Ethical consumerism has been on the rise since the early 1900s; thus, increasing discerning consumers. Consumers place greater importance on intangible attributes such as the origin and societal and environmental impacts of the products. Studies focus on agricultural niche marketing in the South African and sub-Saharan context, but none focus on niche markets within the South African sheep wool industry. In this study, we investigated the niche market for local, handmade and socially responsible wool products in South Africa. Our methodology included interviews, a choice-based conjoint analysis and a multinomial logit model. The results revealed that South African high-income consumers preferred locally produced wool products over imported wool products. This was followed by consumers' preferring handmade over machine-made products as well as socially responsible wool products over those that provided no information on social responsibility. The existence of a niche market in South Africa was demonstrated when consumers preferred ethical wool products. We defined consumers' demographic and psychographic factors for a niche market. The findings can assist the South African wool industry and small-scale woolgrowers to identify niche markets for wool products by considering intangible attributes.
Citation: Michelle Marais, Henry Jordaan, Willem Abraham Lombard, Yonas T. Bahta. Assessing the potential of a niche market for wool products in South Africa[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 108-128. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024007
Ethical consumerism has been on the rise since the early 1900s; thus, increasing discerning consumers. Consumers place greater importance on intangible attributes such as the origin and societal and environmental impacts of the products. Studies focus on agricultural niche marketing in the South African and sub-Saharan context, but none focus on niche markets within the South African sheep wool industry. In this study, we investigated the niche market for local, handmade and socially responsible wool products in South Africa. Our methodology included interviews, a choice-based conjoint analysis and a multinomial logit model. The results revealed that South African high-income consumers preferred locally produced wool products over imported wool products. This was followed by consumers' preferring handmade over machine-made products as well as socially responsible wool products over those that provided no information on social responsibility. The existence of a niche market in South Africa was demonstrated when consumers preferred ethical wool products. We defined consumers' demographic and psychographic factors for a niche market. The findings can assist the South African wool industry and small-scale woolgrowers to identify niche markets for wool products by considering intangible attributes.
| [1] | Cape Wools SA (2020) Seasonal Shipments. Available from: http://www.capewools.co.za/documentlibrary/shipments. |
| [2] |
Ferreira A, Lombard WA, Geyer AC, et al. (2021) The effect of fibre diameter and staple strength on the price of Döhne Merino wool in South Africa. Agrekon 60: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2021.1879659 doi: 10.1080/03031853.2021.1879659
|
| [3] | Sneddon J, Lee J, Soutar G (2014) Ethical issues on wool apparel purchases. Wellington, University of Western Australia, 1–8. |
| [4] | DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (2015) A profile of the South African Wool Market Value Chain. Available from: https://www.daff.gov.za/docs/amcp/woolmvcp2011-12.pdf. |
| [5] |
De Wet PS, Lombard WA, Bahta YT (2021) The financial viability of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology: A case of sheep feedlots. Afr J Bus Econ Res 16: 163–183. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2021/v16n1a7 doi: 10.31920/1750-4562/2021/v16n1a7
|
| [6] |
Strong C (1996) Features contributing to the growth of ethical consumerism- a preliminary investigation. Market Intell Plann 14: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509610127518 doi: 10.1108/02634509610127518
|
| [7] | Doyer O (2002) An inquiry into evolving supply chain governance structures. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. |
| [8] |
Adams D, Salois M (2010) Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renew Agr Food Syst 25: 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170510000219 doi: 10.1017/S1742170510000219
|
| [9] | Andersone I, Gaile-Sarkane E (2010) Socially responsible marketing for sustainable development. Hum Resour 12: 197–205. |
| [10] |
Bhattacharya C, Sen S (2004) Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to social initiatives. Calif Manage Rev 47: 9–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284 doi: 10.2307/41166284
|
| [11] |
Chen H, Burns D (2006) Environmental analysis of textile products. Cloth Text Res J 24: 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X06293065 doi: 10.1177/0887302X06293065
|
| [12] |
Czaplewski M (2018) The use of e-commerce in the promotion and sale of handmade products. De Gruyter Manag 22: 154–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2018-0011 doi: 10.2478/manment-2018-0011
|
| [13] |
Fuchs C, Schreier M, van Osselaer M (2015) The handmade effect: What's love got to do with it? J Market 79: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0018 doi: 10.1509/jm.14.0018
|
| [14] | Heim H (2019) On the market: The rise of artisanal fashion. In: Petican L (Ed.), Fashion and Contemporaneity, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392250_003 |
| [15] |
Hustvedt G, Peterson H, Chen Y (2008) Labelling wool products for animal welfare and environmental impact. Int J Consum Stud 32: 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00705.x doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00705.x
|
| [16] |
Ingenbleek I (2011) Consumer decision-making for animal-friendly products: synthesis and implications. Anim Welfare 20: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600002384 doi: 10.1017/S0962728600002384
|
| [17] | Oxford (2020) The Oxford Dictionary. 16th Ed., Oxford: Oxford Publishing. |
| [18] |
Riemsdijk L, Ingenbleek P, Trijp H, et al. (2017) Marketing animal-friendly products: addressing the consumer social dilemma with reinforcement positioning strategies. Animals 7: 98–102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120098 doi: 10.3390/ani7120098
|
| [19] |
Soley G, Hu W, Vassalos M (2019) Willingness to pay for shrimp with homegrown by heros, community-supported fishery, best aquaculture practices or local attributes. J Appl Agri Econ 51: 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2019.19 doi: 10.1017/aae.2019.19
|
| [20] | USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2019) Organic 101: What the USDA Organic Label Means. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2012/03/22/organic-101-what-usda-organic-label-means. |
| [21] |
Bojnec S, Tomsic N (2021) Corporate sustainability and enterprise performance: The mediating effects of internationalization and networks. Int J Prod Perform Manag 70: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0226 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0226
|
| [22] |
Tomsic N, Bojnec S, Simcic B (2015) Corporate sustainability and economic performance in small and medium sized enterprises. J Cleaner Prod 108 (Part A): 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.106 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.106
|
| [23] |
Martínez-Martínez D, Madueño JH, Jorge ML, et al. (2017) The strategic nature of corporate social responsibility in SMEs: A multiple mediator analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 117: 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0315 doi: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0315
|
| [24] |
Bouranta N, Psomas E (2017) A comparative analysis of competitive priorities and business performance between manufacturing and service firms. Int J Prod Perform Manag 66: 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0059 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0059
|
| [25] |
Shou Y, Hu W, Kang M, et al. (2018) Risk management and firm performance: The moderating role of supplier integration. Ind Manag Data Syst 118: 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0427 doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0427
|
| [26] |
Salem MS (2019) Structural equation modelling of the impact of environmental capabilities on competitiveness. Int J Prod Perform Manag 68: 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0259 doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0259
|
| [27] | Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford. |
| [28] |
Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11: 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323 doi: 10.1002/bse.323
|
| [29] |
Van Zyl K, Vermeulen H, Kirsten J (2013) Determining South African consumers' willingness to pay for certified Karoo lamb: An application of an experimental auction. Agrekon 52: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2013.847030 doi: 10.1080/03031853.2013.847030
|
| [30] | NWGA (National Wool Grower's Association) (2020) National Wool Grower's Association. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merino. |
| [31] | Brown O, Charverlat C, Eagleton D (2001) The coffee market- a background study. Oxford: Oxfam. |
| [32] |
Henderson T, Arora N (2010) Promoting brands across categories with a social cause: Implementing effective embedded premium programs. J Market 74: 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.41 doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.6.41
|
| [33] |
Janssen M, Hamm U (2012) Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for different organic certification logos. Food Qual Prefer 25: 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
|
| [34] | Kanta K, Srivalli P (2013) A study in cause and product importance of cause-related marketing campaign. In J Market Bus Com 2: 12–19. |
| [35] | De La Cerna A (2009) Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Organic Rice in General Santos City. s.l.: University of the Philippines Mindanao. |
| [36] |
Dickenson M (2000) Personal values, beliefs, knowledge and attitudes relating to the intentions to purchase apparel from socially responsible businesses. Cloth Text Res J 18: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0001800103 doi: 10.1177/0887302X0001800103
|
| [37] |
Hustvedt G, Bernard J (2008) Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: the influence of labelling or fibre origin and production methods. Int J Consum Stud 32: 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00706.x doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00706.x
|
| [38] |
Parrish E, Cassill N, Oxenham W (2004) Niche market opportunities in global textile environments. J Fash Market Man 8: 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020410518682 doi: 10.1108/13612020410518682
|
| [39] | Peterson H, Hustveldt G, Chen Y (2008) US consumer's willingness to pay for wool product attributes. Dallas, Texas. |
| [40] | Stats SA (2020) 2020 Mid-year population estimates. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p = 13453 & gclid = Cj0KCQjw6s2IBhCnARIsAP8RfAjSXeddIT6dABzSFGxMLSpR07GZIx0s8NsWsAKTv6hQmH-OhC3zdGsaAuJbEALw_wcB. |
| [41] | Stats SA (Statistics South Africa) (2011) Income dynamics and poverty status of households in South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa. |
| [42] | Exchange Rates (Online) Available from: https://www.exchangerates.org.uk/. |
| [43] |
Hughes D (1996) Reversing market trends: The challenge for the UK fresh fruit sector. Brit Food J 1: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709610151076 doi: 10.1108/00070709610151076
|
| [44] | Yang R (2014) How Corporate Social Responsibility Attributes Affect Consumer Purchase Intention. The University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. |
| [45] | McQuarrie E (2016) The Market research Toolbox. 4th Ed., California: SAGE Publications. |
| [46] | Cochran WG (1997) Sampling Techniques. 3rd Ed., JohnWiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA. |
| [47] | Chen YJ (2008) Consumer Preferences for Wool Production Attributes. Manhattan: Kansas State University, USA. |
| [48] |
Miller S, Tait P, Saunders C, et al. (2017) Estimation of consumer willingness-to-pay for social responsibility in fruit and vegetable products: A cross-country comparison using a choice experiment. J Consum Behav 16: e13–e25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1650 doi: 10.1002/cb.1650
|
| [49] |
Ghvanidze S, Velikova N, Dodd D (2017) A discrete choice experiment of the impact of consumers' environmental values, ethical concerns, and health consciousness on food choices—A cross-cultural analysis. Br Food J 119: 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0342 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0342
|
| [50] |
Meyerding S (2018) Consumer preferences for organic labels in Germany using the example of apples—Combining choice-based conjoint analysis and eye-tracking measurements. J Cleaner Prod 181: 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.235 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.235
|
| [51] |
Lappeman J, et al. (2019) Personal values and willingness to pay for fair trade coffee in Cape Town, South Africa. J Cleaner Prod 239: 118012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118012 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118012
|
| [52] |
Thurstone L (1927) A law of comparative judgement. Psychol Rev 34: 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288 doi: 10.1037/h0070288
|
| [53] | Rao V (2014) Applied Conjoint Analysis. 1st Ed., New York: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87753-0. |
| [54] |
Loureiro M, McCluskey J, Mittlehammer R (2003) Are stated preferences good predictors of market behavior? Land Econ 79: 44–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147104 doi: 10.2307/3147104
|
| [55] | Farkas F, Buldybajeva G (2013) Corporate social responsibility in the international context: A learning process. Int J Strategic Manag 18: 22–29. |
| [56] |
Doyle J (2016) Celebrity vegans and the lifestyle of ethical consumption. Environ Commun 10: 710–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1205643 doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1205643
|
| [57] |
Cullen K, Bond C, Bond J (2005) Consumer preferences for locally made speciality food products across Northern New England. Agric Resour Econ Rev 34: 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500008364 doi: 10.1017/S1068280500008364
|
| [58] | Murahwa A (2019) Describing Income Inequality in South Africa: Household Decomposition by Geo-Type. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 3335180. |
| [59] |
Auger P, Devinney T, Louviere J, et al. (2010) The importance of social product attributes in consumer purchasing decisions: A multi-country comparative study. Int Bus Rev 19: 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.10.002
|
| [60] |
Carrigan M, Szmigin I, Wright J (2004) Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. J Consum Mark 21: 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760410558672 doi: 10.1108/07363760410558672
|
| [61] |
Auger P, Devinney T, Louviere J (2008) Do social product features have value to consumers? Int J Res Mark 25: 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.005
|
| [62] | Nerlove M, Press, JS (1973) Univariate and Multivariate Log-Linear Logistic Models. Mimeographed, No. R-1306-EDA/NIH, Rand, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, USA. |
Michelle Marais, Henry Jordaan, Willem Abraham Lombard, Yonas T. Bahta. Assessing the potential of a niche market for wool products in South Africa[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 108-128. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024007
DownLoad: