A post geographical vision of emergent micro cultural rural material world

Angel Paniagua; Angel Paniagua

doi:10.3934/geosci.2024015

AIMS Geosciences

2024, Volume 10, Issue 2: 263-273. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024015

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

A post geographical vision of emergent micro cultural rural material world

Angel Paniagua ^,

Spanish Council for Scientific Research, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

Received: 08 January 2024 Revised: 19 March 2024 Accepted: 28 March 2024 Published: 09 April 2024

This paper analyzes the emergence of micro-cultural material worlds in marginal rural areas of Spain from the viewpoint of postmodern rural cultural geography. The methodology is qualitative and geo-ethnographic, based on the study of three cases that suggest a renewed relevance of place as cultural capital in the production and consumption pattern of new or renovated rural materialities. The main conclusions suggest that two sides characterized the renovated houses: externally linked with traditional spirit and style of the area and internal with an individual and cosmopolitan design These represent a new dialectic similarity/difference.
- rural,
- materialities,
- geography,
- postmaterial,
- global
Citation: Angel Paniagua. A post geographical vision of emergent micro cultural rural material world[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2024, 10(2): 263-273. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024015

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper analyzes the emergence of micro-cultural material worlds in marginal rural areas of Spain from the viewpoint of postmodern rural cultural geography. The methodology is qualitative and geo-ethnographic, based on the study of three cases that suggest a renewed relevance of place as cultural capital in the production and consumption pattern of new or renovated rural materialities. The main conclusions suggest that two sides characterized the renovated houses: externally linked with traditional spirit and style of the area and internal with an individual and cosmopolitan design These represent a new dialectic similarity/difference.

References

[1]	Soja EW (2000) Postmetropolis. Critical studies of cities and regions. London, John Wiley & Sons.
[2]	Harvey D (2019) Spaces of global capitalism. A theory of uneven geographical development. London, Verso. https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515115223
[3]	Philo C, Parr H, Soderstrom O (2019) 'On edge?': Studies in precarious urbanisms. Geoforum 101: 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.020 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.020
[4]	Soja EW (2010) Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, Univ. Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001
[5]	Feola G, Goodman MK, Suzunaga J, et al. (2023) Collective memories, place-framing and the politics of imaginary futures in sustainability transitions and transformation. Geoforum 138: 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.103668 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.103668
[6]	Murdoch J, Pratt AC (1993) Rural studies: modernism, postmodernism and the 'post-rural'. J Rural Stud 9: 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90053-M doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(93)90053-M
[7]	Pomeranz K (2000) The great divergence. Princenton Univ. Press. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823499
[8]	DeLanda M (2005) Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London, Continuum.
[9]	Deleuze G (1989) El pliegue. Leibniz y el barroco. Barcelona, Paidos.
[10]	Deleuze G (1988) Le pli. Leibniz y el barroco. Paris, Le Minuit.
[11]	Deleuze G (2002) Francis Bacon. Logique de la sensation. Paris, Ed. Seuil.
[12]	Lefebvre H (2014) Toward and architecture of enjoyment. Minneapolis, Minnesota Univ. Press.
[13]	College RG, Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial behavior. A geographic perspective. London, The Guilford Press.
[14]	Entrinkin JN (2011) The world in plain view. In Daniels S, Delyser D, Entrinkin JN, et al. (eds.), Envisioning landscapes, making worlds. Geography and the humanities. London, Routledge, 84–93.
[15]	Deleuze G, Guattari F (1991) Qu'est-ce que la philosophie? Paris, Ed. De Minuit.
[16]	Goodman MK., Doodman D, Redclift M (2010) Consuming space. Placing consumption in perspective. Farhan, Ashgate.
[17]	Harvey D (2009) Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York, Columbia Univ. Presss.
[18]	Paniagua A (2022) Recover old geographical materialities in rural ares; Key politics and processes of (dis)assemblages. Athens J Mediterr Stud 8: 247–256. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajms.8-4-4 doi: 10.30958/ajms.8-4-4
[19]	Mitchell D (2000) Cultural geography. A critical introduction. London, Blackwell.
[20]	Dumbadze A, Hudson S (2013) Contemporary art. 1980 to the present. London, Wiley-Blackwell.
[21]	Williams R (2016) The country and the city. London, Vintage.
[22]	Weber E (1976) Peasant into Frenchmen. The modernization of rural France 1870–1919. Redwood city. Stanford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804766036
[23]	Jackson JB (1984) Discovering the vernacular landscape. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press.
[24]	Harvey D (2017) The way of the world. London, Profile books.
[25]	Traganov J, Mitrasinovic M (2009) Travel, space, architecture. London, Routledge.
[26]	Johnson LG (2009) Cultural capitals. Farham, Ashgate.
[27]	Aquilino L, Harris J, Wise N (2021) A sense of rurality: events, placemaking and community participation in a small Welsh town. J Rural Stud 83: 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.013
[28]	Fytopoulou E, Tampakis S, Galatsidas S, et al. (2021) The role of events in local development: An analysis of residents' perspectives and visitor satisfaction. J Rural Stud 82: 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.018

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)