
Bipolar disorder is a psychiatric condition that consists of recurring episodes of severe mood swings between depression and manic episodes. The diagnosis is generally based on clinical interviews and observations, but is often misdiagnosed as unipolar depression, leading to significant delays in treatment. However, the disorder's heterogeneous nature and overlap with other psychiatric conditions, such as schizophrenia, present challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. To address these challenges, this study aims to explore the gene targets of differentially expressed miRNA associated with differentially expressed genes and to find a suitable phytochemical through molecular docking studies. The altered expression level of miRNAs (either increased or decreased) and genes had been observed to play a crucial role in different psychiatric disorders, thus suggesting their potential as biomarkers. The data of patients with bipolar disorder was retrieved from the Gene expression omnibus and Sequence read archive. The differentially expressed genes and miRNAs were identified through DESeq2 post processing. The gene targets of the downregulated miRNA and the upregulated genes were compared to identify the main targets of bipolar disorder. Furthermore, the phytochemicals with neuro-protective properties were identified through a literature study. The drug likeness property of each phytochemical was evaluated on the basis of Lipinski's rule of 5, followed by a toxicity evaluation. Molecular docking studies were carried out using AutoDock to determine the best drug against bipolar disorder. Therefore, the present study targets key proteins overexpressed in patients with bipolar disorder to facilitate a multi-faceted treatment approach.
Citation: Harshita Maheshwari, Maitreyi Pathak, Prekshi Garg, Prachi Srivastava. Computational analysis reveals the therapeutic potential of Asiatic acid against the miRNA correlated differentially expressed genes of bipolar disorder[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(2): 99-115. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024007
[1] | Irene Mwongeli Waita, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Samson Muuo, Naomi Maina, Daniel Kariuki, Cleophas M. Kyama . Differential expression and functional analysis of micro RNAs in Papio anubis induced with endometriosis for early detection of the disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(4): 305-327. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020015 |
[2] | Chisato Kinoshita, Koji Aoyama, Toshio Nakaki . microRNA as a new agent for regulating neuronal glutathione synthesis and metabolism. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 124-143. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.124 |
[3] | Mairembam Stelin Singh, PV Parvati Sai Arun, Mairaj Ahmed Ansari . Unveiling common markers in COVID-19: ADAMTS2, PCSK9, and OLAH emerged as key differential gene expression profiles in PBMCs across diverse disease conditions. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(2): 189-205. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024011 |
[4] | Marwa M. Esawy, Amir Abd-elhameed, Alshimaa L. Abdallah, Maha E. Alsadik, Elsayed S. Abd elbaser, Marwa A. Shabana, Rania M. Abdullah . Long noncoding RNA HULC is an independent predictor of COVID-19 severity and mortality in relation to microRNA-9 and IL-6. AIMS Molecular Science, 2022, 9(2): 79-90. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022005 |
[5] | Jin Hwan Do . Genome-wide transcriptional comparison of MPP+ treated human neuroblastoma cells with the state space model. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 440-460. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.440 |
[6] | Sarmishta Mukhopadhyay, Sayak Ganguli, Santanu Chakrabarti . Shigella pathogenesis: molecular and computational insights. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(2): 99-121. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020007 |
[7] | Yutaka Takihara, Ryuji Otani, Takuro Ishii, Shunsuke Takaoka, Yuki Nakano, Kaori Inoue, Steven Larsen, Yoko Ogino, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma, Fumiaki Uchiumi . Characterization of the human IDH1 gene promoter. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023013 |
[8] | Rim Khelifi, Afef Jelloul, Houda Ajmi, Wafa Slimani, Sarra Dimassi, Khouloud Rjiba, Manel Dardour, Moez Gribaa, Ali Saad, Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli . Toward autism spectrum disorders and Williams-Beuren syndrome co-occurrence condition in Tunisian patients: Genetic insights. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(4): 379-394. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024023 |
[9] | Madhan Srinivasamurthy, Nagaraj Kakanahalli, Shreeshail V. Benakanal . A truncation mutation in the L1CAM gene in a child with hydrocephalus. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(4): 223-232. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021017 |
[10] | Jin Hwan Do . Apomorphine-induced pathway perturbation in MPP+-treated SH-SY5Y cells. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 271-287. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.271 |
Bipolar disorder is a psychiatric condition that consists of recurring episodes of severe mood swings between depression and manic episodes. The diagnosis is generally based on clinical interviews and observations, but is often misdiagnosed as unipolar depression, leading to significant delays in treatment. However, the disorder's heterogeneous nature and overlap with other psychiatric conditions, such as schizophrenia, present challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. To address these challenges, this study aims to explore the gene targets of differentially expressed miRNA associated with differentially expressed genes and to find a suitable phytochemical through molecular docking studies. The altered expression level of miRNAs (either increased or decreased) and genes had been observed to play a crucial role in different psychiatric disorders, thus suggesting their potential as biomarkers. The data of patients with bipolar disorder was retrieved from the Gene expression omnibus and Sequence read archive. The differentially expressed genes and miRNAs were identified through DESeq2 post processing. The gene targets of the downregulated miRNA and the upregulated genes were compared to identify the main targets of bipolar disorder. Furthermore, the phytochemicals with neuro-protective properties were identified through a literature study. The drug likeness property of each phytochemical was evaluated on the basis of Lipinski's rule of 5, followed by a toxicity evaluation. Molecular docking studies were carried out using AutoDock to determine the best drug against bipolar disorder. Therefore, the present study targets key proteins overexpressed in patients with bipolar disorder to facilitate a multi-faceted treatment approach.
Bipolar disorder is a challenging neurological condition that is described by repetitive episodes of depression and mania, involving extreme mood swings that can have a considerable amount of influence on an individual's daily experiences [1]. People suffering from bipolar disorder will encounter periods of intense sadness or depression, as well as periods of heightened mood, known as mania or hypomania [2]. The underlying molecular process contributing to the development and advancement of bipolar disorder remain puzzling. Still, unfolding evidence hints that dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) in bipolar disorder play a key role in the physiopathology of the given disorder. MicroRNAs are non-coding small (approximately 21 nucleotides) [3],[4] RNA molecules that govern gene expression post transcriptionally by binding to mRNA transcripts, and thus either inhibit their translation or promote their degradation. It is well established that miRNAs play crucial roles in the regulation of various biological processes, including metabolism, growth, development, and cell differentiation. These miRNAs are highly conserved across eukaryotic cells and are considered evolutionary ancient genes with a significant importance in gene regulation. RNA polymerase II polymerizes the genes for miRNA, resulting in the production of primary miRNAs (Pri-miRNAs). These Pri-miRNAs are subsequently cleaved by a microprocessor complex within the nucleus, generating stem-loop structures known as precursor miRNAs. Then, the precursor miRNAs are taken to the cytoplasm and are cleaved by DICER to form mature miRNAs; these miRNAs can further modulate gene expression by guiding the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to target mRNAs, thus leading to either their degradation or translational repression. Considering that the human genome contains approximately 1900 miRNA genes, [3] many of which are implicated in human diseases, it is increasingly important to employ appropriate methods to study the expression and regulation of miRNAs in both physiological and pathological contexts.
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are kind of genes whose expression level or read count are significantly different from others between two experimental conditions, such as in a patient and in a healthy person [5]. DEGs play the most important part of clinical and pharmaceutical research, as they can easily help to identify therapeutic targets, biomarkers, and molecular signatures for a particular diagnosis [6]. The identification of DEGs have increased our understanding of bipolar disorder; unfortunately, the treatment has not advanced. Several research studies have used in silico methods to find genes that are differently expressed in bipolar disorder. In a study, a group of genes that were differentially expressed in the prefrontal cortex of people with bipolar disorder were identified using gene expression data from postmortem brain samples [7]. One study showed that lithium is the one of the most commonly used treatments for bipolar disorder [8]. Due to many limitations and a lack of research, the main therapeutic phytochemical that should be used as a drug in bipolar disorder is still not understood [9].
This research about bipolar disorder, a disease characterized by recurring instances of mania and depression, examines whether the medicinal plant Centella asiatica might prove to be of great help. We performed an in-silico analysis to explore the interaction between microRNAs (miRNAs) and genes that play key roles in bipolar disorder's neural circuitry. MiRNAs, small non-coding RNA molecules who regulate gene expression, are scrutinized for their connections to the disorder's major receptors. This investigation aims to discern whether Centella asiatica could be efficacious to mitigate bipolar disorder's impact by influencing miRNA expression. Our study ties traditional herbal knowledge with modern computational wisdoms, thus presenting a potential channel to evolve our understanding and treatment of bipolar disorder.
This study uses transcriptomic RNA-sequencing data of patient and control samples. As shown in Figure 1, the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [10], the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) [11], and the PubMed databases from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) were used for data retrieval as the major platform for the collection of samples and related information.
FASTQC was used to check the quality of each sample [12]. FASTQC is a widely used tool for quality control of high-throughput sequencing data; it assesses the quality and composition of sequencing reads in FASTQ files. The input involved utilizing FASTQ files, which were processed and read; the results are presented in the form of plots, except for basic statistics and overrepresented sequences. Low-quality bases, adapters, and unwanted sequences from the sample sequence were removed using Trim Galore and Trimmomatic tools. Trimming improves the data quality, normalizes the read length, mitigates biases, and enhances the accuracy of downstream analyses. FASTQC, Trim Galore, and Trimmomatics were accessed from the GALAXY server [13].
The reference genome of Homo sapiens (h38) was aligned to all the samples utilized in this study using MiRDeep2 mapper and the Hisat2 tool [14],[15]. MiRdeep2 Mapper utilizes the mapping program Bowtie to perform the alignment and is specifically designed to map miRNA reads to a reference genome and to identify potential miRNA candidates. The hierarchical index of the human genome in HISAT is comprised of 48,000 local Ferragina-Manzini (FM) indexes that represent 64,000bp genomic regions. Once the Alignment was completed, MiRDeep2 quantifier and feature counts were used to count the number of expressed miRNAs and genes in the control and patient samples [16],[17].
The differentially expressed miRNAs and genes were identified using the DESeq2 package [18]. DESeq2 is a very commonly used package to visualize and differentially analyze the count data by utilizing a negative binomial distribution; moreover, it assesses the relationship between the mean and the variance in the count data, which were obtained through high throughput sequencing assays.
The downregulated miRNA that was identified earlier was further used for the gene target identification. The gene targets of the miRNAs were identified using TargetScan and DIANA [19]. A popular belief is that miRNA binds to the 3′-UTRs of the targets transcript with the help of complementary base pairing in either one of the two classes of binding patterns. This understanding has led to the development of TargetScan and DIANA.
The gene target list of differentially expressed miRNA and differentially expressed genes was added to make a vein diagram to identify the differentially miRNA associated genes using Venny [20]. A Venn diagram is a graphical representation that used to identify the list of common genes found in both of the two different spaces; it can also be thought of as a union feature of sets.
The differentially expressed genes were identified and the mutational variants were discovered using variation viewer, which is a tool that enables the user to search, view, and navigate variations accumulated in ClinVar (Database that stores information about relationship between human health and variations), dbSNPs (Database for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), and dbVar (Database of large scale genomic variants) with reference to genomics. The basis of the searches can be the gene name, chromosomal locations, phenotypes, or variant ID of dbVar and dbSNPs; the results can be explored with the help of annotated tables of variations and a dynamic sequence viewer.
After going through some already published papers on PubMed Central, we identified certain antipsychotic drugs that could act as therapeutics that targeted our associated genes. The compound for Lipinski's Rule of 5 was discovered using Molinspiration [21], which is an online tool to validate for drug likeness, which requires the Smile structure of the phytochemical. For the final selection of our compound, we performed a toxicity check using ProTox II [22].
To identify the drug binding to all associated miRNA genes, we performed docking using AutoDock 4.2 [23]. AutoDock 4.2 comprehends the binding interactions between a ligand (phytochemical molecule) and a receptor/target (the protein coded by our gene) and uses a Lamarckian genetic algorithm as a search algorithm to reduce the ligand scoring function. Finally, we performed Cygwin for molecular docking and analyzed our potential drug for bipolar disorder.
The transcriptomic RNA-sequencing sample of patients with bipolar disorder were retrieved from the GEO dataset of the NCBI. The selection of samples was performed under certain criteria, which included the age of the sample (studies should range between 40–55 years old), the species (which should be Homo sapiens in bipolar patients), and the experiment type (which included profiling by high throughput screening); illumine instruments should be preferably used for sequencing, the library source should be a transcriptomic data type, the library selection should include complimentary DNA (cDNA), and the considered disease should be neurological, hence the sample data should also be taken from somewhere within the brain. For the present study, a 2-year time frame between 2016–2018 was considered for data retrieval. Table 1 enlists the GEO datasets taken for the present study.
Accession ID | Control Samples | Patient Samples | Tissue type | Age | Gender | Postpartum interval (PMI) |
GSE80336 [24] | 2 | 1 | Dorsal striatum | Control: 47,55 Patient: 51 |
Female | 21.66–35.08 |
GSE112523 [25] | 12 | 5 | Frontal cortex of human brain | Control: 40–54 Patient: 40–55 |
4 Female; 13 Male | 9.5–28.3 |
GSE78936 [26] | 12 | 16 | Brain | Control: 41.8 (Average) Patient: 47.7 (Average) |
11 Female; 17 Male | 30.2–41.9 (Average) |
The DESeq2 package in R was used to identify the DEGs. The criteria established to identify the upregulated DEGs was a p adjusted value less than 0.05 and a log2foldchange greater than 0. The number of upregulated genes obtained after performing the metanalysis (i.e., the data analysis technique) involved combining all the individual studies to produce a combined result; from this, we obtained 327 upregulated DEGs.
The DESeq2 package in R was used to identify DEGs and miRNAs. MiRNAs with a p adjusted value less than 0.10 and a log2foldchange less than 2 were considered as downregulated miRNAs. The study identified only 1 downregulated miRNA among patients with bipolar disorder, hsa-miR-3960, which had a p-adjusted value of 0.08 and a log2foldchange of −2.98.
After identifying a differentially expressed miRNA, we obtained 485 gene targets from targetscan and 58 gene targets from the DIANA tool. The total non-duplicate gene targets, which were selected from both DIANA and targetscan, were found to be 489.
Three common genes between differentially expressed miRNAs and genes identified with the help of a Venn diagram were found to be CITED, NUDT4, and Arl8B, as mentioned in Figure 2. These three genes have been found to play a major role in regulating bipolar disorder.
Variants in the DEGs were identified using Variation Viewer. Those variations that either had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic clinical significance were retrieved from the Variation Viewer database. Most of the mutations that were identified as pathogenic in CITED2, ARL8b, and NUDT4 were copy number variations. The details of the variants and their clinical significance in the gene of interest are listed in Table 2.
S. No. | Variant ID | Type of variant | Clinical significance |
CITED2 | |||
1 | nsv3877040 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
2 | nsv3879811 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3887898 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3889814 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv39199111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3919111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3915150 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3904441 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv6112726 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv4675250 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3911993 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
14 | nsv6314818 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv4350212 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3911164 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3916499 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
18 | nsv3891146 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
19 | rs1583066622 | Single nucleotide variant | Likely-Pathogenic |
20 | rs531316452 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
21 | rs779637348 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
1 | nsv4436544 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic |
2 | nsv6112759 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3885606 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3880617 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv3876280 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3878718 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3879068 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3885461 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3887038 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3887514 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv3889023 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv3889705 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3895550 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
14 | nsv4674715 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv6313525 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3873053 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3875223 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
NUDT4 | |||
nsv3904242 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3905447 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3897722 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3914194 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3904719 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv4456763 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3911770 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic | |
nsv3924338 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
Following an intensive data mining procedure, a few neuroprotective phytochemicals were selected, which went through certain levels of selection, that is, they were finalized if they were found to follow Lipinski's rule of 5 and did not exceed the toxic class IV, thus signifying that they were not harmful if swallowed at concentrations below 300mg/kg. The toxicity class and allowed dosage of the phytochemicals is listed in Table 3 below.
S. No. | Compound | Source | Toxicity class | Dosage (mg/kg) | Ref. |
1 | Arecholine | Arecha catechu (supari in India) | 4 | 550 | [27] |
2 | Leucine | Curcubita pepo (pumpkin) | 6 | 10000 | [28] |
3 | Betaine | Beta vulgaris (beetroot) | 4 | 650 | [29] |
4 | Morin | Alliuma cepa (onion) | 5 | 3915 | [30] |
5 | Anaferine | Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) | 4 | 338 | [31] |
6 | Allicin | Allium sativum (Garlic) | 4 | 874 | [32] |
7 | Curcumin | Curcuma longa (Turmeric) | 4 | 2000 | [33] |
8 | Asiatic acid | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 2000 | [34] |
9 | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | Ginko bibloba | 4 | 500 | [35] |
10 | Sulphoraphanes | All cruciferous plants | 4 | 1000 | [36] |
11 | Atrpohine Hyoscyamine | Datura | 4 | 380 | [37] |
12 | Resveratrol | Red grapes | 4 | 1560 | [38] |
13 | Glycine | Glycine max (soybean) | 5 | 3340 | [39] |
14 | Luteolin | Salvia osmarinus (rosemary) | 5 | 3919 | [40] |
15 | Gallic acid | Camellia sinensis (tea plant) | 4 | 2000 | [41] |
16 | β-asarone | Acorus calamus (Sweet flag) | 4 | 418 | [42] |
17 | α-Cyperone | Cyperus rotundus (Nut grass) | 4 | 1720 | [43] |
18 | Thymoquinone | Nigella sativa (Kalonji) | 5 | 2400 | [44] |
19 | Apegenin | Oroxylum indicum | 5 | 2500 | [45] |
20 | Costunolide | Costus speciosus (pushkarmula) | 5 | 3140 | [46] |
21 | Triterpenoids | Abroma augusta | 4 | 664 | [47] |
22 | Eugenol | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 1390 | [48] |
23 | Scopoletin | Aegle marmelos (bael) | 5 | 3800 | [49] |
24 | α-santalol | Santalum album (Sandalwood) | 5 | 3800 | [50] |
Molecular docking was performed with the three identified genes as targets and the selected phytochemicals as ligands; the finalized compound that had the highest binding energy will all three of our gene/targets was found to be Asiatic acid. This signifies that this ligand can serve as the best possible phytochemical among this given list for managing bipolar disorder. The interactions of the molecular docking complex were visualized using the Discovery Studio Visualizer [51]. The binding energy of the phytochemicals with the protein receptor is given in Table 4 below. The results are shown in Figures 3–5 below.
S. No. | Ligand name | CITED2 target binding energy (kcal/mol) | ARL8B target binding energy (kcal/mol) | NUDT4 target binding energy (kcal/mol) |
1. | α-cyperone | −6.79 | −5.55 | −5.98 |
2. | α-santalol | −5.95 | −5.33 | −4.67 |
3. | Allicin | −3.75 | −3.86 | −3.66 |
4. | Anaferine | −4.41 | −7.42 | −6.42 |
5. | Apigenin | −4.48 | −5.51 | −5.92 |
6. | Arecholine | −4.83 | −5.90 | −5.02 |
7. | Asiatic acid | −7.10 | −6.96 | −9.22 |
8. | β-asarone | −6.28 | −4.46 | −4.86 |
9. | Betaine | −3.64 | −4.19 | −3.14 |
10. | Costunolide | −7.76 | −7.09 | −6.63 |
11. | Curcumin | −3.72 | −5.19 | −4.66 |
12. | Eugenol | −3.91 | −4.39 | −4.47 |
13. | Gallic acid | −5.32 | −6.25 | −5.66 |
14. | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | −5.92 | −7.91 | −6.42 |
15. | Glycine | −4.95 | −4.14 | −4.27 |
16. | Atropine | −4.91 | −7.06 | −6.56 |
17. | Leucine | −3.47 | −5.05 | −3.78 |
18. | Luteolin | −6.27 | −5.93 | −5.85 |
19. | Morin | −6.60 | −5.35 | −4.82 |
20. | Resveratrol | −5.45 | −6.25 | −5.02 |
21. | Scopoletin | −5.44 | −5.41 | −5.23 |
22. | Sulphoraphanes | −3.75 | −4.60 | −4.47 |
23. | Thymoquinone | −5.40 | −5.29 | −4.97 |
24. | Triterpenoids | −7.02 | −7.23 | −7.39 |
Bipolar disorder is a substantial mood disorder that has a notable impact on both psychosocial and economic aspects. Despite being more prevalent than previously believed, it has received comparatively less research attention compared to disorders such as schizophrenia and major depression. There has been a growing need to focus on this disorder, as the global lifetime prevalence rate of bipolar disorder lies well within the range of 1.4–6.4% [52]; moreover, it is an incapacitating condition with substantial risk of mortality, presenting a 20 times greater suicide risk than the normal unaffected population [53].
Previous studies have fascinatingly revealed the key role of hsa-mir-3960 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, which is a neurodegenerative disorder in which a patient gradually loses control over voluntary muscles [54]; the primary etiology of this disease has still not been discovered, but can be associated with neuronal degeneration. In this study, hsa-mir-3960 has emerged as the sole downregulated miRNA when the metanalysis was performed. Therefore, hsa-mir-3960 appears to play a key role in neuronal degradation.
This study revealed three miRNA-associated genes: CITED2, NUDT4, and Arl8B. A subsequently analysis disclosed CITED2's substantial role in governing neocortical layer II/III formation, the development of somatosensory callosal sensory projection neurons [55], and its involvement in neuroinflammation [56]. Additionally, this study highlights the pivotal role of neuroinflammation in mood-related disorders such as bipolar disorder. Moreover, CITED2 was found to minimize the pathogenic responses of innate immune cells by moderating a broad spectrum of inflammatory genes in macrophages, thus offering protection against harmful inflammation [57]. Arl8B emerged as a key regulator in neuronal connectivity, thereby directing axon branch positioning through the spatial control of autophagy [58] and impacting the mobility of lysosomes [59]. Most interesting, Arl8B has been identified as a novel biomarker for Alzheimer's disease [60]. NUDT4, or nudix hydrolase 4, regulates the degradation of diphosphoinositol polyphosphates, which are high-energy molecules [61]; on this note, a captivating study has suggested that targeting the enzyme responsible for dephosphorylating diphosphoinositol polyphosphates could serve as a novel therapeutic strategy for bipolar disorder, which potentially involves lithium therapy [62].
Through molecular docking of the three identified genes, the neuroprotective antipsychotic drug was finally found to be Asiatic acid, which is one of the main components of Centella Asiatic. Its chemical formula is pentacyclic triterpenoid, C30H48O5, and its molecular weight is 488.70kD [63]. It is a medicinal plant which was culturally used to improve memory and learning [64]; additionally, it promotes nerve growth and dendric branching [65] and is involved in protecting neurons from oxidative stress [66]. A study supported our results by pointing out the role of Asiatic acid in preventing cognitive defects with the help of the preservation of synaptic and mitochondrial function [67]; Several studies in the past have also mentioned the effect of mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of bipolar disorder [68]. Asiatic acid is helpful to prevent oxidative stress and apoptosis by restraining the movement of α-synuclein into the mitochondria [69]. This actively plays a key role as a neuroprotectant in cerebral ischemia [70].
In conclusion, this computational analysis provides a promising avenue for a therapeutic breakthrough in the vast field of bipolar disorder by exploring miRNA-correlated DEGs. This study underlines 3 notable genes, namely CITED2, NUDT4, and Arl8B, as significant regulators, thus implying the multifaceted therapeutic role of Asiatic acid in managing bipolar disorder. These findings extend promising prospects for targeted therapies to manage bipolar disorder.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
[1] | Jain A, Mitra P (2023) Bipolar disorder. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558998/. |
[2] | Hilty DM, Leamon MH, Lim RF, et al. (2006) A review of bipolar disorder in adults. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 3: 43-55. |
[3] |
Zhang N, Hu G, Myers TG, et al. (2019) Protocols for the analysis of microRNA expression, biogenesis, and function in immune cells. Curr Protoc Immunol 126: e78. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpim.78 ![]() |
[4] |
Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N (2008) Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight?. Nat Rev Genet 9: 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg229 ![]() |
[5] |
Anjum A, Jaggi S, Varghese E, et al. (2016) Identification of differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq data of arabidopsis thaliana: A compound distribution approach. J Comput Biol 23: 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2015.0205 ![]() |
[6] |
Rodriguez-Esteban R, Jiang X (2017) Differential gene expression in disease: a comparison between high-throughput studies and the literature. BMC Med Genomics 10: 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0293-y ![]() |
[7] |
Pfaffenseller B, da Silva Magalhães PV, De Bastiani MA, et al. (2016) Differential expression of transcriptional regulatory units in the prefrontal cortex of patients with bipolar disorder: potential role of early growth response gene 3. Transl Psychiatry 6: e805. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.78 ![]() |
[8] |
Machado-Vieira R, Manji HK, Zarate CA, et al. (2009) The role of lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder: convergent evidence for neurotrophic effects as a unifying hypothesis. Bipolar disord 11: 92-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00714.x ![]() |
[9] |
Qureshi NA, Al-Bedah AM (2013) Mood disorders and complementary and alternative medicine: A literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013: 639-658. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S43419 ![]() |
[10] |
Clough E, Barrett T (2016) The gene expression omnibus database. Statistical genomics. New York: Humana Press 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_5 ![]() |
[11] |
Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M (2011) International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res : D19-D21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1019 ![]() |
[12] | FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc |
[13] |
Jalili V, Afgan E, Gu Q, et al. (2020) The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update. Nucleic Acids Res 48: 8205-8207. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa554 ![]() |
[14] |
Friedländer MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, et al. (2012) miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr688 ![]() |
[15] |
Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12: 357-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317 ![]() |
[16] | Mackowiak SD (2011) Identification of novel and known miRNAs in deep-sequencing data with miRDeep2. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics . https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi1210s36 |
[17] |
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30: 923-930. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 ![]() |
[18] |
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15: 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 ![]() |
[19] |
Riffo-Campos ÁL, Riquelme I, Brebi-Mieville P (2016) Tools for sequence-based miRNA target prediction: What to choose?. Int J Mol Sci 17: 1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121987 ![]() |
[20] | Venny—An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams. Available from: https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html |
[21] | Molinspiration cheminformatics. Available from: https://molinspiration.com/ |
[22] |
Banerjee P, Eckert OA, Schrey AK, et al. (2018) ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res 46: W257-W263. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky318 ![]() |
[23] | Rizvi SMD, Shakil S, Haneef M (2013) A simple click by click protocol to perform docking: AutoDock 4.2 made easy for non-bioinformaticians. EXCLI J 12: 831-857. |
[24] |
Pacifico R, Davis RL (2017) Transcriptome sequencing implicates dorsal striatum-specific gene network, immune response and energy metabolism pathways in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 22: 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.94 ![]() |
[25] |
Pai S, Li P, Killinger B, et al. (2019) Differential methylation of enhancer at IGF2 is associated with abnormal dopamine synthesis in major psychosis. Nat Commun 10: 2046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09786-7 ![]() |
[26] |
Hu J, Xu J, Pang L, et al. (2016) Systematically characterizing dysfunctional long intergenic non-coding RNAs in multiple brain regions of major psychosis. Oncotarget 7: 71087-71098. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12122 ![]() |
[27] |
Xu Z, Adilijiang A, Wang W, et al. (2019) Arecoline attenuates memory impairment and demyelination in a cuprizone-induced mouse model of schizophrenia. Neuroreport 30: 134-138. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001172 ![]() |
[28] | Suresh P, Raju AB (2013) Antidopaminergic effects of leucine and genistein on shizophrenic rat models. Neurosciences 18: 235-241. |
[29] |
Lin JC, Lee MY, Chan MH, et al. (2016) Betaine enhances antidepressant-like, but blocks psychotomimetic effects of ketamine in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 233: 3223-3235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4359-x ![]() |
[30] |
Ben-Azu B, Aderibigbe AO, Omogbiya IA, et al. (2018) Morin pretreatment attenuates schizophrenia-like behaviors in experimental animal models. Drug Res (Stuttg) 68: 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-119127 ![]() |
[31] |
Kumar G, Patnaik R (2016) Exploring neuroprotective potential of Withania somnifera phytochemicals by inhibition of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors: An in silico study. Med Hypotheses 92: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2016.04.034 ![]() |
[32] |
Chen W, Qi J, Feng F, et al. (2014) Neuroprotective effect of allicin against traumatic brain injury via Akt/endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathwaymediated anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative activities. Neurochem Int 68: 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.01.015 ![]() |
[33] |
Zhu HT, Bian C, Yuan JC, et al. (2014) Curcumin attenuates acute inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 11: 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-11-59 ![]() |
[34] |
Krishnamurthy RG, Senut MC, Zemke D, et al. (2009) Asiatic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene from Centella asiatica, is neuroprotective in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci Res 87: 2541-2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22071 ![]() |
[35] |
Chandrasekaran K, Mehrabian Z, Spinnewyn B, et al. (2001) Neuroprotective effects of bilobalide, a component of the Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761), in gerbil global brain ischemia. Brain Res 922: 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03188-2 ![]() |
[36] |
Zhao J, Kobori N, Aronowski J, et al. (2006) Sulforaphane reduces infarct volume following focal cerebral ischemia in rodents. Neurosci Lett 393: 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.065 ![]() |
[37] |
Lakstygal AM, Kolesnikova TO, Khatsko SL, et al. (2019) DARK classics in chemical neuroscience: Atropine, scopolamine, and other anticholinergic deliriant hallucinogens. ACS Chem Neurosci 10: 2144-2159. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00615 ![]() |
[38] |
Huang SS, Tsai MC, Chih CL, et al. (2001) Resveratrol reduction of infarct size in Long-Evans rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia. Life Sci 69: 1057-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01195-X ![]() |
[39] |
Leiderman E, Zylberman I, Zukin SR, et al. (1996) Preliminary investigation of high-dose oral glycine on serum levels and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An open-label trial. Biol Psychiatry 39: 213-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(95)00585-4 ![]() |
[40] |
Hannan MA, Rahman MA, Sohag AAM, et al. (2021) Black cumin (Nigella sativa L.): A comprehensive review on phytochemistry, health benefits, molecular pharmacology, and safety. Nutrients 13: 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061784 ![]() |
[41] |
Yadav M, Jindal DK, Dhingra MS, et al. (2018) Protective effect of gallic acid in experimental model of ketamine-induced psychosis: Possible behaviour, biochemical, neurochemical and cellular alterations. Inflammopharmacology 26: 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-017-0366-8 ![]() |
[42] |
Mukherjee PK, Kumar V, Mal M, et al. (2007) In vitro acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the essential oil from Acorus calamus and its main constituents. Planta Med 73: 283-285. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-967114 ![]() |
[43] |
Azimi A, Ghaffari SM, Riazi GH, et al. (2016) α-Cyperone of Cyperus rotundus is an effective candidate for reduction of inflammation by destabilization of microtubule fibers in brain. J Ethnopharmacol 194: 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.058 ![]() |
[44] |
Alhebshi AH, Gotoh M, Suzuki I (2013) Thymoquinone protects cultured rat primary neurons against amyloid β-induced neurotoxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 433: 362-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.139 ![]() |
[45] |
Fuentes RG, Arai MA, Sadhu SK, et al. (2015) Phenolic compounds from the bark of Oroxylum indicum activate the Ngn2 promoter. J Nat Med 69: 589-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-015-0919-3 ![]() |
[46] | Rayan NA, Baby N, Pitchai D (2011) Costunolide inhibits proinflammatory cytokines and iNOS in activated murine BV2 microglia. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 3: 1079-1091. https://doi.org/10.2741/e312 |
[47] |
Khanra R, Dewanjee S, Dua TK, et al. (2015) Abroma augusta L. (Malvaceae) leaf extract attenuates diabetes induced nephropathy and cardiomyopathy via inhibition of oxidative stress and inflammatory response. J Transl Med 13: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-014-0364-1 ![]() |
[48] |
Gray NE, Magana AA, Lak P, et al. (2018) Centella asiatica: Phytochemistry and mechanisms of neuroprotection and cognitive enhancement. Phytochem Rev 17: 161-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-017-9528-y ![]() |
[49] | Sarkar T, Salauddin M, Chakraborty R (2020) In-depth pharmacological and nutritional properties of bael (Aegle marmelos): A critical review. J Agric Food Res 2: 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100081 |
[50] |
Okugawa H, Ueda R, Matsumoto K, et al. (1995) Effect of α-santalol and β-santalol from sandalwood on the central nervous system in mice. Phytomedicine 2: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-7113(11)80056-5 ![]() |
[51] | BIOVIA Discovery Studio. Available from: https://www.3ds.com/products/biovia/discovery-studio |
[52] |
Judd LL, Akiskal HS (2003) The prevalence and disability of bipolar spectrum disorders in the US population: Re-analysis of the ECA database taking into account subthreshold cases. J Affect Disord 73: 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00332-4 ![]() |
[53] |
Osby U, Brandt L, Correia N, et al. (2001) Excess mortality in bipolar and unipolar disorder in Sweden. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58: 844-850. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.9.844 ![]() |
[54] |
Taguchi YH, Wang H (2018) Exploring microRNA biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 19: 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051318 ![]() |
[55] |
Fame RM, MacDonald JL, Dunwoodie SL, et al. (2016) Cited2 regulates neocortical layer II/III generation and somatosensory callosal projection neuron development and connectivity. J Neurosci 36: 6403-6419. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4067-15.2016 ![]() |
[56] |
Yang C, Zhang K, Zhang A, et al. (2022) Co-expression network modeling identifies specific inflammation and neurological disease-related genes mRNA modules in mood disorder. Front Genet 13: 865015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.865015 ![]() |
[57] |
Ng PH, Kim GD, Chan ER, et al. (2020) CITED2 limits pathogenic inflammatory gene programs in myeloid cells. FASEB J 34: 12100-12113. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000864R ![]() |
[58] |
Adnan G, Rubikaite A, Khan M, et al. (2020) The GTPase Arl8B plays a principle role in the positioning of interstitial axon branches by spatially controlling autophagosome and lysosome location. J Neurosci 40: 8103-8118. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1759-19.2020 ![]() |
[59] |
Bagshaw RD, Callahan JW, Mahuran DJ (2006) The Arf-family protein, Arl8b, is involved in the spatial distribution of lysosomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 344: 1186-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.221 ![]() |
[60] |
Boeddrich A, Haenig C, Neuendorf N, et al. (2023) A proteomics analysis of 5xFAD mouse brain regions reveals the lysosome-associated protein Arl8b as a candidate biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. Genome Med 15: 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-023-01206-2 ![]() |
[61] | NUDT4 nudix hydrolase 4 [Homo sapiens (human)] (2024). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/11163#summary |
[62] |
Hua LV, Green M, Warsh JJ, et al. (2001) Molecular cloning of a novel isoform of diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase: A potential target of lithium therapy. Neuropsychopharmacology 24: 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00233-5 ![]() |
[63] |
Ding L, Liu T, Ma J (2023) Neuroprotective mechanisms of Asiatic acid. Heliyon 9: e15853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15853 ![]() |
[64] |
Zheng CJ, Qin LP (2007) Chemical components of Centella asiatica and their bioactivities. J Chin Integr Med 5: 348-351. ![]() |
[65] |
Rao KGM, Rao SM, Rao SG (2006) Centella asiatica (L.) leaf extract treatment during the growth spurt period enhances hippocampal CA3 neuronal dendritic arborization in rats. Evid-Based Complement Alternat Med 3: 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nel024 ![]() |
[66] |
Subathra M, Shila S, Devi MA, et al. (2005) Emerging role of Centella asiatica in improving age-related neurological antioxidant status. Exp Gerontol 40: 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2005.06.001 ![]() |
[67] |
Lu CW, Lin TY, Pan TL, et al. (2021) Asiatic acid prevents cognitive deficits by inhibiting calpain activation and preserving synaptic and mitochondrial function in rats with kainic acid-induced seizure. Biomedicines 9: 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9030284 ![]() |
[68] |
Kato T, Kato N (2000) Mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2: 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5618.2000.020305.x ![]() |
[69] |
Ding H, Xiong Y, Sun J, et al. (2018) Asiatic acid prevents oxidative stress and apoptosis by inhibiting the translocation of α-synuclein into mitochondria. Front Neurosci 12: 431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00431 ![]() |
[70] |
Krishnamurthy RG, Senut MC, Zemke D, et al. (2009) Asiatic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene from Centella asiatica, is neuroprotective in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci Res 87: 2541-2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22071 ![]() |
1. | Harshita Maheshwari, Prekshi Garg, Prachi Srivastava, In silico analysis predicts mutational consequences of CITED2, NUDT4, and Ar18B in patients with bipolar disorder, 2025, 476, 01664328, 115257, 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115257 |
Accession ID | Control Samples | Patient Samples | Tissue type | Age | Gender | Postpartum interval (PMI) |
GSE80336 [24] | 2 | 1 | Dorsal striatum | Control: 47,55 Patient: 51 |
Female | 21.66–35.08 |
GSE112523 [25] | 12 | 5 | Frontal cortex of human brain | Control: 40–54 Patient: 40–55 |
4 Female; 13 Male | 9.5–28.3 |
GSE78936 [26] | 12 | 16 | Brain | Control: 41.8 (Average) Patient: 47.7 (Average) |
11 Female; 17 Male | 30.2–41.9 (Average) |
S. No. | Variant ID | Type of variant | Clinical significance |
CITED2 | |||
1 | nsv3877040 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
2 | nsv3879811 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3887898 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3889814 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv39199111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3919111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3915150 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3904441 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv6112726 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv4675250 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3911993 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
14 | nsv6314818 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv4350212 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3911164 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3916499 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
18 | nsv3891146 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
19 | rs1583066622 | Single nucleotide variant | Likely-Pathogenic |
20 | rs531316452 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
21 | rs779637348 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
1 | nsv4436544 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic |
2 | nsv6112759 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3885606 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3880617 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv3876280 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3878718 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3879068 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3885461 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3887038 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3887514 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv3889023 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv3889705 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3895550 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
14 | nsv4674715 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv6313525 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3873053 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3875223 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
NUDT4 | |||
nsv3904242 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3905447 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3897722 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3914194 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3904719 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv4456763 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3911770 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic | |
nsv3924338 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
S. No. | Compound | Source | Toxicity class | Dosage (mg/kg) | Ref. |
1 | Arecholine | Arecha catechu (supari in India) | 4 | 550 | [27] |
2 | Leucine | Curcubita pepo (pumpkin) | 6 | 10000 | [28] |
3 | Betaine | Beta vulgaris (beetroot) | 4 | 650 | [29] |
4 | Morin | Alliuma cepa (onion) | 5 | 3915 | [30] |
5 | Anaferine | Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) | 4 | 338 | [31] |
6 | Allicin | Allium sativum (Garlic) | 4 | 874 | [32] |
7 | Curcumin | Curcuma longa (Turmeric) | 4 | 2000 | [33] |
8 | Asiatic acid | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 2000 | [34] |
9 | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | Ginko bibloba | 4 | 500 | [35] |
10 | Sulphoraphanes | All cruciferous plants | 4 | 1000 | [36] |
11 | Atrpohine Hyoscyamine | Datura | 4 | 380 | [37] |
12 | Resveratrol | Red grapes | 4 | 1560 | [38] |
13 | Glycine | Glycine max (soybean) | 5 | 3340 | [39] |
14 | Luteolin | Salvia osmarinus (rosemary) | 5 | 3919 | [40] |
15 | Gallic acid | Camellia sinensis (tea plant) | 4 | 2000 | [41] |
16 | β-asarone | Acorus calamus (Sweet flag) | 4 | 418 | [42] |
17 | α-Cyperone | Cyperus rotundus (Nut grass) | 4 | 1720 | [43] |
18 | Thymoquinone | Nigella sativa (Kalonji) | 5 | 2400 | [44] |
19 | Apegenin | Oroxylum indicum | 5 | 2500 | [45] |
20 | Costunolide | Costus speciosus (pushkarmula) | 5 | 3140 | [46] |
21 | Triterpenoids | Abroma augusta | 4 | 664 | [47] |
22 | Eugenol | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 1390 | [48] |
23 | Scopoletin | Aegle marmelos (bael) | 5 | 3800 | [49] |
24 | α-santalol | Santalum album (Sandalwood) | 5 | 3800 | [50] |
S. No. | Ligand name | CITED2 target binding energy (kcal/mol) | ARL8B target binding energy (kcal/mol) | NUDT4 target binding energy (kcal/mol) |
1. | α-cyperone | −6.79 | −5.55 | −5.98 |
2. | α-santalol | −5.95 | −5.33 | −4.67 |
3. | Allicin | −3.75 | −3.86 | −3.66 |
4. | Anaferine | −4.41 | −7.42 | −6.42 |
5. | Apigenin | −4.48 | −5.51 | −5.92 |
6. | Arecholine | −4.83 | −5.90 | −5.02 |
7. | Asiatic acid | −7.10 | −6.96 | −9.22 |
8. | β-asarone | −6.28 | −4.46 | −4.86 |
9. | Betaine | −3.64 | −4.19 | −3.14 |
10. | Costunolide | −7.76 | −7.09 | −6.63 |
11. | Curcumin | −3.72 | −5.19 | −4.66 |
12. | Eugenol | −3.91 | −4.39 | −4.47 |
13. | Gallic acid | −5.32 | −6.25 | −5.66 |
14. | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | −5.92 | −7.91 | −6.42 |
15. | Glycine | −4.95 | −4.14 | −4.27 |
16. | Atropine | −4.91 | −7.06 | −6.56 |
17. | Leucine | −3.47 | −5.05 | −3.78 |
18. | Luteolin | −6.27 | −5.93 | −5.85 |
19. | Morin | −6.60 | −5.35 | −4.82 |
20. | Resveratrol | −5.45 | −6.25 | −5.02 |
21. | Scopoletin | −5.44 | −5.41 | −5.23 |
22. | Sulphoraphanes | −3.75 | −4.60 | −4.47 |
23. | Thymoquinone | −5.40 | −5.29 | −4.97 |
24. | Triterpenoids | −7.02 | −7.23 | −7.39 |
Accession ID | Control Samples | Patient Samples | Tissue type | Age | Gender | Postpartum interval (PMI) |
GSE80336 [24] | 2 | 1 | Dorsal striatum | Control: 47,55 Patient: 51 |
Female | 21.66–35.08 |
GSE112523 [25] | 12 | 5 | Frontal cortex of human brain | Control: 40–54 Patient: 40–55 |
4 Female; 13 Male | 9.5–28.3 |
GSE78936 [26] | 12 | 16 | Brain | Control: 41.8 (Average) Patient: 47.7 (Average) |
11 Female; 17 Male | 30.2–41.9 (Average) |
S. No. | Variant ID | Type of variant | Clinical significance |
CITED2 | |||
1 | nsv3877040 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
2 | nsv3879811 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3887898 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3889814 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv39199111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3919111 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3913689 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3915150 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3904441 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv6112726 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv4675250 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3911993 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
14 | nsv6314818 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv4350212 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3911164 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3916499 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
18 | nsv3891146 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
19 | rs1583066622 | Single nucleotide variant | Likely-Pathogenic |
20 | rs531316452 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
21 | rs779637348 | Insertion-deletion | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
1 | nsv4436544 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic |
2 | nsv6112759 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
3 | nsv3885606 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
4 | nsv3880617 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
5 | nsv3876280 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
6 | nsv3878718 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
7 | nsv3879068 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
8 | nsv3885461 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
9 | nsv3887038 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
10 | nsv3887514 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
11 | nsv3889023 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
12 | nsv3889705 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
13 | nsv3895550 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
ARL8b | |||
14 | nsv4674715 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
15 | nsv6313525 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
16 | nsv3873053 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
17 | nsv3875223 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
NUDT4 | |||
nsv3904242 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3905447 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3897722 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3914194 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3904719 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv4456763 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic | |
nsv3911770 | Copy number variation | Likely-Pathogenic | |
nsv3924338 | Copy number variation | Pathogenic |
S. No. | Compound | Source | Toxicity class | Dosage (mg/kg) | Ref. |
1 | Arecholine | Arecha catechu (supari in India) | 4 | 550 | [27] |
2 | Leucine | Curcubita pepo (pumpkin) | 6 | 10000 | [28] |
3 | Betaine | Beta vulgaris (beetroot) | 4 | 650 | [29] |
4 | Morin | Alliuma cepa (onion) | 5 | 3915 | [30] |
5 | Anaferine | Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) | 4 | 338 | [31] |
6 | Allicin | Allium sativum (Garlic) | 4 | 874 | [32] |
7 | Curcumin | Curcuma longa (Turmeric) | 4 | 2000 | [33] |
8 | Asiatic acid | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 2000 | [34] |
9 | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | Ginko bibloba | 4 | 500 | [35] |
10 | Sulphoraphanes | All cruciferous plants | 4 | 1000 | [36] |
11 | Atrpohine Hyoscyamine | Datura | 4 | 380 | [37] |
12 | Resveratrol | Red grapes | 4 | 1560 | [38] |
13 | Glycine | Glycine max (soybean) | 5 | 3340 | [39] |
14 | Luteolin | Salvia osmarinus (rosemary) | 5 | 3919 | [40] |
15 | Gallic acid | Camellia sinensis (tea plant) | 4 | 2000 | [41] |
16 | β-asarone | Acorus calamus (Sweet flag) | 4 | 418 | [42] |
17 | α-Cyperone | Cyperus rotundus (Nut grass) | 4 | 1720 | [43] |
18 | Thymoquinone | Nigella sativa (Kalonji) | 5 | 2400 | [44] |
19 | Apegenin | Oroxylum indicum | 5 | 2500 | [45] |
20 | Costunolide | Costus speciosus (pushkarmula) | 5 | 3140 | [46] |
21 | Triterpenoids | Abroma augusta | 4 | 664 | [47] |
22 | Eugenol | Centella asiatica (gotu kola) | 4 | 1390 | [48] |
23 | Scopoletin | Aegle marmelos (bael) | 5 | 3800 | [49] |
24 | α-santalol | Santalum album (Sandalwood) | 5 | 3800 | [50] |
S. No. | Ligand name | CITED2 target binding energy (kcal/mol) | ARL8B target binding energy (kcal/mol) | NUDT4 target binding energy (kcal/mol) |
1. | α-cyperone | −6.79 | −5.55 | −5.98 |
2. | α-santalol | −5.95 | −5.33 | −4.67 |
3. | Allicin | −3.75 | −3.86 | −3.66 |
4. | Anaferine | −4.41 | −7.42 | −6.42 |
5. | Apigenin | −4.48 | −5.51 | −5.92 |
6. | Arecholine | −4.83 | −5.90 | −5.02 |
7. | Asiatic acid | −7.10 | −6.96 | −9.22 |
8. | β-asarone | −6.28 | −4.46 | −4.86 |
9. | Betaine | −3.64 | −4.19 | −3.14 |
10. | Costunolide | −7.76 | −7.09 | −6.63 |
11. | Curcumin | −3.72 | −5.19 | −4.66 |
12. | Eugenol | −3.91 | −4.39 | −4.47 |
13. | Gallic acid | −5.32 | −6.25 | −5.66 |
14. | Ginkgolides A, B, C, J and M | −5.92 | −7.91 | −6.42 |
15. | Glycine | −4.95 | −4.14 | −4.27 |
16. | Atropine | −4.91 | −7.06 | −6.56 |
17. | Leucine | −3.47 | −5.05 | −3.78 |
18. | Luteolin | −6.27 | −5.93 | −5.85 |
19. | Morin | −6.60 | −5.35 | −4.82 |
20. | Resveratrol | −5.45 | −6.25 | −5.02 |
21. | Scopoletin | −5.44 | −5.41 | −5.23 |
22. | Sulphoraphanes | −3.75 | −4.60 | −4.47 |
23. | Thymoquinone | −5.40 | −5.29 | −4.97 |
24. | Triterpenoids | −7.02 | −7.23 | −7.39 |