Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

Genetic characterization of Indonesian sorghum landraces (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) for yield traits

  • Received: 27 June 2023 Revised: 05 November 2023 Accepted: 09 November 2023 Published: 17 January 2024
  • Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is the fifth most produced cereal crop in the world. The use of sorghum is very diverse and most parts of the plant, including stem, leaves, grain, panicles, stem juice, and bagasse, can be utilized as human food, animal feed, and material for industry and bioenergy production. The collection of local sorghum genetic resources should be explored to identify potential gene sources for the development of superior varieties. This study was conducted to evaluate the production potential of 40 Indonesian sorghum accessions and to further identify potentially useful accessions. Five accessions belonging to cluster 3 had high biomass productivity, including Coley, Keler, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, and Super 1. In particular, Lokal Kaltim and Lao combined high biomass yield with grain yield. Accessions with high biomass has potential for use as feedstock for biomass energy production and forage.

    Citation: Reni Lestari, Mahat Magandhi, Arief Noor Rachmadiyanto, Kartika Ning Tyas, Enggal Primananda, Iin Pertiwi Amin Husaini, Frisca Damayanti, Rizmoon Nurul Zulkarnaen, Hendra Helmanto, Reza Ramdan Rivai, Hakim Kurniawan, Masaru Kobayashi. Genetic characterization of Indonesian sorghum landraces (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) for yield traits[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 129-147. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024008

    Related Papers:

    [1] Badreddine Belhadi, Rachid Souilah, Redha Ould-Kiar, Mohamed Yousfi, Djaafar Djabali, Boubekeur Nadjemi . Effects of phenotype and wet milling procedures on the starch isolation from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) grains. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 448-461. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021026
    [2] Ana Nurhasanah, Wawan Hermawan, Tineke Mandang, Astu Unadi, Uning Budiharti, Suparlan, Herry Susanto, Anugerah Fitri Amalia, Teguh Wikan Widodo, Maria Josefine Tjaturetna Budiastuti, Ni Putu Dian Nitamiwati, Diang Sagita, Muhammad Hidayat, Arif Samudiantono . Engineering properties of sorghum bioguma-variety for designing appropriate thresher and chopper machine. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 720-735. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023039
    [3] Rosemary Kobue-Lekalake, Geremew Bultosa, Oduetse Daniel Gopadile, Gulelat Desse Haki, Moenyane Molapisi, Eyassu Seifu, Bonno Sekwati-Monang, John Gwamba, Kethabile Sonno, Boitumelo Mokobi . Effects of Bambara groundnut and Butternut blending on functional and sensory properties of sorghum flour porridge. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 265-281. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022017
    [4] Penda Sissoko, Gry Synnevag, Jens B. Aune . Effects of low-cost agricultural technology package on income, cereal surplus production, household expenditure, and food security in the drylands of Mali. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 22-36. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022002
    [5] Ilaria Marotti, Giovanni Dinelli, Valeria Bregola, Sara Bosi . Nutritional characterization of Italian common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): fatty acid profiles for “genotype-niche diversity” fingerprints. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 543-562. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.543
    [6] Budi Setiawan, Azizah Rohimah, Eny Palupi, Ahmad Sulaeman, Ekowati Handharyani . Physical-sensory characteristics and nutritional contents of black oncom and peanut ingredients-based biscuits as an elderly supplementary food. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 868-881. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.868
    [7] Santi Noviasari, Feri Kusnandar, Agus Setiyono, Slamet Budijanto . Antioxidant activity and inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase in fermented black rice bran-based analog rice. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 61-72. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022004
    [8] Site Noorzuraini Abd Rahman, Rosimah Nulit, Faridah Qamaruz Zaman, Khairun Hisam Nasir, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim, Mohd Ramdzan Othman, Nur Idayu Abd Rahim, Nor Sufiah Sebaweh . Profile of the grain physical traits and physicochemical properties of selected Malaysian rice landraces for future use in a breeding program. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 934-958. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024051
    [9] Julliane Destro de Lima, Wesley Ribeiro Rivadavea, Sydney Antonio Frehner Kavalco, Affonso Celso Gonçalves Junior, Ana Daniela Lopes, Glacy Jaqueline da Silva . Chemical and nutritional characterization of bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 932-944. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021056
    [10] Eric Tzyy Jiann Chong, Lucky Poh Wah Goh, Mariam Abd. Latip, Zaleha Abdul Aziz, Noumie Surugau, Ping-Chin Lee . Genetic diversity of upland traditional rice varieties in Malaysian Borneo based on mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 3 gene analysis. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 235-246. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021015
  • Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is the fifth most produced cereal crop in the world. The use of sorghum is very diverse and most parts of the plant, including stem, leaves, grain, panicles, stem juice, and bagasse, can be utilized as human food, animal feed, and material for industry and bioenergy production. The collection of local sorghum genetic resources should be explored to identify potential gene sources for the development of superior varieties. This study was conducted to evaluate the production potential of 40 Indonesian sorghum accessions and to further identify potentially useful accessions. Five accessions belonging to cluster 3 had high biomass productivity, including Coley, Keler, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, and Super 1. In particular, Lokal Kaltim and Lao combined high biomass yield with grain yield. Accessions with high biomass has potential for use as feedstock for biomass energy production and forage.



    Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a member of the Poaceae family. The cultivation of sorghum began in ancient Africa around 8000 BC, with the East Sudanian savanna as the center of origin, then spread and became an important food crop in China and India [1]. At present, sorghum is cultivated throughout the world from nutrient-low soils to fertile soils in tropical to temperate areas [2]. Currently, sorghum is the fifth most-produced cereal crop in the world, after corn, rice, wheat, and barley [3]. The area of sorghum cultivation reached 41.75 million ha worldwide, with the largest areas in Sudan (7.5 million ha) and Nigeria (5.7 million ha). The global sorghum production as of 2023 was 59.92 million t with an average productivity of 1.44 t ha-1 [4]. According to the report by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the largest sorghum-producing country is the United States (8.18 million t, followed by Nigeria (6.70 million t), Sudan (5.00 million t), Mexico (4.80 million t) and India (4.40 million t) [4].

    Sorghum can be utilized for various uses. Most parts of the sorghum plant, including stem, leaves, grain, panicles, stem juice, and bagasse, are utilized as human food, animal feed, and material/source for industry and bioenergy production [5,6,7]. Sorghum grains as food have good nutritional value [8,9]. As livestock feed, sorghum produces grains that can be a nutritionally equivalent substitute for corn, as well as dried leaves and stems as good sources of dietary fiber [10]. As industrial raw materials, a certain type of sorghum (sweet sorghum) has been developed for the manufacturing of liquid sugar and syrup [11], beer [12], and ethanol [7,13,14]. The ethanol produced from sweet sorghum can be alternative to fossil fuels [7,14,15], and the bagasse can be utilized for the production of particle boards and bio-pellets [7,16,17].

    Sorghum cropping has the potential to support food and energy programs in Indonesia [9]. The area of sorghum fields in Indonesia was only 26,306 ha in 2012–2013 [18]. The major sorghum-producing areas consist of nine provinces, including East Nusa Tenggara (58.3% of cultivation area), Southeast Sulawesi (15.2%), South Sulawesi (12.9%), East Java (8.4%), and several others (<4%). However, the productivity was not very high at that time, in the range of 1–2 t ha-1 [18]. There is very limited update data on sorghum production and productivity in Indonesia since sorghum is not the priority crop in Indonesia. According to the Press Release of the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of Indonesia, number HM.4.6/412/SET.M. EKON.3/08/2022, the area of sorghum field in Indonesia in 2022 was estimated at 4,335 ha and the sorghum production in six provinces was 15,243 t. The estimation of sorghum productivity in Indonesia was 3.36 t ha-1. To provide enough material for the downstream industries, improving productivity is needed. In addition, sorghum production should be expanded to the marginal lands that are not suitable for the cultivation of ordinary crops in the central and eastern parts of Indonesia to avoid land-use competition between crop commodities [9]. Efficient production of sorghum in such marginal lands requires the selection of accessions with pest and disease resistance or abiotic stress tolerance.

    The main repository for world sorghum germplasm is the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) which is headquartered in India. A total of 39,234 accessions from 93 countries have been recorded by the Institute [19]. In Indonesia, the Agricultural Genebank of the Ministry of Agriculture conserves 259 sorghum accessions collected from local regions in Indonesia or contributed from abroad gene banks and researchers [20]. The collected germplasms are diverse and potentially useful as the source of traits to improve grain yield for food production, biomass yield and quality for fodder production, or stem sugar content, lignin, and cellulose content for industrial application [21,22,23,24,25,26]. In this study, we characterized 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions based on morphological and productive point of view [27], to identify suitable and promising accessions for further utilization. The characteristics analyzed include plant size, biomass production, seed/grain production, and sugar content. These parameters are critical for the performance of sorghum as food, feed, bioenergy feedstock, and other industrial materials. The results of this study will be useful for the government, researchers, farmers, and business/industry sectors in Indonesia and many other countries.

    Cultivation of 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions was conducted from April to August 2017 at Cibinong Science Center and Botanic Gardens of the Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI), which has been changed into National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN). The area is in Bogor Regency of West Java Province of Indonesia, with the altitude of 250 m above sea level. The monthly average minimum and maximum temperature during the research were 22.96 and 31.95 ℃, respectively; the monthly average of air humidity ranged between 76.61% and 85.29%, a monthly average of wind speed was from 1.43 and 5.35 km h-1; and the monthly average rainfall ranged between 179.2 and 401.9 mm [28]. The soil type of the study location was alfisol with the chemical properties shown in Appendix 1.

    We obtained the seeds of 37 Indonesian local sorghum accessions and the seeds of 3 (three) standard sorghum accessions from the Agricultural Genebank of the Ministry of Agriculture in Bogor-West Java, and the sub-genebank in Maros-South Sulawesi, respectively. A complete list of the 40 sorghum accessions used in this study is presented in Appendix 2. We applied a Completely Randomized Design for the study with one plot for each accession of sorghum tested. Plant cultivation was conducted in test plots sized 5 m × 5 m and placed 4 m apart. Each accession of sorghum was cultivated in one plot from a total of forty test plots. Two seeds were sown per hole, with spacing 25 cm in the rows that were 75 cm apart in the plots. The fields were plowed and applied with 10 kg of compost before planting. Urea (150 kg ha-1), triple superphosphate (150 kg ha-1), and potassium chloride (150 kg ha-1) were applied as basal fertilizers at the time of planting, and urea (150 kg ha-1) were applied as top dressing at 1 month after planting.

    Plant growth parameters and production-related parameters were measured. The plant growth parameters were analyzed during the flowering period, including plant height (PH), leaf number (LN), leaf length (LL), leaf width (LW), panicle length (PL), and panicle stalk length (PSL). The production-related parameters were analyzed at harvest, including 100 grain or seed weight (100SW), total grain weight (TSW), panicle weight (PW), fresh and dry weight of plant biomass (FWB and DWB), and sugar content in stem juice (SC). Plant growth parameters, production-related parameters, and sugar content were measured on three randomly selected individuals from each plot. Sugar contents were measured in triplicate by taking juice from the middle part of the stem using the digital refractometer (Minolta, Palette Series, ATAGO Limited Company).

    Obtained data were subjected to descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Posthoc Tukey, and multivariate analysis using Minitab® 19 Software (Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA), including correlation, principal components (PC), and cluster analysis. The PCA-biplot analysis was performed using the Biplot-Excel Program.

    In this study, the 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions were characterized based on multiple growth and production-related parameters. Table 1 shows the degree of association among the parameters estimated by Pearson correlation coefficients, with significant correlation shown in bold letters. In general, plant biomass (FWB and DWB) showed a significant positive correlation between the size-related parameters, including PH, LN, and LL. Positive correlations were also found among grain production-related parameters, including 100SW, TSW, and PW. No significant correlation was found between SC or PSL and other parameters (Table 1). A positive correlation between PH and biomass production (either dried or fresh) has also been reported in previous studies [26,29,30,31,32]. These and the present results together suggest that taller sorghum has a higher capability of biomass production. The relationship may help to identify the genotype suitable for biomass utilization. On the other hand, no clear correlation was found between SC and the other parameters examined in this study, thus additional parameters need to be explored as aids in the selection of sorghum lines suitable for sugar production.

    Table 1.  Correlation of the vegetative and production variables in 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions.
    PH LN LL LW PL PSL 100 SW TSW PW FWB DWB
    LN 0.397*
    LL 0.620** 0.357*
    LW -0.298 0.436** 0.004
    PL 0.430** 0.172 0.289 -0.234
    PSL 0.167 0.146 0.068 -0.070 0.136
    100 SW 0.256 0.181 0.339* -0.083 -0.118 -0.086
    TSW -0.011 0.037 0.239 0.081 -0.278 -0.219 0.648**
    PW 0.007 0.168 0.233 0.127 -0.040 -0.189 0.511** 0.855**
    FWB 0.543** 0.703** 0.456** 0.347* 0.158 0.006 0.224 0.169 0.298
    DWB 0.645** 0.696** 0.535** 0.294 0.152 -0.001 0.229 0.120 0.161 0.916**
    SC 0.290 0.167 0.198 -0.276 0.046 0.230 0.174 0.131 0.120 0.111 0.209
    Note: PH = Plant Height, LN = Leaf Number, LL = Leaf Length, LW = Leaf Width, PL = Panicle Length, PSL = Panicle Stalk Length, 100SW = Weight of 100 Grains, TSW = Total Grain Weight, PW = Panicle Weight, FWB = Fresh Weight of Plant Biomass, DWB = Dry Weight of Plant Biomass, SC = Sugar Content. * and ** significant at p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    A cluster analysis using all measured data separated the 40 accessions into three clusters (Figure 1). The accessions belonging to each cluster are listed in Table 2. Local sorghum accessions from the same origin tended to be placed in the same cluster. Eight accessions from Belu of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province (Butter Ainarup 1 and 2, Butter Bebelit 2, Butter Biara, Butter Krek, Butter Mean, and Butter Nean Reket A and B), and three accessions from Nusa Tenggara Barat province (Lokal Bima 1, 2, and 3) were grouped in cluster 1 (Figure 1). Two out of three accessions of Selayer (Selayer 1 and 3) also belonged to cluster 1 (Figure 1). Cluster 2 mainly consisted of the accessions from Central Java, including five out of six accessions from Demak (Demak 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), Kempul Putih 64 K6, and Kempul Putih 82 R10 (Figure 1). Moreover, almost half of all accessions in cluster 3 were collected from West Java including Coley, Keler, Kolot, and RGV (Figure 1). According to the mean values of the parameters within each group, the accessions in cluster 1 were characterized by lower LW, TSW, and PW compared to those of the members in clusters 2 and 3 (Table 3). The results indicated that the accessions in cluster 1 had smaller sizes of leaves and lower grain production. The accessions in cluster 2 were characterized by higher TSW and PW compared to those of the members in clusters 1 and 3 (Table 3). These results indicated that the accessions in cluster 2 had a higher capacity for grain production. The accessions in cluster 3 were characterized by higher PH, FWB, and DWB compared to those of the members in clusters 1 and 2 (Table 3). The results indicated that the accessions in cluster 3 had a higher capacity for biomass production.

    Figure 1.  Hierarchical clustering analysis of 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions.
    Note: The Dendrogram was constructed by the Ward method of cluster analysis based on Euclidean distances.
    Table 2.  Member of three groups of 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions when mapping the biplot analysis with the cluster analysis.
    No Member of Group 1 Member of Group 2 Member of Group 3
    1 1: Batari 12: Demak 1 (Gajah) 11: Coley
    2 2: Butter Ainarup 1 13: Demak 2 (Gajah) 20: Keler
    3 3: Butter Ainarup 2 14: Demak 3 (Gajah) 24: Kolot
    4 4: Butter Bebelit 2 15: Demak 4 (Mejen) 25: Lao
    5 5: Butter Biara 16: Demak 5 26: Lepeng
    6 6: Butter Krek 19: Kawali 30: Lokal Kaltim
    7 7: Butter Mean 22: Kempul Putih 64 K6 33: RGV
    8 8: Butter Nean Reket A 23: Kempul Putih 82 R10 35: Rumbia (Lokal Lampung)
    9 9: Butter Nean Reket B 32: Nean Reket 39: Super 1
    10 10: Cantel Abrit Wonogiri 37: Selayer 2
    11 17: Demak 6 (Babakan Sari)
    12 18: Hermada Coklat
    13 21: Kempul Putih 62R6
    14 27: Lokal Bima 1
    15 28: Lokal Bima 2
    16 29: Lokal Bima 3
    17 31: Mutiara Kulonprogo L70
    18 34: Rio
    19 36: Selayer 1
    20 38: Selayer 3
    21 40: Super 2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Means of sorghum vegetative and production variables in each cluster.
    Variable Pooled Mean Means in group
    Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
    PH 2582 2625 ± 548 b 1793 ± 366 c 3359 ± 600 a
    LN 8.83 7.94 ± 0.89 b 8.83 ± 1.38 b 10.93 ± 0.91 a
    LL 88.35 86.33 ± 10.10 b 86.12 ± 9.59 b 95.56 ± 6.44 a
    LW 8.338 7.711 ± 1.027 b 9.240 ± 0.650 a 8.796 ± 0.873 a
    PL 424.3 425.6 ± 79.6 ab 354.9 ± 71.9 b 498.4 ± 118.9 a
    PSL 93.38 93.67 ± 35.81 a 78.40 ± 21.00 a 109.3 ± 47.3 a
    100 SW 2.410 2.240 ± 0.426 a 2.548 ± 0.257 a 2.653 ± 0.889 a
    TSW 54.08 45.60 ± 12.07 b 70.48 ± 10.88 a 55.61 ± 22.33 ab
    PW 83.14 68.21 ± 14.65 b 106.07 ± 13.46 a 92.49 ± 26.13 a
    FWB 816.0 696.3 ± 159.1 b 771.1 ± 65.7 b 1145.1 ± 191.1 a
    DWB 258.5 224.7 ± 55.1 b 222.6 ± 36.3 b 377.4 ± 68.5 a
    SC 11.06 11.06 ± 3.38 a 9.89 ± 3.01 a 12.37 ± 2.59 a
    Note: Shown are the mean ± standard deviation of values for the accessions in each cluster. The different letter indicates significant difference between the clusters (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD test). PH = Plant Height, LN = Leaf Number, LL = Leaf Length, LW = Leaf Width, PL = Panicle Length, PSL = Panicle Stalk Length, 100SW = Weight of 100 Grains, TSW = Total Grain Weight, PW = Panicle Weight, FWB = Fresh Weight of Plant Biomass, DWB = Dry Weight of Plant Biomass, SC = Sugar Content.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The improved cultivars included in this study (Super 1, Super 2, and Kawali) were separated into different clusters. The cultivars Super 1 and Super 2 were originally developed as those having higher sugar content [33]. However, the observed variation in SC among the 40 accessions were rather small in this study, thus SC did not become the factor discriminating the cultivars in this study. Rather, they appeared to be separated according to the capacity of biomass production. The cultivars Super 1 and Super 2 produced higher amounts of biomass (FWB and DWB), whose DWB ranked 4th and 7th among the 40 cultivars, respectively.

    The grouping of 40 sorghum accession was further examined by PCA-biplot (Figure 2). The first and second principal component explained 32.4% and 19.6% of the variation in the traits, respectively. The accessions belonging to the same group in the clustering analysis were placed in proximity on the scatterplot. The result supports the validity of the grouping by clustering analysis. The vectors with positive value along the first axis include FWB, DWB, LL, LN, PH, and SC. The vectors with positive value along the second axis include TSW, PW, 100SW, and LW. The vectors with negative value along the second axis include PL and PSL (Figure 2). Thus, the first and the second axis are likely to indicate the capacity for biomass production and grain production, respectively. Hence the cluster 3 can be characterized as the group with high seed production, whereas the cluster 2 is characterized as the group with high seed production but not high biomass production. The members in cluster 1 can be regarded as those with neither high seed production nor high biomass production. The result is in accordance with the characteristics predicted in the clustering analysis (Table 3). Separation of the clusters 2 and 3 on the first axis suggests that most accessions with high potential for grain production are not high in biomass production, as the result of a trade-off between the two traits. The accession 34 (Rio) was placed in cluster 1 by cluster analysis, whereas it was placed closer to those in cluster 2 by PCA-Biplot (Figure 2, Table 2). This accession showed lowest biomass productivity but higher grain productivity among the 40 accessions tested, with DWB and TSW ranked 40th and 4th, respectively. These characteristics may have caused the fluctuation in classification.

    Figure 2.  Biplot analysis of 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions.
    Note: Each of the dots represents an individual accession, with blue, magenta, and green representing the accession belonging to clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

    The results of the analysis of variances of all parameters measured among 40 sorghum accessions were significantly different (Appendixes 3 and 4). Significant higher values of the parameter related to biomass production (FWB and DWB) were found for the accessions Coley, Keler, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, and Super 1 as compared to those of the other accessions (Appendix 4). On the other hand, significantly higher values of the parameter related to grain production (100SW, TSW, PW) were found for the accessions of Demak 1, Demak 2, Demak 3, Demak 4, Demak 5, Kempul Putih 82 R10, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, Nean Reket, and Rio as compared to those of the other accessions (Appendix 4). The accession with a significantly higher value of sugar content (SC) parameters as compared to that of most of the other accessions was Rio accessions (Appendix 4).

    The results of the characterization of 40 Indonesian local sorghum accessions in this study could be utilized for many purposes, including the conservation and maintenance of genetic resources for breeding or future usage. So far, many sorghum germplasm have been collected by the Agricultural Genebank, including cultivars, landraces, and inbred lines with various phenotypes and origins [34]. Sorghum accession with high potential for biomass production is promising as livestock fodder or the material for bioenergy production [7]. The results of this study suggest that the accession with high PH, LN, LL, FWB, and DWB could have a high potential for biomass production (Table 1, Appendix 4). The accessions having such characteristics are Coley, Keler, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, and Super 1 (Figures 1 and 2, Table 2, Appendix 4), with the value of DWB ranging 20.69 t ha-1–25.28 t ha-1. These accessions were placed into cluster 3 based on cluster and PCA-biplot analyses (Figures 1 and 2).

    Potential for grain production is also an important trait in the development of new varieties. Sorghum grains can be utilized not only as food or feed but also as a source of starch for ethanol production [7]. The top ten accessions with high potential for seed production as judged by TSW included Demak 1, Demak 2, Demak 3, Demak 4, Demak 5, Kempul Putih 82 R10, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, Nean Reket, and Rio, with values were 3.72 t ha-1–5.02 t ha-1. The values are comparable with those of improved sorghum varieties released between 1960 and 2001 in Indonesia, including No 46, No 6C, UPCA-S2, UPCA-S1, KD4, Hegari Genjah, Mandau, and Numbu [18]. Most of the high grain producers identified in this study belonged to cluster 2, whereas Lokal Kaltim (ranked 2nd) and Lao (ranked 5th) belonged to cluster 3, which is characterized as high biomass producers (Figures 1 and 2, Table 2, Appendix 4). The DWB of Lokal Kaltim and Lao indeed ranked second and first among the 40 accessions, respectively (Appendix 4). As discussed above, there appears to be a trade-off between the production of biomass and grain in general (Figure 2), whereas these accessions exhibited high potential in both aspects.

    The 40 local sorghum accessions could be classified into 3 groups based on their biomass and seed productivity. The clustering tends to reflect the provenance of the accessions. Five accessions belonging to cluster 3 had high biomass productivity and appeared to be promising for use as feedstock for biomass energy production and forage, or as parent lines for further improvement by breeding. The accessions include Coley, Keler, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, and Super 1. On the other hand, 10 accessions in cluster 2 could be utilized for seed production application, i.e. Demak 1, Demak 2, Demak 3, Demak 4, Demak 5, Kempul Putih 82 R10, Lao, Lokal Kaltim, Nean Reket, and Rio. Lokal Kaltim and Lao are particularly promising in that they combine high biomass yield with grain yield. The identification of genes associated with these agronomically useful traits using these lines will help in the selection of superior genotypes. Further studies on the characteristics of plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses of the plants are also required.

    The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This research was supported by DIPA funding of Research Center for Plant Conservation and Botanic Gardens-LIPI/BRIN, Indonesia and SATREPS-JICA, Japan. The authors thank all colleagues who support this research especially the fieldwork. Acknowledgment is also addressed to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia for providing sorghum seeds in this research.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    Table 1.  Results of Soil Analysis prior to the study.
    No Parameter Method Unit Result Catagory
    1 Organic C Walkey & Black/
    Gravimetry
    % 2.08–3.28 Medium-high
    2 Total N Kjeldahl % 0.16–0.26 Low-medium
    3 C/N ratio Calculation - 9–17 Low-high
    4 Available P2O5 Bray/Olsen ppm 8.83–256.8 Low-very high
    5 Available K2O Bray/Olsen ppm 7.68–450.54 Very low-very high
    6 Cation exchange capacity N NH4OAc cmol/kg 8.17–10.65 Low
    7 Soil water content Gravimetry % 9.29–18.1 -
    8 pH (H2O) Potentiometry - 5.31–6.18 Acid-rather acid
    9 Soil texture Pipette % Clay
    Sand 8.58–30.89
    Silt 15.73–34.11
    Clay 46.03–66.9

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  The list of Indonesian sorghum accession used in the study.
    No Accession name Accession status Provenance
    1 Batari Traditional cultivar Kendari district of Southeast Sulawesi Province
    2 Butter Ainarup 1 Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    3 Butter Ainarup 2 Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    4 Butter Bebelit 2 Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    5 Butter Biara Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    6 Butter Krek Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    7 Butter Mean Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    8 Butter Nean Reket A Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    9 Butter Nean Reket B Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    10 Cantel Abrit Wonogiri Traditional cultivar Wonogiri district of Central Java Province
    11 Coley Traditional cultivar West Java Province
    12 Demak 1 (Gajah) Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    13 Demak 2 (Gajah) Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    14 Demak 3 (Gajah) Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    15 Demak 4 (Mejen) Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    16 Demak 5 Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    17 Demak 6 (Babakan Sari) Traditional cultivar Demak district, Central Java Province
    18 Hermada Coklat Traditional cultivar Bogor district, West Java Province
    19 Kawali Improved cultivar By Ministry of Agriculture in Maros district, South Sulawesi Province
    20 Keler Traditional cultivar West Java Province
    21 Kempul Putih 62R6 Traditional cultivar Central Java Province
    22 Kempul Putih 64 K6 Traditional cultivar Central Java Province
    23 Kempul Putih 82 R10 Traditional cultivar Central Java Province
    24 Kolot Traditional cultivar Garut district of West Java Province
    25 Lao Traditional cultivar Paser district of East Kalimantan Province
    26 Lepeng Traditional cultivar Manggarai district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    27 Lokal Bima 1 Traditional cultivar Bima district of Nusa Tenggara Barat Province
    28 Lokal Bima 2 Traditional cultivar Bima district of Nusa Tenggara Barat Province
    29 Lokal Bima 3 Traditional cultivar Bima district, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    30 14 Lokal Kaltim Traditional cultivar East Kalimantan Province
    31 Mutiara Kulonprogo L70 Traditional cultivar Kulonprogo district of Yogyakarta Province
    32 Nean Reket Traditional cultivar Belu district of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province
    33 RGV Traditional cultivar West Java Province
    34 Rio Traditional cultivar West Java Province
    35 Rumbia (Lokal Lampung) Traditional cultivar Lampung Province
    36 Selayer 1 Traditional cultivar South Sulawesi Province
    37 Selayer 2 Traditional cultivar South Sulawesi Province
    38 Selayer 3 Traditional cultivar South Sulawesi Province
    39 Super 1 Improved cultivar By Ministry of Agriculture in Maros district, South Sulawesi Province
    40 Super 2 Improved cultivar Ministry of Agriculture in Maros district, South Sulawesi Province

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Plant Height (PH) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 653906 16767 16.71 0.000
    Error 80 80249 1003
    Total 119 734155

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Leaf Number (LN) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 287.33 7.3675 8.75 0.000
    Error 80 67.33 0.8417
    Total 119 354.67

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Leaf Length (LL) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 11404 292.40 9.93 0.000
    Error 80 2355 29.44
    Total 119 13759

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6.  Leaf Width (LW) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 147.95 3.7937 5.14 0.000
    Error 80 59.01 0.7376
    Total 119 206.96

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 7.  Panicle Length (PL) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 11523 295.46 13.05 0.000
    Error 80 1811 22.64
    Total 119 13334

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8.  Panicle Stalk Length (PSL) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 1560.7 40.02 3.72 0.000
    Error 80 860.5 10.76
    Total 119 2421.2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 9.  Weight of 100 Seeds (100SW) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 3563 91.37 6.04 0.000
    Error 80 1210 15.12
    Total 119 4773

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 10.  Total Seed Weight (TSW) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 36567 937.6 3.67 0.000
    Error 80 20436 255.5
    Total 119 57003

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 11.  Panicle Weight (PW) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 66321 1700.5 4.82 0.000
    Error 80 28224 352.8
    Total 119 94545

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 12.  Fresh Weight Biomass (FWB) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 6397365 164035 5.91 0.000
    Error 80 2220662 27758
    Total 119 8618027

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 13.  Dry Weight Biomass (DWB) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 822279 21084 4.73 0.000
    Error 80 356944 4462
    Total 119 1179223

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 14.  Sugar Content of Stem Juice (SC) Parameter.
    Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
    Accession No 39 1178.1 30.207 5.90 0.000
    Error 80 409.8 5.122
    Total 119 1587.9

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 15.  The parameters of plant height (PH), leaf number (LN), leaf length (LL) and leaf width (LW).
    Accession No Accession name PH (cm) LN LL (cm) LW (cm)
    1 Batari 216.7 ± 5.77 fghijklmn 7.33 ± 0.6 efg 89.0 ± 5.6 abcdefghi 8.2 ± 0.7 abcdefg
    2 Butter Ainarup 1 185.0 ± 39.1 ijklmn 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 71.7 ± 1.5 ij 9.8 ± 0.3 abc
    3 Butter Ainarup 2 151.7 ± 12.6 mn 8.00 ± 1.0 defg 77.7 ± 3.8 hij 9.9 ± 0.9 abc
    4 Butter Bebelit 2 308.3 ± 5.77 abcdefg 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 86.3 ± 4.0 defghi 7.8 ± 0.7 abcdefg
    5 Butter Biara 306.7 ± 7.64 abcdefg 6.33 ± 0.6 g 87.7 ± 0.8 cdefghi 7.5 ± 0.5 bcdefg
    6 Butter Krek 316.7 ± 7.64 abcdef 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 92.2± 5.6 abcdefgh 7.2 ± 0.8 cdefg
    7 Butter Mean 286.7 ± 32.1 bcdefghi 7.67 ± 0.6 defg 88.2 ± 1.8 bcdefghi 6.9 ± 1.1 defg
    8 Butter Nean Reket A 250.0 ± 77.0 defghijklm 8.00 ± 1.0 defg 83.3 ± 4.2 efghi 9.3 ± 1.2 abcde
    9 Butter Nean Reket B 290.0 ± 10.0 bcdefgh 7.67 ± 0.6 defg 84.3 ± 5.7 efghi 8.1 ± 0.7 abcdefg
    10 Cantel Abrit Wonogiri 296.7 ± 5.77 abcdefgh 9.67 ± 1.2 abcdef 85.7 ± 8.4 efghi 7.7 ± 1.4 abcdefg
    11 Coley 281.7 ± 128 bcdefghij 11.3 ±1.2 abc 87.7 ± 13.6 cdefghi 9.3 ± 0.3 abcde
    12 Demak 1 (Gajah) 138.7 ± 9.02 n 8.33 ± 1.2 cdefg 89.0 ± 4.4 abcdefghi 10.2 ± 0.8 ab
    13 Demak 2 (Gajah) 154.3 ± 2.89 mn 8.00 ± 0.0 defg 75.7 ± 1.2 hij 9.7 ± 0.3 abcd
    14 Demak 3 (Gajah) 178.3 ± 4.73 jklmn 7.00 ± 1.0 fg 83.2 ± 7.1 efghi 9.0 ± 0.5 abcdef
    15 Demak 4 (Mejen) 195.0 ± 5.00 hijklmn 7.67 ± 0.6 defg 97.7 ± 1.5 abcdef 9.2 ± 0.7 abcde
    16 Demak 5 149.3 ± 22.5 mn 8.00 ± 0.0 defg 77.7 ± 6.8 hij 9.6 ± 1.5 abcd
    17 Demak 6 (Babakan Sari) 236.7 ± 2.89 defghijklmn 7.33 ± 0.6 efg 79.7 ± 6.1 ghij 7.2 ± 0.4 cdefg
    18 Hermada Coklat 275.0 ± 52.0 cdefghijk 7.67 ± 0.6 defg 105.3 ± 4.7 abc 7.4 ± 0.6 bcdefg
    19 Kawali 176.3 ± 19.5 klmn 11.3 ± 1.5 abc 86.2 ± 8.4 defghi 8.0 ± 0.5 abcdefg
    20 Keler 323.3 ± 67.9 abcde 9.67 ± 1.5 abcdef 90.8 ± 12 abcdefgh 8.0 ± 0.0 abcdefg
    21 Kempul Putih 62R6 223.3 ± 2.89 efghijklmn 7.00 ± 1.0 fg 80.7 ± 3.1 fghi 6.9 ± 0.5 defg
    22 Kempul Putih 64 K6 161.0 ± 4.00 lmn 10.3 ± 0.6 abcde 85.8 ± 1.6 efghi 9.7 ± 0.6 abcd
    23 Kempul Putih 82 R10 211.7 ± 15.3 ghijklmn 8.67 ± 1.2 bcdefg 106.2 ± 5.8 a 9.0 ± 1.7 abcdef
    24 Kolot 380.0 ± 20.0 ab 10.3 ± 0.6 abcde 97.7 ± 3.5 abcdef 8.6 ± 0.4 abcdefg
    25 Lao 400.0 ± 34.6 a 11.7 ± 2.1 ab 96.7 ± 3.8 abcdefg 9.3 ± 1.8 abcde
    26 Lepeng 376.7 ± 35.1 abc 12.7 ± 1.5 a 96.7 ± 8.0 abcdefg 9.3 ± 0.6 abcde
    27 Lokal Bima 1 315.0 ± 5.00 abcdefg 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 97.3 ± 6.7 abcdefg 7.4 ± 0.7 bcdefg
    28 Lokal Bima 2 311.6 ± 10.4 abcdefg 8.00 ± 0.0 defg 98.7 ± 3.2 abcde 6.6 ± 0.4 efg
    29 Lokal Bima 3 308.3 ± 2.89 abcdefg 8.33 ± 0.6 cdefg 96.7 ± 0.6 abcdefg 8.0 ± 0.0 abcdefg
    30 14 Lokal Kaltim 396.7 ± 5.77 a 10.3 ± 0.6 abcde 104.0 ± 3.6 abcd 8.2 ± 0.3 abcdefg
    31 Mutiara Kulonprogo L70 177.7 ± 14.2 jklmn 7.00 ± 1.0 fg 62.3 ± 4.9 j 6.2 ± 1.1 fg
    32 Nean Reket 263.3 ± 5.77 defghijkl 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 82.8 ± 3.3 efghi 8.4 ± 1.1 abcdefg
    33 RGV 218.3 ± 5.77 fghijklmn 11.3 ± 1.5 abc 88.8 ± 1.3 abcdefghi 10.4 ± 0.8 a
    34 Rio 168.3 ± 7.64 lmn 6.33 ± 0.6 g 72.7 ± 6.7 ij 6.0 ± 0.9 g
    35 Rumbia (Lokal Lampung) 331.7 ± 14.43 abcd 10.3 ± 1.2 abcde 91.7 ± 2.9 abcdefgh 7.6 ± 0.9 abcdefg
    36 Selayer 1 276.7 ± 15.28 bcdefghijk 7.67 ± 0.6 defg 91.0 ± 4.6 abcdefgh 7.5 ± 0.4 bcdefg
    37 Selayer 2 165.0 ± 13.23 lmn 10.3 ± 1.2 abcde 77.0 ± 4.6 hij 9.7 ± 1.0 abcd
    38 Selayer 3 291.7 ± 7.64 bcdefgh 8.67 ± 0.6 bcdefg 95.7 ± 4.0 abcdefg 8.2 ± 0.7 abcdefg
    39 Super 1 315.0 ± 0.0 abcdefg 10.7 ± 0.6 abcd 106.0 ± 1.0 ab 8.4 ± 0.5 abcdefg
    40 Super 2 320.0 ± 45.8 abcdef 9.33 ± 0.6 bcdefg 87.0 ± 6.1 defghi 7.8 ± 1.6 abcdefg
    Note: Shown are the mean ± standard deviation of values for each accession. The different letter indicates significant difference between the accessions (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD test).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 16.  The parameters of panicle length (PL), panicle stalk length (PSL), 100 seeds weight (100SW) and total seed weight (TSW).
    Accession No Accession name PL (cm) PSL (cm) 100SW (g) TSW (g)
    1 Batari 57.2 ± 7.0 bc 12 ± 6.2 abcde 25.6 ± 0.6 bcdefg 57.2 ± 4.4 abc
    2 Butter Ainarup 1 33.9 ± 2.4 ijklm 5.8 ± 0.7 cde 18.8 ± 2.2 defg 20.3 ± 7.7 c
    3 Butter Ainarup 2 34.4 ± 4.5 ijklm 12 ± 3.7 abcde 18.1 ± 6.1 defg 33.9 ± 10.2 bc
    4 Butter Bebelit 2 37.6 ± 5.3 fghijklm 9.1 ± 1.1 bcde 28.9 ± 4.5 abcdef 49.9 ± 10.1 abc
    5 Butter Biara 44.3 ± 4.5 bcdefghijkl 7.4 ± 2.9 bcde 17.6 ± 1.3 defg 41.5 ± 12.3 abc
    6 Butter Krek 42.3 ± 1.3 cdefghijklm 4.0 ± 0.3 e 22.8 ± 1.0 bcdefg 53.9 ± 8.0 abc
    7 Butter Mean 44.1 ± 6.6 bcdefghijkl 9.6 ± 4.8 bcde 21.9 ± 0.5 cdefg 33.0 ± 12.6 bc
    8 Butter Nean Reket A 29.6 ± 1.7 lm 6.9 ± 1.4 cde 15.0 ± 1.7 g 43.2 ± 6.9 abc
    9 Butter Nean Reket B 41.2 ± 1.6 defghijklm 12 ± 1.9 abcde 20.7 ± 0.4 cdefg 51.2 ± 6.5 abc
    10 Cantel Abrit Wonogiri 34.8 ± 1.6 ijklm 12 ± 1.8 abcde 24.9 ± 2.0 bcdefg 42.2 ± 4.5 abc
    11 Coley 44.6 ± 3.3 bcdefghijkl 16 ± 0.9 abc 15.8 ± 1.8 g 36.8 ± 5.5 bc
    12 Demak 1 (Gajah) 28.3 ± 2.3 m 5.9 ± 2.2 cde 24.4 ± 1.2 bcdefg 76.5 ± 9.7 ab
    13 Demak 2 (Gajah) 32.4 ± 0.8 klm 8.1 ± 1.1 bcde 25.9 ± 1.1 bcdefg 72.9 ± 18.3 abc
    14 Demak 3 (Gajah) 33.0 ± 2.8 jklm 6.9 ± 2.2 cde 26.7 ± 3.0 bcdefg 70.7 ± 10.6 abc
    15 Demak 4 (Mejen) 31.7 ± 1.9 klm 11 ± 2.0 abcde 24.0 ± 1.0 bcdefg 72.2 ± 16.2 abc
    16 Demak 5 33.6 ± 1.5 jklm 7.2 ± 1.4 cde 29.9 ± 2.4 abcd 69.8 ± 24.0 abc
    17 Demak 6 (Babakan Sari) 45.2 ± 7.6 bcdefghijkl 21 ± 6.1 a 20.2 ± 1.0 cdefg 32.4 ± 4.9 bc
    18 Hermada Coklat 58.0 ± 8.6 b 8.1 ± 0.4 bcde 24.0 ± 3.6 bcdefg 49.6 ± 5.4 abc
    19 Kawali 30.2 ± 1.4 lm 8.3 ± 1.7 bcde 26.8 ± 7.9 bcdefg 56.6 ± 36.8 abc
    20 Keler 76.7 ± 3.0 a 6.2 ± 0.9 cde 18.3 ± 2.8 defg 30.7 ± 4.0 bc
    21 Kempul Putih 62R6 35.1 ± 4.1 ijklm 11 ± 3.1 abcde 26.9 ± 1.1 bcdefg 46.5 ± 7.0 abc
    22 Kempul Putih 64 K6 36.3 ± 1.3 hijklm 7.5 ± 1.5 bcde 19.8 ± 1.6 cdefg 58.9 ± 16.9 abc
    23 Kempul Putih 82 R10 35.2 ± 2.1 ijklm 7.3 ± 3.3 bcde 26.0 ± 2.3 bcdefg 73.7 ± 23.8 ab
    24 Kolot 51.0 ± 6.0 bcdefgh 7.2 ± 2.9 cde 28.9 ± 7.9 abcdef 62.4 ± 18.0 abc
    25 Lao 42.5 ± 9.0 bcdefghijklm 5.3 ± 0.9 de 30.3 ± 10.5 abcd 74.6 ± 19.1 ab
    26 Lepeng 52.4 ± 0.7 bcdefg 18 ± 1.6 ab 17.0 ± 3.3 efg 44.4 ± 6.0 abc
    27 Lokal Bima 1 48.7 ± 2.1 bcdefghij 5.7 ± 1.9 cde 23.8 ± 2.3 bcdefg 64.4 ± 3.4 abc
    28 Lokal Bima 2 49.4 ± 1.2 bcdefghi 9.6 ± 4.1 bcde 23.7 ± 2.5 bcdefg 52.6 ± 26.2 abc
    29 Lokal Bima 3 53.0 ± 3.9 bcdef 7.7 ± 2.4 bcde 21.9 ± 1.1 cdefg 45.4 ± 46.7 abc
    30 14 Lokal Kaltim 38.2 ± 1.7 defghijklm 8.2 ± 1.9 bcde 40.7 ± 2.3 a 94.0 ± 13.7 a
    31 Mutiara Kulonprogo L70 38.9 ± 2.3 efghijklm 5.6 ± 1.2 cde 16.7 ± 3.4 fg 41.2 ± 5.0 bc
    32 Nean Reket 40.7 ± 4.8 defghijklm 12 ± 1.2 abcde 25.5 ± 9.3 bcdefg 94.2 ± 9.1 a
    33 RGV 51.0 ± 7.9 bcdefgh 9.8 ± 7.5 bcde 20.6 ± 0.6 cdefg 27.1 ± 8.2 bc
    34 Rio 41.1 ± 4.6 defghijklm 7.7 ± 0.8 bcde 23.2 ± 3.0 bcdefg 75.5 ± 12.7 ab
    35 Rumbia (Lokal Lampung) 55.1 ± 9.2 bcd 16 ± 3.5 abcd 35.3 ± 1.7 ab 63.6 ± 19.3 abc
    36 Selayer 1 46.8 ± 6.8 bcdefghijk 12 ± 10.1 abcde 28.8 ± 2.1 abcdef 41.0 ± 17.9 bc
    37 Selayer 2 53.5 ± 5.2 bcde 4.8 ± 0.8 e 25.8 ± 7.7 bcdefg 59.4 ± 17.5 abc
    38 Selayer 3 46.1 ± 8.1 bcdefghijk 11 ± 5.0 abcde 16.9 ± 0.3 fg 33.6 ± 22.2 bc
    39 Super 1 37.2 ± 5.5 ghijklm 12 ± 3.4 abcde 31.7 ± 0.4 abc 66.9 ± 6.9 abc
    40 Super 2 32.0 ± 5.3 klm 7.7 ± 1.7 bcde 29.8 ± 6.5 abcde 49.3 ± 6.9 abc
    Note: Shown are the mean ± standard deviation of values for each accession. The different letter indicates significant difference between the accessions (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD test).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 17.  The parameters of panicle weight (PW), fresh weight of plant biomass (FWB), dry weight of plant biomass (100SW) and sugar content of stem juice (SC).
    Accession No Accession name PW (g) FWB (g) DWB (g) SC (°Brix)
    1 Batari 54.7 ± 4.1 cdef 531.9 ± 68.6 fg 186.5 ± 24 def 11.5 ± 1.0 bcdefg
    2 Butter Ainarup 1 49.5 ± 5.88 f 626.6 ± 11.6 defg 217.0 ± 23 cdef 12.5 ± 3.9 abcdef
    3 Butter Ainarup 2 51.8 ± 14.12 ef 684.2 ± 74.6 defg 215.6 ± 26.7 cdef 7.1 ± 1.6 cdefg
    4 Butter Bebelit 2 71.5 ± 10.56 bcdef 672.5 ± 102.6 defg 247.0 ± 15.9 bcdef 12.4 ± 1.5 abcdef
    5 Butter Biara 60.3 ± 13.49 cdef 528.8 ± 80.1 fg 194.0 ± 39.9 cdef 6.3 ± 2.2 efg
    6 Butter Krek 76.3 ± 5.84 abcdef 733.6 ± 123.3 cdefg 285.0 ± 85.2 abcdef 12.9 ± 3.2 abcdef
    7 Butter Mean 51.1 ± 14.73 ef 516.9 ± 65.8 fg 175.9 ± 4.63 def 11.7 ± 1.0 bcdefg
    8 Butter Nean Reket A 67.2 ± 9.13 bcdef 940.6 ± 117.1 abcdefg 307.1 ± 34.9 abcdef 10.1 ± 3.4 bcdefg
    9 Butter Nean Reket B 76.0 ± 11.43 abcdef 671.5 ± 122.7 defg 226.1 ± 39.3 cdef 14.0 ± 3.0 abcd
    10 Cantel Abrit Wonogiri 71.1 ± 6.83 bcdef 981.3 ± 67.8 abcdefg 231.8 ± 26.2 bcdef 4.6 ± 1.5 g
    11 Coley 59.3 ± 8.33 cdef 1269 ± 208 abc 388.0 ± 82.8 abcd 12.9 ± 2.2 abcdef
    12 Demak 1 (Gajah) 116.5 ± 8.87 abcd 748.0 ± 187 cdefg 243.3 ± 48.4 bcdef 6.3 ± 0.2 efg
    13 Demak 2 (Gajah) 98.8 ± 2.82 abcdef 749.5 ± 69.6 cdefg 193.5 ± 30.8 cdef 8.9 ± 1.6 bcdefg
    14 Demak 3 (Gajah) 103.3 ± 9.0 abcdef 788.5 ± 84.5 cdefg 239.5 ± 37.9 bcdef 11.8 ± 1.4 bcdefg
    15 Demak 4 (Mejen) 106.3 ± 19.7 abcdef 793.0 ± 134.4 cdefg 228.2 ± 51.8 bcdef 11.0 ± 0.1 bcdefg
    16 Demak 5 103.7 ± 22.9 abcdef 884 ± 287 abcdefg 177.5 ± 27.9 def 7.0 ± 1.4 cdefg
    17 Demak 6 (Babakan Sari) 54.6 ± 3.05 def 513.8 ± 9.03 fg 155.3 ± 1.50 ef 13.2 ± 0.8 abcdef
    18 Hermada Coklat 88.9 ± 6.7 abcdef 737.0 ± 181 cdefg 227.1 ± 33.3 bcdef 8.6 ± 1.3 bcdefg
    19 Kawali 81.8 ± 50.5 abcdef 675.0 ± 175 defg 231.7 ± 91.8 bcdef 15.0 ± 2.1 ab
    20 Keler 102.7 ± 0.8 abcdef 1360 ± 102 a 407.9 ± 19.9 abc 11.5 ± 0.6 bcdefg
    21 Kempul Putih 62R6 71.9 ± 7.7 bcdef 743.8 ± 84.7 cdefg 228.9 ± 34.5 bcdef 12.4 ± 2.4 abcdef
    22 Kempul Putih 64 K6 101.5 ± 15.9 abcdef 787.6 ± 33.5 cdefg 219.1 ± 21.9 cdef 13.1 ± 0.9 abcdef
    23 Kempul Putih 82 R10 111.9 ± 26.0 abcde 799.6 ± 119.5 bcdefg 254.5 ± 72.1 abcdef 10.9 ± 3.6 bcdefg
    24 Kolot 99.1 ± 7.76 abcdef 1053 ± 82.9 abcdef 313.4 ± 42.6 abcdef 12.1 ± 2.4 abcdefg
    25 Lao 97.9 ± 2.8 abcdef 1348 ± 522 ab 474.0 ± 229 a 10.8 ± 1.5 bcdefg
    26 Lepeng 90.7 ± 19.9 abcdef 1109 ± 69 abcde 365.3 ± 23 abcde 15.4 ± 1.4 ab
    27 Lokal Bima 1 78.4 ± 14.8 abcdef 861.0 ± 312 abcdefg 283.4 ± 114 abcdef 13.3 ± 3.7 abcde
    28 Lokal Bima 2 79.8 ± 24.4 abcdef 653.3 ± 29.4 defg 201.1 ± 21.5 cdef 8.8 ± 3.5 bcdefg
    29 Lokal Bima 3 69.5 ± 43.9 bcdef 757.9 ± 65.1 cdefg 233.0 ± 30.3 bcdef 11.9 ± 1.3 abcdefg
    30 14 Lokal Kaltim 128.3 ± 11.30 ab 1265 ± 60.8 abc 447.0 ± 60.2 ab 14.0 ± 4.1 abcd
    31 Mutiara Kulonprogo L70 66.1 ± 2.46 cdef 556.3 ± 27.8 fg 155.8 ± 12.5 ef 5.7 ± 1.4 fg
    32 Nean Reket 134.3 ± 18.2 a 821.6 ± 167.8 abcdefg 278.6 ± 39 abcdef 9.0 ± 1.1 bcdefg
    33 RGV 44.4 ± 9.5 f 914.0 ± 178 abcdefg 360.6 ± 70.2 abcde 6.6 ± 3.1 defg
    34 Rio 112.3 ± 13.5 abcde 461.6 ± 41.8 g 117.3 ± 15.1 f 19.3 ± 1.6 a
    35 Rumbia (Lokal Lampung) 116.7 ± 30.7 abc 812.4 ± 125.3 abcdefg 245.1 ± 54.2 bcdef 14.0 ± 1.5 abcd
    36 Selayer 1 62.7 ± 19.8 cdef 611.8 ± 59.8 efg 217.0 ± 61 cdef 10.3 ± 2.0 bcdefg
    37 Selayer 2 102.6 ± 25.1 abcdef 663.8 ± 126.6 defg 159.6 ± 28 ef 5.9 ± 3.7 efg
    38 Selayer 3 60.0 ± 20.3 cdef 823.7 ± 71.9 abcdefg 252.4 ± 22.3 bcdef 11.4 ± 3.6 bcdefg
    39 Super 1 93.6 ± 7.54 abcdef 1176.5 ± 171.4 abcd 394.7 ± 92.5 abcd 14.1 ± 1.1 abcd
    40 Super 2 59.1 ± 18.8 cdef 1016 ± 469 abcdef 361.0 ± 190 abcde 14.3 ± 2.2 abc
    Note: Shown are the mean ± standard deviation of values for each accession. The different letter indicates significant difference between the accessions (p < 0.05, Tukey HSD test).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV


    [1] Venkateswaran K, Elangovan M, Sivaraj N (2019) Origin, domestication and diffusion of Sorghum bicolor, In: Aruna C, Visarada, Bhat BV, Tonapi VA (Eds.), Breeding sorghum for diverse end uses, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 15–31.
    [2] POWO (2021) Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Available from: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn: lsid: ipni.org: names: 422090-1.
    [3] Upadhyaya HD, Vetriventhan M, Asiri AM, et al. (2019) Multi-Trait diverse germplasm sources from mini core collection for sorghum improvement. Agriculture 9: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060121 doi: 10.3390/agriculture9060121
    [4] USDA (2024) World Agricultural Production. Office of Global Analysis, FAS, USDA. Available from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf.
    [5] Sirappa MP (2003) Prospect of sorghum development in Indonesia as alternative commodity for food, feed stock and industry (in Indonesian). J Litbang Pertanian 22: 133–140.
    [6] Rachmadiyanto AR, Magandhi M, Lestari R (2018) Farmers perception in Kabupaten Belu (NTT) against the potential of cultivation sorghum (in Indonesian). Proceeding National Seminar: Develop the independence of Indonesian farmer corporation toward sustainable food sovereignty, 115–121.
    [7] Dahlberg J (2019) The role of sorghum in renewables and biofuels. In: Zhao ZY, Dahlberg J (Eds.), Sorghum. Methods in molecular biology, New York: Humana Press, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9039-9_19
    [8] Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (1992) The list of foodstuffs composition. Jakarta: Bhratara.
    [9] Subagio H, Aqil M (2014) Breeding and development of superior variety of sorghum for food, feed stock and bioenergy (in Indonesian). Iptek Tanaman Pangan 9: 39–51.
    [10] Etuk EB, Ifeduba AV, Okata UE, et al. (2012) Nutrient composition and feeding value of sorghum for livestock and poultry: A review. J Anim Sci Adv 2: 510–524.
    [11] Dattamazumdar S, Poshadri A, Rao SP, et al. (2012) Innovative use of sweet sorghum juice in the beverage industry. IFRJ 19: 1361–1366.
    [12] Palmer GH, Etokakpan OU, Igyor MA (1989) Sorghum as brewing material. MIRCEN J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 5: 265–275.
    [13] Gurden B, Erdurmus C, Erdal S, et al. (2020) Evaluation of sweet sorghum genotypes for bioethanol yield and related traits. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 15: 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2169 doi: 10.1002/bbb.2169
    [14] Mathur S, Umakanth AV, Tanopi VA, et al. (2017) Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: Recent advances and availability resources. Biotechnol Biofuels 10: 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0834-9 doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0834-9
    [15] Umakanth AV, Kumar AA, Vermerris W, et al. (2019) Sweet sorghum for biofuel industry, In: Aruna C, Visarada, Bhat BV, et al. (Eds.), Breeding sorghum for diverse end uses, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 255–270.
    [16] Kusumah SS, Umemura K, Yoshioka K, et al. (2016) Utilization of sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid for manufacturing of particleboard I: Effects of pre-drying treatment and citric acid content on the board properties. Ind Crops Prod 84: 34–42.
    [17] Wiloso EI, Setiawan AAR, Prasetia H, et al. (2020) Production of sorghum pellets for electricity generation in Indonesia: A life cycle assessment. Biofuel Res J 7: 1178.
    [18] Subagio H, Suryawati (2013) Production area and the diversity utilization of sorghum in Indonesia (in Indonesian), In: Sumarno, Darmardjati DJ, Syam M, Hermanto (Eds.), Sorghum, Technology innovation and development, Jakarta: IAARD Press, 24–37.
    [19] Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Vetriventhan M, et al. (2017) Status, genetic diversity and gaps in sorghum germplasm from South Asia conserved at ICRISAT genebank. Plant Gen Res: 15: 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147926211600023X doi: 10.1017/S147926211600023X
    [20] Risilawati A, Kurniawan H, Sohan M, et al. (2017) Development of sorghum core collection based on phenotypic traits in ICABIOGRAD Genebank. Proceeding of International Seminar of Indonesia Plant Breeding Science Society (PERIPI), 50–57.
    [21] Dahlberg J, Wolfrum E, Bean B, et al. (2011) Compositional and agronomic evaluation of sorghum biomass as a potential feedstock for renewable fuels. JBMB 5: 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2011.1171 doi: 10.1166/jbmb.2011.1171
    [22] Fracasso A, Magnanini E, Marocco A, et al. (2017) Real time determination of Photosynthesis, Transpiration, Water-Use Efficiency and Gene Expression of Two Sorghum bicolor (Moench) genotypes subjected to dry down. Front Plant Sci 8: 932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00932 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00932
    [23] Bilodeau M, Brenner D (1999) Theory of multivariate statistics. New York: Spinger.
    [24] Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, et al. (2011) Cluster analysis, 5 Eds., London: John Wiley & Sons.
    [25] Gabriel KR (1971) The Biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467.
    [26] Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2007) Applied multivariat statistical analysis, 6 Eds., New Jersey: Printice Hall.
    [27] Perazzo A, Carvalho G, Santos E, et al. (2014) Agronomic evaluation of 32 sorghum cultivars in the Brazilian semi-arid region. R Bra Zootec 43: 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000500002 doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982014000500002
    [28] BMKG/Indonesian Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysical Agency (2018) Climate Data: Data online. Pusat Database BMKG. Available from: http://dataonline.bmkg.go.id/home.
    [29] Erdumus C, Erdal S, Oten M, et al. (2021) Investigation of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) genotypes for yield and yield components. MAYDICA 66: 22.
    [30] Prakash R, Ganesamurthy K, Nirmalakumari A, et al. (2010) Correlation and path analysis in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). EJPB 1: 315–318.
    [31] Warkad YN, Tidke RT, Maske NM, et al. (2010). Character association and path analysis in sorghum[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Int J Agric Sci 6: 100–104.
    [32] Girish G, Kiran SB, Lokesh R, et al. (2016) Character association and path analysis in advanced breeding lines of rabi sorghum[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. J Appl Nat Sci 8: 35–39.
    [33] Pabendon MB, Efendi R, Santoso SB, et al. (2017) Varieties of sweet sorghum Super-1 and Super-2 and its equipment for bioethanol in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 65: 012054.
    [34] Motlhaodi T, Geleta M, Chite S, et al. (2017) Genetic diversity in sorghum[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm from Southern Africa as revealed by microsatellite markers and agro-morphological traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64: 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0388-x doi: 10.1007/s10722-016-0388-x
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Dewi Rumbaina Mustikawati, Junita Barus, Ratna Wylis Arief, Etia Sari Girsang, Niluh Putu Sri Ratmini, SORGHUM AND ECO-FRIENDLY AGRICULTURE IN INDONESIA, 2024, 12, 2764-4170, e3807, 10.55908/sdgs.v12i7.3807
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1511) PDF downloads(168) Cited by(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog