Research article Topical Sections

Influence of process parameters on the workability characteristics of sintered Al and Al–Cu composites during cold deformation

  • Received: 31 March 2019 Accepted: 29 May 2019 Published: 31 May 2019
  • An experimental investigation on the process parameters affecting the workability characteristics of sintered aluminium (Al) and aluminium–copper (Al–Cu) composites during cold forging has been carried out. Cylindrical billets of Al, Al–3%Cu and Al–6%Cu with height to diameter ratio (aspect ratio) of 0.45 and 0.9 were cold deformed under three different frictional conditions (nil/no lubricant, graphite lubricant and zinc stearate lubricant). As such, some important process parameters influencing the workability of these composites such as the initial preform geometry and different volume percent of Cu addition to the Al composite preforms on the relative density, R and physical parameters such as stresses affecting the workability stress index, β have been investigated. Also, the effects of the different frictional conditions on the same are presented. It was established that the nil/no lubricant condition and preforms of the lower aspect ratio yielded improved densification, higher values of stresses and better workability. Furthermore, Al–Cu composites were developed to yield better combined properties such as improved densification and workability than monolithic Al. However, the addition of Cu reduced the axial strain to fracture. As such, a decrease in the densification and the workability characteristics was noted with an increase in the volume percent of Cu.

    Citation: Mohammed Nizam Khan, Sumesh Narayan, Ananthanarayanan Rajeshkannan. Influence of process parameters on the workability characteristics of sintered Al and Al–Cu composites during cold deformation[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(3): 441-453. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.441

    Related Papers:

  • An experimental investigation on the process parameters affecting the workability characteristics of sintered aluminium (Al) and aluminium–copper (Al–Cu) composites during cold forging has been carried out. Cylindrical billets of Al, Al–3%Cu and Al–6%Cu with height to diameter ratio (aspect ratio) of 0.45 and 0.9 were cold deformed under three different frictional conditions (nil/no lubricant, graphite lubricant and zinc stearate lubricant). As such, some important process parameters influencing the workability of these composites such as the initial preform geometry and different volume percent of Cu addition to the Al composite preforms on the relative density, R and physical parameters such as stresses affecting the workability stress index, β have been investigated. Also, the effects of the different frictional conditions on the same are presented. It was established that the nil/no lubricant condition and preforms of the lower aspect ratio yielded improved densification, higher values of stresses and better workability. Furthermore, Al–Cu composites were developed to yield better combined properties such as improved densification and workability than monolithic Al. However, the addition of Cu reduced the axial strain to fracture. As such, a decrease in the densification and the workability characteristics was noted with an increase in the volume percent of Cu.


    加载中


    [1] Manonukul A, Salee A (2013) Relationship between atmospheric dew point and sinterability of Al–Si based alloy. J Mater Sci Technol 29: 70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2012.11.010
    [2] Ghasali E, Pakseresht AH, Agheli M, et al. (2015) WC-Co particles reinforced aluminum matrix by conventional and microwave sintering. Mater Res 18: 1197–1202. doi: 10.1590/1516-1439.027115
    [3] Meignanamoorthy M, Ravichandran M (2018) Synthesis of metal matrix composites via powder metallurgy route. Mech Mech Eng 22: 59–69.
    [4] Umasankar V, Xavior MA, Karthikeyan S (2014) Experimental evaluation of the influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of SiC particle reinforced AA6061 aluminium alloy matrix composite by powder processing. J Alloy Compd 582: 380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.129
    [5] Narayan S, Rajeshkannan A (2011) Workability studies in forming of sintered Fe-0.35C powder metallurgy preform during cold upsetting. J Iron Steel Res Int 18: 71–78.
    [6] Kumar A, Gupta M (2016) An insight into evolution of light weight high entropy alloys: a review. Metals 6: 199. doi: 10.3390/met6090199
    [7] Güner F, Cora ÖN, Sofuoğlu H (2018) Effects of friction models on the compaction behavior of copper powder. Tribol Int 122: 125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.022
    [8] Abdel-Rahman M, El-Sheikh MN (1995) Workability in forging of powder metallurgy compacts. J Mater Process Tech 54: 97–102. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01926-X
    [9] Ramesh T, Prabhakar M, Narayanasamy R (2010) Workability studies on Al-20% SiC powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Adv Prod Eng Manag 5: 33–44.
    [10] Ravichandran M, Naveen SA, Anandakrishnan V (2015) Synthesis and forming characteristics of Al–TiO2 powder metallurgy composites during cold upsetting under plane stress state conditions. J Sandw Struct Mater 17: 278–294. doi: 10.1177/1099636214565762
    [11] Wolla DW, Davidson MJ, Khanra AK (2014) Studies on the formability of powder metallurgical aluminum–copper composite. Mater Design 59: 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.049
    [12] Seetharam R, Subbu SK, Davidson MJ (2017) Hot workability and densification behavior of sintered powder metallurgy Al-B4C preforms during upsetting. J Manuf Process 28: 309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.06.012
    [13] Narayan S, Rajeshkannan A (2016) Workability studies of sintered aluminium composites during hot deformation. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 230: 494–504.
    [14] Narayan S, Rajeshkannan A (2017) Studies on formability of sintered aluminum composites during hot deformation using strain hardening parameters. J Mater Res Technol 6: 101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2016.03.012
    [15] Narayan S, Rajeshkannan A (2018) Densification behavior of sintered aluminum composites during hot deformation. AIMS Mater Sci 5: 902–915. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.5.902
    [16] Rajeshkannan A, Narayan S (2018) Forming limit analysis of molybdenum reinforced carbon steels. Key Eng Mater 777: 306–310. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.777.306
    [17] Narayanasamy R, Anandakrishnan V, Pandey KS (2008) Effect of geometric work-hardening and matrix work-hardening on workability and densification of aluminium–3.5% alumina composite during cold upsetting. Mater Design 29: 1582–1599.
    [18] Sivasankaran S, Sivaprasad K, Narayanasamy R, et al. (2010) An investigation on flowability and compressibility of AA 6061100−xx wt.% TiO2 micro and nanocomposite powder prepared by blending and mechanical alloying. Powder Technol 201: 70–82.
    [19] Kumar DR, Loganathan C, Narayanasamy R (2011) Effect of glass in aluminum matrix on workability and strain hardening behavior of powder metallurgy composite. Mater Design 32: 2413–2422. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.008
    [20] Raj APM, Selvakumar N, Narayanasamy R, et al. (2013) Experimental investigation on workability and strain hardening behavior of Fe–C–Mn sintered composites with different percentage of carbon and manganese content. Mater Design 49: 791–801. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.002
    [21] Höppel HW, Mughrabi H, Vinogradov A (2009) Fatigue properties of bulk nanostructured materials, In: Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT, Bulk Nanostructured Materials, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 481–500.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4108) PDF downloads(1101) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(10)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog