Treatment combination | kg of N per ha | kg of K2O per ha |
N0K25 | 0 | 12.5 |
N100K25 | 46 | 12.5 |
N200K25 | 92 | 12.5 |
N100K0 | 46 | 0 |
N100K50 | 46 | 25 |
N100K100 | 46 | 50 |
Eleutherine palmifolia is one of the medicinal plants widely used by the Dayak and Kutai tribes in Borneo Island, Indonesia as traditional medicines that can treat various diseases. Identification of the phytochemical content of E. palmifolia is very important to determine its potential as a medicinal plant. A significant factor in the success of the growth of E. palmifolia is the amount of fertilizer applied as a source of nutrients. In this study, the influence of various amounts of nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilizers on the growth, total phenolic and flavonoid content (TPC and TFC), and antioxidant activity was investigated in different extracts of E. palmifolia. The treatments included 0, 46 or 92 kg/ha of N combined with 12.5 kg/ha of K, and 0, 25 or 50 kg/ha of K combined with 46 kg/ha of N. Using water, ethanol, or n-hexane as solvents, each sample was extracted with sonication method. TPC and TFC of the bulb extracts were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and aluminum chloride assays, respectively. Antioxidant activity was analyzed using 2, 2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. Results showed that combining N and K had no significant effects on plant height, the number of tillers, leaves, or bulbs, and bulb diameter, while the chlorophyll reading value, total plant weight, and fresh bulb weight were significantly increased. The results indicated that the availability of N and K has a substantial effect on TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity. The aqueous extract had the highest TPC and DPPH scavenging activity, whereas the ethanol extract exhibited the highest TFC and antioxidant FRAP activity. Therefore, to improve fresh bulb weight, phenol and flavonoid content, and antioxidant properties of E. palmifolia aqueous and ethanol extracts, supplementation of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K is recommended.
Citation: Marlin Marlin, Marulak Simarmata, Umi Salamah, Waras Nurcholis. Effect of nitrogen and potassium application on growth, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Eleutherine palmifolia[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 580-593. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022036
[1] | Evi Mintowati Kuntorini, Laurentius Hartanto Nugroho, Maryani, Tri Rini Nuringtyas . Maturity effect on the antioxidant activity of leaves and fruits of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton.) Hassk.. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 282-296. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022018 |
[2] | Francyelli Regina Costa-Becheleni, Enrique Troyo-Diéguez, Alan Amado Ruiz-Hernández, Fernando Ayala-Niño, Luis Alejandro Bustamante-Salazar, Alfonso Medel-Narváez, Raúl Octavio Martínez-Rincón, Rosario Maribel Robles-Sánchez . Determination of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of the halophytes Suaeda edulis and Suaeda esteroa (Chenopodiaceae): An option as novel healthy agro-foods. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 716-742. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024039 |
[3] | Pham Thi Thu Ha, Nguyen Thi Bao Tran, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram, Vo Hoang Kha . Total phenolic, total flavonoid contents and antioxidant potential of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Vietnam. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 635-648. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.635 |
[4] | Nicolas Nagahama, Bruno Gastaldi, Michael N. Clifford, María M. Manifesto, Renée H. Fortunato . The influence of environmental variations on the phenolic compound profiles and antioxidant activity of two medicinal Patagonian valerians (Valeriana carnosa Sm. and V. clarionifolia Phil.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 106-124. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021007 |
[5] | Ebrahim Falahi, Zohre Delshadian, Hassan Ahmadvand, Samira Shokri Jokar . Head space volatile constituents and antioxidant properties of five traditional Iranian wild edible plants grown in west of Iran. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(4): 1034-1053. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.1034 |
[6] | Chiao Ying Huang, Gerald L. Riskowski, Jennifer Chang, Ching Hsuan Lin, Jinn Tsyy Lai, Audrey Chingzu Chang . Pecan shell by-products—phenolic compound contents and antimicrobial properties. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(2): 218-232. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.218 |
[7] | Olukemi Osukoya, Adewale Fadaka, Olusola Adewale, Oluwatobi Oluloye, Oluwafemi Ojo, Basiru Ajiboye, Deborah Adewumi, Adenike Kuku . In vitro anthelmintic and antioxidant activities of the leaf extracts of Theobroma cacao L.. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 568-577. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.568 |
[8] | Albert Nugraha, Asadin Briliantama, M Umar Harun, Li Sing-Chung, Chin Xuan Tan, Vuanghao Lim, Amir Husni, Widiastuti Setyaningsih . Ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from ear mushrooms (Auricularia auricula-judae): Assessing composition and antioxidant activity during fruiting body development. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1134-1150. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024059 |
[9] | Thi Thuy Le, Trung Kien Nguyen, Nu Minh Nguyet Ton, Thi Thu Tra Tran, Van Viet Man Le . Quality of cookies supplemented with various levels of turmeric by-product powder. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 209-219. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024012 |
[10] | Rossaporn Jiamjariyatam, Orachorn Mekkerdchoo, Pakkapong Phucharoenrak, Lu Zheng . Effects of freeze-drying and vacuum-drying on the quality, total phenolic contents, and antioxidant activities of bee honey in northern Thailand. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 430-444. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024025 |
Eleutherine palmifolia is one of the medicinal plants widely used by the Dayak and Kutai tribes in Borneo Island, Indonesia as traditional medicines that can treat various diseases. Identification of the phytochemical content of E. palmifolia is very important to determine its potential as a medicinal plant. A significant factor in the success of the growth of E. palmifolia is the amount of fertilizer applied as a source of nutrients. In this study, the influence of various amounts of nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilizers on the growth, total phenolic and flavonoid content (TPC and TFC), and antioxidant activity was investigated in different extracts of E. palmifolia. The treatments included 0, 46 or 92 kg/ha of N combined with 12.5 kg/ha of K, and 0, 25 or 50 kg/ha of K combined with 46 kg/ha of N. Using water, ethanol, or n-hexane as solvents, each sample was extracted with sonication method. TPC and TFC of the bulb extracts were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and aluminum chloride assays, respectively. Antioxidant activity was analyzed using 2, 2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. Results showed that combining N and K had no significant effects on plant height, the number of tillers, leaves, or bulbs, and bulb diameter, while the chlorophyll reading value, total plant weight, and fresh bulb weight were significantly increased. The results indicated that the availability of N and K has a substantial effect on TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity. The aqueous extract had the highest TPC and DPPH scavenging activity, whereas the ethanol extract exhibited the highest TFC and antioxidant FRAP activity. Therefore, to improve fresh bulb weight, phenol and flavonoid content, and antioxidant properties of E. palmifolia aqueous and ethanol extracts, supplementation of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K is recommended.
Eleutherine palmifolia (L.) Merr., in Indonesia called "bawang dayak", is a medicinal plant that is grown in Borneo Island, Kalimantan, Indonesia. E. palmifolia is one of the species of Iridaceae family and is considered a synonym of E. americana, E. plicata and E. bulbosa [1,2]. This species is widely cultivated in regions of Africa, South America, and Asia for its beneficial chemical compounds as traditional medicine [2,3]. E. palmifolia is traditionally used to treat diabetes, stroke, hypertension, breast cancer, fertility, and hypertensive diseases [4]. Numerous studies reported the beneficial effects of E. palmifolia on human health, including its anti-cancer [5], anti-fungal [6], anti-malarial [7], antioxidant [8] and anti-melanogenesis [9] activities. Bioactive chemicals of E. palmifolia have a large variety of pharmacological targets. For example, the antidiabetic activity of E. palmifolia is strongly connected with its eleutherinoside A content [4], whereas its antioxidant activity is associated with polyphenols [8]. Polyketide compounds in E. palmifolia have been linked to its antimicrobial activity [10]. With regard to investigations on E. palmifolia as a medicinal plant, it is very important to associate the number of active compounds in the plant extracts with its pharmacological activity. Therefore, in this study, total phenolic and flavonoid content (TPC and TFC) and antioxidant activity were assessed as parameters to evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilizers on E. palmifolia.
Plant nutrition is a critical aspect of increasing plant productivity. An important factor in plant growth and development is N [11]. N fertilizers have an impact on the yield and productivity of many plants, such as onions [12,13], rice [14] and milk thistle [15]. On the other hand, K is one of the most critical elements in physiological functions, such as photosynthetic capacity, ionic homeostasis, carbohydrate metabolism [16], enzymatic activation [17], water relations [18], osmotic adjustment [19] or resistance against abiotic stress [20,21] of plants. Secondary metabolites and their biological activity in plants may be influenced by N and K levels as reported by Barzegar et al [22], who stated that combination of N and K increased the polyphenol and vitamin C content and antioxidant activity of sweet fennel. Another study found that fertilizing N and K combination on Berberis microphylla increased the polyphenol secondary metabolite contents and antioxidant activities [23]. Typically, E. palmifolia is planted as a side plant by farmers and is not cultivated under optimal conditions. Numerous fertilizers can influence the flavonoid content, growth, and yield of E. palmifolia. Application of NPK 16:16:16 fertilizer at 2.5 g/L increased the production of E. palmifolia, and a concentration of 1.25 g/L increased its flavonoid content [24], chicken manure [25], and vinasse liquid organic [26]; however, our knowledge is limited about the effect of the N and K on the growth, polyphenol content, and antioxidant activity of E. palmifolia. In this study, we investigated the effect of N and K combination on morphological characters, polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of different extracts of E. palmifolia. The application of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers with optimum concentrations may have a positive impact on increasing the growth and yield of E. palmifolia, as well as improving the quality of its important chemical compounds.
Eleutherine palmifolia seedlings were obtained from the Faculty of Agriculture of Bengkulu University. The research was conducted from February to June 2020 in Bengkulu province, Indonesia (3°45′44″ S; 102°16′45″ E; altitude of 15 m). Bengkulu University station is located at 15 m above sea level with range of humidity of 78.6% to 85.9%, temperature of 25.5 ℃ to 28.5 ℃, and 4.5 mm/year of rainfall. Urea (46% N) and KCl (50% K2O) were used as the N and K source fertilizer, respectively. The treatments of N and K combinations are presented in Table 1. The experiment was organized in a completely randomized design with 3 replications. K fertilizer was applied at the time of planting, while N fertilizer was given in two times, once at the time of planting (0.5 dose) and again 21 days after planting (0.5 dose). The fertilizers were given according to the treatments as presented in Table 1.
The sixth-month bulbs of E. palmifolia were used as planting material. The bulbs were selected with relatively uniform shape and size. The top 1/4 of bulbs were cut horizontally using a cutter to enhance shoot growth. The bulbs were immersed in a PGPR (plant growth promotion rhizobacteria) solution with a concentration of 10 ml/L for 15 min. Bulbs were planted in polybags with a diameter of 45 cm containing 10 kg of growing medium (mixed of soil, cow manure, and rice husk in a ratio of 2:1:1 (v/v/v)). The chemicals properties of growing medium were consisted of pH 4.43, C 3.99%, N 0.31%, P 6.10 ppm, and K 0.20 meq of K/100 g of soil). Each polybag was planted with three E. palmifolia bulbs. The irrigation, fertilization, weed, and diseases control were manually performed for maintenance of plants. Plant height, number of tillers, number of leaves, chlorophyll reading value (SPAD), total plant weight, number of bulbs, the diameter of the bulb, and fresh bulb weight were observed as morphological characteristics. Randomly selected ten plants from each unit were used for data collection. Four months after planting, the bulb of E. palmifolia (n = 10 plants) randomly selected plant was harvested and further analyses were carried out.
Treatment combination | kg of N per ha | kg of K2O per ha |
N0K25 | 0 | 12.5 |
N100K25 | 46 | 12.5 |
N200K25 | 92 | 12.5 |
N100K0 | 46 | 0 |
N100K50 | 46 | 25 |
N100K100 | 46 | 50 |
The bulbs collected of randomly selected ten plants of each treatment were cleaned, cut, dried, and then reduced into powdered form. Samples were extracted using aqueous, ethanol, and n-hexane as solvent extraction using the procedure by Nurcholis et al [27] with modifications. Briefly, sample (2 g) was extracted twice with solvent (10 mL) in the dark room and then sonicated and stirred for 30 min. The mixtures were centrifugated at 10, 000 × g at 4 ℃ (Kitman-T24, Tomy Tech USA Inc.) for 15 min, and the supernatants were concentrated to the volume of 10 mL using a rotary vacuum evaporator (HAHNVAPOR, Korea). The final extract concentration of E. palmifolia that used for further analysis was 2 g/10 mL or 0.2 g/mL. The final extract of E. palmifolia was obtained and then used for further analysis total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity.
In accordance with previously published assays, TPC and TFC were determined using spectrophotometric techniques [28]. TPC was measured in the extract obtained from each sample with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per g of dry weight (mg GAE/g DW). Meanwhile, TFC was measured using an aluminium chloride reagent and expressed as mg quercetin equivalents per g of dry weight (mg QE/g DW).
Antioxidant activity was determined using two in-vitro techniques. The free radical scavenging and reducing power antioxidant activities were determined using the 2, 2-diphenyl picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays [29]. Results of antioxidant activity expressed in μmol Trolox equivalent per g of dry weight (μmol TE/g DW).
Three replicates were used to get mean data ± SD. ANOVA was determined using the ExpDes packages in R, and then a Scott-Knott test was performed [30]. When p < 0.05 is used, there are significant differences.
Nitrogen is a macroelement that all plants, including E. palmifolia, require in substantial amounts to enhance their growth and productivity [13]. The results of the study showed that the combination of N and K fertilizer significantly (p < 0.05) affected chlorophyll reading value and total plant weight, which all attained maximum values at a combination of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K (Table 2). The results showed that the combination treatment of N and K fertilizers has no significant effect on the growth parameters of plant height, number of tillers, and leaves of E. palmifolia. An increase in chlorophyll reading value with growth parameters was also found in strawberries treated with fresh chicken manure [31]. The role of nitrogen during plant growth can be observed through the chlorophyll reading value in plants to increase the efficiency of N and K use according to plant needs [32].
The results recorded that treatment of N (0–92 kg/ha) combined with K (12.5 kg/ha) increased the chlorophyll reading value of E. palmifolia compared to other combination treatments (Table 2). This data indicated that the K (12.5 kg/ha) produced the highest chlorophyll reading value. The obtained data of this work were in line with the previous study on cotton photosynthetic capacity [33]. As reported by Naciri et al. [34], potassium significantly affects the chlorophyll content of tomato. The result indicated the importance of the presence of K for plant growth of E. palmifolia, especially in the chlorophyll formation.
A higher total plant weight parameter was shown in the combination treatment of 46 kg/ha N with 12.5 kg/ha K, which was not significantly different from the combination treatment of 46 kg/ha N with 0–50 kg/ha K (Table 2). These results indicate that the application of nitrogen fertilizer combination of N and K was required for E. palmifolia to increase growth and development, which was shown by higher plant weights. In different plants, N and K enhances the growth performance in rice [35], strawberry [36] and rainfed wheat [37] plants.
Treatment combination | Plant height (cm) | Number of tillers | Number of leaves |
Chlorophyll reading value (SPAD) | Total plant weight (g) |
N0K25 | 36.32 ± 2.14a | 8.00 ± 5.29a | 27.00 ± 5.29a | 46.03 ± 6.56a | 78.00 ± 6.55b |
N100K25 | 40.58 ± 3.64a | 13.67 ±7.37a | 40.00 ± 9.98a | 47.65 ± 1.43a | 95.33 ± 7.50a |
N200K25 | 41.95 ± 1.72a | 8.00 ± 2.64a | 25.00 ± 2.64a | 47.80 ± 11.60a | 78.67 ± 8.08b |
N100K0 | 38.92 ± 1.59a | 10.17 ± 10.15a | 31.67 ± 10.15a | 37.33 ± 4.73b | 94.83 ± 14.25a |
N100K50 | 39.90 ± 2.03a | 10.83 ± 6.33a | 36.83 ± 6.33a | 37.00 ± 4.73b | 106.33 ± 12.66a |
N100K100 | 40.62 ± 2.27a | 10.67 ± 9.98a | 39.33 ± 7.37a | 35.33 ± 1.53b | 102.83 ± 10.34a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
The effect of N and K fertilizers on the yield parameters of E. palmifolia is presented in Table 3. The results showed that the combination of N and K fertilizers has no significantly different effect on the number and diameter of a bulb of E. palmifolia. However, the combination of N and K fertilizers significantly impacted fresh bulb weight. The highest fresh bulb weight (66.01–71.14 g/clump) was obtained in the combination treatment of N fertilizer (46–92 kg/ha) with K fertilizer (0–50 kg/ha). Similar results were previously reported by Gebretsadik and Dechassa [38] that increasing the rate of nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg/ha increased the onion marketable fresh bulb yield by a different percentage of 30%. The result showed that the treatment of K fertilizer (12.5 kg/ha) without N fertilizer produced the lowest tuber weight (58.68 g/clump). The result indicates the importance of nitrogen nutrients in increasing the yield of E. palmifolia. Similar results were reported by Uher et al. [39] that the yield depended on the increase in nitrogen dose, and the highest nitrogen dose obtained the highest broccoli yield. The deficiency of nitrogen may decrease chlorophyll biosynthesis, which leads to yield reduction.
The results showed that without the addition of K fertilizer, E. palmifolia produced good yields (Table 3). Under conditions of low K availability, plants have a strategy to maintain K needs. For example, the plant increased K uptake from the soil redistributes K ions between cytosolic and vacuolar pools, cytosolic homeostasis, and modifications in root system development and architecture [40]. Supplying optimum N and K levels was proved to be essential for plant growth and production of high yield and improving the quality of E. palmifolia.
Treatments | Number of bulbs | Diameter of bulb (cm) | Fresh bulb weight (g) |
N0K25 | 14.67 ± 1.3a | 1.75 ± 0.06a | 58.68 ± 6.11b |
N100K25 | 16.17 ± 2.4a | 1.76 ± 0.08a | 71.14 ± 5.29a |
N200K25 | 13.83 ± 1.5a | 1.75 ± 0.02a | 67.06 ± 2.64a |
N100K0 | 11.50 ± 2.6a | 1.81 ± 0.06a | 65.55 ± 8.75a |
N100K50 | 11.50 ± 0.9a | 1.86 ± 0.09a | 66.70 ± 5.76a |
N100K100 | 14.67 ± 4.5a | 1.75 ± 0.11a | 66.01 ± 7.28a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
TPC in the E. palmifolia extracts is strongly influenced by the combination of N and K fertilizer. TPC ranged from 2.192–3.688 GAE /g DW in aqueous extract, 1.474–2.815 GAE/g DW in ethanol extract, and 0.219–0.304 GAE/g DW in n-hexane extract (Table 4). The phenolic content of several plants has been shown to be affected by environmental factors and crop management [41,42]. Phenolics are antioxidant compounds in stressed plant tissues [43], especially those with nutritional deficiencies [44]. Previous research revealed that the concentration of phenolics varies in response to N and K fertilization. Nitrogen is the substrate for the biosynthesis of phenylalanine, whereas phenylalanine is the substrate for polyphenol chemicals [45]. In most cases, increasing the application of nitrogen reduces the polyphenol content of plants [46]. It is possible, due to conflict between the utilization of nitrogen for growth and the formation of secondary metabolites; if growth increases, polyphenolic compound production will decrease [42]. In general, the administration of N and K fertilizers has been regarded as a technique for enhancing the phenolic content of plant tissue [47]. Among the combination treatments of N and K fertilizers observed, the combination treatment of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K fertilizers produced the highest TPC (aqueous extract, 3.688 mg GAE/g DW) compared to other treatments. These results indicated that N and K fertilizers strongly affected the growth and polyphenol metabolism of E. palmifolia. Similar results were recorded that boosting N and K fertilization increased the total phenolic content in sweet fennel [22] and colored potato [48]. Meanwhile, the TPC content obtained in E. palmifolia with aqueous extract was higher than using ethanol and n-hexane extracts. Our finding is in contras with Febrinda et al. [49], who discovered that TPC concentrations in ethanolic extract from traditional market at East Kalimantan, Indonesia was higher than those in aqueous extract. The results of this study are intriguing since the combination of N and K fertilizers can increase the phenolic content that is soluble in aqueous solvents of E. palmifolia. As a result, herbal medicine will be safer than utilizing ethanol or hexane extracts.
Treatments | Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 2.694 ± 0.00dA | 2.740 ± 0.01aA | 0.253 ± 0.01cB |
N100K25 | 3.688 ± 0.00aA | 2.815 ± 0.00aB | 0.304 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 2.192 ± 0.01eA | 2.192 ± 0.01cA | 0.288 ± 0.00bB |
N100K0 | 3.032 ± 0.00cA | 1.474 ± 0.00dB | 0.251 ± 0.01cC |
N100K50 | 2.624 ± 0.01dA | 2.381 ± 0.00bB | 0.286 ± 0.01bC |
N100K100 | 3.150 ± 0.01bA | 1.940 ± 0.00bB | 0.219 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
TFC of E. palmifolia was measured using different extraction solvents, namely aqueous, ethanol, and n-hexane, as shown in Table 5. TFC in the E. palmifolia extracts depended on the combination of N and K fertilizer and the extraction solvents. Among the treatment of N and K fertilizer combinations investigated, TFC ranged from 0.398 to 0.529 QE/g DW in aqueous extract, 0.616 to 0.861 QE/g DW in ethanol extract, and 0.573 to 0.676 QE/g DW in n-hexane extract. These results indicated that the TFC in the combination of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K has the highest TFC content. Lower content of TFC with aqueous extracts as a solvent was obtained after the application of the nitrogen-free with K of 25 kg/ha. The results showed that plants produced low amounts of flavonoid compounds without nitrogen fertilizer. Results indicate that nitrogen is an essential element in increasing plant metabolism. In solvent extraction, ethanol extract was presented higher TFC than aqueous and n-hexane extracts. Febrinda et al. [49] also found that TFC in the ethanolic extract were higher than aqueous extract. This study shows that the combination of 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K fertilizers has increased TFC in ethanol extract of E. palmifolia, which is likely to be a dose target for the production of flavonoid compounds.
Treatments | Total flavonoid content (mg QE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.398 ± 0.00cC | 0.779 ± 0.00bA | 0.651 ± 0.01bB |
N100K25 | 0.529 ± 0.01aC | 0.861 ± 0.02aA | 0.676 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.409 ± 0.00cC | 0.842 ± 0.02aA | 0.573 ± 0.01eB |
N100K0 | 0.464 ± 0.01bB | 0.616 ± 0.01dA | 0.617 ± 0.00dA |
N100K50 | 0.448 ± 0.01bC | 0.711 ± 0.01cA | 0.629 ± 0.00cB |
N100K100 | 0.399 ± 0.01cC | 0.722 ± 0.00cA | 0.572 ± 0.01eB |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
This study examined the antioxidant capacity of different extracts of E. palmifolia using DPPH and FRAP assays. Based on the antioxidant activities determined using the DPPH (Table 6) and FRAP (Table 7) methods, we concluded that FRAP method was better than DPPH in analyzing the anti-oxidant activities. This effect is caused by distinct reaction processes of antioxidant activity, including power reduction for FRAP and free radical scavenging for DPPH [29]. Antioxidant activity differed amongst a sample of E. palmifolia extracts, which can be explained by the varying forms or concentrations of antioxidant compounds contained inside [27,50]. The ability to absorb and neutralize free radicals, to quench single and triple oxidants, or to degrade peroxides is referred to as antioxidant activity [51]. Antioxidant-rich plants may be beneficial as possible therapeutic herbs. The plant's antioxidant properties can help scavenge free radicals. Polyphenol (flavonoid and phenolic) chemicals found in plants act as natural antioxidants, scavenging free radicals—the higher the flavonoids or total phenols content, the better the antioxidant ability. The antioxidant activity of E. bulbosa extracts demonstrated its unique nutritional value, indicating that it has the potential to serve as a natural source of antioxidants [8].
Treatments | DPPH scavenging activity (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.232 ± 0.01bA | 0.221 ± 0.00cC | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
N100K25 | 0.318 ± 0.01aA | 0.305 ± 0.01aB | 0.153 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.339 ± 0.00aA | 0.253 ± 0.00bC | 0.105 ± 0.01cB |
N100K0 | 0.361 ± 0.01aA | 0.208 ± 0.00dB | 0.073 ± 0.01dC |
N100K50 | 0.215 ± 0.00bA | 0.219 ± 0.00cA | 0.097 ± 0.01cB |
N100K100 | 0.198 ± 0.01bA | 0.204 ± 0.00dB | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
DPPH radical scavenging activity of E. palmifolia extracts was affected by N and K fertilizer and solvent extraction, as presented in Table 6. Among the treatment of N and K fertilizer investigated, DPPH scavenging activity ranged from 0.097 to 0.361 µmol TE/g DW. The highest antioxidant scavenging activity (0.361 µmol TE/g DW) was recorded at 46 kg/ha N followed by 92 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K combined (0.339 µmol TE/g DW) and 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K combined (0.318 µmol TE/g DW). These results are in agreement with Barzegar et al. [22], who reported that applying N and K fertilizer affected increasing of DPPH scavenging activity in sweet fennel extract. Ma et al. [52] found that the N management increased antioxidant activity in wheat grain. Meanwhile, DPPH scavenging activity in different solvents extracted ranged from 0.198 to 0.361 µmol TE/g DW in aqueous extract, 0.204 to 0.305 µmol TE/g DW in ethanol extract, and 0.097 to 0.153 µmol TE/g DW in n-hexane extract. Results indicated that aqueous extracts of E. palmifolia were higher radical scavenging activity than ethanol and n-hexane extract. Attractive, these results are in line with the data of total phenolic content (Table 4). Antioxidant properties caused by phenolic compounds have been proven in a number of research in the last several decades [53,54,55].
Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) value of E. palmifolia extracts is showed in Table 7. FRAP value varied from 61.598 to 123.810 µmol TE/g DW among the treatments of N and K fertilizer studied. The highest reducing antioxidant power value was identified at 46 kg/ha N and 12.5 kg/ha K. These findings are in line with those of Michalska et al. [48], who found that the FRAP value of colored potato increased when N and K fertilizer was applied. Besides fertilization treatments, the solvent used to extract antioxidants can also have an effect on how effective they are. The FRAP values varied from 87.545 to 104.757 µmol TE/g DW in aqueous extract, 103.393 to 123.810 µmol TE/g DW in ethanol extract, and 61.598 to 72.151 µmol TE/g DW in n-hexane extract. Results indicated that ethanol extracts of E. palmifolia were higher in reducing antioxidant power activity than aqueous and n-hexane extracts. According to the total flavonoid content as presented in Table 5, these results are in line with them. These results indicated that flavonoid compounds are responsible for the antioxidant activity of E. palmifolia, especially through the mechanism of reducing antioxidant power. There has been a lot of research in the last few decades that shows that flavonoid compounds have antioxidant properties [56,57,58].
Treatments | Ferric reducing antioxidant power (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 91.030 ± 0.00cB | 122.219 ± 0.00bA | 64.242 ± 0.00cC |
N100K25 | 104.757 ± 0.00aB | 123.810 ± 0.01aA | 65.477 ± 0.00bC |
N200K25 | 101.992 ± 0.00bB | 114.621 ± 0.00cA | 72.151 ± 0.00aC |
N100K0 | 90.712 ± 0.00cB | 103.393 ± 0.00fA | 61.856 ± 0.00dC |
N100K50 | 88.401 ± 0.01dB | 106.166 ± 0.00eA | 65.174 ± 0.00bC |
N100K100 | 87.545 ± 0.00dB | 109.681 ± 0.00dA | 61.598 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
The results of our study indicated that fertilization application of N and K improved chlorophyll reading value, total plant weight, and fresh bulb weight of E. palmifolia. In addition, the E. palmifolia treated with N and K exhibited higher total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity in aqueous and ethanol extracts. These results suggest that commercial application of N 46 kg/ha and K 12.5 kg/ha can be proposed to improve E. palmifolia growth, polyphenol content, and antioxidant activities.
This research was supported by the Faculty of Agriculture, the University of Bengkulu for research stations and facilities, the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences for Agricultural Biochemistry Division of Department Biochemistry, IPB University, for polyphenol and antioxidant determination.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
[1] |
Insanu M, Kusmardiyani S, Hartati R (2014) Recent studies on phytochemicals and pharmacological effects of Eleutherine Americana Merr. Procedia Chem 13: 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2014.12.032 doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2014.12.032
![]() |
[2] |
Kamarudin AA, Sayuti NH, Saad N, et al. (2021) Eleutherine bulbosa (Mill.) Urb. Bulb: Review of the pharmacological activities and its prospects for application. Int J Mol Sci 22: 6747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136747 doi: 10.3390/ijms22136747
![]() |
[3] |
Rani VS, Nair BR (2016) GC-MS analysis of ethyl acetate extract of Eleutherine bulbosa (Urban) Miller (Iridaceae). Int J Pharm Sci Res 7: 1729-1733. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(4).1729-33 doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(4).1729-33
![]() |
[4] |
Ieyama T, Gunawan-Puteri MDPT, Kawabata J (2011) α-Glucosidase inhibitors from the bulb of Eleutherine americana. Food Chem 128: 308-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.021 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.021
![]() |
[5] |
Lestari D, Kartika R, Marliana E (2019) Antioxidant and anticancer activity of Eleutherine bulbosa (Mill.) Urb on leukemia cells L1210. J Phys Conf Ser 1277: 12022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1277/1/012022 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1277/1/012022
![]() |
[6] |
Masfria M, Tampubolon MSA (2019) The antifungal activity of n-hexane extract of Eleutherine palmifolia (L). Merr Bulbs against Candida albicans and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 7: 3777-3780. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.502 doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.502
![]() |
[7] |
Vale VV, Cruz JN, Viana GMR, et al. (2020) Naphthoquinones isolated from Eleutherine plicata herb: in vitro antimalarial activity and molecular modeling to investigate their binding modes. Med Chem Res 29: 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-019-02498-z doi: 10.1007/s00044-019-02498-z
![]() |
[8] |
Shi PQ, Du WJ, Wang YY, et al. (2018) Total phenolic, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of bulbs, leaves, and flowers made from Eleutherine bulbosa (Mill.) Urb. Food Sci Nutr 7: 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.834 doi: 10.1002/fsn3.834
![]() |
[9] |
Biworo A, Abdurrahim, Nupiah N, et al. (2019) The effect of dayak onion (Eleutherine palmifolia (L.) merr) tuber extract against erythema and melanin index on rat (Rattus norvegicus) skin induced by acute UV. AIP Conf Proc 2108: 020036. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110011 doi: 10.1063/1.5110011
![]() |
[10] |
Jiang H, Man WJ, Hou AJ, et al. (2020) The chemical constituents from the active fractions of Eleutherine bulbosa with their antimicrobial activity. Nat Prod Res 34: 1743-1749. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1530229 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1530229
![]() |
[11] |
Dimkpa CO, Fugice J, Singh U, et al. (2020) Development of fertilizers for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency-trends and perspectives. Sci Total Environ 731: 139113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139113 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139113
![]() |
[12] |
Geisseler D, Ortiz RS, Diaz J (2022) Nitrogen nutrition and fertilization of onions (Allium cepa L.)-A literature review. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 291: 110591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110591 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110591
![]() |
[13] |
Golubkina N, Amalfitano C, Sekara A, et al. (2022) Yield and bulb quality of storage onion cultivars as affected by farming system and nitrogen dose. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 293: 110751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110751 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110751
![]() |
[14] |
Nda S, Sebetha E (2021) Data on effect of variety, seedling transplanting age and nitrogen fertilizer rates on growth performance of rice in Southern Guinea Savannah, Nigeria. Data Brief 39: 107582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107582 doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107582
![]() |
[15] |
Liava V, Karkanis A, Tsiropoulos N (2021) Yield and silymarin content in milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.) fruits affected by the nitrogen fertilizers. Ind Crop Prod 171: 113955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113955 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113955
![]() |
[16] |
Ju FY, Pang JL, Huo YY, et al. (2021) Potassium application alleviates the negative effects of salt stress on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield by improving the ionic homeostasis, photosynthetic capacity and carbohydrate metabolism of the leaf subtending the cotton boll. Field Crop Res 272: 108288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108288 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108288
![]() |
[17] |
Ma L, Shi Y (2011) Effects of potassium fertilizer on physiological and biochemical index of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Energ Procedia 5: 581-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.102 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.102
![]() |
[18] |
Oddo E, Abbate L, Inzerillo S, et al. (2020) Water relations of two Sicilian grapevine cultivars in response to potassium availability and drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 148: 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.025 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.025
![]() |
[19] |
Zahoor R, Zhao W, Abid M, et al (2017) Potassium application regulates nitrogen metabolism and osmotic adjustment in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) functional leaf under drought stress. J Plant Physiol 215: 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.001
![]() |
[20] |
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHMB, Nahar K, et al (2018) Potassium: A vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agronomy 8: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8030031 doi: 10.3390/agronomy8030031
![]() |
[21] |
Johnson R, Vishwakarma K, Hossen MS, et al. (2022) Potassium in plants: Growth regulation, signaling, and environmental stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 172: 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.001
![]() |
[22] |
Barzegar T, Mohammadi S, Ghahremani Z (2020) Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on growth, yield and chemical composition of sweet fennel. J Plant Nutr 43: 1189-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1724306 doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1724306
![]() |
[23] |
Arena ME, Postemsky PD, Curvetto NR (2017) Changes in the phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Berberis microphylla G. Forst. berries in relation to light intensity and fertilization. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 218: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.004
![]() |
[24] |
Rosmawaty T, Jumin HB, Mardaleni M, et al. (2019) Production and flavonoid content of Dayak onion (Eleutherine palmifolia) with application of NPK 16:16:16 at various ages of harvesting. Din Pertanian 35: 111-118. https://doi.org/10.25299/dp.2019.vol35(3).4574 doi: 10.25299/dp.2019.vol35(3).4574
![]() |
[25] |
Chotimah HENC, Jaya A, Suparto H, et al. (2020) Utilizing organic fertilizers on two types of soil to improve growth and yield of Bawang Dayak (Eleutherine americana Merr). AGRIVITA J Agric Sci 43: 164-173. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v43i1.1784 doi: 10.17503/agrivita.v43i1.1784
![]() |
[26] |
Ekawati R, Saputri LH (2018) Pengaruh cara pemberian pupuk organik cair vinasse terhadap pertumbuhan awal bawang dayak (Eleutherine palmifolia). Kultivasi 17: 760-765. https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v17i3.18954 doi: 10.24198/kultivasi.v17i3.18954
![]() |
[27] |
Nurcholis W, Sya'bani Putri DN, Husnawati H, et al. (2021) Total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts from accessions of Amomum compactum fruits. Ann Agric Sci 66: 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2021.04.001
![]() |
[28] |
Calvindi J, Syukur M, Nurcholis W (2020) Investigation of biochemical characters and antioxidant properties of different winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) genotypes grown in Indonesia. Biodiversitas J Biolo Diversity 21: 2420-2424. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210612 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210612
![]() |
[29] |
Batubara I, Komariah K, Sandrawati A, et al. (2020) Genotype selection for phytochemical content and pharmacological activities in ethanol extracts of fifteen types of Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. leaves using chemometric analysis. Sci Rep 10: 20945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77991-2 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77991-2
![]() |
[30] |
Ferreira EB, Cavalcanti PP, Nogueira DA (2014) ExpDes: An R package for ANOVA and experimental designs. Appl Math 5: 2952-2958. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.519280 doi: 10.4236/am.2014.519280
![]() |
[31] |
Zhang DQ, Cheng HY, Hao BQ, et al. (2021) Effect of fresh chicken manure as a non-chemical soil fumigant on soil-borne pathogens, plant growth and strawberry fruit profitability. Crop Prot 146: 105653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105653 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105653
![]() |
[32] |
Kwon SJ, Kim HR, Roy SK, et al. (2019) Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on growth characteristics of two species of Bellflower (Platycodon grandiflorum). J Crop Sci Biotechnol 22: 481-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-019-0277-0 doi: 10.1007/s12892-019-0277-0
![]() |
[33] |
Chen JQ, Guo ZD, Chen HN, et al. (2021) Effects of different potassium fertilizer types and dosages on cotton yield, soil available potassium and leaf photosynthesis. Arch Agron Soil Sci 67: 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1723005 doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1723005
![]() |
[34] |
Naciri R, Lahrir M, Benadis C, et al. (2021) Interactive effect of potassium and cadmium on growth, root morphology and chlorophyll a fluorescence in tomato plant. Sci Rep 11: 5384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84990-4 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84990-4
![]() |
[35] |
Hou WF, Xue XX, Li XK, et al. (2019) Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on: Grain yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in low potassium fertility soil in China. F Crop Res 236: 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.006
![]() |
[36] |
Preciado-Rangel P, Troyo-Diéguez E, Valdez-Aguilar LA, et al. (2020) Interactive effects of the potassium and nitrogen relationship on yield and quality of strawberry grown under soilless conditions. Plants 9: 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040441 doi: 10.3390/plants9040441
![]() |
[37] |
Sedri MH, Roohi E, Niazian M, et al. (2022) Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on quantitative-qualitative traits and drought tolerance indices of rainfed wheat cultivar. Agronomy 12: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010030 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010030
![]() |
[38] |
Gebretsadik K, Dechassa N (2018) Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) to nitrogen fertilizer rates and spacing under rain fed condition at Tahtay Koraro, Ethiopia. Sci Rep 8: 9495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27762-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27762-x
![]() |
[39] |
Uher A, Mezeyová I, Hegedűsová A, et al. (2017) Impact of nutrition on the quality and quantity of cauliflower florets. Potravinarstvo Slovak J Food Sci 11: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.5219/723 doi: 10.5219/723
![]() |
[40] |
Chérel I, Lefoulon C, Boeglin M, et al. (2014) Molecular mechanisms involved in plant adaptation to low K+ availability. J Exp Bot 65: 833-848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert402 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert402
![]() |
[41] |
Sampaio BL, Bara MTF, Ferri PH, et al. (2011) Influence of environmental factors on the concentration of phenolic compounds in leaves of Lafoensia pacari. Rev Bras Farmacogn Brazilian J Pharmacogn 21: 1127-1137. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-695x2011005000177 doi: 10.1590/s0102-695x2011005000177
![]() |
[42] |
Heimler D, Romani A, Ieri F (2017) Plant polyphenol content, soil fertilization and agricultural management: a review. Eur Food Res Technol 243: 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2826-6 doi: 10.1007/s00217-016-2826-6
![]() |
[43] |
Caretto S, Linsalata V, Colella G, et al. (2015) Carbon fluxes between primary metabolism and phenolic pathway in plant tissues under stress. Int J Mol Sci 16: 26378-26394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161125967 doi: 10.3390/ijms161125967
![]() |
[44] |
Galieni A, Di Mattia C, De Gregorio M, et al. (2015) Effects of nutrient deficiency and abiotic environmental stresses on yield, phenolic compounds and antiradical activity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 187: 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.036 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.036
![]() |
[45] |
Nguyen PM, Niemeyer ED (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Agric Food Chem 56: 8685-8691. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801485u doi: 10.1021/jf801485u
![]() |
[46] |
Stefanelli D, Goodwin I, Jones R (2010) Minimal nitrogen and water use in horticulture: Effects on quality and content of selected nutrients. Food Res Int 43: 1833-1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.022 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.022
![]() |
[47] |
Delgado R, Martín P, del Álamo M, et al. (2004) Changes in the phenolic composition of grape berries during ripening in relation to vineyard nitrogen and potassium fertilisation rates. J Sci Food Agric 84: 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1685 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1685
![]() |
[48] |
Michalska A, Wojdyło A, Bogucka B (2016) The influence of nitrogen and potassium fertilisation on the content of polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of coloured potato. J Food Compos Anal 47: 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.01.004
![]() |
[49] | Febrinda AE, Yuliana ND, Ridwan E, et al. (2014) Hyperglycemic control and diabetes complication preventive activities of Bawang Dayak (Eleutherine palmifolia L. Merr.) bulbs extracts in alloxan-diabetic rats. Int Food Res J 21: 1405-1411. |
[50] |
Donno D, Cerutti AK, Prgomet I, et al. (2015) Foodomics for mulberry fruit (Morus spp.): Analytical fingerprint as antioxidants' and health properties' determination tool. Food Res Int 69: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.020 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.020
![]() |
[51] |
Carocho M, Ferreira ICFR (2013) A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food Chem Toxicol 51: 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.021 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.021
![]() |
[52] |
Ma DY, Sun DX, Li YG, et al. (2015) Effect of nitrogen fertilisation and irrigation on phenolic content, phenolic acid composition, and antioxidant activity of winter wheat grain. J Sci Food Agric 95: 1039-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6790 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6790
![]() |
[53] |
Singh M, Dubey RK, Koley TK, et al. (2019) Valorization of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L) DC) by evaluation of its antioxidant activity through chemometric analysis. South African J Bot 121: 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.026 doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.026
![]() |
[54] |
Liu Gy, Zhu Wq, Zhang J, et al. (2022) Antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds separated from tea seed oil in vitro and in vivo. Food Chem 371: 131122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131122 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131122
![]() |
[55] |
Kumari R, Akhtar S, Kumar R, et al. (2022) Influence of seasonal variation on phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) hybrids. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 295: 110865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110865 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110865
![]() |
[56] |
Al-Tamimi A, Alfarhan A, Al-Ansari A, et al. (2021) Antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory and apoptotic activities of alkaloid and flavonoid fractions of Amaranthus spinosus. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 116: 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101728 doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101728
![]() |
[57] |
Chen XM, Wang H, Huang XJ, et al. (2022) Efficient enrichment of total flavonoids from kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala L.) extracts by NKA-9 resin and antioxidant activities of flavonoids extract in vitro. Food Chem 374: 131508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131508 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131508
![]() |
[58] |
Asati V, Deepa PR, Sharma PK (2022) Desert legume Prosopis cineraria as a novel source of antioxidant flavonoids/isoflavonoids: Biochemical characterization of edible pods for potential functional food development. Biochem Biophys Rep 29: 101210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101210 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101210
![]() |
1. | E. Bimenyindavyi, L. Z. Khusnetdinova, O. A. Timofeeva, Phenolic Compounds of Plants Bidens tripartita (L.) and Bidens pilosa (L.) from Different Locations, 2023, 70, 1021-4437, 10.1134/S1021443723700243 | |
2. | E. Bimenyindavyi, L. Z. Khusnetdinova, O. A. Timofeeva, Phenolic Compounds of Plants Bidens tripartita (L.) and Bidens pilosa (L.) from Different Locations, 2023, 70, 0015-3303, 765, 10.31857/S001533032360081X | |
3. | Nevena Opačić, Sanja Radman, Mia Dujmović, Sanja Fabek Uher, Božidar Benko, Nina Toth, Marko Petek, Lepomir Čoga, Sandra Voća, Jana Šic Žlabur, Boosting nutritional quality of Urtica dioica L. to resist climate change, 2024, 15, 1664-462X, 10.3389/fpls.2024.1331327 |
Treatment combination | kg of N per ha | kg of K2O per ha |
N0K25 | 0 | 12.5 |
N100K25 | 46 | 12.5 |
N200K25 | 92 | 12.5 |
N100K0 | 46 | 0 |
N100K50 | 46 | 25 |
N100K100 | 46 | 50 |
Treatment combination | Plant height (cm) | Number of tillers | Number of leaves |
Chlorophyll reading value (SPAD) | Total plant weight (g) |
N0K25 | 36.32 ± 2.14a | 8.00 ± 5.29a | 27.00 ± 5.29a | 46.03 ± 6.56a | 78.00 ± 6.55b |
N100K25 | 40.58 ± 3.64a | 13.67 ±7.37a | 40.00 ± 9.98a | 47.65 ± 1.43a | 95.33 ± 7.50a |
N200K25 | 41.95 ± 1.72a | 8.00 ± 2.64a | 25.00 ± 2.64a | 47.80 ± 11.60a | 78.67 ± 8.08b |
N100K0 | 38.92 ± 1.59a | 10.17 ± 10.15a | 31.67 ± 10.15a | 37.33 ± 4.73b | 94.83 ± 14.25a |
N100K50 | 39.90 ± 2.03a | 10.83 ± 6.33a | 36.83 ± 6.33a | 37.00 ± 4.73b | 106.33 ± 12.66a |
N100K100 | 40.62 ± 2.27a | 10.67 ± 9.98a | 39.33 ± 7.37a | 35.33 ± 1.53b | 102.83 ± 10.34a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Number of bulbs | Diameter of bulb (cm) | Fresh bulb weight (g) |
N0K25 | 14.67 ± 1.3a | 1.75 ± 0.06a | 58.68 ± 6.11b |
N100K25 | 16.17 ± 2.4a | 1.76 ± 0.08a | 71.14 ± 5.29a |
N200K25 | 13.83 ± 1.5a | 1.75 ± 0.02a | 67.06 ± 2.64a |
N100K0 | 11.50 ± 2.6a | 1.81 ± 0.06a | 65.55 ± 8.75a |
N100K50 | 11.50 ± 0.9a | 1.86 ± 0.09a | 66.70 ± 5.76a |
N100K100 | 14.67 ± 4.5a | 1.75 ± 0.11a | 66.01 ± 7.28a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 2.694 ± 0.00dA | 2.740 ± 0.01aA | 0.253 ± 0.01cB |
N100K25 | 3.688 ± 0.00aA | 2.815 ± 0.00aB | 0.304 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 2.192 ± 0.01eA | 2.192 ± 0.01cA | 0.288 ± 0.00bB |
N100K0 | 3.032 ± 0.00cA | 1.474 ± 0.00dB | 0.251 ± 0.01cC |
N100K50 | 2.624 ± 0.01dA | 2.381 ± 0.00bB | 0.286 ± 0.01bC |
N100K100 | 3.150 ± 0.01bA | 1.940 ± 0.00bB | 0.219 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Total flavonoid content (mg QE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.398 ± 0.00cC | 0.779 ± 0.00bA | 0.651 ± 0.01bB |
N100K25 | 0.529 ± 0.01aC | 0.861 ± 0.02aA | 0.676 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.409 ± 0.00cC | 0.842 ± 0.02aA | 0.573 ± 0.01eB |
N100K0 | 0.464 ± 0.01bB | 0.616 ± 0.01dA | 0.617 ± 0.00dA |
N100K50 | 0.448 ± 0.01bC | 0.711 ± 0.01cA | 0.629 ± 0.00cB |
N100K100 | 0.399 ± 0.01cC | 0.722 ± 0.00cA | 0.572 ± 0.01eB |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | DPPH scavenging activity (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.232 ± 0.01bA | 0.221 ± 0.00cC | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
N100K25 | 0.318 ± 0.01aA | 0.305 ± 0.01aB | 0.153 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.339 ± 0.00aA | 0.253 ± 0.00bC | 0.105 ± 0.01cB |
N100K0 | 0.361 ± 0.01aA | 0.208 ± 0.00dB | 0.073 ± 0.01dC |
N100K50 | 0.215 ± 0.00bA | 0.219 ± 0.00cA | 0.097 ± 0.01cB |
N100K100 | 0.198 ± 0.01bA | 0.204 ± 0.00dB | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Ferric reducing antioxidant power (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 91.030 ± 0.00cB | 122.219 ± 0.00bA | 64.242 ± 0.00cC |
N100K25 | 104.757 ± 0.00aB | 123.810 ± 0.01aA | 65.477 ± 0.00bC |
N200K25 | 101.992 ± 0.00bB | 114.621 ± 0.00cA | 72.151 ± 0.00aC |
N100K0 | 90.712 ± 0.00cB | 103.393 ± 0.00fA | 61.856 ± 0.00dC |
N100K50 | 88.401 ± 0.01dB | 106.166 ± 0.00eA | 65.174 ± 0.00bC |
N100K100 | 87.545 ± 0.00dB | 109.681 ± 0.00dA | 61.598 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatment combination | kg of N per ha | kg of K2O per ha |
N0K25 | 0 | 12.5 |
N100K25 | 46 | 12.5 |
N200K25 | 92 | 12.5 |
N100K0 | 46 | 0 |
N100K50 | 46 | 25 |
N100K100 | 46 | 50 |
Treatment combination | Plant height (cm) | Number of tillers | Number of leaves |
Chlorophyll reading value (SPAD) | Total plant weight (g) |
N0K25 | 36.32 ± 2.14a | 8.00 ± 5.29a | 27.00 ± 5.29a | 46.03 ± 6.56a | 78.00 ± 6.55b |
N100K25 | 40.58 ± 3.64a | 13.67 ±7.37a | 40.00 ± 9.98a | 47.65 ± 1.43a | 95.33 ± 7.50a |
N200K25 | 41.95 ± 1.72a | 8.00 ± 2.64a | 25.00 ± 2.64a | 47.80 ± 11.60a | 78.67 ± 8.08b |
N100K0 | 38.92 ± 1.59a | 10.17 ± 10.15a | 31.67 ± 10.15a | 37.33 ± 4.73b | 94.83 ± 14.25a |
N100K50 | 39.90 ± 2.03a | 10.83 ± 6.33a | 36.83 ± 6.33a | 37.00 ± 4.73b | 106.33 ± 12.66a |
N100K100 | 40.62 ± 2.27a | 10.67 ± 9.98a | 39.33 ± 7.37a | 35.33 ± 1.53b | 102.83 ± 10.34a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Number of bulbs | Diameter of bulb (cm) | Fresh bulb weight (g) |
N0K25 | 14.67 ± 1.3a | 1.75 ± 0.06a | 58.68 ± 6.11b |
N100K25 | 16.17 ± 2.4a | 1.76 ± 0.08a | 71.14 ± 5.29a |
N200K25 | 13.83 ± 1.5a | 1.75 ± 0.02a | 67.06 ± 2.64a |
N100K0 | 11.50 ± 2.6a | 1.81 ± 0.06a | 65.55 ± 8.75a |
N100K50 | 11.50 ± 0.9a | 1.86 ± 0.09a | 66.70 ± 5.76a |
N100K100 | 14.67 ± 4.5a | 1.75 ± 0.11a | 66.01 ± 7.28a |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; The Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 2.694 ± 0.00dA | 2.740 ± 0.01aA | 0.253 ± 0.01cB |
N100K25 | 3.688 ± 0.00aA | 2.815 ± 0.00aB | 0.304 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 2.192 ± 0.01eA | 2.192 ± 0.01cA | 0.288 ± 0.00bB |
N100K0 | 3.032 ± 0.00cA | 1.474 ± 0.00dB | 0.251 ± 0.01cC |
N100K50 | 2.624 ± 0.01dA | 2.381 ± 0.00bB | 0.286 ± 0.01bC |
N100K100 | 3.150 ± 0.01bA | 1.940 ± 0.00bB | 0.219 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Total flavonoid content (mg QE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.398 ± 0.00cC | 0.779 ± 0.00bA | 0.651 ± 0.01bB |
N100K25 | 0.529 ± 0.01aC | 0.861 ± 0.02aA | 0.676 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.409 ± 0.00cC | 0.842 ± 0.02aA | 0.573 ± 0.01eB |
N100K0 | 0.464 ± 0.01bB | 0.616 ± 0.01dA | 0.617 ± 0.00dA |
N100K50 | 0.448 ± 0.01bC | 0.711 ± 0.01cA | 0.629 ± 0.00cB |
N100K100 | 0.399 ± 0.01cC | 0.722 ± 0.00cA | 0.572 ± 0.01eB |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | DPPH scavenging activity (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 0.232 ± 0.01bA | 0.221 ± 0.00cC | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
N100K25 | 0.318 ± 0.01aA | 0.305 ± 0.01aB | 0.153 ± 0.01aB |
N200K25 | 0.339 ± 0.00aA | 0.253 ± 0.00bC | 0.105 ± 0.01cB |
N100K0 | 0.361 ± 0.01aA | 0.208 ± 0.00dB | 0.073 ± 0.01dC |
N100K50 | 0.215 ± 0.00bA | 0.219 ± 0.00cA | 0.097 ± 0.01cB |
N100K100 | 0.198 ± 0.01bA | 0.204 ± 0.00dB | 0.143 ± 0.01bA |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–e, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |
Treatments | Ferric reducing antioxidant power (µmol TE/g DW) | ||
Aqueous | Ethanol | n-Hexane | |
N0K25 | 91.030 ± 0.00cB | 122.219 ± 0.00bA | 64.242 ± 0.00cC |
N100K25 | 104.757 ± 0.00aB | 123.810 ± 0.01aA | 65.477 ± 0.00bC |
N200K25 | 101.992 ± 0.00bB | 114.621 ± 0.00cA | 72.151 ± 0.00aC |
N100K0 | 90.712 ± 0.00cB | 103.393 ± 0.00fA | 61.856 ± 0.00dC |
N100K50 | 88.401 ± 0.01dB | 106.166 ± 0.00eA | 65.174 ± 0.00bC |
N100K100 | 87.545 ± 0.00dB | 109.681 ± 0.00dA | 61.598 ± 0.00dC |
Note: Each value is expressed as the mean plus standard deviation; a–d, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each column denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; A–C, the Scott-Knott test indicates that the mean values in each row denoted by different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05; For the treatment combination, see Table 1. |