
Delay differential equations (DDEs) are used to model some realistic systems as they provide some information about the past state of the systems in addition to the current state. These DDEs are used to analyze the long-time behavior of the system at both present and past state of such systems. Due to the oscillatory nature of DDEs their explicit solution is not possible and therefore one need to use some numerical approaches. In this article, we developed a higher-order numerical scheme for the approximate solution of higher-order functional differential equations of pantograph type with vanishing proportional delays. Some linear and functional transformations are used to change the given interval [0, T] into standard interval [-1, 1] in order to fully use the properties of orthogonal polynomials. It is assumed that the solution of the equation is smooth on the entire domain of interval of integration. The proposed scheme is employed to the equivalent integrated form of the given equation. A Legendre spectral collocation method relative to Gauss-Legendre quadrature formula is used to evaluate the integral term efficiently. A detail theoretical convergence analysis in L∞ norm is provided. Several numerical experiments were performed to confirm the theoretical results.
Citation: Ishtiaq Ali. Long time behavior of higher-order delay differential equation with vanishing proportional delay and its convergence analysis using spectral method[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4946-4959. doi: 10.3934/math.2022275
[1] | Chuanhua Wu, Ziqiang Wang . The spectral collocation method for solving a fractional integro-differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 9577-9587. doi: 10.3934/math.2022532 |
[2] | Mahmoud A. Zaky, Weam G. Alharbi, Marwa M. Alzubaidi, R.T. Matoog . A Legendre tau approach for high-order pantograph Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7067-7085. doi: 10.3934/math.2025322 |
[3] | Siqin Tang, Hong Li . A Legendre-tau-Galerkin method in time for two-dimensional Sobolev equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16073-16093. doi: 10.3934/math.2023820 |
[4] | A. K. Omran, V. G. Pimenov . High-order numerical algorithm for fractional-order nonlinear diffusion equations with a time delay effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7672-7694. doi: 10.3934/math.2023385 |
[5] | Hasanen A. Hammad, Hüseyin Işık, Manuel De la Sen . Existence and stability results for nonlinear coupled singular fractional-order differential equations with time delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15749-15772. doi: 10.3934/math.2023804 |
[6] | Hui-qing Liao, Ying Fu, He-ping Ma . A space-time spectral method for the 1-D Maxwell equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7649-7668. doi: 10.3934/math.2021444 |
[7] | Mehrnoosh Hedayati, Hojjat Ahsani Tehrani, Alireza Fakharzadeh Jahromi, Mohammad Hadi Noori Skandari, Dumitru Baleanu . A novel high accurate numerical approach for the time-delay optimal control problems with delay on both state and control variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 9789-9808. doi: 10.3934/math.2022545 |
[8] | Chang Phang, Abdulnasir Isah, Yoke Teng Toh . Poly-Genocchi polynomials and its applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8221-8238. doi: 10.3934/math.2021476 |
[9] | Tawatchai Petaratip, Piyapong Niamsup . Stability analysis of an unemployment model with time delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7421-7440. doi: 10.3934/math.2021434 |
[10] | A. H. Tedjani, A. Z. Amin, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, M. A. Abdelkawy, Mona Mahmoud . Legendre spectral collocation method for solving nonlinear fractional Fredholm integro-differential equations with convergence analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 7973-8000. doi: 10.3934/math.2024388 |
Delay differential equations (DDEs) are used to model some realistic systems as they provide some information about the past state of the systems in addition to the current state. These DDEs are used to analyze the long-time behavior of the system at both present and past state of such systems. Due to the oscillatory nature of DDEs their explicit solution is not possible and therefore one need to use some numerical approaches. In this article, we developed a higher-order numerical scheme for the approximate solution of higher-order functional differential equations of pantograph type with vanishing proportional delays. Some linear and functional transformations are used to change the given interval [0, T] into standard interval [-1, 1] in order to fully use the properties of orthogonal polynomials. It is assumed that the solution of the equation is smooth on the entire domain of interval of integration. The proposed scheme is employed to the equivalent integrated form of the given equation. A Legendre spectral collocation method relative to Gauss-Legendre quadrature formula is used to evaluate the integral term efficiently. A detail theoretical convergence analysis in L∞ norm is provided. Several numerical experiments were performed to confirm the theoretical results.
In nature there are so many physical phenomena where the state of the system not only depends on the current state but also depends on the history of the function. In this case it is more natural to model such type of phenomena using the delay differential equations (DDEs), where the state of the function depends on the current state as well as on the history of the function. Among the many available delay differential system, pantograph type delay differential equation is more commonly used in mathematical modeling of chemical and pharmaceutical kinetics, control problems and ships aircraft where they are used in navigational control electronic systems. It is called pantograph type equation because it was first used to investigate that how an electric current is obtained by the electric locomotive of a pantograph. Consider the kth-order functional differential equation of pantograph type of the form:
y(k)(x)=∑k−1l=0λl(x)y(l)(x)+∑k−1l=0μl(x)y(l)(αlx)+g(x),x∈[0,T] | (1) |
subject to
y(m)(0)=y(m)0,(m=0,1,...,k−1). | (2) |
For k≥2, spectral method will be based on the integrated form of given equation. The functions λl(x) and μl(x) are given analytical functions on I:=[0,T] and αl∈(0,1),l=0,1 is a fixed constant known as proportional delay. For simplicity, we employed and analyzed spectral method for the second order functional differential equation, that is k=2. Eq (1) will take the form:
y''(x)=∑1l=0λl(x)y(l)(x)+∑1l=0μl(x)y(l)(αlx)+g(x),x∈[0,T] | (3) |
subject to
y(0)=y0,y′(0)=y1. | (4) |
Equation (3) plays an important role in modeling of many physical phenomena like, for example in electrodynamics and in nonlinear dynamical systems. In practice it is arises in the problems when λl(x) and μl(x) are real constant and αl(x) is real valued function. The case λl(x)=0, is also important in the number theory in the context of partitioning [12,14]. Numerical solution of first order pantograph type delay differential equation has been studied extensively in numerous papers such as [1,2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. A spectral collocation method is applied to integro-delay differential equation with proportional delay in [6,29,30]. A comprehensive list of references for the solution of DDEs can be found in [16]. A very limited work is available regarding the approximate solution of higher-order pantograph equation, especially using the higher-order schemes. To this end, we will use spectral discretization based on Legendre spectral collocation method to solve Eq (3) subject to Eq (4) numerically in order to get an accurate solution for a very few numbers of collocation points, as spectral methods are well known for their exponential rate of convergence.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we discuss the spectral method for the approximate solution of Eq (3). Section 3 includes some useful lemmas and convergence analysis of our proposed scheme in L∞ norm. In Section 4, we perform some numerical test to confirm the spectral accuracy and Section 5 consist of conclusion.
In order to fully use the properties of orthogonal polynomials for ease of convergence analysis, spectral methods will be employed on the standard interval [−1,1]. For this reason, we use the following transformation
x=T2(1+t),t=2xT−1. |
Using this transformation, Eqs (3) and (4) will take the form:
u″(t)=∑1l=0Al(t)u(l)(t)+∑1l=0Bl(t)u(l)(αlt+αl−1)+G(t),t∈[−1,1] | (5) |
subject to
u(−1)=y0,u′(1)=(T2)y1. | (6) |
Where
u(t)=y(T2(1+t)),G(t)=(T2)2g(T2(1+t)), |
A0=(T2)2λ0(T2(1+t)),A1=(T2)λ1(T2(1+t)), |
B0=(T2)2μ0(T2(1+t)),B1=(T2)μ1(T2(1+t)), |
with
u(−1)=u−1,u'(−1)=u′−1, |
where u−1=y0,u′−1=(T2)y1.
For any given positive integer N, we denote the collocation points by {tj}Nj=0, which is the set of (N+1), Legendre Gauss points corresponding to weights ωi. Let PN denote the space of all polynomials of degree not exceeding N. For any v∈C[−1,1], we define the Lagrange interpolating polynomial
INv(t)=∑Nj=0v(tj)Fj(t), | (7) |
where {F(tj)}Nj=0 is the Lagrange interpolation polynomial associated with the Legendre collocation points {tj}Nj=0. Spectral method will be employed to the integrated form. For this reason, integrate Eq (5), and using u−1=y0,u′−1=(T2)y1, we get,
u'(t)=u′−1+∑1l=0∫t−1Al(s)u(l)(s)ds+∑1l=0∫t−1Bl(s)u(l)(αls+αl−1)ds+∫t−1G(s)ds, | (8) |
u(t)=u−1+∫t−1u'(s)ds. | (9) |
We assume that Eqs (8) and (9) holds at collocation points {tj}Nj=0, to get
u′(tj)=u′−1+∑1l=0∫tj−1Al(s)u(l)(s)ds+∑1l=0∫tj−1Bl(s)u(l)(αls+αl−1)ds+∫tj−1G(s)ds, | (10) |
u(tj)=u−1+∫tj−1u'(s)ds,t∈[−1,1] | (11) |
for 0≤j≤N. In order to compute all these integral terms efficiently for the higher-order accuracy, we transform the interval of integral from [−1,tj] to [−1,1], as we have a very little information available for both u(s) and u′(s), we get
u′(tj)=u′−1+tj+12∑1l=0∫1−1Al(s(tj,φ))u(l)(s(tj,φ))dφ+tj+12∑1l=0∫1−1Bl(s(tj,φ))u(l)(αls(tj,φ)+αl−1)dφ+tj+12∫1−1G(s(tj,φ))dφ, | (12) |
u(tj)=u−1+tj+12∫1−1u′(s(tj,φ))dφ,t∈[−1,1] | (13) |
where, we use s=1+tj2φ+tj−12≈s(tj,φ).
Now using the (N+1) Gauss quadrature rule relative to the Legendre weight to approximate the integral term, we get
u′j=u′−1+tj+121∑l=0(N∑k=0Al(s(tj,φk))u(l)(s(tj,φk))ωk) |
+tj+121∑l=0(N∑k=0Bl(s′(tj,φk))u(l)(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1)ωk) |
+tj+12∑Nk=0G(s(tj,φk))ωk, | (14) |
uj=u−1+tj+12∑Nk=0u′(s(tj,φk))ωk. | (15) |
Let u′j ≈u'(tj),uj≈u(tj), 0 ≤j≤N. The set {φk}Nk=0 coincide with the collocation points {tj}Nj=0.
We expand u′,u and G using Lagrange interpolating polynomials, that is
u′(s)≈∑Np=0u′pFp(s),u(s)=∑Np=0upFp(s),G(s)≈∑Np=0GpFp(s), | (16) |
The Legendre spectral collocation method is to seek {u′j}Nj=0,{uj}Nj=0,{Gj}Nj=0, holds at colocation points, then the spectral approximation to Eqs (3) and (4) is given by:
u′j=u′−1+tj+121∑l=0(N∑p=0u(l)pN∑k=0Al(s(tj,φk))Fp(s(tj,φk))ωk) |
+tj+121∑l=0(N∑p=0u(l)pN∑k=0Bl(s(tj,φk))Fp(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1)ωk) |
+tj+12∑Np=0Gp∑Nk=0Fp(s(tj,φk))ωk, | (17) |
uj=u−1+tj+12∑Np=0u′p∑Nk=0Fp(s(tj,φk))ωk. | (18) |
To compute Fp(s) efficiently, we express it in terms of the Legendre functions of the form [8].
Fp(s)=∑Nm=0fpmLm(s), | (19) |
where fpm is called the discrete polynomial coefficients of Fp. The inverse relation is
fpm=1γm∑Nm=0Fm(xi)Lm(xi)ωi=Lm(xi)/γm,γm=(m+1╱2)−1,m<N, | (20) |
and γN=(N+1╱2)−1 for the Gauss and Gauss-Radau formulas.
To prove the convergence analysis of our method we first introduce the following useful lemmas.
Assume that a (N+1)− point Gauss, or Gauss-Radau, or Gauss-Lobatto quadrature formula relative to the Legendre weight is used to integrate the product uφ, where u∈Hm(I) with I:=(−1,1) for some m≥1 and φ∈pN. Then there exist a constant C independent of N such that [7].
|∫1−1u(x)φ(x)dx−⟨u,φ⟩N|≤CN−m|u|ˆH,N(I)‖φ‖L2(I), |
where
|u|ˆH,N(I)=(m∑k=min(m,N)‖u‖L2(I).)1/2 and ⟨u,φ⟩N=N∑k=0ωku(xk)φ(xk). |
Assume that u∈Hm(I) and denote INu the interpolation polynomial associated with the (N+1)− point Gauss, or Gauss-Radau, or Gauss-Lobatto points {xk}Nk=0. Then
‖u−INu‖L2(I)≤CN−m|u|ˆH,N(I) | (21) |
‖u−INu‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m|u|ˆH,N(I) | (22) |
Proof. The estimation in Eq (21) is given on p. 289 of [7]. The following estimate is also given in [7].
‖u−INu‖Hs(I)≤CN2s−1/2−m|u|ˆH,N(I),1≤s≤m, |
using the above estimate and the inequality
‖v‖L∞(a,b)≤√1b−a+2‖v‖1/2L2(a,b)‖v‖1/2H1(a,b),∀v∈H1(a,b), |
one obtains the estimation given in Eq (22).
Assume that Fj(t) be the j−th Lagrange interpolation polynomial with the (N+1)− point Gauss, or Gauss-Radau, or Gauss-Lobatto points {tk}Nk=0. Then
maxt∈I∑Nj=0|Fj(t)|≤C√N. | (23) |
Let T>0 and C1,C2≥0. If a non-negative integrable function E(t) satisfies
E(t)≤C1∫t0E(αs)ds′+C2∫t0E(s)ds+G(t),∀t∈[0,T], | (24) |
where 0<α<1 is a constant and G(t) is a nonnegative function, then
‖E‖L∞(I)≤C‖G‖L∞(I) | (25) |
Proof. It follows from Eq (23) and a simple change of variable that
E(t)≤C11α∫t0E(s)ds′+C2∫t0E(s)ds+G(t),∀t∈[0,T], | (26) |
since 0<α<1 and where G(s)≥0, we have
E(t)≤Cα−1∫t0E(s)ds+G(t), |
which is a standard Gronwall inequality. This leads to the estimate given in Eq (26).
Consider the pantograph Eqs (3) and (4) and its spectral approximations Eqs (17) and (18). If the functions λl(t) and μl(t) are smooth (which implies that the solution of Eqs (3) and (4) is also smooth), then
‖U(l)−u(l)‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m1∑l=0|Alu|ˆHm−1,N(I)+CN3/4−m1∑l=0|Blu|ˆHm−1,N(I) |
+CN1/2−m∑1l=0|Bl|ˆHm,,N(I)‖u‖L2(I) | (27) |
where U is the polynomial of degree N associated with the spectral approximation Eqs (17) and (18) and C is a constant independent of N.
Proof. Following the notation in Lemma 1, the numerical scheme given in Eqs (17) and (18), can be written as
u′j=u′−1+tj+121∑l=0(Al(s(tj,φk))U(l)(s(tj,φk)))N,tj |
+tj+121∑l=0(Bl(s(tj,φk))U(l)(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1))N,tj |
+∫tj−1G(s)ds | (28) |
uj=u−1+∫tj−1U′(s)ds. | (29) |
In order to use Lemma 1, we write Eqs (28) and (29) as
u′j=u′−1+tj+121∑l=0∫1−1(Al(s(tj,φk))U(l)(s(tj,φk)))dφ |
+tj+121∑l=0∫1−1(Bl(s(tj,φk))U(l)(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1))dφ |
+∫tj−1G(s)ds−tj+12∑1l=0Il(tj), | (30) |
where
Il(t)=u′−1+tj+12∫1−1(Al(s(tj,φk))U(l)(s(tj,φk)))dφ−(Al(s(tj,φk))U(l)(s(tj,φk)))N,t′+∫1−1(Bl(s(tj,φk))U(l)(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1))dφ−(Bl(s(tj,φk))U(l)(αls(tj,φk)+αl−1))N,t′. |
Using the estimation given in Lemma 2, we get
‖Il‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m|Al|ˆHm,N(I)+CN3/4−m|Bl|ˆHm,N(I)‖U(l)‖L2(I) |
Multiplying Fj(t) on both sides of Eqs (30) and (31) summing up from 0 to N yield
U′(t)=u′−1+∑1l=0IN∫t−1Al(s)U(l)(s)ds+∑1l=0IN∫t−1Bl(s)U(l)(αls+αl−1)ds+IN∫t−1G(s)ds, | (31) |
U(t)=u−1+IN∫tj−1U′(s)ds. | (32) |
Similarly, multiplying Fj(t) on both sides of Eqs (10) and (11) summing up from 0 to N yield
INu′(t)=u′−1+∑1l=0IN∫t−1Al(s)u(l)(s)ds+∑1l=0IN∫t−1Bl(s)u(l)(αls+αl−1)ds+IN∫t−1G(s)ds, | (33) |
INu(t)=u−1+IN∫tj−1u′(s)ds. | (34) |
It follows from Eqs (31)–(34) that
eu′(t)+INu′(t)−u′(t)=1∑l=0IN∫t−1Al(s)eu′(s)ds+1∑l=0IN∫t−1Bl(s)eu′(αls+αl−1)ds+IN∫t−1ev(s)ds+1∑l=0Jl(t), |
eu(t)+INu(t)−u(t)=IN∫t−1eu′(s)ds, |
where
eu′(t)=u′(t)−U′(t),eu(t)=u(t)−U(t), |
Consequently,
eu′(t)=∫t−1ev(s)ds+1∑l=0∫t−1Al(s)eu′(s)ds+1∑l=0∫t−1Bl(s)eu′(αls+αl−1)ds |
+1∑l=0Jl(t)+f1(t)+f2(t)+1∑l=0Hl(t) |
eu(t)=∫t−1eu′(s)ds+f3(t)+f4(t), |
where f1(t)=u′(t)−INU′(t), f3(t)=u(t)−INu(t)
f2(t)=IN∫t−1ev(s)ds−∫t−1ev(s)ds,f4(t)=IN∫t−1eu′(s)ds−∫t−1eu′(s)ds, |
Hl(t)=IN∫t−1Al(s)eu′(s)ds−∫t−1Al(s)eu′(s)ds+IN∫t−1Bl(s)eu′(αls+αl−1)ds−∫t−1Bl(s)eu′(αls+αl−1)ds |
Using Lemma 2,
‖f1(t)‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m|u′|ˆHm,N(I),‖f3(t)‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m|u′|ˆHm,N(I) |
Using Lemma 2, with m=1,
‖f2(t)‖L∞(I)≤CN−1/4|ev(t)|L∞(I),‖f4(t)‖L∞(I)≤CN−1/4|eu′(t)|L∞(I) |
‖Hl(t)‖L∞(I)≤CN−1/4|eu′(t)|L∞(I). |
It follows from the Gronwall inequality presented in Lemma 4, to get
‖eu(1)‖L∞(I)≤C(‖J1‖L∞(I)+‖J2‖L∞(I)) |
Our next concern is the estimation of ‖J1‖L∞(I) and ‖J2‖L∞(I). First
‖J1‖L∞(I)≤C‖Ii,1‖L∞(I)+‖Ii,2‖L∞(I)maxt∈IN∑j=0Fj(t)≤CN1/2−m‖U‖L∞(I) |
≤CN1/2−m(‖eu(1)‖L∞(I)+‖u‖L∞(I)). | (35) |
‖J2‖L∞(I)≤CN3/4−m|Alu|ˆHm,N(I)+CN3/4−m|Blu(αlt)|ˆHm,N(I) |
The above two estimates, together with Eq (35), yields:
‖eu(1)‖L∞(I)≤CN1/2−m(‖J1‖L∞(I)+‖J2‖L∞(I))+CN3/4−m|Alu|ˆHm,N(I)+CN3/4−m|Blu(αlt)|ˆHm,N(I), |
which leads to the result of Theorem 1.
In order to confirm the theoretical results, we perform some numerical test to illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed scheme.
Consider the following constructed example [1]
{y″(x)=34y(x)+y(x2)−x2+2,0≤x≤1y(0)=y′(0)=0. |
The exact solution is given by y(x)=x2. The maximum point-wise error between numerical solution and exact solution for different value of N is shown in Figure 1, Table 1.
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 2.588e−04 | 3.730e−04 | 2.630e−04 |
8 | 5.850e−06 | 4.881e−06 | 4.373e−06 |
10 | 6.988e−08 | 4.736e−08 | 4.926e−08 |
12 | 7.704e−10 | 5.233e−10 | 2.701e−10 |
14 | 3.842e−12 | 3.101e−12 | 1.362e−12 |
16 | 1.688e−14 | 1.609e−14 | 1.688e−14 |
18 | 1.665e−15 | 1.305e−15 | 1.108e−15 |
20 | 6.661e−16 | 6.186e−16 | 4.856e−16 |
Consider the following nonlinear second-order equation of pantograph type
{y″(x)=−y(x)+5y2(x2),x≥0y(0)=1,y(0)=−2. |
The exact solution is given by y(x)=e−2x. The maximum point-wise error between numerical solution and exact solution for with respect to different N is shown in Figure 2, Table 2.
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.901e+00 | 4.650e−01 | 7.400e−01 |
8 | 5.850e−01 | 7.255e−02 | 1.009e−01 |
10 | 2.218e−02 | 4.024e−03 | 6.456e−03 |
12 | 1.093e−03 | 3.674e04 | 5.585e−04 |
14 | 7.824e−05 | 1.537e−05 | 2.584e−05 |
16 | 3.480e−06 | 8.481e−07 | 1.295e−06 |
18 | 1.039e−07 | 2.590e−08 | 3.863e−08 |
20 | 6.763e−08 | 8.806e−09 | 1.602e−09 |
Consider the following second-order equation
{y″(x)=−y(x2)−y2(t)+sin4(x)+sin2(x2)+8,x≥0y(0)=2,y′(0)=0. |
The exact solution is given by y(x)=5−cos2x2. The error behavior relative to N is displayed in Figure 3, Table 3.
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.081e−02 | 8.895e−03 | 8.615e−03 |
8 | 2.474e−04 | 1.734e−04 | 1.324e−04 |
10 | 8.401e−06 | 4.221e−06 | 4.782e−06 |
12 | 1.809e−07 | 8.732e−08 | 1.002e−07 |
14 | 2.396e−09 | 1.368e−09 | 1.480e−09 |
16 | 2.776e−11 | 1.361e−11 | 1.463e−11 |
18 | 2.223e−13 | 1.201e−13 | 1.339e−13 |
20 | 2.442e−15 | 1.098e−15 | 1.245e−15 |
A spectral method was introduced for the numerical solution of higher-order delay differential equation of pantograph equation to achieve the high order accuracy. A detail analysis of the proposed scheme is provided in L∞ norm. By solving some numerical examples, it is shown that the error between the exact and numerical solution decays exponentially, which further authenticates our theoretical results.
The author acknowledges the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Faisal University for the financial support under Nasher Track (Grant No. 206105).
The author declares that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
[1] |
S. Yuzbasi, S. M. Sezer, Shifted Legendre approximation with the residual correction to solve pantograph-delay type differential equations, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015), 6529–6542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.006
![]() |
[2] |
S. Yalçinbaş, M. Aynigul, M. Sezer, A collocation method using Hermite polynomials for approximate solution of pantograph equations, J. Franklin I., 348 (2011), 1128-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.05.003
![]() |
[3] |
M. Mustafa Bahşi, M. Çevik, Numerical solution of pantograph-type delay differential equations using perturbation-iteration algorithms, J. Appl. Math., 2015, 139821. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/139821 doi: 10.1155/2015/139821
![]() |
[4] |
H. Liu, A. Xiao, L. Su, Convergence of variational iteration method for second-order delay differential equations, J. Appl. Math., 2013, 634670. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/634670 doi: 10.1155/2013/634670
![]() |
[5] |
W. Zheng, Y. Chen, A spectral method for second order Volterra integro-differential equations with pantograph delay, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 5 (2013), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.12-m1209 doi: 10.4208/aamm.12-m1209
![]() |
[6] |
Y. Wei, Y. Chen, Legendre spectral collocation method for neutral and high-order Volterra integro-differential equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 81 (2014), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2014.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2014.02.012
![]() |
[7] | C. Canuto, M. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, T. A. Zang, Spectral methods: Fundamental in single domains, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. |
[8] | J. Shen, T. Tang, Spectral and high-order method with applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2006. |
[9] |
A. Iserles, On the generalized pantograph functional-differential equation, Europ. J. Appl. Math., 4 (1993), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792500000966 doi: 10.1017/S0956792500000966
![]() |
[10] | H. Brunner, Collocation methods for Volterra integral and related functional equations methods, Cambridge University Press, 2004. |
[11] |
A. Bellen, Preservation of superconvergence in the numerical integration of delay differential equations with proportional delay, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 22 (2002), 529-536. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/22.4.529 doi: 10.1093/imanum/22.4.529
![]() |
[12] |
T. Kato, J. B. Mcleod, The functional differential equation y'(x) = ay(λx)+b(yx), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 77 (1971), 891-937. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1971-12805-7 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1971-12805-7
![]() |
[13] |
H. Brunner, Q. Hu, Q. Lin, Geometric meshes in collocation methods for Volterra integral with proportional delay, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 21 (2001), 783-798. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/21.4.783 doi: 10.1093/imanum/21.4.783
![]() |
[14] |
K. Mahler, On a special functional equation, J. London Math. Soc., 15 (1940), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-15.2.115 doi: 10.1112/jlms/s1-15.2.115
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Liu, Numerical investigation of pantograph equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 24 (1997), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00028-7 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00028-7
![]() |
[16] | A. Bellen, M. Zennaro, Numerical methods for delay differentials equations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003. |
[17] |
Y. Liu, Numerical solution of implicit neutral functional differential equations, SIAM J. Nume. Anal., 36 (1999), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614299731867X doi: 10.1137/S003614299731867X
![]() |
[18] |
Y. Li, Stability analysis of θ-method for neutral functional-differential equation, Numer. Math., 70 (1995), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110050129 doi: 10.1007/s002110050129
![]() |
[19] |
A. Iserles, On nonlinear delay differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 344 (1994), 441-447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2154725 doi: 10.2307/2154725
![]() |
[20] | I. Ali, H. Brunner, H. T. Tang, A spectral method for pantograph-type delay differential equations and its convergence analysis, J. Comput. Math., 27 (2009), 254-265. |
[21] |
I. Ali, H. Brunner, T. Tang, Spectral methods for pantograph-type differential and integral equations with multiple delays, Front. Math. China, 4 (2009), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-009-0010-z doi: 10.1007/s11464-009-0010-z
![]() |
[22] |
D. Trif, Direct operatorial tau method for pantograph-type equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2194-2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.065 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.065
![]() |
[23] |
E. Ishiwata Y. Muroya, Rational approximation method for delay differential equations with proportional delay, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 741-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.086 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.086
![]() |
[24] |
S. P. Yang, A. G. Xiao, Convergence of the variational iteration method for solving multi-delay differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 2148-2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.099 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.099
![]() |
[25] | G. Yüksel, M. Sezer, A Chebyshev approximate method for solving pantograph equations, J. Adv. Res. Differ. Equat., 3 (2011), 14-29. |
[26] |
Ş. Yüzbaşi, An efficient algorithm for solving multi-pantograph equation systems, Comput. Math. Appl., 64 (2012), 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.062 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.062
![]() |
[27] |
M. Sezer, Ş. Yalçinbaş, M. Gülsu, A Taylor polynomial approach for solving generalized pantograph equations with nonhomogeneous term, Int. J. Comput. Math., 85 (2008), 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160701466784 doi: 10.1080/00207160701466784
![]() |
[28] |
X. Chen, L. Wang, The variational iteration method for solving a neutral functional differential equation with proportional delays, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 2696-2702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.01.037 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.01.037
![]() |
[29] | I. Ali, Convergence analysis of spectral methods for integro-differential equations with vanishing proportional delays, J. Comput. Math., 29 (2011), 49-60. |
[30] | I. Ali, Jacobi-spectral method for integro-delay differential equations with weakly singular kernels, Turk. J. Math., 39 (2015), 810-819. |
1. | Asfaw Tsegaye Moltot, Alemayehu Tamirie Deresse, S. A. Edalatpanah, Approximate Analytical Solution to Nonlinear Delay Differential Equations by Using Sumudu Iterative Method, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/2466367 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 2.588e−04 | 3.730e−04 | 2.630e−04 |
8 | 5.850e−06 | 4.881e−06 | 4.373e−06 |
10 | 6.988e−08 | 4.736e−08 | 4.926e−08 |
12 | 7.704e−10 | 5.233e−10 | 2.701e−10 |
14 | 3.842e−12 | 3.101e−12 | 1.362e−12 |
16 | 1.688e−14 | 1.609e−14 | 1.688e−14 |
18 | 1.665e−15 | 1.305e−15 | 1.108e−15 |
20 | 6.661e−16 | 6.186e−16 | 4.856e−16 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.901e+00 | 4.650e−01 | 7.400e−01 |
8 | 5.850e−01 | 7.255e−02 | 1.009e−01 |
10 | 2.218e−02 | 4.024e−03 | 6.456e−03 |
12 | 1.093e−03 | 3.674e04 | 5.585e−04 |
14 | 7.824e−05 | 1.537e−05 | 2.584e−05 |
16 | 3.480e−06 | 8.481e−07 | 1.295e−06 |
18 | 1.039e−07 | 2.590e−08 | 3.863e−08 |
20 | 6.763e−08 | 8.806e−09 | 1.602e−09 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.081e−02 | 8.895e−03 | 8.615e−03 |
8 | 2.474e−04 | 1.734e−04 | 1.324e−04 |
10 | 8.401e−06 | 4.221e−06 | 4.782e−06 |
12 | 1.809e−07 | 8.732e−08 | 1.002e−07 |
14 | 2.396e−09 | 1.368e−09 | 1.480e−09 |
16 | 2.776e−11 | 1.361e−11 | 1.463e−11 |
18 | 2.223e−13 | 1.201e−13 | 1.339e−13 |
20 | 2.442e−15 | 1.098e−15 | 1.245e−15 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 2.588e−04 | 3.730e−04 | 2.630e−04 |
8 | 5.850e−06 | 4.881e−06 | 4.373e−06 |
10 | 6.988e−08 | 4.736e−08 | 4.926e−08 |
12 | 7.704e−10 | 5.233e−10 | 2.701e−10 |
14 | 3.842e−12 | 3.101e−12 | 1.362e−12 |
16 | 1.688e−14 | 1.609e−14 | 1.688e−14 |
18 | 1.665e−15 | 1.305e−15 | 1.108e−15 |
20 | 6.661e−16 | 6.186e−16 | 4.856e−16 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.901e+00 | 4.650e−01 | 7.400e−01 |
8 | 5.850e−01 | 7.255e−02 | 1.009e−01 |
10 | 2.218e−02 | 4.024e−03 | 6.456e−03 |
12 | 1.093e−03 | 3.674e04 | 5.585e−04 |
14 | 7.824e−05 | 1.537e−05 | 2.584e−05 |
16 | 3.480e−06 | 8.481e−07 | 1.295e−06 |
18 | 1.039e−07 | 2.590e−08 | 3.863e−08 |
20 | 6.763e−08 | 8.806e−09 | 1.602e−09 |
N | L1error | L2error | L∞error |
6 | 1.081e−02 | 8.895e−03 | 8.615e−03 |
8 | 2.474e−04 | 1.734e−04 | 1.324e−04 |
10 | 8.401e−06 | 4.221e−06 | 4.782e−06 |
12 | 1.809e−07 | 8.732e−08 | 1.002e−07 |
14 | 2.396e−09 | 1.368e−09 | 1.480e−09 |
16 | 2.776e−11 | 1.361e−11 | 1.463e−11 |
18 | 2.223e−13 | 1.201e−13 | 1.339e−13 |
20 | 2.442e−15 | 1.098e−15 | 1.245e−15 |