Research article Topical Sections

The prevalence of aflatoxins in different nut samples: A global systematic review and probabilistic risk assessment

  • Aflatoxins are secondary carcinogenic fungal metabolites derived from the toxic various Aspergillus species. These fungi can easily infect nuts and grains. A global systematic review was done to extract data on the concentration of aflatoxins in different nuts. Besides, risk assessment was conducted on data. The scientific databases were searched systematically from 2000 to 2020. Based on the results, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) had the most frequency in nut samples. The mean concentration of aflatoxin total (AFT) and AFB1 in nuts were as follows: peanut (37.85, 32.82 μg/kg), pistachio (31.42, 39.44 μg/kg), almond (3.54, 3.93 μg/kg), walnut (42.27, 22.23 μg/kg), hazelnut (17.33, 10.54 μg/kg), Brazil nut (4.61, 3.35 μg/kg), and other nuts (26.22, 7.38 μg/kg). According to country the margin of exposure (MOE) value for adult was as Argentina (21) > Congo (67) > India (117) > Bangladesh (175) > Cameroon (238) > Iran (357) > Bahrain (438) > Brazil (447) > Ghana (606) > South Africa (1017) > Egypt (1176) > USA (1505) > China (1526) > Cyprus (1588). The MOE of the consumers in some countries was considerably below the safety margin of 10,000. To conclude, nuts are highly consumed by different consumers, so it is necessary to emphasize strict control measures to prevent contamination of these foods with aflatoxins.

    Citation: Arezoo Ebrahimi, Alireza Emadi, Majid Arabameri, Ahmad Jayedi, Anna Abdolshahi, Behdad Shokrolahi Yancheshmeh, Nabi Shariatifar. The prevalence of aflatoxins in different nut samples: A global systematic review and probabilistic risk assessment[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 130-148. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022009

    Related Papers:

    [1] Alma Mašić, Hermann J. Eberl . On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with wall attached and suspended bacteria. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 1139-1166. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1139
    [2] Maryam Basiri, Frithjof Lutscher, Abbas Moameni . Traveling waves in a free boundary problem for the spread of ecosystem engineers. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(1): 152-184. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025008
    [3] Fadoua El Moustaid, Amina Eladdadi, Lafras Uys . Modeling bacterial attachment to surfaces as an early stage of biofilm development. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 821-842. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.821
    [4] Ana I. Muñoz, José Ignacio Tello . Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of a model of morphogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 1035-1059. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1035
    [5] Fabiana Russo, Alberto Tenore, Maria Rosaria Mattei, Luigi Frunzo . Multiscale modelling of the start-up process of anammox-based granular reactors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10374-10406. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022486
    [6] Peter W. Bates, Jianing Chen, Mingji Zhang . Dynamics of ionic flows via Poisson-Nernst-Planck systems with local hard-sphere potentials: Competition between cations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3736-3766. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020210
    [7] Chiu-Yen Kao, Yuan Lou, Eiji Yanagida . Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 315-335. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.315
    [8] Nikodem J. Poplawski, Abbas Shirinifard, Maciej Swat, James A. Glazier . Simulation of single-species bacterial-biofilm growth using the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg model and the CompuCell3D modeling environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 355-388. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.355
    [9] Min Zhu, Xiaofei Guo, Zhigui Lin . The risk index for an SIR epidemic model and spatial spreading of the infectious disease. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1565-1583. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017081
    [10] Blaise Faugeras, Olivier Maury . An advection-diffusion-reaction size-structured fish population dynamics model combined with a statistical parameter estimation procedure: Application to the Indian Ocean skipjack tuna fishery. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(4): 719-741. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.719
  • Aflatoxins are secondary carcinogenic fungal metabolites derived from the toxic various Aspergillus species. These fungi can easily infect nuts and grains. A global systematic review was done to extract data on the concentration of aflatoxins in different nuts. Besides, risk assessment was conducted on data. The scientific databases were searched systematically from 2000 to 2020. Based on the results, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) had the most frequency in nut samples. The mean concentration of aflatoxin total (AFT) and AFB1 in nuts were as follows: peanut (37.85, 32.82 μg/kg), pistachio (31.42, 39.44 μg/kg), almond (3.54, 3.93 μg/kg), walnut (42.27, 22.23 μg/kg), hazelnut (17.33, 10.54 μg/kg), Brazil nut (4.61, 3.35 μg/kg), and other nuts (26.22, 7.38 μg/kg). According to country the margin of exposure (MOE) value for adult was as Argentina (21) > Congo (67) > India (117) > Bangladesh (175) > Cameroon (238) > Iran (357) > Bahrain (438) > Brazil (447) > Ghana (606) > South Africa (1017) > Egypt (1176) > USA (1505) > China (1526) > Cyprus (1588). The MOE of the consumers in some countries was considerably below the safety margin of 10,000. To conclude, nuts are highly consumed by different consumers, so it is necessary to emphasize strict control measures to prevent contamination of these foods with aflatoxins.



    The electronic medical records (EMRs), sometimes called electronic health records (EHRs) or electronic patient records (EPRs), is one of the most important types of clinical data and often contains valuable and detailed patient information for many clinical applications. This paper studies the technology of structuring EMRs and medical information extraction, which are key foundations for health-related various applications.

    As a kind of medical information extraction technology, the medical assertion classification (MAC) in EMRs, which is formally defined for the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, aims to recognize the relationship between medical entities (Disease and Symptom) and patients. Given a medical problem or entity mentioned in a clinical text, an assertion classifier must look at the context and choose the status of how the medical problem pertains to the patient by assigning one of seven labels: present, absent, conditional, possible, family, occasional, or history. The assertion is reflected in two aspects: whether the entity occurs to the patient, and how the entity occurs to the patient. As the basis of medical information processing, assertion classification in EMRs is of great importance to many EMRs mining tasks. When there are many researches about MAC for English EMRs, few studies have been done on Chinese texts.

    Based on the above, we study the MAC methods for Chinese EMRs in this paper. According to the corresponding task of the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, we divide the assertion categories of medical entity into seven categories: present (当前的), possible (可能的), conditional (有条件的), family (非患者的), occasional (偶有的), absent (否认的) and history (既往的). The definitions and Chinese sentence examples of different kind of assertion category are shown in the Table 1.

    Table 1.  Definition of assertion categories.
    Category Definition Example sentence
    Present Symptoms or illness that must be present in the patient 患者意识昏迷8小时(The patient was unconscious for 8 hours.)
    Absent A denial of illness or symptoms 患者无眩晕头痛(No vertigo, no headache)
    Conditional A condition or illness that occurs only under certain conditions 饮酒后易休克(Shock after drinking)
    Possible Possible disease or symptom 术后可能有红肿现象(Postoperative redness may occur)
    肿瘤待查(Tumor waiting for investigation)
    Family A condition or condition that is not the patient's own 直系亲属患有癫痫病史(History of epilepsy in immediate relatives)
    Occasional An illness or symptom that does not currently occur frequently 偶有头晕症状(Occasionally dizziness)
    History Past illnesses or symptoms 2年前因痛风入我院治疗(Gout was admitted to our hospital two years ago for treatment)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Although there have been lot of methods proposed for recognizing entity assertion category from EMRs, most of them used traditional machine methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Conditional Random Field (CRF), which are mainly based on feature engineering. However, feature engineering is relatively time-consuming and costly, and resulting feature sets are both domain and model-specific. While deep neural network approaches on various medical information extraction tasks have achieved better performance compared to traditional machine learning models, research on entity assertion classification of EMRs using deep neural network model is still few.

    Therefore, this paper proposes a novel model for MAC of Chinese EMRs. We build a deep network (called GRU-Softmax) as baseline, which combines Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network (a type of Recurrent Neural Networks, RNNs) and softmax, to classify named entity assertion from Chinese EMR. Compared with RNN, the advantage of GRU-Softmax lie in that GRU neural networks have strong expressive ability to capture long context without time-intensive feature engineering.

    Furthermore, in order to obtain character level characteristics in EMRs text, we train Chinese character-level embedding representation using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and combine them with word-level embedding vector acquired from large-scale background training corpus. Then the combined vectors are sent to GRU architecture to train entity assertion classification model. In addition, to enhance the representation and distinguish ability of characters and their contexts, we integrate the medical knowledge attention (MKA) learned from entity names and their definition or descriptions in medical dictionary bases (MDBs) in the model.

    On the whole, the contributions of this work can be summarized as follow: (1) we introduce a deep neural network that combines GRU neural networks and Sfotmax to classify medical assertion at first time; (2) We compared the influence of character-level representation extracted by CNN on the model; (3) we use medical knowledge attention (MKA) to integrate entity representation from external knowledge (medical dictionary bases, MDBs).

    The remainder of this paper is composed as follows. In section 2 we summarize the related work about MAC. In section 3 we present our attention-based CNN-GRU-Softmax network model for MAC in Chinese EMRs. In section 4 we show the experimental results and give some analysis. Finally, we summarize our work and outline some ideas for future research.

    Research of entity assertion classification is to study the relation classification between entity and patient on the basis of entity known. Chapman et al. [1] proposed a classification model named as NegEx based on regular expression rules, which classifies disease entity as "existing" or "nonexistent", and can obtain 85.3% of F value on more than 1000 disease entities. Based on NegEx method and combining regular expression rules and trigger words, Harkema et al. [2] proposed the ConText method to classify the disease entities into one of six categories. On six different types of medical records, 76% to 93% of F values could be obtained, indicating that the distribution of modified disease entities varied greatly in different styles of texts.

    Based on the evaluation data of the 2010 i2b2 Challenge, researchers proposed many classification methods based on rules, SVM, CRF, etc. The most effective concept extraction systems used support vector machines (SVMs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], either with contextual information and dictionaries that indicate negation, uncertainty, and family history [6,10], or with the output of rule-based systems [3,6,8]. Roberts et al. [4] and Chang et al. [11] utilized both medical dictionary and rules. Chang et al. complemented SVM with logistic regression, multi-logistic regression, and boosting, which they combined using voting mechanism. The highest classification effect in the evaluation was obtained by the Bi-level classifier proposed by de Bruijn et al. [5], who used the cTAKES knowledge base created an ensemble whose final output was determined by a multi-class SVM, and the evaluation result F could reach 93.6%. Clark et al. [12] used a CRF model to determine negation and uncertainty with their scope, and added sets of rules to separate documents into different zones, to identify and scope cue phrases, and determine phrase status. They combined the results from the found cues and the phrase status module with a maximum entropy classifier that also used concept and contextual features.

    In this paper, we propose a neural network architecture combining GRU-CNN-Softmax network with Medical Knowledge Attention that will learn the shared semantics between medical record texts and the mentioned entities in the medical dictionary bases (MDBs). The architecture of our proposed model is shown in Figure 1. After querying pretrained character embedding tables, the input sentence will be transformed respectively to the corresponding sequences of pretrained character embeddings and random generated character embedding matrixes for every character. Then a CNN is used to form the character level representation and a GRU is used to encode the sentence representation after concatenating the pretrained character embeddings and character-level representation of the sentence. Afterwards, we treat the entity information from MKBs as a query guidance and integrate them with the original sentence representation using a multi-modal fusion gate and a filtering gate. At last, a Softmax layer is used to classify.

    Figure 1.  The framework of our model. The right part is the GMF and Filtering Gate.

    As described in Figure 2, we firstly train Chinese character embeddings from a large unlabeled Chinese EMR corpus, then CNN is used to generate sentence character-level representation from the character embedding matrix sequence to alleviate rare character problems and capture helpful morphological information like special characters in EMRs. Since the length of sentences is not consistent, a placeholder (padding) is added to the left and right side of character embeddings matrix to make the length of every sentence character-level representation vector matrix sequence equal.

    Figure 2.  Character-level representation of a sentence by CNN.

    The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is a branch of the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Like LSTM, it is proposed to solve such problems as the gradient in long-term memory and reverse propagation. We choose to use GRU [13] in our model since it performs similarly to LSTM [14] but is computationally cheaper.

    The GRU model is defined by the following equations:

    zt=σ(Wzxt+Uzht1+bz) (1)
    rt=σ(Wrxt+Urht1+br) (2)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (3)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (4)

    In particular, zt and rt are vectors corresponding to the update and reset gates respectively, where * denotes elementwise multiplication. The activations of both gates are elementwise logistic sigmoid functions σ(), constraining the values of zt and rt ranging from 0 to 1. ht represents the output state vector for the current time framet, while ˜ht% is the candidate state obtained with a hyperbolic tangent. The network is fed by the current input vectorxt(sentence representation of previous layer), and the parameters of the model are Wz, Wr, Wh (the feed-forward connections), Uz, Ur, Uh(the recurrent weights), and the bias vectors bz, br, bh. The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is shown in Figure 3.

    Figure 3.  The architecture of gate recurrent unit (GRU).

    Concerning rich entity mention and definition information containing in MDBs, the medical knowledge attention is applied to integrate entity representations learned from external knowledge bases as query vector for encoding. We use a medical dictionary to encode entity information (entity mention and definition) into attention scores as entity embeddings.

    at=f(eWAht) (5)

    Where e is the embedding for entity, and WA is a bi-linear parameter matrix. We simply choose the quadratic function f(x) = x2, which is positive definite and easily differentiate.

    Based on the output of GRU and attention scoring, we design a gated multimodal fusion (GMF) method to fuse the features from output of hidden layerhtand attention scoringat. When predicting the entity tag of a character, the GMF trades off how much new information of the network is considering from the query vector with the EMR text containing the character. The GMF is defined as:

    hat=tanh(Watat+bat) (6)
    hht=tanh(Whtht+bht) (7)
    gt=σ(Wgt(hathht)) (8)
    mt=gthat+(1gt)hht (9)

    where Wat, Wht, Wgt are parameters, hht and hat are the new sentence vector and new query vector respectively, after transformation by single layer perceptron. is the concatenating operation, σ is the logistic sigmoid activation, gt is the gate applied to the new query vector hht, and mt is the multi-modal fused feature from the new medical knowledge feature and the new textual feature.

    When decoding the combination of the multimodal fusion feature mt at position t, the impact and necessity of the external medical knowledge feature for different assertion is different. Because the multimodal fusion feature contains external knowledge feature more or less and it may introduce some noise. We therefore use a filtering gate to combine different features from different signal that better represent the useful information. The filtering gate is a scalar in the range of [0, 1] and its value depends on how much the multimodal fusion feature is helpful to label the tag of the assertion. stand the input feature to the decoder ˆmt are defined as follows:

    st=σ(Wst,htht(Wmt,stmt+bmt,st)) (10)
    ut=st(tanh(Wmtmt+bmt)) (11)
    ˆmt=Wˆmt(htut) (12)

    where Wmt,st, Wst,ht, Wmt, Wˆmt are parameters, ht is the hidden state of bidirectional LSTM at time t, ut is the reserved multimodal features after the filtering gate filter out noise, andis the concatenating operation. The architecture of gated multimodal fusion and filtering gate are shown in Figure 1.

    After we get the representation ˆmt of sentence, we use softmax function to normalize and output entity assertion probability.

    In this section, we evaluate our method on a manually annotated dataset. Following Nadeau et al., we use Precision, Recall, and F1 to evaluate the performance of the models [18].

    We use our own manually annotated corpus as evaluation dataset, which consists of 800 de-identified EMR texts from different clinical departments of a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. The annotated entity number of every entity assertion category in the dataset is shown in the Table 2.

    Table 2.  Number statistics of different entity assertion categories in the evaluation dataset.
    Category Training Test Total
    Present (当前的) 2025 1013 3038
    Absent (否认的) 1877 921 2799
    Conditional (有条件的) 204 102 306
    Possible (可能的) 844 420 1264
    Family (非患者本人的) 235 117 352
    Occasional (偶有的) 249 147 396
    History (既往的) 342 171 513
    Total 5778 2889 8667

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We use Google's Word2Vec to train Chinese character embeddings on our 30 thousand unlabeled Chinese EMR texts which is from a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. Random generated character embeddings are initialized with uniform samples from[3dim,3dim], where we set dim = 30.

    Table 3 gives the chosen hyper-parameters for all experiments. We tune the hyper-parameters on the development set by random search. We try to share as many hyper-parameters as possible in experiments.

    Table 3.  Parameter Setting.
    Parameter Value
    Character-level representation size 50
    Pretrained character Embedding Size 100
    Learning Size 0.014
    Decay Rate 0.05
    Dropout 0.5
    Batch Size 10
    CNN Window Size 3
    CNN Number of filters 50

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this part, we describe all of models in the following experimental comparison.

    GRU+Softmax: We combine gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural network and Sfotmaxto classify assertion of clinical named entity. In this model, the GRU neural network is used to help encoding character embedding vector and then the Softmax layer is used to decode and classify. To compare the impact of different methods on experimental performance, we will use this model as the baseline.

    CNN+GRU+Softmax: This model is similar to the CNN-LSTM-CRF which was proposed by Ma and Hovy (2016)[15] and is a truly end-to-end system.

    CGAtS(CNN+GRU+Attention+Softmax): This model is the CNN-GRU-Softmax architecture enhanced by medical knowledge attention (MKA). In this model the output of hidden layer h and the attention score a are used to encode text representation as follows:

    c=Li=1aihi (13)

    where L is the window size of text characters.

    CGAtFuFiS(CNN+GRU+Softmax+All): This is our model. Unlike the previous one, we employed a gated multi-modal fusion (GMF) mechanism and a filtration gate.

    The performance on each of seven categories obtained by all models are shown in Figure 4, and their overall performance on the evaluation dataset is shown in Table 4.

    Figure 4.  Experimental results of different assertion categories.
    Table 4.  Performance of different models on the total evaluation dataset.
    Model Precision (%) Recall (%) F1 (%)
    Softmax 89.13 88.31 88.72
    GRU+Softmax(Baseline) 90.21 90.77 90.49
    CNN-GRU-Softmax 92.95 89.65 91.27
    CGAtS 90.76 93.34 92.03
    CGAtFuFiS 92.19 93.48 92.84

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We compare our model with the baseline. Table 4 shows the overall assertion classification performance obtained by our method and others, from which we can see that our model CGAtFuFiS obtains the best F1-score of 92.84%.

    The experimental results of different models on our manually annotated datasets are shown in Table 4 and 5. Compared with the baseline model, all other models have improved performance and the updated neural network model is better than the traditional machine learning methods on the MAC task.

    The convolution layer in convolution neural network can well describe the local features of characters, and the most representative part of the local features can be further extracted through the pooling layer. Therefore, our experimental results show that CNN-GRU-Softmax model is superior to GRU-CRF model.The performance of the CGAtS model is better than CNN-GRU-Softmax. This result shows that, the rich information of entities and their corresponding semantic definition from MDBs is surely useful for MAC. CGAtFuFiS model is slightly better than CGAtS model and indicates that for the clinical NER task in Chinese EMRs it is helpful to fuse the features from EMR text context with the external knowledge dictionary utilizing gated multimodal fusion (GMF). Since supplement of external information in MKBs sometimes causes noise to the model, we therefore use a filtering gate to combine and weight different features. As shown by the experimental results, the filtering gate is helpful to improve the overall performance of our model.

    Due to the sublanguage characteristic of Chinese EMRs, the expression of clinical named entity is very different from those in general text. Using the entity information contained in the MABs as the classification query vector can lead the decoder to focus on the entity itself. We combine text itself and MABs features together with a multi-modal fusion gate as the query vector, then set up a filtering gate to filter out useless feature information. The experimental results show that our model CGAtFuFiS, which integrates CNN, GRU, medical knowledge attention, gated multimodal fusion, filtering gate, and Softmax, achieves the best F1 score on the evaluation corpus.

    In this work, we proposed a medical knowledge-attention enhanced neural clinical entity assertion classification model, which makes use of the external MABs in the way of attention mechanism. A gated multi-modal fusion module is introduced to decide how much MABs information is fused into the query vector at each time step. We further introduced a filtering gate module to adaptively adjust how much multi-modal information can be considered at each time step. The experimental results on the manually annotated Chinese EMR evaluation dataset show that our proposed approach improved the performance of MAC task obviously compared to other baseline models.

    In the future, we will explore a fine-grained clinical entity classification model for Chinese EMRs and method to extract entity semantic relation in Chinese EMRs.

    We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 61762081, No.61662067, No. 61662068) and the Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (No. 17YF1GA016).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Witkowska AM, Waśkiewicz A, Zujko ME, et al. (2019) The consumption of nuts is associated with better dietary and lifestyle patterns in polish adults: results of WOBASZ and WOBASZ Ⅱ surveys. Nutrients 11: 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061410 doi: 10.3390/nu11061410
    [2] Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, et al. (2015) Global, regional and national consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys worldwide. BMJ Open 5: e008705. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008705 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008705
    [3] Neale EP, Tran G, Brown RC (2020) Barriers and facilitators to nut consumption: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 9127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239127 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239127
    [4] Blomhoff R, Carlsen MH, Andersen LF, et al. (2006) Health benefits of nuts: potential role of antioxidants. Br J Nutr 96: S52-S60. https://doi.org/10.1017/BJN20061864 doi: 10.1017/BJN20061864
    [5] Sheridan MJ, Cooper JN, Erario M, et al. (2007) Pistachio nut consumption and serum lipid levels. J Am Coll Nutr 26: 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2007.10719595 doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719595
    [6] Varga J, Frisvad JC, Samson R (2011) Two new aflatoxin producing species, and an overview of Aspergillus section Flavi. Stud Mycol 69: 57-80. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2011.69.05 doi: 10.3114/sim.2011.69.05
    [7] Pildain MB, Frisvad JC, Vaamonde G, et al. (2008) Two novel aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species from Argentinean peanuts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65123-0 doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65123-0
    [8] Mutegi C, Ngugi H, Hendriks S, et al. (2009) Prevalence and factors associated with aflatoxin contamination of peanuts from Western Kenya. Int J Food Microbiol 130: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.030 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.030
    [9] Ammida N, Micheli L, Piermarini S, et al. (2006) Detection of aflatoxin B1 in barley: Comparative study of immunosensor and HPLC. Anal Lett 39: 1559-1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032710600713248 doi: 10.1080/00032710600713248
    [10] Afsah-Hejri L, Jinap S, Arzandeh S, et al. (2011) Optimization of HPLC conditions for quantitative analysis of aflatoxins in contaminated peanut. Food Control 22: 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.007
    [11] Misihairabgwi J, Ezekiel C, Sulyok M, et al. (2019) Mycotoxin contamination of foods in Southern Africa: A 10-year review (2007-2016). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1357003 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1357003
    [12] Sharma S, Gupta D, Sharma YP (2015) Natural Incidence of Aflatoxins, Ochratoxin A, Patulin and Their Co-Occurrence in Chilgoza Pine Nuts Marketed in Jammu, India. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 85: 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0326-7 doi: 10.1007/s40011-014-0326-7
    [13] Wang Y, Nie J, Yan Z, et al. (2018) Occurrence and co-occurrence of mycotoxins in nuts and dried fruits from China. Food Control 88: 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.013 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.013
    [14] Kazemi A, Mohtadi Nia J, Vahed Jabbari M, et al. (2007) Survey of food stuff to carcinogenic mycotoxins. The 3rd Congress of Medical Plants 24: 386.
    [15] Cheraghali A, Yazdanpanah H, Doraki N, et al. (2007) Incidence of aflatoxins in Iran pistachio nuts. Food Chem Toxicol 45: 812-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.026 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.026
    [16] Medina A, Gilbert MK, Mack BM, et al. (2017) Interactions between water activity and temperature on the Aspergillus flavus transcriptome and aflatoxin B1 production. Int J Food Microbiol 256: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.05.020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.05.020
    [17] Petroczi A, Nepusz T, Taylor G, et al. (2011) Network analysis of the RASFF database: a mycotoxin perspective. World Mycotoxin J 4: 329-338. https://doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2010.1271 doi: 10.3920/WMJ2010.1271
    [18] Molyneux RJ, Mahoney N, Kim JH, et al. (2007) Mycotoxins in edible tree nuts. Int J Food Microbiol 119: 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.028 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.028
    [19] International Agency for Research on Cancer (1993) Some naturally occurring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins: World Health Organization.
    [20] IARC (2012) Aflatoxins, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks on Humans.
    [21] Wogan G (1975) Dietary factors and special epidemiological situations of liver cancer in Thailand and Africa. Cancer Res 35: 3499-3502.
    [22] International Agency for Research on Cancer (2002) Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene: World Health Organization.
    [23] Villa P, Markaki P (2009) Aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A in breakfast cereals from Athens market: occurrence and risk assessment. Food Control 20: 455-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.012
    [24] Chiavaro E, Dall'Asta C, Galaverna G, et al. (2001) New reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method to detect aflatoxins in food and feed with cyclodextrins as fluorescence enhancers added to the eluent. J Chromatogr A 937: 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01300-0 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01300-0
    [25] Juan C, Ritieni A, Mañes J (2012) Determination of trichothecenes and zearalenones in grain cereal, flour and bread by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 134: 2389-2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.051 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.051
    [26] Yu FY, Gribas AV, Vdovenko MM, et al. (2013) Development of ultrasensitive direct chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for determination of aflatoxin B1 in food products. Talanta 107: 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2012.12.047 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.12.047
    [27] Ghaednia B, Bayat M, Sohrabi Haghdoost I, et al. (2013) Effects of aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, health indices, phagocytic activity and histopathological alteration in Fenneropenaeus indicus. Iran J Fish Sci 12: 723-737.
    [28] Nakai VK, de Oliveira Rocha L, Gonçalez E, et al. (2008) Distribution of fungi and aflatoxins in a stored peanut variety. Food Chem 106: 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.087 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.087
    [29] Marin S, Ramos A, Cano-Sancho G, et al. (2013) Mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 60: 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.047 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.047
    [30] Chain EPoCitF, Schrenk D, Bignami M, et al. (2020) Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food. EFSA Journal 18: e06040. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6040 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6040
    [31] Jahanbakhsh M, Afshar A, Momeni Feeli S, et al. (2021) Probabilistic health risk assessment (Monte Carlo simulation method) and prevalence of aflatoxin B1 in wheat flours of Iran. Int J Environ Anal Chem 101: 1074-1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1676421 doi: 10.1080/03067319.2019.1676421
    [32] Karimi F, Shariatifar N, Rezaei M, et al. (2021) Quantitative measurement of toxic metals and assessment of health risk in agricultural products food from Markazi Province of Iran. Int J Food Contam 8: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-021-00083-0 doi: 10.1186/s40550-021-00083-0
    [33] Kiani A, Ahmadloo M, Moazzen M, et al. (2021) Monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and probabilistic health risk assessment in yogurt and butter in Iran. Food Sci Nutr 9: 2114-2128. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2180 doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2180
    [34] Yaminifar S, Aeenehvand S, Ghelichkhani G, et al. (2021) The measurement and health risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls in butter samples using the QuEChERS/GC-MS method. Int J Dairy Technol 74:737-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12805 doi: 10.1111/1471-0307.12805
    [35] EPA (2015) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Quantitative Risk Assessment Calculations, National Academy Press, Washington 13: 7-9.
    [36] Nabizadeh S, Shariatifar N, Shokoohi E, et al. (2018) Prevalence and probabilistic health risk assessment of aflatoxins B 1, B 2, G 1, and G 2 in Iranian edible oils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 35562-35570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3510-0 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3510-0
    [37] Akbari-Adergani B, Poorasad M, Esfandiari Z (2018) Sunset yellow, tartrazine and sodium benzoate in orange juice distributed in Iranian market and subsequent exposure assessment. Int Food Res J 25: 975-981.
    [38] Rasouli Z, Akbari-Adergani B (2016) Assessment of aspartame exposure due to consumption of some imported chewing gums by microwave digestion and high performance liquid chromatography analysis. Orient J Chem 32: 1649-1658. https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/320342 doi: 10.13005/ojc/320342
    [39] EPA (2010) Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) Approach to Substances in Food that are Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Example: Benzo[a]pyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) Approach to Substances in Food that are Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Example: Benzo[a]pyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 48: 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.09.039
    [40] Authority EFS (2007) Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain[CONTAM] related to the potential increase of consumer health risk by a possible increase of the existing maximum levels for aflatoxins in almonds, hazelnuts and pistachios and derived products. EFSA Journal 5: 446. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.446 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2007.446
    [41] Foerster C, Muñoz K, Delgado-Rivera L, et al. (2020) Occurrence of relevant mycotoxins in food commodities consumed in Chile. Mycotoxin Res 36: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00369-5 doi: 10.1007/s12550-019-00369-5
    [42] US Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume Ⅲ. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/rags3adt_complete.pdf
    [43] Saghafi M, Shariatifar N, Alizadeh Sani M, et al. (2021) Analysis and probabilistic health risk assessment of some trace elements contamination and sulphur dioxide residual in raisins. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2021: 1986037. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1986037 doi: 10.1080/03067319.2021.1986037
    [44] Moazzen M, Shariatifar N, Arabameri M, et al. (2022) Measurement of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Baby Food Samples in Tehran, Iran With Magnetic-Solid-Phase-Extraction and Gas-Chromatography/Mass-Spectrometry Method: A Health Risk Assessment. Front Nutr 9: 833158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.833158 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.833158
    [45] Shariatifar N, Moazzen M, Arabameri M, et al. (2021) Measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in edible mushrooms (raw, grilled and fried) using MSPE-GC/MS method: a risk assessment study. Appl Biol Chem 64: 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00634-1 doi: 10.1186/s13765-021-00634-1
    [46] Rezaei H, Moazzen M, Shariatifar N, et al. (2021) Measurement of phthalate acid esters in non-alcoholic malt beverages by MSPE-GC/MS method in Tehran city: chemometrics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 51897-51907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14290-x doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14290-x
    [47] Yaminifar S, Aeenehvand S, Ghelichkhani G, et al. (2021) The measurement and health risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls in butter samples using the QuEChERS/GC-MS method. Int J Dairy Technol 74: 737-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12805 doi: 10.1111/1471-0307.12805
    [48] Moradi M, Bolandi M, Arabameri M, et al. (2021) Semi-volume gluten-free bread: effect of guar gum, sodium caseinate and transglutaminase enzyme on the quality parameters. J Food Meas Charact 15: 2344-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00823-y doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00823-y
    [49] Heydarieh A, Arabameri M, Ebrahimi A, et al. (2020) Determination of Magnesium, Calcium and Sulphate Ion Impurities in Commercial Edible Salt. J Chem Health Risks 10: 93-102. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/jchr.2020.1883343.1067 doi: 10.22034/jchr.2020.1883343.1067
    [50] Diella G, Caggiano G, Ferrieri F, et al. (2018) Aflatoxin contamination in nuts marketed in Italy: Preliminary results. Ann Ig 30: 401-409.
    [51] Ding XX, Li PW, Bai YZ, et al. (2012) Aflatoxin B-1 in post-harvest peanuts and dietary risk in China. Food Control 23: 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.06.026 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.06.026
    [52] El tawila MM, Neamatallah A, Serdar SA (2013) Incidence of aflatoxins in commercial nuts in the holy city of Mekkah. Food Control 29: 121-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.004
    [53] Christofidou M, Kafouris D, Christodoulou M, et al. (2015) Occurrence, surveillance, and control of mycotoxins in food in Cyprus for the years 2004-2013. Food Agric Immunol 26: 880-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2015.1039499 doi: 10.1080/09540105.2015.1039499
    [54] Hoeltz M, Einloft TC, Oldoni VP, et al. (2012) The occurrence of aflatoxin B 1 contamination in peanuts and peanut products marketed in southern brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 55: 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132012000200019 doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132012000200019
    [55] Commission CA (1995) Codex general standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. Codex Standard 193: 1-14.
    [56] Fernández Pinto V, Patriarca A, Locani O, et al. (2001) Natural co-occurrence of aflatoxin and cyclopiazonic acid in peanuts grown in Argentina. Food Addit Contam 18: 1017-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030110057125 doi: 10.1080/02652030110057125
    [57] Freitas VP, Brigido BM (1998) Occurrence of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in peanuts and their products marketed in the region of Campinas, Brazil in 1995 and 1996. Food Addit Contam 15: 807-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652039809374714 doi: 10.1080/02652039809374714
    [58] Liu Y, Wu F (2010) Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: a risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 118: 818-824. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901388 doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901388
    [59] Sabran MR, Jamaluddin R, Mutalib MSA (2012) Screening of aflatoxin M1, a metabolite of aflatoxin B1 in human urine samples in Malaysia: a preliminary study. Food Control 28: 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.048 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.048
    [60] Zhang W, Liu Y, Liang B, et al. (2020) Probabilistic risk assessment of dietary exposure to aflatoxin B 1 in Guangzhou, China. Sci Rep 10: 7973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64295-8 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64295-8
    [61] Taghizadeh SF, Rezaee R, Badibostan H, et al. (2020) Aflatoxin B1 in walnuts: a probabilistic cancer risk assessment for Iranians. Toxicol Environ Chem 2020: 1791868. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2020.1791868 doi: 10.1080/02772248.2020.1791868
    [62] Do TH, Tran SC, Le CD, et al. (2020) Dietary exposure and health risk characterization of aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, fumonisin B1, and zearalenone in food from different provinces in Northern Vietnam. Food Control 112: 107108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107108 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107108
    [63] Cano-Sancho G, Marin S, Ramos A, et al. (2010) Biomonitoring of Fusarium spp. mycotoxins: perspectives for an individual exposure assessment tool. Food Sci Technol Int 16: 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013210368884 doi: 10.1177/1082013210368884
  • agrfood-07-01-009-Supplementary.pdf
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Babita Pandey, Devendra Kumar Pandey, Brijendra Pratap Mishra, Wasiur Rhmann, A comprehensive survey of deep learning in the field of medical imaging and medical natural language processing: Challenges and research directions, 2021, 13191578, 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.007
    2. Lizong Deng, Luming Chen, Tao Yang, Mi Liu, Shicheng Li, Taijiao Jiang, Constructing High-Fidelity Phenotype Knowledge Graphs for Infectious Diseases With a Fine-Grained Semantic Information Model: Development and Usability Study, 2021, 23, 1438-8871, e26892, 10.2196/26892
    3. Marta B. Fernandes, Navid Valizadeh, Haitham S. Alabsi, Syed A. Quadri, Ryan A. Tesh, Abigail A. Bucklin, Haoqi Sun, Aayushee Jain, Laura N. Brenner, Elissa Ye, Wendong Ge, Sarah I. Collens, Stacie Lin, Sudeshna Das, Gregory K. Robbins, Sahar F. Zafar, Shibani S. Mukerji, M. Brandon Westover, Classification of neurologic outcomes from medical notes using natural language processing, 2023, 214, 09574174, 119171, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119171
    4. Jin-ah Sim, Xiaolei Huang, Madeline R. Horan, Christopher M. Stewart, Leslie L. Robison, Melissa M. Hudson, Justin N. Baker, I-Chan Huang, Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review, 2023, 146, 09333657, 102701, 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102701
    5. Yu Zhang, Rui Xie, Iman Beheshti, Xia Liu, Guowei Zheng, Yin Wang, Zhenwen Zhang, Weihao Zheng, Zhijun Yao, Bin Hu, Improving brain age prediction with anatomical feature attention-enhanced 3D-CNN, 2024, 169, 00104825, 107873, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107873
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7786) PDF downloads(408) Cited by(7)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog