Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of <i>Annona cherimola</i> Mill. grown in southern Italy

Gullo Gregorio; Dattola Antonio; Zappia Rocco; Gullo Gregorio; Dattola Antonio; Zappia Rocco

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.658

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2019, Volume 4, Issue 3: 658-671. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.658

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy

Dept. AG.R.A.R.I.A., Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy, UE.

Received: 08 March 2019 Accepted: 25 June 2019 Published: 07 August 2019

This work aimed to analyse the differences between fruits obtained by different harvest dates in two cultivars Annona cherimola (Fino de Jete and Campas) planted in Southern Italy. The fruits selected at the fruit-set time were harvested when 1500 Degree Day were accumulated. Fruits were sampled from October to December when 1500 Growing Degree Days (DD) were accumulated from fruit-set. Fruit fresh weight and skin colour were measured at harvest and after storage. The following parameters were also measured: Fruit shape, pulp colour, pulp firmness, number of seeds, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, total polyphenol content, total antioxidant capacity and fruit dry weight. An MFA was carried out. In the first phase of the MFA, a PCA was performed for each group of quantitative variables (PPCA). Then, the variables were divided into five groups: Carpological (CR), colourimetric (CL), maturation index (MI), nutraceutical (NU), and Environmental (Env). All relations between the variables and the formation of the factors were affected. The multifactorial factor analysis has allowed evaluating the role that the different groups of variables, taken into consideration, have in defining the time harvest. In order to have fruits of regular shape and size, the harvest must be carried out within the last ten days of October, involving the pollinated flower within the third week of June. About the size and regularity of the fruit, from the third week of June, it appears to be borderline, as the fruits are smaller in size, with fewer seeds, but still, guarantee size and shape that falls within the quality standards of the Annona cherimola. Between the two cultivars, Fino de Jete cultivar is more sensitive to temperature increases during the pollination period than the Campas cultivar.

Keywords:

Citation: Gullo Gregorio, Dattola Antonio, Zappia Rocco. Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 658-671. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.658

Related Papers:

[1]	Hamdi Abdulwahab Alhakimi, Omima Gadalla Mohamed, Hayat Salah Eldin Khogaly, Khalid Ahmad Omar Arafa, Waled Amen Ahmed . Epidemiological, Clinical and Entomological Characteristics of Yellow Fever Outbreak in Darfur 2012. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(1): 132-141. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.1.132
[2]	Testimony J Olumade, Oluwafolajimi A Adesanya, Iyanuoluwa J Fred-Akintunwa, David O Babalola, Judith U Oguzie, Olusola A Ogunsanya, Uwem E George, Oluwawapelumi D Akin-Ajani, Damilola G Osasona . Infectious disease outbreak preparedness and response in Nigeria: history, limitations and recommendations for global health policy and practice. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(4): 736-757. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020057
[3]	Le Thi Diem Phuong, Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh, Vu Sinh Nam . Climate Variability and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Ba Tri District, Ben Tre Province, Vietnam during 2004–2014. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(4): 769-780. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.769
[4]	Srikanth Umakanthan, Anuradha Chauhan, Madan Mohan Gupta, Pradeep Kumar Sahu, Maryann M Bukelo, Vijay Kumar Chattu . COVID-19 pandemic containment in the Caribbean Region: A review of case-management and public health strategies. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(4): 665-681. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021053
[5]	Mohammed A. Soghaier, Khwaja M.I. Saeed, Khushhal K. Zaman . Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) has Declared Twice in 2014; Polio and Ebola at the Top. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(2): 218-222. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.2.218
[6]	Viorica Munteanu, Antonella Petaccia, Nicolae Contecaru, Emanuele Amodio, Carlo Virginio Agostoni . Paediatric acute rheumatic fever in developed countries: Neglected or negligible disease? Results from an observational study in Lombardy (Italy). AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(2): 135-143. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.2.135
[7]	Sumbal Javed, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Hamid Allahverdipour . Predators among protectors: overcoming power abuse during humanitarian crisis through effective humanitarian diplomacy and a gender-transformative approach. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 196-205. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021015
[8]	Terri Rebmann, Kristin D. Wilson, Travis Loux, Ayesha Z. Iqbal, Eleanor B. Peters, Olivia Peavler . Outcomes, Approaches, and Challenges to Developing and Passing a Countywide Mandatory Vaccination Policy: St. Louis County’s Experience with Hepatitis A Vaccine for Food Service Personnel. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 116-130. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.116
[9]	Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Wajahat Anjum, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Muhammad Shoaib . Recurrent neural network for the dynamics of Zika virus spreading. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 432-458. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024022
[10]	Farhana Sultana, Hasan Mahmud Reza . Are SAARC countries prepared to combat COVID-19 to save young, working-age population?. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 440-449. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020036

Abstract

1. Introduction

Phosphorus is an essential/key nutrient required by planted crops for growth and other vital metabolic processes. It is next to nitrogen in terms of significance for plant sustenance ^[1]. However, despite the phosphorus second position status with being a growth-limiting nutrient, it is not atmospherically present and cannot be fixed biologically, unlike nitrogen ^[2]. The soluble phosphate fertilizer application in soil encourages maximum/optimum growth of plants and importantly improves soil health. Supplying the required number of phosphorus to crops enhances the growth/development of roots and can lead to early plant maturity. Also, it is significant in the formation of seeds, vital in all plant metabolic processes, plant growth enhancement, and the ability of plants to resist phytopathogens ^[3]. Microbial phosphate-solubilizers can biotransform phosphatic compounds insoluble to soluble forms for plant assimilation in soil ^[4,5]. The mineralization of organic phosphate contributes immensely to the phosphorus-cycling function in agriculture. Organic phosphate has contributed a greater percentage of total soil phosphate; however, many microorganisms that are found in the rhizosphere and the surrounding soil have phosphate-solubilizing ability influence by microbial phosphatases ^[6].

Maize (Zea mays L) is globally important and it is an intensely grown cereal plant all over the globe. It is a commercially cultivated crop worldwide. Maize (Zea mays L.) is a highly prized food crop worldwide ^[7,8]. It is consumed throughout the globe as a staple food. It is economically important in industrial sectors; pharmaceutical, food, livestock feed, paper, and even in the energy industry ^[9]. Thus, based on its economic value, the demand for maize is always high. It is used as a nutritious food source and important in industry for producing various values-added products ^[10].

The search for sustainable options for reducing agrochemical intensification of crop productivity is an important research theme in today’s global crop production processes. Justifiable drawbacks of agrochemical applications in the crop production value chain are they are nonrenewable resources and not eco-friendly, groundwater is polluted, cost of energy is high, biodiversity is impacted negatively, as well as the issue of eutrophication ^[11]. Thus, the use of green technology like the deployment of microbial resources as bioinoculating agents that are safer and ecologically sustainable are viable alternatives to synthetic chemical applications in agricultural productivity ^[12].

This research represents an attempt to isolate atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains and assess their plant growth enhancement capability when used as biofertilizer for the growth of maize. UV- irradiation mutation of the atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains was performed for the enhancement of their phosphate-solubilizing ability. Biofertilizers increase the availability of nutrients required to plants by fixing nitrogen through solubilization of phosphates by producing metabolites that enhances the growth of plants. Biofertilizers are viable alternatives in decreasing the usage of synthetic fertilizers and other agrochemicals. Biofertilizers play an important role in soil health and improve plant fitness through microbial mediated metabolite production. Biofertilizers are harmless, natural biological resources that function efficiently. Therefore, phosphate solubilizing microorganisms as biofertilizers provide ecologically friendly agricultural input that is cheaper and economical than the commonly used synthetic fertilizers ^[13]. The usage of phosphate biofertilizers is an encouraging approach to enhance world food security through the improvement of agricultural yield in developing countries in Africa and Asia ^[14].

This investigation determined the beneficial effects of non-toxigenic A. flavus strains that are phosphate solubilizers as biofertilizer to enhance growth parameters and mineral elements content of maize plants.

2. Materials and method

2.1. Experimental location

This investigation was done in Nigeria, at the Research Institute for Stored Product (NSPRI), Ilorin. Ilorin is a town in Kwara state of Nigeria located in the North central geopolitical zone with characteristics of the guinea savanna zone vegetation (Longitude N 8.3° and Latitude E 4.33°). This research experiment was conducted in the year 2017–2019.

Sample collection and experimental conditions

Samples were collected from the rhizosphere soil of planted maize crop. Soil was scrapped carefully to about 6–7 cm depth; soil sample was collected into an aluminum foil paper, using an auger and was transported to laboratory for further analysis. The soil sample was processed immediately for the isolation of phosphate solubilizing fungi ^[15]. The phosphate solubilizing fungi strains were the wild-type originally isolated from the rhizospheric soil of maize plant, while the maize was obtained from Germplasm collection of NSPRI. The potting experimental study was conducted in a greenhouse.

The cycle of light/dark received by the plant during pot experimental growth stage was 12 hours light and 12 hours dark cycle.

2.2. Isolating fungi phosphate solubilizers

Phosphate solubilizing fungi (PSF) were isolated from the above-named soil sample by serial dilution using Pikovskaya medium agar containing tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) ^[16]. Appropriate soil dilutions were plated on Pikovskaya agar medium by spread plate method before incubation at 28 ± 2 ℃ for 7 days. The fungal isolates that formed halo zone clearance of insoluble calcium phosphate, while growing on (Pikovskaya agar) plate were selected as potential phosphate solubilizers ^[17].

2.3. Determination of Aflatoxin-production potential of Aspergillus flavus using cultural screening method

Coconut agar i.e desiccated neutral red incorporated coconut agar (NRDCA) was used to screen for the ability of Aspergillus flavus to produce aflatoxins in order to determine and certify its safety as biofertilizer. In brief, neutral red desiccated coconut agar (NRDCA) is a formulated medium that is used for the detection of aflatoxigenic fungi and direct visual determination of aflatoxins.

200 grams of desiccated coconut is soaked in 1litre of hot distilled water and blended to obtain the filtrate. To the filtrate, 2% agar powder is added and homogenized by gentle heating. To the homogenized medium is added 0.3% neutral red stain before sterilization by autoclaving. The fungal isolate was inoculated on petri-plate using coconut agar to detect aflatoxin production following ^[18]. protocol. Aflatoxigenic positive isolate was expected to indicate yellow color following incubation on agar plate and fluorescence at (365 nm) UV irradiation.

2.4. Strain improvement

The mutants of the selected non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus isolates were developed with the use of UV irradiation at 254 nm wavelength. The isolates were grown in Pikovskaya broth for 7 days and the mycelium was macerated with the help of a tissue homogenizer. 5ml of the mycelia suspension (35–40 CFU/ml) was transferred to Pikovskaya agar plates and exposed to UV “irradiation for 90, 60, 30, and 15 minutes respectively”. Aspergillus flavus isolates that were irradiated with UV light for 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes were designated as AF15, AF30, AF60, AF90 mutants.

100 µl of irradiated mycelia suspension was inoculated on PDA plate and incubation of plates done at 28 ± 2 ℃ for 72 h along with the control (non-mutated A. flavus isolate). The survived colonies were obtained after 72 h of incubation ^[19].

Thereafter, fungi isolate phosphate solubilization capability was determined both quantitatively and qualitatively ^[20].

2.5. Phosphate solubilization assay

Qualitative assay for phosphate solubilizing activity

Pure culture of wild AF (original isolates) and its mutants were spot inoculated (1.0 × 10⁶ spores/ml of isolates) at the center of already prepared agar plates of Pikovskaya agar medium. The incubation of plates was done at room temperature for 7 days. Fungi isolates that solubilizes insoluble phosphates contained in (PKA agar medium plate), forming greater than 5.0 cm zone of solubilization were preferentially selected as phosphate solubilizers, and maintained as stock isolates on PDA for subsequent studies. The zone of phosphate solubilization (cm) formed around colonies was recorded after every 24 hours for 7 days. The solubilizing efficiency of the fungi was calculated using the formula.

$\boldsymbol{S}\boldsymbol{o}\boldsymbol{l}\boldsymbol{u}\boldsymbol{b}\boldsymbol{i}\boldsymbol{l}\boldsymbol{i}\boldsymbol{z}\boldsymbol{a}\boldsymbol{t}\boldsymbol{i}\boldsymbol{o}\boldsymbol{n}\ \boldsymbol{i}\boldsymbol{n}\boldsymbol{d}\boldsymbol{e}\boldsymbol{x} = \frac{\left(\bf{Z}+\bf{C}\right)}{\boldsymbol{C}}$

$Z = solubilization\ zone\left(cm\right)$

$C = colony\ diameter\left(cm\right)\text{.}$

Pikovskaya medium with known amount of phosphorus containing 0.005 g/L bromophenol blue (BPB) was prepared ^[21]. The isolates that were positive on tri-calcium phosphate solubilization (Pikovskaya agar) medium were tested further for phosphate solubilization in broth culture medium.

The incubation of isolates in Pikovskaya broth medium was at 28 ± 2 ℃ for 3–4 days followed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 15 mins. The fungal cultures were filtered after centrifugation using Whatman filter paper. 1 ml from the filtrate was mixed with 10 ml of ammonium molybdate and the content was diluted to 45 ml. Chlorostanus acid (0.25 ml) was added to each treatments and final volume were made up to 50 ml using distilled water. Appearance of blue color intensity of the solutions was measured using a colorimeter at 600 nm. The amount of phosphorus solubilized was calculated and obtained with the help of a standard curve ^[22].

2.6. Pot trial experiment

A greenhouse pot trial experiment was carried out with 6 treatments and 3 replications. All the experimental pots were treated with their respective isolates. The maize seeds were collected from the Horticultural Research Institutes (NIHORT), Ibadan. The seeds were sown in the plastic pots (4 seeds/pot) filled with 10 kg of sterilized loamy soil. All the fungal isolates were grown in Pikovskaya broth in 20 ml each at the corresponding temperature. Seeds of maize were surface sterilized and spore suspensions (4 ml) of 1 × 10⁶ spores/ml of all isolates were inoculated into soils 48 h prior to sowing. Un-inoculated pot was the control ^[23]. The observed data on seedling height (cm), percentage seed germination (%), height of plant (cm), leaves number, dry matter (g), cob length (cm), cob weight (g), 100 grain weight (g), grain yield (g/pot). The experimental set-up was replicated thrice and is as described below:

(Influence of Aspergillus flavus (AF) strains as bioinoculants on growth parameters and mineral nutritional content of maize plant.)

Treatment 1 – Maize seeds + AF90;

Treatment 2 – Maize seeds + AF60;

Treatment 3 – Maize seeds + AF30;

Treatment 4 – Maize seeds + AF15;

Treatment 5 – Maize seeds + wild AF;

Treatment 6 – Maize seeds only (control).

2.7. Statistical data analysis

Data on all parameters studied was statistically inferred using one-way (ANOVA). Data was analyzed using PROC GLM SAS software. Data were recorded in triplicates and analyzed, while means were separated using Duncan multiple range test (DMRT) and probability significance level was 95%.

3. Results

3.1. Phosphate solubilizing activity of Aspergillus flavus

The phosphate solubilization results obtained in this investigation indicated differences (p < 0.05) for all the A. flavus strains used. Among all the fungi strains that was assessed for phosphate solubilization potential on Pikovskaya agar medium qualitatively, the mutant Aspergillus flavus (AF90) strain showed maximum level of phosphate solubilization activity (This is reflected in Figure 1).

Figure 1. Qualitative representation of phosphate solubilization index of non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains. Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF 15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV15 min); AF 30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 30 min); AF 60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 60 min); AF 90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Also, the quantitative phosphate solubilizing analysis indicated that Aspergillus flavus mutant (AF90) showed maximum level of phosphate solubilization (7.3 ppm) efficiency/activity and the wild type of the Aspergillus flavus (Wild AF) recorded the least/lowest solubilization efficiency of (3.2 ppm) after 7 days of incubation (Table 1).

Table 1. Comparison of phosphate solubilization efficiency in (ppm) among the different non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains.

Strains	Quantity of phosphate solubilized after 3 days T3 (ppm)	Quantity of phosphate solubilized after 5 days QT5 (ppm)	Quantity of phosphate solubilized after 7 days QT7 (ppm)
AF15	2.43 ± 0.01^d	3.15 ± 0.01^d	4.32 ± 0.01^d
AF30	3.02 ± 0.01^c	4.22 ± 0.01^c	5.64 ± 0.01^c
AF60	4.07 ± 0.01^b	5.92 ± 0.01^b	6.36 ± 0.01^b
AF90	5.01 ± 0.01^a	6.63 ± 0.01^a	7.34 ± 0.01^a
Wild AF	1.26 ± 0.01^e	2.68 ± 0.01^e	3.21 ± 0.01^e
Control	0.52 ± 0.02^f	0.72 ± 0.01^f	1.27 ± 0.15^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 15 min); AF30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

3.2. Pot trial experiment

Also, results obtained in the pot trial experiment to investigate the effectiveness of Aspergillus flavus and its mutants to enhance the growth parameters and elemental nutritional composition of the maize plant, indicated that there was significant increases in agronomic parameters for shoot length (cm), percentage seed germination (%), plant height (cm), plant leaves number, cob length (cm), cob weight (g), 100 grain weight (g), grain yield (g/pot) when treatments with the fungi strain inoculants were compared to the control. These results are shown in Tables 2–6.

Table 2. Influence of phosphate solubilizing, non-toxigenic A. flavus strains on growth parameters of maize plants.

Fungal strains	GERMINATION %	SHOOT LENGTH (30 DAP) (cm)	PLANT HEIGHT (30 DAP) (cm)	PLANTHEIGHT (60DAP) (cm)	PLANT HEIGHT (90 DAP) (cm)	NUMBER OF LEAVES (30 DAP)	NUMBER OF LEAVES (60 DAP)	NUMBER OF LEAVES (90 DAP)
AF15	63.33 ± 3.05^d	9.16 ± 0.21^d	58.20 ± 0.10^d	76.20 ± 0.20^d	81.20 ± 0.20^d	8.17 ± 0.02^d	10.69 ± 0.06^d	11.17 ± 0.14^d
AF30	82.67 ± 3.05^c	11.50 ± 0.26^c	65.33 ± 0.31^c	83.46 ± 0.25^c	92.30 ± 0.31^c	8.23 ± 0.01^c	19.03 ± 0.03^c	12.10 ± 0.09^c
AF60	84.33 ± 4.04^b	12.43 ± 0.21^b	73.33 ± 0.20^b	94.36 ± 0.32^b	201.43 ± 0.21^b	9.02 ± 0.01^b	10.43 ± 0.20^b	14.14 ± 0.12^b
AF90	99.10 ± 1.0^a	14.30 ± 0.10^a	88.73 ± 0.64^a	127.40 ± 0.20^a	228.20 ± 0.2^a	9.22 ± 0.01^a	14.20 ± 0.15^a	16.84 ± 0.03^a
Wild AF	60.66 ± 1.15^e	7.60 ± 0.26^e	53.10 ± 0.1^e	65.46 ± 0.32^e	78.56 ± 0.49^e	7.34 ± 0.02^e	9.18 ± 0.07^e	11.02 ± 0.03^e
Control	43.33 ± 3.05^f	5.50 ± 0.26^f	45.23 ± 0.15^f	63.20 ± 0.20^f	73.40 ± 0.20^f	7.22 ± 0.02^f	8.14 ± 0.12^f	9.15 ± 0.11^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 15 min); AF30: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). %GERM: Percentage germination; SDLHT: Seedling heights; PLHT30: Plant height at 30 d of planting; PLHT60: Plant height at 60 d of planting; PLHT90: Plant height at 90 d of planting; NOLP30: Leaves number at 30 d of planting; NOLP60: Leaves number at 60 d of planting; NOLP90: Leaves number at 90 d of planting. The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 3. Influence of non-toxigenic A. flavus strains on growth parameters in maize plant.

Strains	Cob length (cm)	100 grain weight (g)	Grain yield (g/pot)
AF15	12.36 ± 0.15^d	151.60 ± 1.44^d	56.13 ± 0.70^d
AF30	13.30 ± 0.26^c	162.80 ± 0.72^c	59.13 ± 0.30^c
AF60	14.50 ± 0.15^b	172.06 ± 0.50^b	63.06 ± 0.31^b
AF90	15.30 ± 0.20^a	188.90 ± 0.65^a	76.06 ± 0.30^a
Wild AF	11.56 ± 0.15^e	142.60 ± 0.41^e	46.01 ± 0.35^e
Control	7.43 ± 0.20^f	81.06 ± 0.41^f	21.46 ± 0.15^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 15 min); AF30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 4. Influence of Aspergillus flavus and its mutants on elemental nutritional concentration in maize.

Fungi strains	Zinc (Zn) (mg/Kg) Tasseling (leaves)	Zinc (Zn) (mg/Kg) Harvest (whole plant)	Iron (Fe) (mg/Kg) Tasseling (leaves)	Iron (Fe) (mg/Kg) Harvest (whole plant)
AF15	38.93 ± 0.46^d	35.11 ± 0.12^d	133.36 ± 0.58^d	120.76 ± 0.70^d
AF30	43.20 ± 0.41^c	40.22 ± 0.20^c	143.16 ± 0.37^c	126.13 ± 0.32^c
AF60	45.20 ± 0.40^b	41.21 ± 0.20^b	165.06 ± 0.59^b	133.40 ± 0.20^b
AF90	48.95 ± 0.47^a	45.01 ± 0.62^a	178.34 ± 0.41^a	142.20 ± 0.60^a
Wild AF	37.06 ± 0.61^e	32.36 ± 0.40^e	121.33 ± 0.5^e	101.73 ± 0.70^e
Control	21.73 ± 0.41^f	20.46 ± 0.41^f	89.13 ± 0.31^f	70.20 ± 0.31^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV15 min); AF30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 5. Influence of phosphorus solubilizing fungus Aspergillus flavus and its mutant on key nutrient concentration in maize.

Fungi strains	Nitrogen (N) % Tasseling (leaves)	Nitrogen (N) % Harvest (whole plant)	Phosphorus (P) % Tasseling (leaves)	Phosphorus (P) % Harvest (whole plant)	Potassium (K) % Tasseling (leaves)	Potassium (K) % Harvest (whole plant)
AF15	1.63 ± 0.02^d	0.52 ± 0.03^d	0.37 ± 0.02^d	0.29 ± 0.02^d	2.42 ± 0.02^d	1.61 ± 0.01^d
AF30	1.74 ± 0.02^c	0.63 ± 0.02^c	0.41 ± 0.01^c	0.32 ± 0.02^c	2.66 ± 0.03^c	1.94 ± 0.02^c
AF60	1.85 ± 0.03^b	0.95 ± 0.02^b	0.44 ± 0.03^b	0.37 ± 0.02^b	3.72 ± 0.02^b	2.13 ± 0.03^b
AF90	2.01 ± 0.07^a	0.98 ± 0.01^a	0.57 ± 0.01^a	0.42 ± 0.01a	3.96 ± 0.01^a	2.83 ± 0.02^a
Wild AF	1.54 ± 0.01^e	0.54 ± 0.02^e	0.36 ± 0.01^e	0.24 ± 0.01^e	2.04 ± 0.03^e	1.43 ± 0.02^e
Control	1.43 ± 0.04^f	0.44 ± 0.02^f	0.31 ± 0.01^f	0.21 ± 0.01^f	1.97 ± 0.02^f	1.23 ± 0.01^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV15 min); AF30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 6. Nutrient uptake by maize (mg/pot) treated with wild and mutant strains of A. flavus.

Treatment	Phosphorus uptake (mg/pot)	Nitrogen uptake (mg/pot)	Potassium uptake (mg/pot)	Magnesium uptake (mg/pot)
AF15	50.2 ± 0.20^d	273.66 ± 2.51^d	721.66 ± 1.52^d	153.66 ± 3.05^d
AF30	73.16 ± 0.21^c	294.66 ± 2.52^c	751.66 ± 2.08^c	162.66 ± 2.51^c
AF60	86.56 ± 0.15^b	361.33 ± 1.52^b	762.66 ± 2.51^b	173.33 ± 1.52^b
AF90	92.23 ± 0.21^a	376.66 ± 2.51^a	794.33 ± 1.53^a	185.66 ± 1.52^a
Wild AF	47.30 ± 0.26^e	265.33 ± 2.51^e	603.33 ± 2.51^e	123.33 ± 2.51e
Control	23.36 ± 0.40^f	120.66 ± 1.53^f	403.00 ± 2.64^f	85.66 ± 3.21^f
Notes: Wild AF: Wild type Aspergillus flavus; AF15: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV15 min); AF30: Mutated strain Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 30 min); AF60: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 60 min); AF90: Mutated strain of Aspergillus flavus visible (UV 90 min). The different alphabet indicates significant difference compared to control pot without fungi inoculation.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

4. Discussion

In this study, Aspergillus flavus efficient strains in solubilizing phosphate were isolated and characterized. Also, the toxigenic screening assay for aflatoxin production was conducted on these strains and they were confirmed to be non-toxigenic. In both qualitative and quantitative phosphate solubilization assay analysis, these Aspergillus flavus strains were also confirmed as phosphate solubilizers. Thereafter, the influence of these fungi strains was tested on the agronomic growth parameters and mineral nutrient content of maize plants.

The highlights of this study are that efficient strains of non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus with the capability to solubilize phosphate can be beneficial in promoting both the agronomic growth parameters and increasing mineral nutrient content of maize plants.

The results obtained indicated that the A. flavus strains are efficient phosphate solubilizers and solubilize phosphate in broth culture to varying quantities. These results are similar to studies done by ^[24,25]. They all reported fungi that belong to the genus Aspergillus as phosphate solubilizers. Also, in a study by ^[26], it was reported that Aspergillus spp showed diverse levels of phosphate solubilization activity in broth culture using different mineral sources. Thus, it was explained that this solubilizing ability is due to their production of phosphate-degrading enzymes.

Besides, the results obtained for maize plant growth improvement showed that plant heights of the A. flavus strain treated pots were found to be more than the untreated control plant. Also, the germination percentage, shoot length, the number of leaves produced, as well as the maize grain yield at harvest were enhanced by the A. flavus strains inoculation treatment compared to the un-inoculated control. The results from our findings on the improvement of agronomic growth parameters correlate with reported outcomes of investigations of ^[27,28]. They reported that phosphate solubilizing fungi can increase plant heights in pot experiments and under field conditions. The results correlate with findings obtained by ^[29,30], whose work focused on the influence of fungi phosphate solubilizers on yield and nutritional content of maize (Zea mays L) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Their findings also recorded enhanced dry matter production of maize when inoculated with Penicillium spp and Aspergillus awamori.

Wang X ^[31], also noted that the application of phosphate-solubilizing fungi increases the growth of planted crops. Fungi that solubilize phosphates enhance agronomic growth parameters of planted crops and are key components of global sustainable agroecological productivity ^[32]. Their deployment as biofertilizers improve phosphate availability to crops and reduces the number of synthetic phosphate fertilizers required for planted crops ^[33,34]. Phosphate solubilizing fungi improve the growth of plants by the production of vital biomolecules like lytic enzymes, ACC deaminase, antimicrobial substances, siderophores, hormonal production, hydrogen cyanide, among others ^{[35,36,37,38,39]}.

The main mechanism of action of phosphate solubilizing fungi is by secretion of organic acids that chelates with phosphate ions, thereby releasing soluble phosphate ^[40]. Organic acids, thus, secreted, acidify the soil environment and thus solubilizing insoluble orthophosphate ions to soluble phosphate ions that plants can easily assimilate ^[41,42]. Our findings in this investigation of improvement in agronomic growth parameters and nutritional elemental contents of maize attributable to phosphate solubilizing Aspergillus flavus strains with biofertilizer capabilities further corroborates earlier research reports of phosphate solubilizers beneficial impacts on different crops ^[43,44,45].

Despite the impressive results obtained in this pot experimental trial of using phosphate solubilizing Aspergillus flavus strains to improve agronomic yield and nutritional content of maize plants, there is still ground to cover and questions needing answers. Further research studies on the improvement of phosphate solubilizing fungi at the genomic level to determine the genes that regulate phosphate solubilization need to be investigated. Also, experimental field studies on fungus' phosphate solubilizing ability to enhance the maize growth considering abiotic and biotic stressors should be looked into.

5. Conclusion

Results from these investigations indicated that mutated strains of Aspergillus flavus are efficient phosphate solubilizers and that when used as bioinoculants on maize plants, can lead to higher beneficial influence on agronomic yield and mineral nutrients composition in maize compared with the un-inoculated control. An addition to existing knowledge of using microbial inoculants as an alternative to synthetic phosphate fertilizer is highlighted in this study. Therefore, more research into diverse ecological habitats for beneficial microorganisms that can serve as biofertilizing agents/alternatives to synthetic agrochemicals for maize yield enhancement should be explored.

Acknowledgments

The authorities in LAUTECH and (NSPRI), Nigeria, are well appreciated.

Conflict of interest

The authors had no potential contrary interest.

References

[1]	Cautìn R, Agustì M (2005) Phenological growth stages of the cherimoya tree (Annona cherimola Mill.). Sci Hortic 105: 491–497. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.035
[2]	Bonavia D, Ochoa C, Tovar O, et al. (2004) Archaeological evidence of cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) and guanabana (Annona muricata L.) in ancient Perù. Econ Bot 58: 509–522.
[3]	Popenoe W (1920) Manual of tropical and subtropical fruits. The Macmillan Company, New York.
[4]	Ciferri R (1955) Sulle pretese raffigurazioni di ananas, mango ed annona, in pitture pompeiane. Rivista di ortoflorofrutticoltura italiana 39: 489–502.
[5]	Morettini A (1963) Frutticoltura generale e speciale. R.E.D.A., Roma.
[6]	Loizzo MR, Di Lecce G, Boselli E, et al. (2012) Radical scavenging, total antioxidant capacity, and antiproliferative activity of phenolic extracts from extra virgin olive oil by cultivar 'Frantoio'. Int J Food Prop 15: 1345–1357. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2010.522291
[7]	Monastra F (1997) Current Status of Annonaceae in Italy. Mesfin Newsletter 3: 11–12.
[8]	Calabrese F (1990) Incontro di studi sull'annona "Annona cherimola (Mill)". Edizione Laruffa, 31–42.
[9]	Caleca V, La Verde G, Ragusa S, et al. (2002) Insect and hand pollination of Annona spp. in Sicily. Phytophaga XII: 117–127.
[10]	Gazit S, Galon I, Podoler H (1982) The role of nitidulid beetles in natural pollination of Annona in Israel. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 107: 849–852.
[11]	Gottsberger G (1989) Comments on flower evolution and beetle pollination in the genera Annona and Rollinia. Plant Syst Evol 167: 189–194. doi: 10.1007/BF00936405
[12]	Lora J, Herrero M, Hormaza JI (2012) Pollen performance, cell number, and physiological state in the early-divergent angiosperm Annona cherimola Mill. (Annonaceae) are related to environmental conditions during the final stages of pollen development. Sex Plant Reprod 25:157–167.
[13]	Pal DK, Kumar PS (1995) Changes in the physicochemical and biochemical composition of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) fruits during growth, development, and ripening. J Hortic Sci 70: 569–572.
[14]	Pinto ACQ, Cordeiro MCR, de Andrade SRM, et al. (1994) Changes in sugar and organic acids in cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) fruit under controlled-atmosphere storage. J Agric Food Chem 42: 799–803.
[15]	Jyothi A, Venkatesh K, Chakrapani P, et al. (2011) Phytochemical and pharmacological potential of Annona cherimola-A review. Int J Phytomed 3: 439–447.
[16]	Pinillos V, Peinado S, González M (2013) Fruit development and maturation phenology of 'Fino de Jete' cherimoya. Acta Hortic 975: 335–342.
[17]	Torres WE, Sanchez LA (1992) Fruticultura Colombiana, Guanabano. (Spanish). ICA, Manual de Asistencia 57. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Bogota.
[18]	Prasanna V, Prabba TN, Tharanathan RN (2007) Fruit ripening phenomena-An overview, Critical Rev Food Sci Nutr 47: 1–19.
[19]	Biale JB, Young RE, Olmstead AJ (1954) Fruit respiration and ethylene production. Plant Physiol 29: 168–174. doi: 10.1104/pp.29.2.168
[20]	Brown BI, Wong LS, George AP, et al. (1988) Comparative studies on the postharvest physiology of fruit from different species of Annona (custard apple). J Hortic Sci 63: 521–528. doi: 10.1080/14620316.1988.11515887
[21]	Vanhove W, Van Damme P (2013) Value chains of cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) in a center of diversity and its on-farm conservation implications. Trop Conserv Sci 6: 158–180.
[22]	Andrés-Agustín J, González-Andrés F, Nieto-Ángel R, et al. (2006) Morphometry of the organs of cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) and analysis of fruit parameters for the characterization of cultivars, and Mexican germplasm selections. Sci Hort 107: 337–346.
[23]	Zalom FG, Goodell PB, Wilson LT, et al. (1983) Degree-Days: The calculation and use of heat units in pest management. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Leaflet, 10: 21373.
[24]	Stanley DW, Baker KW (2002) A simple laboratory exercise in food structure/texture relationships using a flatbed scanner. J Food Sci Educ 1: 6–9.
[25]	George AP, Nissen RJ, Ko HL (1986) Productivity of custard apple (Annona atemoya Hort.). Factors affecting yield and fruit size. Acta Hortic 175: 37–41.
[26]	McGuire RG (1992) Reporting of objective colour measurements. HortScience 27: 1254–1255. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254
[27]	Richardson AC, Anderson PA (1996) Hand pollination effects on the set and development of cherimoya (Annona cherimola) fruit in a humid climate. Sci Hortic 65: 273–281. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(96)00878-3
[28]	Pagès J (2005) Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual Prefer 16: 642–649. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.01.006
[29]	Escribano MI, Del Cura B, Muñoz T, et al. (1997) The effect of high carbon dioxide at low temperature on ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase and polygalacturonase protein levels in cherimoya fruit. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122: 258–262. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.122.2.258
[30]	Sanchez JA, Zamorano JP, Alique R (1998) Polygalacturonase, cellulose and invertase activities during cherimoya fruit ripening. J Hortic Sci 73: 87–92.
[31]	Li C, Shen W, Lu W, et al. (2009) 1-MCP delayed softening and affected expression of XET and EXP genes in harvested cherimoya fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 52: 254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.12.009
[32]	Gutierrez M, Sola MM, Pascual L, et al. (1992) Ultrastructural changes in cherimoya fruit injured by chilling. Food Struct 11: 323–332.
[33]	Gutierrez M, Lahoz JM, Sola MM, et al. (1994) Postharvest changes in total soluble solids and tissue pH of cherimoya fruit stored at chilling and non-chilling temperatures. J Ortic Sci 69: 459–463.
[34]	Lahoz JM, Gutierrez M, Sola MM (1993) Ethylene in cherimoya fruit (Annona cherimola Mill.) under different storage conditions. J Agr Food Chem 41: 721–723.
[35]	Manrìquez DA, Munoz-Robredo P, Gudenschwager O, et al. (2014) Development of flavor-related metabolites in cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) fruit and their relationship with ripening physiology. Postharvest Biol Technol 94: 58–65.
[36]	Bruinsma J, Paull RE (1984) Respiration during postharvest development of soursop fruit, Annona muricata L. Plant Physiol 76: 131–138. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.1.131
[37]	Gullo G, Dattola A, Sortino G, et al. (2019) Effect of fruit-set time on the quality performance of Annona cherimola mill. fruit in south Italy. Sci Hortic 246: 272–278.

This article has been cited by:

1.	Jamie Murphy, Frédérique Vallières, Richard P. Bentall, Mark Shevlin, Orla McBride, Todd K. Hartman, Ryan McKay, Kate Bennett, Liam Mason, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita, Anton P. Martinez, Thomas V. A. Stocks, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom, 2021, 12, 2041-1723, 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9
2.	Rose H. Manjili, Melika Zarei, Mehran Habibi, Masoud H. Manjili, COVID-19 as an Acute Inflammatory Disease, 2020, 205, 0022-1767, 12, 10.4049/jimmunol.2000413
3.	Leonardo Caputo, Giovanni Lentini, Solomon Habtemariam, Repurposing therapeutic agents and herbal medicines to defeat viral nemesis, 2020, 81, 0272-4391, 641, 10.1002/ddr.21668
4.	Naser F. Al-Tannak, Ladislav Novotny, Adel Alhunayan, Remdesivir—Bringing Hope for COVID-19 Treatment, 2020, 88, 2218-0532, 29, 10.3390/scipharm88020029
5.	Soumya Banerjee, Mitigating the Impact of Covid-19 in Conflict Zones, 2020, 18, 13344676, 446, 10.7906/indecs.18.4.4
6.	Jonas B. Sandbrink, Gregory D. Koblentz, Biosecurity risks associated with vaccine platform technologies, 2021, 0264410X, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.023
7.	Oyewale Tomori, Matthew Olatunji Kolawole, Ebola virus disease: current vaccine solutions, 2021, 71, 09527915, 27, 10.1016/j.coi.2021.03.008
8.	Andrey Romanyuk, Ruixue Wang, Alexander Marin, Benjamin M. Janus, Eric I. Felner, Dengning Xia, Yenny Goez-Gazi, Kendra J. Alfson, Abdul S. Yunus, Eric A. Toth, Gilad Ofek, Ricardo Carrion, Mark R. Prausnitz, Thomas R. Fuerst, Alexander K. Andrianov, Skin Vaccination with Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Using a Polyphosphazene-Based Microneedle Patch Protects Mice against Lethal Challenge, 2022, 14, 2079-4983, 16, 10.3390/jfb14010016
9.	Nadezhda Duffy, Dana Bruden, Harold Thomas, Erin Nichols, Barbara Knust, Thomas Hennessy, Mary R Reichler, James Bangura, Charles Keimbe, Amara Jambai, Oliver Morgan, Ismail Farmar, Francis Davies, Mohamed Sima Dumbuya, Hannah Kamara, Mohamed Kallon, Joseph Kpukumu, Sheku Abu, Fatmata Bangura, Saidu Rahim Bangura, Tomeh Bangura, Hassan Benya, Sandi Blango, Imurana Conteh, Peter Conteh, Bintu Jabbie, Sheku Jabbie, Luseni Kamara, Francis Lansana, Maada Rogers, Sahr Brima Sewa, Matthew Yamba, P Bessler, Faith Washburn, E Ervin, S Campbell, W Chung, S Hersey, Risk factors for Ebola virus disease among household care providers, Sierra Leone, 2015, 2022, 51, 0300-5771, 1457, 10.1093/ije/dyac081
10.	Saskia Wilhelmy, Regina Müller, Dominik Gross, Identifying the scope of ethical challenges caused by the Ebola epidemic 2014-2016 in West Africa: a qualitative study, 2022, 17, 1747-5341, 10.1186/s13010-022-00128-y
11.	Daniel Mukadi-Bamuleka, Junior Bulabula-Penge, Anja De Weggheleire, Bart K M Jacobs, François Edidi-Atani, Fabrice Mambu-Mbika, Placide Mbala-Kingebeni, Sheila Makiala-Mandanda, Martin Faye, Cheick T Diagne, Moussa M Diagne, Oumar Faye, Masahiro Kajihara, Ousmane Faye, Ayato Takada, Amadou A Sall, Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, Johan van Griensven, Kevin K Ariën, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke, Field performance of three Ebola rapid diagnostic tests used during the 2018–20 outbreak in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: a retrospective, multicentre observational study, 2022, 22, 14733099, 891, 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00675-7
12.	Paula Mc Kenna, Serge Masyn, Annik Willems, Anne De Paepe, Romain Rutten, Jean Baptiste Mazarati, Felix Sayinzoga, Etienne Karita, Jean Nepo Nduwamungu, Amelia Mazzei, Julien Nyombayire, Rosine Ingabire, Monica Amponsah, Seth Gogo Egoeh, Nnamdi Ezeanochie, Leapfrogging with technology: introduction of a monitoring platform to support a large-scale Ebola vaccination program in Rwanda, 2021, 17, 2164-5515, 3192, 10.1080/21645515.2021.1920872
13.	Abigail E. Powell, Duo Xu, Gillie A. Roth, Kaiming Zhang, Wah Chiu, Eric A. Appel, Peter S. Kim, Multimerization of Ebola GPΔmucin on protein nanoparticle vaccines has minimal effect on elicitation of neutralizing antibodies, 2022, 13, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.942897
14.	Emmanuel Gbenga Dada, David Opeoluwa Oyewola, Stephen Bassi Joseph, Onyeka Emebo, Olugbenga Oluseun Oluwagbemi, Ensemble Machine Learning for Monkeypox Transmission Time Series Forecasting, 2022, 12, 2076-3417, 12128, 10.3390/app122312128
15.	Kimberly A. Hofmeyer, Katherine M. Bianchi, Daniel N. Wolfe, Utilization of Viral Vector Vaccines in Preparing for Future Pandemics, 2022, 10, 2076-393X, 436, 10.3390/vaccines10030436
16.	Patrick J. Arena, Camille Dzogang, Adva Gadoth, Dalau Mukadi Nkamba, Nicole A. Hoff, David Kampilu, Michael Beia, Hui-Lee Wong, Steven A. Anderson, Didine Kaba, Anne W. Rimoin, Comparison of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes using archival medical records before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a facility-based, retrospective cohort study, 2023, 23, 1471-2393, 10.1186/s12884-022-05291-w
17.	Ozzie Anis, The Kivu Ebola Epidemic, 2022, 9, 20024436, 1, 10.15347/WJM/2022.001
18.	Anne Hauner, Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa, Kevin K. Ariën, Sample-to-result molecular diagnostic platforms and their suitability for infectious disease testing in low- and middle-income countries, 2024, 24, 1473-7159, 423, 10.1080/14737159.2024.2353690
19.	Gnakub Norbert Soke, Peter Fonjungo, Gisele Mbuyi, Richard Luce, John Klena, Mary Choi, John Kombe, Gerry Makaya, Francis Mbuyi, Henriette Bulambo, Mathias Mossoko, Celestin Mwanzembe, Bienvenu Ikomo, Pierre Adikey, Joel Montgomery, Trevor Shoemaker, Placide Mbala, Giulia Earle-Richardson, Dieudonne Mwamba, Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Continuous Community Engagement Is Needed to Improve Adherence to Ebola Response Activities and Survivorship During Ebola Outbreaks, 2024, 12, 2169-575X, e2300006, 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00006
20.	Abdihamid Warsame, Gwendolen Eamer, Alaria Kai, Lucia Robles Dios, Hana Rohan, Patrick Keating, Jacques Katshishi, Francesco Checchi, Performance of a safe and dignified burial intervention during an Ebola epidemic in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2018–2019, 2023, 21, 1741-7015, 10.1186/s12916-023-03194-x
21.	Rosine Ingabire, Julien Nyombayire, Amelia Mazzei, Jean-Baptiste Mazarati, Jozef Noben, Michael Katwere, Rachel Parker, Sabin Nsanzimana, Kristin M. Wall, Tyronza Sharkey, Felix Sayinzoga, Amanda Tichacek, Niina Hammoud, Ellen Martinson, Ben Magod, Susan Allen, Etienne Karita, Rebecca F. Grais, Contraception use and pregnancy in women receiving a 2-dose Ebola vaccine in Rwanda: A retrospective analysis of UMURINZI vaccination campaign data, 2025, 22, 1549-1676, e1004508, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004508
22.	Marie Michele Umulisa, Aline Umutoni Uwizera, Nnamdi Ezeanochie, Jozef Noben, Ellen Pagan Indoe, Malick Kayumba, Rosette Busasa, Grace Umutoni, Alice Mushimiyimana, Philbert Kayitare, Roselyne Ingabire, Patience Sindayigaya, Roseline Dzekem Dine, Community members’ knowledge, attitude, and practices towards Ebola virus prevention in the Western Province of Rwanda, 2025, 44, 2072-1315, 10.1186/s41043-025-00741-5

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Agriculture and Food

1.9 3.7

Metrics

Article views(4626) PDF downloads(522) Cited by(2)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6) / Tables(7)

AIMS Agriculture and Food

Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and method

2.1. Experimental location

2.2. Isolating fungi phosphate solubilizers

2.3. Determination of Aflatoxin-production potential of Aspergillus flavus using cultural screening method

2.4. Strain improvement

2.5. Phosphate solubilization assay

2.6. Pot trial experiment

2.7. Statistical data analysis

3. Results

3.1. Phosphate solubilizing activity of Aspergillus flavus

3.2. Pot trial experiment

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Agriculture and Food

Comparative study of some fruit quality characteristics of two of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in southern Italy

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and method

2.1. Experimental location

2.2. Isolating fungi phosphate solubilizers

2.3. Determination of Aflatoxin-production potential of Aspergillus flavus using cultural screening method

2.4. Strain improvement

2.5. Phosphate solubilization assay

2.6. Pot trial experiment

2.7. Statistical data analysis

3. Results

3.1. Phosphate solubilizing activity of Aspergillus flavus

3.2. Pot trial experiment

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog