
Hydrocephalus is a neurodevelopmental, X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations in the L1CAM gene. The L1CAM gene encodes for L1CAM protein which is essential for the nervous system development including adhesion between neurons, Myelination, Synaptogenesis etc. Herein, the present study has reported mutations in L1 syndrome patient with Hydrocephalus and Adducted thumb. Genomic DNA was extracted from patients whole blood (n = 18). The 11 exons of the L1CAM gene were amplified using specific PCR primers. The sequenced data was analysed and the pathogenicity of the mutation was predicted using the various bioinformatics programs: PROVEAN, PolyPhen2, and MUpro. The results revealed that the proband described here had nonsense mutation G1120→T at position 1120 in exon 9 which is in extracellular immunoglobulin domain (Ig4) of the L1CAM gene. This nonsense mutation is found to be truncated with a deleterious effect on developing brain of the child, and this is the first report of this novel mutation in patient with X-linked Hydrocephalus in India.
Citation: Madhan Srinivasamurthy, Nagaraj Kakanahalli, Shreeshail V. Benakanal. A truncation mutation in the L1CAM gene in a child with hydrocephalus[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(4): 223-232. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021017
[1] | Mohammad Shboul, Hela Sassi, Houweyda Jilani, Imen Rejeb, Yasmina Elaribi, Syrine Hizem, Lamia Ben Jemaa, Marwa Hilmi, Susanna Gerit Kircher, Ali Al Kaissi . The phenotypic spectrum in a patient with Glycine to Serine mutation in the COL2A1 gene: overview study. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 76-85. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021006 |
[2] | Yutaka Takihara, Ryuji Otani, Takuro Ishii, Shunsuke Takaoka, Yuki Nakano, Kaori Inoue, Steven Larsen, Yoko Ogino, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma, Fumiaki Uchiumi . Characterization of the human IDH1 gene promoter. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023013 |
[3] | Jin Hwan Do . Genome-wide transcriptional comparison of MPP+ treated human neuroblastoma cells with the state space model. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 440-460. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.440 |
[4] | Anna Kapambwe Bwalya, Robinson Mugasiali Irekwa, Amos Mbugua, Matthew Mutinda Munyao, Peter Kipkemboi Rotich, Tonny Teya Nyandwaro, Caroline Wangui Njoroge, Anne Wanjiru Mwangi, Joanne Jepkemei Yego, Shahiid Kiyaga, Samson Muuo Nzou . Investigation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in MRPA and AQP-1 genes of Leishmania donovani as resistance markers in visceral leishmaniasis in Kenya. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(2): 149-160. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021011 |
[5] | Kui Wang, Zhifang Yang, Xiaohui Chen, Shunxiao Liu, Xiang Li, Liuhao Wang, Hao Yu, Hongwei Zhang . Characterization and analysis of myosin gene family in the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). AIMS Molecular Science, 2022, 9(2): 91-106. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022006 |
[6] | Nesrin R. Mwafi, Dema A. Ali, Raida W. Khalil, Ibrahim N. Alsbou', Ahmad M. Saraireh . Novel R225C variant identified in the HGD gene in Jordanian patients with alkaptonuria. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 60-75. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021005 |
[7] | Seyedeh Fahimeh Razavi, Leila Zarandi Miandoab, Elaheh Zadeh Hosseingholi, Nader Chaparzadeh . Radical scavenging capacity of RuBisCO bioactive peptides derived from Dunaliella salina and Spirulina platensis: An in silico and in vitro study. AIMS Molecular Science, 2025, 12(1): 49-66. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2025004 |
[8] | Jean Emmanuel Mbosso Teinkela, Philippe Belle Ebanda Kedi, Jean Baptiste Hzounda Fokou, Michelle Isaacs, Lisette Pulchérie Yoyo Ngando, Gaelle Wea Tchepnou, Hassan Oumarou, Xavier Siwe Noundou . In vitro anti-trypanosomal activity of crude extract and fractions of Trichoscypha acuminata stem bark, Spathodea campanulata flowers, and Ficus elastica lianas on Trypanosoma brucei brucei. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(1): 63-71. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024005 |
[9] | Praveen Kumar Neela, Rajeshwari B.V, Mahamad Irfanulla Khan, Shahistha Parveen Dasnadi, Gosla Srinivas Reddy, Akhter Husain, Vasavi Mohan . Genetic influences on non-syndromic cleft lip palate: The impact of BMP4, RUNX2, PAX7, and TGFB3 allelic variations. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(4): 322-329. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024019 |
[10] | Sarmishta Mukhopadhyay, Sayak Ganguli, Santanu Chakrabarti . Shigella pathogenesis: molecular and computational insights. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(2): 99-121. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020007 |
Hydrocephalus is a neurodevelopmental, X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations in the L1CAM gene. The L1CAM gene encodes for L1CAM protein which is essential for the nervous system development including adhesion between neurons, Myelination, Synaptogenesis etc. Herein, the present study has reported mutations in L1 syndrome patient with Hydrocephalus and Adducted thumb. Genomic DNA was extracted from patients whole blood (n = 18). The 11 exons of the L1CAM gene were amplified using specific PCR primers. The sequenced data was analysed and the pathogenicity of the mutation was predicted using the various bioinformatics programs: PROVEAN, PolyPhen2, and MUpro. The results revealed that the proband described here had nonsense mutation G1120→T at position 1120 in exon 9 which is in extracellular immunoglobulin domain (Ig4) of the L1CAM gene. This nonsense mutation is found to be truncated with a deleterious effect on developing brain of the child, and this is the first report of this novel mutation in patient with X-linked Hydrocephalus in India.
X-linked hydrocephalus (XLH) is the most common form of inherited hydrocephalus and is associated with severe neurological deficits and premature death [1] affecting about 1 in 25,000 live births [2]. X-linked hydrocephalus is a clinical subtype of L1 syndrome and this subtype represents the severe end of the L1 syndrome spectrum [3]. The most common phenotypes of L1 syndrome condition are mental retardation, aphasia, and adducted thumb [2]. In severe condition the L1 syndrome patients presented with additional clinical features including hydrocephalus, shuffling gait, spastic paraplegia and hirschsprung's disease in very rare cases [3],[9].
X-linked hydrocephalus is a result of defect in L1CAM protein which is involved in diverse processes at different stages during development of the nervous system, including cell-cell adhesion, neurite growth, neural migration, axonal fasciculation, myelination, and synaptic plasticity [4]–[6]. The L1CAM gene encoding L1CAM protein is located on the X chromosome at q28 position and it is expressed predominantly in neural cells [7]. The L1CAM gene is 24,657 bp in length, consisting of 28 exons (NM_000425.5) encode for 1,257 amino acids [8].
L1 syndrome patients are evidenced with wide varieties of mutations in the L1CAM gene [10], and all of them have been listed in L1CAM mutation database [11]. Many recent studies have reported several truncated mutations in L1 syndrome condition [12]–[15] and most of them are private mutations specific to individual family [8],[16]–[18]. The present study aimed to investigate pathogenic variants in a child diagnosed with hydrocephalus. Herein, a novel mutation in exon 9 of L1CAM gene is reported and it has not been listed yet in the L1CAM mutation database. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting the novel mutation in Indian cohorts [18],[19].
The proband was diagnosed for hydrocephalus in neonatal condition. He had a bilateral adducted thumb along with the birth weight of 3,200 g (Figure 1). His neurosonographic findings showed obstructive hydrocephalus with dilation of lateral ventricles and third ventricle suggestive of Aqueductal stenosis (Figure 2). His developmental milestones were delayed because of the hydrocephalus and at the age of 10 months the proband was severely affected both mentally and physically. The proband belongs to the family with consanguineous parents and the family has history of having an affected male in the previous generation. The proband had a healthy female sibling.
The present case was referred by Paediatric neurologists, Department of Paediatrics, SIMS-Shivamogga Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India. The proband was the second child of healthy, consanguineous parents. After birth, bilateral adducted thumbs, and flexion contractures of the fingers were noted. His typical L1 syndrome features prompted us to screen the mutations in the L1CAM gene. The family history was positive for neurological abnormalities like Mental retardation and spasticity (II:5 in Figure 3).
A standard questionnaire was used to collect the family history of the patients along with the clinical parameters related to the L1 syndrome and patient consent was also obtained by the family. The affected members of the family and the parents were clinically examined and information of age, sex, physical features, pedigree, health status, intelligence quotient, etc., was recorded. Blood sample of the patient was collected by venipuncture of the patient arm to a K3-EDTA tube and stored at 4°C until further analysis.
Genomic DNA was isolated from the whole blood using Qiagen Human blood DNA isolation kit [20]. Isolated DNA was quantified by Bio spectrophotometer.
DNA was amplified by Polymerase chain reaction using primers designed on different exon and intron regions of the L1CAM gene (Table 1). Primers were designed on the L1CAM GenBank sequence (Accession num: NM_000425.5) by using NCBI Primer-Blast [21] (Table 1).
Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Exon/Intron | Amplicon size (bp) |
F14 R14 |
5′ATGCAGACACATACGGGGA3′ 5′AGTCAGGGTCCGGAACAG3′ |
Exon 1 | 623 |
F9 R9 |
5′CTGCCTAGCACCATCTGGAC3′ 5′GAGGGACTCGACACTCCA3′ |
Exon 5,6 | 672 |
F10 R10 |
5′TGGAGTGTCGAGTCCCTCA3′ 5′ATTGAGCTGCGTTGAGGC3′ |
Exon 7–9 | 877 |
F11 R11 |
5′ATGCGTACTATGTCACCG3′ 5′ATTCCAGGCCTAACTGACAG3′ |
Exon 9,10 | 905 |
F12 R12 |
5′TGGCAGCTGATGTGTCCTCG3′ 5′GCATAGGGGAAGAAGCGTTCG3′ |
Exon 11 | 765 |
F13 R13 |
5′ATGACCTGGGTGTCTGTTGC3′ 5′GAAAGGCGCACACCAATGC3′ |
Exon 18 | 458 |
F1 R1 |
5′ATGAGACCTTCGGCGAGTACAG3′ 5′GTGTTGGCCTCTCCCTGAAATGA3′ |
Exon 26 to intron 27 | 289 |
The PCR reaction contains 200 ng of genomic DNA, 10 µM of each primer and PCR master mix (TAKARA) and the final reaction volume was set to 25 µl. PCR amplification was carried out for 35 cycles, each cycle consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 10 seconds, annealing at 57°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. Initial denaturation was carried out at 94°C for 5 minutes and the final extension was carried out at 72°C for 5 minutes. The amplified DNA product was confirmed on 2% agarose gel, with a 100 bp DNA ladder.
The PCR amplified product was sequenced using Applied Biosystems genetic analysis systems series 3500 at Eurofins Analytical Services India Private Limited, Bengaluru. The sequencing was employed in both forward and reverse directions of each template and the sequence data was analysed by using the “BioEdit” tool [22].
The pedigree of the family is presented in Figure 3, and it is revealed that the affected boy born to consanguineous parents (II:3 Father and II:4 Mother). According to family history, an individual (pedigree II 5) who was a maternal uncle of the proband was found to have suffered from mental retardation and walking disability and died at the age of 12 years.
PCR amplification was performed using the DNA of the proband with the primer sets F10 & R10 designed specific to region between exon 7 to 9 (Table 1). The primer pairs were designed using the genomic sequence for L1CAM (NM_000425.5) and the PCR product of 877 bp was obtained (Figure 4).
The sequencing result of the participated members has revealed that the father II:3 have wild type variant (Figure 5A), whereas the mother II:4 was a carrier with a mutated variant (Figure 5B). Mutation analysis revealed that III:1 has inherited the mutated variant from his carrier mother denoted as G1120→T (Figure 5C). The G1120→T is a transversion of G (Guanine) to T (Thymine) at position 1120 which results a STOP codon in the exon 9 of the L1CAM gene. This nonsense variant yielded truncated L1 protein (E374X) at Immunoglobulin four domain (Ig4) in the extracellular portion (Figure 6). This nonsense variant (G1120→T) was not found in any control individuals and was identified to be deleterious as shown by PROVEAN (−3.192), probably damaging shown by PolyPhen2 (0.999) and decrease stability shown by MUpro (0.971).
The X-linked hydrocephalus is one of the major disorders among spectrum of L1 syndrome conditions including mental retardation, aphasia, spasticity, and adducted thumbs and shows an X-linked recessive mode of inheritance [3],[23]. Many studies have revealed a correlation between the numbers of clinical characteristics, the number of affected family members and the chance of finding mutation. And also reported that there is a genotype-phenotype correlation between the severity of the disease and the type of L1CAM variant [2],[3],[24].
L1CAM is the transmembrane glycoprotein with six Ig-like domains followed by five fibronectin type III domains, a single-pass transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic domain (Figure 6). The heterogeneity in phenotype and variety of L1CAM mutations are characteristics of the L1 syndrome. L1CAM mutations are classified into 4 distinct classes: Class I includes mutations in the extracellular region of L1 protein lead to truncation or absence of the protein. Class II includes missense mutations resulting in an amino acid substitution in the extracellular region of L1. Class III includes mutations in the cytoplasmic domain. Class IV comprising extracellular mutations resulting in aberrant splicing of pre mRNA [24],[25]. Because of the class I mutations the L1 protein would not remain integrated into the cell membrane and therefore loss of all normal functions. This leads to development of severe phenotypes like Agenesis of the corpus callosum, adducted thumbs, spastic paraplegia and aphasia. The Yamasaki et al. [25], and Fransen et al. [24], pointed out a striking correlation between the mutation class and severity of the phenotypes.
The proband included in this study was belonged to a family with one affected male in generation II of the pedigree (Figure 3), the II-5 is a maternal uncle presented with mental retardation and walking disability, which are typical features of the L1 syndrome.
Patient carried a mutation showing G→T transversion at position 1120 (G1120→T) of exon 9 of the L1CAM gene (Figure 5C) creating stop codon. Exon 9 encodes the fourth immunoglobulin domain (Ig4) and this nonsense mutation led to a change of glutamic acid to STOP codon (GAG→TAG) in position 374 (E374X) in the extracellular portion (Figure 6). This mutation has truncated the L1 protein because of the stop codon, leading to the disruption in the interaction between L1 molecules, and resulted in abnormal development of the brain. Previous studies have suggested that the mutations in this region manifest with variable clinical symptoms from Hydrocephalus to MASA syndrome [2],[10],[26],[27]. The function of the glutamic acid is to activate the protein or binding sites and it acts as an important neurotransmitter, and very important for brain development [28]. Based on the classifications suggested by Yamasaki et al. [25], and Fransen et al. [24], this extracellular truncated mutation E374X represents class I mutations.
The present investigation has resulted in the identification of a novel nonsense pathogenic variant E374X in L1CAM gene in a proband belonging to a family presented with consanguineous marriage. The proband's mother clearly shows the heterogeneity of the pathogenic variant G1120→T. This novel nonsense mutation has truncated the L1CAM protein at extracellular portion at Ig4 domain. Since the identification of L1 syndrome patients and L1CAM mutations in Indian cohorts is very less, the testing for carrier status and prenatal molecular diagnosis for high-risk pregnancies are recommended to prevent the recurrence of the identified pathogenic variants. Identification of the novel mutations in the L1CAM gene helps to understand the pathogenesis of the L1 syndrome.
[1] |
Bickers D, Adams R (1949) Hereditary stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius as a cause of congenital hydrocephalus. Brain 72: 246-262. doi: 10.1093/brain/72.2.246
![]() |
[2] |
Finckh U, Schroder J, Ressler B, et al. (2000) Spectrum and detection rate of L1CAM mutations in isolated and familial cases with clinically suspected L1-disease. Am J Med Genet 92: 40-46. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000501)92:1<40::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO;2-R
![]() |
[3] |
Fransen E, Camp GV, Vits L, et al. (1997) L1-associated diseases: clinical genetics divide, molecular genetics unite. Hum Mol Genet 6: 1625-1632. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1625
![]() |
[4] |
Samatov TR, Wicklein D, Tonevitsky AG (2016) L1CAM: Cell adhesion and more. Prog Histochem Cytochem 51: 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.proghi.2016.05.001
![]() |
[5] |
Kamiguchi H, Hlavin ML, Lemmon V (1998) Role of L1 in Neural Development: What the Knockouts Tell Us. Mol Cell Neurosci 12: 48-55. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1998.0702
![]() |
[6] |
Moos M, Tacke R, Scherer H, et al. (1988) Neural Adhesion Molecule L1 as a Member of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily with Binding Domains Similar to Fibronectin. Nature 334: 701-703. doi: 10.1038/334701a0
![]() |
[7] |
Mikulak J, Negrini S, Klajn A, et al. (2012) Dual REST-dependence of L1CAM: from gene expression to alternative splicing governed by Nova2 in neural cells. J Neurochem 120: 699-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07626.x
![]() |
[8] | Bertolin C, Boaretto F, Barbon G, et al. (2010) Novel mutations in the L1CAM gene support the complexity of L1 syndrome. J Neurosci 294: 124-126. |
[9] |
Okamoto N, Del Maestro R, Valero R, et al. (2004) Hydrocephalus and Hirschsprung's disease with a mutation of L1CAM. J Hum Genet 49: 334-337. doi: 10.1007/s10038-004-0153-4
![]() |
[10] |
Vos YJ, De Walle HE, Bos KK, et al. (2010) Genotype-phenotype correlations in L1 syndrome: a guide for genetic counseling and mutation analysis. J Med Genet 47: 169-175. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.071688
![]() |
[11] | L1CAM mutation database Available from: http://www.l1cammutationdatabase.info/default.aspx. |
[12] |
Kanemura Y, Takuma Y, Kamiguchi H, et al. (2005) First case of L1CAM gene mutation identified in MASA syndrome in Asia. Congenital Anomalies 45: 67-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2005.00067.x
![]() |
[13] |
Marin R, Ley-Martos M, Gutierrez G, et al. (2015) Three cases with L1 syndrome and two novel mutations in the L1CAM gene. Eur J Pediatr 174: 1541-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2560-2
![]() |
[14] |
Ochando I, Vidal V, Gascon J, et al. (2015) Prenatal diagnosis of X-linked hydrocephalus in a family with a novel mutation in L1CAM gene. J Obstet Gynaecol 36: 403-405. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1086982
![]() |
[15] |
Silan F, Ozdemir I, Lissens W (2005) A novel L1CAM mutation with L1 spectrum disorders. Prenat Diagn 25: 57-59. doi: 10.1002/pd.978
![]() |
[16] |
Camp GV, Vits L, Coucke P, et al. (1993) A Duplication in the L1CAM Gene Associated with X-Linked Hydrocephalus. Nat Genet 4: 421-425. doi: 10.1038/ng0893-421
![]() |
[17] |
Fransen E, Lemmon V, Camp VG, et al. (1995) CRASH syndrome: clinical spectrum of corpus callosum hypoplasia, retardation, adducted thumbs, spastic paraparesis and hydrocephalus due to mutations in one single gene, L1. Eur J Hum Genet 3: 273-284. doi: 10.1159/000472311
![]() |
[18] |
Swarna M, Sujatha M, Usha Rani P, et al. (2004) Detection of L1 CAM mutation in a male child with Mental retardation. Indian J Clin Biochem 19: 163-167. doi: 10.1007/BF02894278
![]() |
[19] |
Jharna P, Hemabindu L, Siva Prasad S, et al. (2006) Detection of L1 (CAM) mutations in X-linked mental retardation: A study from Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Hum Genet 12: 82-85. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.27791
![]() |
[20] | QIAamp DNA Mini Blood Mini Handbook Available from: https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources/resourcedetail?id=62a200d6-faf4-469b-b50f-2b59cf738962&lang=en. |
[21] | NCBI Primer-Blast Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/. |
[22] | BioEdit tool Available from: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html. |
[23] |
Rosenthal A, Jouet M, Kenwrick S (1992) Aberrant splicing of neural cell adhesion molecule L1 mRNA in a family with X-linked hydrocephalus. Nat Genet 2: 107-112. doi: 10.1038/ng1092-107
![]() |
[24] |
Fransen E, Camp GV, Hooge RD, et al. (1998) Genotype-phenotype correlation in L1 associated diseases. J Med Genet 35: 399-404. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.5.399
![]() |
[25] |
Yamasaki M, Thompson P, Lemmon V (1997) CRASH syndrome: mutations in L1CAM correlate with severity of the disease. Neuropediatrics 28: 175-178. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973696
![]() |
[26] |
De Angelis E, Watkins A, Schafer M, et al. (2002) Disease-Associated Mutations in L1CAM Interfere with Ligand Interactions and Cell-Surface Expression. Hum Mol Genet 11: 1-12. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.1.1
![]() |
[27] |
Kaepernick L, Legius E, Higgins J, et al. (1994) Clinical aspects of the MASA syndrome in a large family, including expressing females. Clin Genet 45: 181-185. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1994.tb04019.x
![]() |
[28] | Betts MJ, Russell RB (2003) Amino acid properties and consequences of substitutions. Bioinf Genet 14: 289-316. |
1. | Arun Meyyazhagan, Haripriya Kuchi Bhotla, Manikantan Pappuswamy, Valentina Tsibizova, Karthick Kumar Alagamuthu, Gian Carlo Di Renzo, 2023, Chapter 4, 978-3-031-31757-6, 57, 10.1007/978-3-031-31758-3_4 |
Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Exon/Intron | Amplicon size (bp) |
F14 R14 |
5′ATGCAGACACATACGGGGA3′ 5′AGTCAGGGTCCGGAACAG3′ |
Exon 1 | 623 |
F9 R9 |
5′CTGCCTAGCACCATCTGGAC3′ 5′GAGGGACTCGACACTCCA3′ |
Exon 5,6 | 672 |
F10 R10 |
5′TGGAGTGTCGAGTCCCTCA3′ 5′ATTGAGCTGCGTTGAGGC3′ |
Exon 7–9 | 877 |
F11 R11 |
5′ATGCGTACTATGTCACCG3′ 5′ATTCCAGGCCTAACTGACAG3′ |
Exon 9,10 | 905 |
F12 R12 |
5′TGGCAGCTGATGTGTCCTCG3′ 5′GCATAGGGGAAGAAGCGTTCG3′ |
Exon 11 | 765 |
F13 R13 |
5′ATGACCTGGGTGTCTGTTGC3′ 5′GAAAGGCGCACACCAATGC3′ |
Exon 18 | 458 |
F1 R1 |
5′ATGAGACCTTCGGCGAGTACAG3′ 5′GTGTTGGCCTCTCCCTGAAATGA3′ |
Exon 26 to intron 27 | 289 |
Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Exon/Intron | Amplicon size (bp) |
F14 R14 |
5′ATGCAGACACATACGGGGA3′ 5′AGTCAGGGTCCGGAACAG3′ |
Exon 1 | 623 |
F9 R9 |
5′CTGCCTAGCACCATCTGGAC3′ 5′GAGGGACTCGACACTCCA3′ |
Exon 5,6 | 672 |
F10 R10 |
5′TGGAGTGTCGAGTCCCTCA3′ 5′ATTGAGCTGCGTTGAGGC3′ |
Exon 7–9 | 877 |
F11 R11 |
5′ATGCGTACTATGTCACCG3′ 5′ATTCCAGGCCTAACTGACAG3′ |
Exon 9,10 | 905 |
F12 R12 |
5′TGGCAGCTGATGTGTCCTCG3′ 5′GCATAGGGGAAGAAGCGTTCG3′ |
Exon 11 | 765 |
F13 R13 |
5′ATGACCTGGGTGTCTGTTGC3′ 5′GAAAGGCGCACACCAATGC3′ |
Exon 18 | 458 |
F1 R1 |
5′ATGAGACCTTCGGCGAGTACAG3′ 5′GTGTTGGCCTCTCCCTGAAATGA3′ |
Exon 26 to intron 27 | 289 |