41.80 ± 4.84c, * | 16.15 ± 3.86b |
(b) | Cubes (C) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 36.07 ± 1.36 | 24.56 ± 1.13 |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43ab |
D10 MAP-P | 25.33 ± 4.06ab | 19.95 ± 3.74a |
D20 MAP-P | 23.60 ± 2.60b | 16.90 ± 1.97bc |
D30 MAP-P | 22.65 ± 6.29bc | 15.45 ± 3.09c |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 24.81 ± 4.81ab | 19.59 ± 3.29a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 21.75 ± 4.95b | 15.20 ± 2.38b |
D30 MAP-N2 | 23.40 ± 4.62bc | 15.15 ± 1.73b |
During the 30-day storage period, the LD and TD diameters further decreased. Storage of the samples in MAP showed a significant decrease in LD in both cuts and only for MAP-P S was not significant (p > 0.05). In addition, a significant difference was observed between MAP-P and MAP-N2 treatments at the end of the storage period (D30). Specifically, in the slice, the LD decreased by 3.80 mm in samples stored in MAP-P and by 8 mm in those stored in MAP-N2, showing that, for the type of cut, storage in MAP-P is more suitable (p = 0.01). In the cubes, no significant changes were observed between the two MAPs treatments to D30. In fact, the LD decreased by 4.66 mm in samples stored in MAP-P and 3.91 mm in those stored in MAP-N2.
Similarly, changes were observed for TD during the 30-day storage period. In the slices, a significant decrease of 1.98 mm was observed in the samples stored in MAP-P and 3.13 mm in the samples stored in MAP-N2. Whereas, in the cubes, the reduction was 3.08 mm in MAP-P and 3.38 mm in MAP-N2. There was no significant effect of MAP treatment on transverse diameter reduction in any of the cuts throughout the storage period (p > 0.05).
For slices, treatment with MAP-P seems to have been more appropriate, as it caused a smaller reduction in LD than treatment with MAP-N2. In cubes, on the other hand, both MAP-P and MAP-N2 appear to be equally effective because no significant changes were found in the reduction of transverse diameter.
The results indicate that the drying process influences LD and TD reduction while storage in modified atmosphere had no significant influence.
One of the main changes affecting the structure of plant tissues during drying is the change in firmness [57]. The removal of water content from the fruit during the drying process results in a loss of the volume and weight, as well as a change in mechanical properties, such as hardness and crispness [58]. Fruit firmness is one of the most important quality properties, as it influences the acceptability of the fruit to consumers [59]. Manrique et al. and Mafra et al. [60,61] report that changes in fruit texture are largely determined by changes in the structure of the fruit cell wall and polysaccharides in the middle lamella.
After the drying process, there was the same significant increase of 0.1 N firmness (p < 0.001) in both cuts (0.30 N) compared to the fresh fruit (0.20 N). This could be due to drying, through the removal of water from the fruit tissues, increasing the concentration of solutes within the cells, causing them to become more compact and less susceptible to deformation [62]. However, it is important to consider that firmness values may also depend on other factors, such as the type of fruit, degree of ripeness, temperature and drying time used during the process [63]. Considering ripe peach for consumption, the increase of 0.1 N can be perceived as a positive result for handling and transport because it indicates a greater resistance to pressure and a greater ability of the fruit to maintain its shape and integrity [64]. However, it is also important to consider consumer preferences to determine if this result is also desirable for the market. For example, a study by Wong et al [65] showed that Korean consumers prefer apple-based dried fruit produced in South Korea with a crunchy firmness, while they prefer pear-based dried fruit produced in the United States with a soft, chewy firmness. Therefore, dried fruit companies should take these preferences into account when developing new products for different markets.
During the 30-day storage period, as can be seen from the results (Figure 1), the firmness (FF) of peach fruits varied significantly for MAP-N2 C, MAP-P S and MAP-N2 S treatments, although the S values were slightly higher than C values. However, no significant loss of firmness was found for S and C at the end of the 30-day storage period. Moreover, when comparing the two MAP treatments during the observations (D10, D20 and D30), significance was only found for the cut. The data show that although at D10 the MAP-N2 packing positively influenced the maintenance of fruit firmness, the same behaviour was observed with the MAP-P treatment from D20 and D30. For this reason, we can state that storage in MAP-N2 is not cost-effective for the Pescabivona supply chain.
The obtained data through the evaluation of firmness evolution can be compared with what emerged from the sensory analysis. As can be seen from Figure 4, firmness, as perceived through the FR descriptor, is evaluated positively for the entire storage period. In particular, the MAP-P S treatment maintains the values up to D30.
Similar results were reported by Tinebra et al. on behaviour of dried loquats [24]. Wu et al. [66] studied the firmness maintenance in dried fruit seeds, showing that N2 plays a key role in maintaining organoleptic qualities. A study on the importance of N2 was conducted on pomegranate arils [36], according to which, MAP was used to maintain the quality of the processed fruit and showed optimal results in terms of weight retention, which allowed the pulp structure to remain intact. A slight decrease in fruit firmness was observed during the storage period, attributable to the loss of turgor [35] and compensated by hardening due to drying. The results obtained are satisfactory when compared to studies conducted on peaches, pears and apricot [24], which lose up to 99% of their firmness values following drying.
The drying of fruit results not only in changes in the firmness but also in the characteristic flesh colour [65]. This occurs due to the oxidation of proteins and lipids and non-enzymatic reactions [68].
Total colour differences (ΔE) after drying process showed similar browning between slices (S) and cubes (C) compared to the fresh unprocessed form (Table 3). These values are also confirmed by comparing L*, a* and b* values with Chroma. Therefore, temperatures and processing times did not cause significant variations between the two cuts (Figure 2). One possible reason could be that both cuts had similar amounts of initial moisture before drying process. In fact, when comparing the initial weights before drying, the two lots showed very similar values. This is also confirmed by the results of %DR (Table 3), which may have resulted to a similar drying process for both cuts.
L* | a* | b* | C* | ΔE | %DR | |
Slices | 72.38 ± 4.98 | 3.51 ± 2.17 | 38.90 ± 3.66 | 39.10 ± 3.80 | 16.12 ± 4.47 | 15.43 |
Cubes | 73.25 ± 4.98 | 4.20 ± 2.17 | 40.22 ± 3.66 | 40.58 ± 3.80 | 17.91 ± 4.58 | 16.35 |
However, different behaviour was observed during the 30-day storage in MAP (Figure 3). The measured data shows, in both types of cut, a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the browning index (BI) although, after 30 days of storage, the cut most that maintained the lowest BI values was the cubed cut. In S, there was an increase in BI of 10.56 in MAP-P and 7.26 in MAP-N2 from the day after drying to D30. In cube cut, on the other hand, BI increased by 6.91 in MAP-P and 5.21 in MAP-N2. In the presence of nitrogen, BI appeared to show an almost constant trend up to the last day of storage (D30) and, in all cases, maintained values closer to the first day of storage in MAP-P. Although variations in BI were observed in the two MAP treatments during the 30-days period, statistical analysis showed significance only for the slice at D20.
As can be seen from Figure 3, the BI values during storage do not differ much from those after drying. This shows that the pulp did not undergo significant changes in colouration. This phenomenon could be due to enzymatic processes mainly involving phenolic compounds [38]. Furthermore, there seems to be a positive correlation with both the time-temperature combination used and the immersion in antioxidant solutions carried out in the pre-drying phase. In addition, the presence of N2, used to reduce the oxygen level within the package, inhibits the growth of aerobic microorganisms and prevents the oxidation of the nutrients present, thus preserving the quality of the fruit [69].
According to Wu et al. [66], in addition to maintaining firmness, N2 is also responsible for less browning during storage. The results of this study showed that fresh peanut kernels treated with MAP N2 maintained lower browning values than the control group during storage.
The sensory analysis of the dried products was conducted throughout the storage period, as shown in Figure 4. From the analysis of the results, the fruit was most appreciated for peach flavour (PF), sweetness (SW), juiciness (J) and crunchiness (CR). After 10 days of storage, the slices (S) stored in MAP-P were most appreciated, receiving scores of 7 in the positive descriptors of visual appearance (VA) and firmness (FR). In contrast, the cubes (C) stored in MAP-N2 were found to be the sweetest but with a pronounced caramel flavour (CF) and more rubberiness (RU) than the other treatments. After 20 days of storage, fruit from all treatments was highly appreciated for sweetness (SW), rubberiness (RU) and visual appearance (VA). Finally, after 30 days of storage the peach cubes (C), stored in both MAP packaged, scored high for the negative descriptor browning (B), while the S fruit continued to have a very low browning value (B) and scored high for the positive descriptors sweetness (SW) and visual appearance (VA).
In this study, the effect of MAP drying and storage on the physicochemical and sensory quality of Pescabivona var. Settembrina fruit was evaluated, with interesting results. The study concluded that it is possible to apply the drying process to white-fleshed peaches by identifying an appropriate time-temperature combination, which helps to maintain the quality characteristics of the fruit. Samples subjected to MAP maintained an attractive colour after drying and a good firmness and especially MAP-N2 C treatments limited non-enzymatic browning during the storage. Sensory analysis showed that the slicing technique was the best choice, producing fruits with a good visual appearance and firmness, while the cube technique produced sweet fruits with a caramel flavour and more chewy firmness. Moreover, the tray-drying method could help recover Pescabivona var. settembrina fruit waste from the supply chain and create a new value-added- product.
Finally, there are no studies in the literature concerning tray drying of this fruit species. Therefore, this study is preliminary to future investigations concerning drying kinetics in order to more accurately assess the time interval in which a constant moisture value is obtained to preserve the organoleptic quality of the product in question. Furthermore, this approach could bring to light differences, in terms of time, between cubes and slices.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to thank Azienda Agricola Miceli Soletta (Castronovo di Sicilia-PA) for their assistance and the supply of plant material.
Vittorio Farina is an editorial board member for AIMS Agriculture and Food and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
[1] |
Monte M, Sottile F, Barone E, et al. (2005) The Sicilian peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) germplasm: Horticultural characteristics and sanitary status. Acta Hortic 713: 57–60. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.713.3 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.713.3
![]() |
[2] | Farina V, Bianco RL, Inglese P (2006) Shoot growth, crop load, and fruit quality within vase-shaped canopies of Fairtime'peach trees. Eur J Hortic Sci 71: 227. |
[3] |
Allegra A, Sortino G, Farina V, et al. (2013) Effect of passive atmosphere and chemical treatment on fresh cut of white-flesh peach cultivar 'Settembrina Di Bivona'. Acta Hortic 1084: 765–770. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.103 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.103
![]() |
[4] |
Sortino G, Ingrassia M, Allegra A, et al. (2013) Sensory evaluation and suitability for fresh-cut produce of white peach[Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] 'Settembrina di Bivona'. Acta Hortic 1084: 787–790. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.107 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.107
![]() |
[5] |
Allegra A, Barone E, Inglese P, et al. (2015) Variability of sensory profile and quality characteristics for 'Pesca di Bivona'and 'Pesca di Leonforte'peach (Prunus persica Batsch) fresh-cut slices during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 110: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.07.020 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.07.020
![]() |
[6] | Sortino G, Allegra A, Farina V, et al. (2017) Postharvest quality and sensory attributes of 'Pesca di Bivona'peaches (Prunus persica L.) during storage. Bulg J Agric Sci 23: 939–946. |
[7] | Marchese A, Tobutt K, Campisi G, et al. (2006) Peach germplasm in Sicily: variation in phenology, morphology and molecular traits[Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Italus Hortus (Italy) 13: 118–122. |
[8] |
Todaro A, Farina V, Inglese P, et al. (2013) Changes in ascorbic acid content in fresh cut Sicilian yellow-flesh peaches. VⅢ Int Peach Symp 1084: 777–780. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.105 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.105
![]() |
[9] |
Sortino G, Saletta F, Puccio S, et al. (2020) Extending the shelf life of white peach fruit with 1-methylcyclopropene and aloe arborescens edible coating. Agriculture 10: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10050151 doi: 10.3390/agriculture10050151
![]() |
[10] |
Kou X, Feng Y, Yuan S, et al. (2021) Different regulatory mechanisms of plant hormones in the ripening of climacteric and non-climacteric fruits: A review. Plant Mol Biol 107: 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01199-9 doi: 10.1007/s11103-021-01199-9
![]() |
[11] |
Raffo A, Nardo N, Tabilio M, et al. (2008) Effects of cold storage on aroma compounds of white-and yellow-fleshed peaches. Eur Food Res Technol 226: 1503–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0682-0 doi: 10.1007/s00217-007-0682-0
![]() |
[12] | Sortino G, Farina V, Liguori G, et al. (2013) Prediction of harvest time in peach[Prunus persica (L.) batsch] fruit using the da-meter. Acta Hortic 1084: 771–776. |
[13] |
Kluge RA, Jacomino AP (2002) Shelf life of peaches treated with 1-methylcyclopropene. Sci Agric 59: 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162002000100010 doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162002000100010
![]() |
[14] |
Ezzat A, Ammar A, Szabó Z, et al. (2017) Postharvest treatments with methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid for maintaining physico-chemical characteristics and sensory quality properties of apricot fruit during cold storage and shelf-life. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 67: 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjfns-2016-0013 doi: 10.1515/pjfns-2016-0013
![]() |
[15] |
Fang Y, Wakisaka M (2021) A review on the modified atmosphere preservation of fruits and vegetables with cutting-edge technologies. Agriculture 11: 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100992 doi: 10.3390/agriculture11100992
![]() |
[16] | Elik A, Yanik DK, Istanbullu Y, et al. (2019) Strategies to reduce post-harvest losses for fruits and vegetables. Strategies 5: 29–39. |
[17] | Coates L, Johnson G (1997) Postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. Plant Pathog Plant Dis 1997: 533–548. |
[18] |
Aghdam MS, Bodbodak S (2014) Postharvest heat treatment for mitigation of chilling injury in fruits and vegetables. Food Bioprocess Technol 7: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1207-4 doi: 10.1007/s11947-013-1207-4
![]() |
[19] |
Medici M, Canavari M, Toselli M (2020) Interpreting environmental impacts resulting from fruit cultivation in a business innovation perspective. Sustainability 12: 9793. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239793 doi: 10.3390/su12239793
![]() |
[20] | Shewfelt RL (2014) Measuring quality and maturity. In: Florkowski WJ, Shewfelt RL, Brueckner B, et al. (Eds.), Postharvest Handling—A Systems Approach, 3rd Edition, Elsevier, 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408137-6.00014-4 |
[21] |
Anand S, Barua M (2022) Modeling the key factors leading to post-harvest loss and waste of fruits and vegetables in the agri-fresh produce supply chain. Comput Electron Agric 198: 106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106936 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106936
![]() |
[22] | FAO (2019) Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019, Rome, Italy. |
[23] | FAO (2020) Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. The State of Food and Agriculture 2020, Rome, Italy. |
[24] |
Tinebra I, Passafiume R, Scuderi D, et al. (2022) Effects of tray-drying on the physicochemical, microbiological, proximate, and sensory properties of white-and red-fleshed loquat (Eriobotrya Japonica Lindl.) fruit. Agronomy 12: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020540 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020540
![]() |
[25] |
Sadler MJ, Gibson S, Whelan K, et al. (2019) Dried fruit and public health–what does the evidence tell us? Int J Food Sci Nutr 70: 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2019.1568398 doi: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1568398
![]() |
[26] |
Sun Y, Liang C (2021) Effects of determinants of dried fruit purchase intention and the related consumer segmentation on e-commerce in China. Br Food J 123: 1133–1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0617 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0617
![]() |
[27] |
Megías-Pérez R, Gamboa-Santos J, Soria AC, et al. (2014) Survey of quality indicators in commercial dehydrated fruits. Food Chem 150: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.141 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.141
![]() |
[28] |
Jin TZ, Huang M, Niemira BA, et al. (2016) Shelf-life extension of fresh ginseng roots using sanitiser washing, edible antimicrobial coating and modified atmosphere packaging. Int J Food Sci Technol 51: 2132–2139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13201 doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13201
![]() |
[29] |
Lewicki PP (2006) Design of hot air drying for better foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 17: 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.012
![]() |
[30] |
Krokida M, Philippopoulos C (2005) Rehydration of dehydrated foods. Dry Technol 23: 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-200054201 doi: 10.1081/DRT-200054201
![]() |
[31] |
Fratianni A, Adiletta G, Di Matteo M, et al. (2020) Evolution of carotenoid content, antioxidant activity and volatiles compounds in dried mango fruits (Mangifera Indica L.). Foods 9: 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101424 doi: 10.3390/foods9101424
![]() |
[32] | Amri E, Lenoi S (2016) Aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination of sun-dried sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) chips in Kahama district, Tanzania. J Appl Environ Microbiol 4: 55–62. |
[33] | Russo P, Adiletta G, Di Matteo M, et al. (2019) Drying kinetics and physico-chemical quality of mango slices. Chem Eng 75: 109–114. |
[34] |
Wu J, Zhang L, Fan K (2022) Recent advances in ultrasound-coupled drying for improving the quality of fruits and vegetables: a review. Int J Food Sci Technol 57: 5722–5731. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15935 doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15935
![]() |
[35] |
Maskan M (2001) Kinetics of colour change of kiwifruits during hot air and microwave drying. J Food Eng 48: 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00154-0 doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00154-0
![]() |
[36] |
Tinebra I, Scuderi D, Sortino G, et al. (2021) Effects of Argon-Based and Nitrogen-Based Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology on the Quality of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Wonderful) Arils. Foods 10: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020370 doi: 10.3390/foods10020370
![]() |
[37] |
Tinebra I, Scuderi D, Busetta G, et al. (2022) Modified Atmosphere Packaging and low temperature storage extend marketability of cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.). Italus Hortus 29: 115–137. https://doi.org/10.26353/j.itahort/2022.1.115137 doi: 10.26353/j.itahort/2022.1.115137
![]() |
[38] | Farina V, Sortino G, Saletta F, et al. (2017) Effects of rapid refrigeration and modified atmosphere packaging on litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit quality traits. Chem Eng Trans 58: 415–420. |
[39] |
Arvanitoyannis IS, Stratakos AC (2012) Application of modified atmosphere packaging and active/smart technologies to red meat and poultry: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 5: 1423–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0803-z doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0803-z
![]() |
[40] |
Caleb OJ, Mahajan PV, Al-Said FA-J, et al. (2013) Modified atmosphere packaging technology of fresh and fresh-cut produce and the microbial consequences—a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 6: 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4 doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4
![]() |
[41] |
Passafiume R, Roppolo P, Tinebra I, et al. (2023) Reduction of pericarp browning and microbial spoilage on litchi fruits in modified atmosphere packaging. Horticulturae 9: 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060651 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9060651
![]() |
[42] | Specification Term on the Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs. 18 Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 41 (2016). Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle = hein.journals/dokuz18 & div = 11 & id = & page = . |
[43] |
Cisneros-Zevallos L, Krochta J m. (2003) Dependence of coating thickness on viscosity of coating solution applied to fruits and vegetables by dipping method. J Food Sci 68: 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05702.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05702.x
![]() |
[44] |
Dıaz GR, Martınez-Monzo J, Fito P, et al. (2003) Modelling of dehydration-rehydration of orange slices in combined microwave/air drying. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 4: 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-8564(03)00016-X doi: 10.1016/S1466-8564(03)00016-X
![]() |
[45] |
Kesbi OM, Sadeghi M, Mireei SA (2016) Quality assessment and modeling of microwave-convective drying of lemon slices. Eng Agric Environ Food 9: 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2015.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.eaef.2015.12.003
![]() |
[46] |
Fu X, Xing S, Xiong H, et al. (2018) Effects of packaging materials on storage quality of peanut kernels. PLOS ONE 13: e0190377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190377 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190377
![]() |
[47] |
López Camelo AF, Gómez PA (2004) Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Hortic Bras 22: 534–537. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362004000300006 doi: 10.1590/S0102-05362004000300006
![]() |
[48] | Ruangchakpet A, Sajjaanantakul T (2007) Effect of browning on total phenolic, flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in Indian gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica Linn.). Agric Nat Resour 41: 331–337. |
[49] |
Polenta G, Budde C, Murray R (2005) Effects of different pre-storage anoxic treatments on ethanol and acetaldehyde content in peaches. Postharvest Biol Technol 38: 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.07.003
![]() |
[50] | Gazzetta ufficiale della repubblica italiana (2012) metodo per la determinazione del residuo secco o sostanza secca nei succhi di frutta ed ortaggi e prodotti affini. |
[51] |
Passafiume R, Tinebra I, Gaglio R, et al. (2022) Fresh-cut mangoes: How to increase shelf life by using neem oil edible coating. Coatings 12: 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050664 doi: 10.3390/coatings12050664
![]() |
[52] |
Mazzaglia A, Lanza C, Farina V, et al. (2010) Evaluation of fruit quality in loquat using both chemical and sensory analyses. Acta Hortic 887: 345–349. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.887.59 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.887.59
![]() |
[53] |
Testa R, Migliore G, Schifani G, et al. (2020) Chemical-physical, sensory analyses and consumers' quality perception of local vs. imported loquat fruits: A sustainable development perspective. Agronomy 10: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060870 doi: 10.3390/agronomy10060870
![]() |
[54] |
Montevecchi G, Simone GV, Masino F, et al. (2012) Physical and chemical characterization of Pescabivona, a Sicilian white flesh peach cultivar[Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Food Res Int 45: 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.019 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.019
![]() |
[55] |
Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM (2002) Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of 'Redglobe'table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol 24: 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00189-2 doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00189-2
![]() |
[56] |
Mahiuddin M, Khan MIH, Kumar C, et al. (2018) Shrinkage of food materials during drying: Current status and challenges. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 17: 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12375 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12375
![]() |
[57] |
Witrowa-Rajchert D, Rząca M (2009) Effect of drying method on the microstructure and physical properties of dried apples. Dry Technol 27: 903–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930903017376 doi: 10.1080/07373930903017376
![]() |
[58] |
Qing-Guo H, Min Z, Mujumdar AS, et al. (2006) Effects of different drying methods on the quality changes of granular edamame. Acta Hortic 24: 1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930600776217 doi: 10.1080/07373930600776217
![]() |
[59] | Shewfelt RL (2000) Fruit and vegetable quality. In: Shewfelt RL, Bruckner B (Eds.), Fruit and Vegetable Quality, CRC Press, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482293937-17 |
[60] |
Manrique GD, Lajolo FM (2004) Cell-wall polysaccharide modifications during postharvest ripening of papaya fruit (Carica papaya). Postharvest Biol Technol 33: 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.01.007
![]() |
[61] |
Mafra I, Lanza B, Reis A, et al. (2001) Effect of ripening on texture, microstructure and cell wall polysaccharide composition of olive fruit (Olea europaea). Physiol Plant 111: 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110403.x doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110403.x
![]() |
[62] |
Askari G, Emam-Djomeh Z, Mousavi S (2009) An investigation of the effects of drying methods and conditions on drying characteristics and quality attributes of agricultural products during hot air and hot air/microwave-assisted dehydration. Dry Technol 27: 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930902988106 doi: 10.1080/07373930902988106
![]() |
[63] |
Šumić Z, Vakula A, Tepić A, et al. (2016) Modeling and optimization of red currants vacuum drying process by response surface methodology (RSM). Food Chem 203: 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.109 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.109
![]() |
[64] |
Ranjbar S, Rahemi M, Ramezanian A (2018) Comparison of nano-calcium and calcium chloride spray on postharvest quality and cell wall enzymes activity in apple cv. Red Delicious. Sci Hortic 240: 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.035 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.035
![]() |
[65] |
Wong R, Kim S, Chung S-J, et al. (2020) Texture preferences of Chinese, Korean and US consumers: A case study with apple and pear dried fruits. Foods 9: 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030377 doi: 10.3390/foods9030377
![]() |
[66] |
Wu Q, Li C, Zhang D, et al. (2022) Nitrogen modified atmosphere packaging maintains the bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of postharvest fresh edible peanuts. Postharvest Biol Technol 190: 111957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111957 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111957
![]() |
[67] |
Fan K, Wu J, Chen L (2021) Ultrasound and its combined application in the improvement of microbial and physicochemical quality of fruits and vegetables: A review. Ultrason Sonochem 80: 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105838 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105838
![]() |
[68] |
Hidalgo FJ, Zamora R (2000) The role of lipids in nonenzymatic browning. Grasas Aceites 51: 35–49. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2000.v51.i1-2.405 doi: 10.3989/gya.2000.v51.i1-2.405
![]() |
[69] |
Sivertsvik M, Rosnes J, Bergslien H (2002) Modified atmosphere packaging. Minimal Processing Technologies in The Food Industry. Woodhead Publ 4: 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781855736795.61 doi: 10.1533/9781855736795.61
![]() |
1. | Ilenia Tinebra, Roberta Passafiume, Alessandra Culmone, Eristanna Palazzolo, Giuliana Garofalo, Vincenzo Naselli, Antonio Alfonzo, Raimondo Gaglio, Vittorio Farina, Boosting post-harvest quality of 'Coscia' pears: Antioxidant-enriched coating and MAP storage, 2024, 9, 2471-2086, 1151, 10.3934/agrfood.2024060 | |
2. | Pasquale Roppolo, Alessandra Culmone, Roberta Passafiume, Antonino Pirrone, Ilenia Tinebra, Ignazio Gugino, Morgana Monte, Vincenzo Naselli, Nicola Francesca, Raimondo Gaglio, Claudio De Pasquale, Aldo Todaro, Vittorio Farina, Effect of Hot Air-Drying Technique on the Quality and Stability of Blood Orange Slices in Modified Atmosphere Packaging, 2025, 11, 2311-7524, 116, 10.3390/horticulturae11020116 |
TSSC (°Brix) |
TA (g malic a./L) |
FF (N) |
C* (Chroma) |
TSSC/TA | |
Pescabivona var. Settembrina | 12.93 ± 0.40 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 27.60 ± 0.53 | 71.83 |
(a) | Slice (S) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 57.57 ± 1.71 | 25.20 ± 1.81 |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ns | 19.28 ± 3.23ab |
D10 MAP-P | 48.46 ± 4.61 | 20.92 ± 1.40a |
D20 MAP-P | 49.60 ± 6.02 | 19.75 ± 2.43a |
D30 MAP-P | 46.00 ± 2.49* | 17.30 ± 2.94b |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ab | 19.28 ± 3.23a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 50.87 ± 5.89a | 19.75 ± 2.01a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 45.45 ± 7.49bc | 18.60 ± 2.35a |
D30 MAP-N2 | 41.80 ± 4.84c, * | 16.15 ± 3.86b |
(b) | Cubes (C) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 36.07 ± 1.36 | 24.56 ± 1.13 |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43ab |
D10 MAP-P | 25.33 ± 4.06ab | 19.95 ± 3.74a |
D20 MAP-P | 23.60 ± 2.60b | 16.90 ± 1.97bc |
D30 MAP-P | 22.65 ± 6.29bc | 15.45 ± 3.09c |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 24.81 ± 4.81ab | 19.59 ± 3.29a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 21.75 ± 4.95b | 15.20 ± 2.38b |
D30 MAP-N2 | 23.40 ± 4.62bc | 15.15 ± 1.73b |
L* | a* | b* | C* | ΔE | %DR | |
Slices | 72.38 ± 4.98 | 3.51 ± 2.17 | 38.90 ± 3.66 | 39.10 ± 3.80 | 16.12 ± 4.47 | 15.43 |
Cubes | 73.25 ± 4.98 | 4.20 ± 2.17 | 40.22 ± 3.66 | 40.58 ± 3.80 | 17.91 ± 4.58 | 16.35 |
TSSC (°Brix) |
TA (g malic a./L) |
FF (N) |
C* (Chroma) |
TSSC/TA | |
Pescabivona var. Settembrina | 12.93 ± 0.40 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 27.60 ± 0.53 | 71.83 |
(a) | Slice (S) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 57.57 ± 1.71 | 25.20 ± 1.81 |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ns | 19.28 ± 3.23ab |
D10 MAP-P | 48.46 ± 4.61 | 20.92 ± 1.40a |
D20 MAP-P | 49.60 ± 6.02 | 19.75 ± 2.43a |
D30 MAP-P | 46.00 ± 2.49* | 17.30 ± 2.94b |
Post drying | 49.80 ± 5.47ab | 19.28 ± 3.23a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 50.87 ± 5.89a | 19.75 ± 2.01a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 45.45 ± 7.49bc | 18.60 ± 2.35a |
D30 MAP-N2 | 41.80 ± 4.84c, * | 16.15 ± 3.86b |
(b) | Cubes (C) | |
LD | TD | |
Fresh | 36.07 ± 1.36 | 24.56 ± 1.13 |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43ab |
D10 MAP-P | 25.33 ± 4.06ab | 19.95 ± 3.74a |
D20 MAP-P | 23.60 ± 2.60b | 16.90 ± 1.97bc |
D30 MAP-P | 22.65 ± 6.29bc | 15.45 ± 3.09c |
Post drying | 27.31 ± 1.83a | 18.53 ± 1.43a |
D10 MAP-N2 | 24.81 ± 4.81ab | 19.59 ± 3.29a |
D20 MAP-N2 | 21.75 ± 4.95b | 15.20 ± 2.38b |
D30 MAP-N2 | 23.40 ± 4.62bc | 15.15 ± 1.73b |
L* | a* | b* | C* | ΔE | %DR | |
Slices | 72.38 ± 4.98 | 3.51 ± 2.17 | 38.90 ± 3.66 | 39.10 ± 3.80 | 16.12 ± 4.47 | 15.43 |
Cubes | 73.25 ± 4.98 | 4.20 ± 2.17 | 40.22 ± 3.66 | 40.58 ± 3.80 | 17.91 ± 4.58 | 16.35 |