Research article Special Issues

E-Learning in Geography: new perspectives in post-pandemic

  • Received: 07 December 2021 Revised: 28 December 2021 Accepted: 12 January 2022 Published: 19 January 2022
  • Recent developments in low-cost information technology, fast internet, intelligent terminals, apps that can manage the most varied activities in a professional but simple way, have allowed their diffusion in sectors traditionally reluctant to rapid change. The pandemic crisis caused by Covid-19 and the consequent provisions of social distancing to curb its spread, have also forced the world of education to deal with this modality. Terms such as Distance Learning and Smart Working have forcefully entered the vocabulary and daily life of millions of people. The persistence of the pandemic due to the variants of the virus is convincing even the most reluctant to change that the new "normal" will have to rely on information technology to a greater extent than in the past. In much of the Western world, where culture has long been a thriving economic sector, much has been invested for decades to strengthen and disseminate distance learning activities recognized as economically and socially beneficial. The European institutions have moved in this direction more recently. The author's experience in the last two years in emergency remote education in geography at university level has not always been positive. He therefore felt the urgency to consider adopting existing standards and best practices in order to improve outcomes and achieve effective online geography learning. The evident advantages of adopting good quality e-learning for an extended community would facilitate understanding and acceptance even in the Italian school and academic environment, usually conservative and conformist. In this environment, up to now, many have in fact feared that it could lead to the endorsement of distance learning, viewed with contempt if not really with aversion as it is considered to be of poor quality.

    Citation: Stefania Palmentieri. E-Learning in Geography: new perspectives in post-pandemic[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(1): 52-67. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022004

    Related Papers:

  • Recent developments in low-cost information technology, fast internet, intelligent terminals, apps that can manage the most varied activities in a professional but simple way, have allowed their diffusion in sectors traditionally reluctant to rapid change. The pandemic crisis caused by Covid-19 and the consequent provisions of social distancing to curb its spread, have also forced the world of education to deal with this modality. Terms such as Distance Learning and Smart Working have forcefully entered the vocabulary and daily life of millions of people. The persistence of the pandemic due to the variants of the virus is convincing even the most reluctant to change that the new "normal" will have to rely on information technology to a greater extent than in the past. In much of the Western world, where culture has long been a thriving economic sector, much has been invested for decades to strengthen and disseminate distance learning activities recognized as economically and socially beneficial. The European institutions have moved in this direction more recently. The author's experience in the last two years in emergency remote education in geography at university level has not always been positive. He therefore felt the urgency to consider adopting existing standards and best practices in order to improve outcomes and achieve effective online geography learning. The evident advantages of adopting good quality e-learning for an extended community would facilitate understanding and acceptance even in the Italian school and academic environment, usually conservative and conformist. In this environment, up to now, many have in fact feared that it could lead to the endorsement of distance learning, viewed with contempt if not really with aversion as it is considered to be of poor quality.



    加载中


    [1] Fragmented future. Available from: http://darcyd.com/fragmented_future.pdf
    [2] Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027). Available from: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital/education-action-plan
    [3] Schultz RB (2012) A Critical Examination of the Teaching Methodologies Pertaining to Distance Learning in Geographic Education: Andragogy in an Adult Online Certificate Program. RIGEO 2: 45–60.
    [4] Balram S, Boxall J (2019) Teaching and learning pedagogies in higher education geographic information science, GIScience teaching and learning perspectives. Advances in geographic information science, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06058-9
    [5] Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, et al. (2020) The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Rev 27.
    [6] Hanson M (2021) Cost of Online Education vs. Traditional Education. Available from: https://educationdata.org/cost-of-online-education-vs-traditional-education
    [7] Branch RM, Dousay TA (2015) Survey of instructional design models, Association for Educational Communications and Technolog.
    [8] Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Borokhovski E, et al. (2009) A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev Educ Res 79: 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844 doi: 10.3102/0034654309333844
    [9] Protopsaltis S, Baum S (2019) Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy. Online learn. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330442019_Does_Online_Education_Live_Up_to_Its_Promise_A_Look_at_the_Evidence_and_Implications_for_Federal_Policy#fullTextFileContent
    [10] Helping you deliver on your online promise. Available from: https://www.qualitymatters.org/
    [11] Means B, Bakia M, Murphy R (2014) Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how, New York: Routledge.
    [12] Carey J (2008) Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. Rev Res Educ 32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
    [13] Guarracino M (2028) E-Learning e nuove forme di interattività nelle Digital Humanities. Il Mulino Rivista Web, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.14651/92776
    [14] Demirci A, De Miguel R, Bednarz SW (2018) Geography education for global understanding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    [15] Milson AJ, Demirci A, Kerski JJ (2012) International perspectives on teaching and learning with GIS in secondary schools, New York: Springer.
    [16] Chen C, Wang Y (2015) Geospatial education in high schools: Curricula, methodologies and practices. Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world: Geospatial practices and lessons learned, Japan: Springer, 67–76.
    [17] ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics (2021) Available from: https://committee.iso.org/home/tc211
    [18] GeoSpatial Technologies® (GST). Available from: https://geospatialtech.com/
    [19] Baker T, Kerski JJ, Huynh N, et al. (2012) Call for an agenda and center for GIS education research. Rev Int Geogr Educ Online 2: 254–288.
    [20] Gober P (1998) Distance learning and geography's soul. Assoc Am Geogr Newsl 33: 1–2.
    [21] Picciano AG (2017) Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learn 21: 166–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225 doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
    [22] Schultz RB (2013) Development of a new online graduate certificate program in AP human geography: Professional development for AP human geography teachers, National Council for Geographic Education Annual Conference, Denver, CO.
    [23] Bednarz SW, Bednarz RS (2008) Spatial thinking: The key to success in using geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom, Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom, Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.521849
    [24] Baker TR, Battersby S, Bednarz SW, et al. (2015) A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. J Geogr 114: 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.950684 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2014.950684
    [25] Hong JE, Melville A (2018) Training social studies teachers to develop inquiry-based GIS lessons. J Geogr 117: 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2017.1371205 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2017.1371205
    [26] Charles MT, Kolvoord RA (2016) Geospatial semester: Developing students' 21st century thinking skills with GIS: A three-year study. Pyrex J Educ Res Rev 2: 67–78.
    [27] Metoyer S, Bednarz R (2017) Spatial Thinking Assists Geographic Thinking: Evidence from a Study Exploring the Effects of Geospatial Technology. J Geogr 116: 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495
    [28] Lee J, Bednarz R (2009) Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. J Geogra Higher Educ 33: 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276714 doi: 10.1080/03098260802276714
    [29] Hubbard P, Kitchin R, Bartley B, et al. (2002) Thinking geographically: Space, theory and contemporary human geography, London: Continuum.
    [30] Metoyer S, Bednarz R (2017) Spatial thinking assists geographic thinking: Evidence from a study exploring the effects of geospatial technology. J Geogr 116: 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495
    [31] Lambert D, Morgan J (2010) Teaching geography. A conceptual approach, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    [32] Butt G (2017) Debating the place of knowledge within geography education: Reinstatement, reclamation or recovery? The power of geographical thinking, Dordrecht: Springer, 13–26.
    [33] Fargher M (2018) WebGIS for Geography Education: Towards a GeoCapabilities Approach. ISPRS J Geo-Inf 7: 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030111 doi: 10.3390/ijgi7030111
    [34] Lambert D, Solem M, Tani S (2015) Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105: 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1022128 doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1022128
    [35] Donert K, De Miguel R, Lupi A (2019) Youth Metre: Open data to empower young people to engage in democracy and policymaking. Geospatial technology in geography education, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 87–101.
    [36] Kim SY (2017) Smart learning: Approaches and materials for language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Lang Learn 20: 62–83. Available from: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002267775
    [37] Hong JE (2015) Teaching GIS and other geospatial technologies to in service teachers, Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world: Geospatial practices and lessons learned, Japan: Springer, 117–126.
    [38] Matusch T, Schneibel A, Dannwolf L, et al. (2018) Implementing a modern e-learning strategy in an interdisciplinary environment—Empowering UNESCO stakeholders to use earth observation. Geosciences 8: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120432 doi: 10.3390/geosciences8120432
    [39] Sinha G, Smucker TA, Lovell EJ, et al. (2017) The pedagogical benefits of participatory GIS for geographic education. J Geogr 116: 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2016.1215488 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2016.1215488
    [40] Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
    [41] Jo I, Hong JE, Verma K (2016) Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. J Geogr Higher Educ 40: 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1150439 doi: 10.1080/03098265.2016.1150439
    [42] Kolvoord B, Keranen K, Rittenhouse S (2019) The Geospatial Semester: Concurrent Enrolment in Geospatial Technologies. J Geogr 118: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1483961 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2018.1483961
    [43] Manson S, Shannon J, Eria S, et al (2014) Resource needs and pedagogical value of Web mapping for spatial thinking. J Geogr 113: 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2013.790915 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2013.790915
    [44] Milson AJ, Roberts JA (2008) The status of geospatial technologies in U.S. high school geography standards. Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom, Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 39–60.
    [45] Mitchell JT (2018) Pre-service teachers learn to teach geography: A suggested course model. J Geogr Higher Educ 42: 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1398719 doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1398719
    [46] Curtis MD (2019) Professional Technologies in Schools: The Role of Pedagogical Knowledge in Teaching with Geospatial Technologies. J Geogr 118: 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1544267 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2018.1544267
    [47] Hong JE, Stonier F (2015) GIS in-service teacher training based on TPACK. J Geogr 114: 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.947381 doi: 10.1080/00221341.2014.947381
    [48] National Council for the Social Studies, The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. 2013. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.
    [49] Baker TR, Palmer R (2014) Integrating geospatial technology. TechEdge 4: 24–25.
    [50] Hanson M (2021) Cost of Online Education vs. Traditional Education. Available from: https://educationdata.org/cost-of-online-education-vs-traditional-education
    [51] Stoltman JP, Lidstone J, Kidman G (2017) The 2016 International Charter on Geographical Education. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 26: 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1272849 doi: 10.1080/10382046.2017.1272849
    [52] Donert K (2014) Building capacity for Digital-Earth education in Europe, Innovative learning geography. New challenges for the 21st Century, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 9–20.
    [53] Sener J (2019) QUALITY MATTERS: INTER-INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FOR ONLINE COURSES. Sener Learn Serv, 69–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1772
    [54] Tanis CJ (2020) The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Res Learn Technol 28: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319 doi: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2319
    [55] Morgan J (2018) Are we thinking geographically? 2nd Debates in geography education, London: Routledge. 287–296.
    [56] De Mers MN (2010) Second Life as a surrogate for experiential learning. IJVPLE 1: 16–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2010040102 doi: 10.4018/jvple.2010040102
    [57] Dastrup A (2020) Introduction to Human Geography, Open geography Education textbooks resources.
    [58] Robinson AC, Kerski JK, Long EC. et al. (2015) Maps and the geospatial revolution: Teaching a massive open online course (MOOC) in geography. J Geogr Higher Educ 39: 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.996850 doi: 10.1080/03098265.2014.996850
    [59] Marshall C (1998) The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World, Success and Failures of Digital Libraries, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 98. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/25539
    [60] Mueller P, Oppenheimer DM (2014) The pen is mightier than the keyboard. Psychol Sci 25: 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581 doi: 10.1177/0956797614524581
    [61] Münster S, Niebling F, Bruschke J, et al. (2020) Urban History Research and Discovery in the Age of Digital Repositories. A Report About Users and Requirements. Digital Cultural Heritage. Springer, Cham, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15200-0_5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2765) PDF downloads(169) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog