Our aim was to compare the prealbumin/fibrinogen ratio (PFR) of diabetic patient populations with or without diabetic nephropathy.
People with type 2 diabetes who attended the internal medicine outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. Two groups were formed according to the proteinuria of the patients: Diabetic nephropathy and non-nephropathy group. Diabetic nephropathy was calculated using the mathematical formula of spot urine albumin/spot urine creatinine x100. Patients with proteinuria above 200 mg/g were considered to have nephropathy. PFR was simply calculated by dividing prealbumin by fibrinogen.
A total of 152 patients who attended our outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. There were 68 patients in the diabetic nephropathy group and 84 in the non-nephropathy group. The prealbumin/fibrinogen ratios (PFR) were significantly lower in the nephropathic group [0.061 (0.02–0.16)] than the non-nephropathic group [0.0779 (0.01–0.75)] (p = 0.002).
We suggest that decreased levels of PFR can indicate diabetic nephropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Citation: Burcin Meryem Atak Tel, Ramiz Tel, Tuba Duman, Satilmis Bilgin, Hamza Kaya, Halil Bardak, Gulali Aktas. Evaluation of the relationship between the prealbumin/fibrinogen ratio and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(2): 90-98. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024008
[1] | Qiuxia Hu, Bilal Khan, Serkan Araci, Mehmet Acikgoz . New double-sum expansions for certain Mock theta functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17225-17235. doi: 10.3934/math.2022948 |
[2] | Suxia Wang, Tiehong Zhao . New refinements of Becker-Stark inequality. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19677-19691. doi: 10.3934/math.2024960 |
[3] | Zhenhua Su, Zikai Tang, Hanyuan Deng . Higher-order Randić index and isomorphism of double starlike trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31186-31197. doi: 10.3934/math.20231596 |
[4] | Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Youssri Hassan Youssri . Spectral tau solution of the linearized time-fractional KdV-Type equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15138-15158. doi: 10.3934/math.2022830 |
[5] | Tie-Hong Zhao, Zai-Yin He, Yu-Ming Chu . On some refinements for inequalities involving zero-balanced hypergeometric function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6479-6495. doi: 10.3934/math.2020418 |
[6] | Mustafa Inc, Mamun Miah, Akher Chowdhury, Shahadat Ali, Hadi Rezazadeh, Mehmet Ali Akinlar, Yu-Ming Chu . New exact solutions for the Kaup-Kupershmidt equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6726-6738. doi: 10.3934/math.2020432 |
[7] | Aslıhan ILIKKAN CEYLAN, Canan HAZAR GÜLEÇ . A new double series space derived by factorable matrix and four-dimensional matrix transformations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30922-30938. doi: 10.3934/math.20241492 |
[8] | Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Abdullah F. Abu Sunayh, Mohammed H. Alharbi, Ahmed Gamal Atta . Spectral tau technique via Lucas polynomials for the time-fractional diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34567-34587. doi: 10.3934/math.20241646 |
[9] | Ling Zhu . New inequalities of Wilker's type for hyperbolic functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 376-384. doi: 10.3934/math.2020025 |
[10] | Bai-Ni Guo, Dongkyu Lim, Feng Qi . Series expansions of powers of arcsine, closed forms for special values of Bell polynomials, and series representations of generalized logsine functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7494-7517. doi: 10.3934/math.2021438 |
Our aim was to compare the prealbumin/fibrinogen ratio (PFR) of diabetic patient populations with or without diabetic nephropathy.
People with type 2 diabetes who attended the internal medicine outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. Two groups were formed according to the proteinuria of the patients: Diabetic nephropathy and non-nephropathy group. Diabetic nephropathy was calculated using the mathematical formula of spot urine albumin/spot urine creatinine x100. Patients with proteinuria above 200 mg/g were considered to have nephropathy. PFR was simply calculated by dividing prealbumin by fibrinogen.
A total of 152 patients who attended our outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. There were 68 patients in the diabetic nephropathy group and 84 in the non-nephropathy group. The prealbumin/fibrinogen ratios (PFR) were significantly lower in the nephropathic group [0.061 (0.02–0.16)] than the non-nephropathic group [0.0779 (0.01–0.75)] (p = 0.002).
We suggest that decreased levels of PFR can indicate diabetic nephropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In [18] Ramanujan showed a total of 17 series for 1/π but he did not indicate how he arrived at these series. The Borwein brothers [5] gave rigorous proofs of Ramanujan's series for the first time and also obtained many new series for 1/π. Till now, many new Ramanujan's-type series for 1/π have been published, (see, for example, [4,6,8]). Chu [7], Liu [15,16] and Wei et al. [21,22] gave many π-formula with free parameters by means of gamma functions and hypergeometric series. Guillera [10] proved a kind of bilateral semi-terminating series related to Ramanujan-like series for negative powers of π. Moreover, Guillera and Zudilin [11] outlined an elementary method for proving numerical hypergeometric identities, in particular, Ramanujan-type identities for 1/π. Recently, q-analogues of Ramanujan-type series for 1/π have caught the interests of many authors (see, for example, [9,12,13,14,20,21]).
Although various definitions for gamma functions are used in the literature, we adopt the following definition [23, p.76]
1Γ(z)=zeγz∞∏n=1(1+zn)e−zn |
where γ is the Euler constant defined as
γ=limn→∞(1+12+⋯+1n−logn). |
It is easy to verify that Γ(1)=1,Γ(12)=√π and Γ(z+1)=zΓ(z). It follows that for every positive integer n, Γ(n)=(n−1)!.
For any complex α, we define the general rising shifted factorial by
(z)α=Γ(z+α)/Γ(z). | (1.1) |
Obviously, (z)0=1. For every positive integer n, we have
(z)n=Γ(z+n)/Γ(z)=z(z+1)⋯(z+n−1) |
and
(z)−n=Γ(z−n)/Γ(z)=1(z−1)(z−2)…(z−n). |
For convenience, we use the following compact notations
(a1,a2,…,am)n=(a1)n(a2)n…(am)n |
and
(a)(n1,n2,…,nm)=(a)n1(a)n2…(a)nm. |
Following [1,3], the hypergeometric series is defined by
r+1Fs[a0,a1,…,arb1,…,bs;z]=∞∑k=0(a0,a1,…,ar)k(b1,…,bs)kzkk!, |
where ai,bj(i=0,1,…,r,j=1,2,…,s) are complex numbers such that no zero factors appear in the denominators of the summand on the right hand side.
We let Fp:r;uq:s;v (p,q,r,s,u,v∈N0={0,1,2,…}) denote a general (Kampé de Fériet's) double hypergeometric function defined by (see [2,19])
Fp:r;uq:s;v[α1,…,αp:a1,…,ar;c1,…,cu;β1,…,βq:b1,…,bs;d1,…,dv;x,y]=∞∑m,n=0(α1,…,αp)m+n(a1,…,ar)m(c1,…,cu)n(β1,…,βq)m+n(b1,…,bs)m(d1,…,dv)nxmm!ynn!, |
where, for convergence of the double hypergeometric series,
p+r≤q+s+1andp+u≤q+v+1, |
with equality only when |x| and |y| are appropriately constrained (see, for details, [19,Eq 1.3(29),p.27]).
There exist numerous identities for such series. For example, we have
Theorem 1.1 (See [17,(30)] ) If Re(e−d)>0 and Re(d+e−a−b−c)>0, then
F0:3;31:1;1[−:a,b,c;d−a,d−b,d−c;d:e;d+e−a−b−c;1,1]=Γ(e)Γ(e+d−a−b−c)Γ(e−d)Γ(e−a)Γ(e−b)Γ(e−c). |
In [15], Liu used the general rising shifted factorial and the Gauss summation formula to prove the following four-parameter series expansions formula, which implies infinitely many Ramanujan type series for 1/π and π.
Theorem 1.2 For any complex α and Re(c−a−b)>0, we have
∞∑n=0(α)a+n(1−α)b+nn!Γ(c+n+1)=(α)a(1−α)bΓ(c−a−b)(α)c−b(1−α)c−a⋅sinπαπ. |
Motivated by Liu's work, in this paper we derive the following result from Theorem 1.1 which enables us to give many double series expansions for 1/π and π. To the best of our knowledge, most of the results in this paper have not previously appeared.
Theorem 1.3 If d∈N0,Re(e−d+σ−δ)>0 and Re(d+e−a−b−c+δ+σ−α−β−γ)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(α)a+m(β)b+m(γ)c+m(δ−α)d−a+n(δ−β)d−b+n(δ−γ)d−c+nm!n!(δ+d)m+n(σ)e+m(δ+σ−α−β−γ)d+e−a−b−c+n=(α)a(β)b(γ)c(δ−α)d−a(δ−β)d−b(δ−γ)d−c(σ−δ)e−d(σ−α)e−a(σ−β)e−b(σ−γ)e−c⋅Γ(σ)Γ(σ−δ)Γ(δ+σ−α−β−γ)Γ(σ−α)Γ(σ−β)Γ(σ−γ). |
Several examples of such formulae are
∞∑m,n=0(12)3m(12)2nm!n!(m+n)!(m+1)!(2n+1)=4π, |
∞∑m,n=0(−12)3m(32)3nm!n!(m+n)!(n+3)!(12)m+1=π, |
and
∞∑m,n=0(−23)2m(13)3nm!n!(n+1)!(2−3m)(−13)m+n=√3π3. |
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we give the proof of Theorem 1.3. Sections 3 and 4 are devoted to the double series expansions for 1/π and π, respectively.
First of all, by making use of (1.1), Theorem 1.3 can be restated as follows:
∞∑m,n=0Γ(a+m)Γ(b+m)Γ(c+m)Γ(d−a+n)Γ(d−b+n)Γ(d−c+n)m!n!Γ(d+m+n)Γ(e+m)Γ(d+e−a−b−c+n)=Γ(a)Γ(b)Γ(c)Γ(d−a)Γ(d−b)Γ(d−c)Γ(e−d)Γ(d)Γ(e−a)Γ(e−b)Γ(e−c). | (2.1) |
From (1.1) it is easy to see that
Γ(a+α+m)=(α)a+mΓ(α), Γ(b+β+m)=(β)b+mΓ(β), Γ(c+γ+m)=(γ)c+mΓ(γ),Γ(d−a+δ−α+n)=(δ−α)d−a+nΓ(δ−α), Γ(d−b+δ−β+n)=(δ−β)d−b+nΓ(δ−β),Γ(d−c+δ−γ+n)=(δ−γ)d−c+nΓ(δ−γ), Γ(d+δ+m+n)=(δ)d+m+nΓ(δ)Γ(e+m+σ)=(σ)e+mΓ(σ), Γ(a+α)=(α)aΓ(α), Γ(b+β)=(β)bΓ(β), Γ(c+γ)=(γ)cΓ(γ),Γ(d−a+δ−α)=(δ−α)d−aΓ(δ−α), Γ(d−b+δ−β)=(δ−β)d−bΓ(δ−β),Γ(d−c+δ−γ)=(δ−γ)d−cΓ(δ−γ), Γ(e−d+σ−δ)=(σ−δ)e−dΓ(σ−δ),Γ(d+δ)=(δ)dΓ(δ),Γ(e−a+σ−α)=(σ−α)e−aΓ(σ−α),Γ(e−b+σ−β)=(σ−β)e−bΓ(σ−β), Γ(e−c+σ−γ)=(σ−γ)e−cΓ(σ−γ),Γ(d+e−a−b−c+δ+σ−α−β−γ)=(δ+σ−α−β−γ)d+e−a−b−cΓ(δ+σ−α−β−γ). |
and we realize that (δ)d+m+n=(δ)d(δ+d)m+n when d∈N0. Replacing(a,b,c,d,e) by (a+α,b+β,c+γ,d+δ,e+σ) in (2.1) and substituting above identities into the resulting equation, we get the desired result.
In this section we will use Theorem 1.3 to prove the following double series expansion formula for 1/π.
Theorem 3.1 If d∈N0,Re(e−d+1)>0 and Re(d+e−a−b−c+32)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(12)(a+m,b+m,c+m,d−a+n,d−b+n,d−c+n)m!n!(d+1)m+n(2)e+m(32)d+e−a−b−c+n=(12)(a,b,c,d−a,d−b,d−c)(1)e−d(32)(e−a,e−b,e−c)⋅4π. |
Proof. Let (α,β,γ,δ,σ)=(12,12,12,1,2) in Theorem 1.3. We find that
∞∑m,n=0(12)(a+m,b+m,c+m,d−a+n,d−b+n,d−c+n)m!n!(d+1)m+n(2)e+m(32)d+e−a−b−c+n=(12)(a,b,c,d−a,d−b,d−c)(1)e−d(32)(e−a,e−b,e−c)⋅Γ(2)Γ(1)Γ(32)Γ3(32). | (3.1) |
Substituting Γ(32)=√π2 into (3.1) we obtain the result immediately. Putting (a,b,c)=(0,0,0) in Theorem 3.1 we get the following general double summation formula for 1/π with two free parameters.
Corollary 3.2 If d∈N0,Re(e−d+1)>0 and Re(d+e+32)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(12)3(m,d+n)m!n!(d+1)m+n(2)e+m(32)d+e+n=4(12)3d(1)e−dπ(32)3e. |
Setting d=0 and e=k∈N0 in Corallary 3.2 we have the following result.
Proposition 3.3 Let k be a nonnegative integer. Then
∞∑m,n=0(12)3(m,n)m!n!(m+n)!(m+k+1)!(32+k)n=4k!π(32)2k. |
Example 3.1 (k=0 in Proposition 3.3).
∞∑m,n=0(12)3m(12)2nm!n!(m+n)!(m+1)!(2n+1)=4π. |
If d=e=k∈N0 in Corollary 3.2 we achieve
Proposition 3.4 Let k be a nonnegative integer. Then
∞∑m,n=0(12)3(m,n+k)m!n!(k+1)m+n(m+k+1)!(32)n+2k=4π(2k+1)3. |
If we put k=0 into Proposition 3.4, then we can also get Example 3.1.
In this section we will prove the following theorem, which allows us to derive infinitely double series expansions for π.
Theorem 4.1 If d∈N0,Re(e−d−σ+1)>0 and Re(d+e−a−b−c+2)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(σ−1)(a+m,b+m,c+m)(σ)(d−a+n,d−b+n,d−c+n)m!n!(2σ+d−1)m+n(σ)e+m(2)d+e−a−b−c+n=(σ−1)(a,b,c)(σ)(d−a,d−b,d−c)(1−σ)e−d(1)(e−a,e−b,e−c)⋅πsinσπ. |
Proof. Let (α,β,γ,δ)=(σ−1,σ−1,σ−1,2σ−1) in Theorem 1.3. We obtain that
∞∑m,n=0(σ−1)(a+m,b+m,c+m)(σ)(d−a+n,d−b+n,d−c+n)m!n!(2σ+d−1)m+n(σ)e+m(2)d+e−a−b−c+n=(σ−1)(a,b,c)(σ)(d−a,d−b,d−c)(1−σ)e−d(1)(e−a,e−b,e−c)⋅Γ(σ)Γ(1−σ)Γ(2)Γ3(1). | (4.1) |
Combining Γ(σ)Γ(1−σ)=πsinσπ with (4.1) we get the desired result immediately. Putting a=b=c=0 in Theorem 4.1 we obtain the following equation.
Corollary 4.2 If d∈N0,Re(e−d−σ+1)>0 and Re(d+e+2)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(σ−1)3m(σ)3d+nm!n!(2σ+d−1)m+n(σ)e+m(2)d+e+n=(σ)3d(1−σ)e−d(1)3e⋅πsinσπ. |
Letting σ=12 in Corollary 4.2, we get the following proposition.
Proposition 4.3 If d∈N0,Re(e−d+12)>0 and Re(d+e+2)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(−12)3m(12)3d+nm!n!(d)m+n(12)e+m(2)d+e+n=(12)3d(12)e−d(1)3eπ. |
When we set d=1 and e=k∈N={1,2,3…} in Proposition 4.3 we obtain
Proposition 4.4 If k is a positive integer, then
∞∑m,n=0(−12)3m(32)3nm!n!(m+n)!(n+k+2)!(12)m+k=π(12)k−1(k!)3. |
Example 4.1 (k=1 in Proposition 4.4).
∞∑m,n=0(−12)3m(32)3nm!n!(m+n)!(n+3)!(12)m+1=π. |
Putting σ=13 in Corollary 4.2, we get the following proposition.
Proposition 4.5 If d∈N0,Re(e−d+23)>0 and Re(d+e+2)>0, then
∞∑m,n=0(−23)3m(13)3d+nm!n!(d−13)m+n(13)e+m(2)d+e+n=2√3π(13)3d(23)e−d3(1)3e. |
When we set d=0 and e=k∈N0 in Proposition 4.5 we obtain
Proposition 4.6 If k is a nonnegative integer, then
∞∑m,n=0(−23)3m(13)3nm!n!(−13)m+n(13)m+k(n+k+1)!=2√3π(23)k3k!3. |
Example 4.2 (k=0 in Proposition 4.6).
∞∑m,n=0(−23)2m(13)3nm!n!(n+1)!(2−3m)(−13)m+n=√3π3. |
Setting d=e=k∈N0 in Proposition 4.5, we get
Proposition 4.7 If k is a nonnegative integer, then
∞∑m,n=0(−23)3m(13+k)3nm!n!(n+2k+1)!(k−13)m+n(13)m+k=2√3π3k!3. |
Therefore, Example 4.2 can also be deduced by fixing k=0 in the above equation.
Example 4.3 (k=1 in Proposition 4.7).
∞∑m,n=0(−23)3m(43)3nm!n!(n+3)!(23)m+n(43)m=2√3π9. |
Double series expansions for 1/π and π with several free parameters are established and many interesting formulas are obtained. A point that should be stressed is that there is an important connection between the summation formulas for double hypergeometric functions and double series expansions for the powers of π.
The author was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (grant 19KJB110006).
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Lovic D, Piperidou A, Zografou I, et al. (2020) The growing epidemic of ddiabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 18: 104-109. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570161117666190405165911 ![]() |
[2] |
Arnous MM, Al Saidan AA, Al Dalbhi S, et al. (2022) Association of atrial fibrillation with diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis. J Family Med Prim Care 11: 3880-3884. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_577_21 ![]() |
[3] |
Kim YG, Han KD, Roh SY, et al. (2023) Being underweight is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death in people with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Med 12: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031045 ![]() |
[4] |
Bailes BK (2002) Diabetes mellitus and its chronic complications. AORN J 76: 266-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61065-x ![]() |
[5] |
Braunwald E (2019) Diabetes, heart failure, and renal dysfunction: The vicious circles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 62: 298-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2019.07.003 ![]() |
[6] |
Targher G, Bertolini L, Zoppini G, et al. (2005) Increased plasma markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction and their association with microvascular complications in Type 1 diabetic patients without clinically manifest macroangiopathy. Diabet Med 22: 999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01562.x ![]() |
[7] |
Spijkerman AM, Gall MA, Tarnow L, et al. (2007) Endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation and the progression of retinopathy in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 24: 969-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02217.x ![]() |
[8] |
Mansoor G, Tahir M, Maqbool T, et al. (2022) Increased expression of circulating stress markers, inflammatory cytokines and decreased antioxidant level in diabetic nephropathy. Medicina (Kaunas) 58: 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111604 ![]() |
[9] |
Yue W, Liu Y, Ding W, et al. (2015) The predictive value of the prealbumin-to-fibrinogen ratio in patients with acute pancreatitis. Int J Clin Pract 69: 1121-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12682 ![]() |
[10] |
Hrnciarikova D, Juraskova B, Hyspler R, et al. (2007) A changed view of serum prealbumin in the elderly: prealbumin values influenced by concomitant inflammation. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 151: 273-276. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2007.046 ![]() |
[11] |
Sun DW, An L, Lv GY (2020) Albumin-fibrinogen ratio and fibrinogen-prealbumin ratio as promising prognostic markers for cancers: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 18: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1786-2 ![]() |
[12] |
Omiya K, Sato H, Sato T, et al. (2021) Albumin and fibrinogen kinetics in sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 25: 436. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03860-7 ![]() |
[13] |
Chen C, Liu L, Luo J (2022) Identification of the molecular mechanism and candidate markers for diabetic nephropathy. Ann Transl Med 10: 1248. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5128 ![]() |
[14] |
Hou S, Jin C, Yang M, et al. (2022) Prognostic Value of Hematologic Prealbumin/Fibrinogen Ratio in Patients with Glioma. World Neurosurg 160: e442-e453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.048 ![]() |
[15] |
Bilgin S, Kurtkulagi O, Atak Tel BM, et al. (2021) Does C-reactive protein to serum Albumin Ratio correlate with diabEtic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes MEllitus? The CARE TIME study. Prim Care Diabetes 15: 1071-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2021.08.015 ![]() |
[16] |
Kocak MZ, Aktas G, Duman TT, et al. (2020) Monocyte lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of diabetic kidney injury in type 2 diabetes mellitus; The MADKID study. J Diabetes Metab Disord 19: 997-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00595-0 ![]() |
[17] | Wang J, Xi H, Zhang K, et al. (2020) Circulating C-reactive protein to prealbumin ratio and prealbumin to fibrinogen ratio are two promising inflammatory markers associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Lab 66. https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190833 |
[18] |
Zhang HL, Zhang XM, Mao XJ, et al. (2012) Altered cerebrospinal fluid index of prealbumin, fibrinogen, and haptoglobin in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand 125: 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01511.x ![]() |
[19] |
Zang S, Shi L, Zhao J, et al. (2020) Prealbumin to fibrinogen ratio is closely associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Endocr Connect 9: 858-863. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0316 ![]() |
[20] |
Rim TH, Byun IH, Kim HS, et al. (2013) Factors associated with diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy screening in Korea: the third and fourth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES III and IV). J Korean Med Sci 28: 814-820. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.814 ![]() |
[21] |
Hess K (2015) The vulnerable blood. Coagulation and clot structure in diabetes mellitus. Hamostaseologie 35: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.5482/HAMO-14-09-0039 ![]() |
[22] | Dayer MR, Mard-Soltani M, Dayer MS, et al. (2014) Causality relationships between coagulation factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: path analysis approach. Med J Islam Repub Iran 28: 59. |
[23] |
Zhou C, Zhang Y, Yang S, et al. (2022) Associations between visceral adiposity index and incident nephropathy outcomes in diabetic patients: Insights from the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 39: e3602. http://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3602.e3602 ![]() |
[24] |
Aktas G (2023) Association between the prognostic nutritional index and chronic microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Med 12: 5952. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185952 ![]() |
[25] |
Aktas G, Yilmaz S, Kantarci DB, et al. (2023) Is serum uric acid-to-HDL cholesterol ratio elevation associated with diabetic kidney injury?. Postgrad Med 135: 519-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2214058 ![]() |