Preserving cultural landscapes in the face of globalization. The musealization of Sicilian heritage

Emanuela Caravello; Emanuela Caravello

doi:10.3934/geosci.2023037

AIMS Geosciences

2023, Volume 9, Issue 4: 697-712. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023037

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Preserving cultural landscapes in the face of globalization. The musealization of Sicilian heritage

Emanuela Caravello ^,

Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement (SPPEFF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Received: 17 October 2023 Revised: 06 November 2023 Accepted: 06 November 2023 Published: 13 November 2023

This contribution critically reflects the musealization of landscapes as an effective response to the rapid transformations brought about by globalization. Focusing on the case of Sicilian heritage, we examine how the conservation and representation of traditional landscapes in museums serve as a defensive reaction to the perceived threats of homogenization and cultural loss caused by global processes. This article fits into the debate on cultural landscapes and outlines the protection policies implemented by UNESCO while delving into the role of museum collections. In this specific context of preserving the tangible and intangible components of cultural heritage, the landscape is intertwined with the role of local communities in a changing world. We also explore the concept of authenticity in landscapes and its significance in preserving cultural identities. Through qualitative methodology involving critical analysis of literature and document examination, the research illustrates how the musealization of Sicilian landscapes has aimed to safeguard collective memory and cultural heritage. However, this article also highlights potential risks associated with this process, such as the static representation of dynamic cultures and the selective nature of museum curation. Ultimately, this study advocates for transparent and multifaceted interpretations of cultural landscapes to avoid the creation of artificial myths and to preserve the polysemy of the landscape's meaning. By critically examining the context through significant examples, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of musealization in conserving and representing cultural landscapes in the face of globalization's challenges.
- cultural landscapes,
- cultural heritage,
- authenticity,
- risk,
- heritage communities,
- musealization
Citation: Emanuela Caravello. Preserving cultural landscapes in the face of globalization. The musealization of Sicilian heritage[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(4): 697-712. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023037

Related Papers:

Abstract

This contribution critically reflects the musealization of landscapes as an effective response to the rapid transformations brought about by globalization. Focusing on the case of Sicilian heritage, we examine how the conservation and representation of traditional landscapes in museums serve as a defensive reaction to the perceived threats of homogenization and cultural loss caused by global processes. This article fits into the debate on cultural landscapes and outlines the protection policies implemented by UNESCO while delving into the role of museum collections. In this specific context of preserving the tangible and intangible components of cultural heritage, the landscape is intertwined with the role of local communities in a changing world. We also explore the concept of authenticity in landscapes and its significance in preserving cultural identities. Through qualitative methodology involving critical analysis of literature and document examination, the research illustrates how the musealization of Sicilian landscapes has aimed to safeguard collective memory and cultural heritage. However, this article also highlights potential risks associated with this process, such as the static representation of dynamic cultures and the selective nature of museum curation. Ultimately, this study advocates for transparent and multifaceted interpretations of cultural landscapes to avoid the creation of artificial myths and to preserve the polysemy of the landscape's meaning. By critically examining the context through significant examples, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of musealization in conserving and representing cultural landscapes in the face of globalization's challenges.

References

[1]	Bowen G (2009) Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qual Res J 9: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
[2]	Pu H, Wang X (2023) The impact of environment on cultural relics. Sci Cult 9: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7918252 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7918252
[3]	Stoffle R, Arnold R, Van Vlack K (2022) Landscape Is Alive: Nuwuvi Pilgrimage and Power Places in Nevada. Land 11: 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081208 doi: 10.3390/land11081208
[4]	UNESCO (2008) Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Annex Ⅲ. Paris: World Heritage Centre.
[5]	Rössler M (2006) World Heritage cultural landscapes: A UNESCO flagship programme 1992–2006. Landscape Res 31: 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390601004210 doi: 10.1080/01426390601004210
[6]	Padiglione V (2008) Poetiche dal museo etnografico. Spezie morali e kit di sopravvivenza. Imola: La Mandragora.
[7]	Harrison R (2012) Heritage: critical approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857
[8]	Smith MK, Robinson M (2006) Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Partecipation and (Re)Presentation. Clevedon and Buffalo: Channel View Pubblication. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410452
[9]	Council of Europe (2005) Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society - Faro Convention. Strasbourg.
[10]	Davison G (2008) Heritage: From Pastiche to Patrimony. In: Fairclough G, Harrison R, Jameson JH Jr, Schofield J (eds.), The Heritage Reader. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 31–41.
[11]	Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
[12]	Giddens A (1990) Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[13]	Harvey D (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
[14]	Allen J, Hamnett C (1995) A Shrinking World? Global Unevenness and Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[15]	Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance: How the communication revolution will change our lives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[16]	Badie F (1995) La fin des territoires. Paris: Fayard.
[17]	Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
[18]	Relph E (1987) The Modern Urban Landscape. London: Croom Helm.
[19]	Daniels S (1993) Fields of vision: landscape imagery and national identity in England and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[20]	Massey D, Jess P (2001) Luoghi, culture e globalizzazione. Torino: UTET.
[21]	Said EW (2000) Invention, memory, and place. Crit Inquiry 26: 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/448963 doi: 10.1086/448963
[22]	Cosgrove D (1984) Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm Ltd.
[23]	Cosgrove D, Daniels S (1988) The Iconography of Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[24]	Whatmore S (2002) From farming to agribusiness: the global agro-food system. In: Johnston RJ, Taylor P, Watts M (eds.), Geographies of global change, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 57–67.
[25]	Labadi S (2010) World Heritage, authenticity and post-authenticity. In: Labadi S, Long C (eds.) Heritage and Globalisation, London: Routledge, 66–84.
[26]	Livingstone DN (2010) Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[27]	Ionesov VI, Kurulenko EA (2015) Things as characters of culture: symbolic nature and meanings of material objects in changing world. Sci Cult 1: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18450 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18450
[28]	Buttitta A (1984) Dove fiorisce il limone. Palermo: Sellerio.
[29]	de Spuches G (2003) Luoghi comuni e mezze verità. Sguardi europei e vedute della Sicilia. In: Cusimano G (ed.) Scritture di paesaggio, Bologna: Pàtron Editore, 155–170.
[30]	Cusimano G (1999) La costruzione del paesaggio siciliano: geografi e scrittori a confronto. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell'Università di Palermo – La Memoria 12.
[31]	Rose G (1995) Place and identity: a sense of place. In Massey DB, Jess P (eds.), A place in the world? Places, Cultures and Globalization, Oxford: Open University, 87–132.
[32]	Clemente P (1989) Museografia, estetica, comunicazione, Nuove Effemeridi Ⅱ: 97–102.
[33]	Broccolini A, Clemente P, Giancristofaro L (2021) Patrimonio in comunicazione. Nuove sfide per i Musei Demoetnoantropologici, Quaderni di Antropologia museale 4. Palermo: Edizioni Museo Pasqualino.
[34]	D'Agostino G (2020) Postfazione. La museografia etnoantropologica in Italia e i processi di patrimonializzazione. In: R. Harrison Il patrimonio culturale. Un approccio critico, Milano-Torino: Pearson, 211–249.
[35]	Cocchiara G (1938) La vita e l'arte del popolo siciliano nel Museo Pitrè. Palermo: Ciuni.
[36]	Palumbo B (2003) L'Unesco e il campanile. Antropologia, politica e beni culturali in Sicilia orientale. Roma: Meltemi.
[37]	De Varine H (2005) Le radici del futuro. Il patrimonio culturale al servizio dello sviluppo locale. Bologna: Clueb.
[38]	Vecchio B (2002) Riflettendo sul paesaggio chiuso in un museo. In: de Spuches G (ed.), Atlante virtuale, vol. Ⅱ, Palermo: Laboratorio Geografico, 45–52.
[39]	Simmel G (1985) Il volto e il ritratto. Saggi sull'arte. Bologna: Il Mulino.
[40]	Daniels S (2011) Geographical imagination. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00440.x doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00440.x

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)