Research article Recurring Topics

Spotting from The Rightmost Deep: A Temporal Field Advantage in A Behavioural Task of Attention And Filtering

  • Received: 18 February 2016 Accepted: 29 March 2016 Published: 31 March 2016
  • During the past decades, animal and human physiological studies have suggested that subcortical structures that are part of the extrageniculate pathways have an important role to play in the attentive selection of targets and the filtering of distractors. However, not much has been done to investigate the filtering of distractors in purely behavioural experiments through cues that might reveal extrageniculate functions, such as the asymmetry in performance between the nasal and the temporal visual fields. Here, under monocular conditions, participants viewed laterally and tachistoscopically presented sets of visual stimuli and were required to decide whether a target was present in the set or not. The manipulation of attention demands was achieved by varying the degree of spatial organization of the stimuli. A temporal field advantage in detection accuracy was found, and was observed only for disorganised sets of stimuli, that is, when demands on attention were greater. Furthermore, this pattern was found only for stimuli projected to the right hemisphere. The results suggest that the extrageniculate pathways of the right hemisphere in humans are involved in filtering out distractors. They are discussed in light of findings and theories about extrageniculate mediation of selective attention.

    Citation: George A. Michael, Raphaël Mizzi, Cyril Couffe, Germán Gálvez-García, Élodie Labeye. Spotting from The Rightmost Deep: A Temporal Field Advantage in A Behavioural Task of Attention And Filtering[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(1): 56-66. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.1.56

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hong Li, Keyu Zhang, Hongyan Xu . Solutions for systems of complex Fermat type partial differential-difference equations with two complex variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11796-11814. doi: 10.3934/math.2021685
    [2] Wenju Tang, Keyu Zhang, Hongyan Xu . Results on the solutions of several second order mixed type partial differential difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1907-1924. doi: 10.3934/math.2022110
    [3] Minghui Zhang, Jianbin Xiao, Mingliang Fang . Entire solutions for several Fermat type differential difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11597-11613. doi: 10.3934/math.2022646
    [4] Yeyang Jiang, Zhihua Liao, Di Qiu . The existence of entire solutions of some systems of the Fermat type differential-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17685-17698. doi: 10.3934/math.2022974
    [5] Zhenguang Gao, Lingyun Gao, Manli Liu . Entire solutions of two certain types of quadratic trinomial q-difference differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27659-27669. doi: 10.3934/math.20231415
    [6] Guowei Zhang . The exact transcendental entire solutions of complex equations with three quadratic terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27414-27438. doi: 10.3934/math.20231403
    [7] Yong Liu, Chaofeng Gao, Shuai Jiang . On meromorphic solutions of certain differential-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10343-10354. doi: 10.3934/math.2021599
    [8] Nan Li, Jiachuan Geng, Lianzhong Yang . Some results on transcendental entire solutions to certain nonlinear differential-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8107-8126. doi: 10.3934/math.2021470
    [9] Wenjie Hao, Qingcai Zhang . The growth of entire solutions of certain nonlinear differential-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15904-15916. doi: 10.3934/math.2022870
    [10] Andrey Muravnik . Nonclassical dynamical behavior of solutions of partial differential-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1842-1858. doi: 10.3934/math.2025085
  • During the past decades, animal and human physiological studies have suggested that subcortical structures that are part of the extrageniculate pathways have an important role to play in the attentive selection of targets and the filtering of distractors. However, not much has been done to investigate the filtering of distractors in purely behavioural experiments through cues that might reveal extrageniculate functions, such as the asymmetry in performance between the nasal and the temporal visual fields. Here, under monocular conditions, participants viewed laterally and tachistoscopically presented sets of visual stimuli and were required to decide whether a target was present in the set or not. The manipulation of attention demands was achieved by varying the degree of spatial organization of the stimuli. A temporal field advantage in detection accuracy was found, and was observed only for disorganised sets of stimuli, that is, when demands on attention were greater. Furthermore, this pattern was found only for stimuli projected to the right hemisphere. The results suggest that the extrageniculate pathways of the right hemisphere in humans are involved in filtering out distractors. They are discussed in light of findings and theories about extrageniculate mediation of selective attention.


    We first assume that the readers are familiar with the notations of the Nevanlinna theory such as $ T(r, f), m(r, f), N(r, f) $ and so on, which can be found, for instant, in Hayman [12], Yang [31], Yi and Yang [32]. As is known to all, Nevanlinna theory is a powerful tool in analysing the properties of meromorphic functions including meromorphic functions in arbitrary plane regions, algebroid functions, functions of several variables, holomorphic curves, uniqueness theory of meromorphic function and complex differential equations, and so on. Moreover, it is also used in lots of areas of mathematics including potential theory, measure theory, differential geometry, topology and others.

    Around 2006, Chiang and Feng [6], Halburd and Korhonen [8] established independently the difference analogues of Nevanlinna theory in $ \mathbb{C} $, respectively. In the past two decades, many scholars paid a lot of attention to a large number of interesting topics on complex difference of meromorphic functions by making use of the difference analogue of Nevanlinna theory, and complex difference results are in the rapid development.

    In all the previous articles, Korhonen, Halburd, Chen and his students investigated the properties of solutions for a series of linear difference equations, the difference Painlevé equations, the Riccati equations, the Pielou logistic equations, and obtained the conditions of the existence and estimations of growth order for the above difference equations [1,4,5,9,27,35]; Laine, Korhonen, Yang, Chen, etc. established the difference analogue of Clunie Lemma and Mohonko Lemma, and gave the existence theorems on solutions for some complex difference equations including difference Malmquist type and some nonlinear difference equations [16,17,21]; Korhonen, Zhang, Liu, Yang paid close attention to some complex differential difference equations [11,18,19,20,24,34], in special, Liu and his co-authors [18,19,20] investigated some types of complex differential difference equations of Fermat type such as

    $ f(z)2+f(z+c)2=1,
    $
    (1.1)
    $ f(z)2+[f(z+c)f(z)]2=1.
    $
    (1.2)

    They proved that the transcendental entire solutions with finite order of equation (1.1) must satisfy $ f(z) = \sin(z\pm Bi) $, where $ B $ is a constant and $ c = 2k\pi $ or $ c = (2k+1)\pi $, $ k $ is an integer, and the transcendental entire solutions with finite order of equation (1.2) must satisfy $ f(z) = 1 2 \sin(2z + Bi) $, where $ c = (2k+1)\pi $, $ k $ is an integer, and $ B $ is a constant. In 2016, Gao [7] discussed the solutions for the system of complex differential-difference equations

    $ {[f1(z)]2+f2(z+c)2=1,[f2(z)]2+f1(z+c)2=1,
    $
    (1.3)

    and extend the results given by Liu and Cao.

    Theorem 1.1. (see [7,Theorem 1.1]). Suppose that $ (f_1, f_2) $ is a pair of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for the system of differential-difference equations (1.3). Then $ (f_1, f_2) $ satisfies

    $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) = (\sin(z-bi), \sin(z-b_1i)), $

    or

    $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) = (\sin(z+bi), \sin(z+b_1i)), $

    where $ b, b_1 $ are constants, and $ c = k\pi $, $ k $ is a integer.

    In 2012, Korhonen [14] firstly established the difference version of logarithmic derivative lemma (shortly, we may say logarithmic difference lemma) for meromorphic functions on $ \mathbb{C}^m $ with hyper order strictly less than $ \frac{2}{3} $, and then used it to consider a class of partial difference equations in the same paper. Later, Cao and Korhonen [2] improved the logarithmic difference lemma to the case where the hyper order is strictly less than one. In 2019, Cao and Xu [3] further improved the logarithmic difference lemma in several variables under the condition of minimal type $ \limsup\limits_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\log T(r, f)}{r} = 0 $. As far as we know, however, there are very little of results on solutions of complex partial difference equations by using Nevanlinna theory. By making use of the Nevanlinna theory with several complex variables (see [2,3,14]), Xu and Cao [3,29,30], Lu and Li [22] investigated the existence of the solutions for some Fermat type partial differential-difference equations with several variables, and obtained the following theorem.

    Theorem 1.2. (see [29,Theorem 1.2]). Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2 $. Then any transcendental entire solutions with finite order of the partial differential-difference equation

    $ \left(\frac{\partial f(z_1, z_2)}{\partial z_1}\right)^2+f(z_1+c_1, z_2+c_2)^2 = 1 $

    has the form of $ f(z_1, z_2) = \sin(Az_1+B) $, where $ A $ is a constant on $ \mathbb{C} $ satisfying $ Ae^{iAc_1} = 1 $, and $ B $ is a constant on $ \mathbb{C} $; in the special case whenever $ c_1 = 0 $, we have $ f(z_1, z_2) = \sin(z_1+B) $.

    In 2020, Xu, Liu and Li [28] further explored the existence and forms of several systems of complex partial differential difference equations and extend the previous results given by [29,30].

    Theorem 1.3. (see [28,Theorem 1.3]). Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2 $. Then any pair of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for the system of Fermat type partial differential-difference equations

    $ {(f1(z1,z2)z1)2+f2(z1+c1,z2+c2)2=1,(f2(z1,z2)z1)2+f1(z1+c1,z2+c2)2=1
    $
    (1.4)

    has the following form

    $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) = \left(\frac{e^{L(z)+B_1}+e^{-(L(z)+B_1)}}{2}, \frac{A_{21}e^{L(z)+B_1}+A_{22}e^{-(L(z)+B_1)}}{2}\right), $

    where $ L(z) = a_1z_1+a_2z_2 $, $ B_1 $ is a constant in $ \mathbb{C} $, and $ a_1, c, A_{21}, A_{22} $ satisfy one of the following cases

    $ (i) $ $ A_{21} = -i $, $ A_{22} = i $, and $ a_1 = i $, $ L(c) = (2k+\frac{1}{2})\pi i $, or $ a_1 = -i $, $ L(c) = (2k-\frac{1}{2})\pi i $;

    $ (ii) $ $ A_{21} = i $, $ A_{22} = -i $, and $ a_1 = i $, $ L(c) = (2k-\frac{1}{2})\pi i $, or $ a_1 = -i $, $ L(c) = (2k+\frac{1}{2})\pi i $;

    $ (iii) $ $ A_{21} = 1 $, $ A_{22} = 1 $, and $ a_1 = i $, $ L(c) = 2k\pi i $, or $ a_1 = -i $, $ L(c) = (2k+1)\pi i $;

    $ (iv) $ $ A_{21} = -1 $, $ A_{22} = -1 $, and $ a_1 = i $, $ L(c) = (2k+1)\pi i $, or $ a_1 = -i $, $ L(c) = 2k\pi i $.

    The above results suggest the following questions.

    Question 1.1. What will happen about the solutions when $ f(z) $, $ f(z+c) $, $ \frac{\partial f}{\partial z_1} $ and $ \frac{\partial f}{\partial z_2} $ are included in the equations in Theorem B?

    Question 1.2. What will happen about the solutions when the equations are turned into system under the hypothesis of Question 1.1?

    In view of the above questions, this article is concerned with the description of the existence and the forms of entire solutions for several partial differential difference of Fermat type. The main tools are used in this paper are the Nevanlinna theory and difference Nevanlinna theory with several complex variables. Our main results are obtained generalized the previous theorems given by Xu and Cao, Liu, Cao and Cao [20,29]. Throughout this paper, for convenience, we assume that $ z+w = (z_1+w_1, z_2+w_2) $ for any $ z = (z_1, z_2), w = (w_1, w_2) $. The main results of this paper are stated below.

    Theorem 2.1. Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2-\{(0, 0)\} $. Then any transcendental entire solution $ f(z_1, z_2) $ with finite order of the partial differential equation

    $ f(z)2+[f(z+c)+fz1]2=1
    $
    (2.1)

    must be of the form

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)+b}+e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}, $

    where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, and $ L(c): = \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 $, $ \alpha_1 $, $ \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $ satisfy

    (i) $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = -2i $;

    (ii) $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = 0 $.

    The following examples show that the forms of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for equation (2.1) are precise.

    Example 2.1. Let $ \alpha_1 = -2i $, $ \alpha_2 = \frac{3\pi}{2} $ and $ b\in \mathbb{C} $, that is,

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{2z_2+b}+e^{-2z_2-b}}{2}. $

    Then $ f(z_1, z_2) $ satisfies equation (2.1) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (c_1, \frac{3\pi i}{4}) $, where $ c_1\in \mathbb{C} $.

    Example 2.2. Let $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, $ \alpha_2 = 2 $ and $ b = 0 $, that is,

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{-2iz_1+\frac{3\pi}{2}}+e^{2iz_1-\frac{3\pi}{2}}}{2}. $

    Then $ f(z_1, z_2) $ satisfies equation (2.1) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (\frac{\pi}{2}, i) $.

    If equation (2.1) contains both two partial differentials and difference, we obtain

    Theorem 2.2. Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2-\{(0, 0)\} $ and $ s = c_2z_1-c_1z_2 $. Then any transcendental entire solution $ f(z_1, z_2) $ with finite order of the partial differential equation

    $ f(z)2+[f(z+c)+fz1+fz2]2=1
    $
    (2.2)

    must be of the form

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)+H(s)+b}+e^{-L(z)-H(s)-b}}{2}, $

    where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, $ H(s) $ is a polynomial in $ s $, and $ L(c) $, $ \alpha_1 $, $ \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $ satisfy

    (i) $ c_1 = c_2 = k\pi+\frac{3}{4}\pi $, $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $ and $ \deg_sH\geq 2 $;

    (ii) $ c_1\neq c_2 $, $ H(s)\equiv0 $, and $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $ or $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $.

    We list the following examples to show that the forms of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for equation (2.2) are precise.

    Example 2.3. Let $ L(z) = -3iz_1+iz_2 $, $ H(s) = \frac{3\pi i}{4}(z_1-z_2)^n $, $ n\in \mathbb{N}_+ $ and $ b = 0 $, that is,

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)+H(s)}+e^{-L(z)-H(s)}}{2} = \cos[-3z_1+z_2+\frac{3\pi}{4}(z_1-z_2)^n]. $

    Then $ f(z_1, z_2) $ satisfies equation (2.2) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (\frac{3\pi}{4}, \frac{3\pi}{4}) $.

    Example 2.4. Let $ L(z) = -3iz_1+iz_2 $, $ H(s)\equiv0 $, and $ b = 0 $, that is,

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)}+e^{-L(z)}}{2} = \cos(-3z_1+z_2). $

    Then $ f(z_1, z_2) $ satisfies equation (2.2) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (-\frac{\pi}{2}, \pi) $.

    Example 2.5. Let $ L(z) = iz_1-iz_2 $, and $ b = 0 $, that is, $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $ and

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)}+e^{-L(z)}}{2} = \cos(z_1-z_2). $

    Then $ f(z_1, z_2) $ satisfies equation (2.2) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (2\pi, \frac{\pi}{2}) $.

    When equation (2.1) is turned to system of functional equations, we have

    Theorem 2.3. Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2-\{(0, 0)\} $. Then any pair of finite order transcendental entire solution $ (f_1, f_2) $ for the system of the partial differential equations

    $ {f1(z)2+[f2(z+c)+f1z1]2=1,f2(z)2+[f1(z+c)+f2z1]2=1
    $
    (2.3)

    must be of the form

    $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) = \left(\frac{e^{L(z)+b}+e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}, \frac{A_1e^{L(z)+b}+A_2e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}\right), $

    where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, and $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b, A_1, A_2\in \mathbb{C} $ satisfy one of the following cases:

    (i) if $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, then $ \alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = -1 $ or $ \alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = 1 $ or $ \alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i $, $ A_1 = -i, A_2 = i $ or $ \alpha_2c_2 = (2k+1)\pi i $, $ A_1 = i, A_2 = -i $, $ k\in \mathbb{Z} $;

    (ii) if $ \alpha_1 = -2i $, then $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = 1 $ or $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = -1 $, $ k\in\mathbb{ Z} $.

    Some examples show the existence of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for system (2.3).

    Example 2.6. Let $ L(z) = iz_2 $ and $ b = 0 $, that is, $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, $ \alpha_2 = i $ and

    $ (f_1, f_2) = \left(\frac{e^{iz_2}+e^{-iz_2}}{2}, -\frac{e^{iz_2}+e^{-iz_2}}{2}\right) = (\cos z_2, -\cos z_2). $

    Then $ (f_1, f_2) $ satisfies system (2.3) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (c_1, \frac{\pi}{2}) $, where $ c_1\in \mathbb{C} $.

    Example 2.7. Let $ L(z) = iz_2 $ and $ b = 0 $, that is, $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, $ \alpha_2 = i $ and

    $ (f_1, f_2) = \left(\frac{e^{iz_2}+e^{-iz_2}}{2}, \frac{-ie^{iz_2}+ie^{-iz_2}}{2}\right) = (\cos z_2, \sin z_2). $

    Then $ (f_1, f_2) $ satisfies system (2.3) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (c_1, 2\pi) $, where $ c_1\in \mathbb{C} $.

    Example 2.8. Let $ L(z) = -2iz_1+iz_2 $ and $ b = 0 $, that is, $ \alpha_1 = -2i $, $ \alpha_2 = i $ and

    $ (f1,f2)=(eL(z)+eL(z)2,eL(z)+eL(z)2)=(cos(2z1+z2),cos(2z1+z2)).
    $

    Then $ (f_1, f_2) $ satisfies system (2.3) with $ (c_1, c_2) = (-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}) $.

    Similar to the argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.3, we can get the following result easily.

    Theorem 2.4. Let $ c = (c_1, c_2)\in \mathbb{C}^2 $ and $ c_1\neq c_2 $. Then any pair of transcendental entire solution $ (f_1, f_2) $ with finite order for the system of the partial differential equations

    $ {f1(z)2+[f2(z+c)+f1z1+f1z2]2=1,f2(z)2+[f1(z+c)+f2z1+f2z2]2=1
    $
    (2.4)

    must be of the form

    $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) = \left(\frac{e^{L(z)+b}+e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}, \frac{A_1e^{L(z)+b}+A_2e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}\right), $

    where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, and $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b, A_1, A_2\in \mathbb{C} $ satisfy one of the following cases:

    (i) if $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $, then $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = -1 $ or $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = 1 $ or $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i $, $ A_1 = -i, A_2 = i $ or $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = (2k+1)\pi i $, $ A_1 = i, A_2 = -i $, $ k\in \mathbb{Z} $;

    (ii) if $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $, then $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = 1 $ or $ \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, $ A_1 = A_2 = -1 $, $ k\in\mathbb{ Z} $.

    The following example shows that the condition $ c_1\neq c_2 $ in Theorem 2.4 can not be removed.

    Example 2.9. Let $ c_1\neq 0 $ and

    $ (f_1, f_2) = \left(\frac{e^{g(z_1, z_2)}+e^{-g(z_1, z_2)}}{2}, \frac{-ie^{g(z_1, z_2)}+ie^{-g(z_1, z_2)}}{2}\right), $

    where $ g(z_1, z_2) = z_1-z_2+\beta(z_1-z_2)^n $, $ \beta\neq0 $ and $ n\in \mathbb{N}_+ $. Then $ (f_1, f_2) $ is a pair of transcendental entire solutions with finite order for system (2.4) with $ c = (c_1, c_1) $.

    The following lemmas play the key roles in proving our results.

    Lemma 3.1. ([25,26]). For an entire function $ F $ on $ \mathbb{C}^n $, $ F(0)\neq0 $ and put $ \rho(n_F) = \rho < \infty $. Then there exist a canonical function $ f_F $ and a function $ g_F\in \mathbb{C}^n $ such that $ F(z) = f_F (z)e^{g_F (z)} $. For the special case $ n = 1 $, $ f_F $ is the canonical product of Weierstrass.

    Remark 3.1. Here, denote $ \rho(n_F) $ to be the order of the counting function of zeros of $ F $.

    Lemma 3.2. ([23]). If $ g $ and $ h $ are entire functions on the complex plane $ \mathbb{C} $ and $ g(h) $ is an entire function of finite order, then there are only two possible cases: either

    (a) the internal function $ h $ is a polynomial and the external function $ g $ is of finite order; or else

    (b) the internal function $ h $ is not a polynomial but a function of finite order, and the external function $ g $ is of zero order.

    Lemma 3.3. ([13,Lemma 3.1]). Let $ f_j(\not\equiv0), j = 1, 2, 3 $, be meromorphic functions on $ \mathbb{C}^m $ such that $ f_1 $ is not constant, and $ f_1+f_2+f_3 = 1 $, and such that

    $ \sum\limits_{j = 1}^3\left\{N_2(r, \frac{1}{f_j})+2\overline{N}(r, f_j)\right\} \lt \lambda T(r, f_1)+O(\log^+T(r, f_1)), $

    for all $ r $ outside possibly a set with finite logarithmic measure, where $ \lambda < 1 $ is a positive number. Then either $ f_2 = 1 $ or $ f_3 = 1 $, where $ N_2(r, \frac{1}{f}) $ is the counting function of the zeros of $ f $ in $ |z|\leq r $, where the simple zero is counted once, and the multiple zero is counted twice.

    Suppose that $ f(z) $ is a transcendental entire solution with finite order of equation (2.1). Thus, we rewrite (2.1) as the following form

    $ [f(z)+i(f(z+c)+fz1)][f(z)i(f(z+c)+fz1)]=1,
    $
    (3.1)

    which implies that both $ f(z)+i\left(f(z+c)+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z_1}\right) $ and $ f(z)-i\left(f(z+c)+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z_1}\right) $ have no poles and zeros. Thus, by Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, there thus exists a polynomial $ p(z) $ such that

    $ f(z)+i(f(z+c)+fz1)=ep(z),f(z)i(f(z+c)+fz1)=ep(z).
    $

    This leads to

    $ f(z)=ep(z)+ep(z)2,
    $
    (3.2)
    $ f(z+c)+f(z)z1=ep(z)ep(z)2i.
    $
    (3.3)

    Substituting (3.2) into (3.3), it yields that

    $ (pz1+i)ep(z+c)+p(z)+(pz1+i)ep(z+c)p(z)e2p(z+c)=1.
    $
    (3.4)

    Obviously, $ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1}+i\not\equiv0 $. Otherwise, $ e^{2p(z+c)}\equiv-1 $, thus $ p(z) $ is a constant. Then $ f(z) $ is a constant, this a contradiction. By Lemma 3.3, it follows from (3.4) that

    $ (pz1+i)ep(z+c)p(z)=1.
    $
    (3.5)

    Thus, in view of (3.4) and (3.5), we conclude that

    $ (pz1+i)ep(z)p(z+c)=1.
    $
    (3.6)

    Equations (3.5) and (3.6) mean that $ e^{2[p(z+c)-p(z)]} = -1 $. Thus, it yields that $ p(z) = L(z)+H(s)+b $, where $ L $ is a linear function as the form $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, $ e^{2L(c)} = -1 $, and $ H(s) $ is a polynomial in $ s: = c_2z_1-c_1z_2 $, $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $.

    On the other hand, it follows from (3.5) and (3.6) that $ \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1}+i\right)^2 = -1 $, that is, $ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1} = 0 $ or $ \frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1} = -2i $. In view of (3.5) or (3.6), it yields that $ e^{L(c)} = i $ and $ \alpha_1 = -2i $ or $ e^{L(c)} = -i $ and $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, that is, $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = -2i $ or $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = 0 $. Moreover, by combining with $ p(z) = L(z)+H(s)+b $, we have that $ H'c_2 = \eta $, where $ \eta $ is a constant. If $ c_2 = 0 $, then $ H(s) = H(-c_1z_2) $, and combining with $ e^{2(p(z+c)-p(z))} = -1 $, then it follows that $ \deg_sH\leq 1 $. If $ c_2\neq 0 $, it is easy to get that $ H(s) $ is a polynomial in $ s $ with $ \deg_s H\leq1 $. Hence, we can conclude that $ L(z) + H(s) + b $ is a linear form in $ z_1, z_2 $, w.l.o.g, we denote that the form is $ \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2+b $, where $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $. Thus, by combining with (3.5) and (3.6), we have

    $ f(z_1, z_2) = \frac{e^{L(z)+b}+e^{-L(z)-b}}{2}, $

    where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, and $ L(c) $, $ \alpha_1 $, $ \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $ satisfy $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = -2i $ or $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1 = 0 $, $ k\in \mathbb{Z} $.

    Therefore, this completes the proof of Theorem 2.1.

    Suppose that $ f(z) $ is a transcendental entire solution with finite order of equation (2.2). Similar to the argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, there exists a nonconstant polynomial $ p(z) $ such that (3.2) and

    $ (pz1+pz2+i)ep(z+c)p(z)=1,
    $
    (3.7)
    $ (pz1+pz2+i)ep(z)p(z+c)=1.
    $
    (3.8)

    In view of (3.7) and (3.8), we have $ e^{2(p(z+c)-p(z))} = -1 $. Thus, it yields that $ p(z) = L(z)+H(s)+b $, where $ L $ is a linear function as the form $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, $ H(s) $ is a polynomial in $ s $, and $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $, and $ e^{2L(c)} = -1 $.

    On the other hand, from (3.7) and (3.8), we have $ \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1}+\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_2}+i\right)^2 = -1 $. Noting that $ p(z) = L(z)+H(s)+b $, it follow that

    $ [α1+α2+H(c2c1)+i]2=1.
    $
    (3.9)

    If $ c_1 = c_2 $, then $ H'(c_2-c_1)\equiv0 $. This shows that $ H(s) $ can be any degree polynomial in $ s $. In fact, we can assume that $ \deg_s H\geq 2 $. If $ \deg_sH\leq 1 $, then $ L(z)+H(s)+b $ is still a linear function of the form $ a_1z_1+a_2z_2 $, this means that $ H(s)\equiv0 $. In view of (3.9), it yields that $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $ or $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $. If $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $, that is, $ \alpha_1 = -\alpha_2 $, combining with $ c_1 = c_2 $, then it leads to $ L(c) = \alpha_1c_1-\alpha_1c_1 = 0 $, that is, $ e^{2L(c)} = 1 $, this is a contradiction with $ e^{2L(c)} = -1 $. If $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $, then $ L(c) = (\alpha_1+\alpha_2)c_1 = -2ic_1 $. By combining with $ e^{L(c)} = -i $, we have $ c_1 = c_2 = k\pi+\frac{3}{4}\pi $.

    If $ c_1\neq c_2 $, then $ H' $ must be a constant, that is, $ \deg_sH\leq 1 $. Hence, we can conclude that $ L(z) + H(s) + b $ is a linear form in $ z_1, z_2 $. Thus, this means that $ H(s)\equiv0 $ and $ H'(c_2-c_1)\equiv0 $. Hence, we have $ p(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2+b $, where $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, b\in \mathbb{C} $. So, in view of (3.9), we also have $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $ or $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $. Further, In view of (3.7) or (3.8), we conclude that $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = -2i $ or $ L(c) = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $ and $ \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = 0 $, $ k\in \mathbb{Z} $.

    Therefore, this completes the proof of Theorem 2.2.

    Suppose that $ (f_1(z), f_2(z)) $ is a pair of transcendental entire solutions with finite order of (2.3). By using the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, there exist two polynomials $ p(z), q(z) $ in $ \mathbb{C}^2 $ such that

    $ {f1(z)=ep(z)+ep(z)2,f2(z+c)+f1z1=ep(z)ep(z)2i,f2(z)=eq(z)+eq(z)2,f1(z+c)+f2z1=eq(z)eq(z)2i.
    $
    (4.1)

    In view of (4.1), it follows that

    $ (i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)+(i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)e2q(z+c)1,
    $
    (4.2)

    and

    $ (i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)+(i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)e2p(z+c)1.
    $
    (4.3)

    Thus, by applying Lemma 3.3, we can deduce from (4.2) and (4.3) that

    $ (i+\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1})e^{-p(z)+q(z+c)} = 1, \; \; or\; \; -(i+\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1})e^{p(z)+q(z+c)} = 1 $

    and

    $ (i+\frac{\partial q}{\partial z_1})e^{-q(z)+p(z+c)} = 1, \; \; or\; \; -(i+\frac{\partial q}{\partial z_1})e^{q(z)+p(z+c)} = 1. $

    Now, we will discuss four cases below.

    Case 1.

    $ {(i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)=1,(i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)=1.
    $
    (4.4)

    Thus, it follows that $ -p(z)+q(z+c) = \eta_1 $ and $ -q(z)+p(z+c) = \eta_2 $, that is, $ p(z+2c)-p(z) = \eta_2+\eta_1 $ and $ q(z+2c)-q(z) = \eta_2+\eta_1 $, here and below $ \eta_1, \eta_2 $ are constants in $ \mathbb{C} $, which each occurrence can be inconsistent. So, we can deduce that $ p(z) = L(z)+H(s)+B_1 $ and $ q(z) = L(z)+H(s)+B_2 $, where $ L(z) $ is a linear function of the form $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, $ H(s) $ is a polynomial in $ s: = c_1z_2-c_2z_1 $, $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, B_1, B_2 $ are constants in $ \mathbb{C} $. Noting that $ (i+\frac{\partial p}{\partial z_1}) $ and $ (i+\frac{\partial q}{\partial z_1}) $ are constants, it follows that $ p(z) = L(z)+B_1 $ and $ q(z) = L(z)+B_2 $. Thus, by combining with (4.2)-(4.4), it yields that

    $ {(i+α1)eL(c)+B2B1=1,(i+α1)eL(c)+B1B2=1,(i+α1)eL(c)+B1B2=1,(i+α1)eL(c)+B2B1=1,
    $
    (4.5)

    where $ L(c): = \alpha_1c_1+\alpha_2c_2 $, this thus leads to

    $ (i+α1)2=1,e2L(c)=1,e2(B1B2)=1.
    $
    (4.6)

    Then we have $ \alpha_1 = 0 $ or $ \alpha_1 = -2i $.

    Assume that $ \alpha_1 = 0 $. If $ e^{L(c)} = i $, that is, $ L(c) = \alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, then it follows from (4.5) that $ e^{B_2-B_1} = -1 $. Noting that system (4.1), we have

    $ f_1(z) = \frac{e^{p(z)}+e^{-p(z)}}{2} = \frac{e^{L(z)+B_1}+e^{-L(z)-B_1}}{2}, $

    and

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1+B2B1+eL(z)B1+B1B22=eL(z)+B1+eL(z)B12=f1(z).
    $

    If $ e^{L(c)} = -i $, that is, $ L(c) = \alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, then it follows from (4.5) that $ e^{B_2-B_1} = 1 $. Thus, it yields from (4.1) that

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1+B2B1+eL(z)B1+B1B22=eL(z)+B1+eL(z)B12=f1(z).
    $

    Assume that $ \alpha_1 = -2i $. If $ e^{L(c)} = i $, that is, $ L(c) = -2ic_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{\pi}{2}i $, then it follows from (4.5) that $ e^{B_2-B_1} = 1 $. Noting that system (4.1), we have

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1+B2B1+eL(z)B1+B1B22=eL(z)+B1+eL(z)B12=f1(z).
    $

    If $ e^{L(c)} = -i $, that is, $ L(c) = -2ic_1+\alpha_2c_2 = 2k\pi i+\frac{3\pi}{2}i $, then it follows from (4.5) that $ e^{B_2-B_1} = -1 $. Thus, it yields from (4.1) that

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1+B2B1+eL(z)B1+B1B22=eL(z)+B1+eL(z)B12=f1(z).
    $

    Case 2.

    $ {(i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)=1,(i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)=1.
    $

    Thus, it follows that $ -p(z)+q(z+c) = \eta_1 $ and $ q(z)+p(z+c) = \eta_2 $, that is, $ q(z+2c)+q(z) = \eta_1-\eta_2 $. Noting that $ q(z) $ is a nonconstant polynomial in $ \mathbb{C}^2 $, we can get a contradiction.

    Case 3.

    $ {(i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)=1,(i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)=1.
    $

    Thus, it follows that $ p(z)+q(z+c) = \eta_1 $ and $ -q(z)+p(z+c) = \eta_2 $, that is, $ p(z+2c)+p(z) = \eta_2+\eta_1 $. Noting that $ p(z) $ is a nonconstant polynomial in $ \mathbb{C}^2 $, we can get a contradiction.

    Case 4.

    $ {(i+pz1)ep(z)+q(z+c)=1,(i+qz1)eq(z)+p(z+c)=1.
    $
    (4.7)

    Thus, it follows that $ p(z)+q(z+c) = \eta_1 $ and $ q(z)+p(z+c) = \eta_2 $, that is, $ p(z+2c)-p(z) = \eta_2-\eta_1 $ and $ q(z+2c)-q(z) = \eta_1-\eta_2 $. Similar to the same argument as in Case 1, we get that $ p(z) = L(z)+B_1 $ and $ q(z) = -L(z)+B_2 $, where $ L(z) = \alpha_1z_1+\alpha_2z_2 $, $ \alpha_1, \alpha_2, B_1, B_2 $ are constants in $ \mathbb{C} $. Thus, by combining with (4.2)-(4.3) and (4.7), it yields that

    $ {(i+α1)eL(c)B1B2=1,(iα1)eL(c)B1B2=1,(i+α1)eL(c)+B1+B2=1,(iα1)eL(c)+B1+B2=1,
    $
    (4.8)

    which leads to $ (i-\alpha_1)^2 = (i+\alpha_1)^2 = -1 $, that is, $ \alpha_1 = 0 $. Then, it leads to

    $ e2L(c)=1,e2(B1+B2)=1.
    $
    (4.9)

    If $ e^{L(c)} = 1 $, that is, $ L(c) = 2k\pi i $, then it follows from (4.8) that $ e^{B_1+B_2} = i $. Noting that system (4.1), we have

    $ f_1(z) = \frac{e^{p(z)}+e^{-p(z)}}{2} = \frac{e^{L(z)+B_1}+e^{-L(z)-B_1}}{2}, $

    and

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1B1B2+eL(z)B1+B1+B22=ieL(z)+B1+ieL(z)B12.
    $

    If $ e^{L(c)} = -1 $, that is, $ L(c) = (2k+1)\pi i $, then it follows from (4.8) that $ e^{B_1+B_2} = -i $. Noting that system (4.1), we have

    $ f2(z)=eL(z)+B2+eL(z)B22=eL(z)+B1B1B2+eL(z)B1+B1+B22=ieL(z)+B1ieL(z)B12.
    $

    Therefore, this completes the proof of Theorem 2.3.

    By observing the argument as in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, when $ f(z) $ is a function with one complex variable, we can obtain the following conclusions easily.

    Theorem 5.1. Then the following complex differential equation

    $ f(z)2+[f(z)+f(z)]2=1
    $
    (5.1)

    has no any transcendental entire solutions with finite order.

    Theorem 5.2. Let $ c\in \mathbb{C}-\{0\} $. Suppose that the complex differential difference equation

    $ f(z)2+[f(z+c)+f(z)]2=1
    $
    (5.2)

    admits a transcendental entire solution with finite order. Then $ f $ must be of the form

    $ f(z) = \frac{e^{2iz+b}+e^{-2iz-b}}{2}, $

    and $ c = -\frac{\pi}{4}\pm k\pi $, $ k\in \mathbb{Z} $, where $ b\in \mathbb{C} $.

    Theorem 5.3. The following system of complex differential equations

    $ {f1(z)2+[f2(z)+f2(z)]2=1,f2(z)2+[f1(z)+f1(z)]2=1
    $
    (5.3)

    has no any transcendental entire solutions with finite order.

    For further studying the solutions of (2.1)-(2.4), we raise the following question which can not be solved now.

    Question 5.1. How to describe the transcendental meromorphic solutions of (2.1)–(2.4)?

    We thank the referee(s) for reading the manuscript very carefully and making a number of valuable and kind comments which improved the presentation.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11561033), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province in China (20181BAB201001), and the Foundation of Education Department of Jiangxi (GJJ190876, GJJ191042, GJJ190895) of China.

    The authors declare that none of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

    [1] Donnelly N, Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (1991) Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 561-570. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.561
    [2] Krauzlis RJ, Lovejoy LP, Zenon A (2013) Superior Colliculus and Visual Spatial Attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 36. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170249.
    [3] Wurtz RH, McAlonan K, Cavanaugh J, et al. (2011) Thalamic pathways for active vision. Trends Cogn Sci 15: 177-184. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.004.
    [4] Fischer J, Whitney D (2012) Attention gates visual coding in the human pulvinar. Nat Commun 3: 1051. doi:10.1038/ncomms2054.
    [5] Strumpf H, Mangun GR, Boehler CN, et al. (2013) The role of the pulvinar in distractor processing and visual search. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 1115-1132. doi:10.1002/hbm.21496. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21496
    [6] Michael GA, Desmedt S (2004) The human pulvinar and attentional processing of visual distractors. Neurosci Lett 362: 176-181. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.062. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.062
    [7] Snow JC, Allen HA, Rafal RD, et al. (2009) Impaired attentional selection following lesions to human pulvinar: Evidence for homology between human and monkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4054-4059. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810086106.
    [8] Lyon DC, Nassi JJ, Callaway EM (2010) A Disynaptic Relay from Superior Colliculus to Dorsal Stream Visual Cortex in Macaque Monkey. Neuron 65: 270-279. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.003. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.003
    [9] Goldberg ME, Wurtz RH (1972) Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. I. Visual receptive fields of single neurons. J Neurophysiol 35: 542-559.
    [10] Itaya SK, Van Hoesen GW (1983) Retinal projections to the inferior and medial pulvinar nuclei in the old-world monkey. Brain Res 269: 223-230. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(83)90131-2. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90131-2
    [11] Wilson ME, Toyne MJ (1970) Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections inMacaca mulatta. Brain Res 24: 395-406. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(70)90181-2. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90181-2
    [12] Cotton PL, Smith AT (2007) Contralateral Visual Hemifield Representations in the Human Pulvinar Nucleus. J Neurophysiol 98: 1600-1609. doi:10.1152/jn.00419.2007. doi: 10.1152/jn.00419.2007
    [13] Schneider KA, Kastner S (2005) Visual Responses of the Human Superior Colliculus: A High-Resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Neurophysiol 94: 2491-2503. doi:10.1152/jn.00288.2005. doi: 10.1152/jn.00288.2005
    [14] Jóhannesson ÓI, Kristjánsson Á (2013) Violating the main sequence: asymmetries in saccadic peak velocities for saccades into the temporal versus nasal hemifields. Exp Brain Res 227: 101-110. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3490-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3490-8
    [15] Rafal R, Henik A, Smith J (1991) Extrageniculate Contributions to Reflex Visual Orienting in Normal Humans: A Temporal Hemifield Advantage. J Cogn Neurosci 3: 322–328. doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.322. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.322
    [16] Zackon DH, Casson EJ, Zafar A, et al. (1999) The temporal order judgment paradigm: subcorticalattentional contribution under exogenous and endogenouscueing conditions. Neuropsychologia 37: 511-520. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00134-1. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00134-1
    [17] Michael GA, Ojéda N (2005) Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: Evidence from a modified search paradigm. Neurosci Lett 388: 65-70. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.06.027. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.06.027
    [18] Michael GA, Gálvez-García G (2011) Salience-based progression of visual attention. Behav Brain Res 224: 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.024. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.024
    [19] Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (2013) Divided brains: The biology and behavior of brain asymmetries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [20] LaBerge D (1990) Thalamic and Cortical Mechanisms of Attention Suggested by Recent Positron Emission Tomographic Experiments. J Cogn Neurosci 2: 358-372. doi:10.1162/jocn.1990.2.4.358. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.4.358
    [21] Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
    [22] Christman S (1989) Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research. Brain Cogn 11: 238-257.
    [23] Williams C, Azzopardi P, Cowey A (1995) Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for “blindsight.” Neuroscience 65: 577-586. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)00489-R. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00489-R
    [24] Sylvester R, Josephs O, Driver J, et al. (2007) Visual fMRI Responses in Human Superior Colliculus Show a Temporal–Nasal Asymmetry That Is Absent in Lateral Geniculate and Visual Cortex. J Neurophysiol 97: 1495-1502. doi:10.1152/jn.00835.2006.
    [25] Sapir A, Soroker N, Berger A, et al. (1992) Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation. Nat Neurosci 2: 1053-1054. doi:10.1038/15977.
    [26] Sapir A, Rafal R, Henik A (2002) Attending to the thalamus: inhibition of return and
    nasal-temporal asymmetry in the pulvinar. Neuroreport 13: 693-697. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200204160-00031
    [27] Mesulam MM (1999) Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354: 1325-1346. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0482
    [28] Karnath H-O, Himmelbach M, Rorden C (2002) The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain 125: 350-360. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf032
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xue-Ying Zhang, Ze-Kun Xu, Wei-Ran Lü, On Entire Function Solutions to Fermat Delay-Differential Equations, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 554, 10.3390/axioms11100554
    2. Yuxian Chen, Libing Xie, Hongyan Xu, Kenan Yildirim, Results on Solutions for Several Systems of Partial Differential-Difference Equations with Two Complex Variables, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/6158435
    3. Raju Biswas, Rajib Mandal, Entire solutions for quadratic trinomial partial differential-difference functional equations in $\mathbb{C}^n$ , 2024, Accepted, 1450-5444, 10.30755/NSJOM.15512
    4. Xiao Lan Liu, Hong Yan Xu, Yi Hui Xu, Nan Li, Results on solutions of several systems of the product type complex partial differential difference equations, 2024, 57, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2023-0153
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5332) PDF downloads(1043) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog