The insiders' gaze: fieldworks, social media and visual methodologies in urban tourism

Teresa Graziano; Teresa Graziano

doi:10.3934/geosci.2022021

AIMS Geosciences

2022, Volume 8, Issue 3: 366-384. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022021

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

The insiders' gaze: fieldworks, social media and visual methodologies in urban tourism

Teresa Graziano ^,

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

Received: 03 March 2022 Revised: 07 April 2022 Accepted: 08 May 2022 Published: 19 May 2022

This paper aims at scrutinizing the role of two overlapping dimensions in tourism geography teaching and learning: the real-world perspective, represented by the fieldwork as a long-established practice in geographical teaching; and the digital sphere, namely the use of visual methodologies and social media as tools to activate city image-making in tourist practices.

In particular, the work deepens critical aspects and potentialities of a mixed-method approach combining both traditional methods and more innovative tools to carry out researches and teaching in the field of tourism geography and cultural heritage. Theoretically inserted at the interplay among tourism, digital geography and visual methods, it draws on a series of workshops organized with third-level students between 2016 and 2018. Although problematizing some crucial conceptual issues related to the role of visualities and new technologies, findings highlight the didactic effectiveness of mixed methods that entail the more traditional ones such as team working and fieldworks, and the most innovative such as visual methods and social media, to increase students' interest in geography learning and stimulating their own perceptions of ordinary landscapes through a gaze repositioning.
- geography teaching,
- visual methods,
- social media,
- urban tourism
Citation: Teresa Graziano. The insiders' gaze: fieldworks, social media and visual methodologies in urban tourism[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(3): 366-384. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022021

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper aims at scrutinizing the role of two overlapping dimensions in tourism geography teaching and learning: the real-world perspective, represented by the fieldwork as a long-established practice in geographical teaching; and the digital sphere, namely the use of visual methodologies and social media as tools to activate city image-making in tourist practices.

In particular, the work deepens critical aspects and potentialities of a mixed-method approach combining both traditional methods and more innovative tools to carry out researches and teaching in the field of tourism geography and cultural heritage. Theoretically inserted at the interplay among tourism, digital geography and visual methods, it draws on a series of workshops organized with third-level students between 2016 and 2018. Although problematizing some crucial conceptual issues related to the role of visualities and new technologies, findings highlight the didactic effectiveness of mixed methods that entail the more traditional ones such as team working and fieldworks, and the most innovative such as visual methods and social media, to increase students' interest in geography learning and stimulating their own perceptions of ordinary landscapes through a gaze repositioning.

References

[1]	Urry J (1990) The tourist gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
[2]	Urry J, Larsen J (2011) The Tourist Gaze 3.0. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251904
[3]	Foucault M (1976) The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock.
[4]	Maoz D (2006) The mutual gaze. Ann Tourism Res 33: 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2005.10.010
[5]	Colomb C, Novy J (2017) Protest and Resistance in the Tourist City. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719306
[6]	Lash SM, Urry J (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
[7]	Robert M, Newman P (2009) World tourism cities. Developing tourism off the beaten track, London-New York: Routledge.
[8]	Condevaux A, Djament-Tran G, Gravari-Barbas M (2016) Avant et après le(s) tourismes(s). Trajectoires des lieux et rôles des acteurs du tourisme « hors des sentiers battus » . Une analyse bibliographique. Via Tourism Rev. https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.409
[9]	Girard A (2013) Faut-il raccorder une théorie générale de la postmodernité à une théorie à moyenne portée du post-tourisme? In Bourdeau P, Hugues F, Perrin-Bensahel L., Eds., Fin (?) et confins du tourisme. Interroger le statut et les pratiques de la récréation contemporaine. Paris: L'Harmattan, 43-52.
[10]	Rabbiosi C (2016) Developing participatory tourism in Milan, Italy. Via Tourism Rev 9. https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.291
[11]	Richards G (2014) Creativity and tourism in the city. Curr Issues Tourism 17:119-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.783794 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.783794
[12]	Uriely N (2005) The tourist experience. conceptual developments. Ann Tourism Res 32: 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.07.008 doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.07.008
[13]	Rabbiosi C (2016) Place branding performances in tourist local food shops. Ann Tourism Res 60: 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2016.07.002
[14]	Graziano T, Privitera D (2020) Cultural heritage, tourist attractiveness and augmented reality: insights from Italy. J Heritage Tourism 15: 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1719116 doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2020.1719116
[15]	Germann M (2012) Travel Connections: Tourism, Technology and Togetherness in a Mobile World. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123096
[16]	Dinhopl A, Gretztel U (2016) Selfie-taking as touristic looking. Ann Tourism Res 57: 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.12.015 doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2015.12.015
[17]	Gretzel U, Sigala M, Xiang Z, et al. (2015) Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electron Markets 25: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8 doi: 10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8
[18]	Boy JD, Uitermark J (2016) How to Study the City on Instagram. PLoS ONE 11: e0158161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.015816 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.015816
[19]	Salter CL, Meserve P (1991) Life Lists and the education of geographer. Prof Geogr 43: 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1991.00520.x doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1991.00520.x
[20]	Ryan JR (1997) Picturing Empire: Photograph and the Visualization of the British Empire. London: Routlege.
[21]	Rose G (2016) Visual methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.
[22]	Banks M (2001) Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020284
[23]	Cosgrove D (2008) Geography and Vision. Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. London-New York: I.B. Tauris and Co. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755620791
[24]	Palermo G (2022) Visual Methodologies and Geography's education in the pandemic time: notes on geopolitics of migration in the "Mediterranean Complex". AIMS Geosci 8: 254-265. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022015 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022015
[25]	Haraway DJ (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873106

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)