Search Advanced

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2023, Volume 8, Issue 3: 889-913. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023047
Previous Article Next Article
Research article Special Issues

Consumption vs. non-consumption of plant-based beverages: A case study on factors influencing consumers' choices

  • 1.
    Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy
  • 2.
    Department of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy
  • 3.
    Department of Education, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • †These authors contributed equally to this work
  • Received: 27 June 2023 Revised: 24 August 2023 Accepted: 12 September 2023 Published: 22 September 2023

  • Plant-based beverages (PBBs) represent a growing global alternative to cow's milk. However, their development is strongly influenced by consumers' expectations of new foods introduced into the diet: environmental sustainability, balanced nutritional content, health aspects, and organoleptic properties. This study analyzes consumers' preferences and choice orientations towards plant-based beverages through the assessment of their eating style and concern towards environmental and health issues. To that end, an online questionnaire was conducted with a sample of 233 respondents living in the South-East area of Italy. Initially, principal component analyses were performed to identify distinct dimensions of individuals' orientation towards food quality, environment and health involvement. Then, the emerging dimensions were used as dependent variables for ANOVA comparisons between consumers and non-consumers of plant-based beverages, considering also individuals' preferences towards different PBBs. The main results showed a strong consumer concern for environmental sustainability issues, which was found as the main purchasing driver for plant-based beverage consumers. On the other hand, many respondents stated that they do not consume PBBs due to their negative organoleptic aspects and the unfamiliarity with these products. Furthermore, the individual's dietary style influences the consumption of plant-based beverages and, in particular, the search for nutritional and balanced compounds plays a key role in consumption choices. Finally, despite that the almonds cultivation for the traditional 'almond milk' production is typical in various Italian regions, consumers expressed averagely a weak connection with this product. In conclusion, considering our results, the market development of PPBs at a national level might be supported by marketing strategies dedicated to different individuals' profiles. At the same time, however, direct actions on the production process are needed to improve the organoleptic profile of these products and meet the dissatisfaction expressed by consumers.

    Citation: Francesco Sottile, Stefano Massaglia, Valentina Maria Merlino, Cristiana Peano, Giulia Mastromonaco, Ferdinando Fornara, Danielle Borra, Oriana Mosca. Consumption vs. non-consumption of plant-based beverages: A case study on factors influencing consumers' choices[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 889-913. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023047

    Related Papers:

  • Plant-based beverages (PBBs) represent a growing global alternative to cow's milk. However, their development is strongly influenced by consumers' expectations of new foods introduced into the diet: environmental sustainability, balanced nutritional content, health aspects, and organoleptic properties. This study analyzes consumers' preferences and choice orientations towards plant-based beverages through the assessment of their eating style and concern towards environmental and health issues. To that end, an online questionnaire was conducted with a sample of 233 respondents living in the South-East area of Italy. Initially, principal component analyses were performed to identify distinct dimensions of individuals' orientation towards food quality, environment and health involvement. Then, the emerging dimensions were used as dependent variables for ANOVA comparisons between consumers and non-consumers of plant-based beverages, considering also individuals' preferences towards different PBBs. The main results showed a strong consumer concern for environmental sustainability issues, which was found as the main purchasing driver for plant-based beverage consumers. On the other hand, many respondents stated that they do not consume PBBs due to their negative organoleptic aspects and the unfamiliarity with these products. Furthermore, the individual's dietary style influences the consumption of plant-based beverages and, in particular, the search for nutritional and balanced compounds plays a key role in consumption choices. Finally, despite that the almonds cultivation for the traditional 'almond milk' production is typical in various Italian regions, consumers expressed averagely a weak connection with this product. In conclusion, considering our results, the market development of PPBs at a national level might be supported by marketing strategies dedicated to different individuals' profiles. At the same time, however, direct actions on the production process are needed to improve the organoleptic profile of these products and meet the dissatisfaction expressed by consumers.


    加载中


    [1] Mäkinen OE, Wanhalinna V, Zannini E, et al. (2016) Foods for special dietary needs: Non-dairy plant-based milk substitutes and fermented dairy-type products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56: 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.761950 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.761950
    [2] Torrico DD, Fuentes S, Gonzalez Viejo C, et al. (2019) Cross-cultural effects of food product familiarity on sensory acceptability and non-invasive physiological responses of consumers. Food Res Int 115: 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.054 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.054
    [3] Wolf CA, Malone T, McFadden BR (2020) Beverage milk consumption patterns in the United States: Who is substituting from dairy to plant-based beverages? J Dairy Sci 103: 11209–11217. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18741 doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18741
    [4] Fructuoso I, Romão B, Han H, et al. (2021) An overview on nutritional aspects of plant-based beverages used as substitutes for cow's milk. Nutrients 13: 2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082650 doi: 10.3390/nu13082650
    [5] Elmadfa I, Freisling H (2007) Food-based dietary guidelines in Austria. ANM 51: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103561 doi: 10.1159/000103561
    [6] Rozenberg S, Body JJ, Bruyère O, et al. (2016) Effects of dairy products consumption on health: Benefits and beliefs—A commentary from the Belgian Bone Club and the European Society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases. Calcif Tissue Int 98: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-0062-x doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0062-x
    [7] Feldmann C, Hamm U (2015) Consumers' perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food Qual Preference 40: 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014
    [8] Cerjak M, Haas R, Brunner F, et al. (2014) What motivates consumers to buy traditional food products? Evidence from Croatia and Austria using word association and laddering interviews. Br Food J 116: 1726–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2014-0090 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2014-0090
    [9] Aprile MC, Caputo V, Nayga RM (2016) Consumers' preferences and attitudes toward local food products. J Food Prod Mark 22: 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2014.949990 doi: 10.1080/10454446.2014.949990
    [10] Haas R, Schnepps A, Pichler A, et al. (2019) Cow milk versus plant-based milk substitutes: A comparison of product image and motivational structure of consumption. Sustainability 11: 5046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185046 doi: 10.3390/su11185046
    [11] Verduci E, D'Elios S, Cerrato L, et al. (2019) Cow's milk substitutes for children: Nutritional aspects of milk from different mammalian species, special formula and plant-based beverages. Nutrients 11: 1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081739 doi: 10.3390/nu11081739
    [12] McCarthy KS, Parker M, Ameerally A, et al. (2017) Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk? J Dairy Sci 100: 6125–6138. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12519 doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519
    [13] Manasa R, Harshita M, Prakruthi M, et al. (2020) Non-dairy plant based beverages: A comprehensive review. The Pharma Innovation J 9: 258–271.
    [14] Aydar EF, Tutuncu S, Ozcelik B (2020) Plant-based milk substitutes: Bioactive compounds, conventional and novel processes, bioavailability studies, and health effects. J Funct Foods 70: 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2020.103975 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.103975
    [15] Sethi S, Tyagi SK, Anurag RK (2016) Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: a review. J Food Sci Technol 53: 3408–3423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3 doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3
    [16] Rasika DM, Vidanarachchi JK, Rocha RS, et al. (2021) Plant-based milk substitutes as emerging probiotic carriers. Curr Opin Food Sci 38: 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.025 doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.025
    [17] Reyes-Jurado F, Soto-Reyes N, Dávila-Rodríguez M, et al. (2021) Plant-based milk alternatives: Types, processes, benefits, and characteristics. Food Rev Int 0: 1–32.
    [18] Kwok K-C, Niranjan K (2007) Review: Effect of thermal processing on soymilk. Int J Food Sci Technol 30: 263–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb01377.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb01377.x
    [19] Maria MF, Victoria AT (2018) Influence of processing treatments on quality of vegetable milk from almond (Terminalia catappa) kernels. ACTA Sci Nutr Health 2: 37–42.
    [20] Bevande vegetali: un mercato che continua a crescere (2023) Atlante, 2023. Available from: https://www.atlantesrl.it/bevande-vegetali-un-mercato-che-continua-a-crescere/.
    [21] Cintio LD (2022) VEGANOK, Latte vegetale: il 78% dei consumatori l'ha provato almeno una volta, 2022. Available from: https://www.veganok.com/latte-vegetale-consumi/.
    [22] RepartoGrafico (2022) Alimentando, 1 italiano su 10 consuma abitualmente bevande vegetali. L'indagine di Everli, 2022. Available from: https://www.alimentando.info/1-italiano-su-10-consuma-abitualmente-bevande-vegetali-lindagine-di-everli/.
    [23] Giacalone D, Clausen MP, Jaeger SR (2022) Understanding barriers to consumption of plant-based foods and beverages: Insights from sensory and consumer science. Curr Opin Food Sci 48: 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100919 doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100919
    [24] Merlino VM, Massaglia S, Borra D, et al. (2022) Which factors drive consumer decisions during milk purchase? New individuals' profiles considering fresh pasteurized and UHT treated milk. Foods 11: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010077 doi: 10.3390/foods11010077
    [25] Ueasangkomsate P, Santiteerakul S (2016) A study of consumers' attitudes and intention to buy organic foods for sustainability. Proc Environ Sci 34: 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.037 doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.037
    [26] Roibás L, Elbehri A, Hospido A (2015) Evaluating the sustainability of Ecuadorian bananas: Carbon footprint, water usage and wealth distribution along the supply chain. Sustainable Prod Consumption 2: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2015.07.006 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2015.07.006
    [27] Graham DJ, Jeffery RW (2011) Location, location, location: Eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information. J Am Dietetic Assoc 111: 1704–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005
    [28] Fernan C, Schuldt JP, Niederdeppe J (2018) Health halo effects from product titles and nutrient content claims in the context of "protein" bars. Health Commun 33: 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1358240 doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1358240
    [29] Mastromonaco G, Merlino VM, Massaglia S, et al. (2023) Large-scale and online retailer assortment: The case of plant-based beverages as alternatives to cow's milk. Beverages 9: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9020040 doi: 10.3390/beverages9020040
    [30] Tribole E, Resch E (2017) The intuitive eating workbook: Ten principles for nourishing a healthy relationship with food. New Harbinger Publications.
    [31] Albers S (2012) Eating mindfully: How to end mindless eating and enjoy a balanced relationship with food. New Harbinger Publications.
    [32] Kessler DA (2009) The end of overeating: Taking control of the insatiable American appetite. Rodale Books.
    [33] Merlino VM, Brun F, Versino A, et al. (2020) Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay. AIMS Agric Food 5: 307–326. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.307
    [34] Malekpour M, Yazdani M, Rezvani H (2022) Investigating the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes with customer satisfaction: implications for food products. Br Food J 124: 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2022-0097 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2022-0097
    [35] Espejel J, Fandos C, Flavián C (2007) The role of intrinsic and extrinsic quality attributes on consumer behaviour for traditional food products. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 17: 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710835000 doi: 10.1108/09604520710835000
    [36] Haan M, Konijn EA, Burgers C, et al. (2018) Identifying sustainable population segments using a multi-domain questionnaire: A five factor sustainability scale. Soc Mark Q 24: 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500418794019 doi: 10.1177/1524500418794019
    [37] Merlino VM, Renna M, Nery J, et al. (2022) Are local dairy products better? Using principal component analysis to investigate consumers' perception towards quality, sustainability, and market availability. Animals 12: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111421 doi: 10.3390/ani12111421
    [38] Harpe SE (2015) How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 7: 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
    [39] Mishra SP, Sarkar U, Taraphder S, et al. (2017) Multivariate statistical data analysis-principal component analysis (PCA). Int J Livest Res 7: 60–78. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170415115235 doi: 10.5455/ijlr.20170415115235
    [40] Denver S, Jensen JD (2014) Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Qual Preference 31: 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014
    [41] Blanc S, Massaglia S, Borra D, et al. (2020) Animal welfare and gender: a nexus in awareness and preference when choosing fresh beef meat? Ital J Anim Sci 19: 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1747952 doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1747952
    [42] Denver S, Jensen JD (2014) Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Qual Preference 31: 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.014
    [43] Chapman KW, Lawless HT, Boor KJ (2001) Quantitative descriptive analysis and principal component analysis for sensory characterization of ultrapasteurized milk. J Dairy Sci 84: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74446-3 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74446-3
    [44] Shaidullina RM, Ikhsanova FA (2019) Application of mathematical methods in consumer choice theory in tourism sphere. Revista ESPACIOS 40: 9.
    [45] Di Vita G, Blanc S, Brun F, et al. (2019) Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: Exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham. Meat Sci 155: 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.013
    [46] Kim HY (2014) Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing means of more than two groups. Restor Dent Endod 39: 74–77. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.74 doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.74
    [47] Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG (2003) Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227: 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273011499 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2273011499
    [48] Taylor R (1990) Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. J Diagn Med Sonography 6: 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106 doi: 10.1177/875647939000600106
    [49] ISTAT (2020) Il Censimento Permanente della Popolazione in Puglia. Available from: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/03/Censimento-della-popolazione-in-Puglia_focus.pdf.
    [50] Pontonio E, Rizzello CG (2021) Milk alternatives and non-dairy fermented products: Trends and challenges. Foods 10: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020222 doi: 10.3390/foods10020222
    [51] Tuorila H, Hartmann C (2020) Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods. Curr Opin Food Sci 33: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004
    [52] Jaeger SR, Giacalone D (2021) Barriers to consumption of plant-based beverages: A comparison of product users and non-users on emotional, conceptual, situational, conative and psychographic variables. Food Res Int 144: 110363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110363 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110363
    [53] Cerjak M, Haas R, Brunner F, et al. (2014) What motivates consumers to buy traditional food products? Evidence from Croatia and Austria using word association and laddering interviews. Br Food J 116: 1726–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2014-0090 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2014-0090
    [54] Kempen E, Kasambala J, Christie L, et al. (2017) Expectancy-value theory contributes to understanding consumer attitudes towards cow's milk alternatives and variants. Int J Consum Stud 41: 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12331 doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12331
    [55] Oduro AF, Saalia FK, Adjei MYB (2021) Sensory acceptability and proximate composition of 3-blend plant-based dairy alternatives. Foods 10: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030482 doi: 10.3390/foods10030482
    [56] Silva ARA, Silva MMN, Ribeiro BD (2020) Health issues and technological aspects of plant-based alternative milk. Food Res Int 131: 108972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108972 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108972
    [57] McClements DJ, Newman E, McClements IF (2019) Plant-based milks: A review of the science underpinning their design, fabrication, and performance. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 18: 2047–2067. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12505 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12505
    [58] Balboni V (2021) Il Fatto Alimentare, Bevande vegetali di soia, riso, mandorla o avena? L'analisi di alcuni prodotti presenti sul mercato. Available from: https://ilfattoalimentare.it/bevande-vegetali-analisi.html.
    [59] Rombach M, Dean DL, Bitsch V (2023) "Got milk alternatives?" Understanding key factors determining U.S. consumers' willingness to pay for plant-based milk alternatives. Foods 12: 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061277 doi: 10.3390/foods12061277
    [60] Boaitey A, Minegishi K (2020) Determinants of household choice of dairy and plant-based milk alternatives: Evidence from a field survey. J Food Prod Mark 26: 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2020.1857318 doi: 10.1080/10454446.2020.1857318
    [61] Sethi S, Tyagi SK, Anurag RK (2016) Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: A review. J Food Sci Technol 53: 3408–3423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3 doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3
    [62] Janssen M, Busch C, Rödiger M, et al. (2016) Motives of consumers following a vegan diet and their attitudes towards animal agriculture. Appetite 105: 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.039 doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.039
    [63] Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393: 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
    [64] Dhar SK, Hoch SJ, Kumar N (2001) Effective category management depends on the role of the category. J Retailing 77: 165–184.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Agriculture and Food
1.9 3.7

Metrics

Article views(1423) PDF downloads(125) Cited by(4)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(14)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog