Using a quasi-natural experiment of the staggered construction of energy conservation and emission reduction (ECER) demonstration cities in China, this paper explores the impact of fiscal policy on green credit (GC) for listed enterprises. The main findings are the following: (1) The ECER demonstration cities policy significantly improves enterprise GC. This conclusion remains robust after considering the heterogeneous treatment effects. (2) By extending the estimation period beyond the policy withdrawal, we use the difference-in-differences designs with multiple groups and periods (DIDM) estimator to compute the average treatment effect of policy switches. The results show that the intervention effect still exists after the policy withdrawal. (3) Direct cash subsidies, corporate green spending, and external financing constraints are the main mechanisms through which the ECER demonstration cities policy works. (4) The effects of the ECER demonstration cities policy are heterogeneous at the batch, urban, industry, and corporate levels. This paper explores the role of fiscal policy on enterprise green financing. The findings provide theoretical and empirical insights for leveraging fiscal tools to enhance environmental governance.
Citation: Yangyang Cheng, Zhenhuan Xu. Fiscal policy promotes corporate green credit: Experience from the construction of energy conservation and emission reduction demonstration cities in China[J]. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024001
Using a quasi-natural experiment of the staggered construction of energy conservation and emission reduction (ECER) demonstration cities in China, this paper explores the impact of fiscal policy on green credit (GC) for listed enterprises. The main findings are the following: (1) The ECER demonstration cities policy significantly improves enterprise GC. This conclusion remains robust after considering the heterogeneous treatment effects. (2) By extending the estimation period beyond the policy withdrawal, we use the difference-in-differences designs with multiple groups and periods (DIDM) estimator to compute the average treatment effect of policy switches. The results show that the intervention effect still exists after the policy withdrawal. (3) Direct cash subsidies, corporate green spending, and external financing constraints are the main mechanisms through which the ECER demonstration cities policy works. (4) The effects of the ECER demonstration cities policy are heterogeneous at the batch, urban, industry, and corporate levels. This paper explores the role of fiscal policy on enterprise green financing. The findings provide theoretical and empirical insights for leveraging fiscal tools to enhance environmental governance.
[1] | Agyeman SD, Lin BQ (2023) The influence of natural gas (De)regulation on innovation for climate change mitigation: Evidence from OECD countries. Environ Impact Asses Rev 98: 106961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106961 doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106961 |
[2] | Aizawa M, Yang CF (2010) Green Credit, Green Stimulus, Green Revolution? China's Mobilization of Banks for Environmental Cleanup. J Environ Dev 19: 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496510371192 doi: 10.1177/1070496510371192 |
[3] | Athey S, Imbens GW (2022) Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption. J Econometrics 226: 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012 |
[4] | Bao T, Dai Y, Feng YX, et al. (2023) Trade liberalisation and trade and capital flows: Evidence from China pilot free trade zones. World Econ 46: 1408–1422 https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13387 doi: 10.1111/twec.13387 |
[5] | Barney JB, Harrison JS (2020) Stakeholder Theory at the Crossroads. Bus Soc 59: 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318796792 doi: 10.1177/0007650318796792 |
[6] | Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States. J Financ 65: 1637–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x |
[7] | Bi KX, Huang P, Wang XX (2016) Innovation performance and influencing factors of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of Chinese manufacturing industry. Technol Forecast Soc 111: 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.024 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.024 |
[8] | Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2021) Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.12419 |
[9] | Braghieri L, Levy R, Makarin A (2022) Social Media and Mental Health. Am Econ Rev 112: 3660–3693. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20211218 doi: 10.1257/aer.20211218 |
[10] | Callaway B, Sant'Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods. J Econometrics 225: 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001 |
[11] | Carlson D, Robinson SA, Blair C, et al. (2021) China's climate ambition: Revisiting its First Nationally Determined Contribution and centering a just transition to clean energy. Energ Policy 155: 112350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112350 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112350 |
[12] | Chen ZF, Zhang X, Chen FL (2021) Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technol Forecast Soc 168: 120744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120744 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120744 |
[13] | Cheng YY, Xu ZH (2023) Fiscal centralization and urban industrial pollution emissions reduction: Evidence from the vertical reform of environmental administrations in China. J Environ Manage 347: 119212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119212 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119212 |
[14] | Cheng ZH, Yu XJ, Zhang Y (2023) Is the construction of new energy demonstration cities conducive to improvements in energy efficiency? Energy 263: 125517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125517 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125517 |
[15] | Coase RH (1981) The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core - a Comment. J Law Econ 24: 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/466980 doi: 10.1086/466980 |
[16] | Cui L, Wu KJ, Tseng ML (2017) Selecting a remanufacturing quality strategy based on consumer preferences. J Clean Prod 161: 1308–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.056 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.056 |
[17] | De Chaisemartin C, D'Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Am Econ Rev 110: 2964–2996. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181169 doi: 10.1257/aer.20181169 |
[18] | Decramer S, Vanormelingen S (2016) The effectiveness of investment subsidies: evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Small Bus Econ 47: 1007–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9749-2 doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9749-2 |
[19] | Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, et al. (1989) Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable - a Nonparametric Approach. Rev Econ Stat 71: 90–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055 doi: 10.2307/1928055 |
[20] | Fazzari SM, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1988) Financing Constraints and Corporate-Investment. Brookings Pap Eco Ac 1988: 141–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534426 doi: 10.2307/2534426 |
[21] | Fee CE, Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR (2009) Investment, Financing Constraints, and Internal Capital Markets: Evidence from the Advertising Expenditures of Multinational Firms. Rev Financ Stud 22: 2361–2392. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn059 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn059 |
[22] | Forcadell FJ, Aracil E, Ubeda F (2020) Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges. Bus Strateg Environ 29: 2181–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2494 doi: 10.1002/bse.2494 |
[23] | Freudenreich B, Luedeke-Freund F, Schaltegger S (2020) A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 166: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z |
[24] | Friedman AL, Miles S (2002) Developing stakeholder theory. J Manage Stud 39: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280 doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00280 |
[25] | Ge T, Hao XL, Li JY (2021) Effects of public participation on environmental governance in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 321: 129042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129042 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129042 |
[26] | Gollop FM, Roberts MJ (1983) Environmental-Regulations and Productivity Growth - the Case of Fossil-Fueled Electric-Power Generation. J Polit Econ 91: 654–674. https://doi.org/10.1086/261170 doi: 10.1086/261170 |
[27] | González X, Pazó C (2008) Do public subsidies stimulate private R & D spending? Res Policy 37: 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009 |
[28] | Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J Econometrics 225: 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014 |
[29] | Heckman JJ, Robb R (1985) Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions - an Overview. J Econometrics 30: 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90139-3 doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90139-3 |
[30] | Hong M, Drakeford B, Zhang KX (2020) The impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on green innovation: evidence from China. Green Financ 2: 302–322. https://doi.org/10.3934/Gf.2020017 doi: 10.3934/Gf.2020017 |
[31] | Hu GQ, Wang XQ, Wang Y (2021) Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energ Econ 98: 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134 |
[32] | Huang ZH, Liao GK, Li ZH (2019) Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc 144: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023 |
[33] | Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1990) Environmental-Regulation and United-States Economic-Growth. Rand J Econ 21: 314–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555426 doi: 10.2307/2555426 |
[34] | Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Q J Econ 112: 169–215. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163 doi: 10.1162/003355397555163 |
[35] | Kouvelis P, Wu XL, Xiao YX (2019) Cash Hedging in a Supply Chain. Manage Sci 65: 3928–3947. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2997 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2997 |
[36] | Lee CC, Nie CF (2023) Place-based policy and green innovation: Evidence from the national pilot zone for ecological conservation in China. Sustain Cities Soc 97: 104730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104730 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104730 |
[37] | Lee CC, Wang FH, Lou RC, et al. (2023) How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China. Renew Energ 204: 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.058 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.058 |
[38] | Liu J, Xia SM, Wang ZX, et al. (2023) How to balance economic profits and environmental protection: The impacts of cash hedging on remanufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 258: 108783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108783 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108783 |
[39] | Liu MC, Rao DD, Yang L, et al. (2021) Subsidy, training or material supply? The impact path of eco-compensation method on farmers' livelihood assets. J Environ Manage 287: 112339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112339 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112339 |
[40] | Liu XH, Wang EX, Cai DT (2019) Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 29: 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014 |
[41] | Liu YY, Liu GC, Zhang CS (2021) Local land supply and fiscal incentives for R & D: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. China Econ Rev 68: 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101630 doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101630 |
[42] | Ma YC, Sha YZ, Wang ZL, et al. (2023) The effect of the policy mix of green credit and government subsidy on environmental innovation. Energ Econ 118: 106512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106512 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106512 |
[43] | Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984) Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. J Financ Econ 13: 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 doi: 10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 |
[44] | Nandy M, Lodh S (2012) Do banks value the eco-friendliness of firms in their corporate lending decision? Some empirical evidence. Int Rev Financ Anal 25: 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.008 |
[45] | Niesten E, Jolink A, Chappin M (2018) Investments in the Dutch onshore wind energy industry: A review of investor profiles and the impact of renewable energy subsidies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81: 2519–2525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.056 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.056 |
[46] | Oliner SD, Rudebusch GD (1992) Sources of the Financing Hierarchy for Business Investment. Rev Econ Stat 74: 643–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109378 doi: 10.2307/2109378 |
[47] | Pawlina G, Renneboog L (2005) Is investment-cash flow sensitivity caused by agency costs or asymmetric information? Evidence from the UK. Eur Financ Manag 11: 483–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00294.x doi: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00294.x |
[48] | Qin M, Zhang XJ, Li YM, et al. (2023) Blockchain market and green finance: The enablers of carbon neutrality in China. Energ Econ 118: 106501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106501 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106501 |
[49] | Shi XW, Ma JT, Jiang AX, et al. (2023) Green bonds: Green investments or greenwashing? Int Rev Financ Anal 90: 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102850 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102850 |
[50] | Sim J (2018) The economic and environmental values of the R & D investment in a renewable energy sector in South Korea. J Clean Prod 189: 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.074 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.074 |
[51] | Sloczynski T, Wooldridge JM (2018) A General Double Robustness Result for Estimating Average Treatment Effects. Economet Theor 34: 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466617000056 doi: 10.1017/S0266466617000056 |
[52] | Songailiene E, Winklhofer H, McKechnie S (2011) A conceptualisation of supplier-perceived value. Eur J Marketing 45: 383–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111107249 doi: 10.1108/03090561111107249 |
[53] | Su CW, Liu FY, Stefea P, et al. (2023) Does technology innovation help to achieve carbon neutrality? Econ Anal Policy 78: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.01.010 |
[54] | Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2009) Can environmental investment and expenditure enhance financial performance of US electric utility firms under the clean air act amendment of 1990? Energ Policy 37: 4819–4826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.038 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.038 |
[55] | Sun LY, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J Econometrics 225: 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006 |
[56] | Tan XJ, Dong HM, Liu YS, et al. (2022) Green bonds and corporate performance: A potential way to achieve green recovery. Renew Energ 200: 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.109 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.109 |
[57] | Tatomir M, Dreyer JK, Sund KJ, et al. (2023) Warm-Glow Investing and the Greenwashing Hypothesis. J Clean Prod 419: 138229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138229 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138229 |
[58] | Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res Policy 36: 1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004 |
[59] | Wang Q, Yi HT (2021) New energy demonstration program and China's urban green economic growth: Do regional characteristics make a difference? Energ Policy 151: 112161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112161 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112161 |
[60] | Wang ZL, Qiu SL (2021) Can "energy saving and emission reduction" demonstration city selection actually contribute to pollution abatement in China? Sustain Prod Consump 27: 1882–1902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.030 |
[61] | Wen HW, Lee CC, Zhou FX (2021) Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises. Energ Econ 94: 105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105099 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105099 |
[62] | Wu AH (2017) The signal effect of Government R & D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter? Technol Forecast Soc 117: 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.033 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.033 |
[63] | Wu WF, Wu CF, Zhou CY, et al. (2012) Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. J Account Public Pol 31: 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.005 |
[64] | Xie XM, Huo JG, Zou HL (2019) Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J Bus Res 101: 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010 |
[65] | Xu QP, Kim T (2022) Financial Constraints and Corporate Environmental Policies. Rev Financ Stud 35: 576–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab056 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhab056 |
[66] | Xu S (2020) International comparison of green credit and its enlightenment to China. Green Financ 2: 75–99. https://doi.org/10.3934/Gf.2020005 doi: 10.3934/Gf.2020005 |
[67] | Xu XK, Li JS (2020) Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. J Clean Prod 264: 121574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574 |
[68] | Xu XY, Hou P, Liu Y (2022) The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the technology innovation of urban green energy: a study based on the panel threshold model. Green Financ 4: 115–136. https://doi.org/10.3934/Gf.2022006 doi: 10.3934/Gf.2022006 |
[69] | Yi YY, Li JX (2018) The effect of governmental policies of carbon taxes and energy-saving subsidies on enterprise decisions in a two-echelon Supply chain. J Clean Prod 181: 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.188 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.188 |
[70] | Yu BJ, Li CM, Mirza N, et al. (2022) Forecasting credit ratings of decarbonized firms: Comparative assessment of machine learning models. Technol Forecast Soc 174: 121255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121255 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121255 |
[71] | Yu FF, Guo Y, Le-Nguyen K, et al. (2016) The impact of government subsidies and enterprises' R & D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energ Policy 89: 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009 |
[72] | Zhang B, Yang Y, Bi J (2011) Tracking the implementation of green credit policy in China: Top-down perspective and bottom-up reform. J Environ Manage 92: 1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.019 |
[73] | Zhang LL, Long RY, Huang Z, et al. (2020) Evolutionary game analysis on the implementation of subsidy policy for sustainable transportation development. J Clean Prod 267: 122159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122159 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122159 |
[74] | Zhang X, Yang YL, Li Y (2023) Does Public Participation Reduce Regional Carbon Emission? Atmosphere-Basel 14: 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010165 doi: 10.3390/atmos14010165 |
[75] | Zhang ZH, Wang J, Feng C, et al. (2023) Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China. Energ Econ 124: 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106763 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106763 |
[76] | Zhao X, Ma XW, Chen BY, et al. (2022) Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures. Resour Conserv Recy 176: 105959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105959 |